IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.
  • UP NEXT

    Columbia prof: NYPD presence has left students feeling less safe

    12:55
  • Post-Roe Dystopia is here

    10:13
  • Velshi Banned Book Club: ‘The Glass Castle’ with Jeannette Walls

    11:50
  • Ornstein: Trump’s second term plans make it impossible to treat this like a ‘typical’ election

    07:51
  • Tenn. lawmakers react to new bill allowing teachers to carry guns in schools

    07:47
  • 30 Years after apartheid: Reflecting on South Africa's ongoing fight for democracy

    06:06
  • ‘Slow Journalism’: Montana reporter sheds light on communities in news deserts

    06:24
  • Judge Luttig blasts SCOTUS for avoiding ‘key question’ at the heart of Trump immunity case

    12:12
  • It was a matter of ‘conscience’. Authors speak out about their protest against PEN America

    14:14
  • Trump and allies draw up plan to erode Fed’s independence, WSJ reports

    06:33
  • PEN America at odds with some of its members over stance on Gaza. CEO responds on ‘Velshi’.

    12:29
  • ‘People are being held accountable’: Arizona Sec. of State discusses fake electors charges

    08:57
  • Eddie Glaude argues for individuals to take political destiny from heroes and prophets

    07:09
  • 'I always wanted to be the change I wanted to see': Philadelphia Block Captain

    07:07
  • 'A major breakthrough': Volkswagen workers in Tennessee vote to join United Auto Workers

    05:47
  • The Art of Tanking a Deal: The dangerous cost of Trump withdrawing from Iran nuclear deal

    04:57
  • Both Israelis and Palestinians ‘feel that they’re on their own right now’

    06:51
  • Censored for his ‘lifestyle’ as a gay Indian man: Maulik Pancholy joins the Velshi Banned Book Club

    11:11
  • Ukrainian refugee who lost her husband to the war pleads with lawmakers to pass foreign aid bill

    08:42
  • Trump’s Potential VP Pick Banned from 17% of her own state

    05:01

The Constitutional Sheriffs movement subverts democracy

05:54

The "constitutional sheriffs" movement relies on a belief that county sheriffs have the power - and the duty - to make their own determinations about which laws to enforce and how to enforce them. It's not just enforcing laws and following the constitution - it also involves resisting laws, nullifying and refusing to enforce laws that a sheriff has deemed somehow unconstitutional. Whether used to oppose mask mandates or gun restrictions, voting laws or immigration policy, the movement is an overt abuse of power. There is no constitutional basis to back up their theory of sheriff supremacy, first of all. But it’s also a sign of something bigger. It’s a twisted interpretation of the constitution in order to assume power and subvert the systems of our democracy.