Schiff: Parts of dossier have been corroborated Transcript 10/12/17 The Rachel Maddow Show
Show: THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW
Date: October 12, 2017
Guest: Adam Schiff, Carmen Yulin Cruz
CHRIS HAYES, MSNBC HOST, ALL IN: THE RACHEL MADDOW SHOW starts now.
Good evening, Rachel.
RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST: Good evening, Chris. Thanks my friend.
HAYES: You bet.
MADDOW: I appreciate it.
Thanks to at home for joining us this hour. It`s been a busy news day.
We got a new nominee to run the Homeland Security Department today. We
reported last night that this was likely. Today, it was announced that
Kirstjen Nielsen will be nominated to run that agency. She was chief of
staff to John Kelly when he briefly served as homeland security secretary
this year. And when John Kelly left that job to become White House chief
of staff, Ms. Nielsen came with him from homeland security over to the
So, if her nomination is approved, she`ll now go back to the Homeland
Security Department to become the new person running that agency. She`s
known for her expertise on cyber security in particular. It`s notable for
this administration that she`s not seen as somebody totally unsuited to
this position. She`s not seen as having dramatic conflicts of interest
that would preclude her from serving in this position than any other
administration or attuned to ethical concerns.
Politically, Kirsten Nielsen has been known as a relatively mainstream
Republican, I believe maybe a Jeb Bush supporting Republican during the
primaries I think. So, you would think that might preclude her from
getting a job in this administration, but they did roll out that nomination
today. And so far for whatever reason, the pro-Trump conservative media
machine doesn`t seem to be going nuts about her. So, we shall see.
Homeland Security Department has had nobody running it since July that
Kirstjen Nielsen has now been nominated.
She`s not the only Trump administration nominee who made news today though.
Today, we learned that the acting director of pipeline safety in the Trump
administration, the newly appointed top federal regulator charged with
overseeing the safety of oil and gas pipelines, she apparently has not
given up her outside business interests in order to take that job. And one
of her outside business interests is selling equipment for oil spill
That`s like if there`s one guy in your town who has a business selling
tires and fixing broken axles, and you decide to put him in charge of
filling the puddles in town, like maybe he`ll be great at that. But if he
isn`t great at that he`s definitely got a plan B.
“The Washington Post” also broke the news today that the president has
chosen a new administrator to lead NOAA, the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration. The Trump picked for that job as a businessman
who has long sought to privatize the National Weather Service, specifically
to limit the amount of information the weather service provides to the
public for free, so his family business instead can do that for profit.
A for-profit National Hurricane Center, right? Yes, what could possibly go
We have a story coming up this hour about one of the disaster medical
assistance teams that has been dispatched to Puerto Rico as part of the
response to hurricane Maria. This story that we`ve got coming up on that
tonight is not a good news story, but it is – as far as we know – the
latest Trump administration I`m quitting in protest stories so we`ve got
that story coming up a little later on.
I want to start tonight though with some stuff that has been a little bit
swamped in the news over the last couple of days but it is now starting to
feel like you ought to be aware this is going on. Adams Schiff, the top
Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, is going to be here tonight to help
us sort through some of this in just a second.
But just check this out. Today, you may have seen this report at
politico.com, very well-written, well-reported piece, which says that the
president might offer to sit down for an interview with special counsel
Robert Mueller who`s leading the investigation into the Russian attack on
our election last year. If the White House did decide to do this, that
would make Trump the first president since Bill Clinton to face questions
under oath from a federal prosecutor.
And you remember what happened then, right? Bill Clinton`s four hours of
sworn testimony in the Whitewater affair and the Monica Lewinsky matter,
that testimony later became in large part the basis of House Republicans
impeachment effort against President Clinton.
And it`s not like other presidents haven`t testified or talked to
prosecutors in other criminal matters but that impeachment history with
Clinton and this particular presidents tendency to say stuff that just pops
into his head particularly what he is under pressure, those factors I think
made it a surprise to a lot of people when this story came out of politico
today saying that the president`s legal team on Russia was going to want
the president under oath with Mueller`s 18 prosecutors. It just seems like
a surprise they want that anytime during this lifetime, let alone anytime
Here`s the thing though. The president`s lead lawyer on Russia stuff I
think, I think it`s his lead lawyer on Russia`s stuff now. It`s not always
easy to tell. There`s been a few different ones.
The guy who I think is the president`s lead Russia lawyer, he apparently
does not consent to this strategy. He may have not been aware that this
strategy was being discussed, let alone pursued by the White House with
regards to the Russia investigation. “Politico” had posted this article
saying Trump`s going to sit down with Mueller. Posted it at 5:00 a.m. this
morning. They updated it a few hours later just before 11:00 a.m. to add a
comment from John Dowd who I think is supposed to be the Trump`s –
supposed to be Trump`s lead lawyer on Russian now.
I`m just going to quote directly what he told “Politico”. This is just
quoting directly from the article.
Quote: The president`s personal lawyer John Dowd initially declined to
comment for this story. However, in an email sent after this article was
initially published, Dowd said, quote, totally false – exclamation point,
exclamation point, exclamation point, exclamation point, exclamation point,
exclamation point – he went on for 16 exclamation points, 16.
So, the White House tells “Politico”, yes, we want President Trump to talk
with Robert Mueller`s prosecutors. Trump`s lawyer on Russia then swallows
his tongue and starts gargling, no, no, no, no. That`s a terrible idea,
with 16 exclamation points.
And then another one of the president`s Russia lawyers Ty Cobb, the amazing
mustache guy, he calls up a conservative Website to drop some further
highfalutin legalese on this sensitive subject. His comment on this matter
to “The Daily Caller” Website was, quote, nobody in the White House would
be this stupid. Well, you never know.
This is a president facing the most serious criminal and
counterintelligence investigation ever levied against any U.S. president
ever. Actually, it`s probably the most serious investigation ever levied
against any high ranking us official ever, not even just presidents. And
his lawyers for this fight are just not who you`d expect to be representing
a U.S. president in a fight like this. There`s just a little touch of the
carnival act to these guys.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: CNBC caught up with Mr. Dowd just a short time ago.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
REPORTER: Do you have comment for CNBC though?
JOHN DOWD, ATTORNEY: Get the (EXPLETIVE DELETE) out of here.
DOWD: That`s what I got to CNBC.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
MADDOW: So that`s John Dowd. That`s the president`s lead private counsel
on Russia. He`s the one with the sixteen exclamation points in his last
comment to politico.com. He`s also the one who forwarded those
secessionist emails to reporters apparently without meaning to a few weeks
back. He was also the one who sat down with the president`s other lead
Russia lawyer, the one whose salary were paying as a White House official
now. He and Ty Cobb sat down apparently unwittingly next to a “New York
Times” reporter who at the time was taking pictures of them and writing
down what they were saying as they were discussing the president`s legal
strategy and how much they didn`t like the White House counsel.
And the reason that conversation in the picture of them having it ended up
in “The New York Times” is because they chose to have that conversation at
an outdoor table at a restaurant that is literally immediately next door to
the Washington bureau of “The New York Times”, and it never occurred to
them maybe guys take it inside.
These guys took over as the president`s top Russia lawyers after this other
one had to disappear once his first written statement on the Russian matter
misspelled the word president, I kid you not, and then his first verbal
statement on the Russian matter was an announcement that he was filing a
plate against James Comey and then he never did, and his first known email
communication on the Russia matter was this, sent to a random stranger in
the middle of the night, quote, I know where you live. Watch your back you
– think that rhymes with ditch. I`m on you, you will see me.
Marc Kasowitz, who would previously represented Donald Trump in the Trump
University case where the president had to pay $25 million in a fraud
settlement. He was going to lead the president`s defense on Russia matters.
Apparently though, he has either been raptured or he`s become invisible or
something`s happened to him because after his very inauspicious debut, he`s
So, now, it`s the 16 exclamation points guy and the mustache guy at the
restaurant, step right up, anybody can play. They are a funky bunch. But
they are – no offense to the actual funky bunch – but this is the legal
team representing the president of the United States on this incredibly
If they were a more normal legal team we might expect a more normal stream
of information from them about how the investigation is proceeding, about
how the president was mounting his defense. I mean, instead with these
guys, it really is – you know, the swearing and the exclamation points and
calling people stupid and it`s just sort of basically up to us to figure it
out, this very serious thing about the future of our country.
So, let me just give you a couple of things one I think is potentially very
serious. One is maybe not so serious. But they`re both things we might
otherwise expect to have real information about in a presidential crisis
that is itself is this serious we`re sort of left to figure these things
out ourselves so let`s try to figure it out.
First ones this – Friday night, Department of Justice made a court filing
federal court in Washington D.C. in conjunction with a lawsuit brought
against the Trump administration by a watchdog group. Now, there have been
news reports that members of the White House staff had started using
encrypted messaging apps at works. They`re doing official business on
encrypted apps that can be programmed to delete messages right after
they`re sent or received.
Based on those reports the watchdog CREW sued the Trump administration
under the Presidential Records Act. The Presidential Records Act was
passed as part of the post-Watergate reforms in 1978. It`s a very simple
law. Richard Nixon had tried to declare that the Oval Office tapes and
White House communications and diaries and notes were all his personal
property, nobody had a right to see them. There with big legal fights over
The Presidential Records Act made clear that presidential records are
public records and as a consequence, you can`t destroy them. So with every
administration post-Watergate, the Presidential Records Act has just made
it crystal clear in advance unequivocally that we the people and historians
and journalists and investigators will eventually get access to
presidential papers. We don`t get everything right away and there`s always
some exceptions in terms of privacy and national security, in terms of what
exactly we get.
But in general, presidential records are public records they are not
private. That`s clear in the law, and we the people have a right to access
to them. And therefore, White House staff can`t you know keep White House
papers for themselves. They can`t trash them. They can`t steal them.
They can`t do anything that`s designed to keep those records from being
accessed by the public.
So, CREW files this suit and in response to this lawsuit on Friday night
quietly, the Trump Justice Department makes its argument in response to
their lawsuit. And their argument is that that whole presidential records
thing, that`s over – on the messaging app issue but also on – they
mentioned potential tape recordings of conversations in the White House –
they discussed the prospect of the president deleting his tweets, they
discussed the prospect of White House staff potentially purging information
off their phones or their computers. Presidential Records Act does not
apply, that`s their argument.
And this finally, Friday night, the Trump Justice Department quietly made
this seemingly very radical legal argument that they have the right to
delete anything they want whenever they want to and nobody can review it.
This is just the first line of the brief that they filed on Friday night.
Quote: Courts cannot review the president`s compliance with the
Presidential Records Act.
They continue later in the brief, quote, the law does not permit judicial
review of whether the president is properly managing and preserving records
that are subject to the Presidential Records Act. Again, this filing was
made on Friday night. It was posted online by the heroic online archivist
Restkick (ph). It was then written up at the Hollywood Reporter”, God
bless `em, but it hasn`t had a lot of attention outside that.
Here`s the question though: is this just a like random, shot in the dark
legal argument from the administration or is this their declaration that
this is how they`re handling presidential records? I mean now that the
Trump Justice Department is declaring in this legal filing that it is the
view of this administration when it comes to White House records, tapes,
all White House records, electronic or otherwise. I mean, the brief says
that this attitude applies to all records created or received by this
president and his closest advisors.
If their argument about that is that no court can tell them those things
have to be reviewed, preserved, right, is this a sign that say
investigators might not be able to get their hands on records from the
Trump White House? If this is the Trump administration`s legal opinion
about whether they even have to keep those records does that mean that we
should expect no records to end up in the hands of investigators, let alone
historians, let alone the public?
So, again, Adam Schiff, one of the members of Congress who`s leaving one of
those investigations in Congress, top Democrat in the intelligence
committee, he`ll be joining us in just a few minutes we can ask him about
But here`s one more, it`s the last thing I`m going to raise here, and this
may not be the most serious thing in the world, but if a president facing
this serious a criminal investigation had a less slapstick legal team,
right, sort of more normal lawyers advising him, this would be the sort of
thing that would have already been explained by now. But because we have
these guys, because we have 16 exclamation points, right, this thing I`m
about hanging out there now with no explanation about why this happened or
how this happened or what could possibly be innocent for it.
And I will preface this by saying, I recognize this one may not end up
being all that serious, part of the reason I want to give you that caveat
is because where this all started was with kind of a dirty joke.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
JAY LENO, LATE NIGHT TV HOST: Now, what`s going on with you and Trump?
You and Trump have some kind of beef going. What – what happen? It seems
like you two should be good friends I can`t imagine.
BILL MAHER, COMEDIAN: He`s the one who`s been tweeting mean things about
MAHER: And you know, look, I`m not looking for a feud with Donald Trump
and I certainly only wish the best for the syphilitic monkey who does his
LENO: A syphilitic money, which is even worse.
MAHER: Well, the monkey thing, that – I think that`s what got him so mad.
MAHER: We did a new rule one week that suppose that perhaps Donald Trump
had been the spawn of his mother having sex with an orangutan, because –
well, I didn`t just make this up. The color of his hair –
MAHER: – and the color of an orange orangutan is the only two things in
nature of the same color.
LENO: I wonder what that was for –
MAHER: I`m not, I`m not saying it`s true, I hope it`s not true.
MAHER: But unless he comes up with proof, I`m willing to offer $5 million
LENO: Wow, $5 million.
MAHER: He will come – that he can donate to a charity of his choice –
LENO: Charity of his choice.
MAHER: Hair club for men.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
MAHER: I`m not endorsing the joke, but this happened in public life, this
was around the time that Donald Trump had offered president Obama $5
million to the charity of his choice if he released his college records,
right? This is around the whole birther thing.
So, this was Bill Maher`s response to that public behavior by Donald Trump
well before you ever ran for president. I`ll give you $5 million if you can
prove that you`re not the son of an orangutan. That happened in 2013.
What ends up being arguably important about that it`s not the joke itself,
it`s the fact that Trump actually hired a lawyer to sue Bill Maher over
that joke in part by submitting proof that he Donald Trump was not the son
of an orangutan.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
DONALD TRUMP, THEN-BUSINESSMAN: He made an offer on the show, and that
involved my birth certificate and other things, and it was a $5 million
offer to charity, and I immediately accepted his offer, sent a legal letter
out to him by very good lawyer, who told me you have an absolute case as
soon as you accept his offer. So, we essentially sent him a bill, a legal
representation for $5 million. So, he has – I don`t know if he has $5
million, maybe he doesn`t, but he made an offer of $5 million. I accepted
MAHER: His lawyer sent me a letter I (EXPLETIVE DELETED) you not, this is
real. His lawyer sent me a letter that says and I, quote, attached here to
is a copy of Mr. Trump`s birth certificate demonstrating that he is the son
of Fred Trump and not an orangutan.
MAHER: Do these morons even know it`s impossible for people and apes to
And look at the lawyer`s signature. It just kind of trails off, as if to
say, I`m not too embarrassed to even finish it. Scott, (EXPLETIVE
DELETED), I`m Trump lawyer.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
MADDOW: OK, the name that trails off there, the man who Donald Trump
describes as his very good lawyer who filed this official representation
with Bill Maher that Donald Trump was the son of Fred not the son of a
monkey, that is a real lawyer and his name is Scot Balber, and that should
be another forgettable chapter in Donald Trump picks lawyers, right?
But you know where that guy popped up this week? On Monday, “The
Washington Post” reported they`d obtained new contemporaneous documentation
about the Trump Tower meeting that happened last summer involving Trump
campaign manager Paul Manafort, Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and a whole
bunch of Russians linked to the Putin government and two Russian military
The new documentation obtained by the email about the Trump Tower meeting
from Natalia Veselnitskaya, the Russian government lawyer who set up that
meeting. Her email was sent on the morning. Her email asked the British
intermediary who would contact a Donald Trump Jr. to set up the meeting if
it would be OK if she brought with her to the meeting a lobbyist and
Now, I don`t think that additional email from the Russian lawyer shed all
that much more light on why the Trump campaign was taking that meeting with
Russian officials promising dirt on Hillary Clinton in the middle of the
election. What stands out about that new email that “The Washington Post”
obtained this week, that email from the Russian lawyer, what stands out
about that is that the person they got that email from is a lawyer working
for the Putin-linked Russian billionaire in this case, the guy who handed
over that email from the Russian lawyer about that meeting this week, that
lawyer is Scott Balber. The same lawyer who represented Donald Trump in
his stupid fight with Bill Maher in 2013 over whether or not Donald Trump
was secretly half an orangutan. He represented Donald Trump on matters
like that, although who knows how many matters like about there were, maybe
it was just the one.
But he was Trump`s lawyer on something like that. He`s now representing
the Russian side of the Trump Tower meeting we`re the top echelon of the
Trump campaign took a meeting with Russian government officials to get
Russian government assistance in the election, including dirt on Hillary
Clinton, same guy.
We contacted Scott Balber today to ask him if there was any connection at
all between his previous representation of Mr. Trump and the fact that he`s
now representing the Russians behind the Russian government offering dirt
on Hillary Clinton during the election, Mr. Balber responded to us tonight
promptly which was very nice of him.
His response was this, quote: Nice try, but absolutely no connection
There is no such thing as a normal investigation of an American president
for his ties to a hostile foreign government that interfered in the
election that elected him president. There`s no normal version of that,
right? But when somebody who used to be the president`s lawyer quite
recently turns up in the middle of that investigation representing the
Russian side, that seems like something that requires more than nice try as
If the president had less hilarious legal representation in the first
place, we could probably expect an explanation for something like that.
But in this world that we live in, we got to figure these things out
ourselves. We do our best.
Top Democrat on the Intelligence Committee joins us coming up. Stay with
MADDOW: We`re starting the fourth week now since Hurricane Maria hit
Puerto Rico and we continue to get dramatic footage of how bad conditions
are. But now that it is more than three weeks out from when that storm
hit, the fact that conditions are still so difficult is no longer just a
manifestation of how big and powerful the storm was, it`s how insufficient
the response has been.
We got a very acute specific piece of news about the relief effort in
Puerto Rico today, specifically about what are called disaster medical
assistance teams, DMATs, that our teams of doctors and nurses and
paramedics who deploy during natural disasters. This is a great resource
that the federal government has in terms of disaster response.
Well, today, we learned that the senior medical officer on one of the
federal DMAT teams in Puerto Rico, a doctor who has been on humanitarian
missions in 10 countries, a doctor who has done DMAT work in Haiti after
the earthquake there, in Japan after Fukushima, she has just quit her
disaster response team in Puerto Rico because she says what`s happening in
Puerto Rico is a response that`s being run in a way she has never seen in
her 20 years of federal disaster response experience.
Today, that doctor sent us these images which she says show a spa day that
was organized by federal medical staff health and human services medical
staff, a spa day they organized for themselves in the middle of the
disaster. This doctor tells us that they used the triage tents that are
supposed to be from medical care for Puerto Ricans, but instead they
brought in local Puerto Rican residents to give the medical workers cut-
rate manicures and pedicures, while these medical professionals were being
paid for their work as part of the disaster relief, but instead they were
getting spa treatments.
The senior medical officer wrote to her reporting officers at the
Department of Health and Human Services and told them, quote, I find this
gross use of – gross misuse of taxpayer funds and abuse of our privileged
physicians personally a – personally a – excuse me, personally abhorrent.
She pointed to the quote optics of NDMS medical personnel responsible for
seeing injured in ill Puerto Ricans who have no homes food or instead
having a spa day on taxpayer money.
Then she said, quote: I can no longer serve with honor on this team. And
then she quit, after more than 20 years of experience doing this work.
And her objections were not just that this is the way the federal response
is spending taxpayer money in Puerto Rico. This doctor told us that part
of her objection was that these were sterile environments. They`re
supposed to be. This is places where patients are supposed to be being
treated, but as you can see the medical professionals there were wearing
flip-flops instead of sterile scrubs and boots because they were drying
We reached out to the Department of Health and Human Services about this
today and they told us, quote: The National Disaster Medical System, NDMS,
has been made aware of the situation that this doctor has raised. NDMS has
initiated an internal inquiry regarding the matter and will take
appropriate action as necessary.
Last night, we reported on this maddening situation in which you have
people starting to die, Americans starting to die in Puerto Rico because of
treatable bacterial infections, infections they are getting because they
still three weeks on have no access to drinking water and so they`ve now
been so they`ve now been drinking for weeks out of creeks and streams.
People are starting to die from waterborne bacterial infections treatable
infections while apparently, spa day, but also while the USNS Comfort,
hospital ship, is docked in Puerto Rico. The Comfort has hundreds of beds.
It has 800 highly trained medical personnel, has state-of-the-art hospital
And as of Monday this week, the USNS Comfort was treating seven patients.
On Tuesday, it went up to eight. They have hundreds of beds, 800 medical
staff. They are treating eight people as of Tuesday while people were
dying of treatable bacterial infections at the hospitals on the island
where the Comfort is docked. Bacterial infections that people shouldn`t be
getting in the first place, one of the things the Comfort can do is
manufacture drinking water, but even people who get these infections should
not be dying from them because they are treatable if they can be treated.
But Americans are dying while this floating miracle of a hospital ship is
right there docked in Puerto Rico. What good is a floating miracle of a
ship if they`re not getting anybody on board to treat them?
What this is is an organizational failure. This is not the storm was too
big. This is not there`s no resources. The resources are there. The
trained staff are there.
This is not a matter of trying to summon resources. This is just
organizing it. This is leading the effort. This is just trying to connect
what`s available and what is needed.
This storm is no longer killing Americans. The federal government`s
response to this storm is now killing Americans, and we`ve got a live
report coming up. Stay with us.
MADDOW: We were expecting right now to be talking live with the mayor of
San Juan, the capital city of Puerto Rico. She is I`m told quite near to
our camera but not near enough yet. So, we will be going to be going to
her in just a moment.
We also though have Congressman Adam Schiff, the ranking member of the
House Intelligence Committee standing by. We`re going to be talking with
him in just a minute as well.
And in order to do that, I want to show you some impassioned comments from
Senator John McCain which we spoke on the Senate floor in late July.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
SEN. JOHN MCCAIN (R), ARIZONA: My friends, the United States of America
needs to send a strong message to Vladimir Putin and any other aggressor
that we will not tolerate attacks on our democracy. That`s what this bill
is all about.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
MADDOW: John McCain speaking in the Senate late July. It is rare for a
bill of much significance to get anything approaching blanket support in
Congress. But this summer, a bill to punish Russia for attacking our
election got approved in the Senate 98-2. In the House, the vote was 419-
3. If you combine both houses, which you`re not supposed to, that makes
the vote 517-5. Just overwhelming support in Congress for new sanctions on
Russia in response to them interfering in our election.
And the bill also included new protections for sanctions that were already
in place against Russia. So, President Trump couldn`t come in there and
mess with the existing sanctions. He couldn`t end those sanctions on his
That last part of the bill was not because of just hypothetical worries
that Trump might try something like that to help Russia out. He did try
something like that. On June 1st, Michael Isikoff of Yahoo News reported
that the Trump administration did try to get rid of existing Russian
sanctions the moment they first showed in Washington, D.C.
Quote, in the early weeks of the Trump administration, former Obama
administration officials and State Department staffers spot an intense
behind-the-scenes battle to head off efforts by incoming Trump officials to
normalize relations with Russia. Unknown to the public at the time, top
Trump administration officials almost as soon as they took office tasks
State Department staffers with developing proposals for the lifting of
economic sanctions on Russia and the return of Russia`s diplomatic
compounds. These efforts to relax or to remove punitive measures that had
been imposed against Russia alarmed some State Department officials who
immediately begin lobbying congressional leaders to quickly pass
legislation to block what the Trump administration was trying to do.
That`s why that bill that landed on the president`s desk, with all that
overwhelming support, that`s why it didn`t just call for a new punishment
against Russia for them messing with our election it was also designed to
stop Trump from trying to remove existing sanctions on Russia, because he
had already tried to do that from day one.
President Trump objected to that bill but he was up against those gigantic
veto-proof majorities and he signed it, signed it privately with no
pageantry. None of these – didn`t do any of that, signed it quietly
nobody there and then he left it to the Secretary of State Rex Tillerson to
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
REX TILLERSON, SECRETARY OF STATE: The action by the Congress to put these
sanctions in place in the way they did neither the president nor I are very
happy about that we were clear that we didn`t think it was going to be
helpful to our efforts but that`s the decision they made. They made it a
very overwhelming way. I think the president accepts that.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
MADDOW: And I`ll have to accept things we don`t like sometimes.
The president signed the Russia sanctions bill on August 2nd, and here`s
the interesting part. Signed it on August 2nd – the thing he signed, that
new law, gave him a deadline of October 1st to implement these new
sanctions against Russia, to punish them for attacking our election.
October 1st was the deadline. So, he signed at August 2nd, we waited all
through August. Then we waited all through September. It`s now October
12th, and those sanctions are not in place. He hasn`t done anything.
And now, the bipartisan sponsors of that sanctions bill are mad. John
McCain and Ben Cardin in the Senate have now written to the president,
quote: The delay calls into question the Trump administration`s commitment
to the sanctions bill which was signed into law more than two months ago.
Quote: They`ve had plenty of time to get their act together.
Maybe the White House, you know, will get around to doing something maybe
sometime or maybe they really did come into power with a burning desire for
some reason to help Russia out by easing up on the sanctions against them.
Joining us now is Congressman Adam Schiff. He`s the ranking member of the
House Intelligence Committee.
Congressman Schiff, it`s nice to see you. Thank you for being here.
REP. ADAM SCHIFF (D-CA), RANKING MEMBER, INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE: You bet.
MADDOW: Let me ask if you share the concerns about this sanctions matter.
The White House was supposed to have acted on this by October 1st. They
appear to have done nothing.
SCHIFF: I certainly do share the concern. I strongly supported the
legislation that was put in place, so that he couldn`t weaken the already
existing sanctions and to strengthen the deterrent on Russia from meddling
in our affairs. So, yes, I`m very concerned about it and, you know,
frankly, I`m not sure, and this is part of our investigation, whether this
is completely disconnected from your earlier story, and that is you were
pointing out how the same lawyer, the former Trump lawyer is now a lawyer
representing an oligarch close to Putin, an oligarch who helped set up that
meeting at Trump Tower.
And, of course, one of the things that is alleged in the dossier which we
are investigating and try to corroborate is the claim that there was an
agreement to ease sanctions on Ukraine, in exchange for getting derogatory
information about Hillary Clinton. If that is what is motivating this,
obviously, it would be consistent with the dossier.
Now, we don`t know that that`s the case but there are obviously a lot of
things that concern us about the president`s policy to Russia when you look
at all being vote that you pointed out both Democrats and Republicans
recognize the need to sanction Russia in this way and, of course, we have
profound questions about why the president differs from that very strong
MADDOW: You know, you referenced the dossier and what the dossier says
about how – if there was a quid pro quo here, it appears to have been or
it was it was supposed to have been described in the dossier as having been
about Russia wanting sanctions relief.
We had Mark Hosenball on the show last night, legendary investigative
reporter at “Reuters”. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is on the Judiciary
Committee in the Senate, told him for a piece this week, that when it comes
to the dossier, a good deal of the information and it remains unproven but
none of it has been disproven, and some of it have proven true. When he
said none of it has been disproven, that caught my eye, because I think a
lot of people assume that parts of the dossier have been disproven.
Can I ask if you – what you make of Senator Whitehouse`s assessment there,
if you share that?
SCHIFF: Well, I certainly share the view that there are parts of the
dossier that have been corroborated and that seemed credible. There are
other parts of the dossier that we`re trying to determine are they true,
are they not true, and you know, still other parts of the dossier I think
we`re not even close to being able to confirm or reject.
So, I think in a literal sense, that`s true. I don`t think we can disprove
parts of the dossier yet. But there`s a lot of work that remains to be
done and frankly, that`s where we ought to have at least part of our focus.
It shouldn`t be on trying to discredit the messenger but rather find out
how much of this dossier is accurate and that`s really what we`re trying to
MADDOW: The chairman of your committee, the Intelligence Committee, who
said he was stepping aside from the Russian investigation, Devin Nunes,
signed off on subpoenas this week or sometimes – not this week – signed
off sometimes recent – sometime recently. We found out this week
subpoenas targeting the firm that was behind the dossier, targeting Fusion
GPS. There`s been some confusion as to whether or not that was his
subpoena that he unilaterally decided to issue, even though he hasn`t been
participating in the investigation, thus far. There`s been some
conflicting reports as to whether you were consulted on that subpoena or
whether even other members of the committee on the Republican side we`re
committed – we`re consulted on that.
What can you tell us about that?
SCHIFF: We are supposed to be consulted as a matter of the committee
rules, but we were not consulted on it.
Look, I think that those subpoenas are part of an effort to create a
alternative narrative and the alternate narrative is that essentially the
FBI and the Department of Justice were hoodwinked into becoming an arm of
the opposition research to Donald Trump. It`s a variation of what you see
in criminal trials as I remember from being a prosecutor where if the
defense has very poor facts to deal with, they try to put the government on
trial. So this I think is a part of an effort not to get to the truth what
the Russians did, but rather to shift the focus on to the FBI and the
Department of Justice.
It`s really disservice. You know, these issues are incredibly serious. If
U.S. policy is being distorted either because of promises made or because
there is leverage over the administration, that`s serious business.
Those sanctions we were talking about a moment ago, the reason why those
are so significant, the reason why the Russians top priority is getting rid
of those sanctions is that Putin doesn`t fear losing a democratic election.
He`s not going to lose a democratic election. A viable opponent in Russia
now ends up in jail or dead.
But he does fear mass protests and the ability of people to gather and
demand better or true men demand the removal of an autocrat and if his
economy continues to suffer, then that is a threat to the regime. So, this
is why it was such a high priority for Putin to remove those sanctions, why
certainly if they`re willing if there was going to be a deal struck, it
would be about removing those sanctions and why so many members of Congress
in both parties questioned this administration where is it coming from, why
is it behaving this way to this adversary that intervened in our affairs.
And we took that step to protect ourselves but the investigation also has
to get to the bottom of this.
MADDOW: Top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Congressman Adam
Schiff – sir, thank you for your time tonight. Really appreciate it.
SCHIFF: Thanks, Rachel.
MADDOW: A key point there from the congressman in terms of how important
those important those sanctions are to Russia. What we may see them as
just one element of our policy towards Russia, that`s the prime mover for
them. And so, when you`re looking for people who are acting in their
interest, those are their interest when ask them.
The mayor of San Juan, Puerto Rico, joins us live next.
MADDOW: Take a look at how day 22 began today in Toa Baja. Toa Baja is
about half an hour west of San Juan, capital city of Puerto Rico. These
folks lost their homes in Hurricane Maria 22 days ago. They are living
inside a local school. That`s where they`ve been for the last three-plus
Toa Baja is not a remote mountain region. This is not interior mountainous
Puerto Rico. This is right outside the capital city.
And in Toa Baja today, people were collecting rain water from the gutters,
because that`s their access to water 22 days since the storm.
And today is the day the president started threatening to pull out federal
relief effort from Puerto Rico, federal relief effort such as it is.
Joining us now is the major of San Juan, Carmen Yulin Cruz.
Mayor Cruz, thank you very much for joining us. I know it`s still an
incredibly busy time.
MAYOR CARMEN YULIN CRUZ, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO: Thank you very much for
MADDOW: I do want to know your response to the president`s threat to
withdraw federal aid today. But more than that and before that, I want to
know how you are and how is San Juan and what`s your overall assessment of
your people and your city right now?
CRUZ: Well, number one, we`re entering the second phase of San Juan gets
back on its feet. The first phase was opening the roads and making sure
that we got to the elderly population in retirement homes, making sure that
we got to as many people that were sick as possible and ensuring they got
their medication. And ensuring that we established a robust distribution
system of food and drinkable water, enough to sustain people for initially
it was one week.
This week we started giving them provisions for two weeks so we have about
55,000 people in our system right now, with 18 community kitchens,
providing food for thousands of citizens of San Juan. And we are really,
really happy that the NGOs and the churches and leadership at the
communities are taking on the task of distributing. They come into a
central location and they take what they need and they distribute it to
So, we have now the capability of providing people with enough food. Not
enough water. But enough food for two weeks and enough water for at least
So, we are in the process of with Operation Blessing, comes from Virginia,
and NGO, putting water purification plans in different areas of San Juan.
And next week, we`re going to start delivering a – just a small
purification device for people to use in their homes. We`re starting to
see that we can get our two schools, three schools, municipal schools,
already working in the next week or so. About one third of our head starts
and early head starts will begin working in about a week. And our
community college has already started working.
All of our seven health clinics are working in terms of the emergency units
that they have. And we expect our hospital to be up and running, fully
operational next week. So, because of private donations, because I have to
say in the last week since we have had a direct route to Homeland Security,
FEMA has stepped up.
Are we getting everything we need? No. Are we getting much more than we
had last week? Certainly yes. And the channels of communication are
So, I can imagine the light at the end of the tunnel now. Of course, that
is not the case in many of the rest of the 77 municipalities today. We got
SOS calls from three municipalities in different parts of Puerto Rico
needing water, especially drinking water, needing medication, and needing
food because what I`ve been talking about, Ms. Maddow, is a robust supply
chain of aid.
I cannot feed ten families this week and forget them next week. We have to
have enough food to provide for them and we have been able to do that in
San Juan in two week cycles now, which helps us a lot in our distribution.
We are – we need to step up our game in terms of the debris. We haven`t
been able to get that under control in San Juan. Ever since Maria, we
picked up more than 66 million pound of debris and general trash. But
there`s still a lot more. So we have hired additional contractors today,
four different companies. Additional to the one that we have already at
the municipality to increase the power base we have in order to get that
MADDOW: Madam Mayor, we have been following with some concern these new
reports about people dying from water-borne illnesses and bacterial
infections. Not necessarily people in San Juan, but people in other parts
of Puerto Rico not as well-served. Obviously, you have been one of the
first people signaling the alarm that people in remote villages and cities
were having to drink from creeks and streams. That appears to be paying
off now in the form of treatable bacterial infections killing people.
We`re concerned about the basic medical care getting to people who are
being forced to live in the conditions. And people who are starting to die
from those conditions. Do you know anything about the overall plan for the
island in terms of that kind of medical care?
CRUZ: Yes. The secretary of health for Puerto Rico has advised in the
next coming days an educational program will begin to make sure that people
know how to – that they need to boil their water if they`re getting it.
That they need – if they`re getting it unfiltered water, they need to use
the chlorine pills to make it drinkable. They not only drink it but wash
everything that they use and not walk around with bare feet. Essentially,
don`t drink from any creeks.
We are having 50 community leaders tomorrow in San Juan to teach them and
say, because it`s not only, Ms. Maddow, just a drinking water. We are
having a very big problem because we are in a Caribbean island with mold.
So, if mold does not get taken out of the homes and those homes that need a
tarp, this kind of bluish FEMA tarp gets put on it, you`re really creating
a toxic environment from everybody in there.
So, the lack of drinking water, even in San Juan. You may think, well, we
are not drinking out of creeks but all of the creeks and rivers we get the
water from, you know, can turn out some sort of this bacteria. We have
already had reports in our own staff of two members that are suspected,
still not confirmed, of having diseases that are related to non-drinkable
Scabies is a problem. Conjunctivitis is a problem. Gastritis is a big
problem because people are not eating enough, or are not eating their
regular diet that they`re used to.
So, we are running into a situation where we may be in the verge of a
health crisis, without enough medication and without enough hospitals to
deal with. There is a hospital that`s on board of a ship from the United
States Navy, I believe. And people are being transported there. But I
have no information of how many patients, no confirmed information of how
many patients are already in there and for what conditions they have been
taken to the ship.
MADDOW: San Juan Mayor Carmen Yulin Cruz, really appreciate you keeping us
updated tonight, Madam Mayor. Please keep us apprised. Thank you for
being with us tonight.
CRUZ: Thank you very much.
MADDOW: Thank you.
All right. We`ll be right back. Stay with us.
MADDOWW: One last story for you tonight.
Amid all the taxpayer funded ethics trouble that Trump cabinet secretaries
have gotten into over the last few week, if you had to pick one cabinet
secretary who was really milking it, who was really pulling out the stops
to have the best possible time at taxpayer expense, no question, it`s
Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke and his boys` own adventure of taxpayer-
funded horseback rides and the private jet trip to go see the hockey team
and the other private jet trip to go on the snorkeling tour, and then to
the ski resort and then to the Alaskan steakhouse.
And now, we learned he also has his own personal flag and staff to raise
it, every time he goes to work. Quoting from “The Washington post”
tonight, an Interior Department staffer, quote, takes the elevator to the
seventh floor, climbs the stairs to the roof and hoists a special
secretarial flag whenever Ryan Zinke enters the building. When the
secretary goes home for the day or travels, the flag comes down.
Spokeswoman for Ryan Zinke calls the flag hoisting, quote, a major sign of
transparency, because now anything you want to know if someone`s rappelling
down the side of the Interior Department sometime soon, all you have to do
is look for the flag to see if he`s there, as soon as he leaves, somebody
runs up and takes it down.
It is a form of transparency. Other things, too. But – that does it for
us tonight. We will see you again tomorrow.
Now, it`s time for “THE LAST WORD” with Ali Velshi, filling in for Lawrence
Good evening, Ali.
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY
Copy: Content and programming copyright 2017 MSNBC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
Copyright 2017 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are
protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the
prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter
or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the