Warren exit TRANSCRIPT: 3/5/20, All In w/ Chris Hayes
STEVE KORNACKI, MSNBC NATIONAL POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT: Democratic leader
said Bernie Sanders, if you nominate him could be a risk and they hit the
brakes, Democratic voters hit the brakes. Whether they let up or press down
harder, that`s what we`re going to find out. Thanks for being with us
tonight. Don`t go anywhere. “ALL IN” with Chris Hayes is up next.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
CHRIS HAYES, MSNBC HOST: Tonight on ALL IN.
SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN (D-MA): I will not be running for president in 2020.
HAYES: 2020 is now a two-man race.
SEN BERNIE SANDERS (D-VT), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: We have a shot to win
the Democratic nomination and a shot to beat Donald Trump.
JOE BIDEN (D), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: The President does not want me to be
HAYES: Tonight, where Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders stand and the legacy of
Elizabeth Warren`s candidacy.
SANDERS: All those little girls are going to have to wait four more years.
That`s going to be hard.
HAYES: Then the failure of the Trump administration on coronavirus as the
president It suggests it would be fine for people with the virus to go to
DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Some of them go to work, but
they get better.
HAYES: And new evidence that Jared Kushner made a tremendous amount of
money thanks to a policy he pushed in the White House.
TRUMP: He works for nothing, just so – you know, nobody ever reports that,
but he gets zero.
HAYES: When ALL IN starts right now.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
HAYES: Good evening from New York. I`m Chris Hayes. It is effectively a
two-man race the Democratic nomination. Earlier today, Senator Elizabeth
Warren announced she was suspending her campaign in an appearance outside
her home in Cambridge, Massachusetts. She declined to make an endorsement
the race but addressed why she thought she was not ultimately able to
resonate more with voters across the country.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
WARREN: You know, I was told at the beginning of this whole undertaking,
that there are two lanes, a progressive lane, that Bernie Sanders is the
incumbent for in a moderate lane that Joe Biden is the incumbent for, and
there was no room for anyone else in this. I thought that wasn`t right but
evidently, I was wrong.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
HAYES: I should tell you; Elizabeth Warren will be speaking to Rachel
Maddow in Boston just about an hour from now. You definitely want to catch
that. Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden are now really the only two options left
for Democrats. The Sanders campaign is trying to figure out how to reach
out to Warren to win her endorsement.
Bernie Sanders himself has been very complimentary tweeting today. “Without
her the progressive movement would not be nearly as strong as it is today.
I know that she`ll stay in this fight and we are grateful that she will.”
So as Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Sanders surrogate who
wrote, “Elizabeth Warren is a progressive lion, a champion for working
families, and her commitment to inclusivity is exemplary. Thank you for
being a role model.”
Obviously, the Sanders camp feels that a Warren endorsement would help
them. They`re probably right. Joe Biden tweeted, “Elizabeth Warren is the
fiercest of fighters for middle-class families. We needed her voice in this
race and we need her continued work in the Senate.” I should note that some
people interpreted that bid about the Senate as a signal that she would not
be on his V.P. list.
Biden and Sanders are preparing now for a bunch of important primaries in
just five days. Sanders` campaign announcing today they`re canceling a
speech in Mississippi which votes on Tuesday to focus on Michigan, a state
where Sanders did quite well last time. Last night, Bernie Sanders spoke to
Rachel Maddow about his campaign`s failure so far to turn out and mass the
youth vote that is so crucial to his electoral performance.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
RACHEL MADDOW, MSNBC HOST: Why are fewer young people turning out in 2020
with you on the ballot?
SANDERS: I mean, what I will tell you is that in Iowa, we tripled – we
increase by 33 percent the number of young people who are participating.
I`m not dealing with these statistics. I really haven`t seen them. But it
is no – look, this is the challenge that we have. We have the lowest voter
turnout of almost any major country on Earth, less than 60 percent. Poor
people in America by very big numbers do not vote.
How do we bring them into the political process? Why do they not vote? Why
are young people not voting? This is tough stuff. And you`re right. We are
trying to do that. I understand that it is easier to bring older people
who`ve been voting for their whole lives, but we are working really hard to
try to bring people out. I think in the general election, we will be
(END VIDEO CLIP)
HAYES: Joe Biden, on the other hand, continues to rack up endorsements from
the official Democratic Party consolidating behind him. The latest
endorsement is a key one, Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer, who in 2018
defeated a Sanders-backed candidate in that primary before winning the
general election by almost 10 points, and she joins me now.
Governor, why did you choose now to endorse Joe Biden who`s been in the
race for a year?
GOV. GRETCHEN WHITMER (D-MI): I`ve been watching the race like Americans
all over the country. I`ve been watching to see how this race played out.
There were some phenomenal, talented people on the stage at the beginning.
They – we`ve seen how this has changed.
And in this moment, people across my state are asking me what I`m going to
do. They want to know. And as I`ve looked at the race, I know that when the
chips were down, when Michigan needed a champion, it was Barack Obama and
Joe Biden that had our backs during the auto rescue.
I know that healthcare is personal for me and for so many people in my
state. We expanded Medicaid here to almost 700,000 people, and that was
because of the work that Barack Obama and Joe Biden did on the Affordable
Care Act. And so, this is personal. And I think that the hard work that Joe
Biden has put in over the years, the dedication to causes that resonate and
really impact and improve people`s lives in this state were reasons that I
thought this is now the time to tell people that I am voting for and
supporting Joe Biden.
HAYES: One of the arguments that was made in 2016 about that narrow loss by
Hillary Clinton in the state of Michigan, which was about 10,000 votes and
somewhat surprising, I think, was that a key issue in that race was trade.
That Donald Trump had come out against the TVP and NAFTA and he was
attacking Hillary Clinton on that. She, of course, had supported both those
People say, you know, Joe Biden has been sort of consistently a kind of
pro-trade deal legislator. Bernie Sanders has been opposed to them. Do you
worry about that? Do you think that`s going to matter in a general
WHITMER: Well, I do you think records matter. Of course. And everyone needs
to defend the record. But the fact of the matter is, you know, when the
chips were down, it was the Obama-Biden administration that came to the
defense of the auto industry. It saved our national economy, and certainly
was personal to so many Michiganders.
When we needed a champion who was going to turn their grief into a cause to
expand health care to people, that`s what we got out of the Obama-Biden
presidency and vice presidency. We know Joe and more importantly, Joe knows
Michigan. He`s been there when we needed him. And that`s exactly what we`re
looking for in leaders.
You know, the blueprint I use in 2018 was to show up. So state focused on
the dinner table issues, to talk about building bridges not walls, and to
ensure that we have a vision and we show up and get the work done. And
that`s exactly what Joe Biden is doing. That`s what he`s all about. That`s
why I think his record is going to resonate with Michiganders and across
Final question to you. You were one of a crop of Democratic women elected
in 2018 both across country and in your state of Michigan in several
extremely talented women in congressional races that won very hard-fought a
contest as long – as well as your race which you won by 10 points, a
fairly convincing victory.
What do you make of the fact that this race which started out with more
women in it on the Democratic side than any race in history is now bereft
of that, with the exception of Tulsi Gabbert who`s still running. Does it -
- how do you feel looking at that reality today?
WHITMER: Well, obviously as Elizabeth Warren`s statement today. And it`s
sad. You know, I really would love to see a woman president in my lifetime,
soon in my lifetime. And I think that Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris, Pete
Buttigieg, you know, Cory Booker brought some important voices, and
aspects, and perspective to the debate.
And that`s why I feel proud to be a part of you know, what the effort to
help Joe because I know that he will set a table where everyone has a seat.
He will build a coalition, and really, I think set an agenda that helps
improve the lives of Americans everywhere. I do want to see a woman
president in my lifetime, and I think the world of Elizabeth Warren. But at
this point, our focus is on what is going to, you know, what would be the
best interest for the people of our country and for the state of Michigan.
And I believe that Joe Biden offers the vision that we need right now.
HAYES: All right, Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer, thank you so much for
making time this evening. I really appreciate it.
WHITMER: Thank you.
HAYES: Joining me now for more on the state of the race, Nina Turner, co-
chair of the 2020 Bernie Sanders presidential campaign. Announcement today
from the Sanders campaign about not doing a speech in Mississippi and said
going to Michigan. Some people, I think, interpreting that as a kind of cut
your losses in parts of the south where Senator Sanders has struggled a
bit, particularly in Alabama and South Carolina. Is that a fair
interpretation? What would you say to that?
NINA TURNER, CO-CHAIR, BERNIE SANDERS 2020 CAMPAIGN: No, they shouldn`t see
it that way, Chris. I mean, we`re still going to have events there. We have
some of our national surrogates that are going to be there. Mr. Danny
Glover will be there. We have the mayor of Jackson, Mississippi, Mayor
Lumumba as you know, who was endorsed the senator. So there will be
activities going on this weekend in Mississippi, particularly in Jackson,
Mississippi. So no, they should not interpret it that way.
HAYES: There`s been reporting about the ways in which the Sanders campaign
is thinking about its message right now down the stretch. Now it is a two-
man race and there was an ad just cut was showing Senator Sanders with
President Obama, and Obama speaking very highly of him, and sense that some
of the message has to be changed a bit to bring in some voters that aren`t
yet in the Sanders coalition. You think that`s a fair assessment of where
TURNER: Our entire campaign has been about building coalitions and bringing
new people in. As you play the clip of the Senator interviewing with
Rachel, you know, he talks about that all the time ad nauseam in terms of
bringing new people in. What would help the Democratic Party be a vibrant
Democratic Party is really having a big 10 and bringing people in.
So you know, highlighting that even more and making it very clear, you
know, as other folks that even President Obama talked or spoke very highly
of Senator Bernie Sanders.
HAYES: There`s a lot of reporting today about Elizabeth Warren and the
possibility of an endorsement. Would you welcome an endorsement from
Senator Warren? Is that something that you`re actively seeking?
TURNER: Certainly, we welcome that. It is time for the progressives to
coalesce. It is my hope and the hope of many in this movement. You know,
even people who`ve supported Senator Warren, their hope too is that both
senators will come together. The moderates have certainly come together in
very strong fashion, and we do need the progressive wing of the party to
unite as well.
HAYES: What does morale like in your campaign? Obviously, it was a
whirlwind 72 hours. There was a week between Nevada and South Carolina
where Sanders was quite clearly the front runner. There was a question
about the viability of Joe Biden heading in South Carolina. Obviously, that
big win in – on Saturday in South Carolina turned things around. Super
Tuesday went fairly well, quite well for Joe Biden`s expectations. How do
you feel about where things stand right now?
TURNER: We feeling fine, you know, no matter what they throw at us. I mean,
Chris, they – all of the moderates, all of the establishment Dems had to
come together to make this happen. Senator Sanders has always been very
clear, our movement has been clear, that when you are trying very hard to
bend the body politic towards the will of the everyday people of this
nation, the status quo gets nervous. And that`s what we`re seeing.
So we are ever more determined. You know, we`re still continuing to
persists. We are excited about going into the next phase of this campaign.
As you know, Senator Bernie Sanders did win Michigan last time. You know,
you have the new governor on, Governor Whitmer. Senator Sanders endorsed
She asked him to come out and help her in the general knowing his position
on issues like Medicare for all even though he had backed Dr. Sayed –
Abdul Sayed, as you know, who is for single-payer, he still came out
because he knew it was important to defeat the Republican in that race, and
you know, trying to proceed or follow I should say, the governor who is –
who was responsible Governor Snyder, for the Flint water crisis.
Senator Sanders, Chris has been to Michigan many times. Not only did he
come into that state to talk to the people who are most impacted by the
Flint water crisis, he even came back after that. He stood up against trade
deals that hurt states like Michigan and also my home state of Ohio where
people lost countless jobs and are still reeling from that even to this
day. So Michiganders voted for Senator Sanders last time and we`re working
very hard to win that state again.
HAYES: All right, Nina Turner, thank you for making time tonight.
TURNER: Thanks, Chris.
HAYES: Joining me now for more on where we stand now and what Elizabeth
Warren`s exit means, Michelle Goldberg op-ed columnist for New York Times
and MSNBC Political Analyst and her husband, disclosure, works as an
advisor for the Warren campaign, although we don`t have that disclosed.
MICHELLE GOLDBERG, MSNBC POLITICAL ANALYST: Yes. I guess that`s the last
time we`re going to make that disclosure.
HAYES: Yes. It`s the last time we`re going to do that. What do you think? I
mean, I think it`s a gut punch. You know, it`s really heartbreaking. It`s
heartbreaking that this campaign started out with so much promise. There
was that picture going around today of you know, that early photograph of
all of those women who might become president to have it end up.
You know, I`ve had to over the course of this campaign explain to my
kindergarten daughter why there has never been a woman president and kind
of, you know – and she`s been incredulous, you know, because Elizabeth
Warren is who our family supports, has, you know, thought that Elizabeth
Warren was going to be the first one.
I think it is – it`s so – it`s extremely painful in part because of why
she lost. I mean, I think there`s people who oppose Elizabeth Warren on the
merits, for sure. You hear all over this country, you talk to people who
say, well, I would love to vote for her. I would love to support her. But I
don`t think the country is ready, right?
And so we`ve been so traumatized by Donald Trump`s election that you have
to deal with both sexism and the perception of other people`s sexism, and I
don`t see how you get beyond that. I feel like we were in some ways we`ve
been set back even further than we were in 2015 when the possibility of a
female president still seemed exciting and fresh.
HAYES: One thing that has been striking to me is that for all of the – if
you go back to when Joe Biden announced he was entering the race, and it
was unclear whether he would, basically this – it was Joe Biden, the
favorite with a strong number two from Bernie Sanders. And a lot of things
happened over the course of the last year.
HAYES: But yet, here we are. And in some ways, it`s like – it`s what
Warren said I thought quite astutely. She said, look, this is what people
told me. There`s – basically there`s a Biden lane, and there`s a Sanders
lane, and there`s no room between. And it`s remarkable the way that that
has ended up shaking out.
GOLDBERG: I think, you know, in Sanders – both Sanders and Biden
supporters have this – it`s not just that they support the candidate, they
also support the candidate`s theory of the electorate, right? Sanders`
supporters believe that there are all these people out there waiting to go
to the polls, if only they hear a progressive enough message. Joe Biden
supporters believe that he`s electable and then kind of ping pong around
You have all these people who just want to defeat Trump, right? You know,
the house is on fire and putting out the fire is so much more important
than what you`re going to build afterwards. So in a lot of ways, we`ve had
these debates that have been sort of recursive because we debate the kind
of finer points of these various health care problems. But what people are
evaluating is not so much how is this healthcare going to affect me, it`s
how are other people going to evaluate this health care plan, and will they
be electable afterwards.
HAYES: Or how will this person making the case for their health care plan
play in a debate against Donald Trump making the case for their health care
plan, as opposed to the health care plan?
GOLDBERG: Right. And so, you know – I mean, then you have – you have, you
know, a lot of black voters in South Carolina who want to vote for a
candidate who white voters will find acceptable. You have a lot of white
voters who are excited because all of a sudden Joe Biden has all of this
black support, right? Everybody just wants to find the person who can end
this you know, really hellish nightmare that we`re living through.
And what scares me, what scares me to death is that this process is not the
right way to find the person who is actually going to do that. I mean,
there`s almost a kind of Greek tragedy in it.
HAYES: Yes, there`s a fear deep in people that that is the case. Michelle
Goldberg, thank you very much.
GOLDBERG: Thank you.
HAYES: Up next, just how much is the Trump administration bungling the
coronavirus response. The man who spearheaded the response to the latest
Ebola outbreak joins me right here at this table next.
HAYES: The biggest failure of the Trump administration response to
coronavirus has been the lack of testing on the scale needed. They
announced this week with great fanfare, they`re going to have over a
million coronavirus tests available at the end of the week. And at that
time they announced that, it was obviously false.
Anyone who knows anything new that logistical obstacles were too big to get
there by the end of the week. And then today, guess what, senators
confirmed we aren`t going to be testing it anywhere near that scale.
Republican Rick Scott admitting there won`t be a million people to get a
test by the end of the week. It`s way smaller than that.
Now it`s defensible to not be scaling up to a million this week, but what
is not defensible is that the lack of testing we have means we do not know
how many cases there really are in the United States. Again, Centers for
Disease Control says that there are just 99 total cases in the country with
13 states reporting cases. NBC News has found the numbers are higher, at
least 226 cases at last count in 21 states.
And what has been clear from the beginning is the President of the United
States isn`t really primarily interested in dealing with the virus itself
as a first order problem. No, he is interested in spinning it to preserve
his political standing and the standing of the economy. And last night, he
was doing a doozy of it on Trump T.V.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We have for today the global death rate at 3.4 percent,
and a report that the Olympics could be delayed. Your reaction to that?
TRUMP: Well, I think the 3.4 percent is really a false number now, and this
is just my hunch. And – but based on a lot of conversations with a lot of
people that do this – because a lot of people will have this and it`s very
(END VIDEO CLIP)
HAYES: Now, there is a responsible way to communicate what the president
said, which is that the 3.4 percent mortality rate is not consistent across
all countries, which probably has to do with a lack of testing. In South
Korea where they`re doing a ton of testing more than anywhere else in the
world, the fatality rate there reportedly appears to be hovering around
0.65 percent, much better. That is hopefully what we will end up having
here. But you can`t just dismiss the World Health Organization figure based
on a hunch.
And then the president says something unbelievably revealing about people
who have the virus and don`t need intensive medical care.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
TRUMP: If you know, we have thousands or hundreds of thousands of people
that get better just by, you know, sitting around and even going to work,
some of them go to work, but they get better.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
HAYES: That`s the president blindly suggesting going to work with the
coronavirus which, listen to me, do not go to work with the coronavirus,
OK. Joining me now Ron Klain who served as the U.S. Ebola response
coordinator under President Obama. Testing continues to be a real problem
even after the announcement they were sending out these kits. How do you
assess overall, the responses administration so far?
RON KLAIN, EBOLA RESPONSE COORDINATOR UNDER PRESIDENT OBAMA: I mean, I
think you have to give you the response a pretty low grade. I think C-minus
or D-plus, whatever you want to put on it, for a couple of reasons, Chris.
They focused on travel restrictions to delay the arrival of the virus. And
we could talk about would that work or not, but what it bought was time.
That`s only a valid strategy if you use that time to ramp up.
So yeah, it was reasonable that on Monday when they said there`d be a
million tests by Friday, no one should believe that. But there should have
been a million tests way before Friday because we knew in December and
early January this was coming, and why did we start really just working on
this problem this week.
The same thing with hospital capacity, and all the other aspects of this,
the response is moving slowly, it`s starting late, and that`s inexcusable.
HAYES: The President had this – he talked about his sort of bragging about
the numbers today. There are two tweets. So in one tweet, he called you a
lightweight Washington failure and was mad about the swine flu and a lot of
people dying that. And then another, he said, look, we`ve only got 129
cases and 11 deaths, we are working very hard to keep these numbers as low
And it struck me that that was a very revealing sentence, we are working
very hard to keep these numbers as low as possible. It`s the numbers. But
if you`re not testing, that`s one way of keeping the numbers low.
KLAIN: Yes, I mean, it`s like a double entendre tweet, which is what
they`re doing to keep the numbers low is being slow about testing. And in
the end, you can`t hide sick people under the sofa, OK. We are going to
have to find these people, treat them, get them into the healthcare system,
get them well, isolate those cases the extent possible. And if you don`t
test you don`t know.
He is focused on numbers. He`s focused on the stock market being up and the
case count being down. Those are the two wrong things to focus on. You
should be focusing on getting people tested, surveillance, finding out
where this is, and getting hospitals ready to deal with the inflow of
HAYES: So, one thing I want to be clear on in our coverage of this is that
the idea that the individual risks when American is low is correct. There`s
330 million people in this country. Even if we were facing an equally sized
outbreak, which is large, you know, that would be, you know, 25,000 cases,
right there? They`ve got about 5,000 cases on 60 million people. So, again,
in the relative scheme of things, the risks though is to the healthcare
system. Explain why that is.
KLAIN: Well, first of all, I do think the risk of number of cases could be
a lot higher than that. They`re testing in Italy, but not testing in nearly
as much as they should be also. And so I don`t think we – I think the
fairest thing to say about the number of cases is we don`t know.
HAYES: We don`t know.
KLAIN: I mean, that`s – I think we should begin and end with that, OK.
Now, it`s going to be a number, a pretty big number in the end – and our
healthcare system is fragile, right? It runs at capacity. We don`t have
hospitals just sitting empty waiting for coronavirus patients to show up.
So if you put stress on that system by disorganized response by people in
particular city, whatever city it is, flooding into hospitals, flooding
into emergency rooms, that will one, really collapse the capacity of those
hospitals and emergency rooms.
It may infect doctors, nurses, and frontline healthcare workers. And those
things will take down part or a lot of a healthcare system in a particular
area. So even if you don`t get coronavirus, if you need to go to that
hospital to get treatment for a heart attack –
HAYES: Right. And there are no beds or no respirators.
KLAIN: – and there are no beds, or the nursing populations down a lot
because they`re sick or the doctors are out because they`re sick, that`s
going to have effect on all of us even if you never ever get coronavirus.
HAYES: How much was communication straightforward, honest, clear, fact-
based communication important to you when you were coordinating the Ebola
KLAIN: Look, it was very important. And ironically, that`s one reason why I
didn`t go on T.V. at all the first month of the Ebola response. We put Tony
Fauci on television, but Tom Friedman on television. The American people
should hear from experts, from the people who know the medicine, who have
been career officials who could – Tony Fauci served six U.S. presidents
back to Ronald Reagan. He fought AIDS, he fought malaria, followed by kinds
People should hear from him directly about the facts and the truth. He now
has to go in events with the president and correct the president when he
misleads people in real-time. He`s like a real-time fact-checking. That`s
not the way this should work.
HAYES: What is your hope that you see happen in this response you haven`t
KLAIN: So I think two things really have to be fixed. We have a problem
with competence, we have a problem of confidence and we need to fix both.
On competence, we need to ramp up the testing. There`s just no way around
that. And secondly, we need to get the touchpoints of our healthcare
system, the intake points ready for these cases so that we don`t collapse
healthcare system in particular areas, particular systems. That`s the
The confidence side, the president needs to put down the iPhone, needs to
stop saying ridiculous things on camera, and let public health authorities
brief people and tell us the truth.
HAYES: Final question. Has the White House or anyone in the White House
reached out to you for your expertise?
KLAIN: I haven`t talked to any senior people at the White House. I continue
to talk to career people throughout the government who worked with me on
Ebola response. You know, those career people, what Donald Trump disparages
as the deep state, are what`s going to protect us and save us in a
situation like this.
HAYES: All right, Ron Klain, thank you so much.
KLAIN: Thank you, Chris.
HAYES: Coming up, the plea from a nurse who`s now quarantined after
treating a patient with coronavirus in California and isn`t getting tested.
HAYES: As Coronavirus spreads in the United States, the nation`s testing
capabilities are not keeping pace. Tonight, the largest union of registered
nurses, National Nurses United, is raising alarms that members of their
union are being denied testing after potentially contracting Coronavirus
from infected patients. Joining me now is Bonnie Castillo, a registered
nurse, and executive director of National Nurses United.
And Ms. Castillo, you have a member who wrote a letter today, and I
wondered if you could give the context for that letter?
BONNIE CASTILLO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL NURSES UNITED: Yes, we do.
We have over 80 registered nurses under quarantine, and that list is
growing daily. And we had a nurse who wanted to express her experience and
convey her concern with regards to the bureaucracy of the testing and the
fact that she has not been able to get testing, despite having cared for a
HAYES: I`m wondering if you could actually just read that letter, because
I found it really powerful. Would that be all right?
HAYES: Yes. Yes.
So this is the statement from the quarantined nurse from a northern
California facility. “As a nurse, I`m very concerned that not enough is
being done to stop the spread of Coronavirus. I know because I am currently
sick and under quarantine after caring for a patient who tested positive. I
am waiting permission from the federal government to allow for my testing,
even after my physician and county health professional ordered it. I
volunteered to be on the care team for this patient, who we knew was
positive, I did this because I had all the recommended protective gear and
training from my employer. I did this assuming that if something happened
to me, of course I, too, would be cared for. Then what was a small concern
after a few days of caring for this patient became my reality, I became
“When employee health told me that my fever and other symptoms fit the
criteria for potential Coronavirus, I was put on a 14-day quarantine. Since
that criteria was met, the testing would be done.
“My doctor ordered the test through the county. The public county officer
called me and verified my symptoms and agreed with testing, but the
national CDC would not initiate testing. They said that they would not test
me because if I were wearing the recommended protective equipment, then I
wouldn`t have the Coronavirus. What kind of science-based answer is that?
What a ridiculous and uneducated response from the department that is in
charge of our country`s health.”
HAYES: So obviously there are huge concerns that are outlined here. I
wonder if this is concern that you`re hearing from other members as well
about front-line health care workers like your members whether they have
the right protective equipment, the right training and access to testing?
So, first off I would say that, you know, we have the education, the
training, the expertise to treat COVID-19 patients. And we know that we
could actually even – we could stop the spread of the disease, but only if
we have the protection that we need, and that includes appropriate testing
So for us, it`s very concerning that there isn`t a coordinated systemic
approach to this. And it takes leadership. It takes leadership at all
levels, at the federal, state and local levels.
HAYES: Do you think that leadership is absent right now?
CASTILLO: We see that the leadership is discordant, is shifting, and in
fact as today – yesterday and today they are actually moving to weaken the
protections and allow for potentially infected nurses to work and just
monitor themselves at work. This is a very dangerous situation and will
only result in the spread of the virus.
HAYES: The “they” there, that federal officials, local officials.
CASTILLO: CDC. The CDC.
HAYES: You`re saying the CDC is contemplating loosens the restrictions on
front-line health care workers being able to report to work.
CASTILLO: And instead of ramping up. This is the time that we can actually
contain, but we need the appropriate protective measures, which includes
testing, up front and early.
We know – as I said before, I mean, this nurse volunteered to be part of
the care team. Now we have to ensure that if we are – if we do suffer
exposure that all of those appropriate measures, including quarantine, but
also including testing is done, and is done early.
HAYES: All right, Bonnie Castillo, executive director of National Nurses
United. Thank you very much.
CASTILLO: Thank you.
HAYES: Guess who just made millions of dollars, thanks to the policies he
personally pushed in the White House? Jared Kushner`s latest windfall
HAYES: It`s clear that if Joe Biden is the nominee, Donald Trump and his
allies will resuscitate the central part of the president`s own scheme that
got him impeached, the plot to smear Biden and his son as corrupt. In fact,
the jurors in that impeachment trial, the Republican senators, are now
happily taking up the task to further the plot and really not even
pretending it has anything to do with anything other than politics.
Senator Ron Johnson, chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, wrote a
letter about subpoenaing a witness in a probe on the issue, get this, the
day after the South Carolina primary when Joe Biden`s chances were suddenly
Now Johnson has told reporters he`s likely to issue an internal report on
the investigation in one or two months, you know, just around when Biden
might be getting the nomination.
And Donald Trump himself just admitted last night he will bring up Biden
and his son on the trail.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
TRUMP: That will be a major issue in the campaign. I will bring that up
all the time, because I don`t see any way out. I don`t see any way out. For
them, I don`t see how they can answer those questions.
(END VIDEO CLIP0
HAYES: Meanwhile, in the astoundingly corrupt nepotism news, the top story
by a mile is this dispatch that Jared Kushner is selling his stake in a
company that benefited from the tax breaks that he personally pushed for.
As the AP reports, quote, “the $25 million minimum value of Kushner`s stake
at the end of last year is up sharply from three years ago when it was
valued at at least $5 million.”
Here to talk about that, Andrea Bernstein, the co-host of the Trump Inc.
podcast, author of “American Oligarchs: he Kushners, the Trumps and the
Marriage of Money and Power.”
This headline caught my eye, and I still can`t quite believe it. So Kushner
was invested in a company called Cadre. What is that?
ANDREA BERNSTEIN, AUTHOR: So, cadre is a company that was up by Jared
Kushner and Josh Kushner, his brother. It`s a sort of real estate tech
platform so you can invest virtually in real estate essentially.
HAYES: And one of the things that you could do is make use through that
platform of these opportunity zones, right, which are tax credits for
BERNSTEIN: Right. So the opportunity zones came about as a result of the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which is something that Jared Kushner, and
especially Ivanka Trump, pushed in the Senate and it just squeaked past.
And what it enables companies to do, it enables people with capital to get
tax breaks for investing in poor areas of the country, but they`re so
broadly defined and what you can invest in is so broadly defined that
virtually anybody with capital can take advantage of this tax break.
HAYES: And the tax break doesn`t seem to be particularly well targeted.
Like, I`ve seen lots of articles about essentially gaming these opportunity
zones, parking your money in places that don`t really need investment and
getting the benefits.
BERNSTEIN: Right. I mean, we know in opportunity zones broadly that there
have been many cases where government officials have been pushed to include
wealthy people`s investments in them. We don`t know that with the Kushner
family, but we do know that there was this inherent conflict from the
beginning because Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump were pushing a tax break
that the Kushner family company, Kushner Real Estate, and also Cadre, this
tech company, could benefit from.
HAYES: So there`s two conflicts, right. There`s the whole Kushner empire
is built on real estate.
HAYES: They`re pushing for a real estate tax break.
HAYES: That the Kushner family could benefit from.
HAYES: And then there`s a software platform that can also serve as a
platform for investors investing in using these tax breaks.
BERNSTEIN: Correct. So cadre has all of the sort of Trump family conflicts
built into one. You might remember that Jared Kushner didn`t initially
disclose it. He didn`t initially…
HAYES: He didn`t?
BERNSTEIN: He did not. He didn`t initially divest from it. He and his wife
pushed a tax break that could benefit this company.
Now, we have no evidence that the company did specifically benefit from
their specific actions, but it shows the whole structural problem of the
senior advisor in the White House, an incredibly powerful person, profiting
from his family businesses and his business with his brother while also
serving in the White House.
HAYES: Right. So he`s got this investment. He doesn`t disclose it. Later
he discloses it. The company he`s invested could theoretically benefit from
a policy he pushed, and now he`s divesting and banking it appears a 500
percent profit at the minimum?
BERNSTEIN: We don`t – and we don`t know because of the lack of disclosure
to what extent this law helped this family because one of the things that`s
built in is that you get the benefit on your tax return, which as we know
is not public, so we don`t know how much of a benefit it`s going to
individual companies and taxpayers. And that`s one of the problems of the
whole opportunity zone is that there`s no transparency.
HAYES: Wait, but, no, we know Jared Kushner sold his stake in cadre.
BERNSTEIN: We do know he sold his stake.
HAYES: And the value went up enormously in the last three years.
BERNSTEIN: Right. We don`t know why. We don`t know whether if it was
because of this or because of something else.
HAYES: It`s good timing. It`s good to be the king.
BERNSTEIN: I mean, I want to be clear…
HAYES: Yes, of course, no. I`m just saying we know that he had it, we know
he sold it. We know it went up in between and we know he was working at the
BERNSTEIN: It`s the fundamental instability in Jared Kushner`s
relationship with his family business. There were people who have told me
that they were very clear with Jared Kushner and his father, Charlie
Kushner, that he needed to make a choice, White House or family business,
and that the family business was going to be put in this position of
everything was always going to be a question about whether it`s a conflict,
as it should be.
HAYES: And here we are.
Andrea Bernstein, thank you so much for being here.
HAYES: Coming up, as the last woman with a path to the presidency in 2020
drops out, we will assess the legacy of Elizabeth Warren`s candidacy, next.
HAYES: Elizabeth Warren ran an incredible campaign in many ways. Her plans
and policies were just about the most developed of any candidate in recent
memory. And for a short while, that seemed to be working for her.
At the beginning of last October, Warren had ascended to being the front-
runner, topping national polls.
But what followed was a steep decline, ending with the senator not even
winning her home state of Massachusetts on Super Tuesday.
Today, following Warren`s announcement that she`s ending her campaign,
there is a palpable sense of grief among many of her supporters, and
frankly among a lot of American women, who just watched the last viable
female candidate in the race drop out, a race that started with a record-
setting six women running for president.
Earlier today outside her home in Cambridge, Mass, Elizabeth Warren talked
about her own feelings about the end of the road.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I wonder what your message would be to the women and
girls who feel like we`re left with two white men to decide between.
SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN (D-MA): I know. One of the hardest parts of this is
all those pinkie promises and all those little girls who are going to have
to wait four more years. That`s going to be hard.
Gender in this race, you know that is the trap question for every woman. If
you say, yeah, there was sexism in this race, everyone says whiner. And if
you say, no, no, there was no sexism, about a bazillion women think, what
planet do you live on?
(END VIDEO CLIP)
HAYES: All right. We`re going to talk about the legacy of Warren`s
campaign and why it ended the way it did when we come back. Don`t go away.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
WARREN: Corruption has put our planet at risk. Corruption has broken our
economy, and corruption is breaking our democracy. I know what`s broken.
I`ve got a plan to fix it. And that`s why I`m running for president of the
(END VIDEO CLIP)
HAYES: 20,000 people showed up in New York last September to hear
Elizabeth Warren make her case for the presidency. She was drawing enormous
crowds back then. And last fall was kind of the peak of her campaign in the
So what happened? To talk about why the Warren campaign ended the way it
did today, I`m joined by Alicia Garza, co-creator of the Black Lives Matter
movement, and Jelani Cobb, staff writer for The New Yorker.
Alicia, let me start with you as someone who was a supporter and surrogate
of the Warren campaign. I know today is a very difficult day. How do you
understand what happened in this campaign?
ALICIA GARZA, CO-FOUNDER BLACK LIVES MATTER: To be honest, I think what
happened in this campaign is that a very talented, capable, intelligent,
woman was denied her shot at being the nominee of the Democratic Party.
HAYES: Denied by what?
GARZA: Well, I think a number of different things. One, obviously, we`ve
been talking about misogyny and patriarchy all day and we can`t deny the
role that gender played in this campaign. But I also think something that`s
really important is that there was really a sense that there were risks to
take that people weren`t willing to do.
And even though a lot of people thought she was the better candidate, they
weren`t willing to take a risk in relationship to what it might mean to
defeat Donald Trump in 2020, and that`s really fundamentally a shame.
HAYES: Yeah, if you ask me, as someone sort of observed this and reported
on it, to identify the one thing, particularly that inflection point, it
was these fears about her electability.
And particularly this, and I want to give due credit to people that had
these fears, they basically thought this exceedingly smart – I mean,
undeniably brilliant, like, Howitzer of a mind woman, right, extremely
educated and a live wire, right, that this woman, this professional,
brilliant woman, is going to intimidate a certain slice of male voters who
will not vote for her because of essentially sexist inclinations and then
because those people exist then we shouldn`t nominate her. That was
basically the argument, right?
JELANI COBB, THE NEW YORKER: Sure.
I mean, so, I mean, what we`ve had is this kind of dueling cynicisms.
COBB: You know, where people are saying, especially even with the kind of
– one of the obstacles that Bernie Sanders ran into, particularly in the
south among African-American voters, was a very cynical expectation of what
white people were willing to do.
It was like I think white people may be willing to vote for Joe Biden, I
don`t think they`d be willing to vote for Bernie Sanders.
People were making a similar kind of calculation around gender with
Elizabeth Warren. Back in 2008, people made the same kind of calculation
around Barack Obama. And he was able to kind of dodge the raindrops to
prove himself in ways that people were going, oh, well maybe, perhaps, I`ll
give this a shot.
But it creates a burden, like, people say that kind of nothing succeeds
like success, nothing fails like failure, either. And so the ideas that you
only get one shot for any group, any person, that`s from a group that
hasn`t historically been represented in this way, and it compounded in a
way for Elizabeth Warren that is really somewhere between heartbreaking and
outrageous to see.
GARZA: Can I just say, too, though, that I think progressives missed a
really big shot this time around, and in that what I mean is there`s an
opportunity to have a progressive candidate as the nominee, and one of the
things that we did here was we actually started to split hairs in a way
that I think kind of pushed her out of consideration.
If we had gone into this moment saying the ultimate goal here is to get
somebody who is going to move forward an agenda that makes sense for our
families and for us, and we`re going to back whoever it is that shares that
vision, I think we would have seen a very different outcome tonight.
HAYES: But to offer a criticism of the campaign, itself, or at least the
message, it struck me sometimes that the message was extremely well honed
for professional liberals, educated folks, across all sort of different
groups, right? So, like, cis/trans, gay/straight, black, white, Latino,
disability community, but it was a very heady, wonky, kind of literate
message, if I can say so. And was there sort of a failure to broaden out
GARZA: Well, I think that there was a failure in terms of connecting her
message and the message that Sanders was putting forward.
GARZA: Because, again, splitting hairs wasn`t the move.
And when we look at it, the real conversation should have been both/and so
we can get to this rather than either/or. And I think a lot of people just
got spun around in that, frankly.
I`m not sure that I buy that she only appealed to professionals or
intellectuals. I think that a capable woman who has plans for every issue
that you could possibly imagine, how to solve those problems, is also seen
as threatening, but I also feel like the way voters engage with elections
in this country, quite frankly, most voters, is we`ve been taught to engage
around personality and not policy or plan.
COBB: Which is another interesting point here, because when you`re talking
about the kind of wonkiness and cerebral approach she has and you know you
understand it has a particular appeal, the other part of it is that she is
exceedingly plain spoken.
HAYES: Yes. Extremely good communicator.
COBB: Extremely good communicator and she is – she has a kind of almost
stereotypical Midwestern charm.
HAYES: Yes, I agree.
COBB: If she were a man, we`d say it was like Jimmy Stewart.
COBB: Folksy, right. And one of the things I noticed on a personal
interaction with her is I was an Amtrak, this was about two years ago, and
I found myself seated in front of her. We got into a long conversation. And
she`s a professor. And she did this thing of again and again and again at
points where we disagreed, she would point out – she would point out what
she appreciated in my point before moving on to her critique. And I thought
that that was such a valuable way to communicate.
HAYES: Alicia Garza and Jelani Cobb, thank you for joining us tonight.
That is All In for this evening. It turns The Rachel Maddow Show starts
right now with a big interview, Elizabeth Warren, who will be joining
Rachel momentarily. Good evening, Rachel.
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY
Copyright 2020 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the content.>
Copyright 2020 ASC Services II Media, LLC. All materials herein are
protected by United States copyright law and may not be reproduced,
distributed, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast without the
prior written permission of ASC Services II Media, LLC. You may not alter
or remove any trademark, copyright or other notice from copies of the