How to understand the Supreme Court's denial of a quick decision on presidential immunity
10:34
Share this -
copied
Despite Special Counsel Jack Smith imploring the Supreme Court to jump in and make a final decision on whether Donald Trump has presidential immunity from prosecution on a number of matters on which he is currently facing prosecution, the court decided to take a back seat to the circuit court taking a crack at it first. At issue now is what this does to the timing of Trump's trials, particularly the federal election interference case scheduled for March. Joyce Vance, former U.S. attorney, and Josh Gerstein, senior legal affairs writer for Politico, talk with Alex Wagner about where things stand.Dec. 23, 2023
UP NEXT
Catch and kill—in the courts? Joy calls out 'suspicious delays' in THREE of Trump's criminal trials
08:29
‘The constitution doesn’t even mention immunity’: Judge Luttig reacts to Trump Immunity claim
06:33
Trump presidential immunity case exposes conservative Supreme Court's true colors
07:38
‘All the king’s men’: Supreme Court ‘openly colluding' with Trump on immunity
07:45
'Dispiriting day for Special Counsel Jack Smith': SCOTUS considers Trump immunity claim
10:53
Justice Jackson raises a red flag on the idea of a president with no legal liability