Matea Gold, national political reporter for The Washington Post, talks with Steve Kornacki about Republican donors rallying to protect Republicans in Congress from any political damage that may come from Donald Trump's new role as the party's standard bearer. watch
Steve Kornacki reports on the continued outrage over long wait times to vote in Arizona's primary, particularly in Maricopa County, with new calls for a federal investigation and new legislation filed to ensure it doesn't happen again. watch
Robert Costa, national political reporter for The Washington Post, talks with Steve Kornacki about Donald Trump's path to the Republican nomination and the strategies of his opponents to beat him. watch
Mary Spicuzza, politics reporter for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, talks with Steve Kornacki about Wisconsin's role as the next major primary prize, the anti-Trump effort to stop the GOP front runner's steady advance, and the Sanders campaign's need for watch
* News from the FBI: "Seven Iranian computer experts linked to the government in Tehran were charged Thursday with cyber attacks against American banks and a dam in New York."
* Brussels bombing: "Belgium's justice and interior ministers acknowledged Thursday that the authorities had erred by not acting on Turkey's request last year that they take custody of a Belgian citizen arrested for suspected terrorist activity. The man was one of the Islamic State suicide bombers in the devastating Brussels attacks."
* Related news: "The two brothers named as the suicide bombers at the center of the Brussels airport and metro attacks this week were listed as a potential terror threat in U.S. databases, NBC News has learned. According to two U.S. officials, Khalid and Ibrahim El Bakraoui were known to U.S. counter terrorism authorities prior to Tuesday morning."
* ISIS losing ground: "As European governments scramble to contain the expanding terrorist threat posed by the Islamic State, on the battlefield in Iraq and Syria the group is a rapidly diminishing force."
* This may not be a sustainable posture: "Striking a defiant tone as scandals engulf her government, President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil insisted in an interview on Thursday that she would not resign, even as momentum builds in Congress for her ouster."
* Radovan Karadzic: "A former Bosnian Serb leader was found guilty of genocide and other charges on Thursday for his role in deadly campaigns during the Bosnian war in the 1990s, including the massacres of thousands in Srebrenica, as an international tribunal announced a long-awaited reckoning in Europe's bloodiest chapter since World War II."
Ordinarily, the most interesting thing about an election day is the results showing who won and who lost. But this week, with many watching the Arizona primary closely, the big surprise had nothing to do with the vote tallies and everything to do with the voting lines.
MSNBC's Zach Roth reported that some Arizonans were forced to wait as long as five hours to cast a primary ballot.
Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, called the long lines in Maricopa County "unacceptable," adding: "Our election officials must evaluate what went wrong and how they make sure it doesn't happen again." An editorial in the Arizona Republic called the lines "shameful."
Some voters in downtown Phoenix reportedly waited until after midnight to cast a ballot, after standing in line since before 7 p.m. A bipartisan presidential panel said in a 2014 report that voters shouldn't have to wait more than half an hour.
In theory, someone might generously suggest this is the result of stronger-than-expected voter interest. Maybe, the argument goes, Arizonans were so engaged in both parties' competitive contests that they showed up in droves and completely overwhelmed the system.
Except, that's not what actually happened. Turnout was strong, but it wasn't that strong.
So what created this fiasco? As it turns out, Arizona can blame, at least in part, the five conservatives on the U.S. Supreme Court.
A year ago at this time, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R) and his state's Republican-led legislature sparked a national controversy when it approved a right-to-discriminate measure, intended to empower workers to cite religious objections to deny services to the public. Initially, GOP officials weren't especially concerned about criticisms from the left.
But Indiana's state government changed direction when prominent businesses and private-sector leaders said they would start avoiding the state unless Indiana changed course. Pence did exactly that soon after.
A year later, Georgia's Republican-led state government is moving forward with a related "religious liberty" measure. The Washington Postreported this week reported that the Human Rights Campaign urged the entertainment industry to threaten to withhold business from Georgia if the bill becomes law. Varietyreported yesterday that one Hollywood giant agreed (via Ron Chusid):
The Walt Disney Co. and Marvel Studios indicated opposition to a Georgia religious liberty bill pending before Gov. Nathan Deal, saying that they will take their business elsewhere "should any legislation allowing discriminatory practices be signed into state law."
With generous tax incentives, Georgia has become a production hub, with Marvel currently shooting "Guardians of the Galaxy 2" at Pinewood Studios outside Atlanta. "Captain America: Civil War" shot there last summer.
A company spokesperson said yesterday, "Disney and Marvel are inclusive companies, and although we have had great experiences filming in Georgia, we will plan to take our business elsewhere should any legislation allowing discriminatory practices be signed into state law."
They join other major corporations headquartered in the state -- Coca-Cola, Home Depot, UPS, and Cox Enterprises -- in opposing the bill. AMC Networks, which films "The Walking Dead" in Georgia, also called for the state to reject the proposal. High-profile corporations from outside the state, including Apple, have joined the call.
Complicating matters further, the National Football League suggested "that such a law in Georgia could affect Atlanta's attempts" to host an upcoming Super Bowl.
Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.
* The next primary on the Republican calendar is Wisconsin, which hosts its contest on April 5. An Emerson College poll released yesterday found a very competitive GOP race, with Ted Cruz narrowly leading Donald Trump, 36% to 35%. John Kasich is further back with 19%.
* That same poll found Hillary Clinton with a modest lead over Bernie Sanders among Wisconsin Democrats, 50% to 44%.
* Speaking of Wisconsin, Gov. Scott Walker (R) hasn't formally endorsed any of his former presidential rivals yet, but he made his intentions clear yesterday. "Ted Cruz is the only one who's got a chance other than Donald Trump to win the nomination," Walker said.
* Clinton delivered a speech yesterday at Stanford University on her national security strategy as it relates to ISIS. It represented quite a contrast from what the public heard from the leading Republican candidates the day before.
* Pennsylvania will host a critically important primary in late April, and a new Franklin & Marshall poll shows a tight GOP race. Trump leads Kasich in the survey, 33% to 30%, with Cruz third with 20%.
* The same poll showed Clinton with a big advantage, at least for now, over Sanders among Pennsylvania Democrats, 53% to 28%.
As part of his trip to Argentina, President Obama co-hosted a press conference yesterday with President Mauricio Macri, and a reporter asked about the "optics" of Obama continuing with his schedule in the wake of the terrorist attack in Brussels. The American leader's response raised some eyebrows.
"Groups like ISIL can't destroy us, they can't defeat us. They don't produce anything. They're not an existential threat to us. They are vicious killers and murderers who perverted one of the world's great religions.
"And their primary power, in addition to killing innocent lives, is to strike fear in our societies, to disrupt our societies, so that the effect cascades from an explosion or an attack by a semi-automatic rifle."
The president went on to explain that he believes in reminding terrorists about the weakness by rejecting their efforts to change how we live.
But for some on the right, there was an important problem. What does Obama mean ISIS isn't "an existential threat"? How could he possibly say that?
Last fall, when Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R) started to recognize the severity of the catastrophe in Flint, he appointed members to a task force to determine what went wrong. There were concerns that the panel might hesitate before pointing the finger at the same governor who tasked them with uncovering the truth.
It was all the more striking, then, when the panel issued a report yesterday that said it's the Snyder administration that's "fundamentally accountable" for the Flint crisis, because it was the governor's environmental regulators and state-appointed emergency managers who created the mess. The state Associated Press reported:
The panel ... said what happened in Flint is "a story of government failure, intransigence, unpreparedness, delay, inaction, and environmental injustice." It also cited "intransigence and belligerence that has no place in government."
"Flint water customers were needlessly and tragically exposed to toxic levels of lead and other hazards through the mismanagement of their drinking water supply," investigators said.
Moreover, the 116-page report described as "inappropriate" a frequent claim of Snyder and his representatives that the Flint water crisis represents a failure of the local, state and federal governments. That suggests "that blame is attributable equally to all three levels of government," the report said.
The document, available online in its entirety, concluded, "The state is fundamentally accountable for what happened in Flint.
And what about the effort on the part of Republicans and both-sides-are-always-to-blame pundits to hold the federal EPA responsible for Flint?
North Carolina's state legislature wasn't supposed to be in session this week, but the Republican-led chambers rushed back to work for a special, taxpayer-financed session, focused solely on one key issue.
North Carolina legislators decided to rein in local governments by approving a bill Wednesday that prevents cities and counties from passing their own anti-discrimination rules. Gov. Pat McCrory later signed the legislation, which dealt a blow to the LGBT movement after success with protections in cities across the country.
The Republican-controlled General Assembly took action after Charlotte city leaders last month approved a broad anti-discrimination measure. Critics focused on language in the ordinance that allowed transgender people to use the restroom aligned with their gender identity.
If steps like these seem to be happening with increasing frequency, it's not your imagination. A variety of cities have approved higher minimum wages, only to have states pass laws to block municipalities from acting on their own. Some cities have tried to pass paid sick-leave for workers in their area, only to have states change the law to prohibit such steps.
And a month ago, the city of Charlotte banned discrimination against LGBT citizens, only to learn a month later that the state had not only scrapped the local measure, but also changed state law to prevent any city from expanding protections against discrimination.
As we discussed earlier this week, contemporary conservatism is generally committed to the idea that the government that's closest to the people -- literally, geographically -- is best able to respond to the public's needs. As much as possible, officials should try to shift power and resources away to local authorities.
Except, that is, when communities consider progressive measures Republicans don't like, at which point those principles are quickly thrown out the window.
So, let this be a lesson to everyone: when officials in Washington tell states what to do, it's an outrageous abuse and clear evidence of government overreach. When states tell cities what to do, it's protecting conservative principles.
It's understandable if House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) is feeling frustrated. His party appears likely to nominate a political amateur and former reality-show host as its presidential candidate. The House chamber the Speaker leads does very little meaningful work. The sitting president at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue doesn't seem to care for any of Ryan's far-right ideas.
And so the GOP leader decided it was time to deliver a speech, not on any one area of public policy, but about the state of politics itself. NBC News reported:
House Speaker Paul Ryan laid out his vision for a more respectful discourse in American politics on Wednesday against the backdrop of an increasingly divisive Republican presidential primary.
"Our political discourse -- both the kind we see on TV and the kind we experience among each other -- it did not use to be this bad and it does not have to be this way," the Wisconsin Republican told a group of bipartisan congressional interns. "Now, a little skepticism that is really healthy. But when people distrust politics, they come to distrust institutions. They lose faith in government; they lose faith in our future. We can acknowledge this. But we don't have to accept this. And we can't enable it either."
On the surface, few would object to a sentiment like this. Indeed, if I'd told you that the above quote had come from a Democratic leader who disagrees with Paul Ryan about everything, you'd likely believe it. There's just nothing objectionable about wanting a better political discourse and taking steps to bolster Americans' confidence in public institutions.
Indeed, Beltway pundits very likely swooned when Ryan acknowledged his own shortcomings.
"There was a time when I would talk about a difference between 'makers' and 'takers' in our country, referring to people who accepted government benefits," the Speaker said. "But as I spent more time listening, and really learning the root causes of poverty, I realized I was wrong. 'Takers' wasn't how to refer to a single mom stuck in a poverty trap, just trying to take care of her family. Most people don't want to be dependent. And to label a whole group of Americans that way was wrong. I shouldn't castigate a large group of Americans to make a point."
But before anyone gives Ryan too much credit for at least saying the right things, it's worth understanding the fundamental flaws in his latest pitch.
Four years ago this week, when the U.S. Supreme Court first took up the issue of the Affordable Care Act's constitutionality, then-Justice Antonin Scalia raised an argument that made clear that he literally didn't know what he was talking about.
Scalia argued at the time that the "Cornhusker Kickback," added to the ACA to earn then-Sen. Ben Nelson's (D-Neb.) support, was legally dubious and central to passage of the legislation. The problem, of course, is that the controversial provision wasn't in the law at all -- Scalia had heard about this in conservative media, rather than the legal briefs, but he didn't realize the measure was removed from the bill before passage.
During the same oral argument, Justice Samuel Alito asked a question that was "painfully detached from an understanding" of the underlying issue, or even "how insurance works."
"What type a burden does that impose? Is it because these exchanges are so unworkable, even with the help of a navigator, that a woman who wants to get free contraceptive coverage simply has to sign up for that on one of the exchanges?" Justice Samuel Alito asked, snarkily, about the Obamacare health insurance exchanges used by those without employer-based health care plans.
[Solicitor General Donald Verrilli] pointed out that those sort of contraceptive-only policies don't even exist on the exchanges.
Later, Chief Justice John Roberts insisted that women could simply purchase contraceptive coverage through exchange marketplaces. It fell to Justice Sonia Sotomayor to explain, "They're not on the exchanges. That's a falsehood."
It's tempting to think justices do their homework, read submitted legal briefs, and familiarize themselves with basic substantive details ahead of the oral arguments. But we're occasionally reminded that some justices form beliefs borne of confusion, and don't brush up on the facts ahead of time.
While running for governor in 2010, Alabama's Robert Bentley emphasized his "family values" credentials. The Republican candidate not only ran ads featuring his wife and family, but Bentley also said he believes so strongly in the sanctity of traditional marriage that as far as he's concerned, when same-sex couples wed, their marriages should be dismissed as "social experiments."
Given what we learned yesterday, the GOP governor probably shouldn't have made his family such a centerpiece of his platform.
Alabama's Sunday school-teaching governor was accused by his former top cop on Wednesday of breaking the Seventh Commandment -- thou shalt not commit adultery.
Spencer Collier claims he was fired from his post as head of the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency on Tuesday because he refused to cover up Gov. Robert Bentley's alleged affair with top political adviser Rebekah Caldwell Mason.
If you missed Rachel's coverage of this story last night, the clip is worth watching, because while we're seen plenty of politicians get caught in sex scandals, this one's a doozy.
Last fall, when the governor and his wife split after 50 years of marriage, there were widespread rumors about Bentley having had an affair, but yesterday the chatter became a legitimate story after Collier, up until recently Alabama's top cop, held a press conference to say he'd been fired for failing to go along with a scheme to hide the governor's personal misdeeds.
Bentley held a strange press conference soon after to apologize -- though it was unclear to whom he was apologizing and for what. The governor acknowledged his role in inappropriate communications with his aide, but the conservative Republican insisted he's never had a "physical relationship" with his top aide.
That dubious claim prompted the Birmingham News to release an audio recording of Bentley having a private conversation with Rebekah Caldwell Mason in which he seems to describe quite a bit of their romantic, physical interactions.
Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.