Tom Moran, editorial page editor for the New Jersey Star-Ledger, talks with Rachel Maddow about his experience reporting on Chris Christie and how the governor's confidence can disguise his not telling the truth. watch
Rachel Maddow looks at Chris Christie's poor polling numbers in his own state of New Jersey and some of the reasons, from scandal to economic failures to his personal behavior that have the newest 2016 Republican candidate facing an uphill battle. watch
Rachel Maddow reminds viewers that former President James K. Polk lost in the state where he was born and the state where he lived, and still won the presidency, but points out that doing so is a rarity. watch
Rachel Maddow reports on enthusiasm for the Bernie Sanders campaign, reflected in the large crowds his events continue to draw, and reports on President Obama setting new policy on overtime pay that will result in a pay raise for millions. watch
* Keep expectations low: "Greece and its European creditors began talking again on Tuesday about how to keep Greece afloat financially, but appeared not to be moving fast enough to prevent the country from missing a debt payment due at the end of the day."
* Iran: "Pushing past a Tuesday deadline, world powers and Iran extended negotiations for a comprehensive nuclear agreement by a week as the U.N. nuclear agency prepared to announce Tehran had met a key condition -- significantly reducing its stocks of enriched uranium that could be used for atomic weapons."
* Climate policy: "In a jam-packed but complex day for international climate action, Brazil, the United States, and China -- three of the world's top 10 greenhouse gas emitters -- all announced new goals Tuesday. The commitments came in different forms and units, ranging from forest hectares to renewable energy gigawatts -- but collectively appeared to represent a new and major step forward towards addressing climate change and cleaning global energy systems."
* This is likely to be a huge case: "The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to hear a challenge to the way public-sector unions finance their operations. Union officials said a ruling against them would deal a blow to organized labor."
* A great week, but not the greatest week: "President Barack Obama said Tuesday that last week -- when he won historic victories on trade, health care and gay rights -- was "gratifying," but he stopped short of calling it his "best week ever," as some pundits have."
* I suppose this is how the system is supposed to work: "A county clerk in Arkansas intends to resign from her position because she doesn't believe in issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples." If you don't want to issue marriage licenses, it's probably best that you don't keep a job that requires you to issue marriage licenses.
It was about eight months ago when Paul Krugman, who hasn't always been President Obama's biggest fan, said what many in the political establishment would not. "Obama has emerged," Krugman wrote, "as one of the most consequential and, yes, successful presidents in American history."
To be sure, it is a little early to start reflecting on the Obama's place in history, since his presidency still has over a year to go, during which time much can happen. But after last week -- the Affordable Care Act's success at the Supreme Court, the breakthrough on marriage equality, the advances of the administration's trade agenda, the breathtaking eulogy in Charleston -- there's been renewed talk, not just about Obama's rejuvenated presidency, but also about his qualifications for the pantheon of American leaders of historic consequence.
My msnbc colleague Benjy Sarlin published a thoughtful piece on the Obama legacy over the weekend.
"At the end of the day, we're part of a long-running story," Obama told the New Yorker's David Remnick in one interview. "We just try to get our paragraph right."
Now consider what the paragraph version of Obama's presidency looks like as of now, with the key terms for next week's social studies midterm highlighted in bold.
"The first black president, President Obama took office amid the Great Recession, stabilized the economy with a stimulus and auto bailout, passed universal health care and Wall Street reform over fierce opposition, and implemented a suite of regulations aimed at combatting climate change. The first president to embrace marriage equality, he presided over the landmark Obergefell v. Hodges decision legalizing it nationwide."
I think Sarlin's right on both counts. First, that's a pretty impressive paragraph that suggets Obama will be remembered as a great and important president.
Second, it's also true that when it comes to history, presidencies tend to lose their rough edges -- we look past day-to-day, granular developments as they get further away -- and leaders are remembered based on their most notable achievements.
White House scandals can, of course, detract from those accomplishments -- see Iran/Contra and Watergate, for example -- but as we discussed a few weeks ago, even conservatives tend to concede, "President Obama has run an amazingly scandal-free administration, not only he himself, but the people around him. He's chosen people who have been pretty scandal-free."
In Republican politics, Karl Rove tends to be one of the party's most respected and influential voices, whether he's earned that stature or not, but that doesn't mean the former Bush/Cheney "architect" is above the occasional intra-party feud.
In recent weeks, for example, Rove has been at odds with presidential hopeful Donald Trump, whom Rove recently referred to, according to various reports, as "a complete idiot." For his part, Trump has called Rove "a total loser."
Far more quietly, Rove also seems to be at odds with another Republican White House hopeful: Jeb Bush.
But arguably of greater interest still is Rove's new dispute with an entirely different GOP presidential candidate: Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas). Oliver Willis explained yesterday that their feud has led to a fascinating series of exchanges.
In his new book A Time For Truth: Reigniting the Promise of America, Cruz wrote that Rove tried to bury a donation President George H.W. Bush made to Cruz for his 2009 Texas attorney general campaign.
Cruz explained that Rove was "in the process of helping raise money for the George W. Bush presidential library in Dallas" while "Texas donors were giving the Bushes tens of millions, including major donors who were supporting the Dallas state rep who wanted to run for attorney general." According to Cruz, those donors started "berating" Rove.
Rove denied the allegation, writing, "When Mr. Cruz and I talked in 2009, I was not raising money for the Bush Library," adding, "nor were any library donors 'berating' me."
Now, I can appreciate why much of this sounds like inside baseball, but there's a broader point to the dispute that makes it more significant than it may appear at first blush.
Lucas Vazquez and Kasey O'Brien TRMS World Cup correspondents (and intrepid interns) break down the USWNT's Quarterfinal win against China, and look ahead to tonight's highly anticipated semi-final showdown against Germany. (Video image credits: Sean... watch
Four years ago, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) was pretty well positioned for a presidential campaign. Republican insiders pleaded with him to run; much of the political media made little effort to hide its affection for him; and the Republican governor, still untainted by scandal and failure, remained quite popular in his home state.
Four years later, watching Christie finally launch his White House bid, it was hard not to wonder whether he's four years too late. MSNBC's Aliyah Frumin reported on the latest Republican to join the crowded field.
"We need a government in Washington, D.C., that remembers you went there to work for us, not the other way around," Christie told a crowd of about 700 people at a packed gymnasium at Livingston High School, Christie's alma mater – where he served as class president and catcher on the baseball team.
Employing some of his characteristically colorful language, Christie added, "I am not running for president as a surrogate for being prom king."
I'm not altogether sure what that means -- he used similarly odd rhetoric in his kickoff, including "force the horse" -- though the governor nevertheless boasted about his habit of "telling it like it is." Christie added, "I mean what I say, and I say what I mean."
And at first blush, that's not a bad message for a White House hopeful. Christie's problem, however, is that the bravado isn't true, and he has nothing else to fall back on.
Today's installment of campaign-related news items that won't necessarily generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:
* It took him a while, but Jeb Bush said during a campaign stop yesterday that he believes the Confederate battle flag has become a "racist" symbol.
* Speaking of the former Florida governor, Bush is reportedly planning to release 33 years of tax returns today. A campaign spokesperson boasted, "This is more than any presidential candidate in the history of the United States," and as far as I know, that's true.
* President Obama's approval rating is up to 50% in the new national CNN poll, its highest point in two years. I can guarantee this is a number Democratic and Republican presidential campaigns are keeping an eye on -- the more popular Obama becomes, the more it affects the public's appetite for sweeping national changes.
* Marco Rubio has made no secret of his hopes to win over megadonor Sheldon Adelson's support, and to that end, it matters that GOP fundraising bundler Phil Rosen is getting behind the Florida senator's campaign.
* And speaking of Rubio, the Republican's campaign has already begun "reserving television airtime in the first four nominating states, seven months before a vote is cast."
* Ted Cruz has a new book out and it apparently goes after Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in rather direct ways. Cruz is basing much of his Republican presidential campaign on his hostility for the Beltway establishment.
Retired right-wing neurosurgeon Ben Carson took his Republican presidential campaign to Iowa last week, where he delivered a non-traditional message to potential supporters. "I really don't want to do this, to be honest with you," Carson said of his national campaign.
As a rule, those aren't the words a candidate is supposed to use about his quest for the White House -- or really any job in any context. "I really don't want to do this" is one of those messages that tends not to inspire confidence.
A few days later, Carson won the Western Conservative Summit straw poll.
To be sure, I'm generally skeptical about the predictive value of these straw polls, but Carson's overall strength is also reflected in polling. His national standing has steadily improved in recent months, despite Carson's complete inability to campaign effectively and/or run an effective organization, and by some measures, he's running third or fourth nationally in the crowded Republican field.
Byron York, a prominent conservative journalist, reported yesterday that many in the GOP are mystified.
The combination of Carson's rise and his unorthodox campaign style -- Carson's short-on-specifics stump speech is like no other -- has left some of his rivals baffled. "I just don't get it," one said in a private conversation recently. "I don't get it."
In all candor, I don't either. Carson, who has never sought or held elected office, continues to prove that he's simply not up for the job. And yet, the worse the retired doctor performs as a candidate, the more his poll numbers go up.
As we talked about in May, it's be so much easier to dismiss Ben Carson's candidacy as a joke if only GOP voters didn't seem to like the guy so much.
As recently as April, it seemed the entire, ridiculous fight over "death panels" had come full circle. What had started as a sensible Republican idea about advance directives and living wills transformed into right-wing hysteria, but was now back again -- Jeb Bush told a New Hampshire audience he likes the idea of a government mandate on advance directives.
The position actually put Bush slightly to the left of President Obama, and it seemed to bury the "death panels" garbage once and for all.
Or maybe that was wishful thinking.
Just last week, after the Supreme Court upheld tax subsidies for consumers' insurance, Fox's Sean Hannity told his audience, "You're screwed ... death panels will exist."
A day later, as BuzzFeed reported, a member of Congress pushed a very similar line.
Rep. Mo Brooks, a Republican from Alabama, says people who contract expensive-to-treat illnesses are going to die under Obamacare. [...]
Brooks said "ultimately, you're looking at a lesser quality of care -- health care." He added that the 15-person board of health-care experts created under the law to control costs -- the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) -- is making decisions about "whether a group of people live or die."
In case anyone's forgotten, in reality, the Independent Payment Advisory Board is most certainly not making decisions about whether a group of people live or die. That's just bonkers.
But Brooks just kept going (and going), insisting that ailing patients are "going to be denied coverage" under the American system.
Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.
Rachel Maddow LIVE
Speak out! Make your voice heard by tagging your posts #maddow