IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

The Last Word with Lawrence O'Donnell, Transcript 02/04/15

Guests: Phyllis Bennis, Michael Kay, Alan Diehl, Jordan Schultz, BruceBeck, Eve Ensler

LAWRENCE O`DONNELL, MSNBC HOST: Rachel, no one would have noticed were it not for you. RACHEL MADDOW, "TRMS" HOST: Well, I`m a little fixated. I`ve got to admit. O`DONNELL: Great job. Thank you, Rachel. MADDOW: Thanks. O`DONNELL: Today, King Abdullah of Jordan called for a relentless war against the Islamic State. Last night, the king ordered the executions of two terrorist prisoners in response to a 22-minute video showing a Jordanian combat pilot being burned to death. Now, the White House is considering its next move. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) ADM. JOHN KIRBY, PENTAGON SPOKESMAN: President Obama said today that the U.S. was going to double down on the efforts to defeat and degrade ISIS or ISIL. What does that mean? REPORTER: What does that mean? KIRBY: You know, we don`t talk about future operations, Jim. There`s been a long concerted effort here over the last seven months to degrade and destroy their capabilities. Nothing is going to slow down about that. We`re going to continue to put as much pressure on them as possible, with our partners in Iraq and in Syria. JOSH EARNEST, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: We did see reports that the Jordanian government did carry out the execution of two prisoners. These were two individuals that did go through the Jordanian justice system. REPORTER: So, the White House is not criticizing this, unlike the European Union? EARNEST: Jean, I refer you to Jordanian authorities. ASHTON CARTER, DEFENSE SECRETARY NOMINEE: We need partners on the ground to beat ISIS. SEN. JOHN MCCAIN (R), ARIZONA: Do you believe that we need to have a strategy to combat ISIS? CARTER: Absolutely. MCCAIN: What do you understand the strategy to be? CARTER: Mr. Chairman, in Iraq, the force that will keep them defeated is the Iraqi security forces. That`s our strategy is to strengthen them. We are trying to build the force that will keep them defeated, and that`s going to be a combination of moderate Syrian forces and regional forces. MCCAIN: Well, it sounds like - -it doesn`t sound like a strategy to me, it sounds like a series of goals to me. (END VIDEOTAPE) O`DONNELL: There is one remaining American hostage held by the Islamic State. In a "Foreign Policy" magazine article entitled "Can the Islamic State`s Last Hostages be Saved?", a report says a rescue by elite military forces could be the only realistic hope of survival for the group`s one known remaining American hostage, a 26-year-old female aid worker who the U.S. government believes was alive as recently as two weeks ago. A former office with the military`s Joint Special Operations Command said that even with fully accurate intelligence on the woman`s location, a rescue mission`s chances of success would be less than 50 percent. Joining me now, Phyllis Bennis of the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington, and Michael Kay, an international affairs correspondent and former senior British officer and military strategist. Michael, this question of now that we`re down to, as far as we know, one American hostage left, and maybe 20 overall is the rough count they think they have, the Islamic State, the question is coming up again, is a rescue possible? MICHAEL KAY, INTL. AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT: I would actually put it less than 50 percent, Lawrence. I would put it maybe at 10 percent. There`s a very good reason for that. It`s because ISIS has become very adept at moving themselves around, they don`t stay in a location more than two or three days. That`s key for Special Forces who are trying to get fixation, or a target fixation (INAUDIBLE) to any form intelligence. What`s absolutely which they`re lacking as well is what`s called human, which is human intelligence. Human intelligence is a huge part of allowing Western forces to be able to operate effectively against targets, whether in Afghanistan or whether it`s in Iraq. There`s a vacuum in Syria, because everyone has been brainwashed by the ISIS ideology, especially in the areas that they are operating in, whether Aleppo or Raqqa, (INAUDIBLE) which is coming right down in the middle of Syria. So I think the chances are very, very slim. John Cantlie is the other guy that is also very prominent in the news is the U.K. journalist that ISIS have been using quite uniquely in terms of his skill set of being a journalist, and being able to spread that propaganda with an English voice to the West. What`s interesting here, Lawrence, we are down to about two. One of the key things that ISIS can do is they can infect and recruit by leveraging Western media with these hostages. But they`re down to the last two. So, I think in terms of what we do next, in terms of how we counter their ideology, we have to look at what their critical capabilities are. This is one. The other one is using social media. The other one is leveraging disenfranchised individuals and foreign countries. And then the last one is socio-economic problems. And I think the non-military options that we need to be looking at in terms of this holistic approach to counter ISIS. O`DONNELL: Phyllis Bennis, in "The New York Times" today, there was a piece by Kenneth Pollack which begins by saying, American forces appear to be turning the tide against the Islamic State. Do you see it that way? PHYLLIS BENNIS, INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES: No, unfortunately I don`t. I think we have to be very clear that, as President Obama himself has said over and over again, there is no military solution here. The fact is, you cannot bomb terrorism out of existence. You don`t bomb terrorism, you bomb cities. You bomb people. And you kill them. That doesn`t, in the long run, or even in the medium term here, that doesn`t end the horrific realities of what ISIS is doing to people in that region. We`re looking at a scenario, we`re getting new figures that have come out in some of the congressional hearings, indicating that the Pentagon claims they have killed somewhere in the area of 6,000 ISIS fighters, maybe that`s accurate, maybe it`s not. I`m not sure. But they also admit that somewhere between 4,000, 5,000 just foreign forces have already replaced those dead fighters for ISIS. That`s not even counting additional local fighters who have been recruited by the numbers among other things, of civilians who have been killed in the bombings. So, the notion that somehow we are degrading ISIS is not the case. You cannot use a military weapon to try and go after an ideology. I think what Michael just said is right, except I think it has to start with take away the military option. You don`t sort of add on to it and hope it works. The military option has failed. It failed in Iraq for over a decade. It`s failed in Afghanistan for over 13 years. Remember, Lawrence, we were told that the numbers of al Qaeda forces in Afghanistan, because the U.S. had been so successful, was down to somewhere between 50 and 100 guys. And yet we kept at that time, it was still over 100,000 troops in Afghanistan for those 50 guys. And in the meantime, while we have killed however many members of al Qaeda, al Qaeda-like organizations and organizations that grew out of al Qaeda like ISIS have sprung up throughout the region. So, calling that a victory is a very mistaken approach. O`DONNELL: Michael, to be care to Kenneth Pollack, he does say that a military mission alone cannot be successful. It does require political elements and all sorts of healing politically within Iraq that we see no evidence of. In addition to the very, very public things like these beheadings and then this burning video that we saw, we have a report from the United Nations about what the Islamic State is doing that we don`t see, that they are not seeking Western publicity for. The United States saying the Islamic State militants are selling abducted Iraqi children at markets as sex slaves and killing other youth, including by crucifixion or burying them alive. This is not a group that is trying to win hearts and minds. This is a group that is working it seems entirely on fear. KAY: Let`s be absolutely clear here, Lawrence. ISIS, ISIL, or Daesh, the Arabic acronym, it is a cult. If you`re a Sunni, you`re not safe. If you`re a Shia, you`re not safe. If you`re a Christian, you`re not safe. If you`re Yazidi, you`re not safe. If you`re a Jew, you`re not safe. If you are Russian, you`re not safe. If you`re European, you`re not safe. If you`re American, you`re not safe. If you`re Saudi, you`re not safe. It goes on and on. The point is, this is a global threat, and a global threat requires a multifaceted and a multilayered and multilateral response. Not just regional. Regional is key and they should be taking the lead. Saudi Arabia should be taking the lead. UAE should be taking the lead. Jordan should all be there. Egypt, pivotal. But we also need Russia. We need international legitimacy to try and work on a political road map, a political roadmap cannot be sanctioned unless you have agreement on the permanent five on the U.N. Security Council. Without Russia`s buy-in, we won`t be able to get that. Assad is a critical component of this problem. Going back to what Phyllis was saying, I don`t share exactly that view. I think the military do have a role, but whatever the military does has to be fused to a political road map. And without that political road map, any military action is short-term. It is useful. We have just seen Kobani. Kobani has been liberated by the Syrian Kurds on the ground and by coalition airstrikes going in. I mean, Kobani is leveled from the air strikes, I mean, that`s another conversation in itself. BENNIS: That`s the same conversation. KAY: But what we need is a political road map. So there are geopolitical problems that we have to get around. Russia, Ukraine, we have to look at Iran and the nuclear problem. Saudi Arabia and exporting Wahhabism. Let`s leverage Egypt a bit more. We need to galvanize this and we need to work our way, a coordinated effort to attack ISIS globally. O`DONNELL: And, Phyllis, all of these elements have been floating around these issues for years, everything that Michael just identified. And certainly American strategists have never been able to come up with something cohesive that held onto every one of those moving parts at the same time. BENNIS: And I think part of the problem, Lawrence, is precisely the focus on the military. You`re right that these ideas have come and gone. We`ve seen them in various proposals, but they all say when we start to have a policy based on vengeance, we`re hearing it again after the horrific murder of the Jordanian bomber pilot, we are hearing again we have to destroy them. You can`t build a strategy out of vengeance, which is what we`re starting to hear once again. Unfortunately, as long as the focus remains on the military, the other issues that are so important, questions of what do you do about a cease- fire, how do you get a cease-fire in Syria? How do you work on an arms embargo on all sides? I absolutely agree with Michael. We need to be engaging with Russia. We need to be engaging with Iran. But you don`t do that. You`re not going to get Russia to sign on what`s known as a Chapter 7 resolution at the United Nations that would set the stage to authorize more military force. You might have a chance to engage Russia if you said, let`s not talk about the military, let`s talk about how to get a cease-fire. The United Nations is taking the lead in trying to make some arrangements for temporary cease- fires in some small areas of Syria as starting point. We should be supporting that, instead of saying new bombing in Syria, let`s see what we can do to encourage cease-fires. Maybe a cease-fire in some areas could lead to talk of an arms embargo. That`s not going to happen right away either, but we need to have that on the table, something we`re moving towards, because otherwise, we keep falling into the same trap that George Bush posed to us, that we either go to war or let him get away with it. That`s never the choice. It wasn`t the only choice then. It`s not the only choice now. And as long as we keep the focus on what is our military going to do, how many new ways can we talk about, we`re going to fail at the political side. We will not win support from Iraqi Sunnis, as long as we are bombing Iraqi Sunni towns. When the hospital in Fallujah gets bombed, we`re not going to win supporters away from ISIS, we`re driving people right into their arms. O`DONNELL: Michael Kay, quickly before we go, what do you expect from King Abdullah next? KAY: It`s the million dollar question. And, again, I think Jordan, on its own, isn`t going to be able to kill this problem. Jordan has to reach out to Saudi. Jordan has to corral the regional partners to be able to get everyone around the table and say, politically what are we going to do here? I do think there are ideas to explore, leaving off from Phyllis. One of them is decentralized governance. The mission in Afghanistan in the last 12 years was about centralized government, what`s about extending the reach from Kabul out to the provinces, the districts. That doesn`t work when you have effectively a country full of tribal units that transcend national boundaries. So, maybe decentralized governments coming out of Damascus might be a way forward. But again, hugely complex issue that needs military and political solutions. O`DONNELL: Michael Kay and Phyllis Bennis, thank you both very much for joining us tonight. KAY: Thank you. O`DONNELL: Thank you. BENNIS: Thank you. O`DONNELL: Coming up, another tragic and deadly plane crash in Asia. And later, the biggest loser in the world finally speaks. The Seattle Seahawks coach who called the play that gave the Super Bowl to the Patriots told Matt Lauer what that moment felt like. And in the "Rewrite" tonight, the bravest kissers in the world. The guy sitting behind them in that photo -- oh, get that photo back up. That guy hitting behind them in that photo now wants to put those women in jail. And later, the brilliant Eve Ensler, the author of "The Vagina Monologues" will tell us what she has planned for V-Day this year. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) O`DONNELL: Tonight, medical examiners are using family dental records to identify the rest of the victims of a deadly commuter train crash that happened just north of New York City last night. Witnesses say an SUV was sitting on the track when the crossing arm came down on the rear of the vehicle. The driver got out to check for damage, then inched forward into the path of an oncoming train. Tonight, the death toll stands at six. The names released so far include that driver, 49-year-old Ellen Brody, mother of three, 53-year-old Eric Vandercar, father of two, and 69-year-old Walter Liedtke, a curator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. NBC News Jeff Rossen explains how tragedies like this can happen. (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE) JEFF ROSSEN, NBC NEWS (voice-over): Right now, officials are investigating the deadly crash in upstate New York, trying to figure out exactly what went wrong. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: There was a loud bam, like an explosion-type thing. And then once we jumped off on the side, there was another explosion. ROSSEN: And it`s happened before. Check out this dramatic video from inside a train crash just outside of Orlando last May that demolished a sports coupe. The car stalled on a railroad crossing just before the gates came down. The driver got out with seconds to spare. Just last month in Houston, a mother, father, and six children escaped injury when this freight train struck their car and another crossing. Officers say the conductor sounded the horn several times, but the two cars didn`t move in time. And then in Glendale, California, an SUV stuck on the tracks caused this commuter train to derail. Hitting trains on both sides of it, killing 11 people. UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Almost like a pretzel. I came off the chair and I was just tumbling basically the hallway. ROSSEN: According to the Federal Railroad Administration, more than 230 people were killed in nearly 2,100 collisions nationwide last year alone. Vehicles stopped on the track for any number of reasons. For mechanical failure to intentional thrill seeking. But what if you get stuck on the track? Experts say you should be aware that trains cannot stop quickly, so don`t expect them to stop on a dime. Get everyone out and immediately off the tracks. Leave your possessions in the car, don`t take anything with you. And once you`re out, experts say you should actually run toward the direction of the oncoming train off to the side. It may seem counterintuitive, but you`re running away from the collision site and any flying debris from your car. (END VIDEOTAPE) O`DONNELL: That was NBC`s Jeff Rossen. Coming up, the tragic video of the TransAsia plane crash. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) O`DONNELL: In Taiwan, 12 passengers from TransAsia Flight 235 are still missing tonight after the commercial plane crashed after takeoff. Automobile dash board cameras captured the final moments as the wing and tail of the plane hit a freeway and fell into the river below. The plane`s final communication was a mayday sent to air traffic control, which one of the pilots said they had, quote, "an engine flameout." Thirty-one of the 58 people on board were killed, but 15 survivors, including a 2-year-old child. They were pulled from the wreckage, and taken to local hospitals. Search and rescue crews have recovered the black boxes and an investigation is under way. This is the second TransAsia plane to crash in less than a year. Joining me now is former investigator for the NTSB and Air Force, Alan Diehl. He is the author of "Air Safety Investigators." Alan, what do you make of that mayday message engine flameout? ALAN DIEHL, AIR SAFETY EXPERT: Clearly, Lawrence, they lost one of their engines. It`s been reported that it was probably the left engine. That`s very interesting, because when you lose an engine, you`re not supposed to turn towards the engine that`s failed. They tell you to raise the dead engine, in other words, lift that wing. This captain was in a very precarious situation. He had buildings to his right and he had to make a calculated decision to turn into that dead engine and save the people in that building and abort the aircraft, but running at great risk of losing control of the aircraft. O`DONNELL: So, Alan, when you look at that video, you`re seeing what you believe is a deliberate turn, not a plane out of control turning against the will of the pilot. DIEHL: Lawrence, it`s obviously very hard to tell and the recorders will tell the story. We always say that the flight data recorder tells you what happened. The cockpit voice recorder tells you why. But there may have been some conversation, and I`m speculating here, that captain, we can`t turn right, the buildings or something like that. O`DONNELL: Yes. DIEHL: That`s why they may have consciously turned to the left against the basic rules about never turn into a dead engine. Never turn in that direction. O`DONNELL: But that could have been, if deliberate, a life-saving decision for other people. In other words, making that calculation, we absolutely must not go into the building, that could lead to more loss of life. DIEHL: Exactly, Lawrence. We know that Captain Sullenberger had that same decision over Manhattan there. That`s one thing that all pilots try to do is protect the people on the ground, as well as their passengers. But we don`t know, at this point we don`t really know. It`s possible there may have been a malfunctioning propeller system on that left engine. When you lose an engine, they`re supposed to go into what`s called feather, and the blades align with the swoop stream, or the air stream, and that reduces resistance. That may not have happened. It looked like that. I couldn`t tell from the photographs or videos, but maybe there was a mechanical problem with that left engine. We still don`t know so much about this, Lawrence. We`re only speculating at this point. O`DONNELL: But there are scenarios which you could lose that engine and safely proceed, even at that point in takeoff? DIEHL: Absolutely. They climbed to 1,300 feet. Again, this is data reported. And normally, that would be enough to safely conduct an emergency procedure, and take the aircraft around and land it. But obviously something very wrong happened. We don`t know if perhaps -- I`m speculating here, but on the leeward side of those building, but may have caused turbulence, causing more problems. But we don`t know if there`s a mechanical factor on top of basic engine failure, if that propeller did not properly feather, we may have had a real difficult situation for anybody to handle. O`DONNELL: I was on a flight once out of Washington, D.C., it was a two- engine plane, lost an engine, and it felt like the plane was going in reverse. It wasn`t, but that`s the shocking sensation in the loss of momentum from just the loss of one engine. DIEHL: Absolutely. Of course, you want to twist towards the dead engine. That`s what you try to avoid as a pilot. O`DONNELL: Alan Diehl, thank you very much for joining us tonight. Coming up next, an NBC News exclusive. The Seattle Seahawks coach talks about the play that lost the Super Bowl, the play that he called. And in the "Rewrite" tonight, how brave do you have to be to kiss your girlfriend in public? Well, if you do it in Russia, there`s a guy there who might want to send you to jail for that. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) O`DONNELL: In the "Spotlight" tonight, the worst call ever by a head coach in a Super Bowl, or was it? With 26 seconds left to go in the game on Sunday night, the Seattle Seahawks were 36 inches from a second straight Super Bowl victory win. Coach Pete Carroll sent in the play that gave the ball and the game to the Patriots. Instead of doing what the world expected, handing the ball to star running back Marshawn Lynch to pick up a yard, Pete Carroll ordered a quick pass over the goal line that was snatched by the Patriots` Malcolm Butler. As great as that moment felt for Patriots` fans, and as horrific as it felt for Seahawks` fans, imagine, imagine how it felt for the man responsible for tossing away a Super Bowl victory. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) MATT LAUER, MSNBC`S "TODAY" SHOW: Take me back to when you weren`t right. I watched your expression as you saw that play unfold. And you bent over at the waist and my heart broke for you. To be perfectly honest. How were you feeling inside? PETE CARROLL, SEATTLE SEAHAWKS HEAD COACH: Immediately, I mean, within the instant of the turnover, the gravity of what just happened, and I understood. And there`s only a second or two before you stand up and start looking ahead and getting ready for what`s coming. (END VIDEO CLIP) O`DONNELL: You can see more of Matt Lauer`s exclusive interview with Pete Carroll on the "TODAY" show tomorrow morning. Joining me now from Seattle is Huffington Post sports columnist Jordan Schultz and here in New York WNBC`s lead sports anchor Bruce Beck. Jordan, you`re in Seattle. I imagine exactly no one in Seattle has gotten over this yet. JORDAN SCHULTZ, HUFFINGTON POST SPORTS COLUMNIST: Lawrence, you`re 100 percent right there. I was actually at the game in Phoenix, and Patriot fans were getting ready to leave, because the game was over. And so I`m here to tell you that I can`t possibly defend, as a Seattleite, and a lifelong Seahawks fan, to be honest, what happened on the one-yard line. He said 36 inches, I think it was even closer. Regardless, Ricardo Lockette had 11 catches all season long in the regular season. If you`re going to throw that play, you`ve got to go on a -- roll Russell Wilson out, a much less risk play, throw it up to Chris Matthews, 100 yards of the game, he`s 6`5", and live to play another down there. Obviously he didn`t do that, and here we are. O`DONNELL: Bruce Beck, there`s a very interesting kind of revisionist history coming up here now, defending this call, saying look, this -- if incomplete, it stops the clock, they needed the clock to stop, so that they could regroup for what would be that handoff that gets you the yard. BRUCE BECK, WNBC-TV SPORTS ANCHOR: Pete Carroll said we`re going to run the ball, but it wasn`t on that down. O`DONNELL: Right. BECK: It`s unthinkable. It makes no sense. Give the ball to your workhorse, give it to Marshawn Lynch. You`re at the one-yard line. He`s got 100 yards in the game. They couldn`t stop them. I liked the other option with Russell Wilson maybe doing a little play-action, and running to the left, a little bootleg. But do not throw the football, especially to the middle of the field. If anything, throw a fade. The ball is not going to be intercepted. You still have a chance. O`DONNELL: Yes, that`s the thing, Jordan, is that you`re throwing it into a crowd on this play. SCHULTZ: Yes. O`DONNELL: And what you and Bruce are talking about is, OK, if you are going to toss it, you`re -- there`s a way to do this that will get you either an incompletion or a touchdown. This wasn`t that way. SCHULTZ: It really wasn`t. And you know, I`m glad Bruce mentioned the play-action with the run. Seattle with the read option, which they really did not use at all in the game. Russell Wilson, 849 rushing yards this season, led the NFL for quarterbacks, sixth all-time in a single season for a quarterback. That would have been a safer play. And look, I only had one-time timeout, they had three downs, under 30 seconds. They were a little worried about time. They wanted to waste a timeout or waste a play so that Tom Brady potentially wouldn`t have a lot of time to lead New England down the field. But at that point you`ve got to get in the end zone. And I thought, which was talked about in a big study by 538 today, an article saying that hey, Bill Belichick didn`t call a timeout, you really bailed him out because New England was in such dire straits. Really the only thing that could have happened for them to lose the game, Seattle was, what happened. And the chances are so slim. It was a terrible mistake that you can`t justify. BECK: And, Jordan, I like the fact that they didn`t call timeout because you`ve got the lead. And an all-wise coach named Lou Carnesecca at Saint John`s who went 526 and 200. SCHULTZ: St. John`s. BECK: Once said to me -- SCHULTZ: Let them play. BECK: -- when you have the lead, you don`t call timeout. And Belichick almost created confusion for Seattle, thinking maybe something is going on here. SCHULTZ: Yes. BECK: Might have put a shadow of doubt in their minds. I think it was a good call. O`DONNELL: Right. SCHULTZ: Yes, but -- you know what was interesting, Lawrence, sorry to cut you off, is that -- and to Bruce`s point, not calling a timeout, but also Seattle was number two in power situations this year. New England was dead last in defending it. And they said, Pete Carroll said, Darrell Bevell said, we don`t want to run against their goal line package. That was to create the confusion that Bruce was talking about, by not calling a timeout that Belichick was able to install. O`DONNELL: And Bruce, what about this? By the way, the three of us I know I`m next to zero about NFL stats, but I know this. I learned this today. BECK: OK. O`DONNELL: In this entire season of NFL play, on the one-yard line, quarterbacks threw 66 touchdowns, with zero interceptions until the final 26 seconds of the season. (CROSSTALK) BECK: I know. That just amplifies this mistake. Is it the worst in Super Bowl history? I`d say yes. Is it the worst in sports history? You can look at the Miracle at the Meadowlands in 1978 when Joe Pisarcik fumbled the ball and Herman Edwards scooped it up. You can look at Grady Little with the Boston Red Sox against the Yankees in the 2003 ALCS game seven when he left Pedro Martinez on the hill, going into the eighth with a 5-2 lead. But you can`t say anything tops this. O`DONNELL: Jordan, what about coach`s response and what he said to Matt Lauer, how is that playing in Seattle? SCHULTZ: Not well. I mean, there is a sense that Seattle -- Seattleites are appreciative of Pete Carroll kind of falling on the sword and really showing class here. And that I think is commendable. But, you know, Darrell Bevell, the offensive coordinator, is ultimately responsible. And whether or not Carroll will admit that it was Bevell`s idea, I have a hard time understanding that the offensive coordinator for the last three years, Darrell Bevell, was not involved in this and that it wasn`t his play. But to even entertain a throw here, especially on a slant route with that much traffic is just beyond words to me. O`DONNELL: But, Bruce, I`ve got to say, I love the attitude that he expresses to Matt Lauer. I love mental set where the worst thing in the world has just happened and he immediately, his brain immediately goes into, OK, what do we have to do next. BECK: I think Pete is a class act here. O`DONNELL: Yes. BECK: I mean, this could have been his legacy. Two NCAA championships. SCHULTZ: Yes. Yes. BECK: Two Super Bowl titles. Jordan, that`s amazing stuff when you think about it. Instead, he`s looking at one of the biggest, you know, mistakes in the history of the Super Bowl and in all modern sports. But I think he can handle it. This is a guy who`s seen the high note. He`s seen a lot of problems. SCHULTZ: Yes. BECK: He was a guy who was fired in New England. As a matter fact, New England is saying we finally won a Super Bowl with Pete Carroll. (LAUGHTER) SCHULTZ: Yes. BECK: Because he helped get them the Super Bowl. SCHULTZ: Well, you know -- O`DONNELL: Go ahead, Jordan. Last words. You deserve it. You`ve earned. SCHULTZ: Yes. Really quickly. Well, with Pete Carroll, this happened, a similar situation at USC. They lost to Texas in the `05 title game. Reggie Bush was the Heisman Trophy running back, was a fourth in two, he gave it to another running back who let -- who went on to be an NFL player, but not the Heisman winner. They lost the game and he was blamed a lot. He will get over this, to Bruce`s point. But to me, the bigger story is legacy. The legacy that they could have had back-to-back titles for the first in a decade. It`s almost impossible and who knows when you have another opportunity? BECK: Absolutely. O`DONNELL: Jordan Schultz, who has absolutely no plans to get over this, thank you very much for joining us tonight. SCHULTZ: Thank you. O`DONNELL: Bruce Beck, thank you very much. BECK: Good to be with you. O`DONNELL: Thanks for coming across the hall. Thank you. You can see more of Matt Lauer`s interview with Pete Carroll tomorrow morning on the "Today" show. In the "Rewrite" tonight, how kissing can get you in big trouble in Russia. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) O`DONNELL: And now for the good news. Four firefighters in Greenfield, Wisconsin, went above and beyond the call of duty on Sunday when they were called to help a 50-year-old man who suffered a cardiac incident after working too hard removing snow in his driveway. After rushing him to the hospital, the firefighters then returned to the man`s home and shoveled the rest of his driveway. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) TOM KONIECZKA, FIREFIGHTER: At the time it seemed like an obvious thing to do. I talked with my partner a little bit about it, and, you know, it was just a nice thing to do, I think, to make their life a little bit easier when they were having a little bit of a crisis. JON COHN, FIRE CHIEF, GREENFIELD, WISCONSIN: Informally, we created a mission statement that was do the right thing. And this is the epitome of what we`ve done, and our members have embraced it and they continue to do the right things and this happened to get noticed. There`s an appetite for good news and we provided that. KONIECZKA: A lot of us firefighters love our job and want to keep doing what we`re doing. (END VIDEO CLIP) O`DONNELL: You can see more of that good news interview on our Web site LastWord.MSNBC.com. Coming up in the "Rewrite" the bravest kissers of the year. So far. Followed by the brave playwright and activist Eve Ensler. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) O`DONNELL: In the "Rewrite" tonight, the bravest kissers of the year. We`re only 35 days into 2015, and the frontrunners for bravest kissers of the year are a couple who kissed on an airplane. Just kissed. No Mile High Club stuff. Just a little flash of PDA. Now how brave is it to kiss your girl on an airplane? Not very. Unless the airplane is in Russia, and you`re a lesbian kissing your girlfriend. And you`re doing it just to humiliate a viciously homophobic St. Petersburg councilman, who you have deliberately captured in the background of your selfie. A club owner whose screen name is Kseniya Infinity posted this photo that she took on a light from Moscow to St. Petersburg knowing it would drive St. Petersburg councilman Vitaly Milonov crazy. Vitaly Milonov who actually was already crazy, was the architect of Russia`s anti-gay propaganda law signed by Vladimir Putin in 2013. Councilman Milonov recently reacted to Apple CEO Tim Cook`s announcement that he is gay by insisting that Tim Cook should be banned from Russia for life. Milonov said, "What could he bring us, the Ebola virus, AIDS, gonorrhea? Ban him for life." When Milonov later discovered that he`d been photo bombed on that airplane by a lesbian couple on the flight that the photo -- and that the photo had gone viral, he told Agence France-Presse, "The lesbians went through with this photo session due to their stupidity. It shows that all LGBT people are mentally ill. They have overdosed on so-called European values." And Milonov vowed to retaliate saying, "They should have to do a photo session in a police station." This brave couple knew just how crazy Milonov is when they took this photo and posted it. They knew that Milonov would love to get them thrown in jail for something, anything. But they did it anyway. And they`re thrilled that they did it. Along with her posting of the photograph, Kseniya said, "The whole flight from Moscow to St. Petersburg, Milonov said nothing to us. We staged the photo shoot in front of him and he hid behind his tablet when he realized we`re -- when he realized it. We`re all super happy. Him, probably not so much." Many people on Russia`s most popular social media sites simply could not believe that the photo was real, so Kseniya uploaded more photos and said, "Lots of people are asking me about my last post. Did we really go and kiss in front of Milonov? Was it really Milonov? Maybe it was just somebody who looked like him. What was the flight like? And so on. Here are my answered. Yes. It was really Milonov. As fate would have it he was sitting in the row right behind us." If you would like to enter the LAST WORD`s bravest kissers of the year contest, please go to Russia and find Milonov and outrage him, at least as much as this photo does. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) O`DONNELL: We have breaking news at this hour about a computer hack that could affect you. The FBI tells NBC News that the bureau is investigating a computer hacking attack against one of America`s largest health insurance companies, Anthem. Anthem says it does not appear that personal banking or health information was stolen -- does not appear yet. But the hackers did get access to personal information, including names, birthdays, Social Security numbers, street addresses, e-mail addresses and employment information, including income data. Anthem says it will notify victims of the attack. We`ll be right back. (COMMERCIAL BREAK) O`DONNELL: "When you rape, beat, maim, mutilate, burn, bury, and terrorize women, you destroy the essential life energy on the planet." Eve Ensler wrote those words in her play "The Vagina Monologues" 19 years ago. She then used the worldwide success of the "Vagina Monologues" which has been translated into 48 languages in over 140 countries to fight violence against women around the world. She created V-Day, a global activist movement to end violence against women and girls, which always finds a way to seize our attention on February 14th. This year on February 14th, V-Day will continue its fight with the third One Billion Rising global event. (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP) ISATOU TOURAY, ONE BILLION RISING: Everywhere you touch, you either check the Internet, you read the papers, call other countries, you hear everybody talking about One Billion Rising against violence against woman, One Billion Rising for justice, and so many other issues that lead to violence against women. That is such a magical. The energy was so extraordinary. DIYA MALIKA, ONE BILLION RISING: I`m rising because I`m one of those individuals, one of the billion women that has been sexually assaulted. KHAMLA BHASIN, ONE BILLION RISING GLOBAL COORDINATOR: Justice has been part of our struggles all the time because we have always struggled against injustice. This time when the entire world together for One Billion Rising, ask for justice. It obviously became bigger. (END VIDEO CLIP) O`DONNELL: Joining me now, Eve Ensler, founder of One Billion Rising and a Tony Award winning playwright. Eve, where does it feel like you are in this movement? Meaning, beginning, middle, you know, somewhere toward not an end, but real progress? EVE ENSLER, ONE BILLION RISING: It`s such a good question. I ask myself really that all the time. I mean, sometimes it feels like we really move forward, sometimes it feels like we`re just beginning. I don`t see the end yet. O`DONNELL: Right. ENSLER: But I think one of the things I have really experienced of the last three years of this campaign, One Billion Rising, and now One Billion Revolution, is we have definitely seen an escalation in the energy, the attention, the response, and the kind of coalition building that`s happening around the world. And that`s very exciting. I think it`s hard to tell because I think as we progress more women come forward to tell their stories so it may seem as if more women are being violated. So it`s hard to tell, is it that we`re having progress or is it that we`re moving backwards? At the same time, having just toured the world in the last few months, I am seeing so much grassroots uprisings around the world. I was in the Philippines, I was in Taiwan, I was in India, I was in Brussels, I was in France. And I think what`s happening right now is we`re at a tipping point. I think if we really move forward, if we really say this is the moment where violence against women cannot be denied ever again, and we have the kind of uprising that we had last year, and we -- it`s very clear from everything that`s coming in right now, that this movement has taken fire around the world. It is going to be the biggest rising we`ve ever had, in villages, in towns, in cities. I mean, cultures were riding in today who are up in Oregon, and they have put posters for -- cultures are rising to end violence against women. We`re seeing vets, women vets who are being raped in the military, doing vets across America. We`re seeing the restaurant workers who have been working with One Billion Rising who are rising because of the minimum wage. $2.13 an hour restaurant workers are still making. So they rely on tips, which makes sexual harassment the largest and the highest in the restaurant business. And they are rising to end low wages and end tipping as a dependable wage. So we`re seeing also this great coalition and this great intersection of looking at economic rights, looking at gender rights, looking at racial justice, looking at environmental justice, and a kind of coming together into one story of uprising. O`DONNELL: I last saw you after a great -- another great evening of theater, OPC, which you had at American Repertory Theater, and you did a great conversation with the audience, and I sat there and I wondered, you know, Eve does all this activist work every year, year in and year out, whether she has a new play coming out or not. And then -- and somehow you find the time somewhere in the day to continue to write brilliantly. That`s -- I mean, OPC is another enormous theatrical burst from you. And I just don`t -- tell me how you manage this time, how do you get these things done. ENSLER: You know, I was so privileged. I get to be in this ginormous movement and campaign with extraordinary activists around the world. Many of whom have just flown into New York for our big uprising on February 7th at the Hammerstein Ballroom. I mean, my sisters are here from the Philippines, from Kenya, from Congo, from Afghanistan. And I look at the amazing, brave, daring, extraordinary work they`re doing on the front lines, in situations that seem absolutely untenable, and let - - they`re transforming consciousness. So it seems to me that gives me an abundance of energy and an abundance of, to be honest, hope because I see the kind of grassroots uprisings that are happening across the planet. O`DONNELL: You also talked that night, though, about how vulnerable you can be to the news, how too much of what we do here can just kind of break you down emotionally and so you have to fight against that in order to continue this larger fight. ENSLER: Well, you know, I was talking to someone about this today. I think one of the problems with America, sometimes, and I really feel this when I come back here, is this kind of individualism. You know, us, me, me, me. And I think the anecdote to that is really thinking about the bigger story, the bigger we. And what we are privileged with, and many of us in this country, is time and the ability to think and when I feel overwhelmed by the stories I`m hearing, I try to turn that into action. I try to do that into doing something in terms of lifting -- the world. And changing at least 1 percent a day and making it a little better. And I think that`s why I really strongly suggest that people -- END