shooting of Georgia man TRANSCRIPT: 5/8/20, The Beat w/ Ari Melber

Hakeem Jeffries, Joseph Cartagena, Adam Schiff, Bill Kristol, Jon Meacham


ARI MELBER, MSNBC HOST: Welcome to THE BEAT. I`m Ari Melber.


And we have a lot in tonight`s show. Later, an update on a story we have

been covering all week, an unarmed black jogger gunned down in broad

daylight. This was back in February. Now developing news on the story, two

men arrested for murder in Georgia, many say that action long overdue –

that story later tonight.


Meanwhile, Attorney General Barr under fire for alleged political meddling.

Congressman Schiff joins me live.


And by the end of the hour, we turn to hope and art, Fat Joe back on THE



But we begin right now with coronavirus inside the West Wing: a top aide to

Vice President Pence testing positive.





woman, Katie. She tested very good for a long period of time, and then all

of the sudden today she tested positive.


She hasn`t come into contact with me. She spent some time with the vice

president. It`s, I believe, the press person, right? It`s a press person.

So, she tested positive out of the blue.




MELBER: That Katie is Katie Miller. She is Vice President Pence`s press

secretary. She is married to Trump aid Stephen Miller, as you may recall.


He`s actually one of Donald Trump`s longest-serving and closest aides. In

an administration with all kinds of turnover, Miller has been there the

whole time. He has a personal and longstanding relationship with the

president. He writes speeches for him. They spend time together, which is



The White House staff will now be tested every day for coronavirus in this

climate. And that is what`s happening there in Washington as they grapple

with the problems that everyone is grappling with. But they don`t have all

of the same problems, because, beyond the public health crisis, we`re

living through an economic one.


I`m sure you know about that. And I want to give you some update on this

ongoing humanitarian toll.


The U.S. work force facing basically devastation. More than 20 million jobs

lost in this month of April that we just completed. One in five people in

the labor force are now unemployed, basically, people who had jobs and are

seeking work.


If you translate that out, you have this staggering unemployment rate of

14.7 percent. If that looks high to you, you`re right. It is. It is the

highest since the Great Depression.




UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I`m on week seven of not receiving any unemployment

benefits. Just like when you would call a radio station to try to win

concert tickets, that`s how you have to call unemployment.


UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: The possibility, you know, of losing our house, losing

our truck, and it`s – as a granddaughter, knowing that that could happen,

it terrifies me.




MELBER: A few voices among the millions for what we are all going through

as a nation. And it is going to be, obviously, a long road.


We`re joined now by Dr. Natalie Azar, rheumatologist at NYU Langone Medical

Center, Jon Meacham, Pulitzer Prize-winning presidential historian, and

Bill Kristol, director of the group Defending Democracies Together.


I want to begin with you, Jon, because we draw on history here, obviously,

to try to get our heads around the scale of what people are living through.

There is the public health crisis, and then there is what we continue to

see, a growing economic one.


What do you see here in the parallels in history to the rare times when

it`s been this bad in the work force?


JON MEACHAM, PRESIDENTIAL HISTORIAN: Well, in the winter of 1933, – there

was one out of every four American men, we think, were out of work.

Statistics are hard to come by there.


But John Maynard Keynes, the great economist, was asked, has there ever

been anything like the Depression before. And he said, yes, it was called

the Dark Ages and it lasted 400 years. And so we are in a deep crisis.


The question for us now is, what do we do with it? Crises can pass, but

they have to be addressed. And simply wishing it away is not going to work.

The good news is, FDR got some things right, some things wrong. He set up a

political dynamic that, for the next 80 years, the tension between where

Ronald Reagan stood and where FDR stood really governed American politics.


And Bill knows this incredibly well. He was part of it. You governed and

you fought, but you did so on a coherent field. And it was a field really

built by FDR, Reagan, Lyndon Johnson. In many ways, the Reagan Revolution

was a response not to the New Deal as much as it was to the Great Society.


So it`s a moment of enormous political import. The decision we`re going

make in November is extraordinary. Also, for Democrats, who are very

worried at this point, I would remind people that I can`t think of an era

of crisis, except for 1864, where the incumbent governing party, in this

case, the Republicans, because they hold the White House, actually won.


And so this is a moment, it seems to me, to make a coherent case that there

are answers here and that it`s time to change the channel.


MELBER: And on that point, to Bill Kristol, who you mentioned, Joe Biden is

sharpening a message about what he calls a corrupt and failed Trump

recovery process. Take a look.




JOSEPH BIDEN (D), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: We`re already seeing telltale

hallmarks of Trumponomics, in the way he`s going about implementing the

crisis response efforts, no strings, no oversight, no accountability.


I started to think of this as the corrupt recovery.







also, jumping into 1933, it`s the 75th anniversary of V.E. Day, 1945.


I actually listened to Churchill and Truman`s addresses to their respective

nation last night. You can do that easily on YouTube, obviously. And it is

a reminder that we have been through awfully tough times economically, but

also a world war and all the horrors of that, and came through.


But we came through with real leadership. And I would just would make Jon`s

point, the wishful thinking is what really, I think, is so damaging in a

way. The lying and the stupidity and the ridiculous things Trump does is

one thing.


But the degree to which he is not leading a federal government that is

seriously addressing this crisis and making mistakes, as, of course, you

would, especially early on, but then correcting those mistakes, as FDR did

and as we did in World War II, and being serious about what we`re learning,

especially this wishfulness that we can somehow wish the economy back

without dealing seriously with the public health problem.


The masks thing is so tiny and silly in a way, but it`s very revealing.

People aren`t going to go out to restaurants and to all the – on airplanes

and so forth unless they feel safe, and one way they can feel safe is by

widespread use of masks.


And this kind of silly, childish, pseudo-macho protest that I`m not wearing

a mask, I`m too tough, do people not understand that – they`re in favor of

opening up. This delays the possibility of opening up.




KRISTOL: I`m not going to a restaurant if some jerk five feet from me has

decided he is not going to wear a mask.


A friend of mine was telling a story. I won`t say where exactly, but he

went to a hospital for a routine procedure. They asked him to put on a

mask. Of course he did. As soon as he came in, they gave him one. He didn`t

have it with him, but he was happy to do it, of course.


A guy behind him, middle-aged, businessman, not a kind of riffraff type,

shows us. They said, sir – he is next in line. He`s checking in. Sir, you

will have to wear a mask. I don`t want to wear a mask. Well, sir, it`s a

procedure, a hospital requirement.


I don`t – the Democrats doing this, we don`t need masks, this is all

ridiculous and un-American.


Finally, they had an argument and a argument with a very nice receptionist,

and the security guard had to escort this guy out.


What is going on that people are being so childish and irresponsible?


MELBER: Yes. And, as you say, it goes to leadership. It goes to our



There is nothing – quote, unquote – “tough” about possibly infecting

other people because you`re asymptomatic. It`s irresponsible. It`s stupid

if you have been informed of the warning now, as we have all learned as we

go. It`s certainly not tough.


Before I bring in the doctor, I want to play one other thing for Bill

Kristol that merges these.


Also, Bill, you know I`m a – I try to listen closely to you. In addition

to all the deep insights you shared, I believe you revealed that late at

night you`re home watching Winston Churchill speeches on YouTube, which





KRISTOL: You think that`s a little – I also watch mysteries on TV. I`m a

normal – just for a few minutes.




KRISTOL: You`re listening to hip-hop and God knows what. And I`m watching

Winston Churchill on YouTube.




MEACHAM: Ari – Ari…


MELBER: I think Jon – Jon has a response.


MEACHAM: Ari, I think what is important here, I think we need to do a dork





MEACHAM: So, if you have some masks, we will do it. We will do it with some

gloves and we will get into the Kristol household.


KRISTOL: It`s good that I`m here to amuse all of you.




MELBER: All I`m saying is, I think Meacham and I are both somewhat

historical nerds as well. I know he has a J.D. We read the founding



But I don`t know that Meacham is at 11:00 at night just hitting that

YouTube Churchill button.


Having dispensed with that business, again, before I bring in the doctor,

here was Larry Kudlow on the economic-health intersection.


Bill, take a look.




QUESTION: Larry, dreadful numbers this morning, no sugarcoating it. Is this

as bad as it gets?



it`s as bad as it gets. I don`t think this pandemic contraction has yet

fully run its course.


Regarding the next month or two, which you`re really going to transition

into a reopening of the economy, who is to say the numbers will not get





MELBER: To bill and then Dr. Azar, what is the responsible policy approach

if you should be respecting the medical situation?


KRISTOL: I would say – first to say this is going to be more than a month

or two of dealing with it.


And, again, if we don`t get serious about the public health side of it, the

distancing, but also, of course, the testing, the PPE, for lots of people,

not just health care workers – and they come first, obviously – but

others who are dealing with people, with customers and so forth, if you

don`t have a serious federal government response that adjusts to reality,

that does take account of differences around the country, but that really

does take account of them, and doesn`t just wish that one part of the

country isn`t going to be susceptible to a virus or something, I`m very

worried actually that the economic downturn could be very long-lasting.


I think people are underestimating how much – how difficult it`s going to

be to get out of this. And we can get out of it, but it`s going to take

serious leadership across the board.


MELBER: Doctor?





MELBER: On any, all of the above.




MELBER: Let me say, Doctor, I will just frame it as any of that.


I`m curious your views, particularly how should policy-makers should look

at those projections. And then, in addition, we`d love your views on what

the risk rate is with Pence`s aide.


AZAR: Yes. So, yes – so, the Pence`s aide thing first.


In a world that wasn`t the White House, you know, she would – all her

contacts would be traced and they would go into self-quarantine for 14

days. You know, I think it is a little bit of a different world that they

are living in, and they are going to be testing everybody daily.


Now, we already know that folks who she came into contact with over the

next couple of days could be tested, and they might be testing negative,

but their tests may turn positive after a couple of days. It takes a few

days for that molecular test to become positive.


So, again, it`s not – their world isn`t the real world that we`re living

in. They`re not going to be quarantining for 14 days. They will be testing

everybody. So that will be OK.


I think the issue or the question is was, were these cases all linked? Are

they all a cluster, from the president`s valet to Katie, or are they

separate? And if they are separate, then should it be no surprise to

anybody, given what we know about the easy transmissibility of this virus,

that it`s probably more widespread perhaps within the White House than we

currently know, and more folks may end up turning positive in the next

couple of days.


And, obviously, I wish both of those individuals well. We don`t want to

take for granted that they have tested positive for the virus.




AZAR: To the other point about the tension between the economic health and

the public health of this country, I make a few points.


There was another projection from the Institute for Health Metrics and

Evaluation from the University of Washington that now projects about

134,000 cases or deaths by August 1. And they do include some mitigation in

that number.


And Dr. Murray, who leads that group, says very basically, is there

anything that we can do to mitigate that, to offset that? And he says yes,

of course, with testing and contact tracing and cautious behavior.


To Bill`s point, that means when you`re out in public you do wear a mask to

protect other folks. You do stay six feet apart from people. And that is –

that`s the only way that we can combat the mobility, because we do need to

mobilize, right? We can`t realistically stay in our homes forever.




MELBER: Let me read to you, Doctor, on that point, Politico with this

headline, wearing a mask is for – quote – “smug liberals.”


Bill was referring to this idea earlier. “Refusing to is for reckless

Republicans,” and noting, inside the White House, the building is – quote

– “a relatively mask-free zone. At a meeting that included Mark Meadows

and 20 other White House officials and Secret Service agents, nobody from

the White House was wearing a mask or other face covering.”


Is that a bad idea, Doctor?


AZAR: Yes.


That just – that – I mean, look, it sounds completely reckless, when

you`re testing once a week and all the people who are working in the White

House are going home to their families. They are potentially taking public

transportation. They`re also going to the grocery store and the pharmacies

and things like that.


And as we have said from the beginning of this, that during the pandemic,

how important it is that the messaging from the top is consistent, is

clear, is science-based.


So, it`s just – it`s such a small sacrifice, isn`t it, really, to put a

piece of cloth over your face. I don`t get it. I don`t.




And I appreciate your clarity on it.


We have a lot in the show. So I`m going to fit in a break. I want to thank

Dr. Azar and Jon Meacham, including for the impromptu dork intervention. We

can all use that from time to time.




MELBER: And, Bill – we`re not done with Bill Kristol. That`s all I will

say about that. I`m going to see him later this hour.


Coming up, we do have some policy-makers, including Chairman Adam Schiff.

I`m very excited to hear his views on this outgrowth of the Mueller Russia

probe and the intervening in Michael Flynn`s case. I will ask him about

that directly after this break.


Also, the story we have been covering, arrests in that Georgia shooting

case, an investigation of a third person now under way.


Also, we have a special report tonight that I want to share with you about

what we can do and learn about which states are getting it right and also

some problems in New York that may have helped spread this virus further

around the nation.


And then, later, by the end of the hour, a very special Friday night

segment with Fat Joe and, yes, Bill Kristol, reunited, and it feels so



I`m Ari Melber. You`re watching a special edition of THE BEAT on MSNBC.






QUESTION: When history looks back on this decision, how do you think it

will be written?


WILLIAM BARR, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL NOMINEE: Well, history is written by

the winners. So, it largely depends on who`s writing the history.




MELBER: Does it?


That is the fairly brash out-in-the-open answer or defense, if you want to

call it that, from Attorney General Barr about this unusual push to have

charges dropped against Trump adviser Michael Flynn, who literally pled

guilty, before getting this brand-new, very controversial sweetheart deal

from the administration that he once served.


Now, on the heels of this move, Donald Trump called into FOX News and

issued a new threat.




TRUMP: These are dirty politicians and dirty cops and some horrible people.

And, hopefully, they`re going to pay a big price someday in the not-too-

distant future.




MELBER: It is a big story, and we have a big guest who has been in the

center of all of it, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee,

Chairman Adam Schiff.


He led the prosecution, of course, at the impeachment trial, and is the –

potentially one of the people in the crosshairs of this whole revenge



First of all, thanks for joining me, Chairman Adam Schiff.


REP. ADAM SCHIFF (D-CA): Thank you. It`s great to be with you.


MELBER: What is your response first to the legal development of the Justice

Department taking this unusual step, trying to cancel a guilty plea that

already existed?


SCHIFF: Well, the usual response to so many events within the Trump

administration, shock, being aghast, and yet not at all surprised, because

this is the history of this president and this attorney general, who views

his job as essentially carrying out the dirty work for the president.


Let`s remember what was at stake here. The president of the United States,

then Barack Obama, imposes sanctions on Russia for interfering in the U.S.

election. One of the chief surrogates of Donald Trump, who the Russians

have just helped get elected, has secret conversations with the Russians

designed to undermine those sanctions.


And then he lies about it, lies about it to the vice president. The vice

president goes out and misleads the country about it, and the FBI becomes

concerned that Flynn is compromised, because, of course, the Russians know

that he`s lied.


And those lies have now been amplified by the vice president`s statements.

That is a prime counterterrorism risk and the subject of a more-than-valid

counterintelligence investigation.


What Bill Barr has just said in dismissing this case is, no, we shouldn`t

look into those things. And what`s more, if you lie to the FBI about those

things, it`s perfectly fine.


But what he`s really saying is, if you are a friend of the president, then

justice doesn`t matter anymore in this country.


And, in that respect, I think we have rolled the clock back half-a-century

to the days of Watergate, and we have really invalidated so many of the

reforms we have put in place to protect the independence of the Justice



MELBER: If this rolls back one of the convictions, one of the legal

victories of the Mueller probe, and the president gets away with this and

continues, and Bill Barr says out in the open, well, might makes right, the

victors writes history, not something we are supposed to hear from a

nonpartisan Justice Department, what do you say to people who are concerned

that the president is basically getting away with it all?


SCHIFF: Well, first of all, I would say to Bill Barr, you can`t gaslight



I don`t think the fact that you tried to create this false narrative is

ultimately going to succeed. Over much of the obstruction of the

administration, we have uncovered a great deal of the president`s

misconduct vis-a-vis Russia and Ukraine, and we will uncover the misconduct

going forward.


So, I don`t think he is right about that, as brash as it is and ugly to

hear from an attorney general.


In terms of the president and his threats of vengeance and whatnot, none of

that, Ari, as you know, is new. And we`re going to have to defend the

institutions of this democracy until this threat no longer persists.


There is reason why this case is being dismissed under the cloak of a

pandemic, under the cloak of night. And it`s because they don`t want these

things to really see the light of day. So, I think it`s important that,

even during a pandemic, you`re pointing these things out.




MELBER: Let me get you on that.


You think this was deliberately done by Bill Barr`s Justice Department to

take advantage of the pandemic and sneak it in?


SCHIFF: Oh, I don`t think there is any question that so much of what

they`re doing right now is being done because they know the country, of

necessity, is focusing on life or death.


You know, the decision to fire Michael Atkinson, that`s something the

president wanted to do months ago, but he waited until now because we`re

contending with thousands of deaths every day.


Similarly, he could have had Barr dismiss the Flynn case at any time. So,

yes, I think that this is an effort to both distract the public attention.

I think it`s part of the broader effort that you were talking about last

night, I believe, Ari, to rewrite history, that is, make the whole Russia

investigation go away, create some alternate narrative that, through sheer

repetition, they can try to get people to believe.


But I have more confidence in history and the American people to see

through these deceptions.


MELBER: Well, I think it`s very important, what you say there.


And that brings us to something else I want to ask you about. We were

covering this last night, as you mentioned.


I have always pointed out in legal reporting that Bob Mueller was very

careful. He didn`t find or indict on a criminal conspiracy in the election.

He didn`t. He really followed every case as it went by the facts.


But this isn`t about redoing what he found lawfully. It is about taking

convictions that were already won and trying to reverse them. And I think

that distinction is very important.


The president made an admission that I want to play for you that is really

quite stunning.


And I want to warn viewers, what you`re about to hear is a sitting

president of the United States basically say that he views the Justice

Department the same way Nixon did in the manner that got him forced out of

office. It`s really something.


Again, the pandemic, you may be focused on other things, understandably.

But I want to play this for the congressman`s response, the president here

on FOX.




QUESTION: If Bill Barr was your first attorney general, would there have

been a Mueller probe and a Russia hoax? .


TRUMP: No, there wouldn`t be. He would have stopped it immediately.




MELBER: Chairman Schiff, is that an incriminating admission? And what, if

anything, does Congress do about it?


SCHIFF: Oh, absolutely.


What he is basically saying is, Bill Barr is doing all the dirty work that

the president could want. Any investigation would never go forward of

President Trump under Bill Barr.


There is all too much truth of that. Indeed, as you know, the plea deal

that Michael Flynn was offered was a very favorable plea deal.




SCHIFF: He was accused of other very serious conduct, doing illicit work

for the Turkish government, not registering as an agent of a foreign power

and other potential crimes.


So, many thought he got off very slightly, pleading to this one charge of

lying to the FBI.


Well, there is little or no chance that Bill Barr will allow the

investigation of those other serious crimes to go forward or really

probably anyone else who is a friend or lackey of the president`s.


Look at Bill Barr`s already interference on behalf of Roger Stone to try to

get him a lighter sentence. So, yes, the president installed Bill Barr for

a reason. The president was dissatisfied with Jeff Sessions for a reason.

He felt that Jeff Sessions should have been his Roy Cohn, and he wasn`t.

But he did get his Roy Cohn in Bill Barr.


And what that means is, when you have an unscrupulous president like this

one, an attorney general who is essentially acting as his defense lawyer,

as is Rudy Giuliani, it means the prospect for further corruption,

malfeasance is that much greater.


I do think that Bob Mueller, as you say, was very careful, and properly so,

but I would think, in some respects, too careful. I think that the policy

that he adhered to that you can`t indict a sitting president was a mistake,

and one that I hope, in retrospect, we come to recognize as a mistake, and

we change that policy, so that no one is above the law, not even a sitting



MELBER: All very interesting and important reaction here to something that

we`re going to stay on, because people need to know about it.


Chairman Schiff, thank you for your time tonight.


SCHIFF: Thanks, Ari.


MELBER: When we`re back in just 30 seconds, I`m going to dig into a policy

mystery about why some states have combated coronavirus better than others.


We`re back in 30.




MELBER: This week, most states in America are partially reopen in some



So the debate is continuing over how to manage this pandemic, and what are

the right trade-offs to make. Now, remember, under our Constitution, these

are mostly calls for governors to make. The president is a bystander,

whether he likes it or not.


And several governors took early actions to tackle the virus, some with

more medical and policy progress than others. So, let`s get into it right



Consider this fact. Two large states hit with the virus issued orders

keeping people at home around roughly the same time. California and New

York acted statewide a day apart. But, remember, there were huge parts of

California with a lot of people living in them that took local action



Six counties in Bay Area announcing stay-at-home orders all the way back on

March 16.




UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The shelter at home orders in effect for the counties of

Santa Clara, San Mateo, S.F., Marin, Contra Costa, Alameda, along with the

cities of Berkeley and Oakland, which means you`re supposed to stay at home

unless you work in an essential business.


UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Many are calling this a new normal. Well, it`s the new

normal temporarily in an effort to protect public health.


UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Alameda County joined the health officials of five

other Bay Area counties in issuing this unprecedented order today.




MELBER: Unprecedented, and it was a very good thing.


In fact, by the time that the California governor, Newsom, announced a

statewide shutdown, over 21 million people – that`s, of course, larger

populations than many entire states – and it`s half of California`s

population – were in those stay-at-home orders.


And while New York Governor Cuomo has made plenty of headlines with his

leadership in New York and his press conferences, the mounting data shows

that California`s action achieved better, swifter progress in combating the

spread of this virus.


You can see it right here, and it is chilling. Look at how the spread and

impact of this disease stayed so flat over time in California, in contrast

to surging in New York, which, among other things, acted later.


And it`s not just one state vs. another. We can see this contrast up in

Washington state. You may recall it`s one of the first places to get hit.

It was before New York, but facing less devastation right now, partly

because of early action by Governor Jay Inslee, putting science first.




GOV. JAY INSLEE (D-WA): We can succeed in this if we make our decisions

based on calm confidence that is based on science and rational thought and

the sense and understanding that we are all in this together.




MELBER: We`re in this together, and we can keep learning about this

together right now.


The first days of the infectious part of a pandemic are what matter most.

Washington state and Seattle leaders knew that. They moved fast to persuade

people to stay home, while New York moved more slowly and let politicians`

voices dominate, according to this “New Yorker” investigation.


And it faults Democrats de Blasio and Cuomo in New York. Now, this matters

for helping people, for learning in real time in order to save lives moving

forward. And we`re now seeing new specific evidence of how some areas were

able to control the spread better than others.


Now, how can you be sure? Well, technology can actually help. That same

report I mentioned cites cell phone data showing nearly a quarter of

Seattleites actually were avoiding their workplaces as early as March 6. In

New York City, it was another week that passed until an equivalent

percentage were doing sheltering in place.


Now, you might say, OK, Ari, what`s one week? We have all been surprised at

some point or another early on about this. We have all been adjusting.


But medical experts say that was crucial time loss, because this was back

in March. And as the West Coast basically swiftly closed up, Governor

Cuomo, remember, was still publicly saying something that did turn out to

be incorrect.


He was saying that – quote – “There`s not going to be any rules keeping

people in their houses.”




BILL DE BLASIO (D), MAYOR OF NEW YORK: I think New Yorkers should be

prepared right now for the possibility of a shelter-in-place order.


GOV. ANDREW CUOMO (D-NY): There is not going to be any you-must-stay-in-

your-house rule.




MELBER: March 17, time lost. And there was, of course, such a rule.


Now, when dealing with a pandemic, you have to have – and public health

experts emphasize this over and over – you have to have clarity about what

you`re doing, even if things are changing fast, and you have to act as soon

as possible.


The former CDC director says that, if New York had implemented those stay-

at-home orders just 10 days earlier, it might have reduce these COVID

deaths by 50 to 80 percent.


Then there is brand-new reporting from “The New York Times” that shows the

majority of the spread inside the United States can be traced back to New

York – quote – “The central role of New York`s outbreak shows decisions

made by state and federal officials helped shape the trajectory of the

outbreak and allowed it to grow in the rest of the country.”


This is very important. And, sometimes, there is a lot of attention paid to

things for reasons that aren`t rooted in science, what the president does,

or major media being located in New York, or someone giving a good press

conference, or at least good compared to what we were seeing out of the

White House.


The point here is not blame. The point is for learning as we go. And there

are many factors at play. Experts say that other factors, apart from what I

just showed you, like New York`s density and use of public transportation,

also play a role.


But we are learning, from the data I showed you, from who acted first, from

where people stayed home first, that early action is important and that

some of New York`s delays cost lives and had a national effect.


So, we need to keep that in mind. It has nothing to do with whether you

like this or that politician. It has everything to do with what we need to

do right now, which is speak openly, honestly and bluntly about what we`re

learning to act quickly and decisively, particularly as nobody knows

whether we might face a recurrence, a second wave of all of we

wanted to show you those facts. And coming up after a quick break, I will

be joined by Congress nobody knows whether we might face a recurrence, a

second wave of all of this.


So, we wanted to show you those facts.


And coming up after a quick break, I will be joined by Congressman Hakeem

Jeffries, a member of Democratic leadership. We have a lot to get to.






MARCUS ARBERY, FATHER OF AHMAUD ARBERY: His heart was just bigger than



Let me tell you, he just loved people. He just was a good young man. And he

just was outgoing with everybody. So, he just loved the people. He just –

he just didn`t deserve to go out like that.




MELBER: The father of Ahmaud Arbery speaking out, the young man who was

killed, shot to death while jogging, unarmed, broad daylight, a story we

have been covering. Two arrests in that case now.


And I want to bring in Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, who knows these issues

well, as he serves on the House Judiciary Committee and is a member of

Democratic membership.


Good evening, sir.


REP. HAKEEM JEFFRIES (D-NY): Good evening, Ari. Good to be with you.


MELBER: We cover the pandemic a lot. And I have some questions I want to

get to with you on that.


But this is a topic you and I have discussed before. You have worked in

your career on it. Yet again, we`re faced with this situation, and not only

the shooting of this young unarmed black man, but that it occurred in

February. This arrest broke late in the day yesterday.


Your response to all of it for viewers, and what do you think can be done

to prevent a next one?


JEFFRIES: Well, we are dealing with a troubling pandemic related to a

public health crisis and an economic crisis. There is a lot of pain. There

is a lot of death. There is a lot of suffering.


We know that the African-American community has been disproportionately and

adversely impacted by this pandemic. And even in the midst of all of this,

we`re still dealing with underlying issues of racial and social injustice.


And so it`s a tragedy. And it highlights that, though we have come a long

way in America, we still have a long way to go to get to a place where

equal protection under the law truly means equal protection under the law.


MELBER: Would these men, in your view, have been arrested if not for the

public outcry?


Because, as I mentioned, this case has been kicking around for a long time.

And in our reporting earlier this week, we were hearing things from the DA

that I reported, and then I explained to viewers why they weren`t on the

level, saying, for example, oh, we would have to wait for a grand jury to

charge, and the grand juries are out because of COVID.


And I explained, you don`t need legally the grand jury to indict. And, sure

enough, during COVID, they did, under pressure, go ahead and indict without

the grand jury.


JEFFRIES: Absent public pressure, it`s clear to me that it`s very unlikely

that these two individuals would have been arrested.


There appears to be a close relationship between the local law enforcement

operator, whether that`s the district attorneys or the investigators, based

on the history of at least a father having spent his career in law





JEFFRIES: And we have seen this throughout the country when this intimate

relationship often leads to the absence of an investigation or the absence

of accountability.


This is one of the reasons why, in Washington, we have been fighting for

independent investigators, independent prosecutors in order to address the

situations where clearly at the local level you`re not going get blind



MELBER: Right.


And that`s something we have covered a lot. As you mentioned, it`s a real

problem when either there is too much of a conflict of interest between

active police and DAs, when there may be a crime that could, a potential

crime that could involve police, or in this case ex-police, but, as you say

– and other experts have told us that this week – that was a concern.


We were just looking at some of the footage for viewers of those arrestees.


Congressman Jeffries, this was an important story I wanted to return to.


I thank you for joining us tonight.


JEFFRIES: Thank you, Ari.


MELBER: Appreciate it.


Coming up after the break, we take a turn. It`s been a long week, for sure,

and we have some very special guests on some of the biggest challenges of

the coronavirus era.


We`re also going to get into pressure on Trump Attorney General Bill Barr

for a story we won`t let go, the question whether they`re rewriting the

history of the Mueller probe, and maybe some other fun stuff before we

finish the hour.


Stay with us.




MELBER: When times get this tough, do we need more culture, more fun, more

breaks, or less?


We do the news here, so we do a lot of serious stuff. But on THE BEAT, we

happen to believe that more culture and looking at the wider culture and

music and art and how it brings us all together is worthwhile.


One of our favorite examples is the conversations that basically came about

organically and flowed between Grammy-nominated artist Fat Joe and longtime

conservative Bill Kristol, who has worked in the Reagan and Bush



They debuted with us on the year we debuted, in 2017. And for whatever

reason, we got a lot of feedback about it and some buzzing about it. We

reconnected in 2018.


In fact, they even drove around Manhattan together, taking the city by

storm. You can see the happier days there, no social distancing, just a

couple of people riding around in an SUV.


We know that those of you who happen to watch THE BEAT have told us you

love them, which is why we want to say we love them too.


And, right now, we get into a very special “Fallback Friday.”


Guess who is bz-ack? Fat Joe and Bill Kristol reunited.


How you guys doing?


JOSEPH CARTAGENA, FAT JOE: What`s up, Bill? What`s up, Ari?


MELBER: What`s up, Bill?


KRISTOL: How are you doing, Fat Joe?


CARTAGENA: Bill, what is up, man?


MELBER: How are you doing, Fat Joe?




KRISTOL: I`m doing fine. I was asking how you were doing. We`re – you

hanging in there?


CARTAGENA: I`m all right. I`m hanging in there. I`m hanging in there, man.


A lot of times, I have been working since for 25 years straight without

taking a break enough. And so I have been able to connect with the family

and spend time with the family and bond with my daughter and my wife and



So, it`s actually been a pleasant experience for me as far as quarantining

in the house.


MELBER: I love that.


Let me say, number one, I feel like this is the Zoom call America needs,

right down to the one- or two-second delay.


But, two, I`m curious, for both of you, what personally or publicly do you

think has positively come out of this tough time, first Bill and then Fat



KRISTOL: Well, I have also enjoyed spending more time at home with my wife.

I`m not sure she is enjoying it quite as much as I am.


But I`m sure Fat Joe`s family is loving having him there, and that`s a good



I think what`s come out of it, on the good side, more broadly, we –

earlier in the show, Ari, we were talking about how childish some people

are being, including the president of the United States.


A lot of Americans are behaving awfully well, awfully responsibly. A lot of

real heroism from health care workers, but from a lot of other people,

people who are working, helping bring food and everything.


I mean, look, we`re having this terrible crisis, health crisis and economic

crisis, but an awful lot of people are making things work, and it could be

a lot worse.


So, I have been impressed by the resilience and courage, really, in a good

sense, of a heck of a lot of Americans.




CARTAGENA: Me, I just feel like this is a time – I feel like this is a

test or a lesson in time from God.


And I think maybe we have been getting carried away. And he said, pump your

brakes, stay home, I`m in charge.


And you learn that we got caught with a lot of different things, material

things, or luxuries, different things. And you realize that – you realize

who is really important to you, and what`s really important in your life.

And you realize how vulnerable we really are as human beings.


MELBER: Truth. That`s for sure.


You know, I love you two together. And now I`m hearing there`s one more

person who wants to join.


So, we`re actually going to crash this “Fallback” with a surprise addition.


Are you ready?


CARTAGENA: I`m ready.


MELBER: Congressman Hakeem Jeffries, what`s up?


You wanted to get in here?




JEFFRIES: Well, you know, Fat Joe and Bill Kristol together, now you know

you in trouble. So, I wanted to get a part of the action.






MELBER: Now, what about the Brooklyn-Bronx – is there a Brooklyn-Bronx

rivalry here?


Or are you guys all good, Congressman?


JEFFRIES: No, we`re certainly all good.


We appreciate what Fat Joe and the Boogie Down Bronx, of course, have meant

to the culture and what Joe has meant to hip-hop music, both in New York,

but across the country and throughout the globe.


And, of course, Bill Kristol has done a great job speaking truth to power

over these last few years, while our democracy`s been under a tremendous



So, we appreciate this combination, and, of course, appreciate you, Ari.


MELBER: That`s nice of you to say.


Fat Joe, the congressman`s right that – not to put Bill Kristol on the

spot, but he is – you know, when they talk about Trump resistance, he is

that rare thing. He is a resistance Republican in 2020, or ex-Republican,

whatever you want to call it.


CARTAGENA: A few years back, he made the curb. He hit the curb, and he came

back to realization.




CARTAGENA: And we`re happy for that.


And, you know, the man`s been around politics all his life, Bill Kristol.

And he know what he seen this – the way this was going. And I believe, in

20 years from now, 30 years from now, the president will go down as the

president who`s crashed the greatest economy and overseen 150 to, God

forbid, 200,000 American lives lost.


That`s just how they going to view it when it`s said and done 20, 30 years

from now.


I guess Bill Kristol knew this guy wasn`t ready for this.




KRISTOL: Yes, I think I was right that he shouldn`t have been – become the

Republican nominee and shouldn`t have become president.


And a lot of other people were right about that, too. And he won one



I do think now it`s a serious thing. Congressman Jeffries is doing a great

job. I think the Congress really needs to do its best to make things less

bad than they would otherwise be. You can`t – you know, there is only one

president, so there are limits to what Speaker Pelosi and Congressman

Jeffries and others can do, but making sure the election comes off in

November, in a safe and secure way, that there is money for that, making

sure that the economy, we keep it going as well as possible.


Getting out the public health message, I think that`s something that

Congress can do more a little more, maybe the Biden campaign, even,

because, right now, we`re getting so little healthy guidance from where we

are used to getting it, which is the White House.


MELBER: Congressman?


JEFFRIES: Yes, this is an extraordinary moment.


And it requires an extraordinary intervention at the congressional level.

We`re going to continue to do what`s necessary to put everyday Americans

first, to put essential workers and displaced workers, and low-wage

workers, and the poor, the sick, the afflicted, the least, the lost, and

the left behind first.


We would appreciate a different level of presidential leadership, but we`re

left with what we`re left with. And so we`re going to try to continue to

work in a bipartisan way with our colleagues in the Senate, arrive at

common ground, do the right thing for the American people, and then, in

November, make sure we can have a safe and secure election, so we can get

past this long national nightmare.


MELBER: Now, I appreciate all that, the seriousness of that.


And yet, because this is “Fallback Friday,” Fat Joe, you heard him. He said

do the right thing. That`s a Brooklyn reference. He`s going back to Spike

Lee in Brooklyn. He`s doing that to you while you`re here.


I`m just trying to say, is he pushing back on the Bronx here?


CARTAGENA: If it wasn`t for the Bronx, this rap thing never would be going



So, tell me where you from. Uptown, baby. Uptown, baby.




MELBER: We gets down, baby.


I love it. I love you guys coming together.






MELBER: We gets down, baby.


I love it. And all of you are a good sport, each and every one of you, to

doing what we trying to do here, which is collaborate, come together,

learn, learn from each other.


So, in that spirit, I love seeing you to end the week.


Fat Joe, Bill Kristol, Congressman Jeffries, thank you.


JEFFRIES: Thank you, Ari.




We will be right back with one more thing.




MELBER: New data tonight about racial disparities that are continuing when

it comes to enforcing social distancing.


Look at this New York City data. Of course, that`s an epicenter. And it

shows that people of color are being disproportionately impacted. In fact,

over 51 percent of summons about this were to African-Americans for

allegations of violating social distancing rules – that`s from March to

the past week – 30 percent issued to Hispanic New Yorkers.


We wanted to show you that because it`s a reminder about some of the issues

we have been covering and how it affects different people, whether we have

fair enforcement. That`s a final thought from us.


Thank you, as always, for watching THE BEAT. I hope you enjoyed everything

tonight, including our great time with Congressman Jeffries, Fat Joe, and,

of course, Bill Kristol.


I`m Ari Melber. I will see you back here Monday at 6:00 p.m. Eastern.


Keep it right here on MSNBC.







Copyright 2020 ASC Services II Media, LLC.  All materials herein are

protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,

distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the

prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter

or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the