IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

An odd definition of 'failure'

Lately, it seems Republicans call the ACA a "failure" more out of habit than sincerity. Take Chris Christie, for example.
Obamacare supporters react to the U.S. Supreme Court decision to uphold President Obama's health care law, on June 28, 2012 in Washington, D.C.
Obamacare supporters react to the U.S. Supreme Court decision to uphold President Obama's health care law, on June 28, 2012 in Washington, D.C.
By Steve Benen
 
The drop in the number of uninsured Americans is terrific. There's been an "amazing" decline in Medicare's price tag, thanks in part to ACA reforms. Consumers are paying their premiums and insurers are clamoring to participate. Every Republican prediction about the success of the system has failed to come true.
 
Indeed, just this morning, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reported that the ACA itself will cost even less than previously believed.
 
And it's against this backdrop that some dead-enders can't let go of their old talking points.

In what could be the latest move toward a 2016 presidential bid, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) offered a wide-ranging critique of President Obama's domestic and foreign policies. Speaking to reporters at the National Governors Association on Saturday, Christie labeled Obamacare, the administration's signature legislation, a "failure on a whole number of levels" and said it should be repealed.

Lately, it seems Republicans call the ACA a "failure" more out of habit than sincerity. Christie, for example, didn't back up his rhetoric with anything specific, perhaps hoping people would just take his criticism at face value.
 
But there's an obvious follow-up question: what exactly does Chris Christie think "failure" means? Because it doesn't seem to apply at all to the Affordable Care Act.
 
Paul Krugman today notes the larger phenomenon.

You might ask why, if health reform is going so well, it continues to poll badly. It's crucial, I'd argue, to realize that Obamacare, by design, by and large doesn't affect Americans who already have good insurance. As a result, many peoples' views are shaped by the mainly negative coverage in the news media. Still, the latest tracking survey from the Kaiser Family Foundation shows that a rising number of Americans are hearing about reform from family and friends, which means that they're starting to hear from the program's beneficiaries. And as I suggested earlier, people in the media -- especially elite pundits -- may be the last to hear the good news, simply because they're in a socioeconomic bracket in which people generally have good coverage. For the less fortunate, however, the Affordable Care Act has already made a big positive difference. The usual suspects will keep crying failure, but the truth is that health reform is -- gasp! -- working.

Someone might want to let Chris Christie know; he seems to be a little behind on the news.