Kurt Volker, meets with lawmakers. TRANSCRIPT: 10/3/19, Hardball w/ Chris Matthews.

Jill Colvin, Terri Sewell, Joshua Geltzer, Michael Schimdt, Cory Booker, Katrina Mulligan

ARI MELBER, MSNBC HOST:  Now, that does it for this episode of THE BEAT

with Ari Melber.  But don`t go anywhere because up next, It`s “HARDBALL”

with Chris Matthews.




Good evening.  I`m Chris Matthews in Washington.


Flustered and defiant, President Trump is throwing caution to the wind

tonight giving Congress even more grounds to impeach him for extorting a

U.S. ally.


Answering the question he refused to address yesterday, Trump today gave a

detailed confession of the misconduct at the center of his call with

Ukrainian President Zelensky.  Trump said his goal in that conversation was

to get Ukraine to deliver dirt on Joe Biden.




REPORTER:  Mr. President, what exactly did you hope Zelensky would do about

the Bidens after your phone call?


DONALD TRUMP, U.S. PRESIDENT:  Well, I would think if they were honest

about it, they would start a major investigation into the Bidens.  It is a

simple answer.  They should investigate the Bidens.




MATTHEWS:  Simple and incriminating.  That`s what Trump wanted from Ukraine

as he withheld U.S. military support from President Zelensky conditioning

that support with these infamous words, I would like you to do us a favor



Under increasing scrutiny, Trump is brazenly admitting in public now to the

favor he asked in private.  Even worse, he`s now using his bully pulpit as

president to publicly solicit more foreign dirt on Joe Biden, this time

from China.




TRUMP:  By the way, likewise, China should start an investigation into the

Bidens.  Because what happened to China is just about as bad as what

happened with Ukraine.


REPORTER:  Have you asked President Xi to investigate Joe Biden?


TRUMP:  I haven`t, but certainly something we could start thinking about.




MATTHEWS:  Another bombshell exploded late today as the House Committee has

deposed their first witness in the unfolding impeachment inquiry itself. 

The Washington Post reports that the former special envoy to Ukraine,

Ambassador Kurt Volker, who resigned last week, testified today that he

warned Rudy Giuliani that Giuliani was receiving untrustworthy information

from Ukrainian political figures about Joe



Text messages Volker gave to Congress today also appear to show that even

Trump`s ambassador to Ukraine, Bill Taylor, believed U.S. military support

was being withheld from that country to benefit Trump politically.


According to those text messages obtained by ABC News, Ambassador Taylor

told American diplomats in early September, quote, I think it`s crazy to

withhold security assistance for help with a political campaign.


Well, Taylor was rebuked by U.S. Ambassador to the E.U., Gordon Sondland, a

major Trump financial contributor, who replied that Taylor was incorrect

and that Trump has been crystal clear and no quid pro quo of any kind.


Well, after that message, Sondland recommended that they stop putting their

conversations in writing.  How is that?  Let`s go quiet here.


I joined now by U.S. Congresswoman Terri Sewell of Alabama, a member of the

House Intelligence Committee.  Thank you, Congresswoman.  Heidi Przybyla is

an MSNBC Correspondent.  Joshua Geltzer is a former NSC Senior Director,

Jill Colvin, of course, White House Reporter with the Associated Press. 

Jill, you`re starting in this thing.


What is going on with the president of the United States basically saying,

oh, yes, okay, I did it?  I was trying to extort this guy for dirt on a

political rival and I used my power as president to do it?



then turning around and publicly stating on the south lawn of the White

House, hey, China, if you`re listening, we`d like your help here too, which

just reminded me so much of that moment in 2016 where the president called

out to Russia, hey, if you have Hillary`s emails, we`d all like to see



What you have here is a president who, according to sources, really does

not seem to think that he has done anything wrong here, believes that there

is nothing wrong with him using political power like this to help his

presidential campaign, and using the strategy of really just spilling it

out in the open here.


MATTHEWS:  What is that strategy?  Shoot the moon?


COLVIN:  It`s something that helped him during the Mueller hearing, where

if you just put it out there, it winds up, in his opinion, help him to make

it seem a little bit less nefarious.


MATTHEWS:  Congresswoman, I wonder whether admitting corruption somehow

eases the smell of corruption.


REP. TERRI SEWELL (D-AL):  Well, you know, this president has been the

master of deflection.  And I think that what he`s doing, by invoking China

to also interfere, is he`s normalizing a pattern of presidential abuse. 

And, frankly, it just goes to show why it`s really important that we have -

- we do this impeachment inquiry and we get to the bottom of all the facts. 

We have to follow the facts where they lead us.  And, frankly, this

president is doing a lot of the hard work right in plain view for us.


MATTHEWS:  Well, the envoy over there, Volker has pointed out directly this

president was engaged in trying to extort political dirt on a rival, Joe

Biden, with the power of the United States` military support for that



SEWELL:  We`re still interviewing Volker, as we speak, so I can`t confirm

or deny what he said.  But I can say that this president is doing all the

talking, by his own admission, asked the Ukraine to look into Joe Biden and

his son.  He, by his own admission, asked Russia to find those emails from

Hillary Clinton.  He, by his own admission, has now asked China to

interfere in our elections.


And, Chris, I have to tell you for me, a person who represents Alabama`s

seventh congressional district, the Civil Rights District, I cannot believe

that we have a president in the Oval Office who would literally try to mess

with our – interfere with our elections and actually go to the very heart

of the integrity of our elections.


MATTHEWS:  Tell me about the Civil Rights District.


SEWELL:  My district includes Birmingham, my hometown of Selma.


MATTHEWS:  Okay, the history, all the history.


SEWELL:  Montgomery, Alabama.  It also includes Tuscaloosa Roll Tide.  So

my district is very proud of the fact that people, ordinary Americans, have

the temerity, the audacity to make America live up to its ideals of justice

and equality for all.  And in order to do that, they fought, died, bled,

marched for the right to vote.


And I think that this president has – using his own power, presidential

power for political and personal gain is actually incredulous and frankly

something that is worthy of an inquiry.


MATTHEWS:  We`re getting into the reality of this thing, and maybe the

reality doesn`t matter.  I said this many times, the essence of corruption

in public life is taking public trust and trading it for private interest,

and that`s what we`ve got here.  This guy, the ambassador, Bill Taylor,

over there is saying, this was always going on over there.  We were holding

up another country for dirt on a political rival here at home.



those sorts of warnings from people who realize this is not the way our

government is supposed to work.  Diplomacy can be complicated, U.S. policy

can be complicated, people can criticize it, but what it can`t be is

abusing public office for private gain.  And when somebody knows how a

government is supposed to work sees it, they say it.


MATTHEWS:  I thought we all knew it.  I guess Trump comes from a different

world, a smellier culture world, I`ve got to tell you, because it`s got

nothing to do with the reason people work for the government.


This comes as The Washington Post reveals how a low Rudy Giuliani will go

to traffic in disinformation that benefits this president.  Giuliani has

recently consulted with Trump`s convicted campaign manager, Palm Manafort. 

Quote, in pursuit of information he thinks would somehow show Ukrainian

efforts to support Hillary Clinton.


Not only that, but Giuliani has claimed responsibility for a mysterious

package of documents, there is one, addressed in calligraphy marked from

the White House, there is White House up there in the left, to Secretary

Mike Pompeo, which was delivered to the State Department this March.  Those

documents contain unproven allegations of disinformation targeting Joe

Biden and the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine who Trump later removed.


Well, NBC News reports that according to Giuliani, quote, he personally

gave Pompeo the file of documents and was told that the State Department

would take up an investigation of those claims, an assurance that Pompeo

now denies making.


Well, The Wall Street Journal also reports that Trump removed the former

U.S. ambassador to Ukraine after, quote, complaints from allies outside the

administration, including from Giuliani, that she was obstructing efforts

to persuade Kiev to investigate Joe Biden.


Heidi, it`s not just the moat between here and Mexico his crocodiles,

alligators and snakes in. It`s in this letter, the stuff that Rudy sent to

Pompeo, all this garbage and disinformation.  And this president – that

his lawyer.



whistleblower to come forward at this point with everything that is coming

out.  These are the documents that were obtained last night by our

colleague, Leigh Ann Caldwell.


And what they show was an orchestrated campaign, Chris, that goes all the

way back to January by Giuliani and others in the administration to

basically fabricate a story around the Bidens and press the former

prosecutor general of Ukraine into actually going on the Hill T.V. and

making false allegations.


You have the top anti-corruption expert in Ukraine, who I interviewed this

week, who said that there is no basis to these allegations.  And so all of

these documents are now going to back up this case against Rudy Giuliani,

against the president.


And you have in them as well documents from State Department employees

raising alarm about this and saying this is disinformation, what do we do? 

How do we push back on this?  What have they done in Moscow and the embassy

in Moscow to push back on disinformation if they didn`t know initially that

it was coming from Rudy Giuliani, but they believed that it was a well-

financed operation that was underway for months.


MATTHEWS:  You can`t believe, Congresswoman.  Here you have an envelope, a

manila envelope, classic, but it has the White House on the upper left

side, and it`s written in calligraphy.  Only a few people know calligraphy. 

It was everything but scented, this envelope.  And it doesn`t look like a

government document.  It`s something sort of over that transom (ph) kind of

piece of chunk you get, (INAUDIBLE), Congresswoman, we`ll get this, the

dirt being passed around.


But in this case, not by some furtive nobody, the president`s lawyer, Rudy

Giuliani, America`s mayor is out shipping this, dumping this stuff on the

secretary of state.


SEWELL:  You know, Rudy Giuliani doesn`t have any official title in this

administration.  He is the president`s lawyer.  But what becomes

increasingly more apparent, and that`s what this investigation and this

inquiry about, getting to the bottom of it.  But what seems to be

extensively happening is that he`s having foreign governments do his own

op-ed, his own opposition research into his political opponents.  And not

only is that illegal, it is an extreme abuse of power.


MATTHEWS:  Josh, that`s the question I get to, and I think it`s going to

turn this thing.  It`s not about ethics and some sort of clash you take in

government.  It`s about protecting the country.  We have a military

alliance with a country that`s vulnerable to the Russian.  I grew up –

everybody here, I guess we all grew up in the `40s, `50s and `60s worrying

about Russia and worrying about those captive nations on the border that

were under the Warsaw pact, controlled by Russia.


And now, we get this situation and a major breaking story just now from The

New York Times.  We`re learning that two of President Trump`s top envoys to

Ukraine drafted a statement for the country`s new president in August that

would have committed Ukraine to pursuing investigations sought by Mr. Trump

into his two political rivals.  That`s according to three people briefed on

the effort.


Michael Schmidt from The New York Times joins me right now.


Michael, explain how this fits into this whole saga?



call that we all know about now where the issue of these investigations

comes up.  A month later, in August, the president`s top diplomats to

Ukraine are drafting a statement that the president of Ukraine can put out

that says that he will commit to investigating these matters.  So it shows

the next step that came after the call.


Now, these diplomats were trying to assuage Trump and Giuliani.  They knew

how obsessed they were with Ukraine and knew how much it was bogging down

the United States` relationship with the country, and that they needed to

sort of pacify them in order to get the rest of the relationship to and fro

(ph).  And if the Ukrainians put this statement out, they would be

committing to the investigation, and they wouldn`t just be privately on the

phone with Trump saying they would it, they would actually move forward

with it.


MATTHEWS:  Was this done with more reservation by those two gentlemen when

they put out, perfused (ph) more reservation, in other words, they were

giving them a document to put out?  Were they hoping that the government

over there, Zelensky`s government, would actually do it or just say so?


SCHMIDT:  Well, I think that they thought this was the key to getting

Giuliani to stop, as we say in the story, poisoning Trump`s mind about

Ukraine.  They thought that it may get Giuliani to sort of layoff and give

the diplomats some room to do the work and move the relationship forward,

perhaps bring the Ukrainians over to Washington for an Oval Office meeting

to help them.


Now, obviously, the background of all this is the question of the aid and

what was going on with the aid.  We do not say in the story that they were

doing this to unlock the aid.  We don`t have evidence of that.  They were

more trying to just get the president and Giuliani to layoff and allow them

to do their regular diplomatic work.


MATTHEWS:  Thank you, Michael Schmidt from The New York Times, on that

breaking news story tonight.


Josh, here is the question.  Even with a formal letter coming out from a

couple of recommended, drafted by a couple of U.S. diplomats in the

interest of pacifying the president, I can see the president saying, I`ve

got a paper here that says that the Ukrainians are investigating Joe Biden. 

My point is made that they`ve had a lot less with that with Benghazi and

the emails, they can now say, a foreign government joins me in saying

there`s some dirt there.


GELTZER:  That`s right.  You know, we talked about 2016 and the campaign

then being infected by foreign disinformation.  But in 2020, this is

domestic disinformation.  That`s what Rudy delivered.


MATTHEWS:  Put in the mouths of foreigners.


GELTZER:  That`s right.  And to have that national security vulnerability

created by our own White House, I think that`s opening people`s eyes to

this abuse of power.


MATTHEWS:  Congresswoman, I think what happened the week or so ago when the

speaker, Nancy Pelosi, had been resisting this call for impeachment on

other grounds saw something here that was distinctly different, which was

not about misbehavior or even misconduct or even, generally, corruption. 

It was corrupting U.S. interests in the interest of a pal (ph) who happens

to be in the White House.


SEWELL:  You know, this is a sobering moment in American history.  And as

the speaker said so eloquently, sometimes history finds us.  And we have to

decide whether we`re going to uphold the constitutional oath of our duty or

are we going to allow this president to continue to abuse his

constitutional duty?


MATTHEWS:  And, apparently, also the vice president, because, meanwhile,

officials close to Vice President Pence say – well, they say he was,

quote, unaware of Trump`s efforts to pressure Ukrainian President Zelensky

for damaging information about Biden in early September when Pence

delivered the message to Zelensky that U.S. military aid would remain

frozen.  How`s that for a message?


That`s according to a reporting by The Washington Post, which alludes to

the apparent rift now developing between Pence and the White House

officials who were suggesting that Pence would have known.  They`re not

letting him off the hook.  They`re untangling him.


At the time of Pence`s meeting, by the way, with Zelensky in September, it

was a month ago, Rudy Giuliani`s effort to get Ukrainian dirt on Joe Biden

was already so well-known that Pence was asked about it just a day after

his meeting with Zelensky.


And here is that question from you, Jill.  You were onto it.  Let`s Assume

they were onto it.  Here it goes.




COLVIN:  Did you discuss Joe Biden at all during that meeting yesterday

with the Ukrainian president, and number two, can you assure Ukrainian that

the hold up of that money has nothing to do with efforts, including by Rudy

Giuliani, to try to dig up dirt on the Biden Family?


MIKE PENCE, U.S. VICE PRESIDENT:  Well, on the first question, the answer

is no.  But with President Zelensky yesterday, we discussed – we discussed

America`s support for Ukraine and the upcoming decision the president will

make on the latest tranche of financial support in great detail.




MATTHEWS:  Jill, he didn`t answer you?  He didn`t answer about the

connection between that latest tranche and where they`re playing ball and

digging up dirt on Biden.


COLVIN:  Yes.  I mean, the context that we know weeks later is the fact

that there have been all these conversations between the president and

Zelensky about what their definition of corruption was, and that mere

mention of that word and any type of conversation would automatically have

referred to this dirt that they were looking for.


I think we just need to take a step back.  This is such an interesting

moment for Mike Pence too, who up until this point has been pretty

successful at somehow being very loyal to the president but not really kind

of getting wrapped up in all of the controversies surrounding it.


MATTHEWS:  It reminds me of a lobster tank when the lobster tries to climb

out of the tank and the other lobsters pull that person – that lobster

back in.  These White House aides are not letting this guy out.


PRZYBYLA:  There are a lot of lobsters in the tank.


MATTHEWS:  Is that your final word?


PRZYBYLA:  That`s my final word, yes, there`s much more to come out.  The

whistleblower, you know, the I.G. is going to be giving his report now

behind closed doors, testifying on Friday.  He`s going to –


MATTHEWS:  It`s a he?


PRZYBYLA:  Yes, going to fill in a lot of the blanks from that

whistleblower complaint and there will be other White House officials who

were in on that call, including Pence and his national security adviser.


MATTHEWS:  The news gods keep bringing news and this is a scary time for

our republic.  And I`ve got to tell you, anybody that`s happy about this is

crazy because the president was flawed before this.  Now, he`s really done

it to himself.  I think he`s impeaching himself.  Anyway, he did it again



U.S. Congresswoman Terri Sewell, thank you.  Is it Sewell?


SEWELL:  Sewell, like jewel.


MATTHEWS:  Sewell.  Thank you, Sewell.  Heidi Przybyla, thank you, Joshua

Geltzer, and thank you, Jill Colvin, great reporting, great scoop on the



Coming up, the White House is just hours away from a deadline to turn other

documents to Congress or face subpoenas.  What are the next steps if the

Trump administration continues to stonewall, and how do we get to an

impeachment vote before Thanksgiving?  That`s my deadline.


Presidential Candidate Cory Booker joins me next.


And what is the White House hiding about the Ukraine call like the – how

about this, the word-for-word transcript?  Where is that baby?




TRUMP:  I knew many people were on the phone.  Not only were many people on

the phone, we had stenographers on the phone taking it down word-for-word.




MATTHEWS:  And where is that word-for-word document?  The president says

every word was written down, but there were telltale signs that the memo

the White House released of that call does not contain the full extent. 

It`s only ten minutes long, 20 minutes missing.  Where is Rose Ray Woods

(ph)?  She did 18 minutes.  Where is the rest of it?


We`ve got much more to get to.  Stick with us.




MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL. 


In the eye of the storm and under siege, President Trump today publicly

called on two foreign countries to help him get dirt on a political

adversary.  It was a stunning public admission, confession, really, after a

week of being accused of doing the very same thing in a private call with

the Ukrainian president. 


For more, I`m joined by presidential candidate U.S. Senator Cory Booker of

New Jersey. 


Thank you, Senator, for this.


You`re frowning.  And I see why. 


But tell me, what do you make of this news breaking tonight from a number

of sources, diplomatic, civil servants, foreign office – Foreign Service

officers, that this president was determined to cut a deal whereby he sold

U.S. goodwill, military support, whatever, the whole shebang, to get dirt

on a potential rival for reelection? 



going to continue to find more and more disturbing things as this

investigation goes on. 


But these facts, as I see them right now, are absolutely unacceptable. 

Remember, Ukraine is under attack, a hot war, the invasion by the Russians. 

We share that common adversary.  They`re attacking the United States. 


And we were holding up aid that both parties in Congress agreed to deliver

because this president was trying to pursue his own petty personal

political agenda?  That is absolutely outrageous, absolutely unacceptable,

violating his oath of office. 


And, again, this is just the beginning of this investigation. 


MATTHEWS:  When do you think of his allies in this?  And the more I cover

it, and the more you see it, as a political leader, it seems like he`s not

in this alone.  He`s got people in cahoots with him. 


He`s got Rudy Giuliani, who was once looked up to in this country in a

great way, as America`s mayor.  Now he`s working for him.  It looks like

Pompeo, the secretary of state, is in it with him.


It looks like certainly Attorney General Barr is with him on this.  And it

just seems like it`s a new political party.  There`s not a Republican

Party.  It`s a Trump party.  And they`re up to no good. 


BOOKER:  Well, clearly, there`s a lot of implications, shadow of

implication extending over other administrative people, other Cabinet

secretaries.  And this investigation must continue.


But just understand this.  We have his private attorney seemingly dictating

not only foreign policy, but whether even an ambassador stays in their



This is absolutely outrageous and unacceptable behavior that is a violation

of the values of not for both parties, Republicans and Democrats, but these

are just basically American values that are being undermined here by a

president who seems to think that office is his and not – doesn`t belong

to the people of the United States of America. 


MATTHEWS:  Well, back in 2016, a bipartisan group of your Senate colleagues

sent a letter to the then Ukrainian president urging him to press ahead

with urgent reforms to the prosecutor general`s office and judiciary. 


The letter was co-signed by Ohio Senator Rob Portman, Former Illinois

Senator Mark Kirk, and Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson.


In other words, Senate Republicans, including Mr. Johnson, joined the vice

president in calling for the Ukrainian prosecutor to be pushed out. 


And earlier this month, Senator Johnson, apparently forgetting he signed

that letter, urged Attorney General Bill Barr to look into the Bidens`

contacts with Ukraine for corruption. 


This seems to be a problem mentally.  I know you`re a Rhodes Scholar.  I

don`t want you to be condescending to these people, but they don`t seem to

be able to remember anything. 


The other day, Kevin McCarthy didn`t know that the president conditioned

the military aid by saying, “I want a favor from you, though.”  He thought

the reporter cooked up the word. 


They`re not – how can these people on the other side of the aisle get so

distracted from this horrible situation the president has taken us into? 

Your colleagues, they`re out to lunch. 


BOOKER:  This – look, this is time where it`s unacceptable.  We cannot be

blinded by partisanship. 


There is enough here for everybody in Congress to be agreeing that we

should be doing a thorough investigation.


MATTHEWS:  Right. 


BOOKER:  And both parties, none of us should take glee in this.  This is a

sad, very sobering moment where we should look with an objective eye on

where the facts take us. 


And so partisanship, you`re surrendering your deeper patriotism in this

country if you`re just falling into your partisan stance.  This calls for -

- right now for us to be statespeople in the United States Senate and

demand that we follow the evidence and get to the facts of this, because,

if it goes where it seems to be leading, this president has betrayed his

office and the American people. 


MATTHEWS:  Let`s talk about the American people and your concerns about

young Americans, especially kids, really young kids, who are in poverty, in

tough situations. 


What can you do?  You`re talking about a new proposal. 


BOOKER:  Yes. 


I`m frustrated.  This is one of the reasons I`m happy to be running for

president, to bring issues up.  We have 170 policy plans between all of us

candidates, but we`re not talking about child poverty. 


So I put forward a very comprehensive plan that, according to Columbia

University, which doesn`t even take the totality of my actions, would cut

child poverty by about two-thirds. 


We, as a country, don`t understand poverty has its costs.  Children living

in poverty cost our economy about a trillion dollars a year.  In a global

knowledge-based economy, the most valuable natural resource we have it the

genius of our children, and we`re squandering it by regulating a

disproportionate amount of our population into poverty than our peer



So, we can do something about this.  There are evidence-based plans we can

do to reduce poverty.  And I have a very aggressive plan to do it, and that

will ultimately empower millions of children to be successful, to add to

our economy, as opposed to the costs we`re seeing right now by being a

nation that doesn`t have that courageous empathy to really address these



MATTHEWS:  Senator Cory Booker, thank you so much for coming on HARDBALL



Good luck out on the campaign trail.  You got another debate coming up. 


Up next:  Donald Trump says, we had stenographers on the phone taking it

down word for word. 


So, where is that word-for-word transcript of that damning call with the

Ukrainian president?  I want to see it word for word.  He says he`s got it. 

Where is it?


You`re watching HARDBALL. 






FRED THOMPSON, MINORITY COUNSEL:  Mr. Butterfield, are you aware of the

installation of any listening devices in the Oval Office of the president? 



I was aware of listening devices, yes, sir. 




MATTHEWS:  Well, there it is. 


Welcome back to HARDBALL. 


That was the voice of Fred Thompson, later a U.S. senator, but then

Republican counsel to the Senate Watergate Committee, questioning Nixon

aide Alexander Butterfield about the existence of a taping system in the

White House.


Well, Butterfield`s admission led to Nixon`s downfall. 


Yesterday President Trump claimed that the White House possesses a word-

for-word exact transcript of the July 25 phone call conversation that`s at

the center of the impeachment inquiry right now. 





the phone.  We had stenographers on the phone taking it down word for word. 


They didn`t know that I had a transcript done by very, very talented

people, word for word, comma for comma, done by people who do that for a

living.  We had an exact transcript. 




MATTHEWS:  So where`s the exact transcript right now? 


It`s certainly not the one the White House released of that conversation. 


On the first page of that memo that was released, it said – there`s a

disclaimer right there saying, “Not a verbatim transcript.”  That`s what it

says on the document.  It was put by White House people, by Trump. 


For more, I`m joined by Katrina Mulligan, managing director for national

security at the Center for American Progress.  She has also held positions

at the DOJ, NSC, and DNI, the national intelligence. 


Trump is very clear about this, verbatim, word for word, done by

stenographers.  And yet what came out was done by a lot of the national

security advisers and smart people, but no one could claim that a 10-minute

memo, which covers 10 minutes, is a 30-minute conversation.


What`s going on? 



memorandum of conversation, which is what we call this type of call

summary, it`s a summary.  It`s not intended to be a verbatim transcript. 


I was also struck by the president`s remarks about the verbatim transcript

and the stenographers.  It`s possible that he has no idea how these call

memos are produced.  I mean, that`s one possibility. 


The other possibility is that they have deviated from past practice.  They

certainly have in other areas, and that, you know, there may be such a

transcript that exists.  But, if there is one, it certainly isn`t this. 


MATTHEWS:  Let`s talk about this, because we have also got, as part of this

story, the fact that this White House, this president squirrels away

conversations that they think around him, people around him, think are

going to get him into trouble. 


They put onto some distant sort of form, under some kind of secrecy.  I

don`t know if they`re reachable or not, I don`t know, some server.  They

have got it totally sequestered away. 


And my question, is that where the real actual document is?  Because what

he put out is not a word-for-word verbatim. 


MULLIGAN:  So, I think there are a lot of questions swirling about this

secret server concept. 


And what I think is important for people to understand is that, when I was

at the National Security Council staff, everyone that was handling

classified information had access to secret and top-secret systems at their



And that`s where almost everything you need in order to do your job is

held.  This separate server that people are talking about is one that is

kept in the intelligence directorate.  It`s really only for the handling of

really intelligence sources and methods information. 


And it`s not typically a place where you would store, you know, something

of a lower classification or something that it`s – the only reason to put

something in that server is because you are trying to keep it from other

people that work at the White House. 


MATTHEWS:  That`s what I was thinking they were doing.


And the way I got the reporting was, they have a set place where they put

stuff that could embarrass this president because he said something in

telephone conversations or in the Oval Office that were going to get hi

into trouble. 


Anyway, “The Washington Post” points out that the use of certain markings

on the White House memo, such as ellipses, has fueled questions among

current and former U.S. officials about the completeness of the released



And two of those ellipses were used when President Trump was discussing a

conspiracy theory of his surrounding the idea that Ukraine was in

possession of the DNC server that was hacked during the 2016 election. 


A third ellipsis was used when Trump pressed the Ukrainian president to

investigate former Vice President Joe Biden.


Here`s how it shows up – quote – “Biden went around bragging that he

stopped the prosecution.  So if you can look into it” – dot, dot dot –

“it sounds horrible to me.”


Ellipses mean, I took something out, for whatever reason, to shorten



And, again, I go back to this, a 10-minute – Angus King, the independent

senator from Maine, recited the entire memo, and it came out to about 10



It`s a 30-minute conversation.  So, where`s the other 20 minutes? 


MULLIGAN:  I think there`s no question that the memo that is in the public

domain is incomplete.  There`s no question about that. 


I think, because this president is as untrustworthy as he is, because he`s

already shown himself and the people around him have shown themselves to be

willing to hide information, I think we have to get to the bottom of the

questions like the one you`re asking. 


But I think the bigger point that can`t lost get as we try to look for what

else may be uncovered is that what`s already in the public domain is more

than enough. 


MATTHEWS:  Oh, sure.


But I want to talk about – I just want to say something about the

suspicions I have about this president. 


He calls people who alerted the whistle-blower to what was in that

conversation spies.  Don`t – you can`t deny that this is the way he looks

at it.  People who put out honest information, factual information about

what he`s doing, he calls them spies. 


He didn`t say they got it wrong.  In this case, he didn`t say fake media. 

He said, they put it out and they`re spies. 


So his attitude is, people have no right to know what he`s up to when he`s

embarrassed himself. 


Anyway, thank you, Katrina. 


I`m going to talk more about it at the end of the show.  I think we have

got to find this transcript, because then we will really get it all.


Up next: President Trump is – but we may not need it. 


President Trump has assembled a one-man war room, by the way, to address

the threat of impeachment. 


So far, his strategy appears to revolve around lots of angry tweeting,

making fun of people, calling them shifty Schiff and that sort of thing,

calling people traitors, calling a legitimate impeachment inquiry a coup.


You`re watching HARDBALL. 






President Trump`s now open admission that he wants Ukraine and now China to

dig up dirt on the Bidens is just the latest evidence the White House has

been struggling to respond to the ever growing Ukraine scandal and

impeachment inquiry, the president is not. 


“The New York Times” reports that for all of him – his all by myself

strategy, President Trump has long believed he himself the best

communicator in the White House. 


But as the presidential campaign picks up his pace and the prospect of his

impeachment becomes more real, he seems to be the only empowered

communicator, a one-man war room, he is, responding to the developments

almost hour by hour. 


What`s left is Mr. Trump acting alone and poised to live-tweet his own

impeachment, complete with all-caps obscenities, alarming accusations of

treason and warnings that impeachment is really a coup.  That`s how he`s

really behaving.


As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam

Schiff addressed reporters yesterday, that one man operation came into

stark relief.  President Trump live-tweeted his own response to it,

attacking Pelosi as trying to win an election through impeachment, calling

Schiff a low – this is the Roy Cohn part of this guy – a lowlife, and

saying Democrats are wasting everyone`s time and energy on B.S.  He

actually used the word in all caps. 


Not content to stop there, the president continued to rage in his public

appearances again yesterday. 




DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDNT OF THE UNITED STATES:  He should resign from office

in disgrace, and frankly, they should look at him for treason calling him

Shifty Schiff.  We don`t call him Shifty Schiff for nothing.  He`s a

shifty, dishonest guy. 


Here`s an expression, he couldn`t carry his blank strap.  I won`t say it,

because they`ll say it was so terrible to say.  But that guy couldn`t carry

his blank strap.


They`ve been trying to impeach me from the day I got elected.  I`ve been

going through this for three years. 


Nancy Pelosi hands out subpoenas – you know, she has to approve it.  She

hands out subpoenas like they`re cookies.  You want a subpoena – here you

go, take them. 




MATTHEWS:  Cookies, I get it.  Shifty, I get it. 


But the president`s one-man war room has his Republican allies in Congress

itching for a plan to respond if there is one.  That`s coming up. 


You`re watching HARDBALL.






UNIDENTIFIED MALE:  What do you make of this exchange?  President Zelensky

says, we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for

defense purposes, and President Trump replies, I would like you to do us a

favor, though? 


REP. KEVIN MCCARTHY (R-CA):  You just added another word. 


UNIDENTIFIED MALE:  No, it`s in the transcript. 


MCCARTHY:  He said, I`d like you to do a favor, though? 


UNIDENTIFIED MALE:  Yes, it`s in – it`s in the White House transcript. 




MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL.


That was House Republican leader Kevin McCarthy on a bad day, out of his

depth, defending President Trump`s call he never paid attention to.  Of

course, that call being with the Ukrainian president, because in fact, the

president did say, though. 


But “The New York Times” reports that Trump views himself as his own best

defender and is making many Republicans anxious.  The White House has no

organized response to impeachment, a little guidance for surrogates to

spread a consistent message, even if he had developed one, and in minimum

coordination between the president`s legal advisers and his political ones. 

Nobody is – including McCarthy didn`t know what to say there. 


One Republican operative spoke to “Politico” about the alarm among

lawmakers, quote, nobody wants to look like McCarthy did on “60 Minutes”, I

don`t blame him.  And right now, they`ll duck and cover until they`re on

firmer footing. 


For more, I`m joined by this – from political experts, Michael Steele,

former RNC chair.  Adrienne Elrod, former senior advisor to the Hillary

Clinton campaign. 


Adrienne, there`s a problem here. 





MATTHEWS:  It`s a failure to communicate because they don`t know what to

communicate.  The president admits he did it, so how do they defend him

against what he`s admitting as of today, I tried to get dirt on a political

opponent using my powers of the president of the United States. 


ELROD:  And this is exactly the problem, Chris.  Every time he is not

satisfied with the way the media is going, instead of relying on his staff

and aides to fix the problems, he just takes control of it and makes it

worse.  We saw this during the campaign.  We`re seeing it manifest itself



But putting together a war room is 101, right, where you have a surrogate

operation, where you have a rapid response operation.  President Clinton

had it during the impeachment crisis –


MATTHEWS:  What do you tell your George Stephanopoulos, you`re Paul

Begalas, and your James Carvilles, even if you`ve got the smartest people

in the world, you`ve got to give them some hint on what the foundation is

of their case? 


MICHAEL STEELE, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST:  Absolutely, you just laid out

right there.  That`s the 101, and that`s what you get – you get those

smart messengers in the room and they put – they game it out, Chris.  They

game it out. 


That`s a big problem for a lot of Republicans on the Hill, there`s no one

gaming this out.  And it`s also sitting back waiting for the president to

tweet or doing what he did today on the lawn and everybody with cameras and

microphones to get in front of them to react.  That`s not gaming out the



But here`s going to be the real test, when this reaches that pivotal point

and it becomes really serious.  In other words, full-blown impeachment

trial under way, what do you do?  How do you – who do you bring into the

room at that moment?  Because the president`s going to need legal advice,

political advice, legislative advice, and – but he is the only one who can

give it. 


MATTHEWS:  Well, the Republicans they`re not just dodging questions from

the media today.  Senator Joni Ernst of Iowa, who`s up for reelection next

year, that`s important, a reelection means a lot these days, faced a tough

question from a constituent back in Iowa. 




UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE:  Where is the line?  When are you guys going to say

enough and stand up and say you know what I`m not backing any of this? 


SEN. JONI ERNST (R-IA):  OK, so President Trump if – I can say yay, nay,

whatever, the president is going to say what the president is going to.  I

don`t care who it is, when it is, corruption is corruption and it should be



UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE:  But it`s OK for our president to extort other

countries to investigate –  


ERNST:  OK, we`re going to move onto another question.  But what I`ll say

is, we can`t determine that yet. 




MATTHEWS:  The great thing about our Constitution is that senators have to

represent the entire state. 


ELROD:  Yes, that`s right. 


MATTHEWS:  You don`t just put together a cabal of your favorites, well, you

write questions you want to answer.  Somebody walks and say guess what, I`m

a Democrat, I`ve got some questions. 


ELROD:  Yes, Chris, what we just witnessed there with Senator Ernst, it

illustrates why the Trump administration needs a war room on this. 


I mean, again, this is common knowledge 101, and I think part of the reason

why they`re having difficulty wrapping their heads around how to do this,

is a top Republican talent from the operative standpoint, they will not go

there and do this.  This is career suicide. 


It`s career suicide if you go into the administration for a lot of these

people, especially on the communications side.  It`s also career suicide if

you`re putting together the Trump war room defending something so overtly

against the Constitution, so overtly violates everything we stand for. 




MATTHEWS:  I remember Bill Clinton got caught red-handed, you know,

thanking that colonel there at ROTC down Arkansas for saving from the

draft.  Now, that could have been lethal. 


STEELE:  Right.


MATTHEWS:  But those guys get out – Carville, and the rest, Begala, they

came out and they said, he`s a young idealist who opposed the war in

Vietnam and he was right, and he was right.  And they turned it into not

that he was a saint, but they got him out of and he got – and that was the

toughest facing – it wasn`t the girlfriend or all that, that was the

toughest thing, that letter.  And they turned it around through clever



STEELE:  But that`s – but that`s the thing.  It is that thing that comes

to the table that we haven`t seen yet that they`re going to need someone in

the room to turn it around and you`re going to have the Jodi Ernst of the

world out there with microphones and constituents in front of them asking

questions that they can`t answer because no one has figured out how to turn

it around.


ELROD:  You know it isn`t helping a system.


MATTHEWS:  You know how to do this, right?  The president of the United

States in this case says, OK, held up a military ally, Ukraine, and I

wanted some dirt.  I said you can get your military assistance if you can

give me some of this dirt, though, I want a favor.  How do you defend that

if you`re really good at this business? 


ELROD:  I don`t think you can, Chris.  I really don`t think you can. 


And furthermore, I think if you try to go out there and defend this as a

Republican or especially in a swing district or a district that maybe you

can win this and the maps get redrawn and maybe that more difficult, I

think it`s going to be very hard to go out there.  Four, six years from

now, this is kind of opposition research that your opponents will use

against you, who defended Trump when he was doing the indefensible. 


MATTHEWS:  The way you do it in politics is you change the question.  Of

course, I`m guilty, but what side are you on?  It`s called the great fog

machine.  They did it when Trump – rather, Ronald Reagan lost that first

debate to Mondale.  The issue is not whether he had a lousy debate, sure,

he had a lousy debate.  What side are you on?


So you go down to the districts that Trump won, those 31 Democratic

congressional people, who represent now thanks to 2018 Trump people. 


ELROD:  Yes.


MATTHEWS:  So you go to those people and you say, are you with Trump or are

you with the other side?  The lefties, the liberals, are you with them? 

That`s the game I play for Trump.  I don`t want to give him ideas, but

that`s what I do.


STEELE:  But that`s a little bit of what Trump is trying to do.  And that`s

– no, I think you`re right.  I think that`s a little bit of what Trump has

been trying to do when he has these sort of impromptu moments and he has

these sort of explosive outbursts that we see in the last 24 hours is to

ignite that side of it and sort of push that part of the conversation. 


So where do you stand?  Are you with me, remember I`m the fighter. 


MATTHEWS:  I know.  It`s what you do.  You change the question. 


Thank you, Michael Steele, for expertise that I agree with.  It`s awful,

it`s dishonest but sometimes it works. 


Adrienne Elrod, thank you.  You didn`t want to do anything dirty.


Up next, time to bring in – bring back the battle cry of the Watergate

days, release – in this case, release the transcript. 


You`re watching HARDBALL.




MATTHEWS:  A mystery remains about President Trump`s conditioning of U.S.

military aid to Ukraine on his getting dirt from the Ukrainian president on

his political enemies.  Was there as the president has said a word for word

transcript of that conversation?  Is there somewhere among the government`s

hidden documents a verbatim account of what Trump said and how many times

and ways he told the Ukrainian president that if he wants America`s good

will, including the weapons he needs to fight the Russians, he better come

up with dirt on Joe Biden. 


Trump says a word for word transcript exists and he released a pair of good

reasons to believe just that.  A memo of the conversation I said released

only has a third of the time of the reported 30-minute conversation with

President Zelensky.  There are also ellipses in the memo that indicate that

patches had been removed. 


And clear there is a mystery as to whether we`re getting a full record of

Trump`s dealings with the Ukrainian leader on that July 25th phone call. 

Until those questions are answered and the mystery is resolved, I`m

inclined to paraphrase the battle cry of the Watergate days: release the



That`s HARDBALL for now.  Thanks for being with us. 


“ALL IN WITH CHRIS HAYES” starts right now. 






Copyright 2019 ASC Services II Media, LLC.  All materials herein are

protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,

distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the

prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter

or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the