PoliticsNation with Al Sharpton, Transcript 12/13/2015

Bob Herbert; Matt Welch; Pamela Meanes; La Shawn Ford; Arne Duncan

Date: December 13, 2015
Guest: Bob Herbert; Matt Welch; Pamela Meanes; La Shawn Ford; Arne Duncan



UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Who is afraid of the big bad Trump? Two days before
the next debate, will any of Trump`s rivals attack him to his face.

DONALD TRUMP (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I`m not one of these other guys
that goes down. I don`t go down. I go up.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: And if they go too far will he run as an independent?

TRUMP: If the playing field is not level, then certainly all options are

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Also, outrage at the Supreme Court. New reaction to
Justice Scalia`s controversial comments about black students.

Crisis in Chicago, can the justice department fix what`s happening with
police in?

All that, plus, the exit interview. We talk to education Secretary Arne
Duncan who is going out with a bang as he heads into private life.

From Rockefeller center in New York this is “Politics Nation” with Al

REV. AL SHARPTON, MSNBC HOST: Good morning. I`m Al Sharpton.

Two days before the next Republican debate, party leaders are thinking the
unthinkable. What if Donald Trump wins the nomination? He has a 19-point
lead in a new national poll, and he has a message to Republicans who say he
will fall off.


TRUMP: They are kidding themselves. I`m going to win. I think I`m going
to win, you know. I`m not one of these other guys that goes down. I don`t
go down. I go up.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Do you have a warning for GOP leaders?

TRUMP: I say, folks, you know, I`m sorry I did this to you, but you got to
get used to it. It`s one of those little problems in life.


SHARPTON: Trump saying he is not going anywhere, even saying quote “I will
never leave this race.” But his top rival Ted Cruz apparently hopes he
does. In comments leaked from a fund-raiser, Cruz predicted both Trump and
Ben Carson will slide.


Donald and Ben. I do not believe either one of them is going to be our
nominee. With both of them, I think gravity is pulling them down. Who am
I comfortable having their finger on the button? Now that`s a question of
strength, but it`s also a question of judgment, and I think that is a
question that is a challenging question for both of them.


SHARPTON: Trump punched back tweeting “looks like Ted Cruz is getting
ready to attack. I`m leading by so much he must. I hope so. He will fall
like all others. Will be easy!”

This week “the Washington Post” was also reporting that the GOP
establishment is preparing to take down Trump at the party`s convention if
he gets that far. But Trump has a warning for Republican elites. He could
run as a third party candidate.


TRUMP: If they don`t treat me with a certain amount of decorum and
respect, if they don`t treat me as the front-runner, by far the front-
runner, if the playing field is not level, then certainly all options are

If I`m treated fairly, I would never do it. If I`m not treated fairly I
might very well do it.

If I`m considered fairly, I would certainly consider that. In fact, they
did a poll in one of the – I think with “USA Today,” where they said 68
percent of the people that were Republicans would follow Trump if he went



SHARPTON: Joining me now is Bob Herbert, former “New York Times” columnist
and distinguished senior fellow at DEMOS. MSNBC contributor Victoria
DeFrancesco, and Matt Welch, editor-in-chief of “Reason” magazine. Thank
you all for being here.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Great to be here.

SHARPTON: Bob, Trump to party leaders, you got to get used to it. Do

it`s still Trump is obviously way ahead in the polls of Republican voters,
but it`s got to be tough for him to actually secure the nomination before
the convention for two main reasons.

One because there are so many candidates in the race, so the votes divided
up among all the candidates and there`s no indication that a bunch of them
are going to drop out. And the second thing is the proportional voting in
so many of these states, so that even if you win a primary in a certain
state you don`t get all the delegates from that state.

So he may not have, you know, enough delegates going into the convention to
have it wrapped up.

SHARPTON: Matt, you`re the editor-in-chief of “Reason.” I mean, let`s be
reasonable. We have been saying for months, six months, so he is going to
fall, he is going to fall, every outrageous statement this is going to do
him in. He is still there. He is, in fact, going up. What is going to
derail him or will he be derailed?

the first poll that came out after his Muslims remarks came out Friday had
him unshaking at 35 percent. He is still up 20 on his nearest rivals.
They are not going anyway. And his supporters, Republicans, say only by
2:1 margin they were not offended by his comments in any way. So there is
some base in the Republican Party that is an audience for that. And that
is a problem.

However, the establishment has been fighting like cats and dogs to try to
get him out of the way because they are terrified of what he is going to do
to all the down ballot successes that the Republican Party has had in 2014.
They think that he is going to wipe them out.

Think about it. There`s no real Trumpian governor. There is no - there is
not many, not a Trump, you know, coalition inside Congress right now.

SHARPTON: So he is one-of-a-kind, and we are only brings that in,
Victoria, the down ballot, the governors, the senators, even Congress,
where they have a wide margin right now, they`re concerned about. They are
really looking at the possibility of a broken convention.

DEFRANCESCO: They are. And picking up on Matt`s comment, there is isn`t a
coalition of Trumpians yet is what I want to say, but we saw in one of the
leaked memos from the RNC saying to those down ballot folks, be Trump.
Don`t fight Trump. Roll with it. So the RNC even though it`s scared of
Trump does recognize the power that he has to marshal folks. The question
is, are these folks going to turn out?

We know that over a third of Republicans support Trump. But the question,
Reverend, is are those folks going to come out and vote in the primaries
and then eventually in the general election. So that`s the big question
mark that is hovering over us. It`s unquestionable that Trump has support,
but is that support transferrable into office?

SHARPTON: You have watched politics and social movements closer and have
been very, very poignant in your analysis for a while now.

HERBERT: All the time.

SHARPTON: I have studied you so explain when Victoria says they understand
the power of Trump. What is the power of Trump?

HERBERT: The power of Trump is I think that his real genius is self-
promotion. I mean, I have never seen anything like it. And he actually
will say anything. And people, especially politicians, public figures, they
hate to see themselves trashed in public, even if it`s an unfair attack.

But I think that can only get you so far. Trump is actually a runaway
train here now. And I think that the GOP is headed for a colossal train
wreck, whether he gets the nomination or not. If he doesn`t get the
nomination, the party is going to be fractured in perhaps a million pieces.
If he does get the nomination, there is a good chance that he goes down in
a heap against the Democrats, because the people who are so much pro-Trump
do not represent by any means a majority of Americans. So it`s the
possibility of a huge election victory in the presidential election for the
Democrats, Hillary Clinton, if she`s the nominee. And then she may have
coat tails, and then you`re talking about Congress and state races and that
sort of thing.

SHARPTON: You know, and Victoria, you are talking about a real change in
American politics, if, in fact, this continues to play out this way. And
yet at the same time it doesn`t appear like he is going anywhere. And to
Bob`s point about these guys not wanting to be attacked as soon as it came
out with Ted Cruz said that the fund raiser was leaked out, the tape, he
tweeted “Trump is terrific.” I mean, so it`s like nobody wants to get in
the ring with this guy, even though he has said some outrageous stuff, they
kind of let it go.

DEFRANCESCO: They are scared of him and they can read numbers well. Ted
Cruz, whatever you think about him, is incredibly smart. And Ted Cruz
knows that if he can just coast behind Donald Trump and keep the Donald
Trump folks happy, and at the same time start cultivating that evangelical
vote in Iowa and in the southern states he has a real shot at it.

But look, these guys are not dumb and they know the numbers that Donald
Trump has are undeniable, so that`s why we see them very cautious about
wanting to go Trump.

SHARPTON: Matt, some of those numbers are driven by the fear around
terrorism, a legitimate fear that a lot of Americans v the impact of the
terror concerns. “The Washington Post” reports several GOP power brokers
are arguing the party`s establishment must lay the groundwork for a floor
fight. But at the same time, Americans concerned about terror haven`t been
this high since 9/11, Matt. At the 9/11, 78 percent thought it was likely
another attack was likely within a few months. Today, 79 percent believe
that. Is that helping to fuel Trump`s rise?

WELCH: Absolutely. And there is this perception and it conflates with
reality on some levels that people have this anti-elitist thing. The Trump
support isn`t necessarily just anti-Obama or anti-Democrat. Hell of a lot
of it is anti-Republican. It`s anti-media perhaps more than anything else.
And there is a perception that the people who control or run Washington are
ineffectual at best and they are actively corrupt at worse. And they apply
this to the fight against terrorism, they apply this to economics, to
fairness and a lot of different things. So that group goes to Trump.

The public perception in this country changed I think when the rise of
ISIS. When we first saw beheadings on You Tube live that changed the
needle on American foreign policy. In 2013 Rand Paul was up ahead and he
is nowhere right now because the climate, I think, has really changed from
out from under his feet.

SHARPTON: But isn`t that the difference, Bob, between a Rand Paul, even a
Herman Cain when we keep hearing his analogies. The difference is that
Americans have changed in terms of they feel threatened, there is an
insecurity we didn`t have before.

HERBERT: I completely agree. So Trump is now showing strength. Folks are
not necessarily you know, getting down in the weeds on the specific issues
or on specific foreign policy, strategies or tactics or anything like that,
you know. Trump presents a figure of strength, whether it`s real or not,
doesn`t really matter and people are looking for a strong leader right now.
But I think you make a really good point about the fears are kind of
conflated. It`s not just the fear of terrorism, although that`s a big
deal, but that gets conflated with these mass shootings that have nothing
to do with the Middle East, for example.


HERBERT: And then also the economic problems that so many of the Trump
supporters have been facing, so you talk about the anti-government aspect.
They don`t feel that the government is working for them. And all of that I
think comes together and fuels this anti-establishment.

SHARPTON: Victoria, when you look at the global threat of terrorism, the
economic as Bob talks about, the gun violence, the mass shootings, even the
social unrest legitimate protest that some of us are in, all of that, it
remind me when I was a kid `68, Richard Nixon won because people wanted
somebody they wanted to take charge, calm everything down.

DEFRANCESCO: It`s fear. And for better or for worse, fear is a motivating
factor in politics, in how we act and how we vote. And what Donald Trump
has done is he has tapped into that fear and things that we would normally
consider extreme are being accepted as reasonable because there is so much
fear in the mix. So the idea of excluding persons of Islamic descent.

Normally that would seem outrageous. But now there`s fear, folks are
saying hey maybe that makes sense. Think back to the Japanese internment
or think back to the Chinese exclusion act. Those things happened because
there was an environment of fear, whether economic fear with the Chinese
exclusion act or foreign policy fear with Japanese internments.

HERBERT: I think Trump –

SHARPTON: All of you one minute. Stay with us. There`s a lot more ahead.
We will be back.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Coming up, Justice Scalia`s controversial comments
about black students, and what they mean for affirmative action.

Plus, outrage in Chicago, and a mayor under fire, as policing issues come
to a head.




SEN. HARRY REID (D-NV), MINORITY LEADER: It was deeply disturbing to hear
the Supreme Court justice endorsed racist ideas from the bench, the
nation`s highest court.


SHARPTON: Senate minority Harry Reid speaking out against those
controversial comments from Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia. It came
during arguments over a case from Texas that could overturn affirmative


JUSTICE ANTONIN SCALIA, SUPREME COURT: There are those who contend that it
does not benefit Africa-American to get them into the University of Texas
where they do not do well. As opposed to having them go to a less-advanced
school, a less- a slower-track school were they do well.


SHARPTON: Justice Scalia went on it suggest that some black students can`t
keep up with classes at better schools.


SCALIA: Most of the - most of the black scientists in this country don`t
come from schools like the University of Texas.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So this court –

SCALIA: From lesser schools where they do not feel that they`re - that
they are being pushed ahead in classes that are too - too fast for them.


SHARPTON: I was there in the court for this and many in the room were
stunned by these comments. I talked about all this with Pamela Meanes,
former president of the National Bar Association, the country`s oldest and
largest group of African-American attorneys and judges. I asked about her


Sharpton, if you look at what Justice Scalia said, which he was quoting
from a brief that he doesn`t identify, and he was espousing this mismatch
theory which is that when you admit African-Americans or individuals not
qualified to a school, as they say, to schools that are very prestigious,
that you are doing them a disservice by doing that.

As an attorney, when I hear something like that, it takes me back to the
civil rights era, where individuals were being very (INAUDIBLE) about
whether or not we should eat in certain locations, whether or not we should
attend certain schools, or whether or not we should sit in certain
locations because they were doing what was in our best interests.

SHARPTON: The attorney for the University of Texas, he referenced even
going further than you, when you said the civil rights era. He went to the
`50s to separate but equal. Let me give you the sound of what the attorney
for the University of Texas had to say in the hearing.

solution to the problems with student body diversity can be to set up a
system in which not only are minorities going to separate schools, they`re
going to inferior schools. Now is not the time and this is not the case to
roll back student body diversity in America.

SHARPTON: Not only separate school but inferior schools which is really
what Brown versus the board of education was about. Really in response to
Judge Scalia`s statement, because he was really saying, inferring that
you`re bringing us back to separate but equal, talking about these kinds of
things, Judge Scalia.

MEANES: That`s exactly correct. And that is where they are headed. But
we know that separate but equal did not always equal and in separate and it
being equal. In fact, it ended up being separate and inferior. But what
we want to be very careful as we talk about schools that African-Americans
tend to go to, we don`t want to immediately label those schools as inferior
to counter an argument.


MEANES: What we want to say is that an African-American, just like a white
American, Hispanic-American and Asian-American, should have the opportunity
to go to any university that they choose. And that there should be a fair
chance for them to happen, this to happen.

And Reverend Sharpton, if we look at the Texas plan, what we find that they
don`t use race to admit all the individuals that they bring in. They only
use race in the holistic program in which they use race as a factor.

SHARPTON: Yes, one of several - many in fact. In fact, it is the last one
on the list, they talk about residency, whether you come from a parent,
what language is spoken at home, all kinds of things, you know, your
grades. But let me also debunk something with the theory that he quoted
from. And that is that, when you look at the black student graduation rate
at the University of Texas at Austin, 69.6 percent graduate from the
University of Texas at Austin at a higher rate than the other schools that
he claimed were not as at the same level. So the facts that he used from
the brief don`t even really stand the light of day, because they are not
actual facts.

MEANES: Well, Reverend Sharpton, you know we are used to this. We are
used to individuals selectively giving out information, without being
holistic in their approach. And what you do when you do that is you
piecemeal together information that supports your position, and we then
utilize that to shut the door to other individuals.

It`s not fair. It`s not right. And the discussion that`s taken place as a
result of Scalia`s comment is an appropriate discussion. But it really
does open the door to let us see what`s going on in America today,
individual`s fears are certain groups, the fact that we should not allow
certain individuals to do certain things. Education is always a hallmark.
Any time we close the door of access to individuals we don`t make America

SHARPTON: You`re exactly right. And that is why at the end of the day, we
can have different opinions. We can`t have different facts.

MEANES: That`s right.

SHARPTON: Not only as I sat in that courtroom was I offended by the
inference, the facts just are not there.

Thank you for your time this morning.

MEANES: Thank you for staying on top of the issues, reverend Sharpton.
Your voice is always need.

SHARPTON: Thank you.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Ahead, spotlight on Chicago policing. The “Politics
Nation” interview with a lawmaker behind the bill to recall the mayor.

And in 2016 politics, Trump`s rivals search for a strategy.




MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL (D), CHICAGO: The problem is sometimes referred to as
the thin blue line. The problem is other times referred to as the code of
silence. It is a tendency in some cases to cover up the bad actions of a
colleague or colleagues.


SHARPTON: Chicago mayor Rahm Emanuel talking about his city`s police
department and facing growing outrage over the handling of the police
shooting death of 17-year-old Laquan McDonald. Protesters filled the
streets, asking for the mayor`s resignation and demanding to note if there
has been a cover-up.

A federal grand jury is reportedly looking into whether there was any
obstruction of justice after Laquan`s death. And now the justice
department will review whether the department has a pattern of violating
civil rights.

Critics say that patent goes back decades. Just this year the city
approved over $5 million in reparations to victims of police torture from
the `70s and `80s.

Joining me now from Chicago is state representative La Shawn Ford. He
introduced the bill that would let Mayor Emanuel be removed from office by
a recall vote. Thanks for being here first of all.

STATE REP. LA SHAWN FORD (D), ILLINOIS: Well, thank you Reverend and
thanks for always keeping it real.

SHARPTON: Thank you. Now first let me ask you this, Laquan`s shooting
exposes what a lot of people in Chicago have known for a long time, that
there is something wrong in the country`s second largest police force.
Would you agree with that?

FORD: I think you are absolutely right. It is what you have been saying
for a very long time.

SHARPTON: Now, let me ask you. What are the remaining unanswered
questions about Laquan`s death, and the police shootings around it?

FORD: The number one question is, why was the tape suppressed, and not
released for 14 months or so. And did the mayor of the city of Chicago
knowingly hold the tape back from the citizens. That`s the number one
question that people are saying that he knew better and that he decided to
hold the tape so he could be reelected.

SHARPTON: One of things that strikes a lot of people that I spoke with in
Chicago and people around the country need to know is that on the 23rd of
November, the mayor said, one individual needs to be held accountable in
Laquan`s shooting. What is your reaction to that?

FORD: Well, we know that it`s a whole department. It`s the Chicago police
department. It`s the mayor`s office, and it`s also the state`s attorney`s

SHARPTON: The city has paid $521 million in settlement related to abuse
over the last decade, according to the “Chicago Sun Times.” I mean, to
spend over a half billion dollars on related settlements that are related
to abuse while you`re closing schools, I remember 50 schools were closed at
one time, and how do you act as though this is an isolated incident?

FORD: And for the mayor of the city of Chicago to say that he did not know
about it, you know, it`s actually, how could you run for re-election, be
the mayor for four years, run for re-election and not know that your city
is corrupt, not know that your police department is racist, not know that
people are being mistreated in your city?

If it`s true that he really didn`t know that the culture of his police
department was racist and that it treated black people and Latinos in a
different way than they treat people in his own family, it means he can`t
be the mayor for the entire city and he should resign.

SHARPTON: You proposed legislation to allow for a recall and of course
you`re going to deal with a legislative vote on that and the legalities.
Is there anything the mayor can do to restore trust with the city of
Chicago and those community residents who seem to be growing, that is
calling for his removal?

FORD: You know, right now, his approval rating is down. His trust factor
is down, and people have lost confidence in the mayor. You know, I`m still
hoping and praying that he does everything that he can to make Chicago
great. But until he does that, and until he figures out what it is that he
needs to do, I will say no. But right now, I don`t think he understands
the city, so I don`t think he could do anything in order to change the
hearts and minds of the people in the city of Chicago.

SHARPTON: We`ll stay on this.

Illinois state representative La Shawn Ford, thank you for your time this

FORD: And I really appreciate all your work. Thank you, Reverend Al


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Still to come, the next GOP debate, do Trump`s rivals
fight him or befriend him.

And the exit interview, outgoing education secretary Arnie Duncan on
“Politics Nation.”




SHARPTON: Donald Trump in a close encounter with the bold eagle. The
video went viral. It was from a photo shoot with “Time” magazine, some
people thought Trump looked a little bit nervous, but he says he wasn`t
scared of the eagle at all.

Politically Trump also sounds confident, declaring that he will win the
nomination, and refusing to back down from any of his controversial


TRUMP: We can`t worry about being politically correct. There is nobody in
this country, if I want it to be, that could be more politically correct
than me. Nobody.


TRUMP: Not at all. Probably the least of anybody you have ever met. I am
the least racist person that you`ve ever met. I am the least racist

I have many good friends who are Muslims, they`re terrific people and they
are calling me on an hourly basis thanking me for bringing up this point.


SHARPTON: Two days before the next GOP debate, is there a candidate ready
to take on Trump? A recent poll shows Ted Cruz ahead of Trump in Iowa,
where he just picked up a key endorsement. And Chris Christie is up six
points in New Hampshire. But Senator Lindsey Graham says Trump`s support
in the GOP base runs deep and that it`s almost irrational.


40 percent of the Republican primary voter who believe that Obama was born
in Kenya and is a Muslim, you know. There is just a dislike for President
Obama that is visceral. It`s almost irrational.



UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Coming up, the “Politics Nation” panel weighs in on the
GOP fight.



SHARPTON: We are back with our panel focusing on the GOP fight, two days
before the next debate. I`m with Bob Herbert, former “New York Times”
columnist and distinguished senior figure at DEMOS, MSNBC contributor
Victoria DeFrancesco, and Matt Welch of “Reason” magazine. Thank you for
being here.

Who can take Trump down? Matt, if you look at the poll of GOP voters in
New Hampshire, let`s look at New Hampshire, 27 percent Donald Trump, 27
percent establishment candidates, Christie, Kasich and Jeb Bush combined.
I mean, if the field gets whittled down, would one single establishment
candidate be able to coalesce all of that?

WELCH: I think the only establishment candidate with a prayer right now is
Marco Rubio. Jeb Bush is DOA. I mean, he is in the three percent club
right now with basically the rest of the Huckabees and Fiorinas and
everybody else like that.

Chris Christie has shown a pulse in New Hampshire which is interesting, but
Chris Christie hasn`t polled above five percent nationally since May. And,
you know, he has put all of his eggs in New Hampshire. He is known there
because he is nearby. I don`t think that his act is going to play very
well in South Carolina. So I think Iowa is going to be the key more.

Ted Cruz I think has a very legitimate shot of beating Trump in Iowa, which
changes the way that we talk about this election for a moment. And
basically polls, national polls in the primary elections usually don`t
matter until after thanksgiving. So all of this noise so far has been
really entertaining. We have all been watching it. But we don`t know what
it means until right about now. And I think Ted Cruz could change that
which again is not something that the establishment is going to love
because he has seen as anti-establishment as well.

SHARPTON: Bob, does Cruz maintain a momentum and keep growing because he
is right, polls before thanksgiving really are not that serious. Even on
the Democratic side, I remember 2004 about this time in our race, Howard
Dean was the nominee.

HERBERT: Exactly.

SHARPTON: He ended up coming in three in Iowa.

HERBERT: No, I agree. I mean, Cruz could take Iowa. The other thing is,
elections are just, by nature, uncertain. These elections, this campaign
is getting so much attention. I think you`re going to have really big
turnouts in these elections. And when that happens, you know, it`s very
hard to gauge what the outcome is going to be.

The thing about Marco Rubio though, is, I always hear the pundits and I
hear the establishment Republicans talking about Marco Rubio. But when I
talk to ordinary voters, Republican and conservative voters, his name does
not come up spontaneously. I mean, I hear Cruz much more often and I hear
Chris Christie much more often.

SHARPTON: Then how important is the debate then? Because the next one is
not until two weeks before Iowa. How important is the debate in two

DEFRANCESCO: I think the debate is very important for everyone except
Donald Trump. I think the debate is going to be of particular importance
to Ted Cruz and to Marco Rubio. I do think that Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz,
the two Cuban-American candidates are going to be could be contesting it,
with Trump still in the mix, but we are going to see Ted Cruz and Marco

SHARPTON: You mean in the debate?

DEFRANCESCO: In the debate and throughout the election. In my informal
polling, Bob, down in Texas where I live, Ted Cruz obviously comes up a
lot, but I still hear a lot of Marco Rubio chatter especially given that
Jeb Bush is DOA. So the folks who used to like Jeb Bush and maybe lean
toward Jeb Bush and like the other moderates, they are gravitating more and
more for Marco Rubio. So the moderate Republicans are alive and well.
They are just keeping their heads down.

SHARPTON: So if we, I guess all of us have said that Bush is a non-factor,
I guess Carson is not coming back in your judgment?

WELCH: Well, I wouldn`t rule that out. He has also hinted at going off to
an independent run in the wake of “the Washington Post” reporting about a
brokered convention. He actually has a lot at stake at this debate because
he has seen kind of a distracted and unfocused and unknowledgeable
particularly on foreign affairs. If everyone is focused on terrorism right
now is he your go-to guy? So I think he needs to show something here. And
he also doesn`t have much in terms of actual ground game there. He is
spending his money very unwisely in the campaign so far. So he has to show
something or else he might disappear.

SHARPTON: How good is the Trump campaign for Hillary Clinton? Because let
me show you, Hillary really went after Donald Trump.


longer think he is funny. And what he`s saying now is not only shameful
and wrong, it is dangerous. I think everybody and especially the
Republicans need to stand up and really say enough. You`ve gone too far.


SHARPTON: I mean, how good is Trump for her? She had a rough summer and
he`s kind of like –.

HERBERT: This is fantastic for Hillary and for the Democrats in general.
But I have to say to see Hillary Clinton on television saying, you know,
well, now he doesn`t seem funny anymore. Did he seem funny when he was
talking about Mexicans as rapists and criminals or when he said those
disgusting things about women, you know, when he mocked the “New York
Times” reporter. Trump has not been funny during any of this campaign.

SHARPTON: I didn`t see the humor even in the birther thing before the

But as the Democrats watch this, they are also looking as we talked about
earlier in the show, the down parts of the Congress, Senate. So Trump can
help not only Hillary, Trump can really help congressional candidates,
Senate candidates, gubernatorial candidates.

DEFRANCESCO: And all politics is local, Reverend. So even though Congress
matters and the White House matters, but our governors, who is at the state
house matters. That being said, I am still cautious. I think Donald Trump
helps a democratic nominee. But at the same time I don`t know who is
turning out to vote.

SHARPTON: But does he hurt the lower card for lack of a better term?

WELCH: It depends on if he`s going to run as an independent or not.
That`s the wild card here. I think chances are strong that he might, that
he will do that. If he runs as an independent it helps and hurts at the
same time. It hurts in the sense that Hillary Clinton will become the next
president. It hurts in the sense that he might get more votes than the
Republican. However, Republicans can say look, we distanced ourselves
finally from the guy saying this stuff. Meanwhile he is going to get his
people out to the polls and they`re more likely to vote down the ballot

SHARPTON: You know, a billionaire independent helped the first Clinton get
in, so history may repeat itself. If Trump brings a democratic Congress
about, maybe he will help make America great again.

Bob Herbert, Victoria DeFrancesco and Matt Welch, thank you. Enjoy the
rest of your weekend.

WELCH: Thank you.


HERBERT: Thanks.


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Ahead, the exit interview, one on one with education
secretary Arne Duncan, a key Obama ally leaving his post after seven years.



SHARPTON: One of President Obama`s longest serving cabinet members is
stepping down. Arne Duncan has been education secretary since the start of
the Obama administration. He will leave at the end of this month. His
influence has been historic. He drove the race to the top program. He
steered billions in stimulus funding to prevent massive teacher layoffs.
And he fended off attacks from Republicans, including presidential
candidates, who would abolish the department of education.


department of education.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I don`t think you`d notice if the whole department were
gone tomorrow.

TRUMP: I may cut department of education.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Why have a federal department of education? It`s
flunked and it needs to be expelled.


SHARPTON: As a final act, Duncan fought for the major education bill
signed by President Obama just days ago, a fix to the Bush era no child
left behind law. I caught up with Secretary Duncan moments after the bill
was signed and asked him about its impact.


ARNE DUNCAN, SECRETARY OF EDUCATION: Well, there were so many things that
were broken with the no child left behind law. It was very punitive. It
was very prescriptive. It was top down. The law and broken for a lot of
time. Unfortunately, Reverend, as you know, Congress has been broken for a
long time, pretty dysfunctional. So this law is probably six, seven, eight
years overdue to be fixed. But finally Congress came together in a
bipartisan way to do the right thing for children. And there are a couple
of things in there I think are so important.

First, for the first time ever, this bill focuses on early childhood
education. And you and I know every parent knows that learning doesn`t
begin at age five at kindergarten. It begins at birth. And so, having
Congress step up and put that into the law was a huge step in the right

Secondly it`s important that we stay true to the civil rights nature of
this bill. It came out in 1965 in making sure we are focused on closing
the achievement gaps, turning around underperforming schools, ending those
dropout factors. We have to do those things.

SHARPTON: You know, the president at the signing was very much full of
praise for your work. And under your tenure, 81 percent high school
graduation rate, historic high, 30 plus states pushing new early childhood
education initiatives.

What are you most proud of? I was honored to work with you on many
occasions through your tenure, including our tour with Newt Gingrich. What
are your proud moments that you leave office the end of this month?

DUNCAN: Well, the tour with you and Newt was one of the highlights. I got
to say, that was a lot of fun.


DUNCAN: It actually really was. But beyond that it`s been an amazing
partnering with you in so many different things. But again, the focus on
early childhood education I think that is the most important thing we can
do. We put more than more than a billion-dollars to increase access to
high quality early learning. The fact as you said that graduation rates
are at historic highs, 81 percent, dropout rates are down very
significantly, cut by 45 percent in the black community. So proud of the

But as you know so well, we have so much further to go. There are so many
children that we have to better educate that our children`s interests, our
family`s interests, our nation`s interests. So the question for me is how
do we accelerate the pace of change and get better faster.

SHARPTON: How do you react to some GOP candidates saying that we should
abolish the department of education?

DUNCAN: Well, this should be nothing political about education. It should
be the ultimate bipartisan issue and again, you saw just the perfect
example of that this week, where folks who disagree on lots of issues came
together. This is not the perfect bill. It is not the bill any one of us
individually would have written, but it is a very, very good bill and
improved dramatically from the house started and the Senate started.

But this is in our nation`s interest. I always say it, a strong military
is our best defense. But a great educational system is the best offensive
thing, the best offensive strategy we could have.

SHARPTON: Now, you come from Chicago. You have been noted to be one of
the close, if not closest cabinet members to President Obama. How has he
changed over the last seven years?

DUNCAN: Well, it`s amazing to me how he hasn`t changed. And he is still
just fundamentally an unbelievably good person with an amazing heart at his
core. And the fact that Washington hasn`t changed him, hasn`t changed his
values, hasn`t changed what he stands for, I can`t tell you how much I
appreciate that.

And I came to Washington not because I wanted to be secretary of education.
That was not my lifelong ambition. I simply wanted to be part of President
Obama`s team. And I can`t tell you how proud I have been to have the
chance to serve with him, and to learn from him, his values, his commitment
to helping those who need the most help.

Every hard decision, Reverend, every hard decision having to do with
education he simply said what`s the right thing to do for children, and he
would handle the politics.

SHARPTON: What`s next for Arne Duncan?

DUNCAN: You know, it`s very bittersweet, really sad to leave this work and
to leave Washington. But as you may know my family moved back to Chicago
this summer. And it`s been very hard on all of us, my wife, my kids and I,
trying to do this commuting thing. And so I`m going home to Chicago at the
end of the year. I`m going to desperately miss our work here and our team
here. But it`s the right thing for my family. And I`ll figure out what to
do next as we go into the New Year.

SHARPTON: Well, thank you so much for being with us. And thank you for
your service to the country, secretary of education, Arne Duncan.

DUNCAN: Back at you, thanks so much for being an amazing partner.


SHARPTON: That does it for me. Thanks for watching. I will see you back
here next Sunday.



Transcription Copyright 2015 ASC LLC ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No license is
granted to the user of this material other than for research. User may not
reproduce or redistribute the material except for user`s personal or
internal use and, in such case, only one copy may be printed, nor shall
user use any material for commercial purposes or in any fashion that may
infringe upon MSNBC and ASC LLC`s copyright or other proprietary rights or
interests in the material. This is not a legal transcript for purposes of