John Paul Stevens, has died. TRANSCRIPT: 7/16/19, The Last Word w/ Lawrence O’Donnell.

Debbie Dingell, Karine Jean-Pierre, Suzette Hackney, Tim Alberta, Ezra Klein, Neal Katyal

LAWRENCE O`DONNELL, MSNBC HOST:  Good evening, Rachel. 


Do you need any more time?  Because I wouldn`t dare try to do that. 


RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST:  I threw out half my show and then I ended with

singing on TV.  Do you know how messed up all of this is? 


O`DONNELL:  The Rachel greatest hits of singing on TV.  Another very

important entry.  How long will we have to wait for the next one, Rachel? 


MADDOW:  Have I ever sung on TV before?


O`DONNELL:  Not to me, no.  That`s why it`s – so that`s been almost ten



MADDOW:  Well, you got a birthday coming up, you know. 


O`DONNELL:  There we go. 


MADDOW:  La!  Thanks, Lawrence. 


O`DONNELL:  Thank you, Rachel. 


Well, during the presidential campaign, Republican Congressman Kevin

McCarthy, who is now the leader of the Republicans in the House of

Representatives, said behind closed doors that he believed that Donald

Trump was actually a paid agent of Vladimir Putin.  He said he thought

Putin paid Trump. 


Now, Kevin McCarthy is a public worshipper of Donald Trump and he would

attack anyone who said anything like that.  Might even attack me for

reminding the world that Kevin McCarthy said that. 


The Republican senators who ran for president against Donald Trump – Marco

Rubio, Ted Cruz, Lindsey Graham – they all called Donald Trump a con man

repeatedly on the campaign.  They called him a liar during the presidential

campaign.  And now they are all public worshippers of Donald Trump. 


How did that happen? 


The first best answers to that question will be found by future historians

in Tim Alberta`s new book, “American Carnage.” 


This is the perfect night to have Tim Alberta join us, as he will later in

this hour, after a day in which Republicans once again fell in line with

Donald Trump and defended the indefensible.  But this time there were four

defenses.  That means President Trump has four new members of the House of

Representatives to attack. 


The four Republicans who voted to condemn Donald Trump`s racist attack on

four Democratic members of the House of Representatives, all of whom are

women of color, the four Republicans who stood on the right side of history

in tonight`s vote are Fred Upton of Michigan, Will Hurd of Texas, Brian

Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania, and Susan Brooks of Indiana.  Those

Republicans saw Donald Trump`s tweeted defense today, and in their votes

tonight they said, no, we don`t believe Donald Trump. 


Every other Republican who voted not to condemn the president but voted in

effect to condemn themselves, they did that, they voted to condemn

themselves in history as actively complicit in the president`s racism. 


Before the vote, the president tweeted: Those tweets were not racist.  I

don`t have a racist bone in my body.  The so-called vote to be taken is a

Democratic con game.  Republicans should not show weakness and fall into

their trap.


I don`t know why the president capitalizes the “R” in the word “racist” the

way religious people capitalize the letter “G” in “God” out of reverence

for that word. 


Is it Donald Trump`s reverence for the word “racist?” is that what he is

signaling to racists with that upper case “R” for “racist?” is that what

he`s doing? 


Every Republican showed weakness and fell into Donald Trump`s racist trap

today except those four Republicans who voted against Donald Trump`s



Why is it always the bones?  Why do racists always talk about their bones,

as in I don`t have a racist bone in my body, says the president of the

United States.  Does he say it that way because even Donald Trump knows

what it would sound like if he said, “I don`t have a racist thought in my

mind, I`ve never had a racist thought in my mind”?


It could not be easier in this House of Representatives to know how to vote

on a resolution condemning racism because 79-year-old John Lewis of Georgia

is still a member of the House of Representatives.  John Lewis is, of

course, a scarred veteran, literally scarred veteran of the civil rights

movement beginning in the 1950s when he was a teenager. 


He was in the march across the bridge in Selma, Alabama, in 1965 with the

Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.  John Lewis was nearly beaten to death

that day by the government officials with badges who wanted him and Dr.

King and all of those marchers to go back, to go back away from that

bridge, to go back away from progress, to go back and live in submission to

their governmental authority. 


Donald Trump`s go back to where you came from rant against Congresswoman

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley, Congresswoman

Rashida Tlaib and Congresswoman Ilhan Omar is the 21st century Trump White

House version of what police did to John Lewis on that bridge in Selma and

he knows it.  John Lewis knows it. 


On days like today, if you listen to one speaker in the House of

Representatives debate, it should be the Honorable John Lewis. 




REP. JOHN LEWIS (D-GA):  I rise with a sense of righteous indignation to

support this resolution.  I know racism when I see it.  I know racism when

I feel it.  And at the highest level of government, there`s no room for



The world is watching.  They are shocked and dismayed because it seems we

have lost our way as a nation, as a proud and great people.  We are one

Congress and we are here to serve one house, the American house, the

American people. 


Some of us have been victims of the stain, the pain and the hurt of racism. 

In the `50s and during the `60s, segregationists told us to go back.  We

were protesting for our rights.  They told ministers, priests, rabbis and

nuns to go back.  They told the innocent little children seeking just an

equal education to go back. 


As a nation and as a people, we need to go forward and not backward. 




O`DONNELL:  Leading off our discussion tonight is Democratic Congresswoman

Debbie Dingell of Michigan, someone who was on the House floor today.  Also

joining us, Karine Jean-Pierre, chief public officers for and a

MSNBC contributor, and Suzette Hackney, director of opinion and community

engagement for the “Indianapolis Star.”  She wrote an editorial entitled

“Trump is an unhinged racist and Indiana`s congressional members wimpy



Congresswoman Debbie Dingell, I want to start with you.  You were there. 

You were on the floor.  It took awhile of parliamentary haggling to get to

this vote, but it turned out that there were four Republicans, and only

four, who joined you in this vote. 


Justin Amash, recent Republican, now an independent also joined you in this

vote.  And I guess we are now awaiting the tweet attacks at minimum that

Donald Trump will deliver – will deliver to those four Republicans. 


REP. DEBBIE DINGELL (D-MI):  Well, all four of those Republicans as well as

Justin are good friends, and yesterday they spoke up and spoke out against

this hatred.  The president of the United States` job is to unite us and

those tweets are dividing us as a country and it`s got to stop, and at some

point, you`ve got to speak up and speak out. 


O`DONNELL:  And, Suzette Hackney, your article came out before this vote

and it may be that you moved one of these votes in the Indiana delegation. 



Brooks, who has the political freedom, she is not running for re-election,

she did – she did make a statement saying that the comments were

inappropriate, but most of the Indiana delegation did not do so, and I did

write and I said that we all needed to speak out about this.  It did not

matter which political party. 


O`DONNELL:  Karine, your reaction to what we saw in the House today. 



saw in the House outside these four very break Republicans because now,

like you said, they`re going to be attacked by Donald Trump any minute now,

any second now, is that you have Republicans who decided that they were not

going to call out Donald Trump`s blatant racism and what did they do

instead?  They attacked Democrats for bringing forth a very simple

resolution to call out that said racism. 


And here we are in 2019, you have one party that has the Senate, that has

the White House, that refuses to call out racism.  But we shouldn`t be

surprised, Lawrence, because I`ll say this, we knew Donald Trump was a



In 2011, when he decided to be the grand wizard of the birther movement,

what happened in 2015?  They nominated him.  They elected him.  And now,

they encourage him.  And this is where we are today in 2019. 


O`DONNELL:  Congresswoman Dingell, Nick Ramsey, who is one of the producer

of Brian Williams` “THE 11TH HOUR,” pointed out on twitter today that what

the president said looks like a violation of federal law under the Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission`s rules which say examples of potentially

unlawful conduct include insults, taunting or ethnic epithets such as

making fun of a person`s foreign accent or comments like “go back to where

you came from,” whether made by superiors or co-workers. 


So, it is possible that anyone else working in the federal government could

have been fired for what Donald Trump said, it`s just that the only way to

fire the person in Donald Trump`s job is through impeachment. 


DINGELL:  If that were to have been – his tweets were to have been said at

any workplace across America, it would have been an instant firing



You know, I want to speak beyond these four colleagues of mine, but I

represent – it was xenophobic as well.  I represent wasn`t of the largest

Muslim populations in this country.  This man does not understand what he`s

doing to little children.  I go into the grade schools there and I have

children grabbing my legs, telling me they are afraid that someone is going

to come into their house in the middle of the night, take their family out

and never be seen again. 


This is the United States of America in 2019.  This is not Germany.  And we

need to think about the message that we are sending to people.  We are

trying to divide this country with fear, hatred – it`s divisive and not



O`DONNELL:  Let`s listen to Donald Trump in the past in the way he

describes himself as not being a racist. 





racist, you`re racist.  They keep saying it. 


INTERVIEWER:  Are you a racist? 


TRUMP:  Absolutely not.  So many of my friends who are black, they say, you

are the least racist person. 


I am the least racist person that you`ve ever met.  Believe me. 




O`DONNELL:  Suzette, your reaction to the way Donald Trump defends himself

on this? 


HACKNEY:  Well, he started by saying – he might as well have just said “I

have many black friends.”  It`s just laughable at this point. 


O`DONNELL:  Karine, I am the least racist person that you have ever met. 


JEAN-PIERRE:  Basically that`s what racist people say. 


O`DONNELL:  Exactly. 


JEAN-PIERRE:  I mean, it`s exactly that. 


O`DONNELL:  That is in and of itself a badge of racism.  He is saying he is

less racist than you. 




O`DONNELL:  He`s saying he is less racist than John Lewis. 




O`DONNELL:  He is taking a higher moral ground for himself than John Lewis. 


JEAN-PIERRE:  Exactly, and like I said, that`s what racist people say.  My

best friend is black.  Or, you know, I have – I have – not one racist

bone in my body, which I don`t even know what that means.  Please tell me

where that would be, that racist bone in your body. 


By the way, what does a nonracist bone look like?  I mean, it`s – look,

Donald Trump is who he is.  He has shown us that over and over and over

again in his policies, the way he talks about black people, the way he

talks about Mexicans when he first entered the race.  He is who he is.


And the problem is, Lawrence, the reason he continues this behavior is

because Republicans do not hold him accountable.  They do not call him out. 

So what does he do?  He doubles down and he triples down and he`s not going

to stop because he believes it works. 


O`DONNELL:  Let`s listen to what Speaker Pelosi said on the House floor





REP. NANCY PELOSI (D-CA):  Every single member of this institution,

Democratic and Republican, should join us in condemning the president`s

racist tweets.  To do anything less would be a shocking rejection of our

values and a shameful abdication of –




PELOSI:  – our oath of office to protect the American people. 




O`DONNELL:  Congresswoman Dingell, what did it feel like on the House today

– on the House floor, the overall sensation of that full experience on the



DINGELL:  You know, it was tense at times.  You know that it broke down

when Republicans were trying to get process votes that didn`t get at the

substance.  They were trying to – they`re learning tactics from President

Trump, which is divert from the attention on the issue that`s really at



But our caucus was united.  I have not seen our caucus this united in

standing up to hatred.  That we simply cannot tolerate anymore.  President

Trump gave us a gift on Sunday.  He united our caucus in a way it hasn`t

been in months. 


O`DONNELL:  And, Suzette, what is – what is – what do you see in these

four votes, these four Republican votes?  Going to you on this. 


You`re in Indiana.  It`s a very Republican state.  One of the members of

the Indiana delegation who you pointed out specifically in your column

before this vote voted against the president today.  She is a retiring

member but she`s an important member of the House. 


Is there something in this for future possible cracks of Republican support

for the president? 


HACKNEY:  Absolutely.  I think that Republicans are going to have to start

listening to the American people. 


Yes, I live in a very red state.  I have heard from so many readers who

reached out to me today on both sides of the aisle and they said this is

unacceptable.  We as Americans cannot allow this – this kind of division

to happen any longer. 


And I think that if these Republicans are going to represent their voters,

they are going to have to start listening to their voters and Americans are

very unhappy.  I`ve gotten tons of emails from Republicans who say I`m a

Republican all my life, but we cannot continue to go down this road. 


O`DONNELL:  And, Karine, the president had an opportunity to move on from

this.  He is the one who kept it alive.  He is the one who started tweeting

– started his day tweeting about this every day for the last three days. 

So, this is clearly a decision of his to keep this going. 


JEAN-PIERRE:  Right.  He believes that it works.  He thought that he was

going to continue the divide, right?  Just think about what we were talking

about on Saturday or early Sunday, which was Nancy Pelosi versus the squad,

as they`re called, right? 


And what he did, it`s so true, what the congresswoman did, he delivered a

gift to Democrats because he thought – he thought he could get in there

and divide the two sides and – into the Democratic side even more, and all

he did was unify them and it backfired on him, what he did.  Bringing in,

inserting racism actually hurt him more because the majority of the people

do not want to hear that. 


That`s what we saw in 2018 when he doubled down with the caravan, when he

doubled down on immigration.  People – people came out and voted against

what Donald Trump was about.  It was a referendum on him. 


He did not learn his lesson.  He`s thinking now I`m going to triple down

and it didn`t work.  And now, you see a unified Democratic party and they

are where the majority of the people are. 


O`DONNELL:  Congresswoman Dingell, take us inside the party caucus meeting

before this vote.  In situations like this, generally as many – if not the

entire party gathers behind a closed door to talk about what`s going to

happen on the house floor today.  What was that meeting like today? 


DINGELL:  You know, it was candid conversation, but frequently when you`re

in meetings like this there are a lot of different opinions and there

wasn`t anybody who didn`t know that we needed to take this vote, that we

needed to stand up.  I think that we want to make sure that we stand up to

hatred, we stand up to division, but at the same time we can`t let him

divert us every single day.  We`ve got to get back to doing the people`s

business.  We`ve got to deliver for the people. 


So we`ve got to get back to health care, which he`s not delivering on. 

He`s not lowering prescription drug prices.  We have to get back to talking

about the environment, to infrastructure, so we`re also focused on how we

got to get back to working for the people, which he would like to keep us

off that message every day.  That`s what he does. 


And we cannot let him keep us from delivering for the people that we

promised to.  By the way, he`s got to deliver for these people, too.  He

got elected in Michigan because he talked about many of these issues.  If

we haven`t done something about it, he`s going to have problems in this

next election. 


O`DONNELL:  Suzette, as a member of the press, how do you see the challenge

for journalism in this, in how to cover these kinds of outbursts by the



HACKNEY:  Well, first of all, we just have to cover the truth.  And we have

to call it what it is.  We can`t dance around it.  It`s racist.  It was



And those are – and that`s why you saw many publications that came out

with very hard-hitting editorials and columns like mine calling it what it

is.  We have to stand up for America. 


We are – we guard America.  That is our job.  And that`s what we will

continue to do. 


You know, there`s the fake news that`s thrown around and, you know, he gets

his based all ramped up talking about us and booing us at his – at his

rallies and such, but I think we`ve done nothing but proven that we are

here to cover this administration, to cover this president, to uncover the

truth, and that`s what we will continue to do. 


O`DONNELL:  Congresswoman Debbie Dingell, Karine Jean-Pierre, Suzette

Hackney, thank you very much for starting us off tonight.  Really

appreciate it. 


DINGELL:  Thank you. 


O`DONNELL:  When we come back later in this hour, Ezra Klein will be here. 

We will discuss what Suzette was just talking about and what this means in

both political journalism and the presidential campaign going forward. 


Also tonight, Neal Katyal will join us with his memories of Justice John

Paul Stevens, retired Supreme Court justice, who died tonight at the age of





O`DONNELL:  Today, four Republicans broke with the president and voted to

condemn Donald Trump`s most recent racist comments, but that`s four more

Republicans than usually break with the president.  But Donald Trump has

taken complete control of the Republican Party is obvious to everyone.  How

he did it is not. 


That story is told in the new book “American Carnage: On the Front Lines of

the Republican Civil War and the Rise of President Trump” by Tim Alberta. 


It tells the story of Paul Ryan`s public subservience to the president, in

Paul Ryan`s own words.  Quote: I told myself I got to have a relationship

with this guy to help him get his mind right, because I`m telling you, he

didn`t know anything about government, so I thought I can`t be his scold

like I was.  I wanted to scold him all the time. 


What I learned as I went on, to scratch that itch, I had to do it in

private, so I did it in private all the time and he actually ended up kind

of appreciating it.  We had more arguments with each other than pleasant

conversations over the last two years, and it never leaked.


Today, the man who took Paul Ryan`s place, House Majority Leader Kevin

McCarthy, insists that Paul Ryan never said that. 




REP. KEVIN MCCARTHY (R-CA):  You`re quoting something based upon a book

that I have not read and in talking to Speaker Ryan, I know that`s not the

words of what he would use because I`ve been in rooms with him and the





O`DONNELL:  And joining us now is the author of that book, Tim Alberta.

He`s the chief political correspondent for “Politico” magazine and the

author of “American Carnage.”


Tim, so, Kevin McCarthy says your book is false, Paul Ryan never said it. 


TIM ALBERTA, AUTHOR, “AMERICAN CARNAGE”:  I`m happy to give him the

audiotape.  I`m not sure what else to say –




O`DONNELL:  So, you should have brought it tonight.  So it happens to be on



But this is the very same Kevin McCarthy who during the campaign was quoted

from behind closed doors from a secret staff source, Republican staff

source saying he believed Donald Trump took money from Vladimir Putin.  And

there he is today doing exactly a public execution of the transformation

that this book describes for Republicans.  Going from Trump takes money

from Putin to I don`t believe Paul Ryan would ever have said that about

Donald Trump. 


ALBERTA:  How dare he?.  Why would he say that about the dear leader? 




ALBERTA:  Look, Kevin McCarthy is just one of many Republicans who as you

noted, Lawrence, has essentially fallen in line behind President Trump. 

And they do so in any number of reasons, political self-preservation, a

fear of backlash from the president and the president`s base, and I think

what`s so fascinating in surveying this modern Republican Party is how far

it has come in such a short period of time. 


This was not a Trumpian entity as recently as ten years ago.  George W.

Bush`s presidency for its many failings was a presidency built upon these

ideals of compassionate conservatism and, you know, refugee resettlement

was a huge priority, re-entry programs for prisoners was, you know,

education in urban environments.  These were the bedrock domestic policy

goals of the Bush administration.  Of course, we know that they spent tens

of millions of dollars trying to alleviate AIDS in Africa.  The list goes



The point is, what you`ve seen is nothing short of a wholesale

transformation of Republican Party in the last decade, and there is a lot

that goes into that, it`s a long story, obviously, but what you`re seeing

today and specifically what you would see over the last 96 hours in terms

of the Republican Party`s response to Donald Trump`s remarks or in most

cases their lack of response to his remarks speaks volumes about where the

party is and how firmly Donald Trump has taken the party of Reagan, the

party of George W. Bush and turned it into the party of Trump. 


O`DONNELL:  Yes, there is no previous Republican president who would have

stood for any of this.  I`m fascinated by the policy switches on things

like international trade and other things.  It is stunning to me, because

that happened over a very short period of time.  People who had completely

different views of international trade during the presidential campaign,

just over two years ago, guys like Chuck Grassley and others completely

going along with these tariffs that they would have never gone along with



ALBERTA:  It`s one of the best stories that got no attention at the time,

very little attention at the time, was that in the heat of the 2016

campaign, Paul Ryan and Ted Cruz, who did not get along, these two guys

wrote a joint op-ed in “USA Today” endorsing TPA, basically the legislation

that would have given then President Obama the ability to negotiate trade



O`DONNELL:  Trans Pacific Partnership. 


ALBERTA:  Yes.  And Ted Cruz, about three weeks after this op-ed published,

and, again, he`s in the middle of this, you know, hotly-contested primary

against Donald Trump and Ted Cruz and his team, who are very smart, they`ve

got their ear to the ground, they`re watching what Trump is doing and

they`re seeing this appeal that he is achieving with the electorate and he

is obviously shattering Republican orthodoxy in so doing and Cruz says to

his guys, look, I think we need to have a change of heart here, I think we

need to publicly disavow that stance that we just took with Ryan a couple

of weeks ago, and his guys said, are you crazy?  We just wrote this op-ed. 


And basically, the decision was, look, do we get accused of being a flip-

flopper now or wear that for a couple of weeks and take a beating, or do we

allow Trump to bludgeon us on the issue of trade for a next year a half? 

Now, that`s a small anecdote, but it speaks volumes about where people were

at that point in the party because, again, you spoke to it a second ago. 

The rate of change is what is so whiplash-inducing at this point. 




ALBERTA:  This didn`t happen over a period of 30 or 40 or 50 years.  It`s

really happen – you can even consolidate it down into a period of 36

months in which some core bedrock Republican principles that had been held

since the Reagan era have essentially been thrown out the window. 


O`DONNELL:  Everyone marvels at the Trump relationship to evangelical

voters, who in Donald Trump`s own words are privately referred to in your

own book at the f-ing evangelicals. 


ALBERTA:  It`s a term of endearment.  I should note. 


You know, so it`s fascinating.  Obviously, we`re all transfixed on this

relationship between the – the white evangelical Republican voter and

Donald Trump.  And obviously, this is a group of voters who had spent years

demanding a certain degree of moral leadership from the highest office in

the land and really from all government officials and people want to know

how could they have possibly forged this partnership with this guy, this

thrice married philanderer who paraded the, you know, the pinups and the

porn stars after the tabloids?


And I think the answer, Lawrence, is really quite simple, actually.  It`s

transactional.  We know that Donald Trump is transactional.


I think what we don`t fully appreciate about evangelical voters is many of

them felt let down by the George W. Bush presidency.  They felt like we had

elected one of our own, a guy famously said in that debate that Jesus was

his role model, a guy who sits in the pews with us but he didn`t do all

that much for us. 


Remember, on a lot of these social issues, a lot of conservative movement

felt that George W. Bush was kind of weak in the knees.  So, by the time

2016 rolls around and these people feel like they`ve been trampled under

Barack Obama and the left for the last eight years and they are under siege

from forces of culture and politics.


They`re looking for somebody to get into the arena and start throwing

haymakers. And Trump, again give him credit, he`s prescient. He sees this

and Trump goes to them and basically says, look, you know that I`m not one

of you. I can`t speak your language. I don`t agree with you probably on

half these issues, but I`m willing to go to war for you guys in a way that

none of the rest of these Republican Parties are willing to.


They may talk a good game, but when the going gets tough, they`re going to

fold because they`re all creatures of political convention. I am not. I`m

beholden to no one. It is impossible to articulate just how appealing that

message was to these evangelicals and essentially it became this

transactional relationship. They would give him undying allegiance and he

would give them everything they didn`t get out of George W. Bush.


O`DONNELL:  Tim Alberta and the book is “American Carnage.” And it is the

single best explanation of how we got to Trumpism in the Republican Party.

Tim, when the book store slows down I need you to come back to do this one

question which I think will take an entire segment and that is when the

next President of the United States takes the oath of office, does Trumpism

disappear? You have some time to think about it and we`re going to do a few

minutes on it next chance you get to come by.


ALBERTA: It`s good homework.


O`DONNELL: Yes. Thank you, Tim. And when we come back, the house vote today

was a turning point, perhaps, for four House Republicans, and it has

definitely been a turning point for American journalism. We will have more

on that later in this hour with Ezra Klein.






REPORTER: Does it concern you that many people saw that tweet as racist and

that white nationalist groups are finding common cause with you on that




because many people agree with me.




O`DONNELL: Ezra Klein tweeted that that exchange summarized Donald Trump`s

entire political career which of course begins with Donald Trump telling

racist lies about President Obama`s birth certificate. Today the Columbia

Journalism Review officially gave its permission for the news media to call

racism, racism. “Go back to where you came from is textbook racism. When we

contort ourselves to dance around that fact, the truth is injured.” This

does seem like a turning point for the American news media, much like

September of 2016 when “The New York Times” first used the word “lie” to

describe something Donald Trump said.


But by that time Donald Trump had already lied his way to the Republican

Presidential nomination and was a couple of months away from lying his way

with some help from Russia to an Electoral College victory. Today “The

Arizona Republic`s Editorial Board” published an editorial entitled

“Trump`s racist tweets are a wake-up call for Republicans and Democrats.”


The editorial says there is a great deal of denial going on in America.

We`ve seen enough over the transom to know that plenty are making excuses

for Trump. Here`s some free advice don`t. Yesterday “The Tampa Bay Times

Editorial Board” published an editorial entitled “Trump`s racist ramp

requires a collective response”.


The editorial says Trump`s unrelenting attacks on these four minority women

who are all young and freshmen house members are a new low for this

President. They fit his pattern of racial demagoguery and appeals to white

nationalists. “The Houston`s Chronicle Editorial Board” published an

editorial entitled “The President is a bigot: Patriots can`t stay silent on

racist remarks. This editorial says, “Let`s not mince words they are the

racist rantings of a bigot - not an American patriot who truly believes in

the Constitution he swore to defend as President”.


After this quick break we`ll be joined by Ezra Klein and Karine Jean-Pierre

will be back to discuss what the news media`s new condemnation of Donald

Trump`s racism adds to the House of Representatives condemnation that

passed the house tonight.




O`DONNELL: Here is Democratic Presidential Candidate Senator Kamala Harris

in Davenport, Iowa today.





that, go back to where you came from, you too, and I bet if we took -

everybody raised their hands.




HARRIS: Right. And in the back, people are raising their hands too. It is

vile. It is ignorant. It is shallow. It is hateful. And it has to stop. It

has to stop.




O`DONNELL: Joining our discussion now is Ezra Klein, the Editor-at-Large of

VOX and the host of the podcast “The Ezra Klein Show” Karine Jean-Pierre is

back with us. And Karine, let me start with you, have you been told to go

back to where you came from?



parents have been told to go back to where they came from. I have. My

parents are Haitian American. They`re clearly immigrants in this country.

They`ve been here for decades.


O`DONNELL: You were born here?


JEAN-PIERRE: I was born actually in Martinique -




JEAN-PIERRE: –so I am an immigrant myself. I`ve heard it all my life. I

think if you`re a person of color living in this country, you`ve heard that

awful, historical, nasty, racist talking point that Donald Trump threw out

there in a tweet on Sunday and doubled down on Monday, and it is hurtful.


And it basically is saying to you, you do not belong - we do not want you

here. Even though you are as American as anyone else, even though you give

to society, this is the only place that you may have known, like myself.

And what he did really, really lays out who he truly is.


O`DONNELL: And Ezra, other populations throughout our history, immigrant

population, Jewish population, Irish, Italian, they all heard this at a

certain point after their arrival and as they continued through American

light - life to go back to where you came from.


EZRA KLEIN, VOX EDITOR-AT-LARGE: This is classic racism. I mean, it doesn`t

get more classic than this. And its Donald Trump`s fundamental career has

always been founded on, the idea that he is out there saying what - what

many people agree with, is the way he put it.


I think the hard question with Trump constantly is not whether we in the

press should call racism, racism. Of course we should. The question is

whether or not we should let him dominate the political agenda with it

whenever he wants.


The thing that I always worry about with Donald Trump is that he has

understood on some gut level, I don`t know that it`s strategy, but it`s

certainly at this point intuition, that if he loses control of the

conversation, he can always say something outrageous, something offensive

and then it is at least back along the divisive lines that he prefers

arguing around. It is at least back under the argument that he wants to

have. Not the arguments that he is uninterested in or doesn`t want to have.


Again, the point is not that it is strategy or even that it is wise, but he

has figured out that there is this hack of just acting outrageously and

offensively. As Kamala Harris says, it would be nice for it to stop, but

it`s not going to stop it`s his core political move.


And I think that`s one of the real challenges here to the press, not just

how - what do we call it? But when do we choose to cover it or say that`s

just Donald Trump insulting people again. He doesn`t get to control the

nation`s agenda every time he does it.


O`DONNELL: Yes. It`s such an important point. And Karine, the - one of the

arguments that`s been put out there is that by covering this the way we do,

we give it more volume. It`s one of the - I try to take as much care as I

can in this. I don`t show Trump video unless I absolutely have to.


I am using the fact that I`m trusting people know everything that Donald

Trump - or a lot of what Donald Trump has said about this. And what I`m

emphasizing tonight is what John Lewis has to say about this and what

others have to say about it, so it does present a challenge, a serious

challenge in how you cover this.


JEAN-PIERRE: It`s been a challenge for everybody. It`s been a challenge

clearly for Republicans and Democrats on the Hill. It`s been a challenge

for the media on how do you deal with a Donald Trump? Because what is

happening is he is not normal, and what we`re doing is we`re treating him

kind of in the guidelines of the rules, right?


Like, oh, yes, he`s not normal, we`re going to have the same protocol we`re

going to follow the same rules as with any other President. What I think we

have seen in the last 24/48 hours with press, with Congress is that they

are seeing, okay, enough is enough. We are not treating this guy like he`s

normal anymore because he is not.


So what Donald Trump does is he overwhelms the system intentionally. He

throws controversy after controversy and hopes something sticks. We just

can`t allow that to happen, as Ezra was saying. We need to be able to

separate the signal from the noise and I think this is the moment we`re in

right now and I hope that it continues, but that`s what`s been going on for

the last two years.


O`DONNELL: Ezra and Karine, can you both stay with us? I`d like to squeeze

in a commercial break here. When we come back, Ezra, I just want to go with

the question of, is this a turning point, is this a turning point for

journalism, what we`ve been through the last couple of days? We`re going to

do a quick break here. We`ll be right back.




O`DONNELL: And we`re back with Ezra Klein and Karine Jean-Pierre. And Ezra,

this feels to me like a turning point in media coverage. I remember vividly

September of 2016, the first time I saw the word “lie” in “The New York

Times.” It was actually in a headline, the first time they used it about

Donald Trump was after he got the Republican nomination. And now it`s every

day. News media has been completely converted to Donald Trump is a liar.

They use the term. Is that where we are now with Donald Trump and racism?


KLEIN: It might it might be if we`ve not already figured out that Donald

Trump is racist. I don`t know what more is needed here. This does not feel

like new information to me, but it might be.


O`DONNELL: Karine, a quick LAST WORD.


JEAN-PIERRE: Yes I think, what we have the way we have to look at it going

into 2020 is Donald Trump wants it to be a choice, 2020 to be a choice on

the election. We need it to be a referendum on him. That`s what we need to

do just like we did in 2018, make it about him, make it about changing

where we are and looking about who we are and what we want this country to

be? It has to be a referendum.


O`DONNELL: So that`s what Democratic Candidates should be doing?


JEAN-PIERRE: I think that`s what Democratic Candidates should be doing, but

also it plays into what the media should be doing as well. It`s like, okay,

turn it on its head. Don`t play on his turf right. Play it the way you want

to play it. Because he`s going to continue to play all of us if we follow

his lead, if we go down that rabbit hole. So it`s a little bit of both,

what media should do and also what candidates should do.


O`DONNELL: We`ll leave it this for tonight. Karine Jean-Pierre and Ezra

Klein, thank you both for joining us. I really appreciate it.


And when we come back Neal Katyal will join us on Former Supreme Court

Justice John Paul Stevens, who died tonight at the age of 99. He was active

in his retirement, and even though he was appointed by a Republican

President, he said that he believed Brett Kavanaugh was not fit to serve on

the United States Supreme Court.




O`DONNELL: Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, the third

longest serving justice in the history of the court died tonight of

complications following a stroke. He was 99 years old.


Justice Stevens was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1975 by Republican

President Gerald Ford. He served on the court for 35 years. Although a

registered Republican, Justice Stevens often sided with the liberal wing of

the court he insisted that it was the court and the Republic - it was not

him but it was The Republican Party not his views that shifted over time.


He supported a woman`s right to choose abortion, he voted to reinstate the

death penalty, a decision he later said he regretted. During the Clinton

Presidency, he led a unanimous court in ruling that a sitting President

could face a civil lawsuit while in office. He offered a blistering

dissenting opinion to the court`s ruling in Bush versus Gore which decided

the Presidential Election in 2000.


He retired in 2010 at the age of 90 and was awarded the Medal of Freedom by

President Obama, the country`s highest civilian honor, but he remained

active in his retirement. After the mass shooting in Parkland, Florida in

2018, Justice Stevens called for the repeal of the second amendment. And

last year he called then Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh unfit to

serve on the Supreme Court.


In a statement tonight, Chief Justice John Roberts said, “Justice Stevens

devoted his long life to public service, including 35 years on the Supreme

Court. He brought to our bench an in inimitable blend of kindness,

humility, wisdom and independence. His unrelenting commitment to Justice

has left us a better nation”.


Joining our discussion now Neal Katyal, Former Acting U.S. Solicitor

General and an MSNBC Legal Contributor. Neal, we feel especially like you

to have you tonight. You actually argued cases in the court and argued

cases to Justice Stevens and your reflections tonight on his career?



in the Supreme Court are heartbroken. And I think the Chief Justice

captured the man well. I mean, I had the privilege of arguing, I think,

over two dozen cases before him, and every single time it was always the

same thing.


He asked just a couple questions to us. They were always the devastating

ones, the ones that you really practiced and hoped no Justice would ask.

And he was just a towering intellect and a prince of a man, just the

politeness, the courteousness and the diligence and the nonpartisanship way

in which he approached the job. When people think of the rule of law in

this country and going back and the phrase in the Massachusetts

constitution of 1780 that we are a government of laws not of men that

describes Justice Stevens.


O`DONNELL: And he was a Republican, but he did not like what he saw

Republicans do in recent years. He said the Senate absolutely should move

on the confirmation of Merrick Garland in the Supreme Court in the last

year of the Obama administration.


KATYAL: Yes, I mean, it`s a striking thing to see the news tonight. Justice

Stevens, the horribly sad news about his passing. At the same time, as the

house has voted to condemn the President for his racist tweets. I mean,

Justice Stevens really was a proud member of a Republican Party that stood

for something, that stood for American values that stood for decency and

respect to all.


And I think you just see with a vote tonight like that party moving in an

absolutely different direction. You know, my hope is that people, all

Americans will reflect on Justice Stevens` legacy and realize that there

are fundamental values to this country and you can disagree with people on

the left or right, but we have to treat people civilly and equally, and

that`s what his entire life`s work was about.


O`DONNELL: A Justice`s career has both ruling opinions and dissenting

opinions, and his dissent in Bush V. Gore is one of the most memorable that

most of us have ever read. He wrote, “Although we may never know with

complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year`s Presidential

Election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the nation`s

confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law”. That

was a very tough experience for him and others on the Supreme Court.


KATYAL: Yes, and also as litigants, I was one of Gore`s lawyers in that

case, and it was heart-wrenching to see the decision come down. And for

every loss that Justice Stevens had, he had a number of enormous wins. With

the very first case are against Supreme Court Horndon (ph) versus Raw

Misfeldt (ph) in which I represented actually Osama-Bin-Laden`s driver,

Justice Stevens wrote the opinion cast the deciding vote to say we have to

protect the constitutional rights of people, even in Guantanamo, even

accused of doing the worst crimes imaginable.


Justice Stevens himself he served in the navy. He understood the values

that this country stood for, including the Geneva Conventions. And so,

again, it`s just a really important lesson, particularly at this juncture

in time, to think, you know, there are things - principles and important

points that transcend left versus right. Justice Stevens stood for that.


O`DONNELL: As is perfectly appropriate for this program, Neal Katyal gets

tonight`s LAST WORD on Justice Stevens.  Thank you very much for joining us

tonight.  We really appreciate it.


KATYAL:  Thank you.


O`DONNELL:  That is tonight`s LAST WORD.  “THE 11TH HOUR” with Brian

Williams starts now.







Copyright 2019 ASC Services II Media, LLC.  All materials herein are

protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,

distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the

prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter

or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the