IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.
  • Steele to 1/6 committee: ‘Enforce the damn subpoenas’

    12:41
  • Louisiana nixes plan to classify abortion as homicide

    09:08
  • Ukraine begins first war crimes trial of Russian soldier

    07:37
  •  Mary Trump on her plan to combat the ‘MAGA Party’

    10:19
  • Should Biden declare natl. emergency to expand abortion access?

    09:44
  • Patients experiencing miscarriages denied necessary medication

    07:34
  • How will reproductive rights change the midterms?

    09:30
  • Is expanding SCOTUS a realistic possibility?

    09:05
  • Oath Keeper says founder tried to call Trump on 1/6

    08:43
  • Now Playing

    “Literally true, but incredibly misleading” answers from justices on Roe

    09:17
  • UP NEXT

    Tracking menstrual cycles to identify ‘misconduct’

    08:41
  • What would a post-Roe Alabama look like?

    08:19
  • George Conway weighs in on Jan. 6 public hearings

    13:38
  • Ohio State Rep. sees pregnancy after rape as an ‘opportunity’

    09:10
  • Trump-backed election deniers running for state office

    08:01
  • Why is the DOJ declining to act on Trump?

    13:45
  • “Stupid” and “a bribe”: The GOP freakout over student loans

    12:39
  • Kara Swisher on Musk’s “virtue signaling” to conservatives

    11:47
  • FL Democrats fight DeSantis congressional map

    09:25
  • McCarthy said he’d urge Trump to resign after 1/6

    11:08

“Literally true, but incredibly misleading” answers from justices on Roe

09:17

During each confirmation hearing of the current conservative Supreme Court Justices, they all claimed they would respect precedent. Former U.S. Attorney Barb McQuade joins Katie Phang to discuss how misleading those answers were in light of the leaked majority draft opinion on Roe v. Wade.