Republicans excuse Trump behavior. TRANSCRIPT: 7/17/19, The Last Word w/ Lawrence O’Donnell.

Leonard Pitts, Eric Swalwell, Tony Schwartz, Tony Schwartz; George Will

LAWRENCE O`DONNELL, MSNBC HOST:  Good evening, Rachel.


And Christianity is much more clear about how to welcome refugees than the

American government certainly is. 


RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST:  Yes.  To have the Jewish protesters with Never

Again is now and to have the Catholic protesters tomorrow, I mean, this is

– when it gets to this kind of treatment and the defense of this kind of

treatment, I think you are tapping something that`s primal in people.  So,

it will be interesting to see –


O`DONNELL:  And the treatment coming from the party that claims, that

always publicly claims the strongest embrace of religion, that wants to

define itself by the strong embrace of religion, and everything they are

doing in this direction violates all of that. 


MADDOW:  Yes, the president putting out his new reelection positioning

stuff that it`s under God. 


O`DONNELL:  Uh-huh.


MADDOW:  The Trump administration is under God.  Well, that`s what they`re

doing.  It`s amazing stuff.


O`DONNELL:  Thank you, Rachel. 


MADDOW:  Thanks, Lawrence.


O`DONNELL:  Remember Rush Limbaugh?  He was the Donald Trump of American

politics before Donald Trump became Donald Trump of American politicians. 

But the right wing reactionary Republican politics doesn`t need two Donald

Trumps, not enough room for two Donald Trumps.  So, no one really cares

what Rush Limbaugh says anymore.  Apparently, not even Rush Limbaugh. 


And the latest crazy thing that Rush Limbaugh says nowadays never makes it

into the American news media because it`s not as crazy as what the

president of the United States says every day, including what the president

said tonight.  Rush Limbaugh had to give up many of his beliefs in order to

become the faithful Trump follower that he is, and now, Rush Limbaugh has

confessed, he`s actually publicly confessed that they were never beliefs at

all.  He didn`t believe all that stuff he was saying, stuff that he and

other Republicans were lying about what they believed. 


He actually said that on his radio show.  And at the end of this hour,

Pulitzer Prize winning columnist George Will will join us about what Donald

Trump has done not just to the Republican Party, but to our politics and

whether the damage can be repaired. 


George Will quit the Republican Party when Donald Trump won the

presidential nomination, and this week, he said that the damage the

presidency of Donald Trump has done could be worse than the damage the

presidency of Richard Nixon did before Richard Nixon was forced to resign

the presidency.  George Will said, I think this will do more lasting damage

than Richard Nixon`s surreptitious burglaries did.  That damage George Will

is talking about is damage that he said this president has done to our

culture, to our civic discourse. 


And the president did more of that kind of damage tonight at a campaign

rally in North Carolina.  He began the rally by telling the only truth that

he told tonight. 





going to have a lot of fun.  I have nothing to do.  Nothing. 




O`DONNELL:  That is absolutely true.  He is our first president with

nothing to do because he has no idea what the president is supposed to do

and he is famously lazy. 


Many of us said when Donald Trump was running for president, he didn`t know

anything about government, and now, former Republican House Speaker Paul

Ryan has said it in the new book, “American Carnage”.  Paul Ryan said: I`m

telling you, he didn`t know anything about government. 


Covering a Trump campaign rally presents challenges to the American news

media because we know that the president is going to lie, that probably

most of what he will say will be a lie.  And we don`t want to be the

propaganda delivery system for his lies, but he is the president of the

United States and for all 44 of his predecessors, there has been a general

agreement that what the president says is important.  Now, there is no

general societal agreement about how to deal with what this president says. 


But we do have some new agreements tonight in new polling about what the

president has been saying recently about four members of Congress who he

has been attacking and who he attacked again tonight at his campaign rally. 

A new “USA Today” poll shows that 68 percent of Americans say that the

president`s attacks on those four women members of Congress are offensive. 

Fifty-nine percent of Americans say that they are un-American, 65 percent

of Americans say telling four women of color to go back where they came

from is a racist statement. 


The president struggled with the names of the congresswomen he was

attacking tonight.  He admitted to being unable to say Alexandria Ocasio-

Cortez`s full name because it`s just too long.  He lied about all of the

women, lied about them relentlessly tonight, claiming that they said things

they have not. 


In other words, it was a standard Donald Trump performance, the kind of

thing you have seen many times, filled with hatred and lies.  As with all

such Trump performances, the most disturbing part of what happens at a

Trump rally belongs to the Trump audience.  It`s what the Trump audience

does and says. 


That Donald Trump is going to disgrace himself and the presidency at his

campaign rallies is to be expected.  He has always done that.  And sadly is

just as likely that the Trump audience will disgrace themselves, as they

did so fully tonight when they started chanting “send her back”, when

Donald Trump was telling them lies about Congresswoman Ilhan Omar. 


A new poll indicates that Donald Trump`s support among Republicans has

actually increased five points since he started attacking the four freshmen

congresswomen with attacks that 68 percent of Americans say are offensive,

attacks that 59 percent of Americans say are un-American, attacks that 65

percent of Americans say are racist, 65 percent of Americans say Donald

Trump`s attacks on these four congresswomen are racist and those racist

attacks increased support for Donald Trump among Republican voters.  And

now they are chanting “send her back.”


Decorated combat hero and former secretary of state, John Kerry, who served

in a war that Donald Trump avoided by getting a note from his doctor wrote

this today about Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley who Donald Trump attacked

again today.  Ayanna Pressley served on John Kerry`s Senate staff before he

became secretary of state. 


Of course, President Trump`s comments about Representative Ayanna Pressley

are racist, but even more revolting is his defense, pretending that he is

not attacking her race, but rather her lack of patriotism.  Pressley`s

entire life has been a story of patriotism, loving her country so much that

she wanted to help America live up to its ideals. 


A strong woman raised in public housing by a fearless mother who sacrificed

to keep her safe.  An activist who found in Boston a life of public service

and a determination to speak up for people who were underrepresented.  That

story identifies as more American than any mantle this president could ever

claim.  No wonder Donald Trump is afraid of her. 


Leading off our discussion tonight are Leonard Pitts, Jr., Pulitzer Prize-

winning columnist for the “Miami Herald.”  His latest piece is entitled

“This Land is Our Land, Donald Trump.”  Also joining us, Yamiche Alcindor,

White House correspondent from the “PBS NewsHour” and an MSNBC political

analyst, and Democratic Congressman Eric Swalwell of California, he is a

member of the Judiciary Committee and the Intelligence Committees. 


And, Congressman Swalwell, let me start with you and what we saw on the

House floor yesterday, you gave one of the most powerful statements on the

floor yesterday before that vote to condemn what President Trump has been

saying about your colleagues.  I want to get your reaction to what he

continued to say and said tonight.


REP. ERIC SWALWELL (D-CA):  Good evening, Lawrence.  You know, the trope

send them back actually is one that our own government tells its employers

across the federal agency, that is something you cannot say to an employee

because it is racist.  So, that is something that our own government



Second, we`re going to send Donald Trump back.  We`re going to send him

back to New York, whether it`s through impeachment or election.  He is

going to face swift, I predict, indictment and probably bankruptcy. 


The question I have been asked the most across the country particularly

when I was running for president is, when will Republicans step up and do

the right thing?  And, Lawrence, as someone who serves with so many of

these individuals, I can tell you, they are not. 


Donald Trump started this riot.  Mitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy and

gang are the looters and they are going to take everything.  Tax cuts for

the wealthy and a woman`s right to choose.  A worker`s right to organize

until there is nothing left to take.  And they`re going to stand up to him. 

We just have to beat them. 


O`DONNELL:  Leonard Pitts, I want to get your reaction to the Trump crowd. 

We all know the Donald Trump show, the Donald Trump performance.  We have

seen that before.  There is always another performance that`s going on in

that hall at that event at that rally, and that is the audience`s

performance.  That`s the Trump supporter`s performance. 


And tonight, their choice was to chant “send her back.”  We may be hearing

a lot of that kind of thing from these Trump crowds. 


LEONARD PITTS, JR., COLUMNIST, MIAMI HERALD:  I don`t know that we have

ever stopped hearing those things from the Trump crowds.  And, frankly, I

find it hard to look on what they said with a whole lot of surprise.  It`s

consistent with the behavior of Trump`s crowds at his rallies over the

years since he first became, you know, a candidate for president and then

president of the United States. 


These seem to be people who value their fear of this coming tide of

progressive black and brown people that is rising change in American

demographic.  That`s more important to them that they combat it than health

care, than diplomatic issues, than essentially anything that you can think

of that you can judge a presidency.  They are more concerned with

protecting whiteness than they are with protecting America.  All you saw

tonight was more of that. 


O`DONNELL:  Leonard, you made a point in your column where I found so

striking about what Donald Trump doesn`t understand about America and the

populations of the people it includes.  He seems to think that Americans

are only the people who look like members of his family. 


And you took this picture of America all the way up to Alaska to include

some of the people up there who Donald Trump would never recognize as



PITTS:  Well, this whole idea of send them back, this is something we never

discussed.  But this whole idea of send them back is something that you can

only say if you – if we presuppose and we agree that you own the place. 


I`m in your studio.  If I say something that is displeasing and you have

the right to say, Leonard, you know, you`ve got to go, leave.  But if we

are in Walmart together, you know, Walmart is a public space.  You don`t

have the right to excise me from there. 


And what you see and hear in Donald Trump and frankly all the people that

Donald Trump is echoing is this presumption that has a white person, I have

the right to judge your fitness and your right to be here in the United

States of America.  So, we can argue with and should argue with and should

decry the sentiment, but we should also note and decry the presumption that

underlies the sentiment.  You have no right to tell you where to go, where

I can be.  I`m as American as anyone else in this country. 


O`DONNELL:  And, Yamiche, four years ago, it was “lock her up”.  Now it`s

“send her back”. 


And Ilhan Omar, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar tweeted tonight, you may shoot me

with your words.  You may cut me with your eye eyes.  You may kill me with

your hatefulness, but still like air, I rise.  She was, of course, quoting

Maya Angelou. 


We have a long presidential campaign ahead of us.  Who knows what comes

after “send her back”. 


YAMICHE ALCINDOR, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST:  I think what we saw tonight was

the crystallization of President Trump trying to make the four

congresswomen his foes for the 2020 campaign.  The White House has been

trying to make this pivot since Monday when the president said over the

weekend that these four congresswomen need to go back to the countries from

which they came, even though three of the four were born here and all of

them are U.S. citizens.  They`ve been trying to say – what he was trying

to say, really, was that they should leave the country. 


But this crowd in North Carolina is being clear that they heard Donald

Trump when he said over the weekend and has been continuing to say that

these women should go back to where they came from.  So, there is this idea

that I think this crowd is giving us a glimpse into the limits, really the

non-limits that Trump supporters will go to follow this person that they

now see as the person who`s going to carry the porch for this new America

for going back to whatever America was years ago to make it great again. 


I think there is an idea that President Trump is very, very comfortable

having arguments about identity, really focusing his entire presidential

campaign on racial politics and on these racist tweets.  And I think that

what we see is the president saying today on the White House lawn, he said,

I think I`m winning this political battle.  So, he feels as though to get

his supporters which are largely white supporters to get them animate and

get them to turn out for the polls, he needs to have a foil in these women. 


Maybe he will face Joe Biden.  Maybe he will face Senator Harris.  Maybe he

will face Senator Sanders.  But what he really wants to do is face the four

women because he found they can animate people better than anything he can

say about policy. 


O`DONNELL:  Congressman Swalwell, I think Yamiche absolutely has that.  I

think we all agree on that, especially when you have the top polling

candidates for president all now polling ahead of Donald Trump, all beating

him on one on one polling.  You are recently retired from the presidential

campaign, back to your full time job in the House. 


But, look, I said to our staff tonight, I want to pull up any piece of the

Donald Trump rally where he actually talks about a policy position of one

of the Democratic presidential candidates in an intelligible way with

English language sentences that can be followed.  There is no such piece in

the Trump rally tonight.  Not one policy issue discussed in any way that

you can make sense of by the president.  But he spent 15 minutes on four

freshmen congresswomen. 


SWALWELL:  Yes.  You know, Lawrence, I think this is going to be very much

like the midterms.  And when we look back on this point in history, we will

find that the hardest thing we did was win the midterms to save the country

and the way we did that was not go in the mud when Donald Trump right

before the midterm elections was talking about immigration and the

caravans.  I call them scare vans.  He want that to be the top issue.


And we told our candidates on the front lines – health care, health care,

health care.  They don`t have a plan for health care.  Their plan is

subtraction.  Our plan is addition. 


We don`t have to deviate too far from that in 2020.  They don`t have a plan

for health care.  So, yes, he is racist, and by the way, he wants to take

your health care. 


O`DONNELL:  Leonard Pitts, this poll coming out saying 65 percent, 65

percent of Americans think what the president said is racist, 65 percent. 

Is that an encouraging poll for you? 


PITTS:  Not really, because – I mean, a lot of times we are willing to say

X, Y, and Z is racist, but the question is what weight does that carry with

you if you`re not an American of color?  What are you willing to do about

that, what are you willing to give up about that?  What are you willing to

say?  What action are you willing to take?


And on that account, I think frankly a lot of us as Americans have been

remiss.  The other number that gets polled out and you discussed it earlier

is that his popularity among his party among Republicans has risen since

those statements came out.  And to me, that`s a more telling number because

what it says is that contrary to all of the talk two years ago that he was

driven by, they were driven by economic anxiety and populism and all the

rest of this stuff, it codifies the fact that what we are seeing is nothing

more than and nothing less than an appeal to white nationalism that is

being soaked up and finding a home in a frighteningly large number of

people – 63 million Americans in the last election voted for this, knowing

what it was.  That`s the number that stops me.  That`s the number that I

think should give us all pause. 


O`DONNELL:  Yamiche, what do you expect from the president`s campaign now

that they see a five-point bump among Republicans in his factorability as a

result of these attacks? 


ALCINDOR:  Well, we can expect the campaign to continue to use these four

women as examples of what they see as what`s wrong with American politics. 

They want to run the campaign and give a face to the Democratic Party.  Joe

Biden possibly being a moderate, possibly being someone who can capture

states like Pennsylvania and maybe Michigan, or someone like Senator

Harris, they are not in some ways radical enough to really make the case. 


So, I think what we are going to see is President Trump and the campaign

continuing to make the case that they understand that American identity is

tied to what the president sees as his way forward.  His way forward is

going to be talking about race in this way, talking about these young

women, these congresswomen, I should say, rather, and attacking them.  And

I think that the president has really settled on the idea that race and

immigration animates people more than policy, and that`s how he won in

2016, and how he wants to win in 2020. 


O`DONNELL:  Yamiche Alcindor, Leonard Pitts, Congressman Eric Swalwell,

thank you all for starting us off. 


SWALWELL:  My pleasure.  Thank you. 


O`DONNELL:  I appreciate it.  Thank you.


And when we come back, are President Trump`s attacks a political strategy

or are they just an impulse?  Is it an impulse he`s had for a long time? 

People who have been close to Donald Trump for a very long time talk about

his reflexive racism.  You will hear more of that when we come back. 







HOTEL & CASINO:  He does have a very long history.  He is a racist through

and through.  He doesn`t have to use the N word for it to be clear what he





O`DONNELL:  That is Jack O`Donnell who is not related to me.  He worked for

Donald Trump as the president of the Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino.  Here`s

more of what Jack O`Donnell has to say about Donald Trump. 




JACK O`DONNELL:  I do believe he`s a racist.  I believe anybody that has

spent substantial amount of time around him in a casual atmosphere, whether

it`s business or dinner or at lunch, I believe it would be difficult that

he wouldn`t express these feelings to them over time.  I just find it very

hard to believe that there are not more people who know him that don`t

believe exactly what I believe, but for one reason or another are not

willing to say it publicly, that he is a racist. 




O`DONNELL:  Joining us now, someone who has spent a substantial amount of

time around Donald Trump, Tony Schwartz, who is the co-author of Donald

Trump`s first best-selling book, “The Art of the Deal”.


Tony, I know you were basically embedded with Donald Trump for quite a long

time, writing that book for him.  You presented it as coauthors, but we

know you wrote it. 


What about what Jack O`Donnell says, anybody who has spent a substantial

amount of time around him, he says, knows he is a racist? 


TONY SCHWARTZ, CO-AUTHOR, “THE ART OF THE DEAL”:  I think the subtler point

is that he is dismissive, disdainful of a wide range of people who are not

white and rich. 


So, Donald Trump doesn`t like black people.  He doesn`t like brown people. 

He doesn`t like women.  He doesn`t like poor people. 


And each – he doesn`t like Jews, except to have them as his lawyers and

accountant accountants.  That`s what he thinks Jews do.


Black people are boxers or football players to him.  Those are the only

ones he pays attention to. 


So, he has roles he has for each of these groups meant to serve his



O`DONNELL:  We just had this book, “American Carnage”, here the other

night, and there is a story about Donald Trump vetting a possible black

nominee for his administration and the way he vetted them was he called up

Don King, the boxing promoter saying what do you think of this guy? 


SCHWARTZ:  Yes.  So, he – you know, we see who his role models are.  He`s

a coward so he is impressed by a boxer who has a certain courage or by

Hershel Walker who was on the big signing he did when he was running at

USFL team.  Those people stand for something that he can admire. 


The idea that they would have brains or hearts or souls, and he doesn`t

know what a soul is, but brains or heart wouldn`t occur to him.  It`s

racist, but it`s also sexist.  


O`DONNELL:  Yes.  And he is generally condescending to everyone, so who is

not a Trump, basically.  So, of course, there`s a part of it. 


Let`s listen to what Michael Cohen said in his testimony to Congress about

this very point. 




MICHAEL COHEN, FORMER TRUMP LAWYER:  Mr. Trump is a racist.  The country

has seen Mr. Trump court white supremacists and bigots.  You have heard him

call poor countries shitholes.  In private, he is even worse. 


He once asked me to name a country run by a black person that wasn`t a

shithole.  This was when Barack Obama was president of the United States. 

And while we were once striving through a struggling neighborhood in

Chicago, he commented that only black people could live that way.  And he

told me that black people would never vote for him because they were too





O`DONNELL:  Tony, the character he is describing sounds like a guy from

Queens of his era who never exposed himself to any enlightenment. 


SCHWARTZ:  Well, right.  The light and Donald Trump are not words that go

in any form.  I think in a way, it`s almost irrelevant, you know, from a

political – I don`t want to say irrelevant, but from a political

perspective, what he`s done is he`s aroused the feelings of the like minded

feelings of racism among, let`s say, as many as 40 percent of Americans. 


The reality is that if all the people, voters, who Donald Trump hates and

disdains were to come out and vote, it`s a landslide. 




SCHWARTZ:  That 40 percent in effect doesn`t matter.  It`s a minority. 

It`s a horrible minority and he has exacerbated their worst instincts, but

it is a minority. 


And what we ought to be focusing on is getting those people who he hates,

particularly brown people because a lot of brown people voted for Trump,

many more than black people or women.  I don`t know about women, but black

people voted for Trump. 


So, it`s about getting the people who don`t agree with him, not about

waving or hands in upset about the fact that his base is his base.  They

are immovable, they always aggrieved as he is, and nothing will change



O`DONNELL:  Tony Schwartz, thank you very much for joining us tonight.  I

really appreciate it. 


And when we come back, President Trump says he`s not a fan of Jeffrey

Epstein, but he sure looks like a fan in new video of them together

revealed today by NBC News.  That`s next. 




O`DONNELL: Because Donald Trump has the most limited vocabulary of any

President in history, his public assessment of people usually comes down to

fan or not a fan. Last week, the President said this about his old friend,

convicted sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein, who now faces new sex crimes






not a fan of his that I can tell you.




O`DONNELL: NBC has discovered archived video of Donald Trump appearing to

be a fan of Jeffrey Epstein at a party at Donald Trump`s Florida home in

1992. In the video, Donald Trump is seen greeting Jeffrey Epstein. Surely

looks like a fan there and then hanging with Jeffrey Epstein when he was

trying to grope the women at the party. Looks like a fan there too.


The Federal Judge in the Epstein case in Manhattan will rule tomorrow on

whether he will grant bail to Jeffrey Epstein. The tiny chance that the

judge would grand bail became tinnier today when prosecutors reveal that

the fake passport that they found Jeffrey Epstein`s possession appeared to

have been issued by - had been used by Jeffrey Epstein several times.


Yesterday Epstein`s lawyers said the passport was never used and its

purpose was to try to convince potential terrorists that Jeffrey Epstein is

not Jewish. It is an Austrian passport that contains Jeffrey Epstein`s

picture but a different name and shows Jeffrey Epstein`s residence to be

Saudi Arabia.


Today prosecutors said that the passport “Contains numerous ingress and

egress stamps including stamps that reflect use of the passport to enter

France, Spain, The United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia in the 1980s”. And

Gabriel Sherman is reporting in “Vanity Fair,” tonight that the Epstein

case could create problems for more people outside the courtroom than just

Donald Trump.


Attorney David Boies who represents some of the women who have accused

Jeffrey Epstein of sexually abusing them when they were in their house said

nobody who is around Epstein a lot is going to have an easy time now. It`s

all going to come out.


Another person involved with litigation against Jeffrey Epstein told

Gabriel Sherman “It`s going to be staggering, the amount of names”. After a

break, Joyce Vance will join our discussion with what she expects to see in

court tomorrow.




O`DONNELL: Today in “Vanity Fair”, Gabriel Sherman is reporting that a

release of court documents in the Jeffrey Epstein case could reveal sexual

abuse by “Numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business

executives and foreign Presidents a well-known Prime Minister and other

world leaders”.


Joining our discussion now is Joyce Vance Former U.S. Attorney for the

Northern District of Alabama and MSNBC Legal Analyst Tony Schwartz is still

with us.


Joyce that reporting in “Vanity Fair” today is really quite stunning, but I

want to begin with what you expect to see in court tomorrow on Jeffrey

Epstein`s attempt to secure bail after what we saw unfold with the fake

passport this week?


It sounds like Jeffrey Epstein lied to his lawyers about it, saying the

passport was never used or much worse for the lawyers, the lawyers lied to

the judge about it?



that`s right Lawrence. Whatever the truth is, between those two options

Epstein`s lawyers are on record telling the court that he never used the

passport when clearly he traveled under it. That`s sort of the nail in the

coffin here. Because what the judge is called upon to do there is a very

specific federal statute about detention and it says that the judge shall

detain the defendant pending trial unless it`s clear that he is not a

flight risk or danger to the community.


Once the government establishes by a preponderance of the evidence or that

it`s more likely than not that he`s a flight risk, then the judge has to

take him into custody. Even leaving aside the high likelihood here that,

Epstein poses an ongoing danger to the community, that he might that

continues to tamper with witnesses. The flight risk alone would justify

holding him.


O`DONNELL: And Joyce, let me get you on Gabriel Sherman`s reporting in

“Vanity Fair” where David Boies lawyer involved with some of the victims in

the case is saying it`s all going to come out, all the names are going to

come out. And then Gabriel Sherman is reporting those names include leaders

of foreign countries and American politicians. It`s a stunning list of the

kinds of people whose names could be revealed through this process. How

will that take shape? Where do you expect the exposure of other people to



VANCE: So I think it`s always important to not get ahead of yourself in

this sort of a situation, but David Boies has a lot of credibility in this

area. If he is representing what his clients will say, when they`re

interviewed or perhaps publicly sooner, I think it`s likely that we will

begin to see this information come out.


If it comes out in the course of the criminal case in the Southern District

of New York that could possibly be a trial or it might not even become

relevant there if there is a plea or a trial. I do think we will continue

to see reporting though this is so explosive and given the names that we

have already seen connected to Epstein and names that we know were

contained in his rolodex and phone book I think that there are a lot of

people who aren`t sleeping very well right now.


O`DONNELL: Tony before Donald Trump became what he now calls not a fan of

Jeffrey Epstein he said this publicly about him. I have known Jeff for 15

years terrific guy fun to be with. It is even said he likes beautiful women

as much as I do and many of them are on the younger side. It sounds like

that Donald Trump knew pretty much what there was to know about Jeffrey

Epstein at that time?


TONY SCHWARTZ, MSNBC LEGAL ANALYST: You know, when you think about it Trump

really only involves himself with rogues and grifters and sexual abusers.

What`s ironic about all this when we talk - when David Boies talks about

who is going to be exposed in this is that Trump has now been exposed over

and over as a sexual predator and this reinforces the kind of connection he

had to one of the world`s biggest sexual predators. And yet we know that

somehow he will not go down in the same way that others will.


O`DONNELL: Yeah, because Joyce, other people whose names might be mentioned

might never have been mentioned in connection to anything like this before

and that`s actually likely to mean more damage to their reputation since

the Trump reputation is already so damaged?


VANCE: I think that`s true. Certainly he comes to this situation with a lot

of baggage, but interesting for anyone who is involved in this is that the

statute that Epstein is charged with which is trafficking does not have a

statute of limitations. And I think for anyone who had involved with

Epstein that was criminal in nature that involved being any part of his

operation knowing this statute is still live and can be used for a

conspiracy or for obstruction of justice as well as for committing the apps

that Epstein is charged with that has to be unnerving at this point.


O`DONNELL: And Tony for Donald Trump, a guy like Jeffrey Epstein has two

angles of interest for him. One is the money angle. They are both people

with mysterious relationships to money. No one has quite figured even now

how Jeffrey Epstein made his money. And then there is the access to women

which Donald Trump was always looking for.


SCHWARTZ: Well, when you see in that video from today, is that there are 30

women who he moved, 30 cheerleaders that he has moved - Trump is moving the

train with his hands all over them. Epstein was an expert at that. Again, I

talked earlier about who Trump looks up to. I didn`t mention Putin and Kim

Jong-Un and other autocrats.




SCHWARTZ: – but also to various rouges. Jeffrey Epstein would be a hero to

him at that time.


O`DONNELL: A hero?


SCHWARTZ: Meaning this guy really can get girls and really young and

beautiful girls. So in my mind this guy has got what it takes.


O`DONNELL: I will have to leave it there for tonight. Joyce Vance and Tony

Schwartz, thank you both very much for joining us. And when we come back

Rush Limbaugh has now confessed that he didn`t mean what he was saying for

all those years before he switched all those positions of his to become a

Trump supporter. That`s next.




O`DONNELL: Remember Rush Limbaugh? He used to be the person who reliably

made the most outrageous and indefensible public comments on the right wing

of American politics until Donald Trump came along. And now it`s impossible

for Rush Limbaugh to stir controversy in a country with a President who

makes Rush Limbaugh seem shy.


Rush Limbaugh was never the leader of his radio audience. He was always

their follower which he proved when he changed so many of his policy

positions and his public positions on morality to become a Trump supporter

and a half step after his audience became Trump supporters.


And yesterday Rush Limbaugh offered yet another public surrender to

Trumpism. It came in the middle of a phone call on his show from Douglas in

San Diego who was urging Republicans to nominate “A young potentially two-

term President, one that believes in fiscal conservatism”.


Douglas pointed out, in 2019 there is going to be a trillion-dollar deficit

Trump doesn`t really care about that, he is not really a fiscal

conservative to which Rush Limbaugh actually said nobody is a fiscal

conservative anymore. All this talk about concern for the deficit and the

budget has been bogus for as long as it has been around.


Rush Limbaugh didn`t offer any hint that he was aware that he was

confessing to his own burgosity in attacking every Democratic President

over the size of the national debt. So it is with Republicans now they

defend things they used to attack they attack things they used to defend.

They impeached President Clinton for behavior that President Trump has



Republicans say nothing about Donald Trump being ineffective now unindicted

coconspirator in the Southern District of New York where federal

prosecutors say that he committed federal crimes with Michael Cohen and

directed Michael Cohen to help him commit those crimes to win the



And the Republicans who impeached Bill Clinton say there is nothing wrong

with that and there is nothing wrong with his conduct as President. The

current Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee who was one of the

prosecutors of Bill Clinton in the Senate Impeachment Trial now says there

is nothing in Donald Trump`s conduct as a Presidential Candidate allegedly

committing crimes to get elected or in his conduct as President that is

worthy of even a single Congressional hearing.


Conservative Columnist George Will who left the Republican Party when

Donald Trump won the Republican nomination is worried about what the Trump

Presidency means for our future. Here`s what he had to say about that in an

interview with “The New York Times” Book Review Podcast.





President has done to our culture, to our civic discourse, you cannot

unring these bells and you cannot unsay what he has said. And you cannot

change that he has now in a very short time made it seem normal for

schoolboy taunts and obvious lies to be spun out in a constant stream. I

think this will do more lasting damage than Richard Nixon`s surreptitious

burglaries did.




O`DONNELL: Pulitzer Prize-Winning Columnist George Will joins us after this

final break.




O`DONNELL: Michigan Congressman Justin Amash left the Republican Party two

weeks ago and is now an independent. Yesterday he voted with the Democrats

in the house to condemn what President Trump said about four Democratic

members of the House of Representatives.


And he tweeted this. “If you`re a Republican, please ask yourself if the

party really represents your principles and values. You don`t need to

become a Democrat. Simply stand up for what is right. America`s tradition

of liberty is beautiful and it depends on our love and respect for one



Joining our discussion now is George F. Will, Pulitzer Prize-Winning

Syndicated Columnist for “The Washington Post” and the Author of the new

book “The Conservative Sensibility.” He is also an MSNBC Political Analyst.


George, I want to get your reaction to something that Lindsey Graham just

said tonight on Fox News about President Trump. He said, “From a Republican

view you don`t have a lot to complain about.” So I guess Republicans no

longer have anything to complain about in the national debt or a trillion-

dollar deficit or tariffs, and the list goes on?


WILL: Well, that`s the buck gore such argument that he may be coarsening,

he may lie all the time he may discredit the United States at home and

abroad but gore such. There are very few Republicans who seem to have

really drunk the kool-aid that is to mean what they say. I`d say Mike Pence

and Lindsey Graham are the two. The others I think without any affection or

respect for the President, which makes what they do in a way worse because

what they`re doing is saying it`s all because we`re invertebrate and

completely terrified that we`re doing this.


O`DONNELL: George, your point about how this Presidency could be more

damaging than the Nixon Presidency was, please expand on that?


WILL: Well, Nixon`s burglaries were surreptitious. That is, they were done

in private. They were hidden because they were against the norms that were

not challenged by Nixon. He evaded them but didn`t challenge them. He

didn`t refute them. He didn`t degrade them.


Donald Trump says, and to be fair to Mr. Trump he`s fulfilling a campaign

promise. He promised to overturn the norms and he`s doing so. When a

President goes overseas and quotes – he was actually misquoting but that`s

par for the course. But when he purports to quote the dictator of North

Korea describing a Former Vice President of the United States, Joe Biden,

as a low “IQ idiot” and approves this that takes him into a realm no

President ever before has ventured into.


O`DONNELL: You believe that this is a behavior that will be imitated post-



WILL: Well, you can`t unring the bells. You can`t unsay what he is saying.

And it`s amazing to me how fast. And we saw this in the 20th century in a

number of ways. How fast something could go from unthinkable to thinkable

to action. And it doesn`t seem to me it`s going to be easy to just snap

back as though this didn`t happen. It happened. And he got away with it.

And he became President. And there will be emulators.


O`DONNELL: I want to get to a specific point of the fiscal conservatism and

Rush Limbaugh is saying oh, no one ever believed that which I personally

don`t believe. When I was working in the Senate, I believed that the

Republicans across the aisle and Democrats actually meant what they were

saying about the deficit and the debt.


But politically it`s very difficult to wrestle with, and in your new book

“The Conservative Sensibility” you quote my old boss Daniel Patrick

Moynihan talking about that phrase he used, “civic religion,” about

minimalist government. And you put it that it is avowed but not

constraining, this civic religion. It`s one thing to aspire to a certain

value in politics and then fail to achieve it. It`s something else to say

oh, no, no, we never meant that, we don`t care about that anymore. That`s

what Rush Limbaugh`s saying.


WILL: Yeah, that said that the talk about balanced budgets was like Soviet

grain total quotas, that no one believed them even in the Soviet Union. I

think it`s possible, Lawrence, that the political class is more united by

self-interest than it is divided by ideology and the self-interest is that

it`s in everyone`s self-interest to give the American people a dollar`s

worth of government, charge them 80 cents for it. It pleases the public.


You shift 20 percent, 25 percent or 20 percent of the government off on the

future generations that are un-consenting because they`re unborn and we go

merrily along. We`re about to run a trillion-dollar deficit at more than

full employment, at reasonably steady economic growth. What is going to

happen, Lawrence, when the next recession starts, starts at a trillion-

dollar deficit?


O`DONNELL: And what is going to happen to Republican politics post-Trump?

If a Democrat is sworn in on the next Inauguration Day, will Republicans in

the Congress immediately return to deficit concerns?


WILL: Well, it`s going to be interesting. What do the evangelicals, who

have worshiped at the golden calf of Donald Trump, going to say? Are they

going to snap back into saying character matters in politics? I don`t think

so. The laugh test will be they will flunk. Republicans having given us our

first trillion-dollar deficit again in good economic conditions, can they

just snap back? I don`t know.


You know, Gene McCarthy, late senator from Massachusetts, ran for president

in 1968, the hero of your fine book on 1968, Gene McCarthy once said the

Washington epistemology is this, anything said three times becomes a fact.




WILL:  And the Republicans now will say as the Democrats are guilty in

their own way, they`ll say something three times and decide that it`s a



O`DONNELL:  George, the video replay will show you that slipped

Massachusetts instead of Minnesota, which I know you meant for Gene

McCarthy.  And I just want to correct it here because I know you`d want us

to.  And I know –


WILL:  I`ll say it three times and make it a fact.


O`DONNELL:  There you go.  That`s the way to do it.  George F. Will gets

tonight`s LAST WORD.  Thank you for joining us, George.  Really appreciate

it.  “THE 11TH HOUR” with Brian Williams starts now.




BE UPDATED.                                                                                                    



Copyright 2019 ASC Services II Media, LLC.  All materials herein are

protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,

distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the

prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter

or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the