IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

The Supreme Court’s conservative justices have no idea how pregnancy works

In oral arguments, multiple justices who seem primed to gut abortion protections displayed a stunning lack of awareness regarding the reality of pregnancy and abortion.
What Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett don’t seem to understand is that pregnancy should never be forced.
What Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett don’t seem to understand is that pregnancy should never be forced. MSNBC / Getty Images

During Wednesday’s oral arguments over Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority appeared shockingly ignorant of the way abortions and, equally important, pregnancy actually work.

It was a grim look into the cruel, anti-scientific stances held by many anti-abortion-rights conservatives.

Chief Justice John Roberts, viewed as something of a moderate, nevertheless signaled a willingness to uphold the Mississippi law’s ban, which defies the fetal viability precedent established in Roe v. Wade and upheld in 1992’s Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. Under Casey, a woman is allowed abortion access without "undue burden" until around 24 weeks of pregnancy.

The chief justice, who has never been pregnant, claimed Mississippi’s 15-week limit is “not a dramatic departure from viability.”

“If it really is an issue about choice,” he asked, “why is 15 weeks not enough time?” 

In fact, there are all sorts of reasons someone may want or need an abortion after 15 weeks, many of them health and safety related. Here’s a piece — for him and you — about one couple’s exceedingly difficult decision to undergo a late-term abortion. 

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, meanwhile, questioned whether “safe haven laws,” which allow pregnant people to waive their parental rights after giving birth, are an effective solution for “forced” pregnancies.  

Abortion-rights advocates “focus on the ways in which forced parenting, forced motherhood, would hinder women’s access to the workplace and to equal opportunities,” she said. “Why don’t the safe haven laws take care of that problem?”

Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggested the court should remain “neutral” on the issue of abortion, which he apparently interpreted as meaning states should be allowed to ban the procedure as they please.

What Roberts, Kavanaugh and Barrett don’t seem to understand, however, is that pregnancy should never be forced. It’s a daunting — even dangerous — process in the United States, especially for women of color. Among so-called developed countries, the United States has the worst maternal mortality rate, according to data from The Commonwealth Fund, a philanthropic group focused on health care equity. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has repeatedly found “wide” racial and ethnic gaps in the maternal mortality rates among white and nonwhite women.  

Barrett's and Roberts' suggestions that an unwanted pregnancy can occur without burden ignores reality. Kavanaugh’s suggestion that the Supreme Court can remain “neutral” as it guts bodily autonomy for pregnant people is equally foolish. 

Subject to the whim of this openly ignorant conservative majority, abortion rights as we’ve known them could well become a thing of the past.