President Donald Trump addresses the Nation. TRANSCRIPT: 1/8/19, The Rachel Maddow Show.
CHRIS HAYES, MSNBC HOST: Rachel, it`s been great to have you here on ALL
IN. Come by any time.
RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST: It`s a strange news day but nice to be here
with you, my friend.
HAYES: All right. We are less than two minutes from this president`s
primetime address in the Oval Office, and so, “THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW”
starts right now.
MADDOW: I want to thank all of you at home for joining us. Very happy to
have you with us.
Let me give you a sense how the next hour is going to go.
President Trump`s first primetime address from the Oval Office will start
momentarily. We are expecting it to be short, under ten minutes.
Then, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Senate Democratic Leader Chuck
Schumer are going to give a rebuttal on behalf of the Democratic Party.
That should follow quickly after the president`s speech.
After that, here this hour, we`re going to have some expert help in sorting
out the claims made in those various speeches. We will also hear from
freshman Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who`s going to be joining
us live for his first interview on this show.
But we also tonight are going to be talking about the tons of news that
broke today that I think the White House was hoping would be wiped out by
this primetime speech. The Russian lawyer who offered Donald Trump Jr.
dirt on Hillary Clinton and then met with Trump campaign officials in Trump
Tower during the campaign, she was indicted today. Lawyers for the
president`s campaign chair Paul Manafort today accidentally revealed a spy
novel`s worth of new details about Manafort`s links to Russia. There were
two plot twists under seal involving special counsel Robert Mueller,
including one twist from the Supreme Court today.
We`re going to be covering all of that over the course of the hour. That
all happened today, just as the news cycle is jammed up with tonight`s
presidential first, his first primetime Oval Office address.
Here is the president live from the Oval Office. Again, we believe this
will be about 10 minutes.
DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: My fellow Americans,
tonight, I`m speaking to you because there is a growing humanitarian and
security crisis at our southern border.
Every day, Customs and Border Protection agents encounter thousands of
illegal immigrants trying to enter our country. We are out of space to
hold them, and we have no way to promptly return them back home to their
America proudly welcomes millions of lawful immigrants who enrich our
society and contribute to our nation, but all Americans are hurt by
uncontrolled illegal migration. It strains public resources and drives
down jobs and wages. Among those hardest hit are African-Americans and
Our Southern border is a pipeline for vast quantities of illegal drugs,
including meth, heroin, cocaine, and fentanyl. Every week, 300 of our
citizens are killed by heroin alone, 90 percent of which floods across from
our southern border. More Americans will die from drugs this year than
were killed in the entire Vietnam War.
In the last two years, ICE officers made 266,000 arrests of aliens with
criminal records including those charged or convicted of 100,000 assaults,
30,000 sex crimes, and 4,000 violent killings. Over the years, thousands
of Americans have been brutally killed by those who illegally entered our
country and thousands more lives will be lost if we don`t act right now.
This is a humanitarian crisis. A crisis of the heart, and a crisis of the
Last month, 20,000 migrant children were illegally brought into the United
States, a dramatic increase. These children are used as human pawns by
vicious coyotes and ruthless gangs. One in three women are sexually
assaulted on the dangerous trek up through Mexico. Women and children are
the biggest victims, by far, of our broken system.
This is the tragic reality of illegal immigration on our southern border.
This is the cycle of human suffering that I am determined to end. My
administration has presented congress with a detailed proposal to secure
the border and stop the criminal gangs, drug smugglers, and human
traffickers. It`s a tremendous problem.
Our proposal was developed by law enforcement professionals and border
agents at the Department of Homeland Security. These are the resources
they have requested to properly perform their mission and keep America
safe. In fact, safer than ever before.
The proposal from Homeland Security includes cutting edge technology for
detecting drugs, weapons, illegal contraband and many other things. We
have requested more agents, immigration judges and bed space to process the
sharp rise in unlawful migration fueled by our very strong economy.
Our plan also contains an urgent request for humanitarian assistance and
Furthermore, we have asked Congress to close border security loopholes so
that illegal immigrant children can be safely and humanely returned back
Finally, as part of an overall approach to border security, law enforcement
professionals have requested $5.7 billion for a physical barrier. At the
request of Democrats, it will be a steel barrier rather than a concrete
wall. This barrier is absolutely critical to border security. It`s also
what our professionals at the border want and need. This is just common
The border wall would very quickly pay for itself. The cost of illegal
drugs exceeds $500 billion a year. Vastly more than the $5.7 billion we
have requested from Congress. The wall will also be paid for indirectly by
the great new trade deal we have made with Mexico.
Senator Chuck Schumer, who you will be hearing from later tonight, has
repeatedly supported a physical barrier in the past along with many other
Democrats. They changed their mind only after I was elected president.
Democrats in Congress have refused to acknowledge the crisis and they have
refused to provide our brave border agents with the tools they desperately
need to protect our families and our nation.
The federal government remains shut down for one reason and one reason
only, because Democrats will not fund border security. My administration
is doing everything in our power to help those impacted by the situation,
but the only solution is for Democrats to pass a spending bill that defends
our borders and reopens the government.
This situation could be solved in a 45-minute meeting. I have invited
congressional leadership to the White House tomorrow to get this done.
Hopefully, we can rise above partisan politics in order to support national
Some have suggested a barrier is immoral. Then why do wealthy politicians
build walls, fences, and gates around their homes? They don`t build walls
because they hate the people on the outside but because they love the
people on the inside.
The only thing that is immoral is the politicians to do nothing and
continue to allow more innocent people to be so horribly victimized.
America`s heart broke the day after Christmas when a young police officer
in California was savagely murdered in cold blood by an illegal alien, just
came across the border. The life of an American hero was stolen by someone
who had no right to be in our country.
Day after day, precious lives are cut short by those who have violated our
In California, an Air Force veteran was raped, murdered, and beaten to
death with a hammer by an illegal alien with a long criminal history.
In Georgia, an illegal alien was recently charged with murder for killing,
beheading, and dismembering his neighbor.
In Maryland, MS-13 gang members who arrived in the United States as
unaccompanied minors were arrested and charged last year after viciously
stabbing and beating a 16-year-old girl.
Over the last several years, I have met with dozens of families whose loved
ones were stolen by illegal immigration. I have held the hands of the
weeping mothers and embraced the grief stricken fathers. So sad, so
terrible. I will never forget the pain in their eyes, the tremble in their
voices, and the sadness gripping their souls.
How much more American blood must we shed before Congress does its job?
To those who refuse to compromise in the name of border security, I would
ask, imagine if it was your child, your husband, or your wife whose life
was so cruelly shattered and totally broken.
To every member of Congress: pass a bill that ends this crisis.
To every citizen, call Congress, and tell them to finally, after all of
these decades, secure our border.
This is a choice between right and wrong, justice and injustice. This is
about whether we fulfill our sacred duty to the American citizens we serve.
When I took the oath of office, I swore to protect our country and that is
what I will always do, so help me God.
Thank you and good night.
MADDOW: President of the United States addressing the nation from the Oval
Office in primetime for the first time in his presidency.
The president not breaking new ground, repeating the various strains of
argument that he has relied on since the earliest days of his campaign to
claim that there is a wall that is needed on the southern border. In this
case, he did not explicitly say Mexico will pay for it. He said the wall
will pay for it. The wall will pay for the wall. It will pay for itself.
The president asserting the southern border in his words is a pipeline for
vast quantities of illegal drugs. The president`s own Drug Enforcement
Administration would say that`s not the case. I would at least say the
president`s proposed solution, a wall, would not stop the vast majority of
hard drugs coming in, even those coming in from Mexican cartels, those
coming through ports of entry and a wall would have nothing to do with
whether or not the hard drugs stopped.
Mainly, though, the president`s speech was a scare stories about immigrants
being terrible criminals who are coming into the United States to rape and
murder Americans, essentially, the president telling for pleasure because
it`s in their nature. It`s the sort of argument the president made the
very first day he came down the escalator in Trump Tower and sort of
shocked the Republican world when he announced that he would be running for
the Republican nomination because of the Mexican rapist and criminals who
are coming across the border.
We`re about to hear from Democrats. The top Democrats in Congress, Nancy
Pelosi and Chuck Schumer in response.
Briefly, before we get to that, Chris Hayes, heading into the speech from
the president, we were talking about whether or not this might be new
ground. I heard it as the same thing he always said.
HAYES: Yes, although there was a lot more emphasis in the first part of
the speech on the sort of threat inflation and creating, he never – I
don`t think he said the word wall. He said barrier. There is a little bit
of retreat from like the totemic wall thing and more of the focus on like
we`ve asked for this funding, can you give us this funding to move on?
Which I think is them kind of signaling how they want this to end.
NICOLLE WALLACE, MSNBC HOST, “DEADLINE WHITE HOUSE”: That`s about 3.0. I
mean, we heard steel slats ten days ago. So, I think we`re just at a steel
barrier. It changes every week. He doesn`t seem to be able to keep track
of what it is he`s proposing on the southern border.
I think there are half a dozen things that were wrong, falsehoods, lies and
you talked about a lot of them before the speech. But the big scam of the
whole address is there is a crisis. There is not a crisis. Border
crossings at the southern border are a 45-year low.
I spoke to a former senior intelligence official today said it`s his job to
know where the terrorists are and there aren`t any on the southern border.
So, crime is a great issue for him and he should tell crime, but he
shouldn`t lie about where it comes from.
MADDOW: Yes, and literally to your point, I mean, the first year of the
presidency, the apprehensions at the southern border was a 45-year low.
The number of apprehensions and crossings at the southern border has been
dropping since the year 2000.
WALLACE: Which is great. I mean, if he wants to win, maybe he should run
MADDOW: Democratic response now is coming up from Senator Chuck Schumer,
the leader of the Democrats of the Senate and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
REP. NANCY PELOSI (D-CA), SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE: Good evening.
I appreciate the opportunity to speak directly to the American people
tonight about how we can end this shutdown and meet the needs of the
American people. Sadly much of what we heard from President Trump
throughout this senseless shutdown has been full of misinformation and even
The president has chosen fear. We want to start with the facts.
The fact is on the very first day of this Congress, House Democrats passed
Senate Republican legislation to reopen government and fund smart,
effective border security solutions. But the president is rejecting these
bipartisan bills which would reopen government over his obsession with
forcing American taxpayers to waste billions of dollars on an expensive and
ineffective wall, a wall he always promised Mexico would pay for.
The fact is, President Trump has chosen to hold hostage critical services
for the health, safety, and well-being of the American people, and withhold
the paychecks of 800,000 innocent workers across the nation, many of them
He promised to keep the government shutdown for months or years, no matter
whom it hurts. That`s just plain wrong.
The fact is, we all agree we need to secure our borders while honoring our
values. We can build the infrastructure and roads at our ports of entry.
We can install new technology to scan cars and trucks for drugs coming into
our nation. We can hire the personnel we need to facilitate trade and
immigration at the border. We can fund more innovation to detect
The fact is, the women and children at the border are not a security
threat. They are a humanitarian challenge, a challenge that President
Trump`s own cruel and counterproductive policies have only deepened. And
the fact is, President Trump must stop holding the American people hostage
and stop manufacturing a crisis, and must reopen the government.
SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY), SENATE MINORITY LEADER: Thank you, Speaker
My fellow Americans, we address you tonight for one reason only. The
president of the United States, having failed to get Mexico to pay for his
ineffective, unnecessary border wall, and unable to convince the congress
or the American people to foot the bill, has shut down the government.
American democracy doesn`t work that way. We don`t govern by temper
tantrum. No president should pound the table and demand he gets his way or
else the government shuts down. Hurting millions of Americans who are
treated as leverage.
Tonight, and throughout this debate and throughout his presidency,
President Trump has appealed to fear, not facts. Division, not unity.
Make no mistake: Democrats and the president both want stronger border
security. However, we sharply disagree with the president about the most
effective way to do it.
So, how do we untangle this mess? Well, there`s an obvious solution.
Separate the shutdown from arguments over border security. There is
bipartisan legislation supported by Democrats and Republicans to reopen
government while allowing debate over border security to continue.
There is no excuse for hurting millions of Americans over a policy
difference. Federal workers are about to miss a paycheck. Some families
can`t get a mortgage to buy a new home. Farmers and small businesses won`t
get loans they desperately need.
Most presidents have used Oval Office addresses for noble purposes. This
president just used the backdrop of the Oval Office to manufacture a
crisis, stoke fear, and divert attention from the turmoil in his
My fellow Americans, there is no challenge so great that our nation cannot
rise to meet it. We can reopen the government and continue to work through
disagreements over policy. We can secure our border without an
ineffective, expensive wall. And we can welcome legal immigrants and
refugees without compromising safety and security.
The symbol of America should be the Statue of Liberty, not a 30-foot wall.
So our suggestion is a simple one. Mr. President, reopen the government,
and we can work to resolve our differences over border security. But end
this shutdown now.
MADDOW: What amounts to a Democratic rebuttal of the president this
evening. Again, the president`s remarks tonight from the Oval Office are
the first time he`s addressed the nation from the oval office in primetime.
Presidents tend to reserve addresses like that for various serious matters.
He will be giving a State of Union Address later this month. This was not
that, but like a State of the Union, Democrats asked for essentially
rebuttal time. Democratic leader of the Senate, Chuck Schumer, the newly-
elected House Speaker Nancy Pelosi side by side in a very serious tableau
there, responding to the president not point by point but essentially
trying to turn the focus from the president`s claims that he needs a border
wall to what he is holding hostage in order to try to get that, which is
the shutdown of the federal government.
Senator Schumer tonight closing by saying, our suggestion is a simple one,
Mr. President. Reopen the government and we can work to resolve our
differences over border security. He said earlier in his remarks, there is
an obvious solution, separate the shutdown from the arguments over border
security. There is partisan legislation supported by Democrats and
Republicans to reopen the government while allowing debate over border
security to continue.
Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House, echoing that same point, saying
that – her remarks, quote: The fact is on the very first day of this
Congress, House Democrats passed Senate Republican legislation to reopen
the government and fund smart effective border security solutions. So,
from the Democrats tonight, we`re hearing – whatever you think about
border security, Mr. President, we can fight about that. Let`s reopen the
government. Both Democrats and Republicans want that. You are the
sticking point here, not leaders from either party.
Nicolle Wallace and Chris Hayes are here with me onset.
Nicolle, let me ask your response to that, in some senses typical partisan
staging with the remarks from the president and the response from the
opposite party but two very different sets of remarks.
WALLACE: Yes. Listen, if you want to go to the politics, they were on the
ballot eight weeks ago. Donald Trump ran on that message in the midterms.
He ran on the made-up caravan and almost the same play. He doesn`t have a
lot of them so he reran it. It didn`t work in the midterms. His party was
thumped, lost control of the House.
And Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer`s message tonight was actually stronger
than what they ran on the midterms because now they can add not only are
you wrong but also like an 8-year-old taken your toys and gone home by
closing the entire federal government. So, I think in politics, in
Washington especially now, it`s all zero sum. So, if it`s a seesaw, who
went up and who went down, the power – the political potency of their
message tonight is on the up rise. Donald Trump has already grabbed as
many people he can grab with those admitted tragic stories of horrific
MADDOW: Chris Hayes?
HAYES: Yes, I thought the sort of difference in emphasis between the two
is the most notable thing about the two addresses, like Donald Trump went
out there and read us Steven Miller litany of horror stories, which he`s
been doing since day one.
WALLACE: In a nicer voice.
HAYES: In a nicer voice and I watch him do it in Cleveland, and, you know,
beheadings and rape and it`s awful stuff to hear. There is genuinely
horrific things that have happened but to conflate them with the 12 million
people living here is a kind of incitement that`s pretty ugly.
But we`ve heard that. Like Nicole said, that`s been the deal.
MADDOW: Slightly different list of crimes that evolves over time.
WALLACE: And updates.
MADDOW: It updates.
WALLACE: There are new crimes.
MADDOW: Right. But, it is – this, you know, office of immigrant crime
MADDOW: – that he`s been trying to solve from the very beginning and the
fact is that we`ve said it before and say it again, native born Americans
commit crimes at a higher rate than non-native born immigrants.
WALLACE: All crimes. Violent crimes, driving infractions, speeding. All
MADDOW: And it is – it is a demagogic old saw to try to pick out horrific
things that you`re going to attribute to one minority group, particularly
one powerless minority group in order to try to turn the majority against
them, and the president is singing that same song. But it really is
exactly the same scripts.
HAYES: But it`s literally the same – I feel like I was in Cleveland. I
remember watching that litany in Cleveland and being somewhat horrified and
shocked this was being delivered and to Nicolle`s point, as well, about –
you know, the point here and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has tweeted about
this a few days ago, she`d be a guest later, basically saying, look, you
want something, come and craft a bill and go through the process like
Lots of people want lots of things from the government. We have debates
and maybe you can work something out but this is not the way to do it.
WALLACE: And here is the deal, he doesn`t have public support. What he
had is a candidate, was at the base of the Republican supported that strain
of fear-mongering about illegal immigration. If he had public support,
he`d have a bill because members in Congress would support it.
I worked for a Republican president who addressed the nation over
comprehensive immigration reform at the point where he had bipartisan
support for it. President Obama should have been allowed to do the same
thing in 2014, in my opinion. But this is a president with no bill, he
doesn`t even have the Republicans on board, and he doesn`t have the public
behind, so it boggles the mind.
MADDOW: Well, with each passing day, two more Republicans peel off and say
let`s get the government restarted.
It should be noted as those Republicans peel off both in the Senate and in
the House, they are lining up with the official Democratic party position,
which is we`ll talk about this in some rational way if you want to but we
have to reopen the government.
HAYES: Cory Gardner who is up in 2020 in the state of Colorado, which is
increasingly a blue state and made some noises about wanting to reopen the
government; Cory Gardener will not be running for reelection in 2020 on the
message that came from the Oval Office tonight.
HAYES: At 100 percent, he will get thumped if he tries. And he knows
MADDOW: Here`s my question, though. We`re talking about how the president
is singing the same song that he has singing all along. This is not
different. He doesn`t have any support. He probably has less support than
he did before, particularly after the midterm elections.
So, why did he just do this? I mean, he didn`t announce a national
emergency so that he could use some sort of authority that he doesn`t think
he has otherwise to go build this. Why did this just happen?
HAYES: Because my – I`ve covered immigration politics since back in
McCain-Kennedy. I was at the mayday protest in the sense of a bill that
would make it a felony to be here illegally starting. I`ve been covering
it since then.
And every – as long as I`ve been covering it, there is a veto point with
the Steve Kings and the Steve Millers of the world have more intensity on
the issue than anyone else, and because of that intensity, even when
President Bush and McCain and Kennedy got together to pass comprehensive
reform, they have been able to kill it. When it passed the bill, they have
been able to kill it.
What he`s relying on the intensity of the sentiment among the people –
MADDOW: It`s a constant. There is nothing that caused that to spike now
so he tried –
HAYES: It`s worked before and killed two bills.
MADDOW: But it`s –
WALLACE: He doesn`t care about the bill. I don`t disagree with any of
that but it`s something simpler than that, and more primal. I think it`s -
- because it`s Trump, right?
Before the holidays, a close Trump ally said, I said what`s he doing? It
was the Mattis debacles spiraling out of control. And I said, what`s he
doing? He said he lives in object terror of his base and Robert Mueller.
So I think you can`t control this one, right? You can`t control what
Robert Mueller is doing but the base he can keep. The base feels that way.
They feel that intensity and so you can keep them.
MADDOW: But don`t you – so the base intensity doesn`t respond to the same
amount of stimulus, right? You have to keep pumping it a little in order
to keep –
MADDOW: Right. So, there is no – I mean, there`s the shutdown but
there`s no new argument. There`s no new evidence of support. There`s no
new – I mean –
WALLACE: The shutdown may peel some of it off. There is no data that I`ve
seen that shows that the base that grows when you shut the government down,
you may actually lose some.
WALLACE: There is a lot with the base with the federal government
HAYES: When you read the data out there and both sort of an anecdotally
and in the actual public opinion data, your – I remember last time that I
saw the Republican base really engaged was in the Kavanaugh fight. They
were unquestionably engaged. They were there all kinds of data that showed
it. They were there.
I mean, I heard anecdotal data, friends having fight with distance
relatives they didn`t realize were Republicans who were like, I don`t like
Trump but what they`re doing to Kavanaugh, that`s not happening here.
HAYES: We are not seeing any of that level of actual mobilization
engagement of people outside of the smallest core.
MADDOW: Can I tell you what I think is explaining why the president did
this? So Democrats won control of the House and the Democrats came back
this past week and it was like, whoa, the Democrats are the new protagonist
in the Washington story and everybody is covering all the new members being
sworn in and swearing in of Nancy Pelosi and all the kids up there with her
in the dais and what will the Democrats do? Who are going to be the
committee chairs and what`s their agenda?
The president was not getting talked about, and so the president summoned
reporters to see him do a White House press briefing in which he didn`t
take questions from the press and there is another day of coverage that`s
about the Democrats and what they will do in Washington and the president
pulls another stunt and says, no, no, no, I actually need you to pay
attention to me now. I`ll be giving remarks now.
I`m going to – and I honestly wonder if he – it occurred to him that he
hadn`t ever done an Oval Office address and that`s another thing to do to
turn the spotlight to himself regardless of having anything to say.
WALLACE: And a friend of his said at other points in the presidency that
he is the sun king and anything that obscures his access to the rays of
sunlight drives him mad. So, sort of like a mad king, he was there
watching everything you described and said, well, it also shows how shallow
his view of the presidency is. What other tricks do I have? What can I
MADDOW: Maybe do a cabinet meeting. Do we need to have a cabinet meeting?
Everybody around this table and acting secretary, can we have the camera
not just for a spray but for the entire hour and a half that I`d like them
in here? How many more stunts are there?
HAYES: But the difference here, what is so nuts about the situation, a lot
of times I always feel like he would rather be a pundit that people paid
attention to than the actual president, like he wants –
WALLACE: He wants Brian Kilmeade`s job.
HAYES: Yes, he wants to give you his takes. The president has takes and
wants to share them and he loves the nation listens to his takes, but he
doesn`t really love running the country. The thing is here, all of that
kind of weird theater he does, the cabinet meeting, the government
MADDOW: That`s exactly right.
WALLACE: The thing with the cabinet room, it hurts us because we have to
watch it and listen to us.
HAYES: It`s harmless.
WALLACE: People say ridiculous thing about their dear leader and face
their wives or their kids. No one is hurt or injured in that exercise.
People are hurting now. The economy will take a hit now. This is not
MADDOW: Chris Hayes, Nicolle Wallace, my friends, thank you for being here
with us tonight.
HAYES: Good to be here.
WALLACE: Thank you.
MADDOW: As you said, Chris, I think aptly the best pundit point I`ve heard
was this is weird. This is actually truly weird. Thank you.
WALLACE: Thanks, Rachel.
MADDOW: Three days after the president was elected, the ACLU wrote a
letter to newly elected Donald Trump asking him to please reconsider
basically every major campaign promise he made, from mass deportation to
the Muslim ban to banning abortion and greenlighting torture, they all
struck the folks the ACLU is being, according to the letter, not simply un-
American and wrongheaded but also unlawful and unconstitutional. They sent
it in this letter just after he was elected three days after the election.
Of course, Donald Trump didn`t heed their advice.
But the ACLU considered him to be warned and after having asked him to
resend those policies and him refusing, the ACLU then proceeded to sue the
pants off of him, taking literally dozens and dozens of legal actions
against Trump and his administration, a huge number of which involved
immigrants and immigration policy and sued over the original Muslim ban, as
well as the revised Muslim ban.
When the Trump administration tried to force teen immigrant girls to give
birth against their will, the ACLU sued over that. When the Trump
administration started effectively kidnapping babies and kids from their
parents at the southern border, the ACLU used to stop that. When the Trump
administration tried to remove asylum protections, from immigrant victims
of gang violence and domestic violence, the ACLU sued them over that.
Since day one of the Trump presidency, the ACLU has been at the forefront
with challenging and fact checking the president`s immigration policies.
Joining us now is Omar Jadwat. He`s the director of the ACLU`s Immigrants
Rights Project and he just saw the president`s remarks while he was waiting
to come on set with us.
Mr. Jadwat, thank you for being here.
OMAR JADWAT, ACLU IMMIGRANTS RIGHTS PROJECT DIRECTOR: Thanks for having
MADDOW: Let me ask your reaction to the contents of the president`s
remarks but also his choice to do this from the Oval Office tonight?
JADWAT: You`re not going to hear me say this very often. I think there
was one kernel of truth in what the president said and that was when he
said that there`s a humanitarian crisis at the border.
JADWAT: Not national security crisis. We`ve talked about or you`ve talked
about all the ways in which that`s transparently false, right?
But there is a humanitarian crisis he created at the border. He`s bottling
up women and children in refugee camps in Mexico. He`s continuing to run
these shelters – shelters is the wrong word. Detention facilities where
people are kept in extremely cold iceboxes with nothing but an aluminum
blanket. People are held out in the desert for hours with no medical
There is a huge range of things that this administration is not doing to
address a real humanitarian crisis. When he gets up on TV and says there
is a humanitarian crisis and the solution is a wall, the solution to women
and children seeking safety in the United States is to close the doors to
them being able to find protection from abuse, that`s – it`s a backwards
world that he`s living in.
MADDOW: The president – he used that phrase which is actually is a well-
wrought phrase. He said a crisis of the soul.
MADDOW: What he was talking about is the crisis of the soul is the need to
stop immigrant children, literally to stop the immigration of children over
the southern border. I wonder if you are relieved at all with the
president`s decision tonight to not announce some sort of emergency. There
was a lot of talk leading into this speech tonight that maybe the president
was calling for an Oval Office address and doing this not just because he
wanted to list the same complaints and horror stories about immigrants that
he`s been doing for years now, but instead because he wanted to announce
something now, he was going to claim new powers to address this under the
president`s authority that could be ascribed under some sort of an
Are you relieved he did not do that?
JADWAT: Well, look, I`m certainly glad that he`s not trying to at least in
this – at this point, in this way override Congress, right? That`s the
essential problem with this whole emergency plan that he was talking about
was the idea that he would try to, because Congress wouldn`t pass the law
he wants them to pass, won`t give him the funding for the wall he wants to
build, he`s just gong to do it on his own. That`s exactly what he`s tried
to do with this asylum ban that we see them over, right?
Congress passed a law says you can seek asylum anywhere, between ports of
entry, at ports of entry, he said no. I`m going to ban you from seeking
asylum between ports of entry – again, women, kids, people seeking
protection, people being persecuted, we`re going to slam the door on you
unless you wait months in these refugee camps, right?
He tried to do that. We stopped him. We sued him in court. It`s the same
basic problem with the emergency idea, the idea that you can just ignore
what Congress is doing and just go around them by enacting things. So, I`m
glad that at least for now he hasn`t tried to yet again to kind of
circumvent our democratic system.
MADDOW: I will tell you the one contrary take I have on that is had the
president tonight announced, I`m declaring an emergency and I under
emergency powers that I declare myself to have, I`m going to get my wall
built that way. And so, while I do that, Congress can do whatever they
want to open the government but I`ll get this wall built.
The reason that might have been a practical advance for the country because
I`m assuming you would have sued the heck out of him for any sort of
unconstitutional assertion the president might have made around those
emergency powers, that would have put that fight in the courts where he
would presumably lose and then the rest of the Congress could get on with
reopening government and fight this or any other policy.
JADWAT: I mean, I appreciate the practical kind of advantage there but –
MADDOW: I count on you –
JADWAT: I think, you know, if we`re at the point where we hope the
president takes a hugely unconstitutional –
MADDOW: Because that ties them up for awhile.
JADWAT: – to get him to accept the fact he`s losing in Congress, that`s
the wrong way to go.
MADDOW: All right. I will recalibrate.
Omar Jadwat is the director of the ACLU Immigrants Right Project – Omar,
thank you for much.
JADWAT: Thanks very much for having me.
MADDOW: I appreciate it.
MADDOW: It has not even been one week since the new Congress was sworn in
yet, but think about if you are a freshman lawmaker who has just been sworn
in to this Congress, right? It`s got to feel like suddenly finding
yourself onboard a plane that is hitting really bad turbulence upon take
off, with the oxygen mask popping out of the ceiling, right? This is
already the second longest government shutdown in U.S. history. If it
makes it through in the weekend – and there is no reason to think it might
not – this will become the longest government shutdown ever.
This is a painful thing for the U.S. economy and for a lot of people in
this country, but it`s also got to be just a spectacularly weird
environment to start your new job in, if your now job is that you`ve just
been elected a brand new member of Congress.
Joining us now is Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York.
Congresswoman, thank you so much for being with us tonight. I`m really
happy to have you here with us on the show.
REP. ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ (D), NEW YORK: Of course. Thank you for
having me, Rachel.
MADDOW: So, let me start by getting your top line reaction to the
president`s speech tonight. You have never been a member of Congress while
the government wasn`t shut down, so, obviously, this is a strange
circumstance for you and your colleagues in the freshman class to be taking
your first steps.
OCASIO-CORTEZ: Yes, absolutely. I cannot tell you the amount of
dysfunction that this president is advancing. We now have over 100 new
members of the freshman class.
I cannot even get laptops to my caseworkers on the ground in the Bronx and
Queens so they can process the needs of our constituents. We can`t
mortgage – you know, we cannot get case work started because we can`t even
get laptops in the hands of our district offices because the president has
decided to hold the paychecks of everyday Americans hostage so that he can
fulfill a campaign, I don`t even – I don`t even want to call it a promise,
a campaign fantasy that the vast majority of Americans disapprove of.
And not only that, but in the actual address, there was falsehood after
falsehood, and we have to make sure that we get our facts straight. Every
day, immigrants commit crimes at a far lower rate than native-born
Americans. And not only that, but the women and children on that border
that are trying to seek refuge and seek opportunity in the United States of
America with nothing but the shirt on their backs are acting more American
than any person who seeks to keep them out ever will be.
MADDOW: Are you at all dissuaded – not dissuaded, I guess it`s a wrong
word. Dismayed or discouraged by the fact that the president has been
saying the same untrue things about immigrant crime, about the terrible
character of immigrants coming into this country, about a false
relationship that he has invented between violent crime and immigration.
We heard him tell falsehoods tonight contradicted even by his own
administration about this flood – as he described it, a pipeline of drugs
coming across the southern border, his own Drug Enforcement Administration
has said that the vast majority of drugs, even those coming from the south
of, from south from this country are coming through ports of entry and not
over anything that would be stopped by a wall.
Are you discouraged or what`s your sort of strategic take on the fact that
the president has been telling the same lies for years now and not shying
away from them at all?
OCASIO-CORTEZ: Well, I think it`s not unsurprising because even before he
was elected president of the United States, he has proven track record of
discrimination against anybody that`s really none white in the United
States. He had been sued by the Nixon administration back in the day for
not renting to black Americans. He has had controversy after controversy.
So, this is very consistent. It`s not just the continued lies throughout
his administration but frankly, it`s part of a very consistent pattern of
his entire life.
But I think it`s extremely important – you know, I represent New York`s
14th congressional. We are 50 percent immigration. I represent the Bronx
and Queens, Jackson Heights, over 200 languages are spoken in my district
alone. We enjoy some of the highest rates of economic activity and the
Bronx itself has had some of the highest rates of economic growth in all of
New York City and that has been directly, directly correlated with our
embrace of immigrants.
New York City overall is an immigrant city and we enjoy a very large amount
of economic and cultural prosperity as a result.
MADDOW: The president has been singing this same song that he did a
different version of tonight in the Oval Office, since the very, very start
of his campaign. He has made anti-immigrant rhetoric and often factually
incorrect screeds demonizing immigrants, more core to his presidency than
any form of his rhetoric.
And so, in your district, in a district as you say that is not just diverse
but 50 percent immigrant and that you`re talking about the sort of economic
relationship that you can see between immigrant economic activity and the
overall performance of your district, what`s the consequence of having
somebody as president who has made this core to his message and to what he
wants his presidency to mean? What is the harm that`s caused by him
talking this way and using this sort of platform the way he has even when
he can`t get his policies passed?
OCASIO-CORTEZ: I can – I can tell you a very personal story. And as many
people know, I was working in restaurants just a year ago. And when the
president first assumed office with his – with his racist and violent
rhetoric, people started to send themselves home. And as we know, in
restaurants, hospitality, every American eats if you can, if you`re lucky
enough or we`re able to eat three times a day.
And that means we interact with the people who prepare our food three times
a day. When those people start to go home, local or rather go back to
their countries which they originated from because many of them consider
the United States their home, those places, they go into dysfunction.
I remember one of our lead cooks brought himself back to Mexico because he
was so scared of the president`s rhetoric. We had an insane amount of
We`re talking about local restaurants. We`re talking about local
businesses. We`re talking about shuttering neighborhoods. And we`re
talking about people feeling unsafe.
And no one should feel unsafe in the United States of America. And that
includes our amazing and beautiful and productive immigrant community.
And moreover, the one thing the president has not talked about is the fact
he has systematically engaged in the violation of international human
rights borders on – human rights on our border. He has separated children
from their families. He talked about what happened the day of Christmas on
the day of Christmas, a child died in ICE custody.
The president should not be asking for more money to an agency that has
systematically violated human rights. The president should be really
defending why we are funding such an agency at all because right now, what
we are seeing is death. Right now, what we are seeing is the violation of
human rights. These children and these families are being held in what are
called hieleras, which are basically freezing boxes that no person should
be maintained in.
For any amount of time, let alone the amount of time they are being kept
on, and more over, even if you are anti-immigrant in this country, the
majority of immigrant overstays, the majority of the reason that people are
undocumented is visa overstay. It`s not because people are crossing a
border illegally. It is because of visa overstay which mind you, he`s
talking about legal immigration, he`s trying to restrict every form of
legal immigration there is in the United States.
He`s fighting against family reunification. He`s fighting against the
diversity visa lottery. He`s fighting against almost ever way that people
can actually legally enter this country, forcing them to become
undocumented, and then he`s trying to attack their undocumented status.
This is systematic. It is wrong and it is anti-American. And again, those
women and children trying to come here with nothing but the shirts on their
back to create an opportunity and to provide for this nation are acting
more in an American tradition than this president is right now.
MADDOW: Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, thank you so
much for being with us tonight. I know this is your first time being here
on the show and I know that you have been one of the highest profile
members of this new Congress and you`ve got a lot of pressures on your
time. Thanks for making time to be here and I hope you`ll come back.
OCASIO-CORTEZ: Of course. Thank you so much.
MADDOW: All right. Still to come, an avalanche of legal developments we
saw today. There is a lot to get to tonight. Do please stay with us.
MADDOW: Busy day, right? I do not know why the president chose tonight to
give an Oval Office version of the same speech he`s been making since 2015,
but I do know what happened today in the news that the White House must be
excited to try to push out of the headlines with that speech.
All right. Do you remember the Trump Tower Moscow project? The
president`s long-time personal attorney Michael Cohen pled guilty a few
weeks ago to lying to Congress about the Trump Tower Moscow Project. Now,
in the course of those court proceedings about Michael Cohen, we learned
that the president himself had repeatedly lied about that project to the
public and had tried to keep it secret during the campaign even though he
and his organization were pursuing it during the campaign.
Well, that tower – that would be Trump Tower Moscow now looms as a fairly
serious issue both for the scandal about Russia getting involved in the
presidential election to benefit Trump but it also looms over the prospect
that the president may have been compromised by a foreign government even
during the time that he has been president, right? After all, when Trump
and the Trump Organization were working during the campaign to try to build
Trump Tower Moscow and they were working with the Russian government to try
to get that deal done, the Russian government knew that those conversations
and those negotiations were underway, they also knew that Trump was
publicly lying about it and trying to keep it secret.
That alone means that Russia had something on him, something they could use
to pressure him, something they could use to blackmail him. They could
somehow use that as leverage over him, both during his campaign and during
his time as president, during all of the time they knew that secret about
him that he for some reason didn`t want let out.
Well, here is one important brand-new thing about that scandal. Recall
that Trump Tower Moscow was reportedly supposed to be financed by a Russian
bank that was under U.S. sanctions. This isn`t as simple as it seems,
bottom line, presumably in order for Trump to get his Trump Tower Moscow
deal, which we think would have been the biggest real estate deal of his
U.S. sanctions against Russian entities, including that bank, would need to
have been dropped or at least softened. That`s what made it so interesting
when we learned that the two guys from the Trump Organization who were
working on Trump Tower Moscow, Felix Sater and Michael Cohen, they also got
involved in an effort right after Trump was elected to concoct a new plan
that would result in sanctions being dropped on Russia. It was dreamed up
as a peace plan. Michael Cohen and Felix Sater were involved in that.
This peace plan, its terms are ridiculous. The whole point of it was to
drop sanctions on Russia. That, of course, would have had the effect of
dropping sanctions on that bank that was slated to finance this gigantic
real estate deal that they were working on for Trump, which is going to
make them all hundreds of millions of dollars. So, we`ve know about that
heading into today. Trump Tower Moscow thing, the president is lying about
it. Trump Tower Moscow due to be financed by a Russian bank, the guys
working on Trump Tower Moscow working on a plan to drop Russian sanctions.
Today, we`ve learned that the president`s campaign chairman may have worked
on that too. Paul Manafort publicly denied in 2017 that he had anything to
do with the supposed peace plan that would have resulted in the dropping of
Russian sanctions. But today, Manafort`s defense team filed this document
in federal court in D.C. in which they apparently didn`t redact things
You can see from the filing, there are a bunch of things behind blacked
boxes. You`re not supposed to be able to read those things. But they
screwed up when they tried to redact the document. And if you, in fact,
open it up on your computer, you can read what is behind those blacked
And so, because of that mistake, by accident, part of what we learned today
in this Manafort court filing is that president`s campaign chair, Paul
Manafort, he has told prosecutors from the special counsel`s office that he
did work on that plan to drop Russian sanction or at least he worked on
something that was called a Ukraine peace plan.
The Felix Sater/Michael Cohen plan apparently was this plan that took shape
after Trump was elected. If that`s the same plan Manafort has told
prosecutors he was involved with, the timing of this thing is unusual,
right? I mean, Manafort got fired from the campaign months before the
election. Did they bring back the fired campaign chairman with links to
Russia to do work on this effort to drop Russian sanctions along with the
guys from Trump`s business who were trying to get the Trump Tower Moscow
We don`t know the details of it, but that revelation that Manafort was
involved and that he has told prosecutors about this, that is new today.
We also learned from that same document today from the bad redactions in
that document, that prosecutors believe Manafort shared polling data from
the campaign with a business associate of his, a business associate of his
who incidentally has been also indicted by Robert Mueller. He is also a
person who has been described by the FBI in court documents as being
associated and tied with Russian intelligence.
We did not previously know that one of the things Manafort was accused of
doing during the campaign was giving polling data from the campaign to a
guy in Russian intelligence. But now, we know that prosecutors allege that
that`s one of the things that Paul Manafort did.
So that accidentally un-redacted court filing today, that was revelatory in
a couple of different levels. It was also just one of a bunch of different
developments in the Russia secondly today, and specifically in the legal
jeopardy of people associated with the president and his campaign related
to that scandal. Today for example, this indictment was unsealed against
Natalia Veselnitskaya, who was the lawyer who attended the Trump Tower
meeting during the campaign with Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner and Donald
Trump Jr. That was the meeting they took, purportedly to get dirt from the
Russian government about Hillary Clinton.
In today`s indictment of Veselnitskaya, prosecutors in the southern
district of New York alleged that she lied to a federal court. She lied to
a federal judge in a Russian money laundering case because she wanted to
conceal the fact that she was effectively working on behalf of the Russian
government. She entered into the record in that money laundering case
something that she described as a Russian government independent
investigation of the issue. When, in fact, it wasn`t an independent
investigation at all. In fact, she had helped the Russian government
produce that document.
Because she was working for the Russian government and trying to pretend
like she was not, the court ultimately was able to ferret out that she lied
to the court on that matter. She is charged with obstruction of justice
now. And there`s a whole bunch of intriguing questions about this
indictment. I mean, number one, this alleged attempt by her to obstruct
justice in that case, in that New York courtroom, prosecutors say that
effort by her happened in November of 2015. That`s a long time ago. Why
did they charge her now?
Our own Richard Engel in a special hour that he did for this show, he
documented in detail this alleged obstruction of justice by Veselnitskaya
that is spelled out in the indictment today. Richard Engel confronted
Veselnitskaya about that in an interview. That was April of last year.
Why was Veselnitskaya just indicted for it now?
And actually, a further question, it looks like she was indicted for this
obstruction of justice on December 20th. That indictment was filed under
seal for some reason. And 19 days later, today, this indictment was
unsealed and we`re all now allowed to see it. Why does that timing make
And then just as we were absorbing that news, we got further word today
that the chairs of seven major committees in Congress are now challenging
Trump`s treasury secretary over a Trump administration decision that was
announced just before Congress to lift sanctions on companies associated
with this man, Oleg Deripaska.
Deripaska is an oligarch close to Vladimir Putin. He himself had an odd
connection to Paul Manafort and the Trump campaign. This is the guy to
whom Manafort offered private briefings during the campaign. Again, you
know, why was the president`s campaign chair offering private briefings on
the campaign to a Russian oligarch close to Vladimir Putin who is now under
U.S. sanctions? While at the same time he was apparently providing polling
data about the campaign to a guy associated with Russian intelligence who
happens to have been his conduit to the Russian oligarch connected to
Putin. Why did the Trump campaign at the highest levels have all these
connections to the Kremlin? We don`t know.
But tonight, “The New York Times” citing a single source reports that when
Manafort shared internal private polling data from the Trump campaign with
that Russian intelligence guy, he asked that guy to pass that internal data
on to Oleg Deripaska and Donald Trump`s Treasury Department announced just
before Christmas they want to relax sanctions on the company associated
with that oligarch Oleg Deripaska.
And now, today, the seven Democratic committee chairs in the House of
Representatives are demanding the Trump administration explain that
decision. They`re demanding an immediate meeting with the secretary of the
treasury, Steven Mnuchin, to explain why these are going away.
Quote: Dear Secretary Mnuchin, we write in response to a December 19th
notification indicating that the Treasury Department intends to terminate
sanctions on these three Russian companies as part of a deal with Oleg
Deripaska, a Russian oligarch who has abetted the Putin regime`s malign
activity against the United States. Quote, as the chairs of committees
with oversight jurisdiction over the U.S. response to Russia`s attempts to
interfere in our elections and other hostile actions, we have a number of
concerns about the agreement that the U.S. has reached with Mr. Deripaska.
The seven committee chairmen are asking treasury to delay the
implementation of this relaxation on Deripaska`s companies. They`re asking
for a full explanation how the treasury arrived at this decision and they
want a meeting between Steven Mnuchin and, quote, all interested members on
this subject and they want that meeting soon before the sanctions are
Again, the clock is ticking. Congress has 30 days to object to the lifting
of these sanctions. The Trump administration announced just before
Christmas that that clock had started ticking because they announced that
they`d be lifted. And then as we were absorbing that information, we got
further word that the United States Supreme Court has weighed in for the
first time today on an aspect of the Mueller investigation. This is about
a case that remains shrouded in secrecy, but the Supreme Court today
declined to intervene on behalf of an unknown corporation that`s owned by
an unknown foreign country that`s been fighting a subpoena that we believe
is from the special counsel`s office.
In a very short order today from the Supreme Court, and a long and
fascinating order from the D.C. Court of Appeals, we learned today almost
nothing about the identity of this corporation or which country owns this
corporation, but we do know as of today that at the highest levels of the
U.S. judiciary, that foreign country and that foreign corporation, they`re
getting no help in their efforts to resist a subpoena about something that
pertains to the special counsel`s investigation.
So, this is today. Manafort was maybe working on dropping Russian
sanctions, possibly along with the Trump Tower Moscow guys. Manafort was
giving polling data, internal polling data from the campaign to a guy in
Russian intelligence who he was then asking to pass it on to a Russian
oligarch close to Putin. The Russian lawyer from the Trump tower meeting
has been criminally indicted in the United States for lying about the fact
that she represents the Russian government.
The Democrats that just took over the House of Representatives are getting
up on their hind legs and trying to stop the Trump administration from
dropping sanctions on companies owned by the pro-Putin oligarch that
Trump`s campaign chair was trying to pay back during the Trump campaign
somehow and to whom Manafort was apparently funneling internal polling data
from the campaign.
And the Supreme Court is not going to help country “A” and their unknown
corporation, which the guise of the Mueller special counsel investigation.
And now, that corporation is in contempt of court and being charged $50,000
a day until they comply with Mueller`s subpoena.
Other than that, not much happened today, though. Wonder what tomorrow`s
going to be like.
That does it for us tonight. We will see you again tomorrow.
Now, it`s time for “THE LAST WORD WITH LAWRENCE O`DONNELL”.
Good evening, Lawrence.
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY
Copyright 2019 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.>
Copyright 2019 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are
protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the
prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter
or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the