IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Trump's latest salvo represents an 'all out assault on the rule of law'

Donald Trump has basically endorsed the political corruption of federal prosecutions, indifferent to the implications of such brazen abuses.
(FILES) This file photo taken on February 9, 2017 shows US President Donald Trump alongside US Attorney General Jeff Sessions after Sessions was sworn in as...

Rep. Chris Collins (R-N.Y.) was the first Republican member of Congress to endorse Donald Trump's presidential candidacy in 2016. Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) was the second. Last month, both were indicted by federal prosecutors in unrelated cases.

Yesterday, the Republican president made clear he isn't happy about it.

"Two long running, Obama era, investigations of two very popular Republican Congressmen were brought to a well publicized charge, just ahead of the Mid-Terms, by the Jeff Sessions Justice Department," Trump tweeted.He added, "Two easy wins now in doubt because there is not enough time," before delivering what appeared to be a sarcastic compliment to his top law enforcement official."Good job Jeff," Trump wrote.

After more than a year and a half in the White House, Donald Trump genuinely seems to believe that the federal justice system should shield the president's political allies -- not only because of their partisan allegiances, but also because, in Trump's mind, the attorney general should weigh electoral considerations before allowing criminal suspects to be charged.

Sally Yates, who served as acting attorney general before Trump fired her last year for giving the White House good advice, described the president's rhetoric as "nothing short of an all out assault on the rule of law," and I'm hard pressed to imagine how any fair minded observer would disagree.

Indeed, I'm not sure which is the bigger problem: the fact that the sitting president of the United States has basically endorsed the political corruption of federal prosecutions or the fact that he just doesn't care about the implications of such brazen abuses.

In 2006, the Bush/Cheney White House orchestrated a purge of several U.S. attorneys when the federal prosecutors resisted pressure to pursue politically motivated cases. This became the basis for a major scandal, but at the time, the scheme was hatched in secret -- because the White House didn't want the public to see them try to politicize prosecutorial decisions.

How quaint to be concerned about appearances.

Last year, Trump met with then-FBI Director James Comey and allegedly pressured him behind closed doors to go easy on a political ally, former White House National Security Advisor Michael Flynn, during a federal investigation. By most accounts, the incident is now being scrutinized by Special Counsel Robert Mueller as a possible example of obstruction of justice.

Yesterday, however, the president saw no need to hide behind closed doors: Trump was instead willing to suggest via Twitter that he wants federal law enforcement to go easy on his allies, in order to, among other things, improve their re-election chances.

Throughout American history, this would be the basis for the kind of scandal that would put a presidency in jeopardy. If investigative reporters had uncovered a White House document in which a sitting president argued that federal prosecutors should go easy on two allegedly corrupt members of Congress in order to help the president's political party, that wouldn't just be front-page news, it would lead many to question whether that president could reasonably expect to remain in office.

But in 2018, there's no secret document for investigative reporters to find. Donald Trump publishes this for all the world to see.

Why? In part because he's indifferent to the corruption of federal law enforcement, in part because this White House seems to think corruption that's done in plain view doesn't really count, but also because Trump simply doesn't know enough about Civics 101 to realize how scandalous his own nonsense is.

As we discussed once before, the FBI published a document several years ago, which someone should probably read to the president: "It is significant that we take an oath to support and defend the Constitution and not an individual leader, ruler, office, or entity. This is true for the simple reason that the Constitution is based on lasting principles of sound government that provide balance, stability, and consistency through time. A government based on individuals -- who are inconsistent, fallible, and often prone to error -- too easily leads to tyranny on the one extreme or anarchy on the other. The founding fathers sought to avoid these extremes and create a balanced government based on constitutional principles."

Trump doesn't appear to care about these principles. His promises about a "law and order" presidency now represent the punch line to a cruel joke.

Postscript: This is a rare instance in which the factual errors aren't the most interesting element, but for the record, Chris Collins' alleged crimes aren't from the "Obama era."