IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Clinton vs. Cheney

In a dispute between the former Democratic president and the former Republican vice president, the smart money is on Clinton.
Bill Clinton delivers the inaugural William J. Clinton Leadership Lecture in Belfast, Mar. 5, 2014.
Bill Clinton delivers the inaugural William J. Clinton Leadership Lecture in Belfast, Mar. 5, 2014.
No doubt trying to salvage his abysmal reputation, failed former Vice President Dick Cheney has maintained a near-ubiquitous media presence lately, condemning the Obama administration's foreign policy and coming awfully close to accusing President Obama of treason.
 
Former President Bill Clinton is apparently a little tired of it, telling NBC News' David Gregory this week that Cheney's condemnations amounted to "attacking the administration for not doing an adequate job of cleaning up the mess that he made."

"I believe if they hadn't gone to war in Iraq, none of this would be happening," the former president told David Gregory in the interview, which will air Sunday on "Meet the Press." He continued: "Mr. Cheney has been incredibly adroit for the last six years or so attacking the administration for not doing an adequate job of cleaning up the mess that he made. I think it's unseemly."

Apparently, the former V.P. wants to keep this going.

After Clinton knocked Cheney for attacking the Obama administration, Cheney threw one back at the former President on Wednesday night. "If there's somebody who knows something about unseemly, it's Bill Clinton," Cheney told the crowd at the Energy Expo trade show in Billings, Mont.

I don't know if (or how) the former president will respond to what seems like a cheap shot, but if there's a prolonged dispute between Clinton and Cheney, I like the Big Dog's chances.
 
Laura Ingraham made a compelling case last night, for example, that it's not in Republicans' interest to re-litigate Cheney's invasion of Iraq, which the American mainstream long ago turned against in large numbers.

[A]ccording to Ingraham, the war's merits have been trumped by poll numbers. The people have spoken, and it would behoove Republicans to listen. "The problem is when you go to the public on this, Bill, if we think this is somehow going to help the Republican Party in 2014 or 2016 to be re-litigating Iraq on a daily or weekly basis, I don't think that's a winner," she told O'Reilly. "The idea that you're going to kind of one-up Clinton on this, I don't think that that's ultimately -- as a political matter, that's different than a foreign policy matter -- it's gonna work," Ingraham added.

I think that's correct -- the polling on public attitudes towards the war is one-sided -- but I'd go just one step further.
 
Even putting aside questions about foreign policies and the public's war weariness, Bill Clinton vs. Dick Cheney is the kind of match-up that Democrats welcome.
 
Love him or hate him, the former Democratic president is enormously popular. A recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found Clinton is easily the most admired president of the last quarter century. Whatever one might think of his presidency, Clinton is one of the most well liked figures on the planet.
 
Dick Cheney is ... Dick Cheney. The man's name is synonymous with violence and failure. Outside of far-right circles, Cheney enjoys little credibility, even less respect, and is more often seen as a punch-line to a painful joke.
 
The more these two go at it, the worse it is for Republicans.