Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas), chairman of the House Homeland Security committee, argued yesterday that "some" of the unattended minors from Central America he saw "looked more like a threat to coming into the United States." How could he tell? McCaul didn't say
Soon after, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) argued in support of sending the National Guard to the border. Asked what good Guard troops could under the circumstances, Perry couldn't say
. (In fact, he seemed confused by the question.)
A variety of congressional Republicans have now balked
at President Obama's appeal for emergency resource, insisting the package costs "too much." What's the GOP's alternative response? What's the proper amount of spending? They wouldn't say
Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, is among many far-right lawmakers condemning the White House for not deporting Dream Act kids. Why are Republicans focusing so heavily on a policy unrelated to the humanitarian crisis at the border? They haven't said
To be sure, this is an incredibly difficult crisis to resolve. Anyone who suggests there's an easy, quick fix to this is kidding themselves. But as is too often the case, congressional Republicans -- folks who were elected to help shape federal law -- appear to be sitting out the substantive debate altogether. GOP lawmakers have decided what's really needed right now is incessant complaining -- and little else. Danny Vinik added
If Republicans object to this request, what exactly do they propose instead? How should we move through the huge backload of cases? Where should we hold the unaccompanied minors in the meantime? And how should we pay to transport them to their home countries?
It's not that Republicans have poor responses to these questions; it's that they're not even trying to answer them.
The post-policy GOP knows what it doesn't like -- the president and his policies -- but seems to have forgotten that a governing party, or at least a party that maintains the pretense that governing matters, cannot simply boo from the sidelines.
In some cases, they're hardly making any effort at all. For example, Goodlatte late last week published an item
for Breitbart, with some specific recommendations.
Send the strong, public message that those who enter illegally will be returned. President Obama needs to use his bully-pulpit to send the clear message that those who are seeking to enter the U.S. illegally will be returned to their home countries and that subjecting children to the perilous trek northward to our southern border will no longer be tolerated.
This sounds like sensible advice, right up until one realizes that the president has already done this
, and asked for resources from Congress for an advertising campaign in countries like Honduras and El Salvador to reach an even larger Central American audience. Putting aside the question of why the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee is writing pieces for Breitbart, why doesn't Goodlatte know that Obama's already done what he's asking the president to do?
It's easy to get the impression that congressional Republicans' policymaking muscle has atrophied after a prolonged lack of use. GOP lawmakers have failed to work on public policy for so long, doing so little substantive work in recent memory, that they seem wholly unprepared to act with any sense of purpose now.
Their complain-first instinct obviously remains intact, but a challenge this complex will need more than whining politicians. There's real work to be done -- the sooner the better -- and it's well past time for congressional Republicans to pick up their game. They're outraged by the crisis at the border? Good. Now they can get to work doing something about it.