World on Red Alert: Making China great again Transcript 1/2/18 The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell

Ezra Klein, Nicholas Kristof, Evan Osnos

Date: January 2, 2018
Guest: Ezra Klein, Nicholas Kristof, Evan Osnos


And as you can see, and as I think you know, when a guy takes too many days
off from work, this beard thing happens.

And Rachel, you know, it`s been out there on Twitter for or against the
beard. Got an overwhelming response. I think it was like two trillion in
favor of the beard and amazingly two trillion opposed to it.

So, it`s a tie that you have to break right here and now. You can tell me
what to do. And this will either be here tomorrow or not. It`s completely
up to you.

RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST, TRMS: I – well, I was going to say I`m 100
percent in favor of the beard. I am 98 percent in favor of the beard be, I
am 2 percent curious as to how it would look if it was just here. The
mustache down to the jaw line –

O`DONNELL: Rachel, you`re never going to know!

But listen, let`s get back to the story you broke earlier in the hour, the
Fusion GPS story.


O`DONNELL: And here it is, they`re just asking for full transparency about
what they have worked on and what they have revealed to the committee.

MADDOW: Yes. And we`ve sort of knew that was going to be an issue.
Because the first time that Glenn Simpson from Fusion testified, it was 10
hours before the Senate Judiciary Committee. And his lawyer put out a
statement after that saying this transcript is the property of the
committee. We expect that they may release it. Chuck Grassley was then
asked at an Iowa town hall by a constituent, it`s your committee. Will you
vote to release that transcript? He said essentially yes, essentially
after we clean it up and make sure nothing needs to be redacted.

We were able to report a few weeks ago that that redaction process was
complete. And so, it`s in Grassley`s hands if he wants to hold a vote in
his committee to release that thing. Fusion really wants that thing out
there. Obviously, it would be of intense public interest. It`s not in
their power to release it, but it`s hard for me to see why Chuck Grassley
wouldn`t now let that out into the public domain. He told his constituents
in Iowa he`d do so. And he hasn`t explained why he hasn`t.

O`DONNELL: And they do, as the Fusion people point out, they continue to
want to leak and try to publicly manipulate aspects of this story without
having the full disclosure.

MADDOW: Yes. And what Fusion is breaking in its own terms tonight in this
op-ed is a lot of really red hot information. They`re saying that they
told the Senate in August that the dossier wasn`t the basis for the FBI
investigation. Well, a lot of Republican senators who have been inveighing
against the dossier should probably have to answer for that if they had
that information.

They say they`ve given the committees information about Trump and his links
with Deutsche Bank, Trump and potential money laundering and foreign
business dealings. I mean, if they handed all the information over and
were willing to testify to it under oath, there will be intense public
interest if these transcripts can be released.

O`DONNELL: And, Rachel, also tonight, we have – and it`s always hard to
say, this is the craziest Trump tweet ever, but it`s certainly among the
most dangerous if not the most dangerous. President Trump basically
taunting North Korea about nuclear war, saying North Korean leader Kim
Jong-un just started – stated that the nuclear button is on his desk at
all times. Will someone from his depleted and food-starved regime please
inform him that I do have a nuclear button, but it is much bigger and more
powerful one than his and my button works?

Rachel, I give you the floor. I`m a bit speechless in reacting to that.

MADDOW: I don`t want the floor on this one. I mean, the president knows
the idiom that he is playing with here, right? I mean, when the Marco
Rubio issue with him criticizing the size of the president`s hands came up
in a presidential debate, it was because the president knew the Freudian,
you know – we know what he was talking about. And everybody was afraid he
was going to take his pants off in that debate in order to prove himself,

In this case, him saying to Kim Jong-il, mine`s bigger and mine works is
essentially begging Kim Jong-il to prove him wrong. And that`s amazing
psychology when you`re a grown man. But that`s really specific. Kim Jong-
un, excuse me. But that`s really dangerous when you`re talking about
nuclear weapons.

O`DONNELL: Donald Trump once again inadvertently making the case for more
women in government and more women in presidencies around the world.

MADDOW: And nuclear disarmament.

O`DONNELL: All those things at once. Thank you, Rachel.

MADDOW: Thank you, Lawrence.

O`DONNELL: Thank you.

And so, tonight, here we are at the beginning of what will be the year-long
50th anniversary of the year that changed America, the year that changed
American politics, 1968. It was a year like no other in our history,
especially our political history. It was a deadly year for the 16,589
Americans killed in the Vietnam War that year. And it was a deadly year on
the presidential campaign trail with the anti-war Democratic presidential
candidate Bobby Kennedy being assassinated when he seemed to be on his way
to winning the Democratic presidential nomination.

The Kennedy assassination came two months after Martin Luther King Jr.`s
assassination which rocked the country and rocked the presidential
campaign. And it was the year when the right wing in Republican politics
finally managed to coalesce around an acceptable candidate and win the
presidency. It is that same right wing that 50 years later has given us
President Trump. And in that 50 years, the American right wing has not
gotten any wiser.

And its candidate is now clearly the most dangerous person who has ever
occupied the White House. The first and only president who casually issues
threats of nuclear war on a whim, as the president did tonight in a tweet
that should have already activated the vice president and a majority of the
cabinet to remove the president as unfit to serve under the 25th Amendment.

That tweet, as I just read, says: North Korean leader Kim Jong-un just
stated that the nuclear button is on his desk at all times. Will someone
from his depleted and food-starved regime please inform him that I to too
have a nuclear button, but it is a much bigger and more powerful one than
his, and my button works?

Fifty years ago, you could get in serious trouble in this country by even
suggesting that you were willing to use nuclear weapons as one of the vice
presidential candidates did in the 1968 presidential campaign. I titled my
recent book about the 1968 presidential campaign “Playing with Fire”
because to some extent that`s what all the presidential candidates were
doing, some knowingly, and some unknowingly. But no one in presidential
history has ever played with fire more publicly and recklessly than Donald

Tonight, the president is threatening nuclear war with a country the size
of Pennsylvania. This is a level of madness never seen before anywhere in
the world. There has been open speculation about President Trump possibly
starting a nuclear war simply to distract attention from or to use as a
cover for dismantling the special prosecutor`s investigation of the
president. And no one can say that that is wild and irresponsible

As we enter the 50th anniversary of 1968, it is easier than it should be to
imagine 2018 being even worse than 1968, worse only because a profoundly
reckless man of questionable sanity is president of the United States.
Richard Nixon won the 1968 presidential campaign, and that is when he began
committing the political crimes that eventually led to his resigning the

In an interview with “Politico”, Richard Nixon`s counsel John Dean sees the
similarities between team Nixon and team Trump.


little they`ve learned about what went on in the past. They`ve – every
signal they have thrown from the get-go has been, we`re covering this up.
They`ve done nothing to try to really dispose of it. The whole attitude
has been we`re hiding something. And so, they – I can only conclude they
are hiding something.


O`DONNELL: Recent reporting by “The New York Times” reveals that the Trump
campaign adviser George Papadopoulos played a crucial role in the FBI`s
decision to open an investigation last year into the Trump campaign`s
contacts with Russia, opening that investigation while the campaign was
still going on. According to “The New York times,” during a night of heavy
drinking at an upscale London bar in May 2016, George Papadopoulos made a
startling revelation to Australia`s top diplomat in Britain. Russia had
political dirt on Hillary Clinton.

Court documents show that about three weeks earlier, a professor with
alleged Kremlin contacts told George Papadopoulos that the Russians had
dirt on Hillary Clinton in the form of thousands of e-mails. Following the
release of the hacked Democratic Party e-mails, Australian officials warned
their American counterparts about the information George Papadopoulos had
provided to this Australian diplomat.

As “The Times” reports, the hacking and revelation that a member of the
Trump campaign may have had inside information about it were driving
factors that led the FBI to open an investigation.

Now, when a large political organization like the Nixon administration or
the Trump campaign or the Trump administration is being investigated by a
special prosecutor, no one in that organization knows exactly who else in
that organization is in possession of the most damaging information. No
one in the Trump campaign or in the Trump Organization knows exactly what
everyone else knows or might know. And so, no one knows who the biggest
threats are, the biggest threats to Donald Trump himself.

Is Michael Flynn, who has already pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI a
bigger threat to President Trump than George Papadopoulos? How much does
Michael Flynn know? How much does George Papadopoulos know?

Here is John Dean again on that question of how much do they know.


DEAN: They didn`t know how much I knew. I knew much more than they
thought I did. Not that I was involved in it. But just I had picked it up
over the years of being there. And so, I became their worst nightmare.

And, you know, I was determined to end it once and for all and just clean
the whole thing up, when I did finally testify. With Flynn and his
proximity, he even had more proximity than did I. He could be a remarkable


O`DONNELL: A remarkable witness, their worst nightmare.

Joining us now: Ezra Klein, editor at large at “Vox” and host of the
podcast “The Ezra Klein Show”. Also with us, Jill Wine-Banks, former
assistant Watergate special prosecutor and an MSNBC contributor. And
Nicholas Kristof, Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist for “The New York

Nick, first, on North Korea, on the tweet tonight, you have been to North
Korea. You have been able to assess their reaction. I was going to say to
these kinds of things. But this is a whole new level of Trump tweeting
about North Korea.

So, what do you think the reaction is tonight in North Korea?

are always asking me to try to decode President Trump. They don`t
understand him. And I think this will add to the bafflement.

I mean, look, there are plenty of things that could go wrong in 2018. But
I think there is pretty broad agreement among international relations
specialists that the single thing that could be most disastrous would be a
war with North Korea. And in that context, it`s incumbent on both North
Korea and the U.S. to try to ease tensions, to bring them down.

And tweets like this essentially pour gasoline on that blaze. President
Trump is goading Kim Jong-un to test a nuclear missile again, to prove its
reliability to show him wrong. And fundamentally, I think it comes across
as two kindergartners who are jostling each other, except that each has
nuclear weapons.

O`DONNELL: Yes, and, Ezra, I just want to go to you on North Korea. We`re
going to talk about it more later in the program. But one more point on
this. The – Kim Jong-un had issued a statement that included some
positive indicators of opening of possible talks with South Korea all
around the Olympics and the possible participation of North Korea in the

So, that was a very positive element to what he said. He also said that
thing about his nuclear button. And so, the president of the United States
decided to react to the negative line and to ignore the positive – the
possible positive opening here.

EZRA KLEIN, EDITOR-AT-LARGE, VOX.COM: I don`t even know I would call what
Donald Trump did here decided to react. This is not a reasonable form of
reaction no matter what part of Kim Jong-un`s statement he wanted to
respond to.

I`ve said this before. I don`t think this kind of thing can possibly be
overestimated. We are not used to thinking in terms of risk as bad as
nuclear war. And one of the thoughts I keep coming back to under the Trump
administration is in this country, we have begun to overestimate the
dangers of impeachment and underestimate the dangers of a deranged
president retaining control over a nuclear hyper-power.

I don`t think we have an emotional pitch that is appropriate to this. But
this cannot happen. Like this is not something our civilization can
unleash just because we elected the wrong man.

O`DONNELL: Yes, Ezra, you have written about – aught authoritatively
about the impeachment process and a reconsideration of considering it.
Much more of a relatively routine step under certain circumstances, as it
is with federal judges and others who face it from time to time.

Jill Wine-Banks, I want to take you back to your days of investigating
President Nixon, who also had the nuclear codes in his pockets at all
times. Was there ever a moment like this where the world is wondering
tonight, might the president of the United States engage in a nuclear
exchange simply to distract or dismantle the special prosecutor`s

JILL WINE-BANKS, MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR: Lawrence, I don`t think there was ever
a moment until possibly the very end of the Nixon administration when it
was reported that Nixon was drinking heavily and having prayer meetings
with Kissinger that anybody thought that he would start a nuclear war to
divert attention from the investigation. That was never a possibility.

I don`t – I agree with what Ezra said, that possibly the danger of a
nuclear war is the greatest threat facing us when you have an unstable
president. That is something that we have to worry about. I also worry
about the possibility of basically a civil war of his supporters if
impeachment proceedings are not unanimously voted upon. If there is any
doubt, I`m afraid that there would be some real disruption from his

So, it`s a very different kind of climate now than it was at the time in
the `70s when there was actual bipartisanship in the Congress and there was
bipartisan support for the impeachment. And it was the Republicans who
went to the president and said, you will be convicted if you don`t resign.
That`s what led to the resignation was the Republicans telling the
president the evidence was overwhelming.

Now, we have very significant evidence. And over the weekend, much more
was developed. And as was said, I believe that Mueller must have a lot
more than anything we know. And there may be a lot coming.

O`DONNELL: And, Nick, to Jill`s point and to John Dean`s point, they
didn`t know what I knew. That has to be haunting Donald Trump right now.
And his tweet comes tonight after a devastating weekend of reporting for
him by your newspaper.


O`DONNELL: By “The New York Times” on this issue of Papadopoulos telling
the Australian ambassador in London that Russians had the dirt on Hillary
Clinton in the form of e-mails. That that might be something that the
president certainly didn`t know was communicated at that time. But if he`s
communicating that, if this campaign operative is communicating that to the
Australian ambassador in London, how could he not have communicated it to
his own campaign?

KRISTOF: I think that`s exactly the point. That we know that on around
April 26th, that George Papadopoulos learned that the Russians had
thousands of Hillary Clinton e-mails. What we haven`t known is whether or
not the Trump campaign knew that. But, you know, if this is being
discussed over drinks in London with Alexander Downer, then clearly
Papadopoulos is sharing that with other members of the Trump campaign,
which means they knew about those e-mails well before the DNC did.

And, you know, one other thing that I think squares the circle on this,
Jill was and you were talking about the nuclear issue under Nixon. James
Schlesinger, the secretary of defense at that time, at the very end of the
Nixon era, he gave orders to the military that if Nixon were to order a
nuclear strike on any country, that those should not be followed unless he
as defense secretary or unless Henry Kissinger confirmed that order because
he was afraid of Nixon issuing some kind of a nuclear strike.

This was completely unconstitutional, probably illegal. And yet it was
clearly the right thing to do. And I sure hope people in the Pentagon are
thinking along those line took place.

O`DONNELL: Yes, and, Ezra, that action was taken in regard to President
Nixon when the House Judiciary Committee was moving toward impeachment.
And so, the defense secretary could know that this is probably a temporary
condition that they`re under. And they might be moving on to the next
president very soon at that point.

KLEIN: Yes. This is the terrible position we`ve been left in. I mean,
you hear a lot of people ping for what would in effect be a soft coup for
the military itself, for the military men and generals around Trump to
reinterpret his orders to stand in the way of his orders.

And this goes back. I apologize to keep bringing it back to this. This
goes back to I think the importance of taking seriously, do we have the
right person in this position? When we begun discussing the possibilities
of a nuclear war based on schoolyard tweets, when we begun discussing the
possibilities of having military essentially abrogate the orders of the
duly elected commander-in-chief, at some point, the risks of removing the
person are not as bad as the risks of keeping them in office.

We`re either looking at the possibility of real civilization of disasters
or genuine convulsions of our system of government that could have very,
very difficult and very unexpected long-term consequences. So, these are
things we have to take very seriously. And I see a lot of looking for sort
of downstream triple bank shot ways of containing the damage instead of
just saying, listen, a person who tweets like this and speaks like this
given the kind of power they`re wielding has not taken that power
responsibly enough to continue wielding it.

O`DONNELL: And, Jill, when you got involved in the special prosecutor`s
investigation of President Nixon, impeachment was 100-year-old idea. It
had happened once 100 years before. But the Senate, you know, poured the
cold water on it and didn`t let the impeachment go through.

And, institutionally, you were up against a concept that institutionally
people in Washington could not really conceive of. They had no familiarity
with it. And it seemed as though in those days largely because of the
nuclear codes in the president`s pocket, we couldn`t play games with
something like impeachment. The president was too serious for impeachment
to any longer be relevant.

WINE-BANKS: I don`t think we thought in the special prosecutor`s office
much about impeachment in the beginning. Our job was to investigate
whether crimes had been committed. And we did have an extraordinary
witness with John Dean. And he may be right that Flynn or even
Papadopoulos or someone we don`t know about is an equivalent witness who
will be giving us the smoking gun information that`s necessary.

But we were looking at crimes. And it was only when we came to the
conclusion that crimes had been committed by the president that he could be
indicted if he was an ordinary citizen, that we had to consider is
impeachment or indictment the correct procedure? And what is the best
thing for American democracy. And we ended up going with – giving a
report to Congress that set forth a road map to impeachment, which was
really basically here are the crimes that have been committed. And the
House did in the Senate went forward, using that, and concluded that it was
an impeachable offense.

O`DONNELL: Jill Wine-Banks and Nicholas Kristof, thank you both for
joining us tonight. Ezra, please stick around.

Coming up, Donald Trump`s tweeting tonight is just one of the reasons why
so many foreign leaders and foreign diplomats around the world believe that
he is, quote, insane. That is a word that they are using in a new report.

Also, “The New Yorker`s” Evan Osnos will join us. He has been inside North
Korea. He will join us with what he believes is the reaction to tonight`s
tweet by the president.

And later, is Mitt Romney on his way to becoming Senator Romney, the junior
senator from Utah?


O`DONNELL: – of the night, Donald Trump has once again proved to the
world`s diplomatic corps that he is, in their words, insane. This guy is
insane. That`s what Susan Glasser reports, is the worldwide reaction to
Donald Trump in her new article in “Politico” magazine. Those words, “this
guy`s insane” came from some foreign diplomats based on their actual
private meetings with Donald Trump.

And tonight, the president who they consider insane tweeted this. North
Korean leader Kim Jong-un just stated that the nuclear button is on his
desk at all times. Will someone from his depleted and food-starved regime
please inform him that I too have a nuclear button, but it is much bigger
and more powerful one than his, and my button works?

That is exactly what diplomats and adults around the world consider insane.
And the Trump tweet comes just as there were signs of hope for possibly
better relations between North and South Korea. South Korean President
Moon has been hoping that the Winter Olympics in South Korea, quote, will
be able to promote the peace between the North and South Korea and become
an Olympics for peace.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in his New Year`s address yesterday said
North Korea`s participation in the Winter Games will be a good opportunity
to show unity of the people. And we wish the games will be a success.

In that same New Year`s Day address, Kim Jong-un also said a nuclear button
is always on my desk. This is reality, not a threat.

Joining us now, a reporter who has recently visited North Korea, Evan
Osnos, whose latest mandatory reading article in “The New Yorker” is
entitled “Making China Great Again” which focuses on the Chinese view of
President Trump.

Evan, thank you so much for joining us tonight. And first of all, I want
to get to your reaction to the president`s tweet tonight about North Korea.

Korea is that they follow his tweets to the syllable. They follow it in
real-time, incredibly closely. We`d wake up one morning in Pyongyang, and
analysts from the North Korean government had been up overnight responding
and thinking about it and trying to figure out what to make of the
president`s tweets. As they said to me, we can`t decide if he is
irrational or if he is too smart, which is to say they weren`t sure if this
was improvisation or this was part of a plan.

But what it does is something quite clear, which is that in the North
Korean political system where Kim Jong-un is young, he remains in many ways
still a vulnerable figure surrounded by older military and intelligence
figures, he has no choice but to respond to a personal provocation of this
kind, because if he doesn`t, then he risks his own domestic political
stability, his own survival politically and otherwise.

So, in a sense, this is not the kind of thing that a North Korean official,
a North Korean leader can allow to go unanswered. So, I`m afraid that we
are now back into this dynamic where instead of pointing us in the
direction of perhaps talks and negotiation, we can expect there is going to
be more of this tit for tat to come.

O`DONNELL: Evan, in your new extraordinary reporting in “The New Yorker”
about China and their reaction to Trump, you report they seem to have
figured out he is all bluster, he is as they put it, a paper tiger. And
all of his threats about China during the campaign have proven to be false.
And he has turned out to be the best thing that they could have hoped for
in an American president, especially after pulling the United States out of
the Trans Pacific Partnership and then not going through with any of his
other threats, because that actually helps China, pulling out of the Trans
Pacific Partnership, but then not going through with any of his other
threats about China.

OSNOS: Yes, they were actually initially very worried about Donald Trump.
When he emerged on the scene as the Republican front-runner and then he was
elected, they were shocked. They thought he was their mortal enemy as
somebody put to it me. And then they conclude over the course of the next
several months that, in fact, he was as a Chinese military general said in
an internal speech to the Communist party, he has been a great gift to
China, because what he has done is pulled out of the TPP, which was
designed to contain or at least limit China`s commercial sort of growth in
the region.

And he has cleared the space for China to redefine Asia around its own
commercial and economic objective. So, in literal terms, China has its own
alternative to the TPP, which it created called the RCEP, Regional
Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which if it is, in fact – if it`s
approved as people expect later this year, it will be the largest trading
bloc in the world. And the United States will not be a part of it.

So, we have by pulling out, we have really sort of cleared the way for

O`DONNELL: So, is this a moment where China says to North Korea, look at
our experience. Look what he said about us, raping the American worker, to
use Donald Trump`s phrasing during the Presidential Campaign. And look how
Trump doesn`t do anything negative to us. Might China teach North Korea to
not pay attention to what Donald Trump says in these situations?

OSNOS: Well, China is in an awkward position because they don`t trust Kim
Jong Un, frankly. He has never visited Beijing. He`s never had any face to
space meeting of any kind with the Chinese leadership. But frankly, they
also don`t trust Donald Trump and increasingly they see evidence that
Donald Trump is not like the Presidents that they`ve dealt with before in
any sense of the word.

What they want is to try to prevent Donald Trump from using military action
in North Korea. But any attempt that Donald Trump might take to try to
build some sort of strategic partnership with China so that we could
address the North Korean threat together, every time he does something like
this, it undermines confidence in Beijing that he is a reasonable person to
deal with. So it makes harder to find some sort of negotiated solution.

O`DONNELL: Evan quickly, South Korea`s reaction to this tweet tonight,
just as they were warming to South Korea over the Olympics.

OSNOS: Well, this is exactly the worst thing that South Korea could have
had happen. They thought they were edging towards some sort of deal in
which North Korea might participate in the South Korean Olympics. They
wanted Donald Trump to take a moment to step back from hostilities. And
instead, this is in a sense actually Lawrence, this is sort really sort of
achieving what the ends of Kim Jong Un`s speech was intended to do which
was to drive a wedge between South Korea and the United States.

O`DONNELL: Evan Osnos, thank you very much for your invaluable perspective
on this, having been inside North Korea and your latest extraordinary
reporting in The New Yorker on making China great again. China`s view of
Donald Trump. Evan, thank you very much, appreciate it.

OSNOS: Thanks, Lawrence.

O`DONNELL: Coming up, Mitt Romney warned the Republican Party about Donald
Trump last year. And now Mitt Romney might be planning to take his
opposition to Donald Trump to the United States Senate as the next Senator
from Utah.


O`DONNELL: Tonight with the President of the United States casually
tweeting possible threats of nuclear war with North Korea. Donald Trump is
behaving exactly as many observers last year warned he would behave, as an
unhinged President. One of the people warning the Republican Party about
Donald Trump last year was former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney.

Today Mitt Romney changed the location of his twitter bio from
Massachusetts to Utah after Utah`s Senior Republican Senator Orrin Hatch
announced he will not run for reelection. Today a source close to Mitt
Romney told MSNBC that it is highly likely Romney will run for that Senate
seat. And that top Romney aides have been putting pieces in place for a
campaign. Here is what a switch in Utah from Senator Orrin Hatch to Senator
Mitt Romney could mean for President Donald Trump.


ORRIN HATCH, UNITED STATES SENATOR: Mr. President, I have to say that
you`re living up to every – everything I thought you would. You`re one
heck of a leader. We`re going to make this the greatest presidency we`ve
seen, not only in generations, but maybe ever.

is very, very smart. I`m afraid that when it comes to foreign policy, he
is very, very not smart. He is not of the temperament of the kind of
stable, thoughtful person we need as leader.

His imagination must not be married to real power. Dishonesty is Donald
Trump`s hallmark. Donald Trump is a phony, a fraud. His promises are as
worthless as a degree from Trump University.


O`DONNELL: Joining us now, Josh Earnest, former White House Press
Secretary for President Obama and an MSNBC Political Analyst. Also joining
us Max Boot, Senior Fellow for National Security Council on Foreign
Relations and a Foreign Policy Adviser from Mitt Romney`s 2012 Presidential
Campaign and josh, here we are once again on something you could not
possibly have conceived of when you were working in the Whitehouse, a
President tonight casually tweeting about the possibility of nuclear war
with North Korea. And indeed, encouraging that possibility.

JOSH EARNEST, MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR: Well, Lawrence, we typically have relied
on American Presidents to actually be a stabilizing influence in the
international community. And when faced with the responsibility of
protecting the American people, we have a stockpile of nuclear weapons in
place and ready and maintained around the clock by highly trained
professionals to protect the United States so that we don`t have to use
them. Not actively threatening to use them against other people.

So this is obviously a stark departure from bipartisan tradition and is
genuinely destabilizing around the globe. And certainly does heighten the
risk that the American people face. And it`s deeply disturbing.

O`DONNELL: Max Boot, I`ve known Senator Hatch a very long time and worked
in the United States Senate when he was there. I never had an uncomfortable
or negative moment with him in fact. Watching him there in the rose garden
saying that Donald Trump could be the greatest President ever. I don`t
believe I have ever seen an 82-year-old Senator more lost. Talk about his
possible successor in that seat, Mitt Romney, who you know well, and what
that would mean in the United States Senate.

MAX BOOT, MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR: Well, I think it will certainly be an
important change in the dynamics of the Senate. I mean I think it`s still
a little bit early to know how it`s going to shake out because remember
that two of the more caustic critics of Trump in the senate, Jeff Flake and
Bob Corker are going to be leaving the Senate. So but now you have the
possibility of Mitt Romney basically stepping into their shoes and being a
voice of moral authority and challenging the outrageous conduct of
President Trump in a way that Orrin Hatch and most of his Republican
colleagues simply refuse to do.

You played the clip earlier from 2016 of the very eloquent denunciation
that Orrin Hatch gave of Donald Trump. And you know what? Looking back on
it, he was right in every single particular. Everything he said about
Donald Trump has come to pass, the lying, the irresponsibility, the
misogyny, the grandiosity, the egomania.

Everything he diagnosed about Donald Trump. Donald Trump has shown himself
to be time and again. And I trust and hope that Senator Hatch, if he in
fact becomes Senator – if Senator Hatch is replaced by Senator -

O`DONNELL: Romney, yes.

BOOT: By Senator Romney, that he will continue to speak out and not allow
his voice to be silenced in a way that it seems like perhaps it has been to
some extent since he briefly had that flirtation with becoming Secretary of
State for President Trump.

O`DONNELL: And josh, we know if Mitt Romney does make the run, and if he
makes it basically as an anti-Trump candidate, that doesn`t look like a bad
idea in Utah where he is way ahead in polls there for this possible seat.
There was an October poll showing Mitt Romney at 44 percent for that as a
possible successor for that seat. And, Josh, when you look at that tweet
tonight from the President, it was close to 8:00 p.m. when he did it.

And the first thing I wondered was, OK, what time does the Whitehouse Chief
of Staff leave? What time does he go home at night? What time do the
adults, if we can call them that in the Whitehouse, go home at night to
solve the President can feel free to do this?

EARNEST: Lawrence, it does seem the President has been left to his own
devices with his iPhone and is in a situation in which he is tweeting
things that are destabilizing and dangerous and certainly don`t reflect the
tradition and values and norms that people like H.R. McMaster and John
Kelly have dedicated their careers to protecting. And certainly they
understand how those norms are critical to America`s National Security.
And they just have not succeed in impressing the current Commander in Chief
about the value of protecting that kind of conduct.

But Lawrence, when it does come to Mitt Romney, the one thing I do think
it`s important for people to keep in mind, while I do think Mitt Romney`s
approach to serving in the Senate is likely to be different than the
approach that Senator Hatch has brought. What is notable to me is even
people like Jeff Flake and Bob Corker and Ben Sasse, who have chosen
moments to be outspoken and critical of President Trump, they have not
proved to be a particularly effective check on President Trump.

They have voted to confirm a large number of people to lifetime
appointments on the Federal bench, the vast majority of them white men.
Many of them, at least some of them have been singled out as actually not
being particularly well qualified or well suited to those positions. They
supported repeal of Obamacare.

They supported this tax cut bill that is going to give a significant
windfall to corporations and wealthy people at the expense of working
people and our national deficit. So I think the real question is going to
be is Senator Romney going to be somebody who does more than just talk, but
actually use the authority that we give to individual United States
Senators to stand up and serve as a check on President Trump? Lots of
democrats have been willing to do that, but we have not seen Republicans be
willing to do that this far.

O`DONNELL: Let`s put that question to somebody who has known Mitt Romney
and has worked on the Romney campaign. Max Boot, two things. First of
all, Will Mitt Romney run for Senate? What`s your prediction on that
knowing him as you do? And secondly, will he be the kind of Senator that
Josh Earnest just described?

BOOT: I mean I think all indications are that he probably will run. In
terms of what kind of Senator he is going to be, I do think you have to
realize that Mitt Romney is a pretty conservative guy. So he`s not
necessarily going to disagree with Trump on every single thing because you
know where Trump takes kind of a conventionally conservative positions I
suspect that Romney will vote along with him which is the kind of behavior
you could expect.

But I also think that Romney, assuming he gets into the Senate, will not
hesitate to criticize the outrageous conduct of President Trump that goes
beyond any kind of policy. And that simply is kind of bizarre behavior that
you see today, for example, with his nuclear taunting of Kim Jong Un. And
I think that you know Mitt Romney could be a critical voice in the Senate
for another respect as well because you know what happens if the Democrats
take control of the House in November, which now seems a likely occurrence.
One would think that impeachment proceedings would be the order of the day.
And of course then it would be up to the Senate to pass judgment on – on
the articles of impeachment.

And have I the utmost confidence that Senator Romney, assuming there is a
Senator Romney, would be completely fair and neutral in judging the
evidence. And if he feels that President Trump has in fact violated his
oath of office, has in fact committed high crimes and misdemeanors, I would
imagine he would vote his conscience and vote to remove him. And frankly,
that`s something that would be very hard for me to imagine something like
Senator Hatch to be doing.

O`DONNELL: Max Boot and Josh Earnest, thank you both for joining us
tonight, really appreciate it.

EARNEST: Thanks Lawrence.

O`DONNELL: Coming up, what the Trump administration was doing while the
president was playing golf.


O`DONNELL: Donald Trump is now the golfiest President in history. He has
played more golf than other Presidents have even dreamed of. And while
the President was playing golf during this holiday vacation, some in the
Trump Administration found ways to stay busy. Three days before Christmas,
the Interior Department reversed an Obama Administration decision and
renewed expired leases for a Chilean Mining Company for a copper and nickel
mining operation near Minnesota`s boundary waters canoe area wilderness.

Now the man who owns that Chilean Mining Company also owns the home that
Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner rent in Washington, D.C so guess who he had
to lobby to get that from the Trump Administration? On Christmas Eve, the
New York Times reported the Trump Administration is scaling back the use of
fines against nursing homes that harm residents or place them in grave risk
of injury.

And on December 29th, the administration announced new regulations
weakening offshore drilling safety measures designed to prevent another
deepwater horizon oil horizon oil spill which killed 11 workers on that oil
rig and so from endangering the lives of workers to endangering the lives
of nursing home residents. Someone in the Trump administration is always
trying to get away with somebody that they hope voters don`t notice. Up
next, more from Ezra Klein on the dirty little secrets in the Trump


O`DONNELL: Ezra Klein is back with us and it seems while the President
golf`s, someone in the Trump administration is always doing the dirty work.

EZRA KLEIN, MSNBC CONTRIBUTOR: I`m not sure it`s all that different when
he`s not golfing. My sense of the way the Trump Administration works is
someone else is always doing the work. Donald Trump does a lot of
tweeting, a lot of meeting. But he is more less led to the conclusion
people want him to have, he signs on to other people`s agendas. But yes
probably there`s a lot going on behind the headline news.

And one of the things that people have been talking about, the Washington
Post had a good piece touching on this and others have as well is the
unbelievable gutting of the Federal Government below Trump. This doesn`t
get a ton of front headline coverage but we have a huge turnover in the
administration. Burking (INAUDIBLE) said it`s been the highest turnover in
the first-year presidency ever.

We`re seeing a huge number of jobs go unfilled with the bureaucracy. We`ve
seen a huge number of jobs that are political appointments go un-appointed.
When people leave jobs they`re not getting replaced. There`s been a
tremendous brain drain from the State Department.

These are things that is the government`s quality and ability do its work
degrades that we`re going to be feeling for a very long time. Losing this
amount of talent out of the government is something that`s going to hurt us
in ways that we cannot currently predict for much beyond the life cycle of
the Trump Administration itself. I think it deserves a lot more coverage
it`s been getting.

O`DONNELL: Ezra Klein, thank you very much for joining us. appreciate it.

KLEIN: Thank you.

O`DONNELL: Tonight`s last word is next.


O`DONNELL: The last time I appeared on this program it was actually
Thursday night by phone to tell Ari Melber who was hosting the show that we
had just broken over the $16 million mark in raising money for the K.I.N.D.
Fund, kids in need of desks. That`s for kids in schools in Malawi where
they have never seen desks. We have those desks made in factories in
Malawi by workers in Malawi, delivered to those schools as you see there.
We also include a scholarship fund for girls to attend high school in
Malawi where the girl`s gradation rate is half the gradation rate for boys.

And so that was last Thursday night when i talked about that new total. And
since then, you kept giving even though Christmas was over. You kept
giving, as did I online, and since Thursday night over the New Year`s
holiday we have raised an additional $584,488 bringing this year`s total so
far to $2,286,372.

And, as I said, the total from the beginning of this program seven years
ago is now $16,635,304. I want to thank all of you for participating in
this and helping us so consistently. Many of you have been repeat givers
and that`s why this has worked so well. It`s your continued support and the
support of Andy Lack who is the chairman of NBC News and MSNBC and Phil
Griffin who is the President of NBC. without their continued support this
program, the K.I.N.D. Fund would not exist. I want to thank them for
everything they`ve done to keep this going. But most of all, thank you for
your generous giving that has continued.

I want to read some of your tweets but I`ll do that tomorrow night. That`s
tonight`s last word. The 11th Hour starts now.


Copy: Content and programming copyright 2018 MSNBC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Copyright 2018 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.