IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Transcript: The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell, December 23, 2020

Guest: Jason Crow

Summary

Donald Trump issued second wave of pardons with 28 days left in office. Congressman Jason Crow of Colorado is interviewed. Millions of Americans will now not get economic relief for which they are so desperate, or at least those checks won't get sent out next week because there is no bill passed to determine how much those checks will be. What you need to do to prioritize your mental health as the pandemic rages worse than ever is discussed.

Transcript

ALI VELSHI, MSNBC HOST: Rachel, you were talking about the president's schedule and whether or not he will ever come back from Mar-a-Lago. The key interesting takeaway is when motivated, he works really hard. When motivated to overturn the election, he's working really hard. When motivated for these commutations and pardons for people who worked in the tank for him, he works really hard.

He just didn't work on a lot of other things including coronavirus. We have jobs like that, right? You and I are lucky to be able to talk about what we want to talk about every night, but sometimes you have to do things you don't want to do, and this president has not done that.

RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST: That's in part why I'm so worried about the prospect of a pocket veto for the COVID relief bill, Ali, because he hasn't wanted to work on anything due to COVID at all, and in fact, if what he does is nothing on that COVID bill, if he refuses to sign or veto it and just lets it sit there which is the way he's treated coronavirus for a very long time now, that will mean there is no relief for anyone, the government shuts down, there is no eviction protections, there's nothing in that bill, and all he has to do is make that happen is zip. I am worried we might be on that course.

VELSHI: And people will continue to die.

It is remarkable to have been so unmoved by this thing, but he has proved his ability to be unmoved. Rachel, you have a great, great holiday. We look forward to seeing you on the other side of it.

MADDOW: Thanks, Ali. Appreciate it.

VELSHI: All right. Good night.

Rich white crooks of America, your time has come. If you're rich, if you're white, if you're a man, if you've been convicted of a crime, and of course, if you're loyal to Donald Trump, you get a pardon.

Tonight, Trump continued his appalling pre-Christmas pardon spree, finding more criminal lackeys he could let off the hook. Now, feign shock with me like, when I tell you that two of the biggest names on Trump's pardon list are friends who refused to rat out to Trump to Robert Mueller.

Paul Manafort convicted by a jury of tax and banking crimes then pleaded guilty of conspiracy against the United States and conspiracy to obstruct justice. As part of a plea deal, Manafort admitted to money laundering, tax fraud, illegal foreign lobbying and defrauding banks.

Roger Stone, whose 40-month prison sentence had already been commuted by Trump was convicted on seven counts of lying to Congress, witness tampering and obstructing the house investigation into possible Trump campaign coordination with Russia.

Neither Manafort nor Stone ever fully cooperated with Robert Mueller's prosecutors despite entering guilty pleas. And why would they? They had these pardons dangled in front of them for years by Trump to help ensure that their mouths were kept shut.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REPORTER: Will you pardon Paul Manafort?

DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I don't talk about that. I don't talk about that. I think the whole Manafort trial is very sad when you look at what's going on there. I think it's a very sad day for our country. He worked for me for a very short period of time, but you know what, he happens to be a very good person. And I think it's very sad what they've done to Paul Manafort.

REPORTER: Are you considering pardoning Roger Stone?

TRUMP: Well, I'll be looking at it. I think Roger Stone was very unfairly treated, as were other people.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

VELSHI: Now, that's just the stuff Trump said on camera. Just stay on long enough and I'll make sure you're taken care of, law and order, America first. This round of pardon was announced after Trump fled to Mar-a-Lago for the holidays, hiding among sycophants and loyalists who surely will tell him how good and magnanimous he is for these acts of clemency, which also included a pardon for the father of his son-in-law, Charles Kushner.

Jared's dad pleaded guilty in 2004 to 16 counts of tax evasion, a single count of retaliating against a federal witness and one of lying to the Federal Election Commission. It's all bad. It's very, very bad, but the worst of what Charles Kushner did is arguably what led to that single count of retaliating against a federal witness. The witness he was accused of retaliating against was his brother-in-law whose wife, Charles Kushner's sister, was cooperating with federal officials in a campaign finance investigation into Charles Kushner, her own brother.

Charles Kushner was accused of videotaping his brother-in-law with a prostitute and then sending the tape to his sister. That's the retaliation.

The case against Charles Kushner was prosecuted by then-U.S. attorney Chris Christie, the long-time Trump friend and former New Jersey governor. Here's how Christie described the crimes that Charles Kushner went to prison for just last year.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CHRIS CHRISTIE, FORMER GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY: I just think it was so obvious he had to be prosecuted. If a guy hires a prostitute to seduce his brother-in-law and videotapes it and then sends the videotape to his sister to attempt to intimidate her from testifying before a grand jury, do I really need any more justification than that?

I mean, it's one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes that I prosecuted when I was U.S. attorney. I was U.S. attorney in New Jersey, Margaret, so we had some loathsome and disgusting crime going on there, but I just laid out the facts. Any objective person who looks at the facts knows confronted with those facts, I had a moral and an ethical obligation to bring that prosecution.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

VELSHI: One of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes. Feign shock with me again to the continued benefit that undeserving men, and they're almost all men on that list of 26 today, who committed terrible crimes are getting from this president.

But let's end on a note of hope. This is the final show before Christmas, we all need a little hope tonight.

Keep this in mind, Paul Manafort is not in the clear just yet. Manafort's business dealings are still under legal scrutiny from the Manhattan district attorney who could bring state charges that are not protected by Trump's pardon.

In a statement tonight, the Manhattan D.A.'s office said this action underscores the urgent need to hold Mr. Manafort responsible for his crimes against the people of New York as alleged in our indictment, and we will continue to pursue our appellate remedies.

Leading off our discussion tonight, Joyce Vance, former U.S. attorney for the northern district of Alabama and a professor at the University of Alabama Law School, and Michael Schmidt, Washington correspondent for "The New York Times." They are both MSNBC contributors.

Good evening to both of you. Great to see you.

Michael, let's start with the news. There was some sense this was coming. Obviously, Manafort and Stone are the big names that we were expecting. It's not a big surprise.

The question is, particularly with Charles Kushner, Donald Trump is getting closer and closer to family, and he's still got more than three weeks in the White House.

What are the indications about what happens next?

MICHAEL SCHMIDT, MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR: Well, that's sort of the big question, how much further will the president go? He has now pardoned several people who wouldn't cooperate with these investigations that looked at his campaign's ties to Russia. He has done this with Jared Kushner's father. He has done this with allies, with folks that have ingratiated themselves with the president.

He's done it at a rate that no president is ever believed to have done. What I mean by that is most presidents, previous presidents gave pardons to people who went through the Justice Department division to ensure they were given out fairly. In the president's case, he has sidetracked that process throughout, and has allowed this sort of other thing -- I'm not even sure how to describe it -- to pop up where you can lobby the White House, whoever you are, and you can hire anyone to do that.

And the president, as a Harvard law school professor, has charted, has given pardons and commutations at a rate of over 90 percent to people who are either close allies to him or helped him politically.

Now, going forward, how far will he go? Will he take the extraordinary move of giving his family members preemptive pardons? Will Rudy Giuliani, his personal lawyer, will he go that extra step to essentially say even though you have not been charged by the Justice Department, I'm clearing you of any wrongdoing you can be accused of up until this point, sort of the extreme ultimate get out of jail free card?

That's the question that we'll be looking at for the weeks to come.

VELSHI: Joyce, the Harvard professor that Michael Schmidt was talking about, his name is Jack Goldsmith. And he wrote -- or he's reported to have said: Of the 65 pardons and commutations that Trump has granted before Wednesday, before today, 60 have gone to petitioners who had a personal tie to Mr. Trump or helped his political aims. That tabulation done by Harvard professor Jack Goldsmith.

Again, this is not the spirit of what pardons are for. I remember hearing in years gone by these pardons, but I thought, what an interesting story. I didn't know the story of that person. Obviously, we have seen some interests of pardons that were cronies or allies of the president. We've never seen it on this scale.

JOYCE VANCE, MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR: No, usually those sorts of pardons on the exception, not the rule, but President Trump seems to be surrounded by an awful lot of people in his inner circle, close friends who are in need of a pardon, and that's really what separates this from the typical pardon process.

This is a president who is offering pardons to people who possibly could have offered testimony that would have indicated that he himself had engaged in misconduct or perhaps even in criminal conduct, because when you think about it, Roger Stone or Paul Manafort, they didn't refuse to cooperate with federal prosecutors as some showing of principle, they refused to cooperate because if they testified truthfully, it would have been damaging to someone and possibly, likely damaging to the president. So that's the terrain that we have here.

But look, Ali, some of these pardoned look like the kind of pardons that had they gone through a traditional DOJ pardon and vetting process, they would have been righteous sorts of pardons, people who served their sentence and gone on to turn their lives around. The president sprinkles those sorts of pardons with ICE agents, he violated civil rights or political pardons and especially these that he uses to protect himself are just a glaring violation of the process.

VELSHI: Yeah, it's not that there are none of those, there are just very few of them. They're a very small percentage, according to Professor Goldsmith. Five of the 65 pardons fall into that category so far.

Michael Cohen tweeted, Michael. He said: What happened tonight shows how broken the whole criminal justice system is. Despite me and my family being threatened by Donald Trump, I still cooperated with dozens of federal and state agencies, Mueller and Congress, and all these criminals received pardons. This is wrong.

This is not to hold Michael Cohen up on any pedestal, but Michael Cohen didn't go along with Donald Trump's dangles, or the idea that if you don't say anything, you'll be taken care of, and Michael Cohen is not being taken care of.

SCHMIDT: Yeah, Michael Cohen went to prison for three years. I think it's important to understand the context of what happened here. It's that the president, through his public statements and through his personal lawyer John Dowd, and through his other allies made it clear that if you were not going to -- if you were not going to cooperate against the president, if you were to keep your mouth shut, he was in line with you.

He supported that, he encouraged it publicly, and some people went along with that. Paul Manafort one of them, Roger Stone the other.

As Joyce was pointing out, that meant that Mueller's investigators were never able to get a full picture of what the two people who they were probably most suspicious about, stone and Manafort, about their ties to Russia. They never got full accounts from them about their contacts during the campaign.

So that means that the investigators were inhibited or obstructed from doing everything that they needed to do to get to the bottom of it. Nevertheless, Robert Mueller's investigation made no determination about whether the president broke the law or not. Mueller said he could not do that.

Fast-forward two years later. Now, the president is pardoning those individuals, the president still has not been accused by Robert Mueller or the Justice Department or any federal authority of breaking the law, and the president is, you know, less than four weeks away from the I understand of his presidency.

So there's been an investigation of him. We were not able to find out because this prosecutor, Mr. Mueller, was not able to determine whether the president broke the law. That was a judgment Mr. Mueller said. And now the president has pardoned the people who did not cooperate with that investigation.

That leads many people to believe that the president has been able to live above the law, a belief that not just Democrats have but many legal experts, and that's really the legacy tonight that we see of the Mueller investigation.

VELSHI: But, Joyce, the interesting thing about that is that the president gets political cover on this. I want to play for you what Lindsey Graham said about pardoning Paul Manafort on March 13th of 2019, almost two years ago.

Let's listen to what Lindsey Graham said.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REPORTER: Would you advise the president against pardoning Paul Manafort?

SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM (R-SC): Yeah, yeah.

REPORTER: Why?

GRAHAM: He -- yeah, I mean, the point is that pardoning Manafort would be seen as a political disaster for the president. There may come a day down the road after the politics have changed that you would want to consider an application for him like everybody else, but now it would be a disaster.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

VELSHI: You know, my producers can tell me if we've got a statement from Lindsey Graham right now, but Lindsey Graham is fully in Donald Trump's tank at the moment. So the president is not even getting pushback from Republicans on this.

VANCE: No, there's absolutely no pushback coming on this. And ultimately what's going to have to happen is people will really need to think about this and view it not as a political issue but as a rule of law issue. This notion that today it was Donald Trump, but do we want to set this precedent down the road where if we should happen to have another president who engages in this kind of behavior, another Richard Nixon, that they will feel free to protect themselves from legal consequences.

I lover Mike's phrase, living above the law, because it reflects so much so well what Trump tried to set himself up to do.

The question for the American people is, are we going to tolerate that or do we need to hold the president accountable to the standard the Founding Fathers meant to live within the law?

VELSHI: That is the conversation that we have to have moving forward. This is no longer a piece of history. We expected this to happen. But how we got to this point is the question that we all need to think about and address.

Thanks to both of you for a very thoughtful conversation, Joyce Vance and Michael Schmidt. We appreciate you being with us tonight.

Coming up next, one of the impeachment managers who made the case to remove President Trump from office joins us next to react to the president's abuse of his pardoning powers. Congressman and veteran Jason Crow joins us next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

VELSHI: I want to be forthcoming. We have had some response from a Republican to Donald Trump's pardons.

Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska has put out a statement on the pardons. It reads: This is rotten to the core. That's the entire statement. This is rotten to the core.

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff was appalled when we spoke with him last night about this first round of lame duck pardons issued by President Trump. Tonight, he's even more outraged. Here he is with Rachel tonight.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REP. ADAM SCHIFF (D-CA): He's pardoning people who lie and have no compunction about it. He's pardoning people like in Iowa who cheat an election. He's pardoning family members. He's pardoning people he can relate to because they're like him. And, of course, I think, as you indicated, there is more of that coming.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

VELSHI: Joining us now, Democratic Congressman Jason Crow of Colorado. He's a member of the Armed Services Committee. He was one of the seven House impeachment managers in the impeachment of Donald Trump. He's also a former Army Ranger who served in Iraq.

So, a number of these matters are relevant to your experience.

Congressman, good to see you. Thank you for joining us.

Your response, first of all. Not a major surprise. I guess the surprise is the degree to which these are now no longer the standouts. These are unusual pardons for people who stuck by Donald Trump. They are the mainstay of the end of term pardons.

REP. JASON CROW (D-CO): Yeah, good to see you, Ali.

You know, we shouldn't be -- we shouldn't be surprised at all this is what's happening. I mean, the president told us long ago who he was. We have known for years that he is somebody that is loyal only to himself.

Loyalty within the Trump administration, by the way, is just a one-way street, right? These folks are being pardoned for a specific reason. I think they're being pardoned because they can deliver something to Donald Trump, and we have to ask ourselves what exactly that is going forward.

But the larger story for me here is the silence of so many people. That is so much the story of the Trump era. Speaking of folks like Ben Sasse is in a class of his own right now.

VELSHI: Yeah, and by the way, that silence can apply to these pardons, it can apply to the continued efforts that the president is making to overturn the election, it can be applied to the fact the president vetoed the National Defense Authorization Act in part because he didn't want to go along with the renaming of Confederate bases.

I mean, you are a man who put your life on the line for this country. His view of what veterans and what the military does is skewed.

CROW: Well, let's just look at what's playing out today. The story of the Trump administration has played out in the last ten hours.

Here you have a nation that's under attack right now. I think this has to be made very clear, everybody, that our nation is under the largest cyberattack we have ever seen in our nation's history.

We have government systems that are compromised. We have a huge adversary in Russia that actually has access to some of our very important national security systems. We have men and women, hundreds and thousands of whom are serving our freedom and democracy today, tonight, while we sit here and talk, who are trying to do the right thing.

And on the day that all of that is happening, you have Donald Trump sitting in the White House vetoing a defense bill that's meant to give a 3 percent pay raise to those troops, that is meant to actually bolster our cyber offenses and respond to the very attack we're under right now, and he's sitting here giving pardons to his political friends and his cronies and those who have shown no contrition and who have proven only their loyalty to Donald Trump.

So that's what's happening. It's the story of Donald Trump and it's playing out on December 23rd.

VELSHI: Almost exactly a year ago, Donald Trump pardoned the Navy SEAL Eddie Gallagher. And military people at the time told us that while the president is the commander-in-chief and you want him supporting military people, this -- when you support people who do really bad things, it's bad for the military.

The president has now pardoned four Blackwater contractors, not members of the American military but contracted to the American military, for crimes they committed in 2007 in Iraq. The murders they are accused of are heinous.

CROW: Yeah, they are. I mean, the commander-in-chief is supposed to set the tone for our military. It starts from the top. I learned this as an Army Ranger in Iraq and Afghanistan that the foundation of leadership is leadership by example. He set the tone and the tenor.

We have men and women around the world right now who are executing U.S. foreign policy defending our nation on the tip of the sphere of our national security, and we're telling them to abide by international laws and norms, to abide by U.S. laws, to execute their duties with morality and with ethics, and you have a commander-in-chief who is sending the exact opposite message. That if you abuse those things, if you disregard international law and norms and ethics, that in his eyes and his world, that's okay.

It's an exceptionally dangerous message, and it's one that we're going to have to embark on a repair job over the next couple of years to have better leadership at every level within the military to say this is not okay. We're going to have to have a reset on January 20th to kind of rebuild some of our norms and traditions that are so critical to defending our nation.

VELSHI: Yeah, and it's mixed messages. If you're a man or woman who wears the uniform of the United States or you're a veteran, the president at various times has called people losers and wondered what their motivation is for going to fight on the part of the country.

So he's not coming out on the right side of either side of this with the military and yet he fancies himself a champion of the military.

CROW: Yeah, he does. I mean, again that's the story of Donald Trump. He is incapable of loyalty to anything other than himself, whether it's our servicemen and women, whether it's the way he's embarked on these pardoned, whether it's using hundreds of millions of dollars of national security funds to actually coerce an ally at war to help him win a political campaign.

Over and over, it's all about Donald Trump. I'm glad it's going to end on January 20th, but the message that he sent and the danger of this stuff becoming normal is a very real danger.

I think we have to send a message to the American people that none of this is okay. This is not okay. It wasn't okay prior to 2016, and it's not okay right now.

We have to make sure that we're getting folks in place that can actually push back on this and reset those norms to where they have been prior to 2016 in the Trump era so we can actually engage in this rebuilding of our country.

VELSHI: Well, on this day before Christmas Eve, let's at least remember and thank those service members who are out there around the world keeping America safe regardless of the politics going on at home.

Congressman, good to see you. Thank you for being with us. Congressman Jason Crow of Colorado was a former Army Ranger.

Up next, Speaker Pelosi versus Donald Trump. While Americans are hiding from the president's veto threat on COVID relief, Pelosi is running circles around the Trump -- around Trump and Republicans. Can she actually turn the Trump-created chaos into more money for Americans who actually need it? That's next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

VELSHI: There is a chaos on Capitol Hill tonight. Millions of Americans will now not get economic relief for which they are so desperate, or at least those checks won't get sent out next week because there is no bill passed to determine how much those checks will be.

The government also needs to be funded. No one knows if any of that is going to happen, thanks to Donald Trump.

At the 11th hour last night, Trump threatened to blow up the coronavirus relief package that took months to craft, calling for $2,000 per person in direct payment checks to Americans people who qualify.

Now, to be absolutely clear, that's a substantially better amount of money than the paltry $600 that they all agreed to, but $600 is all Republicans would agree to. And so that's what got passed by both chambers of Congress.

Now, what caused this last-minute change, you ask? Well, Trump decided to play president for a night and insert himself into delicate legislative negotiation that he took no part in whatsoever before last night. He had delegated Mark Meadows and Steven Mnuchin to do it.

Now he wants to weigh in after months of silence. And of course, chaos isn't always a bad thing. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is trying to place this debacle to Democrats' advantage. She's calling Trump's bluff.

In a letter to her Democratic colleagues, Speaker Pelosi committed to passing the $2,000 checks by unanimous consent on Christmas Eve tomorrow if Republicans go along with it. Pelosi made it clear that the GOP is now responsible saying, quote, "If the president truly wants to join us in $2,000 payments, he should call upon Leader McCarthy to agree to our unanimous consent request," end quote.

Feign shock with me, if you will, but Republicans in Congress have been silent on this. They have not offered any response. This vote is supposed to be tomorrow and they haven't got anything to say about this.

Calling Trump's bluff means that the GOP is now officially between a rock and a hard place, because do you side with Trump and Pelosi and give far more to Americans than you ever wanted to give, or do you side against them and risk Americans getting no check whatsoever?

You would think the answer would be pretty self-explanatory for Republicans, but doing good for people in need is not the GOP's strong suit today. So what's it going to be? Decisions, decisions.

Leading off our discussion tonight: Ambassador Wendy Sherman, former undersecretary of State for political affairs. She's now advising the Biden transition team. She's no longer an MSNBC contributor. And former congressman David Jolly of Florida who left the Republican Party in 2018. He is an MSNBC political analyst.

Welcome to both of you tonight.

Ambassador Sherman, this is actually Nancy Pelosi's sweet spot. She knows how to count votes. She understands that Democrats have been asking for a much larger check for Americans for a long time. They actually passed a bill on October 1st that was several times the size of this one.

And now Donald Trump has walked into this thing and said we want $2,000. She says, we'll give you $2,000. Call a vote. Tell your people to get on our side with this thing. What happens next?

WENDY SHERMAN, MEMBER, JOE BIDEN TRANSITION TEAM: Well, I think one thing that Donald Trump should have learned by now is never to count Nancy Pelosi out. She is a master of the House, as David Jolly knows quite well.

And indeed, what she tweeted tonight was, Mr. President, sign the bill so that the government can function. Because as you pointed out, Ali, this bill is both COVID relief and the final budget legislation that makes the government function, and you can't get those checks out whether they're $600 or $2,000 if there is no government funded and no government functioning.

So she said sign the bill and then call Leader McCarthy, call Majority Leader McConnell and tell them to join the Democrats' unanimous consent for $2,000. We can get it done by noon on Christmas eve. Very smart politics, and I think she understands that President Trump doesn't mean a thing by this.

He got on the plane to Mar-A-Lago. Has he called Senator McConnell? Has he called Mr. McCarthy, Congressman McCarthy? Has he called Speaker Pelosi? Has he done anything to lift a finger not only to keep the government functioning so it can send out checks but to get people the desperate need that they have, get them any check and then get to that $2,000.

VELSHI: We just heard from Kevin McCarthy now, the House Republican leader who has said that they are not going to join Democrats in a unanimous consent motion to get this $2,000 done. It's a letter, "a dear colleague" letter.

David Jolly, help me with this one. Help me understand this because for a long, long time after the bill was passed in Congress October 1st, Mitch McConnell kept on saying, without naming names, he said, I've got people in my Republican conference and senate who will not go for a lot of money for Americans. Either because they don't want to encourage the laziness, I suppose that the signal that sends or they don't want to run up the debt. Not a problem that they had with the tax cuts.

What's happening now? What has happened here? Because McConnell and Trump have been in lockstep for the better part of four years, and now they're entirely on opposite sides of this situation.

DAVID JOLLY, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Look, for Mitch McConnell it's been a marriage of necessity, not one of respect, and I think what you're seeing is Mitch McConnell knows what the rest of the country knows, which is Donald Trump is on his way out the door and Mitch McConnell will remain majority leader.

Ali, there is a statement in the Senate that presidents come and go but Senators stay forever. That's largely Mitch McConnell's thinking right now.

But if we go to what happens next on this, and you mentioned McCarthy is just out with a statement, and it's an interesting statement in the way McCarthy actually dismisses both Pelosi and Trump to show that he's been totally left out of conversations with the White House.

McCarthy is saying, not only are we going to vote no on the $2,000 a month stimulus payment, but what Trump really meant, Speaker Pelosi, is that he wants us to reduce foreign aid.

So House Republicans apparently are going to offer an alternative motion to reduce foreign aid and that apparently is going to address the needs of the American people in the pandemic.

Look, I don't think the votes are there in the Senate for $2,000 a month payments. Nor are they there -- they will be there among House Democrats but not with House Republicans. What Donald Trump is doing is he's going out as he came in with this meandering populism that's immersed in self-promotion and he's trying to leave saying look, I tried to do more than even Nancy Pelosi or Mitch McConnell or Joe Biden tried to do.

VELSHI: Yes. Too bad there's actually records of what Democrats has passed in the House on October 1st.

Wendy Sherman, it's convenient that McCarthy's put this statement out. Maybe he knew you were going to be on show with me because this is your wheelhouse.

He says House Democrats appear to be suffering from selective hearing. They've conveniently ignored the concerns expressed by the president, as Mr. Jolly was just saying, and shared by our constituents that we ought to reexamine how our tax dollars are spent overseas while so many of our neighbors at home are struggling to make ends meet.

Thus Republicans will offer a unanimous consent request to revisit the state and foreign operations title of the omnibus so that we can fully address the concerns at hand.

David, I'm glad you brought that up.

Ambassador Sherman, what's he talking about. How did this get into the discussion.

SHERMAN: I think this got into the discussion because President thought that this would pull on the chain for the populism that David Jolly just spoke to. In fact, foreign assistance is really assistance that helps the taxpayers of the United States of America and it's less than 1 percent. 1 percent of what we spend in all of our budget. It's very little money.

I know Americans think it's a great deal more, and we do it to help Americans abroad. We do it to help businesses get into markets and sell American products. We do it so that America's farmers can sell wheat abroad. We do it so that Americans who are traveling have support when they get stuck or when they may be in another country and can't get home because of COVID.

Yes, we do it to help developing countries at times, but we do that because we want to make sure that democracy grows around the world, because when there is a middle class, then they buy American goods.

So at the end of the day, what we spend overseas is to help Americans at home, and it's also to support our military, as you were just talking with Congressman Crow (ph) in that terrific discussion you had with him. We want to support our military overseas and that's done in concert with diplomats and that costs a little bit of money.

VELSHI: You know, I've been traveling this country for months, talking to small businesses and workers and so many of them were counting -- it was paltry, the $600. But they were counting on it. And now there are small businesses and people out of work across America wondering how they make it to the end of the year.

The night before Christmas Eve, and this is what we're doing.

Ambassador Wendy Sherman, pleasure to see you again thank you. David Jolly, thanks for your insight as always. Thanks for joining us.

After this break, we're going to have very important conversations about COVID, isolation, the holidays and your mental health. This year has been an extreme challenge for millions.

Our next guest, psychologist Angela Duckworth will join us to discuss what you need to do to prioritize your mental health as the pandemic rages worse than ever.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

VELSHI: This is an important week. In addition to us ringing in the end of the year, it's of deep spiritual importance to Jews and Christians and to folks who aren't part of a religious tradition, it's a time associated with friends and family. It's also a time we couldn't have imagined nine months ago.

Though it was never likely, some thought the pandemic would abate by summer and be over by Labor Day. When that didn't happen, some hoped Thanksgiving would be safe for family gathering but it wasn't. Now Hanukkah and Christmas will pass by so many.

These are challenging times. People are scared. People we know are getting sick, some are dying, and even if we and the people we love have been fortunate enough to escape the virus' wrath so far, we live in a near constant state of being infected.

But know this, all this stuff you're feeling, all of these fears, you're not alone. You're not alone if you feel depressed or anxious or unmoored. You're not alone in spending the holidays in social isolation away from so many of the people you love. And you're not alone in dreading that the darkest days of this pandemic are still to come.

Those fears, of course, are compounded by the people who don't listen to the experts, who ignore warnings to stay home. More people have traveled in the last five days than all those who traveled around the Thanksgiving holiday.

Today Joe Biden's pick for CDC director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky, told us what to expect as a result of this ignorance.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DR. ROCHELLE WALENSKY, CDC DIRECTOR NOMINEE: I do think that we're going to have more deaths and more surge after the Christmas and New Year's holidays. And all of those are going to manifest on, you know, around the end of January.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

VELSHI: As we face this grim reality, it is crucial to practice self-care and to find glimmers of hope. And here's one of those glimmers. More than a million people in the United States have now received the coronavirus vaccine. Pfizer agreed today to supply the United States with 100 million more doses of vaccine by the end of July, averting a potential shortfall in the spring and summer months.

With some luck, we will not be spending next Christmas talking about this, or at least we'll be talking about it in the rearview mirror.

My next guest, Angela Duckworth has dedicated her career to mental health and to be -- being able to reach deep inside yourself to find the strength and power to overcome things you never expected to face.

And she had to do that herself this year. She lost her 87-year-old father to COVID-19 in April in the early days of this pandemic.

Joining me now is Angela Duckworth. She is a professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania and the founder of the Character Lab. She is the author of the "New York Times" Bestseller "Grit: the Power of Passion and Perseverance". And if you haven't read the book yet, it came out a few years ago. If you haven't read it, this is the year to do it.

Professor Duckworth, thank you for being with us. And you know, there are times when someone with your level of education comes on the show and people say, this is not the experience most people have.

Except in this particular case, in terms of the dealing with the grief and the pressures of coronavirus, it has been your experience kind of from the beginning. Your father passed in April.

ANGELA DUCKWORTH, FOUNDER, CHARACTER LAB: Yes, I think my father was one of the early victims passing in early April. Although I should say at the age of 87, so there has certainly been more tragic cases during the pandemic. And my 85-year-old mother is still with us.

But, yes, I've had my story. I will tell you, I hope 2020 is the year of empathy because if anything, this teaches us that each of us really does carry our own burden.

VELSHI: Let's talk about dealing with these things. Your mother is dealing with the loss of your father. You wrote that there was no funeral, but she could paint and she could plant a tree. The dedication reads "Babylonica weeping willow in memory of Yeng Kao Lee" (ph) painted in 2020.

Let's just talk about how we are supposed to deal with these things. For some of us, it's actual grief of losing someone. For others, there's a feeling that experts have told me feels a lot like grief even if you're not dealing with the death of a person because everything you know about life has changed. And for others it's anxiety and it's mental anguish.

What can we do in these moments? We know that the end of this is coming, but it may be many months.

DUCKWORTH: Yes, I went to school to get a PhD in psychology, but sometimes I think I could have just, you know, sat and watched my mom and she probably would have taught me everything I need to know.

So just, you know, my mom's story with losing my dad, they lived in the same, like, senior retirement home. She was in independent living, he was in the highest level of care. And until he died, actually it was her routine every day to basically, you know, walk back and forth. I think she probably logged miles everyday from her independent section to his.

And then when he passed, which happens sometimes like very suddenly from COVID, if I just take a page out of her playbook, like how did my mother deal with that grief, you know, there was certainly the shock, there was certainly, you know, the sadness.

But I have to say, you know, my mother's attention went very quickly to, you know, how this was a blessing that my father had been in a lot of pain in his final months and years. She, you know, thought of like good memories, and then she did, she got out her paintbrushes, and the painting she made actually in honor of my dad is a peacock feather which is kind of an inside joke because my dad was a bit of a peacock.

And she planted a tree. She planted a tree that she thought he would like. So I think it's not to deny that we are sad and that we have lost, but I do think to the extent that we can draw our attention to something positive and, you know, it gets us out of the hole.

VELSHI: So we describe these things, as we describe people who can do that, as strong. And we worry about people who can't do it as weak.

Your book actually speaks to the idea fact that we've kind of all got this in us.

DUCKWORTH: I do think people are stronger than we think. And, you know, what you said, Ali, about not feeling alone like feeling if you're -- you know, when Michelle Obama said in, I think it was a podcast or maybe she tweeted it. It was a couple of months ago, she said like oh, gosh, this is getting to me. I'm feeling a little depressed.

I think there are a lot of people whose like shoulder softened and felt like it's not just me.

And I think that's very important. At the same time, I think we should realize that we do have inner strength. And the vast majority of people actually are resilient. So resilience is actually the norm, not the exception.

VELSHI: How do you deal with the idea that you can't dodge these feelings? After nine months of this and maybe six more months of quarantine or some version of it to come. You can't dodge it. You can't avoid it. You can't pretend it's not there.

And when you get these feelings of anxiety and loneliness and depression, you kind of have to hold the feeling. You have to kind of own it and know that in 20 years, you'll talk about what it felt like in 2020.

DUCKWORTH: Yes. By the way, the mental time travel idea of like what will I look back on 2020 as -- what will the story be that I tell, you know? Depending on your stage of life you might think grandchildren.

I think it's actually very helpful. Because one of the things that helps people manage negative emotions is actually temporal perspective. So that's fancy schmancy psychology world. Basically like when we have some distance in time from what we're experiencing, we can manage those emotions better.

And you can even know how to do this yourself, not by removing yourself from 2020 right now truly, but removing yourself from 2020 mentally, and going into the future and saying in 2040, when I look back, you know, what will be, you know, the story I tell? What will I be proud to say about how I managed things?

VELSHI: That's exactly what I've done this year. I've thought about the fact that this will be the year that we talk about for the next 50 years. So what's -- I like to spin a bit of a yarn. What will the yarn be? What is the information that we got this year that we will tell people who didn't live through it?

Angela, good to see you again. Thank you, and our condolences to you and your family. Your father was a great man. But a lot of people who have shiny cars, by the way, have him to thank for it, because of the invention that he was involved in right here in Philadelphia in making car paint better. So thank you.

DUCKWORTH: And Ali, can I tell you how happy he would be to just know that you said that and that he's being remembered. So thank you so much, Ali.

VELSHI: You stay safe. We'll talk again.

Angela Duckworth is a professor at the University of Pennsylvania.

When we come back a special LAST WORD from Lawrence.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

VELSHI: Before we go, a plea for help. We're not the only nation ravaged by COVID-19. The consequences of this are far and wide.

In Malawi one of the poorest countries in the world, 7.7 million school age children were at home for more than seven months due to the pandemic.

But you can help. Here's a special LAST WORD from Lawrence about how the KIND Fund, KIND stands for Kids in Need of Desks, is helping students maintain social distancing in classrooms.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

LAWRENCE O'DONNELL, MSNBC HOST: For ten years, viewers of this program have been supporting the KIND Fund, Kids in Need of Desks, the partnership I created between MSNBC and UNICEF to provide desks to schools in Malawi that have never had desks and scholarships for girls to attend high school in Malawi where public high school is not free and the graduation rate for girls is half the graduation rate for boys.

Victoria Kayma (ph) is a student in the Sumazi primary school, school where the students are learning lessons that they're bringing home to their families about how to stop the spread of COVID-19.

VICTORIA KAYMA, STUDENT: The school has taught us ways to prevent COVID-19. First we have been told to always put on a mask when in public.

Secondly we are required to wash hands with soap before going into the classroom.

Thirdly we have been told that COVID-19 is real and deadly.

O'DONNELL: You can go to lastworddesks.MSNBC.com and give a desk or a girl scholarship as a gift to anyone on your holiday gift list and UNICEF will send them an acknowledgement of your gift.

No contribution toward a desk or a scholarship is too small.

Elizabeth Kalele, the head teacher at Sumazi primary school told us that the new desks are more important than ever because without them, it would be very difficult to maintain social distance in the classroom.

ELIZABETH KALELE, HEAD TEACHER: It would be very difficult one just because these learners were just being packed in a room. It would be a difficult thing for them to have a one-meter spacing. It would be a difficult thing for them.

O'DONNELL: Your continued generous support of the KIND Fund has made this very difficult year a little bit easier for thousands of students and teachers in Malawi, who always express their gratitude in song.

(MUSIC)

BRIAN WILLIAMS, MSNBC HOST: Well, good evening once again.

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.END

Content and programming copyright 2020 MSNBC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Copyright 2020 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.