Qualified immunity is one of those things that, if altered or removed, could fundamentally change policing. Qualified immunity protects law enforcement officers as well as state and local officials from frivolous litigation unless the accused violated a clearly established constitutional right. And establishing that violation is not easy, especially if there is no prior pattern of such behavior - so over the years, qualified immunity has become a kind of “shield” in thousands of lawsuits seeking to hold police officers accountable when accused of using excessive force. Proponents of qualified immunity say it’s essential because police need latitude to make split-second decisions in scenarios that could put lives, including their own, at risk. Opponents described qualified immunity as a, “shoot first, think later” approach to policing.May 1, 2021
UP NEXT
Aaron David Miller: ‘Tougher times are coming in the US-Israeli relationship’
08:14
AIPAC was among the top 20 spenders in the 2022 elections. Here’s how it breaks down.
05:55
Supreme Court’s SEC case ruling could ‘upend government as we know it’
09:54
‘We dream for that’: Fmr. NY Consul General for Israel on strong future Palestinian leader
14:38
Trump’s trial dates and primary schedule could put country in ‘unchartered territory’
08:36
Velshi: Nikki Haley is winning ‘the race for second place’
