A politician’s brain is a black box: We are rarely afforded an opportunity to know what they privately believe as they navigate the party line.
But new reporting, and the ongoing release of audio recordings of Republican congressional leaders expressing private anxiety and anger about former President Donald Trump in the aftermath of the Jan. 6 riot, has gifted us with one of those rare opportunities to observe the difference between what’s felt and what’s said. It hasn’t been pretty. An ever-clearer picture of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s rank opportunism and naked ambition is emerging with every detail, underscoring how Trumpism has been shielded by Republican politicians fearful of losing their chance to become even more powerful.
The first piece of reporting from The New York Times, published Thursday, revealed that McCarthy, R-Calif., was not only fed up with the then-president, but thought Trump should voluntarily resign. Audio recordings obtained by the Times captured McCarthy telling Republican leaders in the days after Jan. 6, “I’ve had it with this guy”; contemplating the possibility of using the 25th Amendment to remove Trump; and suggesting he would tell Trump, whose actions he called “atrocious and totally wrong,” that he should resign in light of the imminent passage of an impeachment resolution in the House.
But as my colleague Hayes Brown has noted, when it came to his public behavior, McCarthy’s criticism of Trump was far more modest. He also visited Mar-a-Lago and was happy to be photographed next to the seditious president. More significantly, he voted against impeachment, and he eventually worked to kick Trump critic Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., out of Republican House leadership. McCarthy has called the Times’ reporting “false and wrong,” but it’s gotten a bit of attention within his conference, with some Republican lawmakers signaling that McCarthy is not to be trusted due to his apparent disloyalty.
Then The New York Times published another report, on Tuesday, again with an audio recording of McCarthy, capturing him confessing to other congressional Republicans that he was worried about pro-Jan. 6 rhetoric and call-outs of lawmakers within his party endangering the safety of his colleagues.
“He’s putting people in jeopardy,” McCarthy said of Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., who was appearing on television after Jan. 6 as a pro-Trump attack dog and criticizing Cheney. “And he doesn’t need to be doing this. We saw what people would do in the Capitol, you know, and these people came prepared with rope, with everything else.”
At another point, McCarthy seemed to entertain the idea that his own political gains were less important than the lives of lawmakers. “The country is too crazy,” McCarthy said. “I do not want to look back and think we caused something or we missed something and someone got hurt. I don’t want to play politics with any of that.”
But as we now know, McCarthy was indeed more than willing to play politics with the lives of his own colleagues, as well as with the life of American democracy. He didn't take meaningful steps to put a stop to it, but he did target a Trump critic within his party.
Is the new reporting surprising? Not particularly. But it still does shock. It’s highly unusual to hear a politician explicitly weigh how their party or policy preference might cause harm and admit that what might make for good politics could hurt the public in unacceptable ways. And it’s jarring to know that a person who demonstrated he clearly knew better — who demonstrated a conscience and an ability to reason about the common good — still went ahead with what was politically expedient. This was not in service of any broader project other than remaining in leadership and staying out of a departing president's crosshairs.
I tend to find depictions of politicians as uniformly soulless, power-hungry megalomaniacs in shows such as Netflix’s “House of Cards” cartoonish and unfair. As much as Washington brims with corruption and people with huge egos, many head there because they have ideas about the world that they believe in and wish to bring to life.
But the Trump era really laid bare the “House of Cards” caucus of the GOP. Seeing one ambitious Republican after another reinvent and contort themselves has been sobering. From Texas Sen. Ted Cruz’s transformation from Trump critic to Trump servant to reporting that former Vice President Mike Pence contemplated not certifying the 2020 election results, many of the Republican Party’s top politicos showed they had no commitment to principled conservatism or any allegiance to democracy.
The new recordings underscore the cynicism that underpins so much of the GOP's leadership. What makes it worse is that they raise the possibility that these people could choose differently, but they aren't willing to put anything before their immediate self-interest — and the rest of us have to pay the price.