IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

The Beat with Ari Melber, Transcript 9/15/17 Trump supporters burning "MAGA" hats

Guests: Ryan Girdusky, Howard Dean, Joan Walsh, Jamal Simmons, Jason Maloni, Ken Vogel, Nick Akerman, Barbara Res, Shawn Henry, Franklin Foer, Seth Herzog

Show: THE BEAT WITH ARI MELBER Date: September 15, 2017 Guest: Ryan Girdusky, Howard Dean, Joan Walsh, Jamal Simmons, Jason Maloni, Ken Vogel, Nick Akerman, Barbara Res, Shawn Henry, Franklin Foer, Seth Herzog

ARI MELBER, MSNBC HOST: Well, I`ll tell you. I`ve done a lot of lawn mowing. That was something my dad always made us do at home and it seems like this guy has got the work ethic.

TODD: Yes, he does. I love it.

MELBER: Chuck, have a great weekend. Thank you as always.

Now, everyone is always asked what if anything would turn off Trump`s base. The answer today, working with Nancy Pelosi on immigration. Trump heading into the weekend with his supporters, you`ve got to see this, literally burning with rage.

Today, they are lighting Make America Great Again gear on fire over this rumor of a possible Dreamer deal. These are real photographs from real Trump supporters - the hats, the sweatshirts up in smoke. Trump`s base literally inflamed.

And for those who couldn`t burn their MAGA gear inside their buildings, they went into the trash. Some ex-supporters made videos that are spreading online about torching their hats.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: DACA, to stay in Afghanistan, and to violate several campaign promises leaves me no choice. You have become the swamp. Either drain the swamp for you will never make America great again.

Your move.


MELBER: Your move. The reference there to Trump`s campaign promises, deporting Dreamers and building that wall, both right now, this week, in question.

Now, the base which he once bragged would, of course, stick with him infamously even if he shot someone, some of the base is boiling. And Trump was back out today perhaps responding, perhaps not. We`ll show you the tweets. He brought up the travel ban and chain migration in all caps.

This does look like some sort of new territory. Many people in Trump`s base have stuck through him through many controversies, from the campaign fights over the Access Hollywood tape to Charlottesville, to disclosures in the Russia inquiry of his own son agreeing to meet with people offering help from Russia in the campaign.

There is also a split here from Republican establishment leaders.

Now, I am going to speak about all of this with our special political panel tonight. You see them there, some familiar faces.

But, first, we turn to what might be a new face. Ryan Girdusky is a conservative who endorsed Trump the day he announced, voted for him in the primary and the general and is a writer at the conservative blog Red Alert Politics.

But he is part of this effort saying he`s outraged by Trump sharing this image of his own burning Make America Great Again hat on Twitter. Ryan, what moved you to go from being a Trump voter to burning your hat?

RYAN GIRDUSKY, SENIOR WRITER, RED ALERT POLITICS: Just the betrayal over DACA. I mean, we did not vote for Trump. Trump`s base did not - whatever you`ve heard on, this network or other networks. We didn`t vote for him because he`s a reality star or because of his hair, because he is funny.

We voted for him on serious policy issues - immigration, trade, foreign policy. And we took blow by blow. This is the final straw.

DACA is a serious issue. If DACA passes, if DACA - if the DREAM Act passes, it will result in millions of new immigrants and Trump was the anti-amnesty candidate. And it`s an absolute betrayal. And Trump supporting should absolutely keep burning their hats.

MELBER: You say betrayal. Do you think he`s lying?

GIRDUSKY: Lying to who?

MELBER: Lying to people. If he campaigned on this, the wall, deporting Dreamers and then he seems to have a different view in office, do you feel lied to?

GIRDUSKY: I don`t know if I feel lied to because there have been certain policies that he`s gone forward. The travel ban, for example. He kept to his promise. He stuck to his guns. Despite even a court case, he stuck to his guns. And I can condone him for that. That`s amazing.

And he`s done other things as well. But at the same exact time, this is a huge, huge, huge issue. And I think that a big problem is that Trump has surrounded himself with people - people in the White House who don`t share his vision.

Gen. Kelly, for example, at DHS, did not share Trump`s vision whatsoever. Nikki Haley doesn`t share his vision on foreign policy. Marc Short doesn`t share his vision. Personnel is policy.

And I don`t believe it`s in the president`s best interest, it`s in his base`s best interest to surround himself with these wishy-washy, sometimes Democrats, generals and billionaires.

MELBER: And these are powerful images, controversial images that you and others are putting out. Do you think President Trump is seeing what you started here?

GIRDUSKY: Well, I have heard that he has, not just myself, but other people. I heard that he has seen these images and that he did respond because, today, he responded, we need to end chain migration.

OK. You can`t get that with the DREAM Act, you can`t get that with amnesty for DACA. And he also sent a fundraising email that`s saying read my lips basically, we are not going to pass, we`re going to build the wall.

Well, OK, Mr. President, if that`s true, do it. Do it first.

MELBER: Final question, Ryan. And I appreciate getting your perspective here tonight. Final question. Do you think Donald Trump is taking people like you, your votes, for granted?

GIRDUSKY: We`ll see. We`ll see. If the DREAM Act happens, yes. If DACA doesn`t happen and he reverses course and he changes his ways, no, then he`s hearing us loud and clear.

The base is powerful. Conservatives are powerful. We have to make it known we`re not going to sit there and take those.

MELBER: Ryan Girdusky, a day one endorser of Donald Trump and a conservative writer online, thanks for giving us your perspective tonight.

GIRDUSKY: Thank you.

MELBER: I want to turn to our panel. National Affairs Correspondent for The Nation, Joan Walsh; former Vermont Governor, DNC Chair; Howard Dean; and Jamal Simmons, a veteran of many Democratic campaigns.

Governor, what we seeing here and what you think of what Ryan said?

HOWARD DEAN, FORMER GOVERNOR, VERMONT: Well, I think like most Trump supporters, he has his facts wrong to begin with.

Of course, it`s not going to increase the number immigrants in this country if you pass the DREAM act because they are already here and they`ve been here for many, many years. And that`s why so many Republicans actually believe that the DREAM Act is a good thing and that we may get a deal.

It won`t just be a deal between Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer and Donald Trump. It will be a bipartisan bill. And those are pretty rare and I think it would be good for the country.

But, often, these folks who consider themselves very conservative Trumpers just don`t know what the facts are and they wish the facts were different and they keep pretending they are.


JOAN WALSH, NATIONAL AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT, "THE NATION": Well, first of all, I think Ryan is fine, burning his Make America Great hat because Donald Trump is wearing that USA hat. It costs $40 online at his website and he would like everyone to buy that. So, he`s totally cool with the burning of the hat.

I feel for Ryan. I do feel like they`ve been betrayed. I also feel that Ryan may be fine because I don`t necessarily believe that any deal will happen. I think that Donald Trump has said things and flip-flopped and flopped back.

It`s a long road before we have a DREAM Act. And I also want to reassure Ryan, but I probably can`t, but the Dreamers are not bringing in more people. They really are - I`m on the left, Ari, as you know. And on the left, there are a lot of people who are saying, we`re pointing to the Dreamers too much, we`re using them like the American Dream, the cream of the crop, the really good immigrants and we should care about all immigrants. I agree with that.

But the Dreamers really are people who I think most - I know most Americans, by opinion polls, believe should be here. They have been here for their lives. We`ve educated them and they are doing great things. So, the idea that they are somehow low lives and they don`t belong here, no one thinks that.

MELBER: Jamal, on the politics of this, we see some people burning their hats. It`s not everyone yet, but you can`t start a fire without a spark, as the old chorus goes. And you have something here that, obviously, could continue to grow when we`ve seen Donald Trump get way with other things.

JAMAL SIMMONS, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: Ari, it`s amazing that this is a thing that would be the straw that breaks the camel`s back for some of these voters.

I mean, it`s not Russia, it`s not anything going on with the business dealings, it has to do with immigration. And from day one, as you called the last guest, you called him as one of his day one supporters.

From day one, Donald Trump came out against Mexican American immigrants, calling them rapists and other things.

I think, for too many Donald Trump supporters - I don`t know your earlier guest, I don`t want to categorize him individually, but for too many Donald Trump supporters, Make America Great Again was a euphemism for make America white again.

And I think they are incredibly concerned that he`s going to keep immigration coming into the country. At one point, they said they were against illegal immigration. Yet, a month ago, Donald Trump said he wanted to cut legal immigration in half.

This is about Latin American, Latino citizens or Latino human beings coming across the southern border. It`s not about Eastern European waitresses in New York City. Nobody is rounding them up. It`s not about Canadians who are overstaying their visas in places like (INAUDIBLE) in Michigan. This is about Mexican-Americans and people from south of the border, and we`ve got to be honest about that.

MELBER: Well, I appreciate you raising that because the travel ban is often referred to as a shorthand to a few of the countries that were picked, but it also has a ban on refugees who are overwhelmingly humanitarian aid crises.

Young refugees, according to the experts, don`t pose any kind of militant threat, depending on how they`re screened and there`s a very lengthy screening process.

And yet, I`m going to play you Rep. King here saying this is the turning point, this is the reversal item. And as you say, it seems to be a real obsession with immigration from certain places. Congressman King, take a listen.


CONGERSSMEN STEVE KING: I think something is going to have to reverse here with this president`s policy or it will just blow up his base. I mean, this was a straight-up promise all the way through his campaign.

What it means is that the base will leave him. They won`t be able to defend him anymore.


MELBER: And, Jamal, that`s part of what we`re seeing.

SIMMONS: That`s right. Listen, here is a place where the politics gets tricky for Donald Trump. If there is something that comes back from the Russian investigation, if there is something that comes back from his shady business dealings, will there be a conservative infrastructure that puts pressure on the people in Congress to keep him in place.

If that conservative infrastructure begins to crumble, you may actually see people in Congress begin to hold this president accountable, and that`s something, I think, would drive him crazy.

MELBER: Gov. Dean?

DEAN: Well, the Republican establishment is going to throw Trump over the side if his numbers get worse or if he finds something with Russia, no matter what.

I actually think Trump`s base is only terrifying to Republicans who`ve basically sod themselves to the devil over the last 20 years on racial issues and immigration issues.

So, it`s not clear to me that this is about nothing more - I think this is just nothing more than just politics as usual. I think the Trump base is fairly irrelevant to Democrats and to moderate Republicans because they don`t - there`s only - there`s, what, 30 percent of them. That just doesn`t include that much of a fear factor, except in Republican primaries.

MELBER: Right. I mean, the burning hats are interesting because, as you know, governor, they`re burning hats. I mean, their hats on fire. So, there is something interesting about it.

And yet, to your point, the political map does not require getting into that garbage can, Joan, and pulling out the hat and winning that person over because Romney had 47 percent, Trump had 46 percent. Hillary Clinton is on her book tour talking about the how and the why.

Democrats can win without any of those 46 percent. And yet, having said that, and I acknowledge that politically, it is interesting to look at these numbers of Trump voters, most of whom do not support deportation for Dreamers.

This is a new poll - 26 percent, yes, deport Dreamers. The other larger plurality saying something else short of deportation and that`s Trump voters.

WALSH: It`s fascinating to me, Ari, because I think there is a mismatch between what we see in the media and even that middle core of Trump voters. They may even think they`re racist. But when it comes to the Dreamers, they kind of get that they have been here all their lives. It will be very cruel to throw them out.

But I think we have to worry about them. I think Trump has to worry about them. I think that he is definitely cozying up to Chuck and Nancy. He likes to talk about them in order to poke McConnell and Ryan in the eye.

But he needs McConnell and Ryan. This is a very dangerous thing for him to do. He`s doing it because he likes being liked and they are acting like they like him. It`s like sixth-grade stuff right now. But I can see him totally turning his back on Chuck and Nancy and the Dreamers. I don`t think this is a done deal at all.

MELBER: Well, they did a linguistic analysis on the campaign trail. The Trump speech was read at fourth grade level. So, if you`re saying this is sixth grade, that is -

WALSH: He`s graduated. That`s two years ago.

MELBER: That is an improvement. I want to thank Joan Walsh, Gov. Dean and Jamal Simmons. I`m going to see some of you later in the show.

Coming up, the Trump White House refusing to come clean about who is visiting Mar-a-Lago. There was a lawsuit deadline of today. And THE BEAT has our own reporting on who`s been there. It should be interesting.

Also, what is happening with the wall and why Trump seems to be misleading about where those renovations are coming.

And then later, I am going to speak live on THE BEAT to the woman in this photo, a long-time Trump executive, about how he hypes buildings, but doesn`t always deliver.

And Facebook under fire for the way it took rubles from the Russians during the campaign.

I`m Ari Melber and you`re watching THE BEAT.


MELBER: One of the most significant developments in Bob Mueller`s Russia probe is actually, when you think about it, the hardest to see. It`s the questioning that investigators do in that secret grand jury room.

So, all we can see today is this, witnesses departing the grand jury. That`s a Paul Manafort aide confirming - in this discussion right here you`re going to hear, he`s confirming that he complied with Mueller`s order to testify.


JASON MALONI: My name is Jason Maloni. I`m president of JadeRoq. I was ordered to appear before the grand jury. I answered questions and I have been dismissed.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: What types of questions did they ask?

MALONI: That`s all I have to say.


MELBER: That`s all he had to say and that`s fair. There is nothing negative to be assumed from a witness testifying, although it`s certainly a burden on many of the people involved in the investigation.

Other news, though, today is the Trump administration catching heat in another legal case. The judge ordering Trump to release the names of presidential visitors at Mar-a-Lago during his presidency by today.

Now, they put out a list of only 22 people from one weekend`s activities in the Japan state visit. And that`s, obviously, weird because Trump is apparently not complying with the judge`s order by only releasing one weekend`s list of names.

We know, from public accounts, way more than 22 people have been to Mar-a- Lago during that period this year. There is a Democratic group that says reports shows the numbers over a thousand.

Now, today at THE BEAT, we looked at public reports of visitors. And here are just some of the people who did apparently visit and were left off this Trump list of visitors that they are ordered by a court to provide.

It ranges from reality show cameos like Real Housewife cast members, Countess Luann and Jill Zarin to donors like the billionaire Koch Brothers. Their visit was reported by "The New York Times`" Ken Vogel to prominent commenters on the Russia case, like Alan Dershowitz, who has criticized the inquiry and also declined to answer questions on this program about whether he`s ever been compensated to represent Trump.

So, while some of those names may not matter, others certainly do, which is why the ethics group that is suing for the names, and they are also suing over Trump allegedly taking foreign government money, says that today`s filing was spitting in the eye of transparency.

They say they`ll be fighting this in court.

With me now is former Watergate prosecutor Nick Akerman and Ken Vogel of "The New York Times" who did some of the reporting we just relied on.

Ken, start wherever you want. There is a lot here.

KEN VOGEL, "THE NEW YORK TIMES" POLITICAL REPORTER: Yes, Ari. Obviously, if there is - if we believe that there is either a public policy or a legal reason, why these names should be released, the names in the visitor log to Mar-a-Lago, as the court evidently did in ordering this release, then this disclosure today does not meet that legal rationale.

It`s a very partial list. It includes, as you mentioned, just 22 names, including like the names of the Prime Minister of Japan, a butler and a garbage van driver.

MELBER: Very partial? I mean, this is months and months and months and they say here is one weekend`s names. It`s like they want to - as a lawyer, I look at, it`s like they are deliberately trying to look defiant. What the strategy is, I don`t know that we know.

VOGEL: Yes. And their crew has indicated that they will push for more names. It`s unclear what the court will do.

On the other story that you mentioned, Jason Maloni, the Manafort spokesman testifying, I think that`s interesting because we still haven`t seen the grand jury really go for the folks, subpoena the folks at the core of this, particularly when it comes to Paul Manafort who Jason Maloni is a spokesman for.

They are still very much around the edges, building the case, some of the key folks who work with Paul Manafort and some of the jobs that are in issue, including for the pro - the Russia-aligned president of Ukraine, former president Viktor Yanukovych. Those folks have not heard at all from the special counsel.

So, we`re still kind of in the outer layers of the onion, as journalists or prosecutors talk about building the case. They start with the outer layers. We`re still there, suggests that there is a long way to go, both in terms of the investigation and in terms of the time that it`s going to drag out before we really get to the heart of the matter.

MELBER: The outer layers of the onion, Nik, and as you know, when you cut in deep to the onion, you start crying over the legal fees.

NICK AKERMAN, FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR: The legal fees are enormous, absolutely.

MELBER: So, I want to show you a little bit of context from a different grand jury, the Clinton grand jury, and reporting back then about how onerous this can be.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Fighting legal battles on two fronts and facing attorney fees that could run $2 million dollars a year. President Clinton has now asked the public to help foot the bill.

Corporations and political action committees cannot contribute, but individual lobbyists could still write the Clintons a check.

They are confident here the president will raise the money he needs, but it`s still an embarrassment and there could ultimately be a political price to be paid.


MELBER: And these legal bills are stacking up for a lot of people who work for Trump.

AKERMAN: Right. I`m sure they are. But, again, I think it`s very important to know who`s funding people, who`s paying these legal based bills, just the same way it`s important to know who`s going to Mar-a-Lago, who are the people that are influencing the president of the United States, who are the people that are funding his legal defense. I mean, I think that is critical for the public to know.

MELBER: And that goes to who else Mueller needs to talk to. I want to play for you a former candidate in Secretary Hillary Clinton speaking to our own Rachel Maddow here last night, zeroing in on the Facebook piece, which we`re just hearing more and more about. Take a listen.


HILLARY CLINTON, FORMER DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: We now know that they were sowing discord during the election with phony groups on Facebook. They were running anti-immigrant, anti-me, anti-Hillary Clinton demonstrations, and so we`re going to make Facebook own up to everything.

They`ve just begun to own up. They have a long way to go before they get to where they need to be in my opinion.


MELBER: Do you think she`s overstating the case and how does Mueller get into all of that data, the metadata? Will that be key to the case he`s making or potentially making?

AKERMAN: It`s absolutely critical. I mean, I think she may be overstating the case in terms of what can be done with Facebook.

But what information Facebook has? They know who the Russians were targeting with respect to these phony stories. They know the demographics, they know the geography. And what they need to do is take all of that data and compare it to what the Trump campaign was doing with their data mining program.

If you recall, the person who was in charge of the data mining, which meant trying to go in and target the Trump voters and the Clinton voters, to suppress the Clinton vote and to bring out the Trump vote.

So, if you can sort of take those two datasets and compare them, I think you might find some very interesting conclusions.

That is, do they match up? Do the Russians - what they were doing, does that match up to what the Trump campaign was doing?

MELBER: Right. Does any of the data have the clues? You follow the data. And, Ken, of course, you follow the money. I know, in your reporting, you always say, it`s just dollar-dollar-bills-you-all. I think that`s how you`ve always put it.

And Sen. Warner was calling on Facebook as well, Democratic intel member, and he`s talking about how they bought these election ads, tweeting "they paid in RUBLES." Seriously, Ken, how much is it following dollars versus rubles here?

VOGEL: Well, certainly there - I think we`re seeing just the beginning of the way that social media can be sort of manipulated in ways that are either illegal, if it come - it would be illegal if there were US persons who are knowingly coordinating with foreigners to place ads that were an attempt to influence the election.

I don`t know that we can definitely prove that. It took Facebook this long just to own up to the fact that it actually - to be charitable here, to determine that this actually occurred and that Russians were the ones placing these ads and that they may have been (INAUDIBLE).

MELBER: I appreciate that. You`re a charitable guy. Nick, I don`t feel that charitable right now. Facebook is an incredibly powerful, politically-connected group and they declined to commit to releasing even information about the Russian government backed Facebook posts, groups and paid ads to the users who encountered them.

So, that means, if you`re a Facebook user and you sign away all your rights and the terms of use and they treat you like content in a product - Equifax is over here, right?


MELBER: Americans are realizing this company has all this info about you. And unless pressured, they don`t care about keeping it safe and it can ruin your credit history and your life.

And Facebook is doing this in a civic and political way. How do you put legally the pressure on these companies?

AKERMAN: I think the way to do it is that Mueller has to subpoena these companies?

MELBER: Should Mueller subpoena Zuckerberg?

AKERMAN: He should subpoena Facebook for sure. I mean, that data, as I mentioned before, could be critical in proving collusion between the Russian government and the Trump campaign.

MELBER: And I don`t think we`ve seen leaks to that effect yet.

AKERMAN: I don`t think you`re going to see any leaks to that effect. I think that evidence - what you have here with Facebook is really unusual because you can tell from these ad buys exactly the demographics that they were targeting, you can tell the geography they were targeting, and then you take that and compare it because that could turn out to be a critical evidence in proving collusion.

VOGEL: You know what, guys, if I might, just real quickly, I don`t think - I`m not convinced on the collusion on the social media standpoint. I watched the Trump campaign up close. I talked to people who worked on that data operation.

They could barely collude with themselves. They literally had a website initially that was accepting donations. And the information from donors was not automatically populating into their donor file and their voter file. They had to do that manually.

So, I don`t think the Trump campaign was super sophisticated on this front.

MELBER: You`re saying, during the campaign, you didn`t see the technical proficiency to collude even if they wanted to?

VOGEL: Exactly. Certainly, early on. That said, I do agree that we`re just seeing the tip of the iceberg as to how a foreign actor or someone who is just trying to make mischief in the election could do that using social media, whether or not there was a willing participant who was actively working with them, who was involved in the election.

So, I think that this is something that does get to the heart of Mueller`s investigation, not from the collusion standpoint, but from the Russian meddling standpoint both in 2016 and to really root out the ways in which foreign actors could try to create mischief going forward in future elections.

MELBER: Ken Vogel and Nick Akerman, out of time. Thank you both. Up next, we have our investigation into Donald Trump`s border wall and whether the reality is anything close to his rhetoric.

I`m going to speak to a former Trump executive right here about all of that.

And later, could be Russia`s next hack. Our experts talk about a hack so dangerous it`s called The Big One.




ARI MELBER, MSNBC HOST: Sometimes Donald Trump has to give up on his own story, even running from a classic campaign pledge.


DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: We will build a great wall and Mexico will pay for the wall.


MELBER: The cliche is campaign and poetry, govern and pros. For Trump, apparently, it was campaign on Mexico buying the wall and govern on America buying the wall. But by the way, maybe it`s not a wall it is and more of an ongoing renovation.


TRUMP: The wall will come later. We`re right now renovating large sections of wall, massive sections making it brand new. We`re doing a lot of renovation. We`re building four different samples of the wall to see which one we`re going to choose. And the wall is going to be built. It will be funded a little bit later.


MELBER: And as we reported on THE BEAT, those renovations are from Obama and Bush-era projects, not the Trump administration. Today`s New York Times suggested on the front page, Trump`s following an immigration agenda increasingly set by Democrats. Was this always Trump`s plan though, just promise a wall that would never get built? We answer that question tonight by turning to a special segment first on THE BEAT. I`m joined by an Executive who works with Trump for 18 years, even overseeing construction at Trump Tower, watching Trump pitch other long shot construction projects, some of which never became reality. I`m joined now by Barbara Res, former Executive Vice President at the Trump Organization. Thank you for being here.


MELBER: When you see him promise this much on the wall and then keep moving the goalposts, is it consistent with what he was like in business or different?

RES: Well, it`s consistent to an extent. He -- lots of times he did he what was expedient or what was necessary to win over what you know, he was trying to accomplish. So he would move along as time went on. The clear - - the clear example of my mind is on the West Side Yards when he was going to do a project there. We were going to do a different project and he ended up making a deal with the local people who objected to the project and they came up with a plan for like a wall of buildings along the river. But the problem was, there was that highway there. So, you know, you didn`t see the buildings from the river, you saw the highway built just behind it. So they decide that had they would put the buildings, they would bring the West Side Highway in under the buildings and make this beautiful landscape therein --

MELBER: Big promise.

RES: Yes.

MELBER: It didn`t happen.

RES: No one ever thought it would happen.

MELBER: Did he think it would happen?

RES: No, no.

MELBER: He knew.

RES: Of course.

MELBER: Let me read from I believe that same story here. Even Mr. Trump who once called himself the number one fan of getting the highway down -- what you`re talking about, this big idea -- now says he`d actually be better off economically and logistically if it remained in place.

RES: Well, yes. So, I mean, you know, it was what the people wanted to -- what the people wanted to hear. And yes, he wasn`t alone on that. I think the people of the planning commission also knew this was never going to happen.

MELBER: So is this like a bubble that never pops or in your experience with Donald Trump, does it eventually pops?

RES: It depends. You know, sometimes he really starts out wanting to do something and thinks he`s going to accomplish it and then you know, has to back away from it. But sometimes he does accomplish what he says he is going to do. What the wall in Mexico, he never thought was going to build that.

MELBER: You`re view of having -- you worked with Trump for 18 years.

RES: Yes.

MELBER: Whether the wall was serious in his mind or not, you think --

RES: Oh, I don`t see how he could possibly have been. I mean, it`s ridiculously expensive. It`s unnecessary. It`s -- it was the window dressing. It was something that he could feed to his -- to his audience and you know, build the wall, who is going to pay for it?

MELBER: Right. Let me ask you this. There`s a lot of things that go on in government that don`t get enough attention. Speaking with you briefly - - and we were talking about the appointment of new federal prosecutors because he fired them all. Put a pie chart up and show everyone based on gender. This is breakdown of Donald Trump`s appointments to be prosecutors. You`re a woman who was a high-level executive, what do you think of that?

RES: I don`t think that`s Donald. To be honest with you, I don`t --

MELBER: But that is Donald because those are his appointments.

RES: Yes, they`re his appointments but I don`t think he dictated, I don`t want any women attorneys working for the government. He used to hire, I mean, I don`t know about now, but he used the hire very strong women.

MELBER: So he`s just letting other people call the shots on those appointments?

RES: I think that he`s just paneling. You know, whoever he -- whoever he want. You know, just give me what I want and you can go ahead and do anything. He does have a very sexist group with -- you know --

MELBER: Around him.

RES: -- some of the things that they`ve done. Yes.

MELBER: Final question Barbara, because you have such an interesting front row seat to what is now history in the making. Did you ever think during those 18 years that he would become President?

RES: No, absolutely not. He talked about it once in a while and it was kind of like joke among the group. But then, I never thought that any personal without any political ability would be running for President, maybe governor or something.

MELBER: Right. Did it turn out to be a joke, or is this -- is this snapping? This is -- we`re not a movie, right?

RES: No, I`m afraid this is real. We have to make the best of it.

MELBER: That`s -- I -- you know, that`s a great point to end on. I should end on my interviews by asking, is this real? Barbara, thank you so much for coming in. I really appreciate it. And don`t forget to check us out on Facebook and Twitter, @THEBEATWITHARI. You can tell us your view of whether there`s any hats you want to burn from anyone`s political operations. Now, ahead, I have my own special breakdown of how Trump painted himself a new corner of his base. The burning hats are actually a symptom of a deeper problem in the administration, I`ll explain it. And also, since it is Friday, it is time to "FALLBACK." That`s also coming up.


MELBER: Now we turn to the largest breach yet of America`s a Power Grid and a Russia link group may be behind it. Wired reporting hackers gaining direct access to the U.S. Power Grid controls. That means they could actually shut down an American Power Systems with real-world consequences. Experts say there is a similarity to past hacks tied to Russia. Now, a new book outlines a scarier scenario, The Big One, the inevitable mega-hack that rumbles society with its core, disrupt financial system so that fortunes disappear in an unrecoverable flash or trigger an actual explosion of infrastructure that kills. Critical infrastructure can be seriously compromised. Hackers can wreak havoc with the push of a button. All they need is to penetrate any insecure system and they have managed to do this before. A recent attack on U.S. nuclear power stations which was public in July was then pinned to Russian hackers. Their motivation?


JUAN ZARATE, NBC NEWS SENIOR NATIONAL SECURITY ANALYST: To send a message. To say back off because we have the ability to strike you in the heart of your core system. Your networks that matter to your economy and to your lifestyle.


MELBER: Joining me now is Shawn Henry, a former FBI Official and Chief Security Officer at CrowdStrike and Franklin Foer who work with Facebook founder Chris Hughes at the New Republic and wrote that new book World Without Mind. Sean, how worried should we be about this new reports that hackers can get into the Grid?

SHAWN HENRY, CROWDSTRIKE CHIEF SECURITY OFFICER, AND FORMER FBI OFFICIAL: Well, I think we should be very, very concerned. It`s not that they can, they have. They`re already -- they`re already there and they have been there. We`ve recently seen just in the last six months, kind of a resurgence in the energy sector. We`ve seen that previously with some of the groups that we`ve been tracking going back three or four years. But these recent excursions into the networks, actors who have access and have actually been able to take screenshots of control panels demonstrates that not only do they have the access but with that access, they have the capability to start manipulating systems, potentially turning off some of the sectors.

MELBER: And Franklin, this feeds right into the longer term stuff you`re looking at which I think is designed to just completely scare everyone. I don`t know whether you know, a massive blackout is more dangerous than people waking up and finding out their savings is completely gone and what that does to a society as you propose. What did you find can be done about the things that you`re scaring with?

FRANKLIN FOER, THE ATLANTIC STAFF WRITER: Well, a lot of my book is about the power of four companies Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Apple, which are these incredibly powerful monopolies. And part of power is that they stand between us and information and that they`ve acquired all this control that they can exert without a whole lot of our awareness of their control over markets, over media, over information, and to an extent over our democracy. And when you look at the way the Russians operated over the course of the last election, they had a pretty acute understanding of the power of these networks and the vulnerability of the networks. And what we`ve seen is that Facebook, for instance, doesn`t really take much responsibility for what it does and it has created this situation where it has powerful network where people can be manipulated very easily and they`re just very vulnerable to the type of exploitation that bad actors can exert.

MELBER: Right. You talk about Facebook and I mentioned you worked for a former Facebook co-founder. I remember during the 2016 campaign, Roger Stone said it was only Podesta`s time in the barrel. It seems like to some in California, it`s Mark Zuckerberg`s time in the barrel. You write that he basically allowed through Facebook the posting of a steady stream of fabricated right-wing conspiracies that boosted Donald Trump`s candidacy, and you say it`s galling to watch Zuckerberg walk away from the catastrophic collapse of the news business and the degradation of American civic culture because this sign has played such a seminal role in both.

FOER: What Facebook has done is it`s created these two hive minds that are highly susceptible to fake news and propaganda because we want to hear things that confirm our biases. And so, if we get news that seems to confirm our biases, we don`t really check the authority of that news or the veracity of the news. We tend to accept it. And I think that Zuckerberg deserves to be held to account for that.

MELBER: Last question to you Shawn then. What else has to be done so we are less vulnerable to these types of hacks?

HENRY: So we`re talking about the types of hacks related to these energy companies. I think there are a number of things. First of all, organizations have to be much more proactive in constantly assessing their environment and hunting for malicious software and adversaries who are actually in their environment. And then beyond that, I think there`s got to be more from a government perspective in terms of how do we deal with nation`s states? How do we define what the red lines are? And that if you cross the red lines, is to what the repercussions are going to be? We`re in a world now that is completely connected and when we see an attack like this, we`re going to see some cascading impact and it`s going to be devastating. As Franklin has described in his book, nation states have to have these discussions to set the tone and ensure that we`re working in the proper parameter to save our country.

MELBER: Right. And the main thing about Franklin`s book, don`t read it right before bed. It is not that time to read.

FOER: It`s not that scary.

MELBER: It is. It will keep you up at night. But buy it either way. Franklin, thanks (INAUDIBLE), Shawn, your law enforcement experience always valuable. Thank you, both.

And don`t to go bed just yet either. Ahead, how fake deadlines in Chuck Schumer`s a hot mic led to that torching. And also, it`s Friday, so you also know what that means on THE BEAT. It`s time to "FALLBACK." Stay with us.


MELBER: It`s easy to forget Republicans wanted this month to be about taxes. An agenda item that was supposed to unite the GOP as it returned from Congressional Recess in a way that Health Care and Immigration has not. Republicans trying to spotlight taxes but then Donald Trump got involved and he made life worse in a very particular way. First, Trump overreacted to immigration pressure from the right. It`s a legal fact that Trump could continue or end protection for the DREAMers. It`s an executive order. He holds the cards. But when Republican AGs picked a fight with Trump and set a manufactured deadline for when they`d sue over DREAMers, the White House can get sued by anyone. It didn`t mean anything but Trump took the bait. This was not a real deadline. It was a plan to file a lawsuit.

As NBC reported at that time, some though began treating the suit as a concrete deadline and it was not one. So Trump responded with that announcement that he would deport DREAMers as those Republicans AGs wanted but in six months from now. A new made up deadline. And that drew blowback from another wing of the Republican Party, plus Democrats, plus some business leaders, so Trump started reacting to his reaction to the lawsuit threat huddling with Schumer and Pelosi and trying to stake out a new plan to protect DREAMers from deportation. And here`s what`s important about that. He didn`t have to rush that plan out either. His own deadline is six months away and again this was supposed to be tax month. But Trump did rush which led to Schumer celebrating his strategic breakthrough in that hot mic moment.


SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY), MINORITY LEADER: He likes us. He likes me anyway. Mr. President, you`re much better off if you can sometimes step right and sometimes step left. If I have to step just in one direction, you`re boxed.


MELBER: And that candid moment raises the question what`s hotter than a hot mic on the Senate floor? The answer is a Trump hat on fire.

So you see the hat, getting that Fahrenheit 451 treatment from some Trump supporters, burning the icon of Trumpism. And that reportedly had Trump fuming like one of his red-hot hat. Now, let`s be clear. Expressive speech is protected in America. The courts protect your right to burn our sacred flag. You certainly can burn any political object you want. It may even give some people an impulsive pleasure. As Ray Bradbury explores in his book warning against censorship, Fahrenheit 451, it was a pleasure to burn a special pleasure to see things eaten, to see things blackened and changed. But starting a fire is also dangerous because you can only control where it starts, never where it ends.

And there are two political fires burning right now. One from Trump supporters enraged by that broken promise and one from Trump who had no factual reason to dive into the DREAMers debate before he had a plan ready and that was the first fire he set when he was apparently indifferent to the cards he held. The second fire burning from Trump getting outsmarted both by the GOP leaders who originally pushed him to do something on DREAMers before he was ready, then by these Democratic leaders pushing back. And what does it mean to get outsmarted by leaders like that?


TRUMP: Our leadership is stupid. These are stupid people. So bad, these are stupid, stupid people and they`re leading us right down the tubes.



MELBER: It`s Friday on THE BEAT and that means it`s time to "FALLBACK." Your favorite segment with its own soundtrack. "FALLBACK" is a chance to tell someone from this week to chill out relax or maybe even reassess. Your choices, Joan Walsh back with us along with Comedian Seth Herzog, again Jamal Simmons. Joan, who needs to fall back?

JOAN WALSH, MSNBC NATION`S NATIONAL AFFAIRS CORRESPONDENT: Obviously Sara Huckabee Sanders. She really needs to stop telling ESPN to fire Jemele Hill. Jemele did go out on Twitter and call Donald Trump a white supremacist but there`s a danger Ari, as you know, when you defend white supremacists, you might get child a white supremacist and you might be one. And honestly, if she should be fired, then we`ve got to go -- we`ve got to take the way back machine, not just the fallback machine so that NBC can fire Donald Trump for claiming that Barack Obama was not born in the United States.

MELBER: Right. You`re saying if we`re going to discipline people for these opinions.

WALSH: So Sarah, come on, just leave it alone. You`ve got a lot more problems.

MELBER: Seth, who needs to fall back?

SETH HERZOG, AMERICAN COMEDIAN: Steve Mnuchin needs to fall back. Enough. First of all, buy a vowel. There`s enough consonants in a row. I don`t even understand. It`s like three C, Zs, anyway. His whole opinion, he flies down to Kentucky to see the eclipse but then they accuse him of using a government plane. He`s like I use government plane. Why do I even care about the eclipse? I`m from New York. New Yorkers don`t care about eclipse.

MELBER: Yes, he says, people in Kentucky took this up very seriously. Being a New Yorker, I was like the eclipse, really. I don`t have any interest in watching the eclipse being a New Yorker.

WALSH: That`s a lie.

HERZOG: I never seen such an arrogant nerd in my entire life. Unbelievable.

MELBER: Is that the typology you see?

HERZOG: That is the typology I see. I also --


HERZOG: I also see --

MELBER: What does it say?

HERZOG: But I mean, also -- like New Yorkers went crazy.

WALSH: I was on the Great Hill with like thousands of people in Central Park.

HERZOG: There was a run on the glasses.

WALSH: We shared our glasses. I mean, it`s so -- it was so awesome.

HERZOG: You had to. People were going crazy for those shades. It felt like the end -- the end of the world. It felt like that because everyone was like, I need glasses.

MELBER: Yes, Jamal, who needs to fall back.

JAMAL SIMMONS, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Yes, I started out this segment wanting to have a good fun time about this guy of (INAUDIBLE) in California who wanted to get rid of J.J. Abrams from the Star Wars movies. But then Joan Walsh in that first segment we did just brought me down. I cannot -- I cannot believe that Donald Trump -- so I looked it up while this was -- while we were off air for a bit. Donald Trump is actually selling those hats for $40 a piece on his website.

MELBER: On disaster tours.

SIMMONS: That means the President of the United States (INAUDIBLE) is on a disaster tour and he`s selling baseball cap merchandise. The -- he claims to be a billionaire. I just can`t -- you know, I`ve been in and around the presidency in my entire adult life, I have a lot of respect for it and it`s like the president is running a long con. I can`t believe --

WALSH: Do you think?

SIMMONS: -- that this guy is in the office.

MELBER: It`s incredible. I have one that is really important, I mean, really significant fall back as something we`ve been talking about here on THE BEAT. I`m going to play a commercial and then explain to you who needs to fall back. Take a look at this.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: What we did do has we introduced pumpkin to spice. Us here, Starbucks, we said, hey pumpkin, meet spice. You guys are going to be best friends. I kid but they are.


MELBER: I think I need pumpkin spice to fall back. It is a flavor that we`re seeing running all over every category. We`ve checked Pringles, salmon, salsa, glue sticks, cheese, you don`t know pumpkin spice Pringles, Seth.

HERZOG: Have you had it?

MELBER: No, if I`m telling pumpkin spice Pringles to fall back, that means I`m not eating it. Come on.

HERZOG: Maybe you should have one first. They`re spicy and pumpkiny.

WALSH: No, I`m with Ari. It`s got to -- it`s got to fall back. It`s got to go. It should be banished -- it all should be banished.

MELBER: What about solutions? I vote for more gingerbread latte. I was about to say that, oh my god.

MELBER: It`s the best -- it`s the best flavor latte.

HERZOG: I love the heat that`s happening here.

WALSH: Yes. Nature, nature.

MELBER: We have fun. No one knows to this day what this segment is about, this "FALLBACK" segment.

WALSH: We don`t.

MELBER: We don`t know who what it is. Joan, Seth, Jamal --

HERZOG: Thank you, Joan.

MELBER: Thank you all. I will be back at 10:00 p.m. Eastern filling in for Lawrence O`Donnell. Right now though, you can see "HARDBALL" with Chris Matthews now.



Copy: Content and programming copyright 2017 MSNBC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Copyright 2017 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.