First Ladies denounce Trump policy. TRANSCRIPT: 06/18/2018. The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell

Guests:
Michael Curry; James Martin; David Frum, Jeff Merkley, Victoria DeFrancesco
Transcript:

Show: THE LAST WORD WITH LAWRENCE O’DONNELL
Date: June 18, 2018
Guest: Michael Curry; James Martin; David Frum, Jeff Merkley, Victoria DeFrancesco

LAWRENCE O’DONNELL, MSNBC HOST: Good evening, Rachel.

And Ginger Thompson, the “ProPublica” reporter who you had on during your
hour has really changed our understanding of this story once again.
There’s been some really heroic journalism coming out of the southern
border, but that audio that she was able to make public of those children
under those conditions is like nothing we’ve ever heard before.

RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST, “TRMS”: That’s right, and there will be –
there will be an ongoing fight to get footage, to get visuals to be able to
show the American people instead of beyond even just allowing us to hear
what it’s like in there with those kids, but that she’s the first one to
have published anything from inside one of those facilities, it’s
absolutely gut-wrenching to hear it. But that will be – this will mark a
pivot point in this story. Mark my words.

O’DONNELL: We’re going to play some of it more than once in this hour and
I really do have to warn people. It is about the most difficult thing you
could hear on this subject.

MADDOW: Yes, seriously, well done. Thank you.

O’DONNELL: Thank you, Rachel.

MADDOW: Thanks, Lawrence.

O’DONNELL: Well, Melania speaks now she didn’t actually speak, but the
current first lady of the United States took the extraordinary step for her
of allowing her spokesperson to issue a written public comment on her
behalf about a government policy, in this case a policy created and ordered
into effect by her husband.

The statement says, Mrs. Trump hates to see children separated from their
families and hopes both sides of the aisle can finally come together to
achieve successful immigration reform. She believes we need to be a
country that follows all laws but also a country that governs with heart.

There is no indication that the first lady has actually spoken to her
husband about this, as every first lady before her certainly would have
done and as we can be sure now, every first lady before Melania Trump has
actually done. They have spoken to their husbands about this and they have
all made much clearer much stronger public comments than the current first
lady.

Michelle Obama retweeted something her predecessor Laura Bush said today,
quote: I live in a border state. I appreciate the need to enforce and
protect our international boundaries, but this zero tolerance policy is
cruel, it is immoral and it breaks my heart.

Laura Bush’s predecessor, that’s First Lady Hillary Clinton, said that
Donald Trump’s family separation policy is, quote, an affront to our
values.

And Rosalynn Carter said the practice and policy today of removing children
from their parents care at our border with Mexico is disgraceful and a
shame to our country.

Last week photojournalist John Moore who has documented wars and refugee
crises around the world captured the moment, the moment that appeared on
the front page of “The New York Times” and showed the world that what was
happening on our southern border is state sanctioned child abuse Trump
ordered child abuse since then we have had a parade of child psychiatrists
and pediatricians stepping forward to say what every parent knows that this
is child abuse.

John Moore, the photographer who has covered war zones and seen it all was
deeply disturbed by what he saw that night. He tried to calm one of the
children who was being separated from his mother by telling him in Spanish:
don’t worry, everything’s going to be OK and John Moore says that he
regretted saying that almost immediately, because he said, quote: I have no
way of knowing if things will be OK.

The president of the United States once again lied about his policy today
and tried to blame the Democrats for a policy that was begun on April 6th
of this year by the attorney general of the United States with this memo
sent to federal prosecutors along the southwest border and titled “zero
tolerance”.

Donald Trump doesn’t have zero tolerance for anything else. He just let a
mother out of prison who was actually tried and convicted of drug dealing
and money-laundering, and that was the right thing to do. At Kim
Kardashian’s urgings, Donald Trump was right to decide that in that case,
zero tolerance for drug dealing and zero tolerance for money laundering
meant zero humanity.

And so, he released one mother from federal custody that day while every
day putting dozens and dozens of mothers into federal custody and
separating them from their babies, from their toddlers, from their
children.

And as the president does this, he lies about it every day and everyone
working for the president lies about it every day. They try to tell the
lie that this April 6th memo from Jeff Sessions does not exist. They try
to tell you that the Democrats did something to make this happen when the
Democrats did nothing to make this happen. Lying is now an official
component of every Trump policy.

First comes the policy, then comes the lie about the policy. Donald Trump
also told the lie last week that he hates what he’s doing.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I hate it. I hate to see
separation of parents and children.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: OK. Now did you catch the kernel of truth in what he actually
did just say? The words are very important. He said I hate to see the
separation of parents and children, and that is true. He does literally
hate to see it, but he doesn’t hate to do it and that’s why he continues to
do it, but he does hate to see it because even Donald Trump can see how
ugly it is, even Donald Trump can see how cruel it is. Even Melania Trump
can see how ugly and cruel it is.

And so, I’m sure Donald Trump does hate to see it, and that’s why he lies
about the policy if he thought his policy looked good if Donald Trump
thought this photograph is America at its best, then Donald Trump wouldn’t
be blaming the Democrats for what you see in that photograph. Donald Trump
would probably be saying I did that and I’m so glad that you can see what I
did.

But Donald Trump hates to see that because he knows how bad that looks and
now Donald Trump is trying – is going to hate not just what it looks like,
but what it sounds like because thanks to “ProPublica”, we now have an
audio recording secretly made at an unnamed children’s prison somewhere on
the southern border.

And now, there are all sorts of euphemisms going around about what these
places are. Is it a Walmart? Is it is it a detention center? Are they
concentration camps as “The New York Post” called them today in an
editorial?

Are they jails? Are they prisons? They are in fact being used as jails
and the experience that the children are having in there is the very same
experience that prisoners get in jails and in prisons where most jails and
prisons have television and recreation of some kind and a small amount of
time of doors.

But every adult in prison in America after being convicted of even the most
heinous crimes can see his or her mother or father if they’re still alive.
Mothers have visiting rights in prisons but the mothers of our southern –
on our southern border have no rights, including basic human rights, not
since April 6th of this year.

This is the secret audio recording released today by “ProPublica”. This is
very difficult to listen to. These are their children and one of Donald
Trump’s jails.

(BEGIN AUDIO CLIP)

BORDER PATROL AGENT: Where are you from?

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: El Salvador.

BORDER PATROL AGENT: And you?

UNIDENTIFEID CHILD: Guatemala.

BORDER PATROL AGENT: Don’t cry.

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: I want to go with my aunt –

BORDER PATROL AGENT: You’re going to get there. Look, she will explain it
and help you.

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: Dad!

CONSULAR WORKER: I’m going to take you to speak to the person from your
consulate, OK?

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: Dad!

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: At least can I go with my aunt? I want here to come -
-

I want my aunt to come so she can take me to her house.

BORDER PATROL AGENT: She’ll help you call your aunt, if you have the
number, so that you can talk to your aunt.

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: I have her number.

BORDER PATROL AGENT: OK, so she’ll help you right now so you can talk to
her.

BORDER PATROL AGENT: Daddy! Daddy!

(CROSSTALK)

(CHILDREN CRYING)

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: Are you going to call my aunt so that when I’m done
eating, she can pick me up?

CONSULAR WORKER: When you get your food, I’ll come back so that –

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: I have her number memorized 34, 72 –

UNIDENTIFIED CHILD: Daddy! Daddy!

(END AUDIO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: Daddy, daddy.

That’s what the day after Father’s Day sounds like in America today. And
I’m sure Donald Trump hates to hear that. I’m sure Donald Trump hates for
us to hear that, but Donald Trump does not actually hate what is happening
there because Donald Trump did that to those children whose voices you just
heard crying for their mothers and fathers and Donald Trump vowed today to
continue to do it.

In an op-ed for “The Washington Post”, former Republican First Lady Laura
Bush offered her own report of life on our southern border.

She wrote: In the six weeks between April 19th and May 31st, the Department
of Homeland Security has sent nearly 2,000 children to mass detention
centers or foster care. More than a hundred of these children are younger
than four years old. The reason for these separations is a zero tolerance
policy for their parents who are accused of illegally crossing our borders.
I live in a border state. I appreciate the need to enforce and protect our
international boundaries, but this zero tolerance policy is cruel. It is
immoral and it breaks my heart.

Laura Bush recalled another Republican first lady, her mother-in-law,
Barbara Bush, who while first lady at the height of the AIDS crisis in this
country visited a home in Washington, D.C. for children with HIV/AIDS.

And those days, many Americans believed they could catch AIDS, simply by
touching a baby with AIDS. They were – those babies were even sometimes
called the untouchables.

Laura Bush remembers the photograph that we all saw a First Lady Barbara
Bush picking up, quote, a dying baby named Donovan and snuggled him against
her shoulder to soothe him. My mother-in-law never viewed her embrace of
that fragile child as courageous. She simply saw it as the right thing to
do.

And so, we are at another possible first lady moment, a moment where the
first lady can actually do something that none of the rest of can in the
jails that Donald Trump is now running on the southern border for children
and toddlers and babies. The rules say that none of the people working
there can touch the children. It is against the rules to hug one of the
toddlers, and you don’t have to be a pediatrician to know the large body of
information we now have about the importance of children being hugged,
especially the youngest ones, the power of the loving hug for a toddler,
for a baby. It is a power that Barbara Bush completely understood.

And so, the current first lady’s moment has come. She never did have that
press conference that her husband promised she was going to have during the
campaign, in which she would explain that she did not violate immigration
law by coming to the United States when she first arrived in the United
States and working here illegally.

Donald Trump promised that she was going to have a press conference in a
couple of weeks two years ago. She never did it. She never explained her
legal status when she first worked in the United States. She’s never done
that.

And so the one and only first lady of the United States who might herself
have violated immigration law when she came to the United States can
tomorrow do something worthy of the title first lady, Melania Trump can go
to the southern border and she can enter any one of the child’s jails that
her husband has created and she can go find for us the girls and the babies
that the Trump government is hiding from us and won’t let us see.

Melania Trump can go and find one of those little girls, find one of those
little babies one of those untouchables like Barbara Bush before her picked
that baby up and hug her and soothe her.

Melania Trump can give one of those untouchable little girls the warmth she
deserves, the hug she deserves. Let’s see how long it would take for the
first lady of the United States to help one of those babies stop crying
just one. Let’s see what the warmth of Melania Trump’s embrace can do from
one immigrant to another.

Joining us now from Capitol Hill is Senator Jeff Merkley, a Democrat from
Oregon who was denied access to one of those facilities in Brownsville,
Texas, ten days ago.

Senator Merkley, thank you very much for joining us.

As Rachel said at the beginning of the hour, you were the one – you were
the senator who first went down to Texas to say we have got to see this.
You pulled our attention with you and the attention has just built over
time. Where do you see this going from here? And what do you think of the
most pressing issues tonight?

SEN. JEFF MERKLEY (D), OREGON: Well, one of the most pressing issues is to
recognize that the situation just gets worse between when I went two weeks
ago and when I went yesterday. We have a whole new development which is
that the border guards are now blocking those seeking asylum at the port of
entries from progressing across the bridge to be able to assert a claim of
asylum.

I couldn’t believe that they were doing this. I heard about this from the
refugee pro bono workers. We went out on the bridge, a group of seven
congressionals. We saw the border guards there blocking those checking
their papers and letting only just a few in, in the course of a day.

If I can, Lawrence, I want to tell you about a little girl named Andrea, or
Andrea. Her mother made it across to assert a claim of asylum and here’s
how she did it. We asked her, how did you get past the border guard? She
smiled, she got a big smile on her face she said, I did it like this. She
said I walked with the cars instead of with the people and pretended I was
washing the windows of those cars until I was close enough to jump back
over in line and be on American soil.

That’s how she did it and she had this little girl in her arms she said her
little girl was sesenta cinco dias, and had been born in route to the
United States and beautiful, beautiful little girl. And we asked, how did
you – why did you come to the U.S.? And she said, my family took a loan
from a private bank, and that private bank is associated with a drug
cartel.

So, we couldn’t repay it. They sent the folks to say that if we didn’t
repay, one of us would die and she said I was marked as soon as I would
deliver my babies, so I had to flee while I was eight months pregnant to
try to make it to the U.S. to save my life and the life of my baby.

That’s the type of person who is coming to assert their right to asylum, to
get a fair hearing and they’re being blocked at those ports of entry. So,
another dimension and when Secretary Nielsen today said, well, they just –
if they would just come to the ports of entry, she knows very well the word
has gone out to slow-walk admission at those ports of entry.

So, the story gets worse the more we know at this policy horrific policy is
separating parents from their children.

O’DONNELL: Yes, we’ve actually seen video of what you’re talking about on
the border done by “The Intercept”. They did a great report of exactly how
they are standing right at that edge of the border to prevent the these
asylum seekers from getting two feet, getting both of their feet across
that line because technically, legally, and correct me if I’m wrong, but
the moment they get both of their feet across that line as asylum seekers,
they at that point cannot legally be turned away.

MERKLEY: Well, they can certainly be slow walked from there. Two weeks
ago, there were some 40 families sleeping on that bridge and they were
there because night after night, they’d say, well, you can’t get in the
door to the port of entry, and so they would wait day after day, and they
made quite a sight.

And so, with seven of us going down, they didn’t want that sight there.
So, therefore, they were stopping them at the middle of the bridge and we
even heard that it appears that the Mexican guards in the far end we’re
also checking papers, which is really rare. They don’t do that when people
are leaving a country or leaving Mexico to come to the U.S., as if they
might be working in cooperation.

We weren’t able to substantiate that because our team wouldn’t let us go to
the far end of the bridge, said if we did, we’d have to go through the
whole customs process and we wouldn’t have time for that. So, we couldn’t
even check out that piece. But it looked like there was a little bit of
cooperation across the border.

O’DONNELL: Senator Jeff Merkley, thank you for joining us tonight and
thank you very much for getting this the focus on this story. Really
appreciate it.

MERKLEY: You’re so welcome.

O’DONNELL: Kellyanne Conway used Catholicism, yes, Catholicism as a
justification for the new Trump policy of family separation and she lied
about the policy while she was using her Catholicism to justify that
policy. We’ll talk about that.

And the inspector general of the Justice Department today called the
president of the United States a liar, but he did it much more elegantly
than I do.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

O’DONNELL: The girls remain a mystery. Even the secretary of homeland
security isn’t sure what to say about what has happened to the girls who
have been separated from their parents at the southern border.

(BEGN VIDEO CLIP)

REPORTER: A couple of questions. One, why is the government only
releasing images of the boys who are being held? Where are the girls?
Where are the young toddlers?

KRISTJEN NIELSEN, DHS SECRETARY: I don’t know. I am not familiar with
those particular images. So, I have to –

REPORTER: You don’t know where they are? Do you know where the girls are?
Do you know where the young toddlers are?

NIELSEN: We have children in DHS care, both. But as you know, most of the
children, after 72 hours, are transferred to HHS. So I don’t know what
pictures you’re referencing.

REPORTER: They were released by your department. I mean, they’ve been
aired all over national television throughout the day, the kids who are
being held in the cages. We’ve only seen the boys.

NIELSEN: I will look into that.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: Joining the discussion now, Mariana Atencio, an MSNBC
correspondent who is live at the country’s largest immigration processing
center in McAllen, Texas. Also with us, professor Victoria DeFrancesco of
the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas. She’s also an
MSNBC contributor.

And, Mariana, I know there’s a little delay on our satellite connection
here but what do we know about the girls? That was one of the big
questions in Washington today. We haven’t seen any pictures of girls being
held. What do we know about where the girls are?

MARIANA ATENCIO, MSNBC CORRESPONDENT: We don’t really know at this point
all we have had access to as journalists is where these boys are which is
the images that we have seen from that facility in Brownsville in this
facility behind me.

Now, this is the epicenter of these family separations that are happening
over 1,100 children that have been separated from their families at the
Ursula processing center behind me here. But there’s been very little
access and that is part of the problem with this administration’s new
policy. I mean, today, you heard that “ProPublica” audio about these
children wailing inside one of these facilities. It is just with these
very little things that were just starting to get a glimpse at the trauma
that these children are enduring.

I was able to speak to some children who were separated from their parents
after they had been released from facilities like the one behind me because
the parents even though they crossed here illegally, they were not
prosecuted as zero-tolerance is still not operating at a hundred percent
capacity, and these children who I spoke to were separated for span of a
four or five day, six days. And when I asked them about their experiences,
they just started sobbing and would tell me these horrific stories of
sleeping on the floor, of not knowing where their parents were.

So, that is just what happened to a child over a span of five days. You
can just imagine when we talk about 2,000 children in the span of six weeks
who still don’t know where their parents are.

O’DONNELL: Victoria, it’s kind of surprising to hear the homeland security
secretary who’s supposed to be in command of all of this. Not to be able
to enlighten us really at all about what’s happening with the girls.

VICTORIA DEFRANCESCO, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PROFESSOR: Right, so there’s the
horror of the family separation itself but a second horror is the
logistical nightmare that we’re seeing. Everything has been thrown
together in a very short time period, so you have ICE under Homeland
Security having one entity, the initial intake and then under them, you see
them separating out children to the office of refugee resettlement under
HHS, and then the parents are going into the federal prison system.

Technically, there’s an alien registration number that they’re given once
they cross the border in their process by homeland security, but what
happens after that when they go to these different entities? We don’t
know. She herself, the head of homeland security didn’t know.

So, it’s this logistical nightmare. There has been no planning. And this
sadly is part and parcel of the Trump administration, these throw stuff
together.

But human lives are at stake here, families, babies being separated from
their parents and this isn’t even getting to the nightmare of the judicial
component. Once these folks are set to get their court date, we’re going
to have a tremendous backlog because we don’t have the judicial component
to deal with this as well.

O’DONNELL: And, Mariana, now that we we’ve seen some images of what what’s
going on inside these places, but now we have the audio today for the first
time, we’re able to listen to it and I have to say there’s – it’s – it’s
horrible to say this, but it’s not surprising that what you hear on that
audio of six-year-old girls and other kids that age are kids crying about
their mothers and their fathers. What did we expect to hear?

ATENCIO: It was honestly sickening to hear that audio, especially when you
hear agents inside hearing these children sobbing, saying things like, do
we have an orchestra here, all we need now is a conductor, instead of
consoling these children.

And when you’re talking about the logistical nightmare, we also need to
talk about the number of caregivers that are available in facilities like
the one behind me. According to our Jacob Soboroff who was inside, only
four people were really qualified to take care of children in a facility
that size and I go back to the conversations that I had today and really
for the past four days. I’ve been here since Friday. With these children
who were separated only for a couple of days, Lawrence, and they tell me
things like, you know, I was stripped of all of my belongings, even these
little wrinkled pieces of paper where they have the one phone number for
their aunt or uncle here in the United States.

These are kids that were brought here through no fault of their own and
also we have to emphasize the fact that these are children that are
traumatized not because they’re separated from their parents but this is
really trauma that begins in their home countries. I mean, they’re fleeing
for a reason the countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras. Two of
those were the murder capitals of the world at one point.

So, they’re already traumatized when they get here and then they have to
find out that they’re separated from their moms and dads for unknown
periods of time – Lawrence.

O’DONNELL: Mariana Atencio and Victoria DeFrancesco, thank you both for
joining us tonight. Really appreciate. Thank you.

Coming up, Donald Trump’s FBI director doesn’t think that special
prosecutors investigation is a witch-hunt and he had to say that today at
the Senate Judiciary Committee.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

O’DONNELL: The justice department’s inspector general called the President
of the United States a liar today in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing
but he did it in as polite away as possible as inspectors general tend to
do. The inspector general was there to testify about his investigation of
the FBI’s investigation of Hillary Clinton’s email. The inspector general
was asked about President Trump saying this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I think that the report
yesterday maybe more importantly than anything it totally exonerate
exonerates me. There was no collusion.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: And here is how Senator Patrick Leahy brought that up with the
inspector general in his testimony today.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. PATRICK LEAHY (D), VERMONT: But there’s nothing in the report that
says it exonerates the President from any question of collusion with the
Russians? It says nothing one way or the other, is that correct?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We did not look into collusion questions.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: Such a polite way of calling the President a liar.

Donald Trump’s FBI director Christopher Wray testified at that same hearing
today. Remember Donald Trump chose Christopher Wray to be the director of
the FBI after Donald Trump fired James Comey so he is in every sense Donald
Trump’s FBI director. And here is what Christopher Wray said about the
President’s constant tweets including the President’s tweet today that
Robert Mueller’s investigation is a witch-hunt.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CHRISTOPHER WRAY, FORMER FBI DIRECTOR: I do not believe special counsel
Robert Mueller is on a witch hunt.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: And some Republican senators were pretending to be shocked and
outraged that some FBI agents’ texts revealed that those FBI agents were
strongly opposed to Donald Trump’s candidacy for President during the
presidential campaign. How dare an FBI agent be against candidate Trump?
Here is Senator Lindsey Graham in full outrage today about those FBI
agents.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM (R), SOUTH CAROLINA: Here’s what Ms. Page said on
March the 4th, 2016. God, Trump is a loathsome human. How do you feel
about that? I mean, she is entitled to her opinion.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I think we laid out here why we were so concerned about
it.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: And here is that same Lindsey Graham offering his opinion about
Donald Trump during the Presidential campaign about the very same time that
those FBI agents were offering their opinions.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

GRAHAM: Looking back, we should have basically kicked him out of the
party. The more you know about Donald Trump the less likely you are to
vote for him. The more you know about his business enterprises, the less
successful he looks. The more you know about his politics, the less
Republican he looks.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: And here is Senator Cruz today just outraged by those FBI
agents.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. TED CRUZ (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: In late 2015 and in 2016, when
Mr. Strzok was in-charge, he used an FBI device to call President Trump a
quote “a-fing idiot,” although I don’t believe he abbreviated it, “a
loathsome human and a disaster.”

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Correct.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: An idiot and a disaster. Who would ever say things like that?

And here is Ted Cruz during the Presidential campaign at about the same
time that those FBI agents send those texts.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CRUZ: This man is a pathological liar. He doesn’t know the difference
between truths and lies. He lies practically every word that comes out of
his mouth.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

O’DONNELL: Many observers of Rudy Giuliani lately have thought perhaps he
might need some psychiatric help at the moment and his previous three wives
generally seem to agree he needs something like that. And now Rudy
Giuliani of all people is recommending that for other people. Let’s listen
to this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

RUDY GIULIANI, PRESIDENT TRUMP’S LAWYER: It’s an investigation made up of
a bunch of distorted human beings –

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Which ones?

GIULIANI: – who cry – FBI agents and prosecutors crying when Hillary
Clinton wasn’t elected. I think if I can get those pictures of them crying
instead of investigating President Trump, they should go to Belleview. We
want Hillary, what’s going to happen! I need a psychiatrist.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: Nothing crazy about that guy.

Now just for the record, I guess this has to be said. No FBI agents cried.
Rudy Giuliani is imagining that in his wild ravings.

Joining our discussion now David Frum, senior editor for the Atlantic and
the author of “Trumpocracy, the corruption of the American Republic.”

And David, the – there’s so much that the Giuliani and some Republican
senators today tried to extract from the idea that there were some members
of the FBI who thought Donald Trump was a very bad Presidential candidate.
So bad that they didn’t want him to be President. Like, of course, all of
those Republican senators are at that hearing today.

DAVID FRUM, SENIOR EDITOR, THE ATLANTIC: Well, I worked on Rudy Giuliani’s
2007-2008 Presidential campaign. And I still think he was a great mayor of
New York. But time catches up with all of us, I suppose.

I think what happened, there is – I believe an HBO or Netflix special in
which they show some people who are on the Obama campaign who were really
upset on the night that Hillary Clinton lost as you tend to be when your
person loses. And he may have miss-wired that TV special with what
happened in his head to those FBI agents.

O’DONNELL: And the clinging to the texts of the FBI agents in the
inspector general’s report is seems to be the only thing that Republicans
are trying to pull out of it. The inspector general’s report says that
there is no evidence that the agents involved ended up making decisions or
changing the direction of investigations based on their own political
preferences. And, in fact, the delay that is demonstrated in getting to
the Anthony Weiner laptop, there’s like a one-month delay, that delay hurt
the Clinton campaign very, very badly.

FRUM: Well, today is one of those days like when those cars try to pile
into too view lanes on the expressways. That there is that story – there
is another story I want to comment to your viewers and we are talking about
it just before. People must not mess at the Wilbur Ross story reported in
Forbes magazine. On any other day of the year, this would be the biggest
scandal of the day, of the week, of the month.

Wilbur Ross apparently has lied, not illegally. He didn’t break any laws
but lied about divesting himself of investment in Russian-linked –
Kremlin-linked companies and when he was asked about it by journalists,
shorted the stock and then five days later dives divested it, positioned
himself to buy it back. And when he did sold the stock, he did sell – he
sold it to his bank to hold in trust for members of his family. And I
really recommend people to read this Forbes story. It is going to get lost
but it’s really important.

O’DONNELL: Yes. And David, the reason why there is no criminal violation
there is that the intent to divest, which is all that he had expressed
earlier was that something that he did not do. And that’s not – you’re
not held to that intent to the point of criminal penalty.

FRUM: Well, one of the things we are going to discovery when all of this
is over, is we have a lot of laws about government integrity. They were
written in the 1970s on the assumption who served in government would be
affluent professionals. And they are not written to capture people of
complex webs of doubtful international holdings like Donald Trump and
Wilbur Ross. And we need to revisit the laws written in the ’70s for more
egalitarian society for less egalitarian society of the 21st century.

O’DONNELL: Yes. Wilbur Ross is actually the member of the administration
with the most complex and vast holdings around the world.

David Frum, thank you very much for joining us. Really appreciate it.

FRUM: Thank you.

O’DONNELL: Coming up, Donald Trump’s team has been using the bible and
Kellyanne Conway decided to use Catholicism to justify what Donald Trump is
doing to children on the southern border.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The sort of separation of kids from their families, the
lying about it. The putting of kids in cages I think is really
reprehensible. And I think religious leaders, you know, and people in
general need to say – to call it what it is, which is sin.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: In a country that enshrines separation of church and state in
the constitution, we never need to use religion to justifying a government
policy. But American politicians love to it. And the Trump administration
is doing it to justify their policy of child abuse at the southern border.

Attorney general Jeff Sessions has cited what he calls biblical
justification using a bible passage that was frequently used to justify
slavery. And now Kellyanne Conway has come along and pulled Catholicism
into this bite. At the same time that the Pope and the catholic bishops
and catholic priests have objected to what the President is doing to
children at the southern border.

Kellyanne Conway used it on usual preface to her comments yesterday in
which she repeated the Trump why that what is happening to children on the
southern border is the Democrats’ fault and not a direct order issued by
Donald Trump.

Here are the words Kellyanne Conway used to try to build credibility to her
lying yesterday. She said she was speaking quote “as a mother, as a
catholic, as somebody who’s got a conscience.”

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

KELLYANNE CONWAY, WHITE HOUSE COUNSELOR: As a mother, as a catholic, as
somebody who has got a conscience and wouldn’t say the junk that somebody
said, apparently, allegedly, I will tell you that nobody likes this policy.
You saw the President on camera he wants this to end. But everybody has –
Congress has to act.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O’DONNELL: And joining us now with the reaction, the most reverend Michael
Curry presiding the shoot (ph) of the Episcopal Church and father James
Martin, Jesuit priest and the editor-at-large of the Catholic Publication
America magazine.

And father Martin I’m going to go to you first simply because of Kellyanne
Conway’s invocation of Catholicism of your faith. I would like to get your
reaction to that.

FATHER JAMES MARTIN, SJ, EDITOR-AT-LARGE, AMERICA MAGAZINE: Well, I think
what she is saying absurd. I believe she has a conscience obviously, but I
think most people who see what’s going on in the border realize that their
conscience is telling them this is outrageous and it’s sinful. There’s a
reason why we are so outraged. It’s because God moves through our
consciences and tries to move us through action. So it’s sinful.

O’DONNELL: Bishop, your reaction.

BISHOP MICHAEL CURRY, PRESIDING BISHOP, THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH: Well, you
know, I just have to say that for those of us who are Christian, the
standard of our conduct and the standard of our life is Jesus of Nazareth,
probably one of the most compassionate people whoever walked the face of
this earth. And this Jesus tells us to love God, to love our neighbor and
that that is the fulfillment of all that God intends. Fulfills the law and
the prophets. And if that is the teachings of Jesus, for those of us who
are Christians, we are bidden to follow that. And separating children from
their parents is not loving your neighbor.

O’DONNELL: To the people in our audience who are not religious, have no
religion, to atheists, they can come to the conclusion that this is an
immoral act without any religious guidance whatsoever. And morality can be
found in certain positions without any religious guidance whatsoever or any
religious belief. How do you feel when you hear politicians using religion
to justify their choices like this?

CURRY: Well, it’s – it is immoral and it’s wrong. And it’s a misuse of
religion. The use of Romans 13, for example, to justify this action –
Romans 13 was used to justify slavery. It was used to justify Nazism in
Germany. Romans 13 has – but it was a misuse even of St. Paul.

But even with that said, for a Christian to quote Romans 13 over Jesus of
Nazareth, as if Jesus of Nazareth doesn’t exist, that, it seems to me, is
highly problematic, and it’s just flat-out wrong. It’s unbiblical. It’s
un-Christian and it’s un-American.

O’DONNELL: Father Martin, you have had your own experience working in
Africa with refugees at different points in the past. You have seen these
kinds of problems before. So what you are seeing on the southern border is
familiar to you.

MARTIN: Sure. I worked in Africa with refugees from all over the place
and settling in Nairobi, and I saw firsthand what it meant for these people
to try to find a new life and flee persecution. No one wants to be a
refugee. No one wants to be a migrant. But they do it out of great love
for their families. They have a lot of guts to do it. And I think it’s up
to us to welcome them.

As bishop was saying, Jesus himself says I was stranger and you did not
welcome.

It is pretty clear. I think the problem with a lot of these Christians who
are saying that they are reading the bible is I don’t know what bible they
are reading because the bible I read has Jesus always reaching out to those
on the margins, including and most especially migrants and refugees.

O’DONNELL: And Bishop, you captured the world with your sermon at the
royal wedding, and I wonder if you have considered delivering a sermon on
this subject.

CURRY: Well, I did just this past Sunday actually. Yes, and the truth is
I have a feeling pulpits across the land, similar sermons were preached.
Love your neighbor as yourself. Do unto others as you would have them do
unto you.

My question to all those who have a conscience, and I’m not questioning
that, but who may be supporting this policy, do unto others as you would
have them do unto you. That’s Jesus talking in Matthew chapter seven, the
golden rule, is this how you would want someone to treat a member of your
family? Is this how you would want your children?

I mean I’m a father of children. I remember one time our oldest daughter,
she was like two or three or something. We were in the store, and I turned
my head for just a split-second, and she wandered away into the little
clothing thing. I couldn’t find her. I panicked internally. Do we
realize that’s what parents are feeling when their children are being taken
away from them by our government? That’s not America. That’s not
American. We can do better than that.

O’DONNELL: Father Martin, what would you say to Catholics who hear
Kellyanne Conway say – used Catholism as her justification for the way she
views this?

MARTIN: I would say pay attention to your own consciences. There’s a
reason why when we hear these recordings of kids who are trapped in these
cages that it pulls at our heartstrings. There’s a reason why we see
pictures of kids being taken from their mothers and fathers why it disturbs
us. That’s our conscience.

And so, you know, Kellyanne Conway can say one thing but your conscience
says something else. So your conscience is where you listening to the
voice of God.

And also, just as bishop was saying, come to know Jesus. It’s pretty clear
what Jesus is saying in the gospels. I don’t know how much clear I you
could get that I was a stranger and you did not welcome me. And the
consistent message in the Old Testament and the New Testament is welcoming
and caring for strangers, period. If that doesn’t work, go back and read
the parable of the Good Samaritan.

O’DONNELL: To the point of conscience being the voice of God, and I just
want to again stress that this is the country where the constitution
separates church and state. And we all know, and I think we at this table
all grant that atheists have consciences too. And for them it is not the
voice of God. It is their own voice and their own conscience and their own
learnings about the world and their own morality that is telling them what
this is when they see it.

But, bishop, what would be – if you could get a second with the President,
what would you tell him about this?

CURRY: I would say to him, my brother, my brother, do good. Do what is
just. Do what is kind, and you will be following Jesus.

O’DONNELL: Bishop Michael Curry gets the LAST WORD on this tonight.

Father James Martin, thank you for joining us also. Really appreciate it,
both of you. Thank you.

Tonight’s LAST WORD is next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

O’DONNELL: Tonight’s last word goes to Alison Human (ph) of Valencia,
Madrid who is six years old. She traveled with her mother from El Salvador
to our southern border, where our border patrol separated her from her
mother. Alison memorized her aunt’s phone number in the United States.
Here she is on audio obtained by Pro-Publica, begging to be allowed to
speak to her aunt.

(VIDEO CLIP PLAYING)

O’DONNELL: Alison Human (ph) of Valencia, Madrid, gets tonight’s LAST
WORD.

The 11TH HOUR WITH BRIAN WILLIAMS starts now.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Tonight the haunting images and now audio of children
separated from their parents at the border. We are live in south Texas
with a look at what one pediatrician calls government sanction child abuse.


END

END

Copyright 2018 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are
protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the
prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter
or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the
content.>