Biden to represent moderate wing. TRANSCRIPT: 7/31/19, Hardball w/ Chris Matthews.

Guests:
Adrienne Elrod, Danielle Moodie-Mills, Symone Sanders, J.A. Moore, Dina Titus
Transcript:

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

 

ARI MELBER, MSNBC HOST:  Thanks for watching THE BEAT tonight.  Thanks to

Chuck Nice, Tara Dowdell and all of our great guests.  I`ll be back at 9:00

p.m. Eastern anchoring debate coverage tonight.  Brian Williams takes over

after that.

 

But don`t go anywhere because “HARDBALL” starts now.

 

CHRIS MATTHEWS, MSNBC HOST:  Rematch.  Let`s play HARDBALL.

 

Good evening.  I`m Chris Matthews out in Detroit again.

 

Well, the candidates will take the stage in the next hour for round two of

the second democratic debate here, and all eyes will be on center stage, of

course, as frontrunner, former Vice President Joe Biden gets a rematch for

Senator Kamala, Harris, whether he wants one or not.  Biden has said he

plans to be less polite in tonight`s debate.  Biden campaign officials told

NBC News the former V.P. plans to take the fight directly to President

Trump, but won`t take any attacks on his record lying down.

 

Well, today the former Vice President made clear one thing he plans to

fight for tonight.  He released an op-ed column going after his democratic

rivals on the issue of healthcare.  His campaign also released a video

showing his opponents struggling to discuss their own healthcare plans.

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

NORAH O`DONNELL, CBS HOST:  How much would Medicare for all cost?

 

SEN. CORY BOOKER (D-NJ):  So a couple things.  First of all –

 

O`DONNELL:  Just quickly, so that people would know how much it would cost.

 

BOOKER:  But again –

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, the former Vice President will be flanked tonight at

center stage by Senators Harris and Cory Booker, who has criticized Biden

in recent weeks over his role in crafting the 1994 crime bill.  So we`re

going back a quarter century tonight for this debate.

 

Anyway, earlier this week, Senator Harris previewed her strategy for

tonight`s debate.  Let`s watch.

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

SEN. KAMALA HARRIS (D-CA):  My mother raised me to be polite, and I intend

to be polite.

 

It is my intention to do as much as possible to use that time on the debate

stage to talk with the American public about the issues they care about and

the issues that wake them up at 3:00 in the morning.

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, Senator Harris, of course, got a major boost after her

confrontation with Biden in the polls in last month`s debate over her

legislative – his legislative work with segregationist senators and his

record on court-mandated busing.  She hit him on those issues.

 

But according to Politico, the former V.P. is prepared this time for a

pile-on.  He is expected to fire back both at Booker for his time as

Newark, New Jersey Mayor when police were racially profiling citizens, and

then Senator Harris who supported a controversial truancy law in 2010 when

she was Attorney General in California.

 

For more, I`m joined by Adrienne Elrod, former Senior Adviser to the

Hillary Clinton campaign, John Heilemann, MSNBC National Affairs Analyst,

and Danielle Moodie-Mills, Sirius XM Radio.  Thank you all for joining us

right now.

 

I want to go through the list as I`ve listed.  John Heilemann, tonight,

everybody is watching this fight.  It`s like a heavyweight fight between

the reigning heavyweight in the polls and someone who may well end up the

nominee, but it`s moving up certainly.

 

JOHN HEILEMANN, MSNBC NATIONAL AFFAIRS ANALYST:  Yes.  And, look, I mean,

Chris, you got Joe Biden who took those blows in the first debate.  His

numbers have bounced back to a large extent.  But there is no one,

including no one around Joe Biden in the Joe Biden campaign who doesn`t

recognize the stakes here that the calling card for this candidacy is that

he is the one best equipped to take on Donald Trump, and that two bad

debate performances would put a huge dent in that aura.

 

So there is expectation and a fair amount of nerves on the part of the

people around Biden about whether or not he is going to be able to bounce

back in this debate and prove again that he is the guy to go after the

President of the United States.

 

MATTHEWS:  Let me go to Adrienne.  It seems to me Biden challenges Biden. 

He has to look at the – he is not being threatened in the numbers by Cory

Booker, who is about 1 or 2 percent at the most.  He is not really being

threatened even by Kamala in the numbers.  His challenge is to hold his

numbers.

 

ADRIENNE ELROD, FMR. SENIOR ADVISOR, CLINTON CAMPAIGN:  Well, that`s

exactly right, Chris.  He`s got to rise to the occasion tonight and play

more offense than defense.  I mean, he`s got a record going back to when he

was 29 years old, when he was first elected to Congress.  He is now 76.  So

if he allows every single person on that debate stage tonight to attack him

on his record, he is not going to do very well.

 

And his team knows that.  He knows that.  He`s got some of the best

campaign operatives in democratic politics today working on his campaign. 

They`re fully aware of the stakes.  And I think he`ll rise to the occasion

tonight.

 

MATTHEWS:  Danielle, what would you think it`s going to look like tonight? 

Give us a little preview of let`s go after Cory Booker, let`s go after

Kamala.  They`re the ones who really have nothing to lose.  Certainly,

Booker has nothing to lose.  He is about two points.  Kamala is one of

those two or three people, maybe four who could be the nominee right now,

looking at the numbers.

 

DANIELLE MOODIE-MILLS, SIRIUS XM HOST:  Yes, I mean, absolutely.  I think,

one, we saw Kamala Harris perform extraordinarily well in Miami, and we

know that she is going to come out strong

 

Look, Biden has been running from his record, and that`s what he showed us

in the last debate.  So he needs to stand strong.  He needs to show the

American people that he is somebody that can play into days` political

game, not bring us back to yesteryear, not give us promises of working

across the aisle when we know that republicans are not interested in doing

that, but that he`s ready to play today`s game.

 

And I think last night, we saw the moderate versus liberal wing of the

Democratic Party.  And, frankly, America doesn`t want a moderate right now. 

They want somebody who can handle the big issues.  And so Joe Biden has a

tall order tonight to be able to prove to the American public that he is

ready.

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, there is one thing missing in the conversation last night

about legislation.  They`re all talking about legislation, basically,

things, programs they`re going to push through, Medicare for all, the whole

thing.  And I kept thinking, wait a minute, there is something missing

here.  You need 60 votes in the U.S. Senate.  That means you need a big

majority, a super majority for any of these programs.  You can maybe play

around with the tax system, but you can`t do anything in terms of programs

without 60 senators.

 

John, you start here.  What world are they talking about in 2021 when we

have 47 democratic senators now with an unlikely ability to even get 50,

let alone 60?

 

HEILEMANN:  Yes.  I mean, Chris, I think they`re talking a little bit along

the lines of what Governor Bullock said last night from the stage.  There`s

a little bit of a wish list quality to some of the democratic proposals.

 

It is the case that there are a lot of democrats who think that the more

cautious, more pragmatic style of politics that Hillary Clinton practiced

in 2016 did not work against Donald Trump.  And so now, the argument goes,

you need to have a full-throated progressive point of view that will

enliven the base and drive turnout if you`re going to try to beat Donald

Trump.

 

I don`t think that has very much to do in this conversation.  It has very

much to do with governing.  People are kind of saying, worry about

governing later.  We`ve got to figure out at how we go about beating Donald

Trump.

 

And to come back to Joe Biden, I mean, it`s one of the things that`s a

little bit of a conundrum with Biden, right?  He is seen as the one who is

most likely or best equipped by a lot of democrats to take on Donald Trump. 

At the same time, he also has this vision of the Republican Party, which is

a vision that is kind of outdated.  I think we can somehow figure out how

to do business of the Republican Party.

 

And that is another problem that he has with this electorate.  Most

democrats look at that and say, dude, the Democratic Party cannot do

business with these republicans.  You can`t pretend like that old vision of

the Republican Party still obtains.  And Biden is going to face challenges

on that front too going forward probably tonight on this debate stage and

as this campaign progresses.

 

MATTHEWS:  Danielle, your thoughts about this, just in terms of promises to

the voters.  I mean, people have been promising voter stuff for the whole

history of this country they can`t deliver.  But what I listened to last

night, I kept thinking how does this happen?  How does this happen in a

political division we have in our country now which is roughly 50-50?  How

do we make good on these commitments made last night?

 

MOODIE-MILLS:  I mean, here is the thing, Donald Trump hasn`t made good on

one thing that he has put forward.  So I think right now, what we`re

looking for is visionary leadership.

 

And to John`s point, you know, the fact of the matter is that Donald Trump

has been lying to the people for so long.  And the idea that the Republican

Party has totally backed him, and then you have Joe Biden coming out and

giving us this kind of nostalgic idea of the Republican Party and working

across the aisle.  I think, yes, we have to find a way to work out these

big ideas in Senate that if Mitch McConnell is still in control of it,

we`re going to be in a lot of trouble.

 

But the idea is here, we need somebody that has big ideas, big vision to be

able to solve some of our big problems.  And maybe if a democrat gets into

office, that`s going to be done through executive orders if Mitch McConnell

is still going to be playing the Grim Reaper role.

 

MATTHEWS:  You can actually do this through executive order, creating a

Medicare for all program?  I mean, I don`t understand how you do that.

 

MOODIE-MILLS:  We will have to find ways in which to work around the Senate

if, in fact, Mitch McConnell is still the leader of the Senate at that

time.  They will have to work around and they`ll have to find the maneuvers

and the political strategies in order to be able to do that.  Because

working with the Senate, if Mitch McConnell is in power is not going to be

an option.  So democrats are going to have to get creative.  Republicans

have not been playing by the rules this entire time.

 

MATTHEWS:  Do you have any thoughts about this?

 

ELROD:  I do, Chris.

 

MATTHEWS:  H how do you work around the U.S. Senate.  I mean, it`s a great

idea.  I think you can do some things by executive order.  But these major

visionary proposals are going to take the approval of the U.S. Congress,

and usually 60 votes in the U.S. Senate.  That`s just the fact.

 

ELROD:  Yes, Chris.  You`re simply not going to be able to pass some sort

of Medicare for all plan by executive order.  And we`re not going to be

able to get pass – democrats cannot pass that plan with a senate majority

that is ruled by Mitch McConnell, that is ruled by republicans.

 

And I think that`s what Joe Biden is planning on here.  That`s one of his

tacks.  He is saying, you know, what, look, I was part of the team that

passed Obamacare.  I know there are some things that need to be fixed, but

I also don`t think we need to overhaul the entire healthcare system.

 

A lot of Americans feel that way and a lot of Americans remember how hard

it was to pass Obamacare in 2009.  I was working on the Hill at the time,

Chris, and it was a very difficult, very carefully crafted plan to pass,

but it passed.

 

MATTHEWS:  And you had Ted Kennedy.

 

ELROD:  And you had Ted Kennedy.  To actually overhaul the system right now

it`s nearly impossible.

 

MATTHEWS:  And, you know, I think you got a great proposal.  I wish I could

get up in the morning tomorrow morning and figure out a way to deal with

Mitch McConnell because he has been awful.  John Heilemann, maybe you`ve

got the plan, because I think it takes a visionary president.

 

I agree with Danielle.  Somebody could go and shout from the rooftops. 

This guy is an obstructionist.  He is closing down everything we are trying

to do.  We can`t get anything past this guy.  This is not democratic.  This

is just obstructionism.  And how do you beat him so that republicans are

finally embarrassed by this guy and people like Mitt Romney break loose or

Susan Collins or somebody?

 

Is there any way to beat Mitch McConnell, honestly, John Heilemann?

 

HEILEMANN:  Well, Chris, I think you know that the only way to beat Mitch

McConnell is with actual raw political power, and that power is going to

come from the ballot box.  So, you know, a situation in which Donald Trump

suffered a devastating large landslide loss in 2020 and democrats either

retook control of the United States Senate or came close, I would say

actually, probably they would need to take control of the United States

Senate.

 

That scenario that takes McConnell out of the majority leader`s job and

that makes the Republican Party recognize that they are paying a giant

political price for having gone into bed and fully into bed with Donald

Trump might change the dynamics on the Senate side.

 

But I don`t think there is some clever procedural way around this.  I don`t

think there is a clever – there is a kumbaya way around this.  You can`t

work with him and I think you can work around him.  I think you`ve got to

go straight through him and you`ve got to beat those Senate Republicans in

order to give yourself the kind of power and leverage that will be able to

change the game.

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, tonight`s debate comes against the backdrop of President

Trump`s ongoing attacks targeting members of Congress of color.  Here is

how some of the candidates at last night`s debate confronted the

President`s embrace of racial division.

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

SEN. BERNIE SANDERS (D-VT):  What Trump is doing through his racism and his

xenophobia is demonizing a group of people.  And as president, I will end

that demonization.

 

REP. BETO O`ROURKE (D-TX):  We`ll call his racism out for what it is and

also talk about its consequences.

 

SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN (D-MA):  We live in a country now where the President

is advancing environmental racism, economic racism, criminal justice

racism, healthcare racism.

 

SEN. AMY KLOBUCHAR (D-MN):  There are people that voted for Donald Trump

before that aren`t racist.  They just wanted a better shake in the economy. 

And so I would appeal to them.  But I don`t think anyone can justify what

this president is doing.

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Let me go back to Danielle.  I want to ask you a tough question. 

I`m not sure what your answer is, so this is wide open from my end.  Do you

have a sense that, you know, traditionally, and tradition is not so great

if you`re a person of color in this country, traditionally, the candidates,

they run white people, except for Obama, it`s been white people running for

president and vice president.  Do you think this is one time where the

ticket has to reflect our diversity?

 

MOODIE-MILLS:  I think, just in general, we need a ticket that is going to

be reflective of somebody that can beat Donald Trump.  And if that happens

to be a Kamala Harris and a Warren ticket or, you know, whoever is winning

at that time, then that`s who we need to go with.

 

But the fact of the matter is, yes, Donald Trump is a racist, but he is

using racism as a distraction from the fact that the impeachment walls are

closing in on him.  And that needs to be uplifted as well.  It`s not

diversity for diversity`s sake.  We need somebody who is going the beat

Donald Trump, beat him on policy, beat him on measure, and restore some

type of sanctity, some type of decency to American politics right now,

which is completely absent under his rule.

 

MATTHEWS:  Did it bother you that ten democrats were on the stage last time

before national television audiences in so many networks and none of them

raised the issue of impeaching Donald Trump, Danielle?

 

MOODIE-MILLS:  Yes.  I think that it`s – we need to be talking about

impeaching Donald Trump on a day-to-day basis.  And we need to be talking

about it not because we don`t like him, because he`s a republican, but

because he`s a national security threat to the United States, and that

every day, he is doing something that puts the American people in danger,

and that his racism is, in fact, a distraction, and that we need to be

talking about it and calling it out because he is using his base as a way

to move them on their racism and to divide us.  And it`s something that we

cannot stand for.

 

But at the same time, he is doing it because he is running scared.  He is

scared of the big I, which is impeachment, that I believe is coming for

him.

 

MATTHEWS:  Okay.  Thank you so much, Danielle Moodie-Mills.  Thank you,

Adrienne Elrod right here, and John Heilemann, thank you.

 

Coming up tonight on HARDBALL, more on tonight`s big rematch tonight

between Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.  Everyone is going to be watching

center stage tonight.  Will Biden show more passion and spontaneity that he

lacked last time?  I`m going to talk to surrogates for both the Biden and

Harris campaigns on their debate strategies for tonight.

 

And for years, Mitch McConnell has worn his hyper-partisanship and

obstructionism as a badge of honor.  But now, the nickname Moscow Mitch has

hurt his feelings.  Joe scarborough, who coined that wonderful phrase,

joins me tonight live on HARDBALL.

 

Much more ahead tonight in this hour.  Stick with us.

 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

 

MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL.

 

In tonight`s democratic presidential debate, all eyes will be on former

Vice President Joe Biden and Senator Kamala Harris, who will meet center

stage for the first time since last month`s dramatic encounter.

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

HARRIS:  There was a little girl in California who was part of the second

class to integrate her public schools, and she was bused to school every

day.  And that little girl was me.

 

JOE BIDEN, FORMER U.S. VICE PRESIDENT:  It`s a mischaracterization of my

position across the board.

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Since then, a month ago, you`ve seen the two candidates willing

to take the gloves off.  Here they go.

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

REPORTER:  What did you mean when you said you`re not going to be as polite

in the next debate?

 

BIDEN:  We`ll see.

 

HARRIS:  I will express differences and articulate them, and certainly

point out where we have differences of opinion, because I believe that

democrats and the American voter have a right to know that.  But there is

no reason we can`t be polite.

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, Biden campaign officials tell NBC that the former veep is

not naive about being attacked by other Democrats, but he is fully prepared

to point out where other candidates may not be as on solid ground as they

think they are when they attack him. 

 

For more, I`m joined by Symone Sanders, senior adviser to the Biden

campaign. 

 

Symone, thank you. 

 

This is the rematch, Ali-Frazier.  You know what I mean?

 

(LAUGHTER)

 

MATTHEWS:  Everybody is looking to see how this is going to go.

 

How is Joe going to be different this time? 

 

SYMONE SANDERS, BIDEN CAMPAIGN SENIOR ADVISER:  Look, I think Vice

President Biden uniquely understands that he will be a target on that stage

for a number of people.

 

But he also knows that the American people are tuning into the debate

because they want to hear his plans for the future, specifically, Chris,

when we talk about health care. 

 

So you can expect us to draw stark contrasts between ourselves and the

other folks on the stage, but also President Trump. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Yes. 

 

S. SANDERS:  I mean, look, there was a lot of stuff that went down this

week from the president`s Twitter feed that, frankly, Chris, is

unacceptable. 

 

He launched racist attacks over in Baltimore, on Congressman Cummings, OK? 

 

MATTHEWS:  Hey, I`m with you.  OK, let`s – everybody watching this show

agrees with you.

 

I want to ask you, how does he deftly take an attack, for example, from

Cory Booker about how he stood on a crime bill back in `94, 26 years ago,

25 years ago, and turn it into 2020?  How does he go from `94, the history,

all to way to the future, which you say – how do you do that in one quick

response? 

 

S. SANDERS:  In 60 seconds or 30 seconds. 

 

MATTHEWS:  How do you do that?

 

S. SANDERS:  Well, look, Chris, I will say this. 

 

Look, Vice President Biden is proud of his record.  And we can talk about

records.  He also wants to talk about the future.  But if we want to talk

about records, you can expect Vice President Biden to say, in 2007, when

Cory Booker was then – Senator Booker was then a mayor, talking about

being tough on crime, Vice President Biden, then Senator Biden, was

introducing a bill in the Senate to end the crack cocaine-powder disparity. 

 

So, we can talk about records.  We`re more than happy to do that.  But I

think the American people want to talk about the future. 

 

MATTHEWS:  He had an interesting role as V.P. for Obama. 

 

I think he was a guy who tried to make – he was sort of like in the old

days Ed McMahon and Johnny Carson.  He was the regular guy.  Carson was a

big, aloof – you`re too young to know this, I guess, but a bit aloof. 

 

And he sort of made Obama`s very intellectual – sort of an intellectual

visionary – he brought him back to regular people.  I always say he put

the apostrophe in Obama.  You know what I mean?  He made him a regular guy. 

 

Now I think he`s trying to get back to sort of remind people of that.

 

How does he remind them of something that was so recent, but yet seems so

long ago?  Isn`t weird? 

 

S. SANDERS:  It`s kind of strange, Chris. 

 

(CROSSTALK)

 

MATTHEWS:  Obama said…

 

S. SANDERS:  But then people want to pretend as though Vice President Biden

was not the vice president to President Obama for eight years and worked

alongside him in the White House on everything from the Recovery Act that

benefited and helped folks right here in Michigan, particularly right here

in Detroit, to housing. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Saving the auto industry. 

 

S. SANDERS:  Saving the auto industry. 

 

So, you can expect I think we`re going get those questions tonight, Chris. 

And the vice president is going to talk about it, because that is his

experience.  That goes directly to his experience and how he is equally

positioned to do well. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Can you do me a favor?  Can you do me a favor?  See where we`re

standing right now? 

 

S. SANDERS:  Yes. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Right after the debate, I want you to bring the vice president

right here.  OK?

 

(LAUGHTER)

 

S. SANDERS:  Well, we will see what we can do, Chris. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Because everybody wants to hear from him.  Everybody wants to

hear from him. 

 

And if he wins, he should come in here.  But if he is too tired, I would

understand. 

 

S. SANDERS:  Oh, no, no. 

 

(CROSSTALK)

 

MATTHEWS:  I`m just teasing. 

 

S. SANDERS:  You know him.  You know him. 

 

MATTHEWS:  I`m teasing. 

 

(LAUGHTER)

 

MATTHEWS:  Get him over here. 

 

Thank you, Symone.  You`re a great guest, a great surrogate.

 

S. SANDERS:  Thank you so much.  Thank you.  Thank you. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Thank you, Symone Sanders.

 

Well, back in January, Senator Harris, Kamala Harris, was asked if Joe

Biden would make a good president.  And here`s what she said then. 

 

(BEGIN AUDIO CLIP)

 

HARRIS:  I think there are many people who would make a good president. 

And I got to know Joe as a person through Beau.  They had an incredibly

special relationship. 

 

You`re not going hear me criticize Joe Biden.  I think he is a great guy. 

 

(END AUDIO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, after the first debate`s pointed out – pointed exchange

between the two of them, Senator Harris was asked why her position on the

vice president had changed so much. 

 

Let`s take a look. 

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

HARRIS:  I have no intention of attacking Joe Biden, but I am going to

point out our differences of opinion. 

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, who is also running

for president, accused Senator Harris of playing politics there. 

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

REP. TULSI GABBARD (D-HI), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE:  Levying this accusation

that Joe Biden is racist, when he`s clearly not, as a way to try to smear

him, this is just a political ploy, and I think a very underhanded one,

just to try to get herself attention, to move herself up in the polls. 

 

I think that we need to be above that, all of us. 

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, for more, I`m joined right now by State Representative

J.A. Moore.  He is from South Carolina.  He is co-chair for Kamala Harris`

presidential campaign. 

 

Thank you, Representative.

 

J.A. MOORE (D), SOUTH CAROLINA STATE REPRESENTATIVE:  Thank you for having

me.

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, let`s talk about tonight.  I was just talking to Symone

about this thing. 

 

How do you see this fight tonight?  Because you notice how CNN has

positioned there in the center?  They want Ali-Frazier here.  They want the

fight. 

 

How is it going to look tonight? 

   

MOORE:  Listen, it`s not going to be a fight.  What it`s going to be is

Senator Harris…

 

MATTHEWS:  It was last time. 

 

MOORE:  Well, what Senator Harris did was articulate her point, making sure

that the American people know that she is the only candidate that can take

on Donald Trump. 

 

And what she was doing is just giving contrasts.  So, it definitely wasn`t

a fight.  And what…

 

MATTHEWS:  OK, wait a minute. 

 

You have seen the pictures.  How many times do you see it?  She turned

over, leaned around the guy next to her, and leaned over and pointed to

him.  That was a fight. 

 

MOORE:  That definitely wasn`t a fight. 

 

MATTHEWS:  It wasn`t a fight?  How come it looked like one?

 

(CROSSTALK)

 

MOORE:  Well, listen, here`s what I want to say. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Sure, go ahead.

 

MOORE:  The most important thing is what we`re focused on now, is making

sure the American people know that Senator Harris will fight for them. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Right. 

 

MOORE:  That`s the most important thing, not fight against any of the other

candidates, because, at the end of the day, when Senator Harris is the

nominee, we need to all come together as a party. 

 

So, that`s the most important thing.

 

MATTHEWS:  What do you think about – but maybe there is something going in

American politics now, but we`re really focusing a lot on things that were

25, 26 years ago. 

 

And maybe that`s good.  Is it? 

 

MOORE:  Listen…

 

MATTHEWS:  I mean, we`re going back and arguing about the crime bill back

then.  We`re talking about incarceration patterns then were set and

mandated – mandated sentencing and things like that. 

 

Is that helpful as we chart our way to beating Trump? 

 

MOORE:  I think so. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Is that a smart route? 

 

MOORE:  Well, I think it`s important, if you have an over 40-year record

you, have to examine it. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Sure. 

 

MOORE:  I mean, I think that`s an important thing.

 

MATTHEWS:  How about somebody who doesn`t have any record? 

 

MOORE:  Well, you have to examine that non-record. 

 

MATTHEWS:  That`s a lot more fun attacking…

 

MOORE:  That`s right. 

 

MATTHEWS:  … the guy with 40 years, isn`t it? 

 

MOORE:  Well, listen, it`s not about attacking him. 

 

You have to be able to look at a person`s record to see how they`re going

to govern. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Yes. 

 

(CROSSTALK)

 

MATTHEWS:  Because I thought, in the beginning of this campaign, Biden was

sort of in first place with all the numbers.  We all saw the same numbers. 

And Kamala was coming on, the new kid on the block, sharp as hell, great

record, moving in there.  I said, this would be a hell of a ticket. 

 

Is it still possible either way?  Is it a ticket possibly still? 

 

MOORE:  Well, I think we`re far aways – away from making that kind of

decision. 

 

And I am definitely not going to make any announcements tonight about that.

 

MATTHEWS:  OK. 

 

MOORE:  But what`s important for us to remember is, right now, what Kamala

is trying to do is really talk about her 3:00 a.m. agenda, when you talk

about her plan for Medicare for all. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Yes. 

 

MOORE:  And I`m going to tell a personal story, if I have a second. 

 

My business partner – my business partner and really close friend,

Clifford Smith (ph), passed away just last Thursday. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Yes. 

 

MOORE:  He had cancer.  He did not have health insurance, 70 years old. 

So, I know firsthand the importance…

 

MATTHEWS:  Right.  He never got treated? 

 

MOORE:  Well, he got treated, but he was paying out of pocket. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Yes. 

 

MOORE:  And you know how expensive that can be. 

 

MATTHEWS:  I can imagine. 

 

MOORE:  And so, for me, this is – it hits me very personal. 

 

I have a daughter that is going to be born in like a couple of days.  And

under Kamala Harris` plan, she will automatically get into Medicare for

all.  That`s important. 

 

My friend Clifford, if he was uninsured, would have automatically got into

her plan. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Yes. 

 

MOORE:  I mean, this is important. 

 

And so it`s important that we obviously talk about a person`s record. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Right. 

 

MOORE:  But we also have to talk about the future. 

 

MATTHEWS:  How do you finance something like that, when you have 60

Republican senators – or you have 47 Democrats in the U.S. Senate, you

have a bill that`s going to have to be financed?  Something has got to pay

for all this. 

 

MOORE:  That`s right. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Medicare now, pay for it.  You work for 50 years now, from the

time you`re 15 to the time you`re 65, to pay for your own health care when

you retire. 

 

MOORE:  Right.

 

MATTHEWS:  Who is going to pay for your health care your whole life under

this new plan?  I`m just curious, who is paying for it? 

 

MOORE:  But if you actually study her plan, what it talks about is that

there`s a lot of things we can do as far as the tax program with large

corporations. 

 

MATTHEWS:  So the corporations pay for everybody`s health care? 

 

MOORE:  No, no, no, no, definitely not, not pay for everyone`s health care. 

 

If you also look at a plan, it`s anyone making above $100,000 will pay a

larger portion for affordable health care.  That`s important.  That`s

important. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Yes.  I agree.  OK, I think we`re going have to pay for part of

it. 

 

Thank you.  Thank you, Representative Moore of South Carolina. 

 

MOORE:  Thank you very much.

 

MATTHEWS:  Up next:  His new nickname, Moscow Mitch, is reportedly giving a

little stomach problem to the majority leader. 

 

We will be getting to that now.  Will it be enough to get him to finally do

something about election security?  I don`t think so.  But it certainly

caught his attention, and he now thinks a lot about Joe Scarborough, who

gave him that wonderful nickname. 

 

And Joe joins us live in just a minute on HARDBALL. 

 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

 

MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL. 

 

After blocking several election security bills in the wake of Robert

Mueller`s testimony last week, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has

come under increasing pressure to protect our elections against Russian

interference. 

 

And last week, McConnell`s stonewalling prompted “Washington Post”

columnist Dana Milbank to call him a Russian asset for refusing to defend

his country from Moscow`s attacks. 

 

But it was MSNBC`s Joe Scarborough who rolled out a new nickname for

McConnell, which he hammered him home on Friday. 

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

JOE SCARBOROUGH, CO-HOST, “MORNING JOE”:  I want to hear about Moscow

Mitch. 

 

(LAUGHTER)

 

SCARBOROUGH:  Moscow Mitch, that being Mitch McConnell of Moscow, Kentucky,

Moscow Mitch blocks two bills. 

 

Moscow Mitch. 

 

Moscow Mitch. 

 

Moscow Mitch keeps killing any bill that would protect American democracy. 

 

But I want to talk about Moscow Mitch. 

 

Moscow Mitch. 

 

Moscow Mitch. 

 

Moscow Mitch. 

 

He is aiding and abetting… 

 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE:  Yes. 

 

SCARBOROUGH:  … Vladimir Putin`s ongoing attempts to subvert American

democracy. 

 

Moscow Mitch won`t even let the Senate take a vote on it. 

 

UNIDENTIFIED MALE:  Joe…

 

SCARBOROUGH:  That is un-American. 

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, “The New York Times” reported yesterday that McConnell`s

incensed by that nickname, which has spread to all across social media,

thanks to Joe. 

 

And now the Associated Press is reporting that the nickname is even

catching on in his home state of Kentucky, where he faces reelection.  You

are seeing people with signs there. 

 

Even President Trump had to deny that McConnell was acting like a stooge

for Moscow. 

 

Here is how Trump attempted to defend his buddy in Kentucky. 

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:  Mitch McConnell is a man

that knows less about Russia and Russian influence than even Donald Trump. 

And I know nothing. 

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, the question now, will the pressure on Moscow Mitch, as he

has come to be known, prompt him to do something about the Russians and

what they`re doing to us?

 

We`re joined next by the man who made up the nickname that seems to be

sticking, Joe Scarborough. 

 

You`re watching HARDBALL. 

 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

 

MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL. 

 

Criticism of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell continues to resonate

after he blocked legislation intended to protect American elections from

Russians. 

 

Anyway, sensing an opportunity, Democrats have kept the pressure on

McConnell and his fellow Republicans. 

 

Here is Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer today:

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY):  Using paper ballots, not partisan.  Making sure

that our machines are safe from hacking, our election machines are safe

from hacking, that`s not partisan. 

 

Giving the states resources to better manage their elections, that`s not

partisan. 

 

That`s American.

 

And I would say to my Republican colleagues, where are you?  Why aren`t you

telling the Republican leader that we ought to do something? 

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  I`m joined right now by Joe Scarborough, co-host of MSNBC`s

“Morning Joe.” 

 

Joe, a couple of things. 

 

Were you watching?  When you watched the debate last night, were you kind

of stunned by the unreality of a lot of the arguments about how they`re

going to do this big health care, they`re going to rich – tax all the

rich, they`re going pay for health care, they`re going to pay for

everything, hearing aids, teeth, dentures?

 

I mean, everything, they`re paying for, and it`s all going to come from

this new program they`re going to pass through the Senate. 

 

And I kept thinking, it takes 60 senators to get any of that through, if

it`s programmatic.  And you got Mitch McConnell there with the majority

control of 53 right now. 

 

How do you beat him?  How do you get anywhere near 60 senators, if you`re a

Democratic presidential candidate? 

 

SCARBOROUGH:  Well, it really is unbelievable that the Democrats kept going

on and on about how they were going to provide universal health care to

Americans, instead of talking about how Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell

have spent the last three years trying to strip health care coverage from

millions of Americans… 

 

MATTHEWS:  Right. 

 

SCARBOROUGH:  … trying to strip preexisting protections for millions of

Americans, trying to do all of these things, while they give the biggest

pharmaceutical companies on the planet and they give the biggest

multinational corporations regarding health care massive tax cuts. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JOE SCARBOROUGH, MSNBC CO-HOST, “MORNING JOE”:  Well, it really is

unbelievable that the Democrats kept going on and on about how they were

going to provide universal health care to Americans instead of talking

about how Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell have spent the last three years

trying to strip health care coverage from millions of Americans. 

 

CHRIS MATTHEWS, MSNBC HOST:  Right. 

 

SCARBOROUGH:  Trying to strip preexisting protections for millions of

Americans, trying to do all of these things while they get the biggest

pharmaceutical companies on the planet and they give the biggest

multinational corporations regarding health care massive tax cuts. 

 

So I sat there saying wait, wait, you`re facing Mike Tyson next year, and

this is like a Princeton diner`s club having intramural squabbles instead

of taking the fight to Donald Trump.  And they just didn`t do it. 

 

And by the way, Chris, you`re completely right.  Union members in

Youngstown, Ohio, as Tim Ryan was saying are sitting there going wait a

second.  You`re going to give me health care for life.  You`re going give

me free dental.  You`re going give me free everything, and wait, I`m

supposed to give up my union contract for that? 

 

No.  They`re not going to do it. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Right. 

 

SCARBOROUGH:  And it`s every bit as unrealistic as Donald Trump promising

in 2016 that he would going to provide universal health care, that

everybody`s deductible is going down and they`re going have better

coverage.  Democrats need to say we`re for universal health care and the

other side is against it.  Let`s work together to beat Mitch McConnell, to

beat Donald Trump.  And to assure that Obamacare which is a big deal, Biden

was right about that, that Obamacare is mended and not ended. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, let`s talk about how you get after McConnell.  You got

under his skin, obviously, Moscow.  I mean, this reminds me of Tokyo Rose,

and he didn`t like it one bit.  I think he heard Tokyo Rose.  It`s

questioning whether he really cares about our country or simply maintaining

his majority more than this country. 

 

What do you think is going on in his quarter right now?  What are you

hearing about his burning from this thing? 

 

SCARBOROUGH:  Well, I hear they`re upset, but I think Americans actually

have every right to be upset because think about this, Chris, I –my dad,

my dad`s a Kentucky native.  My mom and dad met at the University of

Kentucky.  My dad dragged the family around.  We used to follow Adolph

Rupp`s Kentucky Wildcats throughout the late `60s and `70s. 

 

And my dad would have never understood any American doing what Mitch

McConnell`s doing right now. 

 

The CIA, the Republican appointed director of the CIA, the Republican-

appointed director of the FBI, the Republican-appointed director of

national intelligence, I mean, the Republican-appointed Department of

Homeland Security chief, the United States military have all said

explicitly, here we go, are you ready for this?  That Russia poses a grave

threat to American democracy. 

 

They said that.  Not Democrats, not talk show hosts on MSNBC.  The FBI, the

CIA, the DNI, the United States military, all said that Russia was doing

that, and we needed to try to stop it. 

 

And, Chris, he`s not just killing Democratic bills to protect us from

Putin`s meddling, he is killing Marco Rubio`s bill that simply says if we

catch you meddling in our elections and undermining American democracy, we

will sanction you.  Can you believe Mitch McConnell even killed that bill? 

That`s not just wrong.  That`s un-American. 

 

MATTHEWS:  I`m with you.  Let`s go to – coming out of Trumpland today

attacks Congressman Elijah Cummings again.  It`s eliciting criticism that

Trump is using a strategy of racial division coming into the 2020 campaign. 

 

However, according to “The Wall Street Journal,” the president`s advisers

concede the tweets are necessarily helpful to Trump`s reelection efforts

but said they mark yet another case of the president prioritizing the

personal over the political, whatever that is. 

 

What do you think?  Do you think Trump is doing this like surgically

saying, I`ll get this racial number in right now, and next year near the

election, oil cool it down, I`ll cool my jets.  I`ll have gotten the people

I want behind them, some of the rough people.  I`ll have them behind me and

then I can become a regular president for a while, while the Democrats run

a socialist against me or a very hard left candidate and I`ll be the middle

of the road. 

 

Do you think he is calculating like that or he just has bad instincts on

race? 

 

SCARBOROUGH:  You know, we`ve seen it before.  You`ve seen it.  I`ve seen

it.  Presidents get elected a certain way.  Everybody tells them they`re

never going to get elected, and whether it`s Donald Trump or Barack Obama

or George W. Bush or Jimmy Carter, whoever it is, they go into the White

House thinking wait a second, everybody was wrong about me. 

 

Even George H.W. Bush, one of the most humble men in the White House, once

asked an adviser when he was losing in 1992, if you`re so GD smart, why

aren`t you president? 

 

So Donald Trump because of James Comey`s letter, because of a lot of

different things got elected in a once-in-a-lifetime anomaly.  And he

thinks that he can play that game again. 

 

But what he is doing is by being racist, by attacking these individual

members of congress, he`s chasing off the suburban voters.  He is chasing

off women.  He is chasing off voters who – remember, I think I saw it on

your show last night.  He was very proud that they stayed at home.  That

black voters stayed at home and didn`t vote for Hillary Clinton. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Yes. 

 

SCARBOROUGH:  Well, guess what?  Guess what?  They`re going to be

mobilized.  People of color are going to be mobilized, and Donald Trump is

going to pay for it. 

 

So, it`s really shortsighted.  I don`t understand why he is doing it.  And

anybody that thinks that`s going to help him win the Philly of suburbs –

the suburbs of Philly, have never been to the suburbs of Philly. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Yes, I know. 

 

Hey, Joe, the way you described his lucky punch reminds me of Ingemar

Johansson, the Swedish boxer who won the heavyweight championship of the

world.  He had one punch, his thunder and lightning punch.  He never won

again. 

 

Thank you, Joe Scarborough, for talking about – 

 

SCARBOROUGH:  All right.  Thank you, Chris.

 

MATTHEWS:  – the once in a lifetime Trump victory in `16. 

 

Anyway, with 114 Democrats in the House now, 114 backing impeachment, are

we approaching a tipping point?  A few more and Speaker Pelosi may be

facing a pro impeachment majority in her own caucus. 

 

HARDBALL back after this.  Don`t go anywhere. 

 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

 

MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL.

 

It`s been one week since former special counsel Robert Mueller testified on

Capitol Hill, and the number of House Democrats now supporting impeachment

or impeachment hearings against Trump continues to rise.  Since Mueller`s

testimony, 20 more House Democrats have joined the list.  The total number

now of House members, Democrats, 115, 114 are Democrats, that includes

independent Congressman Justin Amash. 

 

But while Democratic candidates attack President Trump 34 times during last

night`s debate, not once in all those two hours did any candidate for

president mention the word “impeachment.”

 

I`m joined by Democratic Congresswoman Dina Titus of Nevada, who announced

her support for an impeachment inquiry just this week, and Michelle

Goldberg, columnist for “The New York Times.”

 

Congresswoman, let me ask you a couple of question.  Let`s start with the

obvious one.  Last night, nobody brought up impeachment.  They`re running

against Trump, and they never bring it up. 

 

What do you think that`s about? 

 

REP. DINA TITUS (D-NV):  Well, I don`t think they were asked about

impeachment by the narrators, and they were trying very much to present

themselves, show they were strong and talk about maybe too many intricacies

of policy. 

 

MATTHEWS:  You mean to tell me that politicians need to have the

interviewer bring up a topic?  I`ve been following this thing for 100

years.  I got to tell you something, you politicians have no problem

bringing up a topic if you want to.  Why didn`t anybody want to bring it up

last night? 

 

TITUS:  Well, I don`t think it has to do with the fact that they don`t

support impeachment, because the presidential candidates were some of the

first to come out in favor of it.  I just think they were more focused on

comparing themselves to each other than they were to attacking the

president. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Well said.  Well said.  Thank you. 

 

Second question, why do most Democrats in the House of Representatives

oppose even beginning an impeachment inquiry, even beginning it?  Most of

your caucus members in the House, Democrats are against even beginning a

process.  Why? 

 

TITUS:  Well, I think we`re reaching a tipping point where it will be a

majority.  It`s like that hourglass, the closer you get to the end, the

faster it runs.  I think they have different reasons. 

 

Some are in swing districts.  They don`t know what impeachment will mean

for their voters.  Some are very loyal to Nancy Pelosi.  Some are

conducting their own investigations and don`t want to give up that

jurisdiction.  I think it`s a combination. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Let me go to Michelle.  You`ve been watching this.  What do you

think is going on right now in the House? 

 

Is it an hourglass that`s moving faster?  Is it accelerating and time to

get this thing rolling and time to get it done, or at least started? 

 

MICHELLE GOLDBERG, THE NEW YORK TIMES COLUMNIST:  Well, it`s clearly

rolling.  And I also think it is started.  You know, when people say that

they want Nancy Pelosi to come out in favor of an impeachment inquiry,

basically, she would have the House vote to instruct the Judiciary

Committee to begin an impeachment investigation. 

 

Well, the Judiciary Committee has begun an impeachment investigation.  That

was what happened last Friday when it in that legal filing that it

submitted in the lawsuit to get the underlying grand jury testimony.  So

the process has begun.  I guess the question is –

 

(CROSSTALK)

 

MATTHEWS:  I don`t agree.  I don`t agree, because historically, you have to

vote for an impeachment resolution.  Richard Nixon, the House passed that

in February of `74. 

 

GOLDBERG:  Right, right.  But, but, the Judiciary Committee – 

 

MATTHEWS:  I mean, don`t you have to say you`re going to investigate?

 

GOLDBERG:  No, the Judiciary Committee had already begun its work before

the House in the Nixon impeachment voted then to sanction it.  And what the

people on the Judiciary Committee will argue is that yes, that`s been the

process in the last two presidential impeachments there, but there`s no

about the way impeachment is supposed to be conducted. 

 

The Constitution doesn`t say anything about how an impeachment inquiry is

to be sanctioned.  It`s not the House rules.  When they impeach judges,

often the Judiciary Committee begins the process on its own. 

 

And so – and clearly, Nancy Pelosi is behind this strategy, or at least is

in favor of this strategy of now they`re going to court and saying we are

conducting an investigation into whether or not to recommend articles of

impeachment to the full house. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Well, today, Republican Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana

presented an ultimatum to Democrats over the issue of impeachment.  Let`s

listen. 

 

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

 

SEN. JOHN KENNEDY (R-LA):  If the Democrats, Democratic friends feel that

strongly about it, then they need to go hard or go home.  You know, stop

talking about it.  Go to Amazon, buy a spine and do it.  But if they`re not

going to do it, then they need to accept the fact that Donald Trump is

president of the United States and they need to let him go about doing his

job. 

 

(END VIDEO CLIP)

 

MATTHEWS:  Let me go to the congresswoman again.  When do you have to begin

this process formally of looking at impeachment if you`re going to do it

this Congress? 

 

TITUS:  Well, I think you need to do it sooner rather than later, because

the closer you get to the election, the more it`s just going look

political.  But I think you need to do it.  You can`t have it both ways. 

 

You know, the power to investigate and oversight is not in the

Constitution.  That`s an assumed power.  And over time, the court has

broadened it and narrowed it.  But the power to impeach is in the

Constitution, and that gives us more authority I believe to subpoena

people, to get information, to really turn the dial. 

 

MATTHEWS:  Michelle, do you think they`re going to impeach Trump? 

 

GOLDBERG:  At some point, I think they will.  I mean, I think that you have

 

MATTHEWS:  This Congress? 

 

GOLDBERG:  I think that – 

 

MATTHEWS:  OK, I disagree. 

 

GOLDBERG:  I think you`re getting very close to a point where – 

 

MATTHEWS:  I don`t think they will.  I think it`s a reasonable bet. 

 

GOLDBERG:  Look, you`re going to get very close to a point where a majority

of Democratic congressmen come out for impeachment, and a super majority

clearly believe that he merits impeachment, right?  There is no question

about whether he has committed high crimes and misdemeanors.  The only

debate is about whether this is politically viable and politically smart. 

 

MATTHEWS:  It`s a hell of a proposal.  I don`t think they`re going to get

218 for impeachment.  Fairly or not, I don`t think they`re going to do it. 

I think there are too many Democrats that are worried about their own

reelections. 

 

Thank you, Dina Titus of Nevada. 

 

Michelle, I read you all the time.  You`re a great reporter, a great

columnist. 

 

Don`t go away.  You`re watching HARDBALL.

 

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

 

MATTHEWS:  Welcome back to HARDBALL.

 

Tune in to MSNBC tonight for post-debate coverage starting at 10:30

Eastern.  I`ll be back right here in the spin room. 

 

And by the way, I predict Biden will focus the debate on good versus evil,

the Democrats against President Trump, not against each other.  We`re going

to get a better sense after tonight of who could be the best contender to

go head to head with the man who has spent his presidency stoking racial

division. 

 

That`s HARDBALL for now.  Thanks for being with us. 

 

“ALL IN WITH CHRIS HAYES” starts right now. 

 

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY

BE UPDATED.

END   

 

Copyright 2019 ASC Services II Media, LLC.  All materials herein are

protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,

distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the

prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter

or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the

content.>