Appeals court rules against NSA phone program

The National Security Agency (NSA) logo is shown on a computer screen inside the Threat Operations Center at the NSA in Fort Meade, Maryland, January 25, 2006. U.S. President George W. Bush visited the ultra-secret National Security Agency on Wednesday...
The National Security Agency (NSA) logo is shown on a computer screen inside the Threat Operations Center at the NSA in Fort Meade, Maryland, January 25,...
The National Security Agency's program on collecting bulk information on telephone calls has struggled at times in the courts, but as NBC News' Pete Williams reported, the program's setback at a federal appeals court today is its biggest defeat yet.
The court ruling is available in its entirety here (pdf). The opinion was written by Judge Gerard E. Lynch, a President Obama appointee.
The unanimous appeals court panel conceded that a program like the NSA's may be a valuable national-security tool, but "such a monumental shift in our approach to combating terrorism requires a clear signal from Congress."
The ruling added that the Second Circuit finds the metadata program illegal "in the full understanding that if Congress chooses to authorize such a far-reaching and unprecedented program, it has every opportunity to do so, and to do so unambiguously."
That's no small detail given the current debate on Capitol Hill. As the New York Times report noted, "The House appears ready to pass a bill next week that would end the government's bulk collection of phone records and replace it with a new program that would preserve the ability to analyze links between callers to hunt for terrorists but keep the bulk records in the hands of phone companies."
The bill faces long odds in the Senate, where the Republican majority largely supports the status quo, including the "Section 215" provision of the Patriot Act that was used to justify the NSA program in the first place.
As a practical matter, this congressional disagreement is likely to make an important difference -- today's appeals court ruling didn't strike down the NSA program, but rather, sent it back to a lower court while the debate in Congress continues.
If lawmakers fail to do anything -- always a distinct possibility -- the legal dispute over the program's constitutionality would begin anew.
Postscript: The politics of the issue gets tricky to the extent that supporters and opponents cross traditional partisan lines. Many leading Senate Republicans denounced today's ruling, for example, while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) celebrated the news.
It's worth noting that Paul announced plans in January 2014 to file a legal challenge against this same NSA program. As part of the announcement, the Kentucky Republican asked like-minded Americans to help fight "Big Brother" by giving the U.S. senator their name, email address, zip code, as well as a possible financial contribution.
Paul's suit was eventually filed, though eight months later, it was put on hold pending judicial consideration of other, similar cases.