FBI Arrests Trump ally Roger Stone. TRANSCRIPT: 1/25/2019, Hardball w. Chris Matthews.

Guests:
Gregory Meeks, Amy Klobuchar, Jonathan Lemire, Joaquin Castro
Transcript:

Show: HARDBALL
Date: January 25, 2019
Guest: Gregory Meeks, Amy Klobuchar, Jonathan Lemire, Joaquin Castro

CHRIS MATTHEWS, MSNBC HOST: Caveman. Let`s play HARDBALL.

Good evening. I`m Chris Matthews in New York.

And what a day it has been. We are covering two smashing news stories
tonight both pummeling the Trump presidency. The arrest of his long-time
dirty trickster in political intimate in the Russia probe, Roger Stone.
And Trump`s big cave in the shutdown reopening the federal government
without getting a single penny for his prized wall.

The President now faces the rat of his far right base like Ann Coulter who
tweeted today, Trump is the biggest wimp ever to serve as President of the
United States. Wimp.

Much more on that crushing Trump headline coming up.

We begin with today`s arrest to Roger Stone in the predawn raid of his home
by the FBI in Florida where he was later hauled before a judge in shackles.
Stone been charged with several criminal counts including witness
tampering, obstruction, and five counts of making false statements to the
Congress.

Most significant is the indictment draws the Russia investigation a big
step closer for the highest levels of the Trump campaign. It indicates
that Mueller has evidence directly related to the core of his mandate which
is to investigate quote “any links and/or coordination between the Russian
government and individuals associated with the campaign of President Donald
Trump.” closed quote. In other words today`s indictment of Roger Stone
appears to be exhibit A in a case of collusion. Got it?

In detailing his alleged lies, by the way, the special counsel today Stone
as a key link between the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks, a front for Russian
intelligence which can played a crucial role in the Kremlin`s campaign to
screw with the American electric. It was Julian Assange of WikiLeaks who
released over 50,000 stolen Democratic emails all hacked by Russia in a
deliberate effort to inflict maximum damage on Hillary Clinton during the
2016 election.

The indictment today suggests that Stone knew what was coming from the
Russian hackers even before WikiLeaks released the first batch of emails.
Quote “around June and July of 2016 Stone informed senior Trump campaign
officials that he had information indicating WikiLeaks had documents whose
releases would be damaging to the Clinton campaign,” closed quote.

Then after the first batch of DNC emails was released in late July quote “a
senior Trump campaign official was directed to contact Stone about any
additional releases and what other damaging information WikiLeaks had.
Stone thereafter told the Trump campaign about the future releases of
damaging material by WikiLeaks.

As of tonight we don`t know the identity of that quote “senior Trump
campaign official” or the person who directed them to contact Stone.
Here`s what told reporters after his appearance in shackles before a
Florida court today.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ROGER STONE, FORMER TRUMP CAMPAIGN ADVISER: After a two-year inquisition
the charges today relate in no way to Russian collusion, WikiLeaks
collaboration or any other illegal act in connection with the 2016
campaign. At the crack of dawn, 29 FBI agents arrived at my home with 17
vehicles with their lights flashing. When they could can simply have
contacted my attorneys and I would have been more than willing to surrender
voluntarily. As I have said previously there is no circumstance whatsoever
under which I will bear false witness against the President, nor will I
makeup lies to ease the pressure on myself.”

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Joining me right now is Texas Democratic congressman Joaquin
Castro who is a member of the House intelligence committee, former federal
prosecutor Glenn Kirschner, Maya Wiley who is a senior vice President for
social justice at here in New York and MSNBC legal analyst Danny Cevallos.

Danny, I want to know about this. Tell us about how this brings this in
the, I guest, to the heart, I believe it does, of the Russia probe.

DANNY CEVALLOS, MSNBC LEGAL ANALYST: It does and it doesn`t. You look at
all the conduct alleged in this indictment that Roger Stone isn`t actually
charged for. He is charged for obstructing justice, for lying, for
persuading witnesses corruptly. That relates to everything that happened
after the investigation began. But far more compelling is the information
before Roger Stone allegedly committed those crimes. And it leaves open
the question, does the special counsel have enough information about Roger
Stone`s conduct with WikiLeaks or whatever the organization is to charge
him or do they not yet have it and they are waiting until they get an air
tight case to charge him? Because then and only then when those dots
connect up will we have evidence of Russian collusion.

MATTHEWS: Glenn, what do you think about this? I have a different view.
I think that Roger Stone knew dam well it was coming from Russia because
everybody on the planet knew it was coming from Russia and he knew what he
was doing and as being a link, which is the key word, in the mandate of
this probe. Get all the links between Russia government people and the
Trump campaign. He clearly is a link. Your thoughts.

GLENN KIRSCHNER, FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR: Yes, Chris. This is an
incremental step towards a bigger conspiracy indictment that is absolutely
coming. And you know it is funny because this indictment reads like a
conspiracy indictment. It has the building blocks of a conspiracy
indictment but it doesn`t yet charge the conspiracy. That`s obviously for
tactical reasons.

This is one incremental step that the Mueller team will use to try to break
Roger Stone and bring him on board because goodness knows he would be a
treasure trove of information about on Donald Trump, having a decades` long
association with him.

And you know what? Either roger Stone will break and see the light or he
will die in prison. But this is just one incremental step and the next big
step is probably an overarching conspiracy indictment.

MATTHEWS: And this is quite a scene I have known Roger Stone somewhat of a
distance, luckily, for years. He had the weirdest look on his face today.
He looked like he was enjoying this moment of whatever.

MAYA WILEY, FORMER COUNCIL TO NEW YORK CITY MAYOR: He absolutely was. I
mean, he is the one who said, you know, it`s better to be talked about than
not. And he doesn`t care if being talked about means being talked about as
he stares down the barrel of a prosecutor`s gun.

And it`s rather staggering. I mean, I want to go back to the point that
Glenn made. You know, we are talking about a man who says he doesn`t want
to bear false witness, who literally – we have email exchanges in which
he`s fabricating lies about Hillary Clinton`s health in the context of the
indictment and we know from Jerome Corsi himself, asked Jerome Corsi to
lie.

MATTHEWS: Or be punished physically by him. I mean, it is frightening
this “Godfather” stuff the way he threatened this witness.

WILEY: And called him a rat.

MATTHEWS: Anyway, the indictment alleges Stone communicate with conspiracy
theories Jerome Corsi and radio host Randy Credico about making contact
with WikiLeaks. While at the same time he kept can in touch with people
close to the campaign.

For instance, Stone wrote to a supporter involve would the Trump campaign
saying spoke to my friend London last night. The pay load is still coming.
Later that day a supporter involved with the trump campaign asked Stone via
text message if he had heard any more from London. Stone replied yes.
Went to talk on a secure line.

And then after the release of Jin Podesta`s emails on October 7th, quote
“an associate of a high-ranking Trump official sent a text message to
Stone, it read, well done. Well that associate who congratulate
(INAUDIBLE) is unknown his boss, the high-ranking campaign official, has
been identified as Steve Bannon.

Congressman, thank you. I don`t know. You guys up with the hill have to
decide whether to impeach this President and I`m wondering how close this
gets to getting to the heart of the matter, the belly of the beast, which
is was Trump directly or indirectly working with the Russians to beat
Hillary Clinton?

REP. JOAQUIN CASTRO (D-TX), INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE: I think right now we
still don`t know that conclusively whether he personally was. I believe
his campaign was the indictment today shows that, that there was basically
a chain of people that went from the Trump organization, high up to the
Trump organization, to WikiLeaks that had stolen or received stolen emails
and then dumped them. I think we will find out ultimately before this is
all over whether Donald Trump knew or didn`t know and whether he
participated.

MATTHEWS: If you found out that a lot of your campaign people whole bunch
of them were working together to work with Moscow to defeat an opponent,
would you feel responsible? It seems extraordinary that the fish rats from
the head. I wonder if Trump is a victim or a potential target of a RICO
charge because he was running a criminal enterprise here, it seems to me.
Your thoughts.

CASTRO: Yes. And you tell that it`s getting harder for Sarah Sanders to
keep denying that this has nothing to do with the President as it gets
closer and closer to the President. And you know, I`m not surprised that
Roger Stone has been indicted for making false statements. That was I
think, of all the interviews we were in, the one interview where when the
interview was done, everybody was pretty sure that he had lied to the
committee. Because he took contradictory – he made contradictory answers
or gave contradictory answers to questions and so we knew both things
couldn`t be true.

MATTHEWS: Well, Roger Stone has said he never spoke to Trump about
WikiLeaks. Now there`s a great case can of hiding from the truth by saying
certain things. I never talked to him quote about WikiLeaks. He may have
just talked to him about getting dirt on Hillary from this interesting
source. Let`s watch.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

STONE: I can honestly say that candidate Trump, Donald Trump, President
Trump and I have never discussed the WikiLeaks disclosures before, during
or after –

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Well, that`s hard to fathom in light of today`s indictment which
alleges Stone lied about discussing WikiLeaks with several members of
Trump`s campaign. Furthermore, Stone admitted during the election, he was
frequently in touch with Trump.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: How often do you talk to him?

STONE: From time to time. I mean, not on a daily basis but from time to
time.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: When is the last time you talked to him?

STONE: Saturday.

We talk from time to time. I decline to characterize the content of those
conversations.

I speak to Donald Trump yesterday. He`s in good spirits.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Can you divulge to us, Roger, and I respectfully answer
this question, some of those middle of night phone conversations you had
with Mr. Trump?

STONE: You know, I really can`t and it`s been my policy not to discuss
personal conversations or it will end, honestly.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Danny, give me a psychological profile of the guy we just heard
from there. He seem to want to tease the idea he is on the inside and then
if asked a legal question he gives you a very careful denial.

CEVALLOS: He is like (INAUDIBLE) of public statement. He is teasing the
information. He is getting everybody getting everybody excited but he has
a very legal ease type answer. The reality is speaking as often as he did,
some of his statements, not just to Congress but to us were inconsistent
and it becomes very not credible to actually believe that he never spoke
with Donald Trump about WikiLeaks when we have that montage of Donald Trump
discussing WikiLeaks on an almost ongoing basis. It stretches the
imagination that Donald Trump in all of his conversations and his close
relationship with Roger Stone would never have brought up WikiLeaks, which
apparently was Trump`s favorite conversation.

MATTHEWS: And of also the President is publicly and notoriously known for
having asked the Russians to give him any information they have on
Hillary`s email. I think that might come up in conversations with Roger
and the President.

WILEY: Well, he literally is asking Corsi what we now know as Jerome Corsi
to go get the emails from Julian Assange two days before Donald Trump
publicly says, come on, Russia. If you can find, get us those 30,000
emails. It`s a two-day break in time.

You know, the other thing, just going back to the way the Trump campaign
worked and this notion, we don`t know. So this is not something we know in
terms of what Trump knew and what conversation he had. But we do can know
this campaign was a family run business.

MATTHEWS: Yes, the Romanoffs. As I mentioned Stone is also charged. This
is really - this is a “Godfather” staff. For witness tampering, for
allegedly threatening and pressuring Randy Credico not to contradict his,
Roger Stone`s testimony before the House of Representatives.

Among other things, Stone told Credico to plea the fifth like Michael
Potenialo (ph) the fix character “Godfather II” who was intimidating into
keeping quiet. Now Roger Stone also told Credico, you are a rat, a stuly,
you back stab your President, run your mouth for lawyers. Are you dying to
rip you? I think lawyers are dying to rip you in shreds. He also said
let`s get it on, prepare to die, expletive.

Glenn, I don`t know. This is mob talk. He`s threat thing guy physically
or whatever. I don`t know how you describe it. Go ahead.

KIRSCHNER: Yes, you know. It`s ridiculous. And, you know, Stone may like
the parse words. He doesn`t parse them well or credibly. And you know, as
you were just saying, President Trump talked with everyone in the world
about loving the WikiLeaks and what they are providing but he didn`t talk
to Stone about it.

Again I think Stone will probably fold like a cheap lawn chair and come on
board and, you know, Bob Mueller can back up with three pieces of evidence
and convicting Stone at trial on this will be a cake walk.

MATTHEWS: Yes.

Congressman, I made a similar return. And I believe you are, too. Were
you concerned this guy can be guilty as hell? He could be a bad dude in
every possible way - immorally, legally, politically. Were you happy with
the way they picked up today with 29 agents, guns drawn, long rifles, put
them in shackles, the whole region.

I think criminal justice should only be administered by - voting by a jury.
Don`t beat up the kids in the car in the way to the police station like
they used to do in the bald old days. Don`t do perp walks to humiliate a
guy. If the person is guilty, they get the penalty set by a jury and
judge, not in a kind of extra pipe. What do you think of the way this guy
was picked up at dawn?

CASTRO: You know, I missed a lot of the coverage because I was on to the
airport for a flight back home. And I know that there was a debate whether
there was a media tipped off so they can recorded. And CNN said that they
weren`t tipped off and so forth.

I think yes, people should be judged in a court of law. There has been a
lot of media speculation and a lot of discussion about this. So I think
that`s all fair.

MATTHEWS: Does it concern you as Democrat, a person of public life that
people get picked up this way.

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: Does it concern you as a Democrat, a person in public life that
people get pick up this way. I have seen this kind, congressman, by the
way. A friend of mine is member of Congress years ago got picked up like
this so that all the neighbors would see it. There was some – the agents
want all the neighbors to see this guy was under investigation. Your
thoughts.

CASTRO: Sure. Yes, I don`t think, Chris, that we should go out of our way
as a government to humiliate people. I also don`t know what dangers or
what concerns the agents of the FBI may have had. But yes, I don`t think
we should go out of our way to publicly humiliate somebody on their way to
taking them down to the station basically.

MATTHEWS: I think ends don`t justify the means but the ends were certainly
valid.

Thank you so much U.S. Congressman Joaquin Castro of Texas, Glenn
Kirschner, Maya Wiley and Danny Cevallos. Thank you all.

Much more on this huge story tonight, including a unique look at Roger
Stone`s long history as a Washington dirty trickster. I have known the guy
for years. I have got video of Stone that shows just how important and
intimate a figure he is in Donald Trump`s political world. He is not some
hanger on. He was in the belly of the beast. Well, you are not going to
miss what`s coming up. Stick around and watch where getting to the heart
of who Roger Stone really is.

The other big story tonight, President Trump, the man who build his brand
as the mater deal-maker has caved. Get that word caved. It`s going to be
all the headlines tomorrow in a big way. The government is reopening for
now and some of Trump`s friends on the far right are not happy. They are
calling him a wimp. He won`t like it.

You are watching HARDBALL right after this.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.

After five weeks and two missed paychecks for more than 800,000 federal
workers, an end to the longest federal government shutdown in history is
now coming into view.

President Trump caved on his demand for a border wall – we know that now -
- agreeing to open the government without the wall.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I am very proud to announce
today that we have reached a deal to end the shutdown and reopen the
federal government.

(APPLAUSE)

As everyone knows, I have a very powerful alternative, but I didn`t want to
use it at this time.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Well, the president tried to paint the announcement, as you see,
as a victory, but the deal notably includes not a nickel for the wall.

Instead, it funds the government for three weeks, until February 15, and
leaves the issue of $5.7 billion for a border wall aside for further
negotiations.

But the president left on the table the prospect, as you just heard, of
taking another drastic action.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

TRUMP: So let me be very clear: We really have no choice but to build a
powerful wall or steel barrier.

If we don`t get a fair deal from Congress, the government will either shut
down on February 15 again, or I will use the powers afforded to me under
the laws and the Constitution of the United States to address this
emergency.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: And just a short time ago, the House joined the Senate in passes
legislation to temporarily fund federal agencies. The package now goes to
the president for his signature.

Anyway, the blowback for Trump was swift from at least one hard-right
commentator. Within minutes of Trump`s remarks, Ann Coulter tweeted that
the president was – quote – “the biggest wimp ever to serve as president
of the United States.”

His retreat over the wall, of course, also marks the second time this week
Trump capitulated to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who`d insisted on no
negotiations for the wall until the government was reopened.

The speaker and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York addressed
reporters shortly after the president`s spoke.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

QUESTION: Speaker Pelosi, did the president underestimate you politically?
And can you assure the public that there won`t be another impasse in three
weeks?

REP. NANCY PELOSI (D-CA), SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE: I can`t assure the public
on anything that the president will do.

But I do have to say I`m optimistic. I can`t characterize the president`s
evaluation of me.

QUESTION: Do you think that he thought he could get what he wanted?

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY), MINORITY LEADER: I think he thought – no one
should ever underestimate the speaker, as Donald Trump has learned.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: From more, I`m joined by Democratic Congressman of New York
Gregory Meeks, and Jonathan Lemire, White House reporter for the Associated
Press

Congressman, as a politician what do you think of the standoff this week?
It looks like the president caved in, lost 100 percent, it`s all lost for
him.

REP. GREGORY MEEKS (D), NEW YORK: Well, Nancy Pelosi is the master
negotiator.

She said all along that we needed to get back to the table only when the
American people get back to work. That`s what`s happening, from the
beginning. So we could have avoided all of this if he had just listened to
Nancy Pelosi in the beginning.

MATTHEWS: But he listened to Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter.

(LAUGHTER)

MEEKS: Well, clearly.

And they don`t know how to run a government. And they could see that they
were losing and had lost the American people because of the Trump shutdown
in the very beginning.

And so now, as Nancy has said, because Democrats all along, we want border
security, but we want sensible and reasonable border security. And I think
that the format that they are putting together, that working like it is a
conference committee…

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: Yes, the regular way.

MEEKS: That`s right, with six Democrats, six Republicans in both House and
Senate, sit down with the experts, so that we can talk about how do we
really secure the borders and hire judges and law enforcement and make sure
we have drones and electronics that`s up to date, that`s what you do.

That`s what Nancy Pelosi was talking about from day one.

MATTHEWS: You think Trump would buy a smart solution like that, that
really dealt with border enforcement, or he just wants this symbolic brick
wall?

MEEKS: Well, I think that he`s now backed into the corner, because when
you`re a con man…

MATTHEWS: He`s not going to get the brick wall, is he?

MEEKS: No.

When you`re a con man, sometimes, the con is up, OK? He started conning
the American people in the beginning, when he said he`s going to build a
brick wall, and Mexico`s going to pay for it. The con is up. He can`t do
that.

MATTHEWS: It`s interesting to watch. Thank God we have video now, so you
can watch some of these meetings.

A couple weeks ago in the Oval Office itself, he started to talk her down.
I know the tricky situation Nancy`s in right now. She can`t really speak
for the House Democrats. She had a little leadership challenge there.

And he calls her Nancy. And she just called him on it. She just said,
don`t talk to me about my political situation and my leadership.

And now she`s gotten an object – he`s gotten an object lesson from her.

JONATHAN LEMIRE, ASSOCIATED PRESS: There`s no question that one of the
results of the shutdown is that her power has only increased, and there is
no question, as an equal to him in Washington, which drives him, privately,
sort of insane.

This is obviously – it`s a good news story that workers are going to start
getting paid again. But this is a loss for this White House, and they know
it. If this – if “The Art of the Deal” had been this negotiation, no one
would have bought that book.


The White House saw the writing on the wall last night after those votes in
the Senate, those two dueling bills that passed. There was a sense of
resignation there. They knew they had to move towards this.

It was just a question of trying to spin it in some sort of victory today,
trying to sell it to Republicans that it`s not entirely cave. But, of
course, we`re seeing that media on the right not buying it.

MATTHEWS: OK.

Let`s look at some of the language before this happened about what the word
cave really means.

Earlier this month, Senator Lindsey Graham had a warning about what it
would mean for Trump if he gave in on his demand for a border wall.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. LINDSEY GRAHAM (R), SOUTH CAROLINA: If he gives in now, that`s the
end of 2019 in terms of him being an effective president. That`s probably
the end of his presidency.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Well, some headlines in conservative media today bolstered that
point.

Breitbart wrote – quote – “Government open and border, no wall, still no
SOTU.”

Anyway, while “The Washington Examiner,” which is a conservative paper,
said, “Trump blinks.”

One former Trump administration official, by the way, told NBC News the
move was a – quote – “total cave, unless he calls national security
emergency when he doesn`t get the wall fully funded.”

Congressman, I have to ask you about this, because, at the end of this
three-week sort of cooling-off period, like we used to say in labor issues,
three weeks of cooling off, if the president says – goes on television
from the Oval Office and gives one of these John F. Kennedy kind of things,
this is a national emergency, we have to secure the wall, I`m doing it with
the funds from – available funds from the Defense Department, what would
the Congress do?

Can you stop him?

MEEKS: Look, the emperor at that point won`t have any clothes because of
the negotiations between Democrats, Republicans, House and Senate. Put
something on his desk.

Then, if he tries to go against all his Republican senators – I think what
was significant yesterday, if you look at the Senate vote, we had six
Republicans voted with Democrats. In fact, the Democratic alternative had
more votes than Republicans.

That showed him that he`s losing all of the senators.

MATTHEWS: Do you think Mitch McConnell, who has been obdurate in defending
Trump, would let his Republican conferees agree to a compromise on border
security that didn`t include a physical barrier?

MEEKS: Mitch McConnell is in trouble too, because you understand the
behind-the-scenes meeting there from his members who are up for election in
2020.

They`re trying to protect their own you-know-what.

MATTHEWS: Thank you.

LEMIRE: And the national emergency threat, it may be one that doesn`t have
much in the way of teeth.

The White House looked into this a few weeks ago, seriously considered it,
and sort of backed away, in part because they don`t feel like they`re going
to get much support from Republicans on this. They are afraid Republicans
on the Hill are not going to be willing to give up that sort of power to
the executive branch.

And, moreover, they`re afraid of setting a precedent for some future
Democrat president to come in and declare a national urgency for some sort
of liberal cause.

MATTHEWS: As a reporter, can you identify who gets credit for this deal,
tonight`s deal?

LEMIRE: I mean, the – Mitch McConnell`s reemergence is what broke this.

And because he engaged in the process, the White House realized they had to
move.

(CROSSTALK)

MATTHEWS: Because of the fear you mentioned?

MEEKS: That`s exactly right.

LEMIRE: That`s right.

And Speaker Pelosi, of course, deserves a ton of credit for holding her
ground and claiming what is unquestionably a win for her. Her power has
increased. She outmaneuvered the president over these last – over this
last month.

MEEKS: There`s a check on the president now.

MATTHEWS: Let`s talk theatrics.

I know you`re a serious politician. But this is theatrics. Trump walks
out with that usual strut of is, the open coat, the big long overcoat, the
tie eight-feet-long, and he swaggers out, even though it`s about three
degrees out in Washington.

He comes out and swaggers out, as if he had won.

MEEKS: Well, look…

LEMIRE: He`s a salesman. That`s what he does.

MEEKS: Well, salesman, con man, that`s what he does.

If you talk about the art of the deal, if the art of the deal is going
bankrupt, that`s Donald Trump. He`s gone bankrupt six times. And now in
the Financial Services Committee, there`s people that are going to be
looking at those dealings.

So there`s a big – there`s big things that`s are going on. There is a
check.

MATTHEWS: Guess who won?

I`m sorry to interrupt. There`s Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House…

MEEKS: Yes.

MATTHEWS: … signing the bills to get the government wide open.

Is he going to all her Nancy anymore? Or is that over?

LEMIRE: Well, I thought it was very interesting.

MATTHEWS: That`s his nickname for her.

LEMIRE: In the Oval Office of the other day, he said, Nancy Pelosi, or, as
I call her, Nancy, which is not a devastating nickname from the president.

It`s been interesting that he has at this point – he doesn`t know what to
make of her. We knew before she was elected speaker he was telling people
around her – around him that he felt like she could – he could deal with
her, that he did respect her, that, yes, she`s been a useful whipping boy -
- or girl in this case, I guess, for Republicans for a long time.

They have raised a lot of money off of her name, but privately he thought,
like, I can negotiate with her, and then go on a rally stage and bash her.

But, right now, he has been utterly outplayed by the speaker.

MATTHEWS: And his usual nicknames, low energy, low I.Q.

LEMIRE: They don`t apply.

MATTHEWS: They don`t work here, thank God.

Anyway, thank you, U.S. Congressman Gregory Meeks of New York and Jonathan
Lemire.

Coming up: Between Roger Stone`s arrest today at dawn and Trump caving in
on the wall funding, it`s been a pretty rough day for Mr. President,
despite his costuming there.

So where`s all this taking us?

To talk about all of today`s big events and more, Senator Amy Klobuchar of
Minnesota – I think she`s running for president too, by the way – joins
us next.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ROGER STONE, FORMER TRUMP CAMPAIGN ADVISER: The charges today relate in no
way to Russian collusion, WikiLeaks collaboration, or any other illegal act
in connection with the 2016 campaign.

TRUMP: I am very proud to announce today that we have reached a deal to
end the shutdown and reopen the federal government.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.

Tonight, the White House is suffering huge casualties on two fronts. Both
are very bad for the president.

First, Trump`s longtime adviser and confidant Roger Stone was arrested,
placed in shackles, and indicted by the special counsel all this morning.
His indictment says he was in touch with senior Trump campaign officials
about the release of those WikiLeaks documents leading up to the 2016
election.

Then came the news that Trump caved on the shutdown, announcing a deal to
reopen the government without money for the border.

I`m joined right now by U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota.

Put it together. This is a historic day, Senator. And I – I don`t know
how – they both seem bad for Trump. What`s what`s in it for the country,
what happened today?

SEN. AMY KLOBUCHAR (D), MINNESOTA: What`s in it for the country is that
finally these workers are going to be able to go back to work.

And I was listening to the rightful praise of the work that Speaker Pelosi
and Senator Schumer and the rest of us did in standing our ground, and not
giving into the president, because every time he gut-punches you.

But the real credit are those workers, 800,000 federal workers doing their
jobs without pay. Everyone saw them at the airports, the prison workers,
the people at that – you name it, all of these security agencies, the FBI.
I served some of them lunch today in the food line just a few blocks from
the White House.

MATTHEWS: Yes.

KLOBUCHAR: It was an unbelievable thing that the president let this
happen. And those workers are back to work.

MATTHEWS: I think it`s stupid. And I wonder if the Democratic Party, of
which you`re a member, would be willing to say, no more government
shutdowns. There are no excuses for them. This shouldn`t be a tool, an
art – part of the art of politics, shutting down our government as sort of
an angry tantrum.

Can`t we – can`t the leaderships of both parties just say, never again,
we`re not going to do this anymore?

KLOBUCHAR: While, actually, Senator Warner has a bill, an interesting name
to it, the STUPIDITY Act, which looks at doing that.

And I know he`s going to do some work on that bill. And there should be a
way to do this, because these workers shouldn`t be a pawn. And that`s what
this president has allowed to happen to this country.

And the other thing about this, Chris, is, I think when you have heard
about the deals he made a New York, a lot of times, he would just walk away
from the table, maybe he wouldn`t pay people.

Well, I think he found out today that you can`t do that to an entire
country. You can`t do that to the people of America. And you can`t get by
without paying American workers.

MATTHEWS: We do – we`re looking at – it`s a little unfair because we`re
looking at a picture in the cross-screen from you, Senator, of Trump
walking onto the steps there at the Rose Garden at the White House, a very
historic spot, obviously, and he`s got his coat open.

And he`s got that ridiculous red tie about eight-feet-long. And he`s
strutting. He says now, just a minute ago, he put out the word that he
didn`t lose today. What do you make of that claim?

(LAUGHTER)

KLOBUCHAR: Well, the only people that lost really in this last 35 days
were the American workers and the American people.

And just to look at it as a win-loss game is just typical of things that
he`s said. But what we have to look at now is, what are we going to do
over these next three weeks? Because this thing is over, what, the day
after Valentine`s Day, right?

And the hope is that we can look at the security issues in a sensible,
smart way, look at the technology, look at some of the border crossings,
and not do what he was suggesting, which made no sense – many security
experts have said that – but instead look at what works best at the border
and stop this chaos and start governing from opportunity.

What I`m really worried about is what we`re not doing, pharmaceutical
prices still rising. And he talks a big game on that. We have got
proposals. We have to get them through. The ice sheet melting in
Greenland, reaching a tipping point, we have to start moving on climate
change.

And all the time he creates this chaos, it becomes harder and harder for
the country to move forward and to compete in this international economy.
And that`s what we have to get back to doing. And that is looking out and
having the backs for the American people, and not allowing him to create
more chaos.

So, if there was any win today, it was that finally someone said to him,
enough is enough. We`re going back to work.

MATTHEWS: Well, congratulations on being the first positive voice tonight
in this country. I`m glad to hear that.

(LAUGHTER)

MATTHEWS: By the way, Roger Stone joins a growing list of people in
Trump`s inner circle charged by special counsel Robert Mueller.

Look at this.

In addition to Roger Stone, you have the president`s longtime lawyer and
fixer, Michael Cohen, who pled guilty to lying to Congress. His campaign
chair Paul Manafort was found guilty on bank and tax fraud charges.
Manafort`s deputy, Rick Gates, pleaded guilty to similar charges.

Trump`s first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, pleaded guilty to
lying to the FBI. His campaign adviser George Papadopoulos also pleaded
guilty to lying to the FBI.

This list is Watergate-length.

KLOBUCHAR: You know, in another way today – talk about an I told you so
day – was for those of us who have been fighting to protect this
investigation, but also making the point that this is a national security
issue.

This is about another country trying to influence our election and hack
into campaigns and do things that were unbelievable in any other election
that we have seen in American history.

Well, this indictment really got us closer to the truth, because, in this
case, you have, in an indictment sworn under law, which says clearly that
someone in that campaign, a senior official, asked Roger Stone to go over
there and start communicating on the release of these e-mails.

It showed what they were doing to Hillary Clinton, what – they were trying
to undermine her by attacking her health and making things up about her
memory and other things.

This is exactly what we saw unfold before our eyes in the election. It
influenced the American people. And, again, our main goal in the Senate
right now is and should be to allow that investigation to complete its
course, so the American people can have the whole story.

And that`s why it`s so important that that report be released, so we really
know what happened. It`s the only way to prevent it from happening again.

MATTHEWS: Senator, I think that nails it.

Thank you very much for joining us tonight on this big, historic night.

KLOBUCHAR: Thank you. Thanks, Chris.

MATTHEWS: Up next: Who exactly is Roger Stone? By the way, stick around
for this one.

And how did he become the scariest person in American politics today?
Tracing the ties between a man notorious for his dirty tricks and the man
currently occupying the Oval Office, including some very interesting video.

We`re going to show you how close these two guys really are.

Stick with us for this horror show.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.

For roughly 50 years, Roger Stone, a Nixon acolyte and self-proclaimed
dirty trickster, has proudly peddled his trade in the dark underbelly of
American politics.

It was there he met Donald Trump. Trump served as Donald Trump –
actually, Stone served as Donald Trump`s first and longest-serving
political adviser, the relationship dating back decades. Stone has also
been closely associated with Trump`s 2016 campaign chair, Paul Manafort,
who`s currently in jail awaiting sentencing.

In the 1980s and `90s, Stone and Manafort were partnered together in a
lobbying and consulting firm. And, as “The Washington Post” noted at the
time, they had a list of clients that by 1988 already included Donald
Trump.

Stone continued to be an intimate and top political adviser to Trump as he
flirted multiple times with a White House bid.

In the 19 – actually, the 2016 documentary “Get Me Roger Stone,” Manafort
said this about Stone`s close relationship with Donald Trump:

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

PAUL MANAFORT, FORMER DONALD TRUMP CAMPAIGN MANAGER: Roger`s relationship
with Trump has been so interconnected that it`s hard to define what`s Roger
and what`s Donald.

While it will be clearly a Trump presidency, I think it`s influenced by a
Stone philosophy.

Rogers`s relationship with Trump, they both see the world in a very similar
way. If Trump is elected president. I think Roger will see one more very
significant impact he`s had on world history.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Up next: a piece of historical video that shows just how
important Roger Stone was to Trump`s political rise.

Back after this.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

QUESTION: How strong is your allegiance to President Trump?

STONE: I am one of his oldest friends. I am a fervent supporter of the
president. I think he is doing a great job of making America great again.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.

Roger Stone`s relationship with Donald Trump dates back nearly 40 years.
In fact, Stone joined Trump and his then girlfriend, the current first
lady, Melania, of course, at a 1999 HARDBALL College Tour – there they are
sitting together – when Trump was talking about a run for president back
in the year 2000.

That`s a close, interesting statement of his power.

Twenty years later, Roger Stone has become a huge viability – liability to
Trump`s future.

For more, I`m joined by David Corn, Washington bureau chief of “Mother
Jones” magazine, and Anna Schecter, of course, NBC News, investigative
reporter.

You first, David, and I want to get Anna to come in here and talk about
what she knows, more about Roger.

But this guy, it seems to me, was the classic, and is as long as he lives,
the dirty trickster of all times.

DAVID CORN, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Yes.

And he`s taken pride in being called that. But he`s not just a dirty
trickster. That sounds a little cute. He`s been a conniving conspiracy
theorist for decades now.

And he started off working, as you noted, with Paul Manafort as a lobbyist,
representing autocrats, dictators, thugs and oligarchs around the world.

He`s been involved in bunch of controversies, he sometimes claims more
credit than maybe he`s due, but trying to shut down the recount in 2000 in
Miami, getting dirt on Eliot Spitzer and forcing him out of office, putting
together an anti-Hillary campaign in 2008 that had an acronym as a title
that I can`t even say on a family-friendly show.

So he`s been lying, cheating, maybe stealing for a long time now, and it`s
kind of interesting. The indictment really shows that he`s really bad at
lying, just some very basic lies.

But he went into the House Intelligence Committee thinking he had a magic
shield, and could say whatever he wanted, and he wouldn`t be held account
for it.

MATTHEWS: How does he seduce these powerful figures like Richard Nixon and
Donald Trump? Why do they fall for him? What will he do for them? What`s
he do psychologically?

ANNA SCHECTER, NBC NEWS INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER: Well, here`s one of these
huge, larger-than-life New York characters. You know them.

We have covered them reporting, just like Donald Trump, and he`s got
charisma.

MATTHEWS: But I know great New York characters in person, like the late
Jimmy Breslin, but they were good guys. This is a bad guy. This is like
Roy Cohn bad, Roy Cohn famous.

SCHECTER: Well, he likes to actually give out that image.

And I think that gives him sort of a powerful image, that he`s willing to
go there, and he`s willing to go there, do the dirty tricks and get the job
done. And so far, until now, he`s gotten away with it.

MATTHEWS: Well, look at him here.

CORN: Yes.

MATTHEWS: He looks – David, he looks like he`s enjoying this, like I
always thought Nixon in some weird way liked all the attention of the
Watergate prosecution. In some sick way, he liked the attention, like a –
you know what I mean, a narcissist would.

CORN: Yes, we have all known Roger for many years. And I think narcissist
is a good word for – word for him. It also applies to Trump.

So maybe there`s a bond there . You used two magic words earlier, Roy
Cohn. Roy Cohn was a dirty, underhanded player who was Trump`s lawyer,
also a lawyer for the mob, and Trump loved him. He was a mentor in a lot
of ways.

So I think, when Roy left the scene, Roger was a natural person for Trump
to gravitate towards.

He also is – I mean, he`s a bit of a kook. He put out a book saying that
LBJ killed – killed John F. Kennedy.

MATTHEWS: Yes.

CORN: He put out a book during the last campaign saying that Bill Clinton
was tied to a series of murders. He`s a conspiracy theorist who hangs out
with Alex Jones.

And yet he was considered a VIP, a VIP at the Republican Convention for
Trump in 2016.

MATTHEWS: Where did these two meet, at some mixer, college mixer? Where
did they get together?

I mean, I`m kidding, because he`s an underworld figure in many ways, and
Trump seems to know a few underworld figures.

What`s – where did the matchup occur?

SCHECTER: They go back 40 years.

Roger Stone even knew Fred Trump before he knew Donald Trump. And it sort
of makes sense that that friendship would forge. And they really do have a
bond that`s developed over these years.

And you see the loyalty there.

MATTHEWS: Where did they meet?

SCHECTER: I actually don`t even know where they met. But it`s – they go
way back.

And Roger has been telling me for the last six months how they go way back,
he`s not going to turn on the president, but…

MATTHEWS: What is he doing sitting next to Melania at the president`s
event, a candidate – not even candidate, but Donald Trump, when he went to
Penn with us? He`s like he`s an escort.

(LAUGHTER)

SCHECTER: He`s – that`s an interesting word to use for Roger Stone,
actually.

He pushed the Manhattan Madam, Kristin Davis, to run for office in New York
and fund – was the backer of her campaign.

MATTHEWS: Is that how he got the stuff on Eliot Spitzer?

SCHECTER: That`s right. I mean, that was all part of it.

I mean, he loves this stuff. He loves to be right at the heart of the most
controversial thing that could happen.

CORN: And remember too – sorry, interrupting.

(CROSSTALK)

CORN: He was the political guru for Trump.

Trump was a business guy. But he talked about getting in, running for
president and for governor of New York many times. And Roger was always at
his side, egging him on.

And when he started this campaign in 2015, it was basically two or three
people there working with him, Roger Stone, Sam Nunberg, and that was it.
So he always has turned to Roger, this conspiracy theorist guy, for
political advice.

MATTHEWS: That`s all Donald Trump needed, was more bad influence.

Anyway, thank you, Anna Schecter, for your expertise about this guy, David
Corn, as always, sir.

Coming up: Roger Stone and the dirty tricksters in Washington politics.

We will be right back.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

MATTHEWS: The man arrested at dawn today once said it was better to be
infamous than not famous at all.

Roger Stone loves most of all being in the action. Stone was pushing Trump
for president even before Trump was.

That thing he said about being infamous, rather than not famous at all, is
the Roger Stone I have known for decades. He was telling the truth in this
case about himself.

And far from pushing dirt or trading in rumors, his more familiar role, he
was actually expressing his lifelong ambition. Stone wanted to be known –
maybe still does – as the master of the dark political arts, a primo dirty
trickster, the last, but still dangerous devotee of Richard Milhous Nixon.

There are a number of dirty tricksters in Washington politics, people known
for pulling off schemes that undercut their rivals. I think I know most of
the big ones, like the guy, presumably Paul Corbin, who stole Jimmy
Carter`s debate prep materials and got them to his rival, Ronald Reagan, or
Dick Tuck, the vintage Democratic dirty trickster, who drove candidate
Richard Nixon berserk.

There`s Donald Segretti, who committed some of the misdeeds of Watergate,
writing in the margins of one report, “Love this job.”

What has raised Roger Stone in the pantheon of the dark arts is his
relentlessness. That loyalty to mission, as well as person, is what makes
this Washington figure I have known for decades so dangerous. He doesn`t
quit.

This brings me back to what Roger Stone once said about it better to be
infamous than not famous at all. That`s something I could imagine Richard
Nixon himself saying. That`s if he were as outrageous a character as Roger
Stone.

And that`s HARDBALL for now.

“ALL IN WITH CHRIS HAYES” starts right now.

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY
BE UPDATED.
END

Copyright 2019 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are
protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the
prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter
or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the
content.>