MTP Daily, Transcript 6/19/2017

Guests:
Kate Rogers, Tammy Duckworth, Ken Dilanian, Kristen Welker, Beth Fouhy, Rick Tyler, Pete Williams, David Wasserman
Transcript:

Show: MTP DAILY
Date: June 19, 2017
Guest: Kate Rogers, Tammy Duckworth, Ken Dilanian, Kristen Welker, Beth
Fouhy, Rick Tyler, Pete Williams, David Wasserman

KATY TUR, MSNBC HOST (voice-over): Under investigation for obstruction of
justice.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

JAY SEKULOW, ATTORNEY, DONALD TRUMP: The president is not and has not been
under investigation.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

TUR: Plus, floor exercises, as the GOP health care bill comes together
behind closed doors, Democrats demand transparency.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It`s a very small group in the Senate that have
actually seen the bill.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

TUR: Senator Tammy Duckworth joins us as Dems kick off a seven-hour talk-
a-thon and the dollars and cents of the Georgia Sixth.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

STEVE STIVERS, CHAIRMAN, NRCC: We can`t spend that sum of money on every
race.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

TUR: As voters there finally head to the polls tomorrow, who will get a
return on the most expensive race in Congressional history?

This is MTP DAILY and it starts right now.

(on camera): Good evening, I`m Katy Tur in New York in for Chuck Todd and
welcome to MTP DAILY.

Can the Republican Party survive a president under criminal investigation
or deeply unpopular health care overall or a toxic political climate?
We`re going to start to get some answers tomorrow when voters head to the
polls for a surprising nail-biter special election in deep red Georgia.

Georgia Sixth has become a Senate spectacle because of what it might tell
us about the current political climate. The president is tweeting up a
storm on this context right now. We`re going to dive into the race in just
a moment.

We`re also going to dive into the big issues that are shaking up the race,
including health care and the rancid political atmosphere.

But we begin tonight with perhaps the biggest story nationally. The
president`s legal crisis. Things have taken a bizarre turn as the
president`s outside counsel twists itself into knots to explain the
president`s statements.

After the president said he was being investigated for firing the FBI
director, a lawyer from his outside counsel, Jay Sekulow, flooded the air
waves to say the opposite.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEKULOW: I want to be very clear here and very direct. The president has
not been and is not under investigation.

The president has not been and is not under investigation.

The president is not under investigation.

And I`ve been crystal clear that the president is not and has not been
under investigation.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

TUR: Those statements raise a lot of questions, perhaps the biggest is how
was he so sure? Here`s three more from those interviews.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEKULOW: The president is not and has not been under investigation.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: How do you know?

SEKULOW: Because we`ve received no notice of investigation.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You don`t know that he isn`t under investigation now,
do you?

SEKULOW: Well, no one`s notified us that he is so I can`t read people`s
minds.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

TUR: And those answers raise another big question which Sekulow addressed
today.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEKULOW: We`ve not been notified. No, the president`s not under
investigation.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Is there any duty for them to tell you?

SEKULOW: No duty to tell in the sense of an obligation to tell but you
know how it works in Washington. If you were a target, if you were being
investigated, you would be told really quickly into the investigation.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

TUR: Well, that was quite a pause. Special Counsel Bob Mueller has no
obligation to tell the president he is under investigation, especially for
an inquiry in its early stages like this one. Because of that the fact
that special counsel has told them nothing doesn`t prove anything.

Sekulow had more to tell us about the president`s Twitter statement.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEKULOW: Here`s what you have, the president issued that tweet, that
social media statement, based on a fake report, a report with no documented
sources from “The Washington Post.”

I want to be crystal clear here. The president`s response was as it
related to “The Washington Post” report. He cannot, in a Twitter
statement, include all of that in there. But “The Washington Post”
statement came out that morning.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TUR: “The Washington Post” story he`s actually referring to came out
Wednesday night, not Sunday. The president`s statement came out, excuse
me, Friday morning, that`s what I meant.

Ultimately, here`s what the president`s lawyer is seemingly telling us.
When the president says he is being investigated for firing the FBI
director, he actually means the opposite. And by never mentioning a
“Washington Post” report from two days earlier, the president`s statement
confirming the story is actually his way of pointing out how wrong it is.

Confused yet? I`m joined by NBC`s intelligence and national security
reporter, Ken Dilanian, and NBC News` White House correspondent, Kristen
Welker.

So, Ken, help us. Let`s put this to rest. Is the president under
investigation?

KEN DILANIAN, INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY REPORTER, NBC NEWS: Katy,
NBC News has reported that he is. And we base our report on our source, a
former senior intelligence official familiar with the matter, who is aware
that Bob Mueller, the Special Counsel, is planning to interview two senior
intelligence officials, DNI Dan Coats and Mike Rogers, the Head of the NSA,
about conversations that Donald Trump had with them seeking to get them to
say there was no inclusion with Russia.

He`s doing that in the context of an obstruction of justice inquiry. And,
by the way, our report was confirming “The Washington Post” story that you
referenced that had many more sources.

[17:05:00] So, that`s really not in dispute. And, in fact, there is no
obligation and no standard practice for the Justice Department to notify
somebody that they`re under investigation until they`re about to be
indicted. Then, they may get a target letter. But that`s way down the
line and that`s not where we are right now.

But there`s no doubt Donald Trump is under investigation.

TUR: In addition to Coats and Rogers, what else will Robert Mueller be
doing to investigate this?

DILANIAN: Well, if he – so, he`s looking at obstruction of justice. He`s
already had, from James Comey and his testimony, a textbook example. I
mean, Comey laid out all the elements of obstruction of justice in public.

Now, Bob Mueller has to go and corroborate Comey`s story. So, presumably,
he`s going to want to interview numerous people inside the White House and
the FBI. Anyone who was in a meeting with Donald Trump, he`s going to want
to interview.

Obviously, Coats and Rogers and anyone else that Donald Trump talked to
about the investigation. He`s going to look at documents and, at the end
of the day, he`s going to decide, do they have a provable case here?

TUR: Sometimes the forest gets lost for the trees in these circumstances.
But the larger issue at hand, Ken, is the Russia investigation and what
this country is doing to stop Russia from trying to interfere in our
election.

So, what`s going on with that?

DILANIAN: Precious little, Katy, as far as I can tell. It`s an important
question. And I`ve been doing some reporting on it, and there`s going to
be some hearings on it in Congress this week.

There is no whole of government initiative from the Trump administration to
deal with this problem. There are two fronts, right? One is, has Russia
paid a price? Has Russia been deterred to not want to hack the U.S. again?
The answer to that appears to be no.

Secondly, what are we doing to shore-up the state election systems and to
look at how fake news traverses our social media platforms. There is very
little going on there.

DHS is doing a few things but the state election officials are resisting
because they don`t want federal interference in their elections. And
sometimes it breaks down along partisan lines.

But that`s a really interesting question that you raise and the answer is,
not much is happening.

TUR: Wow. Kristen Welker, does the White House think that the president
is under investigation? I ask because they`re lawyering up like it sounds
like they do think he is.

KRISTEN WELKER, WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT, NBC NEWS: He`s got a legal team
of four different lawyers, Katy, so there`s no doubt he`s preparing for a
protracted legal issue.

The White House will not answer questions about the Russia matter at all.
They refer all questions to the president`s outside counsel.

But there is no doubt, Katy, this is looming over this White House. It is
something that is impacting not only their messaging but, of course, the
agenda that the president wants to carry out.

And it`s creating a lot of mixed messaging. As you pointed out at the top
of the show, and that is creating even more difficulties. The press
secretary today held an off-camera briefing with no audio, so we were able
to ask him questions. But none of that, of course, was broadcast out live
to the American public.

I can tell you, though, that he didn`t answer a whole lot of questions
about that. What he did say, though is that the president continues to
have confidence in his entire administration, when asked specifically about
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

And he also allowed that everyone here serves at the pleasure of the
president, so sort of leaving that opening, that potential caveat. If
President Trump does, in fact, at some point, think that it`s time to
dismiss another top official here.

But, again, this is creating a real messaging challenge, I think, for this
White House and this entire administration – Katy.

TUR: And the fact that they did an off-camera briefing with audio only but
audio that cannot be broadcast, in effect – or is in itself quite
remarkable and some have likened (ph) it to stonewalling.

Kristen Welker, thank you very much. Ken Dilanian, thank you as well.

Let`s bring in tonight`s panel. Beth Fouhy is NBC News senior politics
editor. And Jon (ph) is an MSNBC Political Analyst and “Daily Beast”
columnist. And Rick Tyler is an MSNBC Political Analyst and former
communications director for the Ted Cruz campaign.

Guys, the president`s lawyering up. It seems like they may not want to
say, yes, he is under investigation. But they`re erring on the side of
caution right now.

BETH FOUHY, SENIOR POLITICS EDITOR, NBC NEWS: Well, they should. I mean,
but four lawyers, as Kristen said, is a remarkable number of lawyers. This
isn`t just a protective measure.

Vice President Pence, last week when he was asked about getting his lawyer,
he said something, like, it was purely procedural or something that was
done all the time. He, sort of, started to dismiss it.

Jared Kushner now also has a lawyer. He may be getting a new lawyer who`s
a more aggressive criminal defense lawyer than Jamie Gorelick, the one that
he has.

They`re clearly very nervous. They`re girding their loins and they`re
getting ready for battle. It, I guess, makes sense for Jay Sekulow to go
out and, you know, mix it up on the shows. I mean, perhaps they haven`t
been formally notified of an investigation but that doesn`t mean that the
investigation isn`t underway.

TUR: And Donald Trump`s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, has also gotten a
lawyer.

Let`s talk about Jay Sekulow and his twisting himself into a press hold to
try and explain away Donald Trump`s tweets. Who do we – who do we trust
here? If he is saying you can`t trust the president in what the president
says, it feels like both their credibility is really getting eaten way.

[17:10:06] JONATHAN ALTER, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Yes, I mean Sekulow on
Sunday did what we call the full Ginsburg. This is an old Washington
expression that relates to Monica Lewinsky`s lawyer back in the day when
Bill Clinton was under impeachment. It means you go on all of the Sunday
shows and spin on every one of them.

And just because you do it over and over again doesn`t make it more
effective. The fact that he hasn`t been notified that he`s being under
investigation does not mean he`s not under investigation.

And the wheels of justice grind slowly. These investigations take time and
Mueller is so experienced at this. He`s doing it in a methodical way. We
may not hear about very much for a while. We might be going into a quiet
period now because he`s not a leaker and it might be weeks, if not months,
before we learn much more substantive about this.

TUR: Can you argue this is an effective political strategy? Muddying the
waters, saying this is all about leaks, saying that people are out to get
my client. Donald Trump tweeting about – you know, referring to a deep
state. Is this – does this work for his base and is that enough?

RICK TYLER, FORMER CAMPAIGN ADVISOR, TED CRUZ: I think it does work for
his base but I don`t think it`s enough. Mike Pence may have been right.
It`s not unusual to hire a lawyer when you`re under investigation.

And I think the one thing that the president wanted Jay Sekulow to say on
every single show is that he wasn`t under investigation. But Jay Sekulow
ran into what every single person who`s tried to go out and talk – speak
for the White House or for Donald Trump, in particular, is Donald Trump is
going to contradict you. So, I mean, he literally says – I mean, if he
didn`t want people to know that he`s under investigation, why did he tweet,
I`m under investigation?

Now, some Trump supporters who have told me, they knew what he meant.

TUR: And did he mean?

TYLER: I don`t know – that he didn`t mean that. That he was responding
to “The Washington Post” story and said, well, when he said to vote for
Karen Handel tomorrow, what did he mean? So, it gets very confusing. I
mean, these words mean things.

ALTER: There were two things in that tweet that were lies. I mean, he
said, you know, I`m under investigation from the man, Rod Rosenstein, who
first recommended that I fire Comey.

Well, first of all, Rosenstein is not conducting the investigation so
that`s untrue.

TUR: Yes.

ALTER: And he didn`t recommend that he fire Comey because he decided to
fire Comey by his own admission.

TUR: He may have recommended to fire Comey but Donald Trump`s mind was
already made up.

(CROSSTALK)

ALTER: Who – so, he didn`t fire him at his behest.

TUR: Yes.

ALTER: That was just a memo to, kind of, cover them.

TUR: Do you think that he could be baiting Mueller to come out and say
something publicly?

FOUHY: Perhaps. I – there`s been very little sign that Donald Trump is
all that particularly strategic and it certainly – knowing his reputation,
he doesn`t do that. He`s quite methodical and everyone says he`s – you
know, he`s just going to plow ahead, based on everything that he`s ever
done in his past career.

But to your point to Rick, I mean, I`ve been out a lot in the field,
talking to Trump voters and other voters as well. But when I talk to Trump
voters, overwhelmingly what you hear is a distillation of the message that
they`re getting from Trump on Twitter. That everything would be going
great. You know, health care would be moving along, tax reform, getting
the economy back in shape, if for not this Russia investigation that is a
e-fiction (ph) propelled by his enemies, by Democrats who are still sick
over losing last November.

TUR: It`s the foundation he laid very effectively during the campaign.
Don`t listen to anybody. They`re just out to get me because I`m the one
who will come change things in Washington. And they`re going to fight like
hell to stop me from doing that.

ALTER: For it to work, he has to undermine Mueller. And Mueller has the
best reputation of any law enforcement official in this country in the last
40 or 50 years.

TUR: Everybody might have a great reputation but Donald Trump has gone in
and he`s just – he`s wiped the floor with everyone. He`s attacked anyone.
It doesn`t matter who it is. He called John McCain not a war hero. John
McCain.

ALTER: Yes. Well, it`ll work for 20 percent, maybe 30 percent. He needs
– he needs –

(CROSSTALK)

TUR: My question is why are we so sure now that it`s not working? And why
are we so sure now that he needs more and that his base is not enough?
These were all the same things that people were saying, you know, on
November 7th.

TYLER: Because Hillary Clintons was a terrible candidate. Now, it is
enough for him to hold his base and I think he will hold his base. And I
think we`re stuck with him for four years. But I think he has to expand
his base to beat the next Democrat that`s going to come along and run for
the 2020.

I also think this is – and, listen, I`ve said over and over for
independent candidates to run, it`s a disaster. We`ve seen a million of
them come and go and they always lose.

This is an actually unique time. And if you look at what Macron has done
in France, it`s a very unique time where someone could come in who`s not on
either hyper partisan end of the spectrum and say, let`s just get rid of
all these guys.

TUR: Interesting.

ALTER: Tomorrow`s a big day.

TUR: A big day and we`re going to talk about that. Don`t blow our lid.

ALTER: OK.

TUR: Rick Tyler, Jon Alter, Beth Fouhy, stay with us.

[17:15:00] Coming up, why Tuesday`s special Congressional election could be
the biggest political test yet of the Trump presidency.

Plus, the Supreme Court takes up a case that could have a major impact on
future elections. We`ll have the details for you next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

TUR: Welcome back.

The Supreme Court today agreed to consider, for the first time ever,
whether the long-standing political tradition of gerrymandering violates
the Constitution.

NBC`s justice correspondent, Pete Williams, has more from the Supreme
Court.

PETER WILLIAMS, JUSTICE CORRESPONDENT, NBC NEWS: Katie, it`s a case that
could change the face of politics. It comes from Wisconsin where the
Republicans gain control of all the machinery of state government in 2010,
both Houses of the legislature and the governor`s office. And then, they
began to redraw the maps for state legislative districts.

Some Democrats sued and said it was, basically, an unconstitutional
political gerrymander. And a federal appeals court agreed. For the first
time in decades, a court reached a ruling like that. It`s coming to the
Supreme Court where the justices in the past have been very skeptical of
these claims about political gerrymandering.

We`ve had cases in the past where Congressional districts, legislative
districts are struck down because they`re racial gerrymanders. So, the
question for the court is, what`s the test? How do you know when a state
has gone too far?

The challengers here say, easy. You look at something they call the
efficiency gap. You look at whether so many members of a minority party
are jammed into one district, that they`re more than they need to elect the
candidates in their choice or broken up and spread out in the other
districts that they have no power.

The court will hear the case in the fall – Katy.

TUR: Thank you, Pete.

The Supreme Court`s decision to take this case comes as Democrats are
ramping their effort to propose for 2020 when states will redraw the
boundaries of their legislative and Congressional districts for the first
time in a decade.

Former Attorney General Eric Holder is leading the effort at the request of
former President Obama. Holder joked that his job is to, quote, “make
redistricting sexy.”

We`ll be back with more MTP DAILY in just 60 seconds.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[17:20:04] TUR: Welcome back.

Tomorrow could be the biggest political test yet of the Trump presidency
and it`s happening far away from Washington in Georgia`s Sixth
Congressional district.

Tomorrow`s special Congressional runoff pits Republican Karen Handel
against Democrat Jon Ossoff for the seat vacated by HHS Secretary Tom
Price.

The latest polls show it is a tossup. Democrats must win in districts like
this where Republicans won the House seat but the president struggled if
they`re going to take back the House.

The stakes could not be higher. If Ossoff wins, it gives Democrats a
tangible victory for the anti-Trump resistance. It would be a warning shot
to Senate Republicans on health care which has been a big issue in this
race. And it would give Democrats momentum heading into the 2018 midterms.

If Handel holes the seat for Republicans, it gives the GOP confidence their
candidates can win even in a challenging environment. A green light to
push on with health care and a demoralizing blow to the Democrats.

Regardless, it is all costing a fortune, more than $50 million according to
“The Atlanta Journal Constitution.” The most expensive House race ever.

Joining me now is the expert, when it comes to the House races, David
Wasserman, House Editor at the “Cook Political Report. So, David, you are
the expert. What are you hearing down on the ground? What`s your sense of
things? Where is this going to go?

DAVID WASSERMAN, HOUSE EDITOR, “COOK POLITICAL REPORT”: Well, look, not
only is it the most expensive House race in history, but you`re going to
see a historic turnout for a House special election. We`re looking at
probably 250,000 votes being cast in the district by tomorrow night when
all is said and done. And that would be a higher turnout than we`re likely
to see in most districts in the 2018 midterm elections.

And that high turnout may be keeping Karen Handel in this ball game,
because Republicans are the ones who are less angry with what`s happening
in Washington. And the fact that they`re turning out in greater numbers
than in the first round when Ossoff got 48 percent, it really keeps this
race pretty close.

And I still think Ossoff`s the favorite by a point or two. But it`s a
tossup.

TUR: So, if Democrats don`t win it, how bad is it for him? What happens
to their – for them? What happens to their narrative?

WASSERMAN: Well, if Democrats fall short here, you know, they`ll still
have a good shot at the House in 2018, in my opinion, because this
district`s right at about the center of the types of districts that they
would need to win to win the House.

Hillary Clinton got a higher share of the vote in 26 districts currently
held by Republicans, and so this is right, kind of, at the median of House
control. But, still, it would be embarrassing for Democrats because
they`ve poured so much money into this election.

TUR: Yes.

WASSERMAN: And they came so close in the first round. And Donald Trump`s
approval rating is in the mid to high 30s.

TUR: Yes. And the question there is, if they can`t win in this
environment, what environment can they win? And will they be able to raise
as much money for future races if they can`t prove themselves here?

WASSERMAN: Well, it`s a great question. Look, hey, they`ve poured so much
money that Jon Ossoff has been able to afford, I think, four Spanish
language ads in a district where the electorate is likely to be less than
five percent Latino. And they`re not going to be able to do that in every
district in 2018.

But for every action in politics, there tends to be an equal and opposite
reaction. And Democrats may have generated some Ossoff fatigue in Georgia
Six and that could explain why this election is still very, very close or
could potentially explain if Karen Handel pulls it out, why she`s able to
win.

But I think you`ll see Democrats with an even wider enthusiasm edge in
House races in 2018 when turnout is a little bit lower than it is in the
special.

TUR: I wouldn`t normally ask this, but since there`s just a truly
revolting ad out that invokes it. But do you think the Scalise shooting is
going to affect this race any way? I don`t want to show the ad, because
it`s just, frankly, too – it`s just too terrible. But do you think that
that is going to somehow affect voters?

WASSERMAN: I don`t see it having an impact. And voters already had pretty
firm ideas of who they would support before this last-minute ad. Everyone
agrees that this is a tragic event.

And I think if there`s one thing driving the race, that`s not in ads in
this race, it`s Donald Trump. You`re not seeing his name come up in paid
communication in the district. But he is on the minds of voters more so
than Nancy Pelosi is.

And even though Republicans are trying to make her the issue, Democrats`
biggest advantage, when it comes to Congressional races right now, is that
they don`t have a clearly identifiable leader –

TUR: Yes.

WASSERMAN: – as a port for Republicans to uses a foil. And we know that
Donald Trump does really, really well when he can beat up on one opponent.

TUR: Yes.

WASSERMAN: And Democrats don`t have that clear opponent.

[17:25:01] TUR: Talking about health care, Jon Ossoff has been focusing on
it in the race. Karen Handel, on the other hand, told Breitbart that it
hasn`t been that much of an issue on the ground for voters in the Sixth.
The biggest issue is that Jon Ossoff is from outside the district.

The president himself has been tweeting about that very same thing. But
give us some reality. How much does health care matter in Georgia Six
right now?

WASSERMAN: Well, it`s a big reason why Democrats are fired up, both in
terms of pre-existing conditions, lifetime caps. You know, Democrats
around the country are really animated because they feel under threat.

And, at the same time, you`re seeing – you`re seeing – you`re seeing
health care come up very little in the race. Democrats have tried to
attack Karen Handel`s stewardship of plan – of the Susan Komen Foundation,
as it relates to her position on Planned Parenthood. That`s barely moved
the needle in the district. But Democrats haven`t hammered home the AHCA
as I might have expected they would have several months ago.

TUR: The House race expert, David Wasserman. Thank you very much.

WASSERMAN: Thanks so much, Katy.

TUR: And still ahead, all talk, no action. Any moment now, Senate
Democrats will take to the floor to try and stall the GOP`s health care
plan.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Effective immediately, I am
canceling the last administration`s completely one-sided deal with Cuba.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

TUR: Welcome back.

President Trump`s announcement on Friday rolling back some of the Obama
administration`s Cuba policies was crafted in large part by Senator Marco
Rubio.

The collaboration comes despite the bitter rivalry between then candidate
Trump and Rubio during the 2016 campaign and also as at least 55 senators
from both parties are calling on the White House to remove all travel
restrictions to Cuba.

Chuck spoke to Senator Rubio on Sunday from “Meet the Press.” Here`s a part
of their conversation on Cuba.

(START VIDEO CLIP)

CHUCK TODD, NBC NEWS POLITICAL DIRECTOR, “MEET THE PRESS DAILY” SHOW HOST:
I want to ask you about the president`s decision on Cuba. A lot of
reporting indicated that you were very much involved in the writing of this
policy.

Senator Jeff Flake, a Republican from Arizona, came on my show earlier this
week and essentially said if this – you know, that there`s a majority in
the senate, perhaps a super majority in the senate that would vote to lift
all sanctions, to lift the travel – excuse me, lift that travel ban for
Americans going to Cuba.

Why not put your policy here that you pushed for up for a vote in the U.S.
senate to see if it has the support of the United States senate?

SEN. MARCO RUBIO, R-FLORIDA: Well, I mean, any senator has a right to offer
that sort of amendment. Here`s what I would say to you, you guys are
analyzing this change in the wrong way. This is not a punitive measure
against Cuba as much as it is certainly has a punitive aspect with regards
(ph) to the military. This is about empowering individual Cubans.

Everybody including the people you just mentioned who advocate for this
opening that Obama made to Cuba have all said that one of the best by-
products of it was this growing private sector. There`s dispute about
whether it`s growing. That`s fine. Americans can now continue to travel to
Cuba and there is misreporting that they have to do so as part of the
group.

You can go through the category of support for the Cuban people as an
individual. The only thing is, you can`t spend money at military
facilities. You have to spend money primarily with individual Cubans. You
have to stay at Airbnb. You have to eat at the private restaurants that
they are running. It is up to the Cuban government now to allow individual
Cubans to do more of that activity.

This is about empowering individual Cubans to be free from government
economic control of their lives. That`s the purpose at the core of this
measure. All it says is no more money for the Cuban military run entities,
why should Americans be funding and supporting the Cuban military who is
behind enormous amounts of instability in the region including what we see
now in Venezuela.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

TUR: Up next, Senator Tammy Duckworth joins me to discuss what, if
anything, Democrats can do to shape the senate health care bill. But first,
Kate Rogers has the “CNBC Market Wrap.” Hi, Kate.

KATE ROGERS, REPORTER FOR CNBC: Hey there, Katy. Thanks so much. The Dow
and S&P closed at record highs as text tax rebound today. The Dow jumped
144 points surpassing last week`s all-time high, the S&P gained 20 points,
while the Nasdaq added 87 points.

Apple, the world`s most valuable publicly traded company rose another 2.9
percent today. Google parent company, Alphabet, gave 1.7 percent. And also,
Time Warner announced $100 million deal to produce scripted content for
Snapchat and Snapshare rose on that news. That`s it from CNBC, first in
business worldwide.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

TUR: Welcome back. Democrats in the senate have had it with the secrecy
surrounding the Republican health care bill. Tonight they are staging an
hour`s long talkathon on the senate floor in protest. The bill is being
crafted behind closed doors and without any public hearing scheduled, but
we could still be speeding toward a vote.

NBC`s Capitol Hill team says we could see some kind of outline of the bill
as soon as this Wednesday with a marathon of votes starting next week. So
Democrats are now trying to do whatever they can to slow the process
including planning to use procedural tactics this week to stall senate
business. But the fact remains Republicans control the White House, the
house, and the senate.

And Democrats don`t have any seats at the negotiations. And they let
consensus among themselves over what changes if any they would be open to
making on Obamacare.

Joining me now is Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth of Illinois. Senator,
thank you for joining us. What have you heard, if anything, about what is
in the senate health care bill?

SEN. TAMMY DUCKWORTH, D-ILLINOIS: I have not heard a single thing about
what`s in the senate health care bill. All I can do is based on what came
out of the house, and if anything, it`s going to be tragic for so many
Americans, as many as 23 million Americans across this country will lose
health insurance.

TUR: You know, we asked this of every Democrat that comes on. We really
want to get to the bottom of what they believe needs to be fixed about the
Affordable Care Act, about Obamacare. What in particular would you want to
fix if you were given that opportunity?

DUCKWORTH: If I were given the opportunity, I would want to make sure that
we can keep more insurers in the marketplace, there are parts of the
country where there is a single insurer. I think that we need to make sure
that we make it a little bit easier for people to have options within the
marketplace and greater competition.

I do know that, you know, I voted against a medical device tax, for
example, and that temporary fix is coming back, the medical device tax
actually would be a tax that would have passed costs onto consumers. So
there are things that we can do to fix it but certainly scrapping it and
getting rid of health insurance for 23 million Americans which is what the
Republicans are trying to do is not the fix.

TUR: What about those in your party who want universal health care? Are
they wasting their time by suggesting that?

DUCKWORTH: Well, you know, I think that we`re not going to be any place in
the near term to pass universal health care. I do think that one of the
things we could look at is a buy-in to Medicare, some sort of a version of
public option that would certainly put someone else into the marketplace
that would make it more accessible for Americans.

But, bottom line, the solution is not to put 13 men in a room and not allow
anybody to look at what they`re drafting. And, by the way, they`re so
secretive about it. They won`t even tell us what room they`re meeting.

TUR: Let`s get realistic. What power do Democrats have on their own to
craft legislation?

DUCKWORTH: Well, the power that we have is a power to people. We are not
just on our own. The American people are making their voices heard. That`s
why you see people.

TUR: But what about in the senate specifically? What power do you have
right now to craft your own legislation?

DUCKWORTH: We can certainly delay. That`s what we`re going to try to do. We
are going to try to delay to force them to come to the table and show the
American people what is in this bill. There needs to be a committee
hearing. They want to bring this to the floor for a vote without even a
committee hearing. So we don`t even know what`s in it.

From everything that I see here, they`re going to be bringing it to the
floor just within hours of forcing us to vote on something that no one will
have had a chance to read. And so what we can do is we can delay, we can
force them to have a time crunch and an exchange of what we will say is
we`ll then bring it out and let the public take a look at this bill.

TUR: So it is the best strategy for Democrats` obstruction? Is that the
only strategy that you have?

DUCKWORTH: Well, the strategy is to pressure them to bring this out into
the light of day and certainly slowing things down. Forcing them to be open
about the process is important. Allowing the American people to rise up
which they did with the house bill in the first version. And as I travel
around Illinois, I hear it from everyone. Tell us what`s in it. This is
what I`m asking Mr. McConnell, tell us what`s in it.

TUR: Sounds a lot like obstruction, senator.

DUCKWORTH: Well, it is, but it`s one of the many things we are trying to
do. But destruction is not just to obstruct. Destruction is to make sure
that they bring it out into the light of day. We`re not going to let them
just fast track this thing onto the floor with no votes, with no
discussion, so that they`re going to have people vote on something that
will haunt the American people.

We are talking about 23 million Americans who will be thrown out on the
streets without health insurance. There will be a tax increase on veterans.
As many as 7 million veterans will see a tax increase after having served
this country. This is a bill that takes health care away from the working
core in order to give tax cuts to the very rich. I will step up and I will
fight it every step of the way.

TUR: And most Democrats like you are very passionate about this subject.
But if the Republicans do come to an agreement, they do come forward with a
bill and send to the house and house signs it and the house goes and passes
it on to the president. What can Democrats do to stop it? Is there any path
whatsoever? Is there any strategy?

DUCKWORTH: Well, I don`t think there`s much we can do to stop it, but can
certainly make it clear to the American people what has happened to them.
We will see that all those Americans who will lose health insurance.
People like myself with a pre-existing conditions who will suddenly find
they can no longer afford health care insurance.

They are going to back to the battle days. People will die without access
to health insurance. We are going to see children who will suffer. We will
see the elderly who will be thrown out of their nursing homes because of
the cuts to Medicaid. What we can do is make sure the American people
understand what is happening here.

TUR: One of your colleagues, Bernie Sanders, was at a progressive people`s
summit gathering in Chicago the other day and he was talking about the
Democratic strategy saying, the current model and current strategy of the
Democratic Party is an absolute failure. Do you agree?

DUCKWORTH: Well, you know, I just got elected to the senate and all I can
say is I`m doing everything I possibly can. I don`t know that there is an
outright strategy that the party is crafting to move forward. All I can
tell you is that every tool at my disposal, I will use. I will protect the
people of my state and of this country. I will protect people who are a
part of the working poor who need health insurance.

I am going to protect people with pre-existing conditions. I am going to
protect veterans. I am going to protect the elderly. I am going to make
sure I do everything that I can and whatever tool I have left in my
toolbox, I`m going to use it to make sure that I serve the people of
Illinois and the people of this country. And I`m not going to let
Republicans do this to the American people.

TUR: Do you want the party to be more moderate or more progressive?

DUCKWORTH: Look, I voted against the medical device tax. You know, I`m a
pretty moderate Democrat but I`m also a very progressive one when it comes
to things such at making sure that working American, hard-working folks
have access to health insurance. You don`t get rid of something before you
have a fix for it and that`s what we`re faced here.

And, you know, I`m open to allowing people to buy into Medicare, for
example, so that we can get more folks covered and that`s certainly an
option that is more progressive, but it`s also more realistic and we`re
actually offering real solutions to the issues that we`re facing as opposed
to pushing something through that will put people into the streets without
health insurance.

TUR: Some of your colleagues down in the house, some Democratic colleagues,
are bringing up the word “impeachment.” Do you think it`s helpful right now
to be talking about impeaching the president of the United States?

DUCKWORTH: I personally don`t think that it`s helpful. What I`m focused on
is the very fact that Russia attacked this nation, this nation that I wore
the uniform to protect and defend for 23 years of my adult life. We were
attacked in cyberspace, but an attack nonetheless and stole the entire
voting file for the state of Illinois. And they have yet to be punished.

They have yet to punished. I want to know what connections people that are
in the White House have to Russia that is doing this. And, you know, we
still haven`t punished Russia. And we should allow this independent
investigation to move forward and whatever they find out, they find out.

Let`s make it nonpartisan. Let`s former Director Mueller do his job and get
out of his way. You know, he may find that there`s nothing there. If he
does, great. But if he does find that something is there, we need to hold
those people accountable because you are colluding with the enemy.

TUR: Senator Tammy Duckworth, appreciate your time. Thank you.

DUCKWORTH: Thank you.

TUR: Still ahead, tensions rise between the U.S. and Russia over the
conflict in Syria. Details next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

TUR: Welcome back. The heightened tensions between the U.S. and Russia are
now playing out in the skies over Syria. Russia is warning the U.S.
military that Russian forces will shoot down planes and drones operated by
U.S.-led coalition forces spotted west of the Euphrates. The Russian
defense ministry also cut off a communication channel designed to help
prevent mid-air collusion over Syria.

It comes a day after the U.S. military shot down a Syrian air force jet
after the aircraft dropped bombs near U.S. backed coalition forces on the
ground. It`s the first time American forces have downed a Syrian aircraft
since the start of the country`s civil war back in 2011.

General Joe Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the
downing of the aircraft was done in self-defense and that the U.S. will
work diplomatically and militarily to re-establish deconfliction. We`re
back with “The Lid” right after this.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

TUR: Time for “The Lid.” The panel is back. Beth Fouhy, Jonathan Alter,
Rick Tyler. So, is Georgia 6 going to be the canary in the coal mine, Beth?

BETH FOUHY, NBC NEWS SENIOR POLITICS EDITOR: Oh, my gosh. I`m out of the
predictions business. I will say – I was there for a few days over the
weekend and what we reported and what I saw was a huge amount of enthusiasm
for Jon Ossoff, the Democrat. 12,000 volunteers, all the suburban moms who
had never been involved in politics before out there doing their thing,
really excited about this campaign and wanting to flip that seat.

Very little enthusiasm on the other side for Karen Handel. She is not a
very compelling candidate. Nonetheless, it is a very Republican district.
And I think the chances that Ossoff is going to win, it`s going to be very,
very, very close.

TUR: Are the voters for Ossoff as excited? Are these volunteers, people who
are from that district who can vote in that district?

FOUHY: I found on both sides that each – Republicans didn`t even know that
much about Karen Handel. But the ones who are going to come out and vote
for her were going to do it because they are going to pull that Republican
lever and keep that seat in Republican hands.

On the other side, it was very much, we`re going to fight back at what we
we see happened in November. We`re not going to let that happen again. And
Jon Ossoff is our vessel to make sure that we can change things.

TUR: So Ossoff isn`t entirely focusing on Donald Trump. He is away from
that and talking more about health care, getting into the substance of an
issue rather than just painting Trump as the devil, as some Democrats and
liberals have been doing. Do you think that is going to be an effective
strategy for him?

JONATHAN ALTER, COLUMNIST FOR THE DAILY BEAST, MSNBC ANALYST: Yes, he`s
pursuing the right strategy. If you watched his debate, he moved away from
attacking Trump. His advertising is not about Trump. He doesn`t want to be
a referendum on Trump. He`s trying not to make the mistake that Hillary
Clinton made, just running against Trump. He`s speaking up on health care
and wide variety of other issues. The amazing thing about this kid is.

FOUHY: Yeah, he`s young.

ALTER: . he doesn`t live in the district. He was a documentary filmmaker
and a congressional aide. He didn`t really have any experience in politics
but he has played error-free ball from month after month after month which
is really hard in the glare of this publicity, and not make mistakes.

TUR: Yeah.

ALTER: And other Democratic candidates have a lot to learn from him,
whether he wins or loses.

TUR: Remarkable discipline already. Donald Trump is making that same point
that he doesn`t live in the district. He`s been tweeting about it for the
past – during the past hour. Initially, he spelled Karen Handel`s name
wrong. But they deleted that and fixed it.

How much of an issue is there going to be that he doesn`t live there?
That`s what Handel is focusing on. She`s not really focusing on health
care. She told Breitbart that`s the biggest issue.

RICK TYLER, REPUBLICAN PUBLIC RELATIONS AND POLITICAL STRATEGY ADVISOR:
Well, it doesn`t make sense that he doesn`t live there. I mean, I`ve heard
this excuse which is pretty pathetic, right? But, I don`t think in the end
it`s going to make that big of a difference. The thing about Ossoff is that
he fits the district.

I mean, Democrats and progressive particularly have to be willing to take
someone like that to win those kind of seats. Will it be a bellwether? Only
in that – those are the kind of seats that Democrats need to win in order
to the majority in 2018. If he wins, they can show, yes, we can pick off
these kind of Republican seats. This is not a Trump district. It`s a
Republican district.

TUR: But they weren`t enthusiastic for Trump in this district.

TYLER: No, Trump won it by two percentage points but Tom Price won it by 22
or some 22 or 24 points. And so you have a lot of people who are in the
district who are like – who were the progressives who are excited to work
for Ossoff, but then you have people who are like – it may be a referendum
on Trump.

TUR: Say the Democrats lose by just a point. It`s very close for the
Democrats. Ossoff loses. Does that stop moment them cold?

TYLER: (inaudible) live in the district.

(LAUGHTER)

ALTER: You know, close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.

TUR: Yeah.

ALTER: The Democrats have to win one of these things if they`re going to
keep their momentum for 2018. So it`s a very, very important election for
Democrats. It is not like this is being nationalized by Ossoff and his
people. So the obnoxious fund-raising emails that a lot of Democrats around
the country are getting, they`re not getting those inside the district in
the same way.

TUR: How interesting.

ALTER: They`re running kind of two campaigns, raising money in the rest of
the country. Inside the district, it`s being done by locals. They`re very
conscious of not having a lot of the people coming down to help, you know,
out campaigning as much as I think people assume.

It`s very skillfully run campaign. I think if he loses, it will because it
has been so nationalized that Republicans who normally would have stayed
home in an off-year special election, they`re not mobilized. They go, hey,
what is this all about? Maybe they will pay attention.

TUR: Yeah.

ALTER: . if they show up in some numbers who could get upset. But he has
favored in most polls.

TUR: Final thought?

FOUHY: Yeah, it`s a huge, huge turnout. Something like twice the number of
people have already voted, than did in the first go-around in April.
Projecting, you know, yet another huge turnout tomorrow. We`re going to see
sort of an outcome that is as large as a normal congressional race would
be, instead of a special election. I do think that there is some – if
Ossoff loses, there would be a significant demoralization.

ALTER: And a big impact on health care. Big impact on health care.

TUR: Jon Ossoff calling you right now.

(LAUGHTER)

TUR: Guys, I appreciate it. Beth, Jon, Rick, thanks so much for being here.
Jon, I hope that`s a call from somebody interesting. After the break, an
update on the member of the White House you might have missed lately. Stay
tuned.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

TUR: In case you missed it, you probably haven`t seen much of White House
press secretary lately. That`s not because he`s gone anywhere. Despite
another round of rumors today, Sean Spicer still has his job. It`s because
in case you missed it, there hasn`t been an on-camera White House briefing
since last Monday. So here are a couple things you may have missed from
today`s of-camera White House briefing.

Spicer told the White House press corps he still has not had a chance to
ask the president if he thinks climate change is man-made. He had the same
answer when asked by a reporter earlier in the month. And those rumored
White House tapes of conversations between President Trump and former FBI
Director James Comey, Spicer said it`s possible the White House would have
an answer on their existence later in the week.

The president recently said, you`re going to be very disappointed by that
announcement. We will be even more disappointed if the answer no matter
what it is, isn`t on camera either. That will do it for me tonight. We`ll
be back tomorrow with more “MTP Daily.” “For the Record” with Greta starts
right now. Greta, I`m giving it to you 19 seconds early today.

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY
BE UPDATED.
END

Copyright 2017 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are
protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the
prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter
or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the
content.>