IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

All In With Chris Hayes, Transcript 11/22/2016

Guests: Eric Lipton, Silvina Sterin Pensel, Maxine Waters, David Cay Johnston, Masha Gessen, Nick Confessore

Show: ALL IN with CHRIS HAYES Date: November 22, 2016 Guest: Eric Lipton, Silvina Sterin Pensel, Maxine Waters, David Cay Johnston, Masha Gessen, Nick Confessore

CHRIS MATTHEWS, MSNBC HOST: Thanks for being with us. "ALL IN" with Chris Hayes starts right now.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CHRIS HAYES, MSNBC HOST: Tonight on ALL IN.

KARL ROVE, FORMER WHITE HOUSE DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF: This is going to be thorny. It`s a blind trust to his kids.

HAYES: Donald Trump continues to do business, saying, quote, "The president can`t have a conflict of interest."

RICHARD NIXON, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.

HAYES: Tonight, reports of Trump`s influence on business dealings in Argentina, and against wind turbines near Trump golf courses.

DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT-ELECT OF THE UNITED STATES: We`ve got all these windmills all over the place going -- driving you loco when you look at them, right?

HAYES: Then, another Washington Post bombshell. The Trump Foundation admits it violated IRS rules, as Trump takes the on the media.

KELLYANNE CONWAY: He is the president and they are the press, and they have to find a way to mutually assured, I would say, nondestruction.

HAYES: Plus, making sense of Trump`s newfound benevolence towards Hillary Clinton.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Well, so much for locking her up, I guess.

HAYES: And President Obama bestows his final medals of freedom.

BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: This is what makes us the greatest nation on earth.

HAYES: When ALL IN starts right now.

OBAMA: This is America.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

HAYES: Good evening from New York. I`m Chris Hayes. Donald Trump was defiant today in the face of growing bipartisan criticism and grave concern over the unprecedented conflicts of interest that have arisen as the President-elect mixes the business of the American people with his ongoing efforts to expand his personal business empire. "Prior to the election, it was well known that I have interests in properties all over the world", Trump tweeting last night, "Only the crooked media makes this a big deal!" Trump expanded on those comments in an interview today with reporters, from what he likes to call, the failing New York Times, there he is entering the lobby. After about selling his company to resolve the conflicts, Trump responded, quote, "That`s a really hard thing to do because I have real estate."

He also said that his daughter Ivanka, who will help run his business empire, in what the Trump camp falsely calls a blind trust, quote, "If it were up to some people, I would never ever see my daughter Ivanka again." Trump also telling The Times, quote, "The law is totally on my side. The president can`t have a conflict of interest." That comment echoing one infamously made by Richard Nixon in 1977, in an interview after his resignation with Journalist David Frost.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DAVID FROST, BRITISH JOURNALIST: So, what in a sense you are saying is that there are certain situations, and the Houston plan, and that part of it was one of them, where the president can decide that it`s in the best interest in the nation or something and do something illegal.

NIXON: Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

HAYES: Trump is under increasing pressure to address his conflicts of interest including from conservatives. The New York Posts today, echoing the conservative Wall Street Journal with an editorial calling on Trump to, quote, "Clean this up." The Post op-ed editor tweeting, "If it were Clinton, we`d be howling." Karl Rove stating on Fox News that Trump is potentially poised for years of controversy.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ROVE: This is going to be thorny. It`s a blind trust to his kids? Now, typically, a blind trust has to be a liquid assets and independent directors. If he just simply takes his empire buildings and turns it over to his kids, that not - that may not meet the test and he can be embroiled for years in controversy about this.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

HAYES: Those comments follow another new revelation, suggesting Trump is using the presidency to further his business interests. You may have noticed on the campaign trail, that Trump repeatedly railed against the seemingly odd target.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: Wind is very tough because those windmills are very, very expensive, and they kill the birds and they look very terrible. Isn`t it amazing the way the environments love the windmills and yet they kill all the birds?

A wind turbine that kills all the bald eagles all over (INAUDIBLE) on me, that`s OK with them, right? Even though it needs subsidy.

The wind kills all your birds, all your birds killed. You know the environmentalists never talk about that. And I wouldn`t exactly say it makes your farmlands look beautiful. You`ve got all these windmills all over the place going -- driving you loco when you look at them, right?

(END VIDEO CLIP)

HAYES: All your birds killed. Seems a bit of a weird obsession, right, until you know this. Trump has long fought to prevent the construction of an offshore wind farm near one of his golf courses in Scotland, going so far as to file a lawsuit to try to stop it. Trump even tweeted about the proposed wind farm a whopping 60 times. After his victory in the presidential election, Trump met at Trump tower with Nigel Farage, the interim leader of Britain`s Anti-Immigrant U.K. Independence Party, who Trump today suggested should be U.K. Ambassador to the U.S. even though that job is, well, already taken.

And at their meeting The New York Times reports Trump encouraged Farage and his entourage to oppose the kind of offshore wind farms that Trump believes will mar the pristine view at his golf course. A Trump`s spokesperson initially denied the conversation took place, but it was detailed by one of the meeting attendees who said Trump explicitly urged him to campaign against wind farms in Britain. Asked about that request today, Trump told times reporters, quote, "I might have brought it up."

Joining me now the man who broke the news, New York Times Investigative reporter Washington bureau Eric Lipton. And Eric, I mean, this is sort of extraordinary because these are - these meetings are happening with the President-elect of the United States, a man who is about to be -- arguably the most powerful man in the world, ostensibly about the people`s business, essential in his official capacity as President-elect. ERIC LIPTON, NEW YORK TIMES INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER: Right, and that`s the problem, is that you don`t really know when is it - what is he talking about behind these closed doors that the press is not given briefings on what is said. We don`t even know who is there necessarily, we didn`t know for example that there were these Indian real estate executives who were visiting his office and that he`s partnered with in India and building a high-rise towers there. So -- and we don`t even know all of - all of the people that he owes money to, we don`t have a full list of his debt. So, the problem is mostly not that these are all real conflicts but we just don`t know where the conflicts begin and end.

HAYES: In this case, I mean, you`ve also got him explicitly using a meeting that is, again, ostensibly under the sort of purview of his role as President-elect of the United States to very explicitly lobbying for something for his business interests and then denying it, or at least his people saying it didn`t happen, until someone else in the room says it did.

LIPTON: Right, you certainly - and you would think that once he`s elected, he would stop promoting the interests of his hotels, his golf course, and all of his other properties. He shouldn`t be discussing matters relating to his, you know, corporation now that he`s essentially a public official, and he -- we keep getting examples of him doing that and when we find out about it, we feel compelled to write about it, and he seems to think that it`s not a big matter of concern.

And in addition to that, he repeatedly appears to be inviting Ivanka to participate in conversations he has with world leaders including she sat in on a meeting with the Prime Minister of Japan. She participated apparently in a telephone conversation with the President of Argentina, and she is the Head of International Marketing and Development for the hotel chain. It would be pretty advantageous for someone who is in that position to have access to the world leaders of, you know, countries around the world through their father.

And so, I mean, you know, and you also wonder, you know, do foreign countries feel like, "Well, maybe we should take a lot of rooms out from this hotel because that would be a way of sending a message to Donald Trump that we want his help."

HAYES: Or after a conversation, I mean, they might -- there`s so many different ways in which this could sort of cascade even without any explicit quid pro quo, right? I mean, you can imagine of foreign entity thinking, "Oh, we should give a regulatory pass to this permit of this development or we should expedite this certain request through whatever official channels we can to make the President-elect or the president happy."

LIPTON: Yeah, that`s the problem. So every time there`s a permit that the Trump organization is going to be pursuing, there`s going to be - everyone`s going to look at it and wonder did they get special treatment? And you`ll never really be able to know because, you know, you don`t have the visibility into the permitting process, but we will be compelled to write these stories to raise those questions. We`ll interview these -- the officials in charge of issuing the permits, we`ll look for the possibility of special favoritism. It`s an endless thing.

I mean, every time the corporation does anything, we`re going to be compelled to be -- trying to ask, is there a conflict here? And that`s why you have from the Wall Street Journal to President Obama to Karl Rove to the New York Post, all saying that the only real solution here is to, you know, do something radical, which is to perhaps liquidate his properties.

HAYES: All right. Eric Lipton, thanks for your time tonight. I appreciate it.

LIPTON: Thank you.

HAYES: The most direct and worrying report we had so far about Trump potentially using his office to enrich himself, about the claim for a prominent Argentine journalist that when Argentine President Mauricio Macri called President-elect Trump to congratulate him on his election, Trump asked Macri to deal with permitting issues that are currently holding up a building. Trump wants to build in Argentina, which have been stalled since 2007. Both the Trump camp and the Macri camp denied the allegations, but that is far from the end of the story.

Here to fill us in, Argentine Journalist Silvina Sterin Pensel, New York Correspondent for television network Todo Noticias. Great to have you here.

SILVINA STERIN PENSEL, NEW YORK CORRESPONDENT FOR TELEVISION NETWORK TODO NOTICIAS: Thank you. Great being here.

HAYES: OK. So, both official channels have denied it, right?

PENSEL: Yes, exactly. Both camps said no. And so, many media, not you, so, you know, they accepted these nos.

HAYES: Right, they both said no.

PENSEL: The bible.

HAYES: Right, but there`s a little more to the story. Here`s - I want to show -- there`s Eric Trump on the night of election night with the partners in this proposed Yaryura Yellati -

PENSEL: Yelati, yes.

HAYES: -- who --

PENSEL: That`s Y Y -

HAYES: YY, there`s a development group that Trump group has partnered with. They`re there on election night. This is an active project they`re trying to get built.

PENSEL: Of course, yeah, yeah. It`s active and they also build with the same developer a tower in Punta del Este, in neighboring Uruguay, but you know, for YY, it`s business. They are not the President-elect.

HAYES: Right.

PENSEL: So the problem I would say it`s not in their hands, it`s more that the outrageous thing is that the President-elect uses call to receive congratulations from the Argentine President and then uses that moment, that space to tell them, "Hey, why don`t you just speed up things with those permits."

HAYES: Which again, they have denied officially, but we don`t know. And now, you have a situation in which if the permitting does come through and the tower gets magically built, everybody wonders what -- how did this happen?

PENSEL: Exactly. Apparently, the building has been stalled. It`s a 35- story building that`s going to be named the Trump Office, and it`s in a former parking garage in a very pricey area near to the obelisk and in the widest avenue on earth, which is in Buenos Aires, Avenue 9 de Julio. And so, you know, the thing is that it has to go back to the city legislature, to the city council.

HAYES: To get its permit.

PENSEL: Exactly. So, maybe Mr. Trump wanted to speed things up and the outrageous thing is that Ivanka Trump was also part of that call.

HAYES: This is the key. Right.

PENSEL: So, he`s saying, OK, my kids, my adult kids are going to be entirely focused on business and --

HAYES: She`s running the international marketing and she gets on - I mean, that`s the one thing we have confirmed, right? So, they deny officially that this happened but we do know that she was on the call. She`s the Head of International Marketing -- PENSEL: Officially, what the - what authorities are saying from Mr. Macri`s camp is that, you know, they`ve known each other since yesteryears, and so when Macri said, "Oh, how`s Ivanka doing?" Mr. President-elect Trump said, "Oh, she`s actually here. Let me pass her on to you."

HAYES: And yet every, I mean, and yet every one of these interactions which all may be totally by the board, as Eric Lipton was saying, they all carry with them by definition the possibility of conflict.

PENSEL: Yeah, it`s exactly what Mr. Trump was criticizing Mrs. Clinton, that pay for play, and the actual question is, why didn`t she exploit that more?

HAYES: Yeah, that`s a good point.

PENSEL: Because it`s the same. Only that instead of maybe paying to rebuild Haiti, it`s paying to have golf courses or Trump --

HAYES: Or Trump Tower in Buenos Aires. Silvina Sterin Pensel, thank you for the update. I appreciate it. Good to have you here.

Joining me now is Democratic Representative Maxine Waters of California, Ranking Member of the House Financial Services Committee today with her democratic colleagues sends a letter to inspector general at multiple agencies calling on them to investigate Trump`s conflict of interest.

And Congressman, I`ll begin with the statement Mr. Trump President-elect said today, which appears to be true. I mean, as a matter of American statutory law, he says, there are no - there are no conflicts of interest for the president. What do you say to that?

MAXINE WATERS, U.S. REPRESENTATIVE FOR CALIFORNIA: Well, I`m very much aware of that. The President and the Vice President are not held to the same ethical standards as Members of Congress. However, the conflict - the potential conflicts of interest with this president is going to take this country on a rollercoaster. I tell you, he enters the Office of the Presidency of without us knowing anything about his personal finances, about his taxes, and I believe that there are potential conflicts in so many different places. Just look for example at the fact of that hotel in Washington, D.C., the new hotel. That`s the general services has the power to determine the worth and the value of the lease. They`re leasing -

HAYES: That`s right.

WATERS: -- from the United States government. He is in an argument now with the GSA about the value of that lease, and he wants to pay less taxes, et cetera, et cetera. Now, don`t forget, he appoints all of these heads of these various agencies and he has the power by which to influence them. What happens when he appoints the head of GSA and Donald Trump is not happy with the amount of taxes that he`s paying for the lease that he`s got? Will he influence him? I tell you, the potential conflicts of interest are everywhere.

I was just taking a deep look at Deutsche Bank and the fact that Deutsche Bank has lent him about $2.5 billion over the last two decades. And he owes them now about $370 million. Deutsche Bank is a bad bank. We have fined them on any number of occasions, for example, I believe it is the Federal Housing Finance Agency fined them 1.9.2 billion -- $1.925 billion for fraudulent stuff that they were involved in, and then we had the Department of Justice that fined them $1,525,000,000 for some other fraudulent activity. And right now the Department of Justice is about to fine Deutsche Bank about, oh, I think, $14 billion for fraud that it was involved in with the mortgage crisis. And so, just think he owes them all of this money. He appoints the Attorney General.

HAYES: Right.

WATERS: What is he going to do to protect his interests? What is he going to do about the fact that Deutsche Bank may be thrown out of business practically having to pay $14 billion in fines and is he going to try and save them with the Attorney General? It`s a mess, and it goes further than even I`ve attempted to explain to you here this evening. It`s bad.

HAYES: All right. Representative Maxine Waters, thanks for your time tonight, appreciate it.

WATERS: You`re welcome.

HAYES: Still to come, a new bombshell report in the Trump Foundation. The group reportedly admitting on a tax filing that charitable funds were misused to benefit members of the foundation. More on that after the break.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

HAYES: A stunning admission today in the ongoing story of the Trump Foundation. The foundation has literally admitted in its most recent IRS filing to violating a ban on self-dealing or using a charity`s money to benefit yourself. And in the same 2015 IRS filing, it has admitted to a similar violation in a prior unspecified year or years. Raising the possibility, Donald Trump himself signed under penalty of perjury an IRS filing that was false. Here are the details.

The Trump Foundation`s IRS tax filing for 2015 obtained by The Washington Post, certain simple questions weren`t answered. In one section of the form, the IRS asked if the Trump Foundation had transferred income or assets to a disqualified person? The disqualified person in this context might be Trump, the foundation`s president or a member of his family or a Trump-owned business. The foundation checked yes.

Here`s the actual tax document. The admission is stunning for several reasons. In David Fahrenthold`s extensive investigative reporting on the Trump Foundation, he has revealed how it appeared to pay legal settlements to end lawsuits out of the foundation (INAUDIBLE) paid for items that Trump (INAUDIBLE) like purchased to charity auctions like portraits of himself. And those are just some of the potential instances of self-dealing Fahrenthold has uncovered, instances that might count as income or assets to a disqualified person.

Now, we don`t know which of those examples or other instances caused that IRS form to be checked yes, but we know it was checked yes, and the form signed by Foundation trustee, Donald Bender.

We also know this, another line in the form after the Trump Foundation had engaged in any acts of self-dealing in prior years, the Trump Foundation checked yes again. As Fahrenthold reports, this appeared to be the first time the Trump Foundation had admitted such a violation. And since Donald Trump himself signed the Trump Foundation IRS filings in previous years, it is entirely possible Trump signed under penalty of perjury an IRS finding that was false.

Joining me now from Berlin, Germany, David Cay Johnston, Pulitzer Price and columnist of The Daily Beast, author of "The Making of Donald Trump" and a tax law expert. All right. Let`s start with this. I mean, how often is it that you just get an admission in a foundation filing saying, "Yes, we engaged in self-dealings?"

DAVID CAY JOHNSTON, COLUMNIST AT THE DAILY BEAST: Well, a number of people will admit, Chris, to wrong doing if they are fearful that they`re about to be prosecuted. Now, some attorneys will tell you don`t do anything if you`re subject to prosecution. Some defense lawyers will tell you "straighten up your act and clean it out." And in this case, these acts that Donald Trump committed over multiple years could make him subject to criminal prosecution because the justice department`s very exquisitely developed standards require that you commit multiple acts of trying to defeat the tax system, and there are - the acts that we know of that are illegal at the foundation are not all in one year.

HAYES: This is a key point. I mean, they`re admitting in prior - that last year and prior year, there is a pretty suggestive trail laid out by Fahrenthold that this foundation has been used in all kinds of ways that would legally meet the threshold of self-dealing, violations of tax law, and those forms are signed by Donald Trump. It does seem that there`s an - on the surface, there`s sort of a prima facie case for some possibly criminal exposure.

JOHNSTON: Well, Chris, this is a very important point, the justice department always says that we have a uniform policy. The reason the tax prosecutions are referred to a special section of justice is everybody is to be treated the same. Well, in Donald Trump`s case, we have at least nine illegal acts that we know of because of David Fahrenthold`s reporting committed by The Trump Foundation.

You have to also look at this in the background of the fact that Donald Trump confessed to sales tax fraud in the past, that his 1984 income tax return has badges of fraud as shown by testimony in a trial, and that he won`t produce his tax returns now. And if we`re going to have uniform application of the laws, then I think my call and that of some tax law professors for a criminal investigation by the IRS is more than appropriate.

HAYES: And I just have to ask you this because you`ve covered this area for a very long time. You won a Pulitzer at the times for your tax reporting, and you`ve covered this campaign. And think for a moment, Hillary Clinton admitted that she had broken tax law on documents she signed that the Clinton Foundation had violated IRS tax law and engaged in self-dealing. Can you imagine the scope, if that happened during the campaign, particularly of the media freakout over that?

JOHNSTON: Oh, I think it would have gotten tremendous coverage and Donald Trump would have taken his "crooked Hillary" line and gone much further with it. What you`re seeing here is Donald trying to get out of the way before he takes office any problems that he has, but if we`re going to have uniform application of the laws, if we are a nation of laws and not men, then there is more than ample evidence for a criminal investigation of Donald Trump`s tax returns and anything less than that, would suggest very strongly the official favoritism, which was complained about by two New Jersey Casino Control commissioners when he was a casino owner, and that we have seen in other government proceedings.

HAYES: You talked about cleaning things up. The other story from -- this is just the first two weeks in which this individual has been President- elect of the United States. Settling a $25 million fraud lawsuit over Trump University. Obviously, that`s not something you want hanging over your head as president. It seems like that went into it. But again, this is a fairly unprecedented territory, the President-elect settling an eight- figure fraud lawsuit.

JOHNSTON: Well, and here`s what`s troubling, Chris, about that decision. Donald Trump had no defenses as a matter of law as the Texas attorney general`s consumer rights lawyers pointed out when they tried to get action taken against Trump, and then the attorney general and now Governor of Texas Greg Abbott instead said, "Well, if you leave the state and don`t do any more business, we`ll let it go."

The settlement particularly by Eric Schneiderman, the New York Attorney General, did not require an admission of wrongdoing. Donald Trump put out a promotional video in which he said, "You`ll get a better education than the best business schools. I will personally pick the faculty." All of that was untrue and the advice that was given to people was, in many cases, contrary to law. This was a straight-out scam from the beginning, and I think it`s shocking that e Eric Schneiderman settled this case without an admission of wrongdoing.

Now, the two private cases in California, the class actions, I understand is a practical aspect. Eric Schneiderman has a larger duty than the individuals who got ripped off in New York, he has a duty to enforce the law. And I hope you invite him on the show and ask him to justify this special treatment and not requiring an admission of wrongdoing.

HAYES: All right. David Cay Johnston, thank you very much for your time, and I appreciate it.

Coming up, the bizarre lead-up to Donald Trump`s meeting with The New York Times. An outlet he continues to attack as president-elect. More on that, just ahead.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation because there has never been so many lies, so much deception, there has never been anything like it.

HILLARY CLINTON, FORMER DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: It`s just awfully good that someone with the temperament of Donald Trump is not in charge of the law in our country.

TRUMP: Because you`d be in jail.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

HAYES: Oh, he is, sort of, in charge of the law of our country in a certain way or will be soon. Donald Trump`s promise to jail his political opponent was a rallying cry for his campaign, "lock her up," which they chanted at rally after rally at the RNC, but today, the president-elect seemed to renege on that pledge.

During an on-the-record meeting at The New York Times, Trump said he has no interest in pushing for Clinton to be prosecuted, quote, "I want to move forward. I don`t want to move back. I don`t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don`t." The backlash from some of his supporters and political allies was swift broken promises, the headline at Breitbart, the hard-right website whose former chairman is Steve Bannon is, of course, Trump`s incoming Chief White House Strategist.

That was later replaced by a much more forgiving headline focused on Trump`s purported concern about divisiveness. Judicial Watch, the right- wing group that sued Clinton for access to her private e-mails, said in a statement that declining the prosecutor would be a betrayal of Trump`s promise to the American people to "drain the swamp" of out-of-control corruption in Washington D.C.

There was a tweet from Trump super fan Ann Coulter, "Whoa! I thought we elected Donald Trump president. Did we make him the FBI and DOJ? His job is to pick those guys, not do their jobs." The strange thing is Ann Coulter is exactly right. It`s not the president`s job to decide who the Department of Justice does or does not prosecute like some kind of monarch sending his subjects to the gallows. And Trump doesn`t get to decide through his kingly mercy and personal sympathy to the family to spare the Clintons that ordeal. That`s not how due process works in our justice system. The new president-elect doesn`t seem to know that, however. It`s just one of the ways he seems to be following the playbook used by undemocratic leaders the world over.

Coming up, my interviewer with a reporter who knows a thing or two about covering autocrats, Russian journalist Masha Gessen.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

KELLYANNE CONWAY, SENIOR TRUMP ADVISER: President Trump and the media have to share joint custody of the nation and its people for the next four or eight years. So it`s highly productive and in everyone`s interests to find a way to do that.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

HAYES: As Donald Trump transitions, senior adviser Kellyanne Conway talked about finding a way to work with the media. But it`s still unclear if the president-elect is in agreement. For instance, Trump held an off the record meeting yesterday with anchors and TV executives, including members of NBC and MSNBC.

The New Yorker spoke to people who didn`t care much for the off the record, apparently, who attended that meeting reporting for more than 20 minutes Trump railed against outrageous and dishonest coverage, another participant in the meeting said that Trump`s behavior was totally inappropriate and "f`ing outrageous."

Trump`s aggressive relationship with the media was on public display this morning. He was scheduled to have an on the record sitdown with The New York Times around 7:00 a.m. tweeted, I canceled today`s meeting with the failing New York Times when the terms and conditions of the meeting were changed at the last minute. Not nice.

The Times spokesperson said the paper had not changed the arrangements for the meeting, was not aware it had been canceled until reading Mr. Trump`s Twitter post.

Then about a half hour later, Trump seemed more open-minded, tweeting, perhaps a new meeting will be set up with The New York Times. In the meantime, they continue to cover me inaccurately and with a nasty tone.

Trump didn`t mention any story in particular, however the front page of the Times the story ran a story with the headline "Donald Trump`s business dealings test a constitutional limit."

They do.

But then as if nothing had happened Trump tweeted the meeting was back on and he was looking forward to it. The meeting lasted about an hour. Trump took questions on everything from Syria to his potential conflicts of interest with his businesses, to of course his relationship with The New York Times, all of which was live tweeted.

Joining me now, New York Times reporter Nick Confessore who is a political reporter there and an MSNBC contributor.

So, here`s what I find sort of fascinating about this situation.

NICK CONFESSORE, THE NEW YORK TIMES: Tell me.

HAYES: He is really into attacking The New York Times. And it strikes me that it`s a way of he can unilaterally -- The New York Times is an objective paper. It covers everyone without fear or favor, that`s I think the way it views itself.

CONFESSORE: That`s the idea, anyway.

HAYES: ...institutionally.

But if he attacks The New York Times unilaterally, it`s a way of sort of communicating to people like, oh, they`re the bad guys and they are on the other side. And he has the power to cast you guys as essentially biased.

CONFESSORE: We are the foil, and the whole media is the foil for him. He is a competing outlet, and we are the foil of the object of his attention.

I think we`ll see this for the rest of his presidency. When he wants to target or have a deflection from things he`s done or above criticism he`ll go after the media institutions. And he is uniquely positioned to do so. He has a huge Twitter following and Facebook following. And again he is his own outlet. He can do this. It`s life now.

HAYES: You know, it struck me that, you know he -- part of the reason this man was able to become elected president with these historically high unfavorables is he lost the popular vote by 2 million votes, and no one has done that before and gotten to take the White House. But he was running against someone who was also unpopular in her own way, and it was a forced choice.

And it occurs to me that what`s happening now is Hillary Clinton`s gone. It`s no longer like you have got to choose one of us. The media is now the new Hillary Clinton. Because the media is one of the most, you know, reviled, distrusted institutions in American life. So now he can set it up as this wrestling match where he`s the face and you guys and us are the heel.

CONFESSORE: Look, you can`t lose a fight crapping on the media in America. And we have to think about how we earn back that trust and think about how we can report in ways that people recognize that`s true to their experience. But, look, it`s also our job to speak truth to power and cover the people who are powerful and in power. And we`ll keep doing that.

But yeah, he`s going to keep coming after us, because without Hillary Clinton around, we are the opponent and we`ll always be.

HAYES: There`s this line -- Masha Gessen (ph) who we`re going to have on later in the show sort of writing about her experience covering Putin in sort of authoritarian regimes, and she`s talking about watching Donald Trump. She says the national press is likely to be among the first institutional victims of Trumpism. And this is a really important point. There is no law that requires presidential administration to hold daily briefings, none that guarantees media access to the White House. Many journalists may soon face a dilemma long familiar to those of us who have worked under autocracies -- fall in line or forfeit access.

The point here about these traditions -- I mean, everyone freaked out about him leaving the protective pool to go to dinner. Protective pool isn`t enshrined in law. Daily briefings aren`t enshrined in law. I mean, he could just only give out lists to Breitbart and Fox News for four years.

CONFESSORE: He could.

Look, I think reporters have a duty to try to explain these institutions and conventions, which are all rooted in our obligations to the public, not to us as reporters. And so we have to do that.

I also think that some of those obligations are weird to most people and he will take advantage of that.

HAYES: Right. Like, why can`t I go to dinner?

CONFESSORE: Yeah, why can`t I? And the answer is like we have an obligation to the public to be covering the most important person in the world at all times. And that`s what we have to explain to people. That that`s important to them, not us, to them.

HAYES: And we`ve seen some ways in ways this access is important. For instance, Ivanka Trump, who is the head of Trump Org International Marketing sat in with Shinzo Abe, the Japanese leader, a thing we only learned from the Japanese press, because they were taking photos and the American press were excluded.

CONFESSORE: Yeah, look, it`s kind of a two-edged sword, access in this administration. It`s always important to reporters in different degrees, but Trump is his own media outlet. He`s out there all the time. His thoughts are on Twitter. And in a sense he will live his presidency on social media in a way that few other presidents have.

But I think you can`t trade access for good reporting, and if the price of good reporting is losing access, you always pick the reporting. You have to. It`s our duty. It`s our obligation.

HAYES: Yeah, I thought it was impressive today in The New York Times institutionally to make the demand for that to be on the record, to hold to that demand, and ultimately be successful and ultimately have a really interesting exchange.

I mean you talked about everything from General Mattis talking him out of torture, apparently, to possibly being open to continuing the Paris Climate accords to a statement we led the show with that he doesn`t have any conflict of interests sort of definitionally as a president of the United States.

CONFESSORE: Yeah, I mean, I feel like this exchange taught us a lot about his views and his plans going forward, which is the whole point of journalism. It`s not the only one. But to understand what he thinks he`s about to do, what his obligations are, is useful to the public. Having it on the record is important because everybody can see all the cards on the table, and that`s why it was a good thing for him and I think for the public.

HAYES: Nick Confessore of the crown jewel of American journalism.

CONFESSORE: Says Donald Trump.

HAYES: Says Donald Trump. Crown jewel. It`s going to be on your next subscription drive.

Good to see you.

Still ahead, why after just two weeks as President-elect, Donald Trump`s praise for Vladimir Putin`s style of leadership is taking on new meaning. More on that coming up.

Plus, another White House last for President Obama. That`s tonight`s Thing One, Thing Two next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

HAYES: Thing One tonight, President Obama has awarded his very last Medals of Freedom, bestowing the nation`s highest civilian honor on 21 recipients at the White House today. According to the ashington Post, Obama has now set the record for most presidential Medals of Freedom, awarding it 114 times during his tenure at the White House. Today, he was in rare form for his final Medal of Freedom ceremony, paying homage and cracking jokes, the highlights Thing Two in 60 seconds.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

HAYES: Today, President Obama awarded the Medal of Freedom to 21 people who he says have helped push America forward from scientists, activists, educators and philanthropists to actors like Sicily Tyson and Robert Redford to sports legends like Michael Jordan and baseball broadcaster Vin Scully, to musicians like Diana Ross and Bruce Springsteen.

Here are just a few of the other highlights from the ceremony today.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

OBAMA: Ellen DeGeneres has a way of making you laugh about some thing rather than at someone, except when I danced on her show. She laughed at me.

It`s easy to forget now when we`ve come so far, where now marriage is equal under the law, just how much courage was required for Ellen to come out on the most public of stages almost 20 years ago. What an incredibly burden that was to bear. And then to have the hopes of millions on your shoulders.

But it`s like Ellen says, we all want a tortilla chip that can support the weight of guacamole, which really makes no sense to me.

We came close to missing out on a Bill and Melinda Gates incredible partnership because apparently Bill`s opening line was, do you want to go out two weeks from this coming Saturday? He`s good with computers, but -- you know. Fortunately, Melinda believes in second chances and the world is better for it.

Here`s how great Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was. 1967: he spent a year dominating college basketball, the NCAA bans the dunk. They didn`t say it was about Kareem, but it was about Kareem. When a sport changes its rules to make it harder just for you, you are really good.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

HAYES: Take a look at this photo for a moment. This is not the filming of a zombie apocalypse movie, this is America this week in North Dakota where in sub-zero temperatures Sunday night police used water cannons and more to disperse protesters.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENITIFIED MALE: Why are you doing this?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: We have no weapons. Why?

UNIDENITIFIED MALE: Bonfire. Come on. Come on!

(END VIDEO CLIP)

HAYES: Protests have been led for months by the Standing Rock Sioux tribe saying the planned Dakota Access Pipeline will desecrate their sacred burial sites and could contaminate their water source. They call themselves water protectors.

Last year, the Army Corps of Engineers dealt a blow to the company building the pipeline says construction cannot continue without input from the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, but they`re still debating whether to grant an easement. Which brings us to last night.

Clashes began with police after protesters tried to remove a road block on a bridge into the camp, which demonstrators say is cutting off emergency access. Police then fired rubber bullets and tear gas.

Then, with temperatures dipping as low as 23 degrees began soaking activists with water cannons. The local sheriffs department said the water cannons were for crowd control and to put out fires, fires protesters said they lit to keep warm.

One police officer was hurt by a rock apparently thrown by activists, while organizers say more than 200 protesters were transported for injuries, most treated for hypothermia.

A 21-year-old demonstrator, Sophia Wolenski (ph), who traveled from New York to support the tribe, was severely injured. Her father told The Guardian she may lose her arm which was hit by a projectile believed to be a concussion grenade.

On Monday, the tribal chairman wrote a letter to the White House calling President Obama to intervene. Given who was just elected president, keep this in mind, we are very likely ending a period where the United States federal government will offer solace to environmental demonstrators or those warning of the effects of climate change or move on that in any legislative fashion.

So, increasingly, it`s going to be protesters like these who are risking their bodies who are on the front line of the battle to save us from the very worst version of our future.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

HAYES: Between Donald Trump`s endorsements from neo-Nazis, the anti- semitic bile spewed by some of his supporters on Twitter and the occasional dog whistles from his own campaign, it`s been tempting for many at times to look to 1930s Europe for a parallel to our current political moment.

But we don`t have to go back so far in time. In both his rhetoric on the campaign trail and his actions thus far as president-elect, Trump has been, according to many scholars who study, authoritarian styles of leadership following the model of present-day autocrats like Erdogan in Turkey or Putin in Russia.

In fact, he has been quite open about his admiration for Putin`s leadership style.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: He is really very much of a leader. I mean, you can, oh, isn`t that a terrible thing? The man has very strong control over a country.

Now it`s a very different system and I don`t happen to like the system, but certainly in that system he`s been a leader far more than our president has been a leader.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

HAYES: In just two weeks since the election, Trump has already adopted some of Putin`s modus operandi shutting out the independent press, vilifying dissenters, possibly even using his power to line his own pockets, though we still don`t know.

We`re now entering uncharted territory for this country. My next guess has been here before.

I`m joined now by Russian journalist Masha Gessen, author of "The Man Without a Face: the Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin" which is an incredible book. And of a recent piece for the New York Review of Books, autocracy rules for survival.

It`s great to have you here, Masha.

MASHA GESSEN, JOURNALIST: Good to be here.

HAYES: OK, let`s start with this. I mean, I guess to people that are watching and being like you sound nuts or paranoid, you`re comparing this person who is a democratically elected president of the United States to an autocrat like Vladimir Putin, like you study American politics. You write about it. You`ve written the book on Putin. Like, what do you say to someone that says that to you?

GESSEN: Well, first of all, I`m used to being accused of being nuts. And I think it is better to be preemptively hysterical than sorry afterward. So I would love to be wrong. I don`t think I am because the similarities are so striking not just to Putin but to a number of autocrats who have come to power in recent years, but also to the autocrats in the20th Century.

And it`s not just Erdogan, it`s what`s happened in Poland in the last year, it`s what`s happened in Hungary over the last decade. We`ve seen countries that exist in the context of the European Union, which has very strong institutions, devolve into undemocratic countries.

HAYES: So you had these rules -- and I want to sort of go through them, a few of them. One is -- I think this is a really important one: believe the autocrat. And this becomes very difficult. I mean, when you are talking in the context of Donald Trump it`s like he says things, and then walks them back and then he shades them and then says something else, and then says I`m just kidding and it`s hard to get your way to like what is he saying?

GESSEN: You know, he does seem to have certain lanes, you know, wide lanes on his highway of thinking from which he doesn`t veer -- his distaste for immigrants is consistent, his racism is consistent. It was consistent before his campaign, it was consistent when he was a real estate mogul in New York.

So there`s no reason to think that that`s suddenly going to change. His idea of what leadership is has been very consistent. He can go back and forth on specifics. I will jail Hillary Clinton, I won`t jail Hillary Clinton, but his idea is that the president is the person who runs everything in the country.

HAYES: I mean, this is someone who, you know, in Tiananmen Square said that it was a mistake for the army to back down in the face of protesters, that, you know, you`ve got to -- basically rule with an iron fist.

GESSEN; He has a very primitive understanding of sort of how things are decided and they`re usually decided by force.

HAYES: You also say this thing about these small signs of normality, because yo know where everyone`s watching this saying we`ve never elected someone who has no public service experience., never elected someone like Donald Trump to be president, ever, in the history of the republic. Everyone sort of how is this all going to work. And I think there`s a sense of, oh, maybe Mitt Romney will be secretary of state, like that`s normal.

You`re looking for these small signs of normality. What do you mean by that?

GESSEN: So first of all, Mitt Romney would be better than the alternative, right. But I think that there`s a real temptation, a real desire to sort of say, OK, well, I`m still here. The world didn`t end. The world hasn`t ended yet until it ends, right, it`s not going to end. And the sun will come up tomorrow.

I mean, I think humans are sort of created -- we have evolved to adapt. We want to be able to live in whatever circumstances we`re given.

HAYES: And yet the danger of that from sort of the context of, say, Putin or even in Hungary which is a great example under Viktor Orban, that slowly these norms degrade, institutions degrade and democracy can become more illiberal, more dissenters ending up with judiciary trials before judges and things like that.

GESSEN: And we accept little things. We adapt to little things. I mean, look at the meeting with the media executives last night. It was actually a perfect example. Because what do you do with that? I mean, it`s unprecedented to have this sort of off the record meeting to not have people to learn anything about it. I mean, the natural thing to do for reporters is to try to get as much information as possible and to start writing about it.

On the other hand, there are some reporters -- you know, the New York Post had this amazing glossy laudatory report that seems to have come directly from Trump`s mouth. That`s another way of approaching it.

But everybody is looking for a way to adapt, and nobody has sort of said this is not normal. We`re not even going to write about this because this is insane!

HAYES: This gets to me the key thing. This is a question of institutions. I mean, institutions will not save you. We have seen institutions in Russia be defiled. We`ve seen institutions in Turkey be defiled. I think there`s an America sense that our institutions are very strong. They`re very strong. We`re not Russia. We`re not Turkey. We`re not Venezuela. We`re not all these places. Our institutions are powerful enough to withstand whatever might happen.

GESSEN: I think there`s truth to it. I think there are also -- we also have to be really aware of the vulnerabilities of American institutions. American institutions are often antiquated. I mean, look at the electoral college, perfect example. American institutions run on norms much more than they run on law or the constitution, for example. Not only is Donald Trump has started shutting out the media, he hasn`t had a press conference, what, since July?

HAYES: Yes.

GESSEN: He`s going from Vladimir Putin`s general record. Vladimir Putin holds one press conference a year. That could happen.

HAYES: Right. There`s no law saying he has to.

GESSEN: We might stop having White House briefings.

HAYES: Masha Gessen, it`s always wonderful to have you here. It`s great to have you here in person.

GESSEN: It`s great to be here.

HAYES: That is ALL IN for this evening. "THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW" starts right now with Joy Reid in for Rachel.

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED. END