Federal workers miss first paychecks. TRANSCRIPT: 1/11/2019, Hardball w. Chris Matthews.

Susan Page, Shermichael Singleton, Barbara Boxer; Richard Blumenthal

Date: January 11, 2019
Guest: Susan Page, Shermichael Singleton, Barbara Boxer; Richard

CHRIS MATTHEWS, MSNBC HOST: So what`s stopping them? Let`s play HARDBALL.

Good evening. I`m Chris Matthews in Washington.

At midnight tonight, this country hits the longest government shutdown in
U.S. history. In fact, here is what I heard when I called the White House
before the show.


UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: We apologize but due the lapse in federal funding we
are unable to take your call. Once funding has been restored our
operations will resume.


MATTHEWS: So don`t call the president of the United States.

Well, with hundreds of thousands of federal employees captured in the
stalemate, President Trump argued once again that it`s up to the Congress
to find a solution holding over in his threat to declare a national
emergency to pay for his wall.


to call a national emergency. I could do that very quickly. I have the
absolute right to do it but I`m not going to do it so fast. What we are
not looking to do right now is national emergency. What we want to do, we
have the absolute right to do it. In many ways the easy way out but this
is up to Congress and it should be up to Congress and they should do it.


MATTHEWS: Absolute right. Well, meanwhile, more than 800,000 federal
employees missed a paycheck for the first time today.


JIM GREGORY, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WORKER: It really hurts. We haven`t - we
can`t pay our bills, can`t pay the doctors, our mortgages.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: It`s like we are being held hostage.

DARRYL FLOYD, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WORKER: If you can`t pay the bills then
you are going toing have financial charges. And, you know, the creditors,
they may not accept it. So there is going call repression especially when
it`s me and my wife sometimes trying to work and with her situation.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: What`s her situation?

FLOYD: She has cancer. It`s in the hands of one person, which is our
President. And hope that he can understand or sympathize with the poor.


MATTHEWS: Well, this means that workers who were making it paycheck to
paycheck are not now making it.

The President said he would sign a bill passed by the House today ensuring
federal employees receive pay back when the government reopens and offered
this message.


TRUMP: The message is that I appreciate their service to the country.
They are incredible people, the federal employees that we are talking
about. I just really appreciate the fact that they have handled it so
incredibly well and many of them agree with what we are doing. We have no


MATTHEWS: While President Trump continues to dangle the prospect of
declaring a national emergency as a means of bypassing Congress. But the
“Wall Street Journal” reports that in a recent oval office meeting, White
House senior advisor Jared Kushner, his son in law, quote “argued an
emergency should only be invoked only if it create as clear path to the
White House to build a wall.”

Adding that according to sources close to the meeting, Kushner said let`s
stop doing things just to do them. Well, that sounds wise. But one of the
President`s top allies in Congress, Senator Lindsey Graham, is out there
pushing the President onward.

After meeting with the President at the White House today, he argued in a
series of tweets that Democrats don`t want to make a deal and later wrote,
Mr. President, declare a national emergency now, build a wall now. That`s
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina.

The White House is going ahead and directed the army core of engineers to
look at a budge - its budget in search for the money for the wall. So they
are pushing ahead.

NBC News reports one proposal could include tapping into billions of
dollars of disaster relief. Trump can could dip into the $2.4 billion
allocated for projects in California, including flood prevention as well as
the $2.5 billion set aside for reconstruction projects in Puerto Rica which
is still covering, as everybody knows, from hurricane Maria.

I`m joined right now by Connecticut Democratic senator Richard Blumenthal,
Christine Todd Whitman, former New Jersey governor and EPA administrator
under President Bush, Barbara Boxer, former California Democratic senator
and Sam Stein, politics editor for “the Daily Beast.”

Thank you all.

I want to start with Senator Blumenthal. What is he holding? Something is
holding this guy up, the President. He has been playing this for days now.
I`m going to do it. I`m going to pull the trigger. I`m going to this. We
are going to go. We are going to fight with the courts. I`m going to do
this by emergency action. What`s stopping him?

SEN. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL (D), CONNECTICUT: First and foremost, he is
encountering resistance within his own party. Most recently today senator
Grassley a very powerful and well respected member of the Senate leadership
has said that he would oppose use of this kind of military disaster-related

We have been hearing for years, Chris, about the real emergency in military
readiness that this country faces. And we have increased funding for
military on a bipartisan basis to meet that real emergency.

Now the President is talking about taking military funding, as well as
disaster related funding and exacerbating a real emergency to deal with
this manufactured emergency a product of his own actions at the border.
And there is a crisis there. It is a humanitarian crisis, not a security
crisis. The levels of apprehension are one-fifth of what they were in the
year 2000. Crime is its lowest rate in McAllen, Texas where the President
visited yesterday. But we face a need to continue military construction,
to make our bases safer. We face a need to deal with the forest fires and
emergency relief for Puerto Rico and Texas and Florida for their natural

The President is talking about defying the law, breaking constitutional
norms and principles. And the American people are seeing through it. And
I think he is feeling the pressure within his own party, from advisors in
his own White House who see the facts and the law as against him.

MATTHEWS: Speaking of the Mexico border, has your colleague, Lindsey
Graham, been chewing on the local weed or what? What is going on with this
guy? He plays golf with them. And now he - all of a sudden, he is
starting to go out. He was with them on Kavanaugh in a crazy way. Why is
this guy so totally whatever he is doing with Trump? I don`t want to get
weirdness of it, but why is he so well to Trump now? He used to be an
independent operator - Lindsey Graham. What happened?

BLUMENTHAL: He has been for many years that I have known him a thoughtful
and insightful and rational legislator and a friend. And I`m mystified by
much of what he has to say today.

But I think Lindsey Graham, the lawyer, will see that the constitutional
norms and the statute here would plainly be violated and court should see
through the political pandering and posturing and even the delay, which
defeats the idea that we have an emergency. If there`s an emergency, it
would be immediate, sudden, dangerous, serious.

There`s no factual justification for it. And I think Lindsey Graham will
eventually come to see that there`s no factual and legal basis here for
this kind of action and a court would and should see through it.

MATTHEWS: Well, speaking of the earth-while reasonableness of the
Republican Party, let me – get former governor Christy Todd Whitman of New

You were head of the EPA. You know what it means to run a federal agency.
What is the cause of this in the country, the fact that these people are
some showing up for work, some not, some not getting paid for showing for
work. And by the way there`s seven Republicans in the House today who
voted to not pay them even if they had been showing up to work. In other
words, don`t even pay the pay you owe them. Your thoughts, governor?

me. And there`s still a question of those who were furloughed, whether
they will get everything back. And the ones who have been working part
time are being paid part-time working full time, they are guaranteed to get
their money back. But the ones whose are furloughed, it`s going to take
con Congressional action and the President to sign a bill and he certainly
doesn`t seem to care much about them right now.

So it is a really dangerous situation. If we had an emergency, as senator
Blumenthal was saying, if this is a crisis, I agree, it`s a humanitarian
crisis. But if it is a crisis of all these rapists, murderers, terrible
people coming across the border, building a wall is going to take decades.
It is not going to happen overnight. So what are we doing in between?

It`s time to gets to the 21st century with border security. We all want
it. Nobody has said they don`t want it. And let`s not forget there was a
bill passed by both Houses, bipartisan bill that would have addressed this
issue. And based on what the President had told them he would accept and
then all the sudden he changed his mind and said no, (INAUDIBLE). So I
understand why it`s so hard to do a deal.

MATTHEWS: – for Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter.

WHITMAN: It`s amazing to me. It`s amazing to me because it`s very hard to
do a deal with this man.

MATTHEWS: Well, as President Trump has weighed declaring a national
emergency, some of his Republican allies on Capitol Hill have warned of the


SEN. CHUCK GRASSLEY (R), IOWA: I don`t think he should do that. I think
it`s a bad precedent and it contravenes the power of the purse that comes
from the elect representatives of the people.

SEN. MARCO RUBIO (R), FLORIDA: And today, the national emergency is border
security and entitles him to go out and do something. We all support that.
Tomorrow, the national security emergency might be, you know, climate
change. So let`s seize fossil fuel plants or something. I mean, it is an
exaggeration. But my point is we have to be careful about endorsing broad
uses of executive power.


MATTHEWS: And here is a really hideous comment. One of the President`s
chief defenders in the House of Representatives, Florida congressman Matt
Gaetz told the “Wall Street Journal,” now you will not believe what his
guys said.

Quote “I don`t want the next national emergency to be some Democrat
President says we have to build transgender bathrooms in every elementary
school in America.”

Talk about a reach. The stick at the transgender people. What a reach.

Senator Boxer, thank you. It`s great to have you back. I mean, government
hasn`t been so smooth since you left, by the way.


MATTHEWS: So what do you make of this? I said the other night it`s like
the McLachlan group only it is the government. I mean, what do you make of
this? I mean, this crazy guy talking about transgender has nothing to do
with the border. He is sticking it to those folks. And now this President
keeps threatening I`m going to drop the bomb. I`m going to, you know, go
to emergency declaration and national emergency and then he seems to even
he getting nervous. Something is going on.

BOXER: Well, if I could say there`s so much hate in people`s hearts. And
when you hear someone say that, like that congressman, just hurting people
gratuitously. And it all comes from the top. It comes from Donald Trump
who has anger and hate all over himself.

And here`s the thing. Chris, you and I go way back to when you worked for
Tip O`Neal. I hate to say that was the `80s. And this is one budget item,
OK, a wall. Out of tens of thousands of budget items. And the way to fix
it, first of all, spend the money you already have to build the barrier.
I`m sure speaker Pelosi will tell you in the House when you put forward
your new budget, which is coming due soon, let us know why you think the
wall is the best thing to do.

The fact of the matter is I voted for the secure fence act way back in
2006. That was a time when it made sense to build the barriers. But now
we have new technologies. Better ways to secure the border. There`s no
argument over the need do it. Do it in regular order. I`m sure she would
say she would hearings. You can bring your experts. They will bring their
experts. And we will get this thing done.

Right now there`s one emergency. And that is you had 800,000 hardworking
Americans suffering, thousands of contractors. This thing is a nightmare
because he couldn`t, the President, fulfill his pledge to have Mexico build
a wall, period. That`s it.

MATTHEWS: Let me get back to senator Blumenthal.

You served with these other - these Republicans. They are in your room
with that chamber once in a while. They are in the cloak room. Maybe not
your cloak but you knew where they are. And you all pass them in the
hallway. Are they happy with a government shut down for three weeks now?

BLUMENTHAL: They are disastrously unhappy. They are hearing from the same
people all of us see and hear who are experiencing real pain in real lives,
not just the federal workers who are going without pay and they were living
paycheck to paycheck. Now they have no paycheck. But rippling through our

I spent this morning with some of the craft brewers in Connecticut whose
business has been stymied by the shutdown because they can`t get permits
and approvals they need for labels. This ripple effect through our economy
is creating havoc. And the President, I think, has to heed members of this
own party who are expressing that disquiet about a vanity project and a
pause line that really is not the way to border security.

Absolutely are right. We are all in favor of using border security by
using better technology and more personnel. It is the way the Israelis do
it on their border. And I think he needs to heed those members of his own
party who have been telling me whether it`s at lunch or breakfast or in the
jam or wherever we gather how they are feeling growing anxiety about where
the country is going.

MATTHEWS: Sam, what is the straw this is going to break the behind his
back? When is this going to break? Are we just going to go for weeks now
without a government?

One is he does the emergency order. One is a real-life event causes some
sort of calamity that propels –

MATTHEWS: Not a plane crash?

STEIN: Well, you were getting to the point where TSA is obviously working
without pay. There is notable long lines in airports. Terminals being
shut down.

MATTHEWS: Traffics gets always under stress.

STEIN: But the third one and I guess I`m surprised that senator Blumenthal
didn`t focus on this. And honestly, that this conversation hasn`t touch
with it is that Mitch McConnell, he is an important operator in this saga.
At any point in time, he could bring a bill to the floor, allow it to go to
the President, ask the President to veto it and then override the veto. It
is theoretically possible that they will vote to that because we know it.

They voted on the CR to keep the government open prior to leaving for the
New Year in the (INAUDIBLE). So the votes are potentially there in the
Senate to just circumvent the President. But very little pressure has been
applied to Mitch McConnell. The preponderance of pressure has been applied
to Donald Trump.

MATTHEWS: Governor Whitman, Britain had Albert Cromwell (ph) and France
had Napoleon and Germany had Hender (ph) and Italy had Mussolini and Spain
had Franco (ph). Is this is a period in which the Republican Party will
somehow survived or is the future of your party, what we are watching right

WHITMAN: Well, I think if they don`t make major changes and finally get
backbone and stand up to him and say look, if there`s a crisis, if you want
to make us safer – the federal courts run out of money on the 18th of
January. They are going to start furloughing people on the 21st of
January. That is our court system. They not hearing cases. As was
mentioned, you have got TSA operators who are “getting sick,” quote-

I mean, I can`t blame them. If they are not getting paid and they have to
work full time, they are not showing up. You got long lines. You don`t
have the FBI doing all the work that they want to do. That is the crisis
that is being created here.

And I don`t know what it will take to get Republicans to finally say enough
with it. We have got so focused. Everything is about partisan politics
and not about policy that we just have to get over it. That is why, you
know, what I would love to see in the 2020 is a bipartisan ticket.
Republican-Democrat, Democrat-Republican. Something that means that
everybody has to get together and start to work together.

We can`t go on like this. And the people said that with Donald Trump`s
election but they didn`t get what they thought they were going to get.

MATTHEWS: By the way, I`m looking for comparison of our president, I
forget Hanapol (ph).

Anyway, the President -.

Richard Blumenthal, senator, thank you so much.

Christine Todd Whitman, thank you.

Former senator Barbara Boxer, I remember you sitting on your couch as a
young woman saying I`m running for Senate. I never forgot that moment.
Thank you.

And Sam Stein, thank you.

Coming up prosecutors are looking into whether foreign money was funneling
in the President Trump`s inauguration. There may be a Manafort connection.
Don`t you think? In fact, there was.

Plus, life imitates art. A 1958 TV series on CBS was making a splash as it
featured a character named Trump who wanted to build a wall. The guy was
an outlaw and a chameleon, of course. Anyway, a Charlotte.

Anyway, late tonight, a new contender jumped in race for the Democratic
presidential nomination that feels about to get much more crowded.

Finally, let me finish that with my predictions for the upcoming battle for
2020. You will find it fascinating and it may well be true.

This is HARDBALL where the action is.


MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.

While prosecutors work to untangle the web of connections between the Trump
campaign and Russia, there remains the question of how much foreign money
was funneled into Trump`s inauguration in January of 2017. That`s two
years ago.

“The New York Times” reports that among the guests at the ceremony and the
inaugural ball itself, there at least a dozen Ukrainian political and
business figures, some of whom were promoting grand bargains or peace plans
that aligned with Russia`s interests, including by lifting those sanctions.

Prosecutors want to know how those pro-Russian Ukrainians got into the
inaugural ball, who they spoke to there and whether they made any
contributions to Trump or to the ball itself.

However, there`s another dimension to this story. We learned this week
that, during the 2016 election, Paul Manafort not only shared polling data
with a Russian intelligence operative, but he directed that operative to
pass the data to two Ukrainian oligarchs.

And now “The New York Times” is connecting the dots, revealing that one of
those oligarchs who sent the polling data, who was sent it, attended the
Liberty Ball at Trump`s inauguration. He was at the inaugural ball.
That`s according to one person familiar with the guest list and another who
saw him there.

I`m joined right now by Paul Butler, a former federal prosecutor, and David
Corn, Washington bureau chief of “Mother Jones.”

Does this fit in to your thinking and all your investigative reporting on
this about the Russian connection?

DAVID CORN, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Well, we need a whiteboard.

And I was talking with Paul earlier about how you would present this to a
jury. Remember, the guy at the center of all this, Paul Manafort.
Manafort had a business partner, Konstantin Kilimnik, who is a Ukrainian
who worked in Russia who had ties, according to Mueller, to Russian

During the campaign, Manafort used Kilimnik to be in touch with a Russian
oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, very close to Putin, and now we have discovered
with two Ukrainian oligarchs who politically are associated with pro-Russia
policies in the Ukraine.

MATTHEWS: They`re all quislings, right?

CORN: They`re all trying to get…


MATTHEWS: They`re quislings. They`re guys who were betraying their
country in the interest of Russia.

CORN: Well, I`m not sure if they were becoming Russia or Ukraine.

But they are trying to get their mitts into the Trump administration.
Manafort is trying to use his leverage inside the Trump organization to
make good deals with these guys. And what is this doing prior to the

Manafort is sending a signal to Russian oligarchs and Putin-friendly
oligarchs that he and the Trump camp, they want a deal. They want – Trump
wants to deal with Putin, wants to deal with Russia. If Russia is was
going to attack the election to help Trump, that`s all good for them.

And then you come to the inauguration, and they`re funneling money in
through pass-throughs. And one thing that we reported at “Mother Jones”
months ago, a cousin of a Russian oligarch who never made a big donation
before gives a quarter of a million dollars, an American cousin, to the
Trump inauguration.

This is a slush fund. It`s just one of 27 different Trump scandals that we
could spend the whole show on, Chris.

MATTHEWS: I am not anti-Russian, Paul, but I have spent my life in
politics in this city and around the world, and I have never bumped into
more than a handful of Russians.


MATTHEWS: It`s not a big part of my life.

These guys, 101 contacts with Russians during the campaign with Trump


I think what Robert Mueller is interested in is, first of all, the
inauguration costs $107 million. That`s twice as much as Obama, the most
in history. Where did the money go?

I watched part of the inauguration on TV. It was lovely, but it didn`t
look like $107 million worth of lovely. And so he`s following the money.

The law is that they have to report who gives them the money.

MATTHEWS: You think the money passed through the inaugural ball to the
Trump people?

BUTLER: Well, the question is – we don`t know, because, under the law,
they just have to report where they get it from, but they don`t have to
report where it goes.

And the other question, to David`s point, is, why is Paul Manafort, the
campaign manager, reaching out to Ukrainian oligarchs with polling data?
Well, why would a campaign manager give billionaires information about the
campaign? Obviously, because he knows that they want to help Donald Trump
get elected, and he thinks that they can do it.

So I don`t know, he doesn`t know if they funneled this money to Russian
intel – funneled this data to Russian intelligence operatives. But what
we do know, reportedly, is that the Russians intelligence were very
involved in states like Wisconsin and Michigan, where Trump wasn`t expected
to win, but he did.

So maybe they came to the inauguration, these Ukrainian oligarchs, to
collect, to collect the debt that Trump owed them, because they helped him
get elected president.

MATTHEWS: Well, the president, President Trump, yesterday denied having
any knowledge of Manafort`s activity.


QUESTION: Mr. President, did you know – did you know that Paul Manafort
was sharing polling data from your campaign with the Russians?

about it. Nothing about it.


MATTHEWS: Let me ask you about the – Paul was getting to it.

When you share poll data, it could be for one of two – macro reason, we`re
winning. We can win this baby, so keep helping us. The other one is
inside information how to move a state.

Is that what we understand it to be?

CORN: Well, we don`t know. We don`t know exactly what the data was.

MATTHEWS: Because we know they were playing around with the African-
American vote. They were trying to get them turned off to Hillary.


CORN: We know they were doing a lot of data things.

And we know that the Russians and the Internet Research Agency are
targeting different aspects of the American electorate. So far, I don`t
see any tremendously sophisticated operation coming out of the Russian side
that could only happen with insider information.

Manafort could have been doing this…

MATTHEWS: So, they had spotters?

CORN: Manafort could have been doing this to make his own connections, or
to say, as you said earlier, that, we`re winning.

But I think, basically, he`s making connections with these guys to go both
ways. We can work with you afterwards. And he`s giving the Russians –
this is a key point that people don`t get. He`s giving the Russians
incentive to attack the campaign. He`s – the election. He`s telling
them, we want to work with you.

And so that`s all the more reason for them to intervene and meddle and try
to affect things to help Trump.

BUTLER: So these are pro-Russian Ukrainians. They come to the
inauguration. Mueller`s interested in whether they were illegally

And what do we know? We know that they were getting what they wanted from
Trump. So, right after that automation, Trump says, let`s lift the


BUTLER: He goes to the State Department. He goes to Republican
congresspeople on the Hill. They say, hell no, that`s crazy. That`s a 360
degree turn.

And so he abandons it, but he did what the Ukrainians, what the pro-Russian
Ukrainians wanted him to do.

MATTHEWS: Meanwhile, Flynn denies they were talking sanctions.

Anyway, meanwhile, as “The Washington Post” reported this week, there`s a
chance that, even after Mueller completes his big investigation, the White
House could effectively suppress portions of that report.

Now, according to the “Hill” newspaper, Rudy Giuliani`s going a step
further, saying, Trump`s legal team – this is a quote from him – “should
be allowed to correct special counsel Robert Mueller`s final report before
Congress or the American people even get a chance to look at it.”

Giuliani told “The Hill” that: “As a matter of fairness, they should show
it to them, so we can correct it if they`re wrong. They`re not God, after
all. They could be wrong.”

I mean, this is ludicrous.


MATTHEWS: I have never heard of a guy going into court and saying, let me
hear all your evidence. Let me hear…

BUTLER: So, legally, Giuliani doesn`t have a leg to stand on, as usual.

MATTHEWS: He`s not an official government official anyway.

BUTLER: Yes, so I wouldn`t be surprised if…

MATTHEWS: Why is he talking about executive privilege anyway? He`s not
even working for the government.

BUTLER: And he knows nothing about it.

I wouldn`t be surprised if Mueller lets him see the investigation report a
couple of days before, so he can make any kind of executive privilege
claims that he wants. But he`s not going to be able to change the report.

And if he tries, and if Attorney General Whitaker or Barr lets him, because
we know they`re hostile to the Russia investigation, we are protected by
two ways, one, Speaker Pelosi. She can haul Mueller into court and ask
him, did they make any changes? What were the change?

MATTHEWS: Oh, good.


And under the law…

MATTHEWS: That`s transparent.

CORN: But there`s one – there`s one big point. And that is, we have no
idea what this report will be.

Mueller is not like an independent counsel in days past. He has no
obligation under Justice Department guidelines to produce a report telling
everyone everything he found. There`s one line in the regs. It says, you
have to – he has to give report to the attorney general explaining his
prosecutorial decisions.

Now, one can envision him doing that in three pages. Here are the eight
cases I prosecuted and why, or doing it in 5,000 pages. Here`s everything
I looked at and why I prosecuted here at didn`t prosecute there.

We have no clue which way he`s going.

MATTHEWS: Why is that important? Why is that distinction important? Why
do – we want to know what the president can be proven to have done wrong.

CORN: Because people are looking at Mueller as the guy who`s going to give
us the bottom-line truth about what happened.

Not his job. His job is what Paul used to do. He`s a prosecutor. He
tries to find crime and make cases. It`s really up to Congress or an
independent commission to give us the full truth. He may try to do this
somehow. And there may be a fight about what happens if he goes expansive
on the report.

But there`s no guarantee that that…


MATTHEWS: OK. Well, I`m a big believer that that is what prosecutors
should do. They should indict or shut up.

CORN: Oh, yes.


BUTLER: And I had some good cases, but this is the most consequential
investigation of a politician in our history.

And so there`s no way that Mueller can just say, OK, I`m not going to
charge the president, see you later. He`s got to have a full report that
explains to the American people what we already know, that the Russians
tried to subvert our democracy and steal the election, and exactly how the
Trump campaign was involved in that effort.

MATTHEWS: Well, he can indict and let the courts decide if it works, can`t

CORN: That`s another way to go.

MATTHEWS: That`s one clear way to go. They will be found out that way.

Anyway, thank you, Paul Butler. Thank you, David Corn.

Up next: A con man named Trump – yes – convinces a bunch of people to
build a wall to keep out an imaginary threat. It`s an uncanny case of
history imitating art. And we`re going to explain it to you. You will not
believe what you watch coming up. It`s all crazy. But you`re going to
love it.

Don`t go anywhere. Hang on to watch this old cowboy show, which is exactly
a predictor of the hell we`re in right now.




ROBERT CULP, ACTOR: He says the world is going to come to an end?


CULP: Where is he from?

UNIDENTIFIED ACTRESS: Drove in this morning, wagon out front.

CULP: Mm-hmm. Got a name?


CULP: I bet it fits.


MATTHEWS: Well, as they used to say in the old days, don`t adjust your

That was a clip from a 1958 TV show called “Trackdown” – yes, 1958. It
bears eerie parallels with the current state of affairs here in D.C.

CBS News archives has the episode airing on May 9 of that year, 1958.

In this episode, Walter Trump – that is his name, Trump – rides into a
Texas town, selling himself as the only person who can save the town from
total destruction.


UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: I bring you a message, a message few of you will be
able to believe, a message of great importance, a message I alone was able
to read in the fires of the universe.

But be not afraid, my friends. I also bring you the means with which to
save yourselves.


MATTHEWS: Well, President Trump has use similar language, of course.


TRUMP: Nobody knows the system better than me, which is why I alone can
fix it.



MATTHEWS: Well, Trump, the charlatan from that `58 show, sells the idea of
a wall, a wall, to a captive audience of townsfolk afraid of death and
destruction brought on by a meteor shower.


UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: I am the only one, just me. I can build a wall around
your homes that nothing will penetrate.

UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: What do we do? How do we save ourselves?

UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: You ask, how do you build that wall? You asked, and
I`m here to tell you.

This is your savior.


MATTHEWS: Sound familiar?


MATTHEWS: Anyway, faced by a skeptical Texas Ranger, Trump pushes back.


TRUMP: This is common sense. They need a barrier. They need a wall. If
you don`t have it, it`s going to be nothing but hard work and grueling
problems – and, by the way, and death, and death, a lot of death.


MATTHEWS: And here`s our President Donald Trump.

I think we already showed that. Let`s go. Here`s our president. OK, we
have already shown you. We showed the comparison between – faced by a
skeptical Texas Ranger, Trump pushes back


UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: All right, Sheriff, how long you going to put up with

CULP: What do you mean?

UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: How long you going to let this con man walk around

UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: Be careful, son. I can sue you.


MATTHEWS: Well, near the end of the episode, Walter Trump also makes it
out of Dodge, except for that one upstanding and stoic lawman played by
Robert Culp, who stands in his way.


CULP: I think you ought to wait.

UNIDENTIFIED ACTOR: That`s where you and I disagree.

CULP: You`re under arrest, Trump.


CULP: Well, you write it any way you like, grand theft, fraud. I think a
jury will fight it`s stealing.



MATTHEWS: Well, no comment on that from Robert Mueller.

Up next: the latest on a crowded field of potential 2020 presidential
candidates. Who is inching closer to a run now, and who`s already pedal to
the metal? And what issues will they be focusing on as they try to win
over voters?

You`re watching HARDBALL.



JOE SCARBOROUGH, “MORNING JOE”: First question is, there`s been an awful
lot of talk about you running for president. How close are you to making
that decision?

SEN. KAMALA HARRIS (D), CALIFORNIA: I will make it soon.


HARRIS: I`m going to announce it today, obviously.


MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.

That was Democratic Senator Kamala Harris in California this morning
continuing to keep us all somewhat in the dark about her plans to run in

But the California senator who has been on a media tour lately to promote
her new books did answer why she would want to – want to be president.


HARRIS: I believe our country wants and needs leadership that provides a
vision of the future of our country in which everyone can see themselves,
in which everyone can see themselves.


MATTHEWS: Well, Harris is one of a crowded field of Democrats mulling over
the decision to run for the party`s nomination.

And today, another potential candidate, U.S. Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard of
Hawaii, announced she is getting into the race. Here she is.


REP. TULSI GABBARD (D), HAWAII: I have decided to run, and will be making
a formula announcement within the next week.


MATTHEWS: Well, two other senators, Kirsten Gillibrand of New York and
Sherrod Brown of Ohio, are planning trips to Iowa in the coming weeks.

And former U.S. Congressman Beto O`Rourke of Texas is receiving some late-
night laughs for his recent social media post while getting his teeth


didn`t understand what his adviser meant when he said, all the kids are


NOAH: Because like, what`s next, Ted Cruz checking his beard for lice on
TikTok? Come on, man.

But this is a genius way to avoid tough questions, right, because it would
be like, Congressman, how – how can you call yourself a progressive
candidate when you voted for drilling in the Gulf of Mexico?

He will be like, great question.



MATTHEWS: For more, I`m joined by the HARDBALL Roundtable tonight, Susan
Page, Washington bureau chief for “USA Today,” Adrienne Elrod, former
director of strategic communications Hillary for America, and, as of today,
this very day, an MSNBC contributor.


And Shermichael Singleton, a Republican political consultant.

So, give us a sense, Susan. You have to do the front page for “USA Today.”
So how`s the race look in terms of participation right now? How many
people are running?

for the first time in history, we`re going to have more candidates than we
have fingers and toes.


That would be more than 20.

PAGE: More than 20.

And I think the previous record is 17 of kind of credible candidates. But
you can count two dozen credible Democratic candidates. And it`s hard to
see any of them not running. There`s no – there`s no sense of question
about whether Kamala Harris is running. She is running.

MATTHEWS: No question.

Let me ask you, Adrienne.

It seems to be, no matter what we say now about equality of opportunity,
there`s going to be polls.


MATTHEWS: And there will be a poll some time in April or May that`s going
to tell us what this race, this field looks like, right?

ELROD: Yes, of course.

MATTHEWS: And there`s only going to be four or five people that really
have getting anywhere near double digits.

ELROD: That`s right. But I think you`re going to see Democratic voters
flirt with a bunch of different candidates.

And I think you`re going to see the tier one candidates stay for the most
part tier one. But I think you`re going to see a couple tier two
candidates move into the tier one space.

MATTHEWS: Like who?

ELROD: Well, I think Terry McAuliffe, who I would consider to be a tier
two candidate. I think he could viably move into a tier one space.

And we will see who else.

MATTHEWS: Is there a moderate aisle, a rail, is there a lane for a
moderate and a lane for the progressive left?

ELROD: Absolutely, there is.

MATTHEWS: Two different lanes?

ELROD: There is.

And I think that`s an important thing that you just pointed out, Chris,
because Terry McAuliffe wrote an op-ed a couple days ago in “The Washington
Post” where he really was catering to the middle of the party.

Some people are going to have to get votes from the moderate wing of the
party. Not everybody can vie for the left wing of the party, the
progressive wing of the party.

MATTHEWS: Because there`s too many people doing it.

ELROD: Because there`s a lot of people doing it.


ELROD: And this is going to be one of those primaries, Chris, where 6 or 7
percent of the electorate supporting you could be a very big chunk of the -
- of what primary voters are – who they`re supporting.

MATTHEWS: Shermichael, you`re in this business. Apparently, there`s only
a few people that can run national campaigns. And these people are
announcing fairly soon because they`re grabbing those top talent.

top talent. They`re also going to be grabbing donors. It`s extremely
expensive. It`s a very complicated process.

And I think Democrats have to be very, very careful, though, because each
of those candidates are going to have to figure out some kind of way to
distinguish themselves from the next person. Remember when Republicans had
17 candidates. We had two different debates.

I mean, how do you have a debate stage with 22 different candidates? So
while I think this is good to give people an opportunity to see who they
want to ultimately choose, I think it can be a complicated process that may
ultimately hurt some viable or some good candidates in the long run.

MATTHEWS: Well, meanwhile, President Trump remains adamant that he may
still declare a national emergency over his demand for border wall, and
that he has every right to do so, absolute right, he keeps saying. Here he


TRUMP: The law is very clear. I mean, we have the absolute right to
declare a national emergency.

And this is security stuff. This is a national emergency, if you look at
what`s happening.


MATTHEWS: Well, some Republicans out there are saying it would be a


SEN. CHARLES GRASSLEY (R), IOWA: I don`t think he should do that. I think
it`s a bad precedent. And it contravenes the power of the purse that comes
from the elected representatives of the people.

SEN. LISA MURKOWSKI (R), ALASKA: We are going down a road that I think
erodes those clear lines of authorities between the three separate, but
equal branches of government.

powerful than winning this fight.

SEN. MITT ROMNEY (R), UTAH: I don`t want to see a declaration of national
emergency. I think that`s an action that would be taken in the most
extreme circumstances.


MATTHEWS: Don`t you sense there`s a usual suspects list now, if you`re a
reporter, if you want somebody to take a shot at Trump?

PAGE: Yes, although field has gotten a little larger than it used to be of
people who are willing to distance themselves from Trump, or say to
President Trump…

MATTHEWS: Republicans, yes.

PAGE: Of Republicans saying, don`t do that.

I mean, I think the Republican fear is, if you let Trump do this now and
support him, what are you going to do when you have got a Democratic
president who wants to say climate change is a national…


MATTHEWS: What about that clown down in Florida that says, the next thing
they do, the Democrats will be doing something on transgender bathrooms or

I mean, what a reach.

ELROD: I mean, I don`t know. What do you want me to say on that, Chris?


MATTHEWS: I don`t know if there`s anything to say about the guy. He`s a

ELROD: Look, but I think what – going back to what Susan just said, you
are seeing a more expansive group of Republicans who are willing to
criticize Donald Trump.

The fact that Newt Gingrich went on FOX News and said, I don`t think he
should declare a national emergency on this – Chuck Grassley, who has been
one of his strongest allies.

These guys don`t want this to – they don`t want to own this. They don`t
want to own this – this problem. And it will become a problem. But
someone is telling Trump not to do this too who he listens to.

MATTHEWS: Jared Kushner.

ELROD: Maybe it`s Jared Kushner.

MATTHEWS: Shermichael.

SINGLETON: Well, Chris, I mean, look, I think it shows just how
disconnected the president is from everyday people.

He doesn`t care about struggling people who live paycheck to paycheck. I
was reading reports earlier today of one example of a federal worker who`s
selling her car to pay her mortgage. What about federal workers who can`t
afford to put gas in their car or pay their rent?

I mean, what do you tell your – you`re a homeowner – or the bank? What
do you tell the person who owns – your landlord who owns the apartment
complex? I will pay you next month? I mean, that doesn`t work for people
who are living in the real world. And it just goes to show you just how
horrific this presidency has become.

And I think Donald Trump has honestly cemented himself as probably the
worst president in American history.

MATTHEWS: Well, that`s a quote.


MATTHEWS: Thank you.

Finally, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo delivered what was billed a major
foreign policy speech that was supposed to lay out the Trump
administration`s vision for the Mideast.

Instead, what Secretary Pompeo did was repudiate Barack Obama`s foreign
policy. Let`s listen.


MIKE POMPEO, U.S. SECRETARY OF STATE: What do we learn from all of this?
We learn that when America retreats, chaos often follows, and when we
neglect our friends, resentment builds. And when we partner with our
enemies, they advance.

The good news – the good news is this. The age of self-inflicted American
shame is over.


MATTHEWS: However, in that same speech, Pompeo announced the Trump
administration`s own retreat of American forces from Syria, against allies`
wishes, of course, while praising Saudi Arabia, whose government has been
implicated in the murder and dismemberment, of course, of a journalist,
Jamal Khashoggi.


POMPEO: President Trump has made the decision to bring our troops home
from Syria. We always do. And now is the time.

Saudi Arabia and Gulf countries have generously contributed towards
stabilization efforts. Saudi Arabia too has worked with us to counter
Iranian expansion and regional influence.


MATTHEWS: So what`s the Trump doctrine for the Mideast?

PAGE: Well, it`s, don`t worry about human rights. It that`s you can
murder a journalist who works for an American news organization, and
apparently pay no price with this administration.

MATTHEWS: Well, the Roundtable is going to stick with us.

And up next day, these three will Tell Me Something I Don`t Know.

You`re watching HARDBALL.


MATTHEWS: We`re back with the HARDBALL Roundtable.

Susan, Tell Me Something I Don`t Know.


You know, the Senate race Republicans are worried about for 2020 is in
Kansas, which has not elected a Republican – a Democratic senator since
1932. And the one they`re trying to recruit to run, the GOP, Mike Pompeo.

MATTHEWS: Yes, I hear, the secretary of state.

PAGE: Yes, and the former Kansas congressman.


ELROD: Fascinating.

MATTHEWS: Adrienne.

ELROD: We have been talking a little bit about the DNC debate process
tonight. How are we going to handle this with 20-something – potentially
up to 20 candidates running?

The DNC has administered guidelines. They will be continuing to administer
further guidelines on how the debate process will take place. And that`s
also going to include grassroots fund-raising and polling to determine who
gets into the debate.

MATTHEWS: Who gets in. They`re no longer looking at polls?

ELROD: Well, it will be grassroots fund-raising, and polling will be a
factor as well.


SINGLETON: We have talked a lot about the economy. The economy is slowing
down, particularly the housing market.

Michael Bright, who is the president of Ginnie Mae, which issues mortgage-
backed bonds, abruptly resigned out of nowhere. So, it`s going to be very,
very intriguing to see how that could impact the housing market going
forward, potentially, as we think about the slowing of the economy overall.


Thank you very much, Susan Page. Thank you, Adrienne Elrod and Shermichael

When we return, Let Me Finish Tonight with my prediction for the upcoming
Democratic battle for 2020. Stick around.

You`re watching HARDBALL.


MATTHEWS: Let Me Finish tonight with a little fun. I think we can use it
tonight, this 20th night of the government shutdown, this 20th night of a
president slamming the door to his room, saying he won`t come out until he
gets his way.

So I`m going to stick my neck out and do what I love doing, making
predictions about politics.

I predict that this battle to take on Donald Trump in 2020 is going to
start strong, with Elizabeth Warren winning the Iowa caucuses and winning
again a week later in the New Hampshire primary. She will then be
challenged by Kamala Harris in the South Carolina primary, and on again
into Nevada and California on March 3.

Now, the big question is whether there`s a third candidate who can come in
third or even fourth in these early contests and still have the money and
political heft to challenge the two front-runners. Who is that person? Is
it Barack Obama`s vice president, Joe Biden? Is it former New York Mayor
Michael Bloomberg? Is it Beto O`Rourke?

In other words, will this fight to take on Trump he decided fast or over
time? Will it be an early win for a strong progressive, or will the
Democratic voters take their time?

And what makes this contest so vital, so valuable to American history is
that the 2020 election is so winnable for a Democrat, also so losable.

I can imagine every candidate now showing interest in the race beating
Trump. I can imagine every one of them losing to Trump. But the odds are
for the Democrats to win.

And that`s why this baby is going to be one of the great political contests
of our lives.

And that`s HARDBALL for now. Thanks for being with us.

“ALL IN WITH CHRIS HAYES” starts right now.


Copyright 2019 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are
protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the
prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter
or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the