IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Anti-warriors are citizens without a party

COMMENTARYAmericans overwhelmingly oppose the continued war in Afghanistan.
Ted Rall
by Ted Rall


Americans overwhelmingly oppose the continued war in Afghanistan. Even many veterans say the war in Iraq was a mistake and about half felt the same about Afghanistan.

Antiwar sentiment is the majority opinion when it comes to the prospect of future conflicts. Of the two countries the U.S. is currently most likely to attack militarily, nearly seven out of 10 are against invading Syria.

Not only are most Americans against wars present and future, we favor cutting defense spending in general.  According to a National Journal poll, 60% want to cut the Pentagon budget. 

Eleven years after America lost the Twin Towers and then its collective mind something remarkable has happened. We've come to our senses.

We're a nation of pacifists.

So how is a pacifist—in other words, an average American—supposed to vote this fall? Obviously not Republican: Romney says he'll cut every department except defense. He wants to spend more on weapons and has critiqued the president on withdrawing from Iraq and Afghanistan.

But with all the veteran and war messaging that went on at last week's Democratic National Convention, Democrats look like a mirror image of the GOP: jingoistic, militaristic, and gung-ho for war. Between pogo-dancing on Osama bin Laden's corpse, the airing of a mawkish "Honoring the Sacred Trust with Our Veterans" video that spread the debunked right-wing myth that returning Vietnam vets got disrespected, the First Lady donning a Dubya-inspired "support our troops" T-shirt, and Democrats' petty attack on Mitt Romney for omitting to name-check vets in his nomination acceptance address, it felt like the 2002-03 build-up to the invasion of Iraq.

It's official: the Dems are a war party.


Why the new bellicose tone? In part it's an attempt to counter the old canard that Democrats are weak on defense, a charge that Republicans used to their electoral advantage throughout the Cold War. So why not turn your biggest weakness into your strongest strength. (The Machiavellian Karl Rove, who attacked John Kerry's war record of all things, put it the other way around: turn their biggest strength into their biggest weakness.) It's also a reflection of the triumph of Democratic Leadership Council-inspired conservatives, who have cowed, purged and marginalized liberals and pacifists from the party.

Militarism may be unpopular, but it still rules the ruling class. The military-industrial complex enjoys more direct political and economic influence among government officials than ever. The post-9/11 Cult of the Noble Soldier, coupled with the myth of a beleaguered United States defending the world from barbarians in an epic clash of civilizations, merely recasts old-fashioned fascist militarism—and it's just as effective at confusing leftie opponents and putting them off-balance.

Truth be told, the Democrats' new hawkish tone is catching up with their party's hawkish history. Former President Ronald Reagan gets credit for the defense build-up of the 1980s that supposedly bankrupted the Soviet Union, but it was Jimmy Carter who started it in 1978. No one remembers now, but "wimpy" Carter also gave us draft registration (in response to the Russian invasion of Afghanistan). Mr. Habitat for Humanity sent arms to the Afghan mujahedeen and provoked the Iran hostage crisis by admitting the recently deposed Shah to the U.S. Bill Clinton launched a war of choice in Serbia and waged an aerial bombing campaign against Iraq.

President Obama’s expanded program of drone bombings can attest to his credentials as a happy warrior. "Barack Obama," Aaron David Miller, Middle East policy adviser to Republican and Democratic administrations, wrote recently, "has become George W. Bush on steroids."

Democrats have always been pro-war. So they might as well shout it from the rooftops.

Most Americans are against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the cult of militarism, and the untouchable status of Pentagon spending on weapons. Yet, there is no political home for people who oppose our current wars, or war in general. 

Where is a pacifist to go? 

Ted Rall is a columnist, cartoonist, author and independent war journalist. He is the winner of numerous awards and a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize. His new book is The Book of Obama: How We Got From Hope and Change to the Age of Revolt.