Latest StoriesRSS

select from:

E.g., 7/8/2015
E.g., 7/8/2015
U.S. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) speaks at a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington on March 19, 2015.

Boehner fibs again on immigration reform?

07/07/15 11:20AM

Exactly two years ago yesterday, House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) made a specific, public vow on the issue of immigration reform: "It is time for Congress to act.... I believe the House has its job to do, and we will do our job."
 
Whether Boehner knew this at the time or not is unclear, but the Speaker's promise was hollow. The Republican leader first ignored the popular, bipartisan reform bill approved by the Senate and endorsed by business leaders, unions, the faith community, law enforcement, and reform advocates, and he then ignored his own stated commitment. The GOP-led House never even held so much as a hearing about a reform bill.
 
On the contrary, the only action Boehner was willing to take on immigration was threatening to cut off funding for the Department of Homeland Security -- a threat that turned out to be about as serious as his promise that GOP members would "do our job."
 
But two years later, the Ohio Republican is saying something slightly different. Boehner was in Dublin late last week, addressing the Independence Day lunch of the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland. The Irish Times published this piece with a headline that read, "John Boehner pledge: Immigration reform top of agenda."
The speaker of the US House of Representatives John Boehner has told a Dublin audience of his determination to overcome Republican resistance to immigration reform. [...]
 
His remarks indicate he may yet move to confront opponents of reform within his own Republican party, which is in the vanguard of resistance to it and has a majority in the House.
Now, I haven't been able to track down a video of the Speaker's remarks, so it's hard to say with confidence exactly what Boehner said, but this report clearly suggests the Republican leader told his audience that he remains supportive of tackling immigration reform.
 
In other words, Boehner isn't just misleading American audiences on the issue; he's begun fibbing to foreign audiences, too.
Maine Governor Paul LaPage as guest speaker at the Portland Community Chamber of Commerce's regular Eggs & Issues discussion at the Holiday Inn by the Bay, May 8, 2013. (Photo by John Ewing/Portland Press Herald/Getty)

The challenge facing Paul LePage's defenders

07/07/15 10:40AM

The controversy surrounding Maine Gov. Paul LePage (R) is still very much underway, with the threat of impeachment looming on the horizon. But for the beleaguered governor to be forced from office, LePage will have to lose the support of his fellow Republicans in large numbers. How likely is that?
 
The Bangor Daily News' Mike Tipping had a good piece yesterday noting that the Maine GOP hasn't quite made up its mind. Senate President Mike Thibodeau (R) has, to date, taken the matter seriously, saying that while he's still acquiring information, "I am very saddened by this situation and shocked by what is being alleged." Other GOP state lawmakers have already endorsed the investigation into LePage's alleged misdeeds.
 
But Tipping stressed an important detail that's worth remembering:
Others, the more stalwart of LePage allies, have attempted to carry the governor's water, but that has proven a difficult thing to do. Without any real defense for what LePage did, they're left instead attempting to smear House Speaker Mark Eves.
Ordinarily, when a politician is accused of wrongdoing, the defense from his or her backers is incredibly simple: they say the charges are baseless.
 
That doesn't work in LePage's case -- he's already admitted to doing exactly what he's accused of doing. The governor's supporters can't push back against the allegations when their hero has made no effort to deny the allegations' accuracy.
A wedding cake is seen at a reception for same-sex couples.

The anti-gay bakery and the non-existent 'gag order'

07/07/15 10:13AM

There's something amazing about watching a bogus story spread like wildfire through conservative media. This week offered a rather classic example.
 
The story actually starts with a 2013 incident in which a lesbian couple in Oregon approached a local bakery, Sweet Cakes by Melissa, about a cake for their commitment ceremony. The bakery's owners, Aaron and Melissa Klein, refused, citing their anti-gay beliefs.
 
The couple, taking advantage of Oregon's Equality Act of 2007, filed a complaint -- state law prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. State officials, not surprisingly, sided with couple and imposed a fine against Sweet Cakes.
 
But a few days ago, the Heritage Foundation's Daily Signal published a report claiming that an Oregon labor commissioner had "placed an effective gag order" on the bakery. Which led the Weekly Standard to repeat the claim. National Review soon followed. From there, it was on to Breibart, the Daily Caller, Fox News' website, and on Sunday, a Fox News broadcast.
 
The Weekly Standard's piece, in particular, told readers:
According to the state, the Kleins are now forbidden from talking about the ruling against them.
This isn't true. Before your uncle who watches Fox all day sends you an all-caps email expressing his outrage, let's set the record straight.
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders speaks during a campaign rally in Madison, Wis. on July 1, 2015. (Photo by Christopher Dilts/Bloomberg/Getty)

The issue on which Bernie Sanders aims for 'the middle'

07/07/15 09:20AM

One of the biggest political stories of the summer is the reception Sen. Bernie Sanders is receiving on the presidential campaign trail. In a 2016 field filled with high-profile candidates, it's the Vermont Independent who's drawing the largest crowds.
 
This was evident yesterday in Maine, which came on the heels of similarly successful events in Iowa and Wisconsin last week. As Rachel noted on the show last night, Sanders is "having way more retail success on the campaign trail than anyone else in either party -- anyone."
 
Sanders' early success seems baffling to much of the political world, but let this be a lesson to observers: there are plenty of unapologetic liberals out there who are eager to celebrate Sanders and his vision.
 
But just away from the spotlight, there's still just one potential trouble area for the Vermonter. A few readers flagged this Facebook item yesterday from the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, which wasn't pleased with comments Sanders made in an interview on Sunday with CNN's Jake Tapper:
U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders' characterization here of the National Rifle Association-drafted "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act" that he voted for in 2005 is an utter fabrication. The bill has nothing to do with protecting upstanding gun manufacturers and dealers. Instead, it gives NEGLIGENT manufacturers and dealers blanket immunity from civil lawsuits. This law is THE REASON why two parents who lost their daughter in the Aurora shooting had their suit thrown out and are now being ordered to pay more than $200,000 in legal fees to gun companies that armed James Holmes.
 
It is an immoral law that denies victims and survivors their day in court -- a fundamental democratic right -- and Sanders' position is totally unacceptable. A big thanks to Jake Tapper for holding him accountable.
Sanders hasn't taken much heat from the left since launching his campaign, so it's worth pausing to appreciate what this is all about.
Republican presidential hopeful Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker speaks during the 2015 Southern Republican Leadership Conference on May 21, 2015 in Oklahoma City, Okla. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty)

The magical, disappearing Scott Walker conversation

07/07/15 08:47AM

The chief economist at the Heritage Foundation is itself an awkward title -- the Republican think tank has moved away from its pretense of rigorous policy analysis -- but the job belongs to Stephen Moore. Earlier this year, after Moore published a bizarre piece criticizing the Affordable Care Act, Paul Krugman described the conservative as "a guy who has a troubled relationship with facts."
 
Krugman added at the time, "I don't mean that he's a slick dissembler; I mean that [Moore] seems more or less unable to publish an article without filling it with howlers ... in a way that ends up doing his cause a disservice."
 
This assessment came to mind last night, reading this New York Times report on a bizarre incident involving Moore and a leading Republican presidential candidate.
Last Wednesday, Stephen Moore, a scholar at the Heritage Foundation who is an outspoken supporter of an immigration overhaul, described a recent telephone call with Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, in which he said Mr. Walker had assured him he had not completely renounced his earlier support for a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants.
 
"'I'm not going nativist, I'm pro-immigration,'" Mr. Walker said, according to Mr. Moore's account of the call to a reporter for The New York Times.
 
On Sunday, after three days of pressure from Mr. Walker's aides, Mr. Moore said that he had "misspoken" when recounting his call with Mr. Walker -- and that the call had never actually taken place.
This one's a doozy, so let's back up for a moment and consider how we got to this point.
Donald Trump speaks during the Republican Party of Iowa's Lincoln Dinner in Des Moines, Iowa on May 16, 2015. (Photo by Daniel Acker/Bloomberg/Getty)

Donald Trump finds a shovel, keeps digging

07/07/15 08:01AM

After his xenophobic comments in his campaign kickoff, Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump has become quite the lightening rod. It's been challenging to keep up with all of the businesses that no longer want anything to do with the controversial candidate, though the list continues to grow -- ESPN broke off its Trump ties yesterday.
 
Given the circumstances, it's tempting to think the GOP candidate would start to walk back his anti-Mexican rhetoric, for financial reasons if no other, but yesterday, he did the exact opposite. As Bloomberg Politics reported, Trump issued a 900-word statement yesterday afternoon, telling the world how right he was when he accused Mexican immigrants of being drug-carrying rapists.
"I don't see how there is any room for misunderstanding or misinterpretation of the statement I made on June 16th during my Presidential announcement speech," Trump wrote. [....]
 
Trump then turns his focus to Mexico. "I have great respect for Mexico and love their people and their peoples' great spirit," he wrote. "The problem is, however, that their leaders are far smarter, more cunning, and better negotiators than ours."
Even when bashing immigrants, Trump remembered how important it is to slam President Obama, too.
 
The lengthy statement included the relevant excerpt from his campaign kickoff, which Trump followed with, "What can be simpler or more accurately stated?" It was a rhetorical question, of course, though it's probably worth reemphasizing that Trump has no idea what he's talking about.
 
What's more, as Rachel noted on the show last night, towards the end of the written tirade, Trump argued, "After the speech was made, there were numerous compliments and indeed, many rave 'reviews' -- there was very little criticism. It wasn't until a week after my announcement that people started to totally distort these very easy to understand words. If there was something stated incorrectly, it would have been brought up immediately and with great enthusiasm."
 
Perhaps Trump wasn't paying close enough attention to the news in mid-June.

GOP debate countdown and other headlines

07/07/15 07:54AM

The mad scramble to get off the Republican debate bubble. (Bloomberg Politics)

Donald Trump appears to have a super PAC--with a P.O. Box address. (Bloomberg Politics)

Carly Fiorina's campaign raised $1.4 million since early May. (Wall Street Journal)

Britain marks 10th anniversary of London bombings. (Washington Post)

As another deadline looms, there's still no sign of a nuclear deal with Iran. (NPR)

Reaching Pluto and the end of an era of planetary exploration. (New York Times)

Long-forgotten Ayn Rand novel to be published today. (The New Republic)

read more

Links for the July 6, 2015, TRMS

07/06/15 11:22PM

Tonight's guests:

  • Frank Rich, New York magazine writer-at-large
  • MaryClaire Dale, Associated Press legal affairs reporter
  • State Rep. Todd Rutherford, (D-SC) Minority Leader

Tonight's links:

read more

SC Senate votes to remove Confederate flag

SC Senate votes to remove Confederate flag

07/06/15 09:39PM

Rachel Maddow talks to South Carolina State Rep. Todd Rutherford about the day of reckoning for the Confederate Flag in South Carolina, as the legislature took up the issue of whether the flag should be taken down outside the state capitol building. watch

Monday's Mini-Report, 7.6.15

07/06/15 05:30PM

Today's edition of quick hits:
 
* Greece: "Germany maintained a hard line with Athens on Monday after Greek voters rejected Europe's austerity policies in a referendum, intensifying pressure on Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras to restart bailout talks and opening a rift with European countries that appeared more inclined now to consider softening the push for austerity."
 
* ISIS: "America's battle against ISIS, dominated thus far by airstrikes and training opposition forces, must also include a battle against the group's 'twisted thinking,' President Obama said Monday. 'This is not simply a military effort,' Obama said in remarks after getting briefed on the anti-ISIS effort at the Pentagon. 'Ideologies are not defeated by guns. They're defeated with better ideas.'"
 
* Heartbreaking gun violence in Chicago: "Nine people died and 46 others were wounded in shootings across Chicago this Fourth of July weekend. Among those who died was a 7-year-old boy who was shot while watching fireworks in Humboldt Park with his father just before midnight Saturday."
 
* Keep an eye on this one: "Sometime in the next few weeks, aides expect President Obama to issue orders freeing dozens of federal prisoners locked up on nonviolent drug offenses. With the stroke of his pen, he will probably commute more sentences at one time than any president has in nearly half a century."
 
* An alarmingly early start for Washington's wildfire season: "Normally soggy Washington -- nicknamed the Evergreen State for good reason and home to the wettest town in the Lower 48 -- has never been hotter or drier at this point in the year, officials say, and the fire season has never begun so early or so fiercely."
 
* Hmm: "Former attorney general Eric Holder said today that a 'possibility exists' for the Justice Department to cut a deal with former NSA contractor Edward Snowden that would allow him to return to the United States from Moscow."
The dome of the State Capitol is seen as a protestor waves a Confederate flag during the March For Life anti-abortion rally, Jan. 22, 2014, in Atlanta, Ga. (Photo by David Goldman/AP)

South Carolina moves closer to pulling down Confederate symbol

07/06/15 04:44PM

The debate itself is overdue. As msnbc's Joy-Ann Reid reported, 154 years ago, South Carolina troops raised a Confederate flag in Charleston harbor on the day of President Abraham Lincoln's inauguration. A century later, another Confederate flag was "hoisted over the statehouse in a gesture of defiance against federal court-ordered desegregation"
 
And this morning, South Carolina's state Senate began debate on S. 897 -- a proposal to remove the Confederate battle flag from the Capitol grounds and move it to an interior "relic room for appropriate display."
 
For those hoping to see the state move forward, the debate may have been contentious, but it was constructive. The Post and Courier reported this afternoon:
Members of the South Carolina Senate have voted 37-3 to remove the Confederate battle flag from the Statehouse grounds.
 
Sen. Lee Bright, R-Roebuck, objected to giving the bill automatic third reading, which is usually a procedural vote, on Tuesday. For the bill to be sent to the House, it will need a two-thirds vote.
I'm not an expert in South Carolina's legislature procedures, but as I understand it, the state Senate will reconvene tomorrow for one last vote on the bill. Assuming there are no dramatic changes overnight, that vote will also be lopsided, at which point the bill will move on to the state House, where the margin is expected to be considerably closer.
 
Gov. Nikki Haley (R), who helped start the political debate, will sign the bill if it reaches her desk.
 
In the state Senate, the opposition votes came by way of just three Republican members: Lee Bright, Harvey Peeler, and Danny Verdin.
 
Bright, a former primary rival to Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and the current state co-chair of Sen. Ted Cruz's (R-Texas) presidential campaign, did more than just oppose the proposal.
Republican presidential candidate Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) arrives to address a legislative luncheon held as part of the "Road to Majority" conference in Washington, June 18, 2015. (Photo by Carlos Barria/Reuters)

Rand Paul draws parallel between taxes, slavery

07/06/15 03:09PM

It was just a couple of weeks ago that Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) unveiled his flat-tax plan, which is a bit of a mess. The Republican presidential hopeful assembled "an all-star team of the kookiest pseudo-economists in the history of the Republican Party" to help him craft a plan, and he came up with a 14.5% federal rate.
 
In practical terms, Paul is proposing a multi-trillion-dollar tax overhaul that the country couldn't possibly afford. But in ideological terms, the GOP senator's vision on tax policy is arguably even more outrageous.
 
BuzzFeed's Andrew Kaczynski reported today on remarks Paul delivered last week in Cedar Rapids, Iowa:
Paul said he believes that "you have to give up some of your liberty to have government," saying he was "for some government."
 
"I'm for paying some taxes," continued Paul. "But if we tax you at 100% then you've got zero percent liberty. If we tax you at 50% you are half slave, half free. I frankly would like to see you a little freer and a little more money remaining in your communities so you can create jobs. It's a debate we need to have."
Well, maybe. We can have a debate, for example, about the correlation between income-tax cuts and job creation -- which Rand Paul may not understand quite as well as he thinks he does. The senator might want to talk to Sam Brownback in Kansas about whether one leads to the other.
 
But once presidential candidates start equating taxpayers and slaves, there's a more serious problem.
Governor Chris Christie Announces His Run For Presidency

Chutzpah Watch - Chris Christie edition

07/06/15 01:08PM

In January 2014, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) held a lengthy press conference in which he tried to show at least some contrition. After scoffing at his "Bridgegate" scandal for weeks -- he even told reporters they would have to apologize to members of his team -- the Republican governor was confronted with so much evidence of wrongdoing within the Christie administration that he felt compelled to apologize.
 
Indeed, at the time, Christie went so far as to describe himself as "embarrassed and humiliated" by the actions of his own team.
 
A year and a half later, the governor is now a presidential candidate, and he's made the transition from humiliation to self-pity. As he did in May, Christie told Fox News yesterday he wants news organizations to apologize to him over Christie's own scandal.
 
It's a genuinely bizarre dynamic -- some of Christie's top aides conspired to cripple a community on purpose, abusing their power in the governor's name to a literally criminal degree, and Christie's defense is that he was simply too ignorant to know what was going on around him, creating a scandal that left him "embarrassed and humiliated."
 
And now he's waiting for journalists to apologize to him, as if Chris Christie were the victim of his own fiasco. The governor appeared on msnbc this morning, and continued to dismiss one of the biggest controversies of his career.
"Nobody cares [about Bridgegate]. They don't care cause here's why. They don't care because there's now been three independent investigations, all of which have said the exact same thing that I said the day after it happened. At some point people just say well after three investigations two of which were run by Democrats ... after a while people just say, 'Okay, I guess he's telling the truth.'"
Continuing to feel sorry for himself, the scandal-plagued governor added, "Instead of just standing up and saying what they should say, which is, 'We're sorry governor, for having jumped to conclusions, we're sorry for not only having accused you, but convicted you,' they say, 'Oh, it's a culture.' ... It wasn't a culture because if it was, there would have been a lot more of these incidents."

Pages