The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell, Transcript 09/30/15

Guests:
Jonathan Alter, Howard Dean, E.J. Dionne, Michael Steele, Jonathan Allen
Transcript:

RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST: That does it for us tonight, we will see you
again tomorrow, now it`s time for THE LAST WORD with Lawrence O`Donnell,
good evening.

LAWRENCE O`DONNELL, MSNBC HOST: Thanks Rachel, your reporting on these
death penalty drugs for more than the last year has just been
extraordinary and no one`s covered it the way you have.

MADDOW: Oh, thank you for saying so, I appreciate it, thanks, Lawrence –

O`DONNELL: Thanks, Rachel –

MADDOW: Thanks.

O`DONNELL: We have new information tonight about who arranged the Pope`s
meeting with Kim Davis.

And Republicans spent the day criticizing the President for what`s
happening in Syria, but none of them would say what they would do in Syria,
except Donald Trump.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: A significant show of force from Russia in its alleged
fight against ISIS.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: But U.S. officials say the targets are anti-Assad
rebels.

SEN. JOHN MCCAIN (R), ARIZONA: We are seeing the true intentions of
Vladimir Putin.

HILLARY CLINTON, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE: Russia and Iran and their
proxies want to keep Assad in power.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: That approach is tantamount to pouring gasoline on the
fire.

JOHN KERRY, SECRETARY OF STATE, UNITED STATES: It is imperative to find a
solution –

DONALD TRUMP (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: The question was asked of me,
why don`t you tell us exactly what you`re going to do in Syria? I said, I
don`t want to tell you.

MITT ROMNEY (R), FORMER PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I will support the
Republican nominee. I don`t think that`s going to be Donald Trump.

REP. KEVIN MCCARTHY (R-CA), HOUSE MAJORITY LEADER: Everybody thought
Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: A surprising admission about the Benghazi
investigating committee.

MCCARTHY: We put together a Benghazi special committee. What are her
numbers today? Her numbers are dropping.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The dumbest statement I`ve –

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yes –

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Heard since 47 percent –

EUGENE ROBINSON, COLUMNIST, WASHINGTON POST: Classic definition of a
Washington gaffe, which is accidentally telling the truth.

CLINTON: Demonstrates unequivocally that this was always meant to be a
partisan political exercise.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I would have slugged the guy –

(CROSSTALK)

I would have wait in case –

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You know –

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: At the end of the day that saw Russia`s first 20 combat flights
over Syria, Secretary of State John Kerry met with Russian Foreign
Minister, Sergey Lavrov.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SERGEY LAVROV, FOREIGN MINISTER OF RUSSIA: We agreed that the military
should get into contact with each other very soon.

But we all want Syria democratic, united, secular; Syria, which is a home
for all ethnic and confessional groups, whose rights are guaranteed, but we
have some differences as for the details on how to get there.

JOHN KERRY, SECRETARY OF STATE: It is one thing, obviously, to be
targeting ISIL. We`re concerned, obviously if that is not what is
happening.

We also agreed that it is imperative to find a solution to this conflict
and to avoid escalating it in any way.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: The Russian military action in Syria provoked Republican
attacks on President Obama in the Senate, beginning as usual on military
matters with John McCain.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MCCAIN: It`s time that President Obama woke up to the realities in the
world and re-assert American leadership. And that does not mean that we`re
going to send thousands of ground troops back into Iraq or Syria.

But it does mean that we develop a policy. What we should be saying to
Vladimir Putin is that you fly, but we fly anywhere we want to, when and
how we want to and you better stay out of the way.

That`s the message that should be sent to Vladimir Putin.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: The Republican chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee appeared on “Meet the Press” daily to criticize the president.
But like John McCain, he could not come up with a single specific policy
recommendation of his own.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CHUCK TODD, MODERATOR, MEET THE PRESS: If President Obama came to you,
called you up – and I know you guys have good personal relationship – and
he said, what would you recommend Senator Corker I do right now in response
to this?

SEN. BOB CORKER (R-TN), CHAIRMAN, SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS:
So, that`s a great question, and of course, we`ve gotten to the place where
it`s very difficult to even get a good answer.

And I recommended and voted for us hitting them back in 2013 in August,
early September –

TODD: By the way, you were –

CORKER: I can now –

TODD: One of a small minority, by the way –

CORKER: Well, he –

TODD: On both sides of the aisle –

CORKER: Asked for it, he asked for it and I supported. I believe you
support the commander-in-chief when he lays down a red line.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: Today, the frontrunner for the Democratic presidential
nomination, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

CLINTON: I don`t think it`s clear yet what Russia is really up to. From
what I have heard, they may or may not be targeting known ISIS refuge
positions.

They may be going after Assad`s enemies and claiming that it`s ISIS.
That`s the problem that we`ve got now in Syria. There are so many players,
so I think what President Obama has tried to do is to keep the focus on
where it needs to be.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: And the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination
said this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: So, you have ISIS that wants to take on Assad. So we`re fighting
ISIS, but we want to fight Assad. Why don`t you let those two fight for a
little while –

(LAUGHTER)

And take over the remnants, right? I mean –

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: Joining us now, Howard Dean, former Vermont governor and former
Chairman of the Democratic National Committee.

Also with us, Jonathan Alter, columnist for “The Daily Beast” and an MSNBC
analyst, and E.J. Dionne, opinion writer for “The Washington Post” and an
MSNBC analyst.

Jonathan Altar, starting with the last commentator there, Donald Trump, why
not just let them slug it out?

JONATHAN ALTER, COLUMNIST, DAILY BEAST: Well, you know, that was our
policy during the Iran-Iraq war, which went on for years, which was
essentially – let them both lose.

But Russia has complicated that strategy. And I think they have confounded
the Obama administration which did not expect that Russia would do this.

When it became involved militarily, I think they assumed that at the
beginning, they would join them in fighting ISIS.

But we know tonight from the late reports, that they are bombing positions
in the Hamas region of Syria that are held by moderate opponents of the
Assad regime, not ISIS.

They are bombing U.S. allies inside Syria. So, Putin has double-crossed
the administration and you can see why, you know, inside the White House,
they might be taking the Trump view.

Which is, let`s just wash our hands off this and let them – let them fight
it out without our involvement.

O`DONNELL: Let`s listen to what more of what Trump said tonight in New
Hampshire about Putin.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: So now we have Putin, said I`m going into Syria and I`m going to
knock the hell out of ISIS, he said, and I`m saying what`s so bad with
that? You know, is there anything wrong with that? That`s OK, it`s all
right.

But I also say, we want to be strong, we can`t let him push us around.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: Howard Dean, you could spend all day trying to find a
Republican who would tell you what to do next in Syria, that there`s no way
none of them are coming up with that.

HOWARD DEAN, FORMER VERMONT GOVERNOR: There are some things that have to
be done. And – because we can`t just let them “fight it out”.

There`s literally hundreds of thousands of civilians being killed. And
it`s also creating an enormous crisis in Europe, which is a problem. I
think it`s time for a no-fly zone and we may have to confront the Russians.

I personally think that unless you confront the Russians in their backyard,
they`re going to back off, Syria is not their backyard. So, there are
parts of Syria which are reasonably peaceful.

But we ought to put a no-fly net over those as we did in Kurdistan and
after the – after the – Saddam gassed thousands of them. And we`re going
to have to get involved, I don`t think we should have ground troops in.

The moderate – so called moderate Syrians, I think Obama was right not to
get involved with that because all the arms we sent over there were going
to end up in somebody else`s hands that mean us harm.

But this is a huge problem and it`s time to intervene for humanitarian
reasons because it`s a solution to the European refugee crisis.

O`DONNELL: Go ahead, Jon.

ALTER: I just – man, I don`t get about that is that, if you apply a no-
fly zone, you`re basically going eyeball to eyeball with the Russians.

We`ve given them essentially a green light to get involved militarily.
It`s pretty hard for us now to say, no, not only can you not become
involved militarily, but we`re going to enforce a no-fly zone.

DEAN: See, I don`t think we –

ALTER: Then you really are talking about a possible –

DEAN: I don`t think we gave them a green light because –

ALTER: They should –

DEAN: We gave them a green light to attack ISIS, but I don`t think we gave
them a green light to do worse to his own – I mean, you know, Assad has
been chlorine-bombing these people.

Now Russia is bombing the hell out of civilians is what he`s doing. And I
just don`t see how we can put up with that.

And I think, as I said before, my calculation about the Russians is, if you
take them on in their backyard, they`ll be tough.

If you take them on in an interest which is really their interest – it`s
the only thing they understand, Jonathan. We can talk all we want to
Lavrov, he lies every day, Putin lies every day, there`s nothing you can do


ALTER: And they lied on this, they said they were going to –

DEAN: They absolutely –

ALTER: ISIS positions –

DEAN: And they lie on Ukraine and they lie and they lie. So, people like
that only respect force.

I don`t advocate attacking the Russians, but I do advocate carving out a
safe zone for Syrians so we ,A, can deal with the European refugee crisis.

And ,B, so we can at least have some part of Syria which is reasonably well
governed and immune from the kinds of attacks that you see –

(CROSSTALK)

ALTER: This could be becoming a crisis in U.S.-Russia relations, it`s
escalating –

DEAN: All right, we`ve had a crisis in U.S.-Russian forces for three years
and nobody has done anything about it.

O`DONNELL: E.J. Dionne, have you heard a proposal today that sounds like
the route worth taking going forward?

E.J. DIONNE, COLUMNIST, WASHINGTON POST: Well, I think the reason no one
can come up with a really good option is, there is no really good option in
Syria.

There`s never been a great option in Syria. I mean, you know what the end
game has to look like. There has to be a negotiation that eventually gets
Assad out of power and that guarantees rights to the various peoples of
Syria.

It`s a lot of people cobbled together in one country, a different religious
orientations within Islam. But getting there is very nearly impossible.

And Jonathan is right, the Russians really did double-cross us, it looks
like they were bombing the free Syrian army who are the people probably
closest to us in Syria.

And so I think that the administration has to push the Russians back away
from this policy. But that will not – that will not be easy.

The question is, what is Putin really in this for? Is he really trying to
prop Assad up for the long run? Is he trying to strengthen him for the
short run for negotiations, or is he doing this mostly for domestic
reasons?

He`s got a slew of problems back in Russia, and he wants to tell the
Russian people, see, I am making Russia important again in the world, but
where does that play out in the long run in Syria? It`s not clear to me, I
got to say.

O`DONNELL: Donald Trump made news tonight on the humanitarian side of this
crisis; the refugees who are fleeing that area.

He had a message for any of the refugees who managed to make it into the
United States. Let`s listen to that.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: Now, I hear we want to take in 200,000 Syrians, right? And they
could be – listen, they could be ISIS, I don`t know. Did you ever see a
migration like that?

And I`ll tell you right now, and I`m putting everybody on notice, and
hopefully this gets outside of this room and I guess it will with all these
crazy cameras going back there.

I`m putting the people on notice that are coming here from Syria as part of
this mass migration, that if I win, if I win, they`re going back, they`re
going back. I`m telling you, they`re going back.

(APPLAUSE)

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: Jonathan Alter, that was his biggest cheer in that crowd
tonight.

ALTER: Well, you know, as he would say, that disgusts me. I mean, has he
ever heard of the Statue of Liberty. You know, these are suffering people,
these are not terrorists and they face enormous hardship.

This country has been about welcoming refugees from violence. Would that
have been his view when Jews who were suspected of being communist were
fleeing Nazi, Germany?

There were Americans in Congress who argued that, no, we can`t let the Jews
in, in the 1930s, they might be communists. Who cares that they`ve been
suffering.

And this is a really degrading contribution to our political dialogue.

O`DONNELL: That`s going to have to be the last word on this segment.
We`re out of time, Jonathan Alter, thank you very much for joining us
tonight.

Coming up, Mitt Romney says Republicans won`t pick Donald Trump as their
nominee because basically they`re not crazy.

And Hillary Clinton responds tonight to Republican house leader Kevin
McCarthy, saying that the Benghazi committee hurt her in the polls.

And we have new information to report about who arranged the Pope`s meeting
with Kim Davis in Washington last week.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

O`DONNELL: Well, they huffed and they puffed for weeks but they did not
blow the house down. The house voted today 277 to 151 to fund the
government for two months, ending the threat of a government shutdown over
the funding of Planned Parenthood.

The Senate passed the same bill 78 to 20. That bill funds Planned
Parenthood in full. President Obama said this about the shutdown this
afternoon.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BARACK OBAMA, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: The good news is that it
looks like the Republicans will just barely avoid shutting down the
government for the second time in two years.

That`s somewhat low bar, but we should celebrate –

(LAUGHTER)

Where we can. The bad news is that it looks like Republicans will just
barely shutting – avoid shutting down the government again for the second
time in two years.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: Up next, Mitt Romney versus Donald Trump.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: Mitt Romney let us down. He let us down. Something happened to
him the last month, he choked, he choked like a golfer, he can`t sink that
last putt.

We all know, right?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes –

TRUMP: Something happened to him, that was an election that should have
been won.

ROMNEY: I will support the Republican nominee, I don`t think that`s going
to be Donald Trump.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: Idiot is the word that most frequently comes to mind as a one-
word description of the frontrunner for the Republican presidential
nomination.

According to a new “USA Today” Suffolk University national poll. The words
that most frequently came to mind about Donald Trump were idiot, and its
synonyms, jerk, stupid, dumb, followed by arrogant, then crazy nuts and
buffoon, clown, comical and joke in that order.

Mitt Romney said today that he thinks the idiot, jerk, stupid, dumb,
arrogant, crazy, nuts, buffoon, comical, joke is hurting the Republican
Party.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ROMNEY: Yesterday, he said that some of the things he said about other
candidates have been childish. I think that`s probably a fair
characterization coming from him.

I think it`s unfortunate to have had the kind of personal attacks that
we`ve seen in the – in the process. But I think the 11th commandment was
quickly lost in this race.

And that I think, it makes it harder for us in the general.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: The “USA Today”, Suffolk University national poll shows Donald
Trump leveling off 23 at percent, Ben Carson at 13, Carly Fiorina 13, Marco
Rubio, 9 and Jeb Bush down to 8.

Joining us now, Alex Wagner, who was suppressing laughter mightily during
that introduction, the MSNBC analyst Michael Steele, former RNC Chairman
and MSNBC political analyst, also back with us, Howard Dean.

So Alex, when your one-word association –

ALEX WAGNER, MSNBC HOST: So good.

O`DONNELL: Leads with idiot, how far can you go?

WAGNER: I just want the trucker hat, that says idiot, dumb, buffoon,
clown, whatever else. That needs to be the sort of answer to the make
America great again – trucker hat.

What`s weird is that there was overlap between people who wanted Donald
Trump to be the Republican nominee and people who said he is a dumb, clown,
buffoon, idiot.

And that is the sector of people I don`t understand at all. What`s maybe
terrifying about that poll, Lawrence, is if you tally up Ben Carson`s
support, Carly Fiorina`s support and Donald Trump`s support, that is 49
percent of the Republican electorate.

O`DONNELL: Yes –

WAGNER: And you look at those numbers, you know, you have establishment
candidates polling in the single digits.

And no matter how badly the donor class and the establishment want Marco
Rubio or John Kasich or Jeb Bush to be their nominee, it is hard to imagine
how they are going to draw double-digit strength in a field like that.

O`DONNELL: Well, the Republican establishment happens to be here in person
tonight, Michael Steele –

(LAUGHTER)

MICHAEL STEELE, FORMER CHAIRMAN, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE: Oh –

O`DONNELL: Michael, I want you to listen –

STEELE: That is the last thing that I am –

O`DONNELL: I want you to listen to the real Mr. establishment, Mitt
Romney, his reasoning for why Donald Trump will never be the nominee.
Let`s see if you agree with it. Let`s listen to Mitt Romney.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ROMNEY: My party has historically nominated someone who is a mainstream
conservative. And someone who has a foundation in foreign policy that
gives people confidence that they can guide the ship at stake in troubled
waters.

Mr. Trump over the weekend, I think on “60 Minutes” said that he thought
it`d be a good idea to let ISIS take over Syria and then we could pick up
the pieces.

And I thought that was both absurd and dangerous. And I just don`t think
that, that`s – that kind of proposal is likely to lead him to become our
nominee.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: Michael, your reaction to Mitt Romney?

STEELE: Well, he`s absolutely right. That`s exactly what the party has
typically done. But this is not a typical time in the party and that is
part of the frustration that a lot of rank-and-file Republicans and the
establishment level have what`s going on.

They can`t control this, Lawrence, they have no idea what to do with this.
And each day, Donald Trump is gaining the insight of himself that he can
become the next president of the United States.

You saw that a little bit in how he rolled out his piece on the – on tax
proposals. You know, he actually went to notes and took questions
reasonably well.

And so there`s a danger now, we`re at a tipping point almost, where Donald
Trump has to break through the ceiling that he`s reached in his numbers,
23 percent, 22 percent.

And if he does that, as we get closer to this primary, the establishment is
going to be looking at Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Kasich sitting in single-
digit numbers, wondering, how do they get close to him?

How do they do that? Show me the pathway to that point. And that`s the
frustration that they have. And you heard it expressed optimistically or,
you know, at the end of the day, we`re going to get to that point.

I`m not so sure we get there anytime soon. And then if we do, and when we
do, is it too late?

O`DONNELL: You know, I – the rational that Mitt Romney gave for how you
get to a Republican nominee is the one that I`ve always used.

And been always confident in using that one, and so it`s never really hard
to predict. It was going to be Mitt Romney, it was going to be John McCain
when his time came.

But you know, Howard Dean, precedent controls politics until it doesn`t –

DEAN: Right –

O`DONNELL: Until the –

DEAN: Right –

O`DONNELL: Table gets upset and a new precedent gets set. Is that what`s
happening? –

DEAN: So, we`re –

STEELE: Yes –

DEAN: It`s very early, we`re all speculating. What I`m waiting for – a
really smart reporter to do is write a story about the organizations that
these folks have. Because we don`t know anything – they can be at –

O`DONNELL: Yes –

DEAN: Thirteen 13 percent of the polls, if they can`t get the vote out in
Iowa, it doesn`t make any difference.

STEELE: Yes –

DEAN: So, that`s number one. It`s too early to talk like this. Number
two, though, is, Republicans changed their rules in order to have a
smoother primaries if they didn`t have all the stuff going on.

Well, it turned out what they did was later in the – in the – I mean
early on, these are not winner take all states –

O`DONNELL: Yes –

DEAN: Anymore. So, if you think people go in there with 39 percent or the
49 percent of the vote together, they can blow everybody else out of the
water.

And then later, it goes to winner takes all. So, if you have one of these
folks being the frontrunner and they get in a divided field, 35 percent of
the vote, they`re going to get every single delegate from that state.

So that militates in favor of Trump or Fiorina or Carson, what we don`t
know is, where is their organization? I want – well, I want the
establishment press to go and look and find what they`ve got for –

WAGNER: But –

DEAN: Organization.

WAGNER: I will –

ALTER: Haven(ph) –

WAGNER: Question whether the establishment press – I mean Donald Trump
seems to be a bellwether for the power of the establishment press, right?

He is in the media all the time –

O`DONNELL: Right –

WAGNER: Therefore that explains his support. Ben Carson is a rejoinder to
that. Ben Carson exists in conservative radio and conservative media
channels that didn`t exist in 2008 and maybe even in 2012.

And that explains his support. So which is it? Is it that the
establishment press has disproportionate control over the Republican
nominating process or is it, it doesn`t at all?

But I mean, I feel like you have two examples at one and two that are –
all right, that are almost –

DEAN: Yes, but then –

WAGNER: Usually –

DEAN: All I`m asking for a substantive article telling me what their
chances really are. And we can`t know unless –

O`DONNELL: Michael –

DEAN: We know what their organization looks like.

O`DONNELL: Michael Steele, what do we know about their on-the-ground
organizations in the early states?

STEELE: I`m glad you brought that up and Howard Dean has it exactly right.
As a former party chairman, he knows that at the end of the day, what this
is all about, and this is about delegates.

It is not about national polls, it is not about how popular you are or how
bright and shiny your objects happen to be. It is about your organization
on the ground.

Which is why Jeb Bush is not worried. All of this hand-wringing about Jeb
Bush, his days are over and you know, this is a problem for him.

Jeb Bush is laughing his tail off right now because Jeb Bush is doing the
one thing and concentrating on the one thing that matters.

Organization on the ground, it doesn`t matter to him if he wins Iowa or
not, he`s got a long ball play exactly why – because of what Howard said.

Come March 1st of next year, everything is winner take all. You`re going
to have, Lawrence, probably two or three different winners in the first,
out of the first four primaries in caucuses.

No one person is going to sweep through those first four states. So, the
organization on the ground is important which is what Donald Trump has been
concentrating on.

Despite what people have to say, and this is a good story, you got to look
at that organization and he`s getting it, there`s no doubt about it.

O`DONNELL: All right, before we go to our break, I just want to play the
word game one more time on this “USA Today”-Suffolk poll.

Unfortunately, they didn`t do with all the candidates, they just did it
with one other Republican candidate. One other Republican candidate and
Alex Wagner, you`re the contestant here.

Here is the first group of words associated with this candidate; smart,
intelligent, knowledgeable. Here`s the second group of words associated
with this candidate; dishonest, liar, untrustworthy. Who is this
candidate?

WAGNER: Carly Fiorina.

O`DONNELL: Correct, you win it. Howard Dean, thank you very much for
flying in tonight.

(LAUGHTER)

Coming up, Hillary Clinton responds to House leader Kevin McCarthy, saying
that the Benghazi committee hurt her in the polls.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

O`DONNELL: On 9/11, the speaker of the house was helicoptered away from
the Capitol to an undisclosed location. The speaker of the house is the
second in line of succession to the president after the vice president.

Air Force I took the President from Florida to Nebraska on 9/11 to keep him
out of danger until Washington was safe. The Vice President was locked in
a bunker below the White House. And, the speaker of the house was safely
helicoptered, as I said, to an undisclosed location.

All of that done to preserve the office of the presidency. The speaker of
the house is the second most important elected official in the Washington.
The speaker of the house is usually then a seasoned veteran of the house,
who has slowly worked all the way up to the speakership. Not anymore.

50-year-old Kevin McCarthy, a nine-year veteran of the house is the least
experienced speaker – future speaker, in over a century. He will be the
next speaker of the house, and he is already the worst public speaker the
speakership has ever had.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MCCARTHY: Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But,
we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are
her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she is
untrustable. But no one would not known any of that had happened –

SEAN HANNITY, FOX NEWS HOST: I agree. I give you credit for that.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: That was future speaker, Kevin McCarthy, 24 hours ago on Fox
News reducing the Benghazi investigative committee to nothing other than a
mission to lower Hillary Clinton`s poll numbers. Hillary Clinton responded
in an interview with Al Sharpton.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

HILLARY CLINTON, (D) PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I knew the ambassador that we
lost in Benghazi. Along with him, we lost three other brave Americans, who
were representing us in a very dangerous part of the world. There have
already been eight investigations in the congress, one independent
investigation.

We have learned, all we can learn about what we need to do to protect our
diplomats and our other civilians and we need to be enforcing and
implementing those changes, which is what I started and what Secretary
Kerry has continued.

So, when I hear a statement like that, which demonstrates unequivocally
that this was always meant to be a partisan political exercise, I feel like
it does a grave disservice and dishonors, not just the memory of the four
that we lost, but of everybody who has served our country.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: There is already a fire McCarthy movement among republicans,
led by former Georgia Republican Paul Brown. But, it is not because of how
Kevin McCarthy publicly undermined the credibility of the Benghazi
committee. It is because he is not conservative enough.

Joining us now is Jonathan Allen, the Chief Correspondent for Voxx.
Jonathan Allen, this was what Hillary Clinton was hoping for. She could
not have hoped for it in her wildest dreams that the future speaker would
simply reduce it all to the whole point of the committee being to knock
down her poll numbers.

JONATHAN ALLEN, VOXX CHIEF POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT: The entire Republican
Party in Washington has spent the entirety of the Benghazi committee`s
existence, denying the idea that it is a political Witch Hunt, intended
only to prevent Hillary Clinton from being president.

And, Kevin McCarthy, the guy who is about to become speaker of the house,
walks out and says, “You know what? It is actually all about politics.”
He could not have said anything worse for us republicans.” And, not only
is it bad in that broad sense. It is also bad in the narrow sense that she
is going to testify in a few weeks.

And, now those republicans on the committee, they are in a box. To the
extent that they wanted to turn it into a political sideshow, they can.
Everybody is going to be watching for that. They are going to call foul
when it happens. This was a huge blunder by McCarthy and often as gaffes
are – this was a revolution of the truth.

O`DONNELL: Michael Steele, it sounds like the Republicans could not have
given Hillary Clinton a bigger gift before her testimony on October 22nd.

STEELE: I cannot disagree with that. It is stunning that the one thing
that, you know, since the early hours after the revelations of what
happened in Benghazi, republicans have always tried to keep this above the
political quagmire but at the same time dragging right into it.

And, I think that the words that were used to describe the work of this
committee – I mean the chairman cannot be happy right now. He is going to
– As was just pointed out, hold these hearings, have the secretary there.
And every word, every utterance is now going to be framed in the minds and
consciousness of the people listening in terms of politics. And that
undermines the effort all together.

O`DONNELL: Alex Wagner, in our previous hour, Rachel Maddow showed this
clip – this set of clips of Kevin McCarthy misspeaking on every other
sentence. And, these sentences were written for him.

WAGNER: Right.

O`DONNELL: And, they contained mistakes apparently both in the writing and
the speaking. Speaker is the singke worst title you could give to this
man, apparently.

WAGNER: I think we are not saying is this was not a gaffe in so far as
Sean Hannity was pressing Kevin McCarthy.

O`DONNELL: No. No.

WAGNER: This was something Kevin McCarthy planned to say on Fox News
including the word untrustable. I mean, so in that respect, Lawrence, I
think it is sort of like the Houston we have a problem issue with regards
to this man being the speaker of the house.

But, I will say, you know, to say that this revealed the Benghazi committee
is a political action committee, effectively, this is not news to most
people who have been following the select committee on Benghazi.

It has always been a political endeavor from the beginning of John
Boehner`s announce of who would be on it complete with a graphic showing
all the people who were going to be on your select committee on Benghazi.
This was always a political Witch Hunt.

We just now have actual confirmation that it is. Does it actually change
anyone`s opinions on the validity of their findings? I think that, that
remains to be seen. I think republicans who want to see this go forward
will be excited that it continues to go forward. Democrats who have been
skeptical will still be skeptical.

O`DONNELL: Jonathan Allen, what did it do for Hillary Clinton`s
supporters? I would imagine, this would give them kind of a new life and a
new energy about this.

ALLEN: I think they are absolutely hoping that this is the turning point,
the break they have been waiting for, undermine not only the committee but
some of the findings that will poison the fruits of that tree. It has been
said, but Kevin McCarthy gave them a huge gift.

And, just one other thing, that the idea that Kevin McCarthy is not
conservative enough, you mentioned earlier that some republicans are saying
that. I mean this is a guy who does not really have a discernible
ideology. He is extremely aimable, but is not somebody you would say he is
one of those rock rib conservatives.

He is a politician and he is as you pointed out rocketed to the top very
fast with very little experience. Has not run a committee in congress, and
I think it is going to be a real test for him to see if he has the
discipline to not make these kinds of mistakes.

O`DONNELL: Michael Steele, quickly before we go, it seems hard tonight to
predict a long run for Kevin McCarthy as speaker.

STEELE: Yes. You know, I do not know about that. I do not know how long
it will be, but I know conservative, the Tea Party conservatives in
particular are going to be very antsy about his early steps. This
certainly does not help those early steps.

You are going to see for the majority leader post and other leadership
posts, conservatives wanting to put their imprimatur in terms of the
personnel they are going to be in those roles. It is going to be a very
tough battle particularly, as you noted earlier, going to December, with
another vote on shutting down the government. So, good luck.

O`DONNELL: Michael Steele, thank you very much for joining us tonight.

Coming up, another quiz for Alex Wagner. I do not want anyone to see your
answer. Write down for me who you think has – which presidential
candidate has the most online contributors. And, I do not want to ruin the
suspension for the audience, so just write it down there, and I will see if
it is true.

Actually, we will hold up your answer in the next segment to show that she
wrote it down. Yes. OK, there it is. All right, we are going to be right
back with the answer.

(MUSIC PLAYING)

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

O`DONNELL: Hillary Clinton still has more support than Bernie Sanders in
national polls of democratic voters. Bernie Sanders now has more online
campaign contributors than any other candidate for president, democrat or
republican. And, that is exactly who Alex Wagner guessed had the most
support in online contributors, right there. You cannot read that, right?
Trust me, it says Bernie Sanders.

Today, just hours before the close of the third quarter fundraising window,
the Sanders team announced that it is the first 2016 presidential campaign
to receive one million individual online donations. The Sanders campaign
hit this mark faster than Barack Obama did in either of his campaigns.

Despite the record number of online donors, Bernie Sanders is still
trailing Hillary Clinton in actually dollars and cents. Tonight, “The
Washington Post” reports that Bernie Sanders pulled in $24 million this
quart per.

Hillary Clinton`s campaign says she raised $28 million this quarter. In an
interview earlier this week with David Axelrod, President Obama`s former
chief campaign`s strategist, Bernie Sanders said he hopes to keep his
campaign positive.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. BERNIE SANDERS (I-VT), DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I have
never run a negative add in my life, how is that?

DAVID AXELROD, PRES. OBAMA`S SENIOR ADVISOR: Yes. Well, that is pretty
remarkable.

SANDERS: Yes, in this day and age –

AXELROD: You feel you will get through this whole campaign without running
one? –

SANDERS: Well, I surely hope so. I surely hope so.

AXELROD: That is not a yes or no, though.

SANDERS: Well, it is my hope that I will never run a negative ad. I never
have after all of these years. But you know, we will see.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: Alex Wagner, congratulations on another win around of the quiz
show tonight. I find it stunning that Bernie Sanders is so close to
Hillary Clinton on total dollars raised. That makes it a very unimpressive
outcome for Hillary Clinton. She is the one that everyone said had the
giant fundraising capacity.

WAGNER: You talk to certain democratic operatives and there is not an
emerging consensus, but maybe the beginning of an emerging consensus that
Bernie Sanders may win Iowa.

O`DONNELL: Yes.

WAGNER: And maybe even New Hampshire 37 and for the Hillary Clinton
campaign, that is a damning – that is a damning emerging consensus. I
will also say the person that is watching all of this transpire with very
perked ears and keen eyes is Joe Biden.

O`DONNELL: Yes.

WAGNER: In “New York Times,” there is a story this evening written by Amy
Chozick and Maggie Haberman saying that Clinton campaign has now began
reaching out in earnest to donors and strategist. Democratic operatives
trying to shore up support against a potential Joe Biden run. This is not
good. And, for many, many democrats who presumed that at the end of the
day, it will be Hillary is race to lose. I mean this is very cold comfort.

O`DONNELL: Alex Wagner, reading tomorrow`s “New York Times” tonight, we
call that cheating on this show.

(LAUGHING)

WAGNER: We never do that, Lawrence.

O`DONNELL: Jonathan Allen, this is one of those things, where the Clinton
campaign has all insisted and they can still insist that they have a
firewall in South Carolina, if Bernie Sanders does take Iowa, if he does
take his neighboring state of New Hampshire. And, they have been doing
some spinning, indicating that they could live with that, they will take
control after New Hampshire.

ALLEN: Yes, that was – I feel like we could be running this episode of
“The Last Word” in 2008. This within spin of like, you know, “we are going
to lose this state, we are going to lose that state, but we are going to be
OK and we got 50 state running. And, at the end we are going to win
because we are the big machine.”

Now, I will say this. Until Bernie Sanders shows that he can win Latino
voters, that he can win African-American voters, who remain largely with
Hillary Clinton, I think it is hard to see how he builds a coalition in the
big states. And, particularly, you were talking earlier with Howard Dean
about delegates.

When you look at democratic delegates, they are clustered around cities in
the big states – and particularly in African and American and Hispanic
parts of the state. So, you know, we are talking about a situation here
where Bernie Sanders has not broken through that wall.

And, as long as he does not, Hillary Clinton probably ends up winning the
nomination. But, It is not good for her that he is at $24 million in the
last quarter and she is at $28 million in the last quarter. Those numbers
are moving in the wrong direction for her.

O`DONNELL: Another surprising fundraising number that came out, Ben
Carson, $20 million. With Bernie Sanders and Ben Carson raising that kind
of money, we are starting to – they are starting, absolutely, to defy all
previous conventional wisdom on where the money goes in these campaigns?

WAGNER: Ezra Klein has a great piece in Voxx that talks about the
question, the existence of the establishment. And, we have long thought
that, that only effects sort of media, right? Ben Carson is an example of
a grassroots campaign that – and Bernie Sanders to a certain degree, too.

It is not just media, it is also donors and the question is, are we
actually beginning to see the changing of the landscape that we have been
long predicting on a host of other levels, independent of politics. Is it
now finally affecting the political arena? Is 2016 the year that all bets
were off?

O`DONNELL: And, Jonathan Allen, you could never – the candidacies like
this I do not think could have raised this kind of money before the
internet age. In the old days, when you had to do it through direct mail
if you were trying to do that kind of fundraising, that was very expensive.
And, you know, compared to doing it on line.

ALLEN: Absolutely. I mean you had Howard Dean on earlier, he pioneered
this in 2004. The first real online donation candidate fuelled his
campaign until, obviously, it ended in Iowa, basically.

O`DONNELL: Jonathan Allen, and winner Alex Wagner.

(LAUGHING)

WAGNER: Cheater. Cheater.

ALLEN: Can we both be winners?

O`DONNELL: No. No.

ALLEN: Cheater/winner belongs to me, John.

O`DONNELL: Jonathan, this is not little league. You do not all get the
trophy, OK?

ALLEN: Alex Wagner is the Trumping candidate.

O`DONNELL: It`s Alex`s night.

WAGNER: Make America great.

(LAUGHING)

O`DONNELL: Thank very much. Coming up, we have new information on who
arranged that meeting between the Pope and Kim Davis.

(MUSIC PLAYING)

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

O`DONNELL: We have news tonight in the fatal shooting of Eric Harris in
Oklahoma. You will recall that occurred in April when a volunteer deputy,
74-year-old, Robert Bates says he accidentally shot and killed Eric Harris.
He claimed that he was reaching for his taser but used his handgun instead.

Robert Bates has been indicted for second-degree manslaughter, and he has
pleaded not guilty to that. But, a grand jury in Oklahoma has now indicted
Tulsa County Sheriff Stanley Glanz for not providing documents and covering
up evidence in an internal investigation of that shooting.

Today, Sheriff Glanz announced his resignation. The grand jury indicted
Sheriff Glanz on two misdemeanors in the investigation related to his
friend, the volunteer deputy Robert Bates.

Coming up, new information on exactly who arranged for Kim Davis to meet
Pope Francis.

(MUSIC PLAYING)

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

O`DONNELL: And, now for the very good news, “The Last Word” family has
expanded since Monday night, when I told you that in our first five years
of this program, “The Last Word” family has had three babies with three on
the way. Well, now they are only two on the way, because, Ava arrived
today on her due date.

Ava is 7 pounds, 11 ounces. Her mom and dad Swan and Todd could not be
happier. Welcome to “The Last Word,” Ava.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

KIM DAVIS, ROWAN COUNTY CLERK WHO REFUSED TO ISSUE SAME-SEX MARRIAGE
LISENCE: It was really humbling to even think that he would want to, you
know, meet me or know me.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: The Vatican has confirmed that the Pope did meet with Kim Davis
in Washington. She says her meeting with the Pope validates everything she
has done.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DAVIS: He said stay strong. That was a great encouragement. Just knowing
that the Pope is on track, you know, with what we are doing and agreeing,
you know, kind of validates everything.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O`DONNELL: In a statement, a Vatican spokesperson said, “I do not deny
that the meeting took place, but I have no further comments.”

Back with us, E.J. Dionne. E.J., now, this story was breaking before we
went on the air last night, and I did not see anything in it that looked
like confirmation to me. And, so, I kept refusing to do it within the
hour.

It also made no sense to me that of all the people in the 50 United States
to work through that filter to get into a room with the Pope, it made no
conceivable sense to me that Kim Davis would be one of them, but now we
know it happened.

DIONNE: Right. It still makes no sense. What happened, as I understand,
it is that this meeting was not arranged by the American bishops. In fact,
I am told there was a lot of opposition to this meeting among the American
bishops.

It was arranged by the Vatican Nuncio, I am told, Carlo Maria Vigano. The
Vatican Nuncio is the ambassador. That is consistent with reports that say
the meeting was arranged by a Vatican official, and the meeting itself
happened at the Nuncio, the Vatican Embassy.

Archbishop Vigano has known as a cultural conservative. He was named by
Pope Benedict. He is scheduled to leave in January, but there is talked
that American Bishops would like him to leave earlier. This may hasten his
departure. And, I think the Vatican is going to have to say more about
this, because so many conclusions are being drawn from this.

And, it flew in the face of everything the Pope was saying here. I mean,
yes, he has talked a lot about religious liberty. The conservatives here
were quite happy, he visited with the little sisters of the poor. They did
not expect this meeting. But, he did not talk about same-sex marriage as
such.

He was fighting against culture wars. So, they have a lot of explaining to
do about this meeting. And, you know, I hope they do just make public that
yes, it was the Nuncio who arranged the meeting.

O`DONNELL: And, E.J., you know, I was wondering, were there 100 people in
the room? Were there 200 people in the room? Did the Pope know who
everyone was? Well, Kim Davis` lawyer says, it was a private meeting just
for Kim Davis. If that was the case, then the Pope had to be told, why he
was meeting with this woman.

DIONNE: Right. And, the question is, as a friend of mine said today, who
has been following this, the Pope does not read the American newspaper.
So, he may have known only the version that was given to him by whoever
arranged this meeting.

You know, as I say, I think – I am pretty sure – I am quite sure it is
Archbishop Vigano. But, it is a very troubling thing given the rest of his
message. So, I agree with piece – A lot of people are making a great deal
out of the Pope`s answer to ABC`s Terry Moran on the plane, suggesting the
Pope really embraced her view of conscientious objection. I do not see how
you get that out of his answer on that plane.

O`DONNELL: Well, we are getting a lot closer to it as this information
develops. But you are right, we have to get more from the Vatican. E.J.
Dionne, thank you very much for that new information tonight. I really
appreciate it. Chris Hayes is up next.





END

Copyright 2015 CQ-Roll Call, Inc. All materials herein are protected by
United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed,
transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written
permission of CQ-Roll Call. You may not alter or remove any trademark,
copyright or other notice from copies of the content.>