The Rachel Maddow Show Weekdays at 9PM


... more Duration: {{video.duration.momentjs}}

Rachel Maddow StoriesRSS

select from:

E.g., 4/23/2017
E.g., 4/23/2017

Thursday's Mini-Report, 4.20.17

04/20/17 05:30PM

Today's edition of quick hits:

* France "was on high alert Thursday after one police officer was killed and another wounded in a shooting in central Paris, the National Police Union reported. The person suspected of opening fire on the officers on the Champs-Elysees was also shot and killed, Reuters reported, citing a police source."

* Donald Trump said the incident "looks like another terrorist attack" before French authorities were prepared to offer any such assessment.

* Venezuela: "General Motors said Wednesday it has been forced to stop operating in Venezuela after one of its plants was illegally seized by local authorities. The seizure, in the country's industrial hub of Valencia, comes amid a deepening economic and political crisis that has sparked weeks of deadly street protests."

* This seems like a bad idea: "The Internal Revenue Service is about to start using four private debt-collection companies to chase down overdue payments from hundreds of thousands of people who owe money to the federal government, a job it has handled in house for years."

* Iran: "Former Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was barred from running in next month's election Thursday while President Hassan Rouhani was among six candidates approved by Iran's conservative-controlled Guardian Council, state media reported."

* The number of billionaires on Team Trump drops by one: "Unable to untangle his complex financial holdings to the satisfaction of the Office of Government Ethics, Cubs board member Todd Ricketts, tapped by President Donald Trump to be the Deputy Commerce Secretary, on Wednesday withdrew his nomination."

* This beats moving to a third state to launch another failed Senate campaign: "President Donald Trump announced Thursday his plan to nominate former Massachusetts Republican Senator Scott Brown as ambassador to New Zealand. The Senate must confirm the nomination."
read more

Image: Jeff Sessions

AG Jeff Sessions seems to forget that Hawaii is a state

04/20/17 04:05PM

About a month ago, Donald Trump's second attempt at a Muslim ban ran into the same legal troubles as his first attempt. U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson, a federal judge in Hawaii, blocked implementation of the administration's policy.

The fact that Attorney General Jeff Sessions disagreed with the judge is not surprising. What's notable, however, is how Sessions disagreed. CNN reported this afternoon:
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said this week he was amazed that a judge in Hawaii could block President Donald Trump's executive order halting immigration from several majority Muslim countries.

Sessions made the comments on "The Mark Levin Show" Wednesday evening.
The Republican attorney general, after noting his optimism about future court proceedings, specifically told the far-right radio host, "I really am amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the president of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and constitutional power."

This is a pretty remarkable thing for the nation's chief law-enforcement official to say out loud, in public, and on purpose.
read more

A man runs through a closed National Mall in Washington, DC, Oct 3, 2013.

White House is 'gearing up' for a government shutdown fight

04/20/17 12:58PM

It's one of those annoying details that the political world probably doesn't want to think about, but current funding for the federal government expires a week from tomorrow. Without an agreement or an extension, the government will shut down at midnight, April 28.

The conventional wisdom, which I've largely believed, has said for weeks that a shutdown is very unlikely, but signals from Donald Trump's White House suggest such an outcome is quite possible. Politico reported late yesterday, for example:
The White House, under internal pressure to show legislative achievements ahead of the 100-day mark, is gearing up for a government shutdown fight to secure money for a border wall, more immigration enforcement officers and a bigger military, according to White House and congressional sources familiar with the plan.

It is a risky gambit. With almost uniform Democratic opposition to nearly all of the Trump administration's spending proposals, the fight could lead to a government shutdown next Friday.... Congressional Republicans, desperately looking to avoid a shutdown scare, are eyeing a modest increase for border security -- perhaps an increase in funding for surveillance technology -- and a small uptick in military spending. But two senior White House officials say they want a bigger win out of the fight, and an important deadline might help.
The report added that OMB Director Mick Mulvaney White House Legislative Affairs Director Marc Short are pushing for "billions" for Trump's agenda, including money for a border wall.

There is no scenario in which this is wise.
read more

Thursday's Campaign Round-Up, 4.20.17

04/20/17 12:00PM

Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.

* Two days after Georgia's congressional special election, the House Republican leadership's super PAC, the Congressional Leadership Fund, has already launched a new round of attack ads targeting Jon Ossoff ahead of the June runoff election.

* On a related note, Ossoff reportedly raised over $500,000 yesterday, which is an extraordinary one-day haul for any congressional candidate. Politico noted it was "the most lucrative day of the campaign so far for Ossoff."

* Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is still on a unity tour with DNC Chairman Tom Perez, but the Vermont independent indicated yesterday he won't throw his support behind Ossoff.

* The latest national Quinnipiac poll shows Donald Trump's approval rating improving a bit, climbing to 40%, thanks almost entirely to increased support from Republican voters.

* Rep. Jason Chaffetz's (R-Utah) surprise retirement announcement yesterday has jolted Republican politics in Utah, and set off a scramble in the race to replace him.

* Indiana, which will be home to a competitive Senate race next year, is reportedly trying to clean up its voting rolls. The result, according to a report from the Northwest Indiana Times, is that "nearly half a million individuals have been deleted from Indiana's list of registered voters" since November.

* Despite his frequent campaign-season criticisms, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) says he's now "all in" with Donald Trump. The Republican senator told Fox News this morning, "I am like the happiest dude in America right now."
read more

Richard Cordray, nominee for director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, testifies at a confirmation hearing before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs on March 12, 2013 in Washington, DC. (Photo by T.J. Kirkpatrick...

Why Richard Cordray is still on the job at the CFPB

04/20/17 11:22AM

In an era of Republican dominance, the future of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is very much in doubt. Ask congressional Republicans which federal offices they'd most like to eliminate, and it's a safe bet the CFPB would be the first agency most of them mention.

But at least for now, the CFPB still exists, and its director, Richard Cordray, is still on the job -- a dynamic a Wall Street Journal piece recently described as "the greatest mystery in Washington."

Why hasn't Donald Trump kicked him to the curb? Let's unwrap this mystery.

The way the CFPB is structured, its director is not just another member of an administration. Instead, when President Obama chose Cordray for the post in 2013, it was for a five-year appointment, which doesn't end until 2018.

Trump, of course, would love to replace Cordray with someone who'd be far friendlier with the financial industry and less aggressive on protecting consumers, but as USA Today recently reported, "the law says the director may be removed by the president only for 'inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.'"

The estimable David Dayen explained the White House's dilemma this week.
[I]f Trump did try to fire Cordray, the director could sue for wrongful termination, arguing that Trump was pursuing a policy goal instead of following the for-cause language in the statute. As Georgetown law professor Adam Levitin explains, that would lead to a public lawsuit in which Cordray could seek, and possibly get, discovery, including a deposition of the president and maybe a peek at his tax returns, to see if Trump was benefiting himself personally by tossing out a consumer watchdog that affects his personal business interests.

Clearly the White House wants to steer clear of anything like that.
Team Trump does, however, have a back-up plan of sorts.
read more

The sun rises near the White House on Nov. 8, 2016 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Zach Gibson/Getty)

White House solicits public input on eliminating agencies

04/20/17 10:49AM

Seven years ago, House Republicans unveiled an online gimmick they were excited about, which was called "YouCut." The way the system was set up, GOP lawmakers would offer the public five options for cutting government spending; Americans would vote online; and then the House would force a vote on the top vote-getter the following week.

In practice, the whole endeavor was rather silly. The public wasn't given any real information about the spending or the associated programs; the Democratic-led Senate didn't much care about the House's stunt; and the whole initiative was forgotten soon after.

It appears, however, that the concept behind "YouCut" is making something of a comeback. New York magazine reported the other day:
The White House moved forward with its effort to drastically reduce the size of the federal government [last week], directing agencies to produce a plan to reduce their personnel.... The changes outlined in a 14-page memo issued by [OMB Director Mick Mulvaney] were based on the budget outline President Trump released last month, which called for sharp cuts to many agencies to finance large increases in military and Homeland Security spending.

Many were taken aback by Trump's proposal to slash funding for agencies like the EPA, State Department, and Health and Human Services, and eliminate many smaller programs like the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowment for the Arts.

But if anyone has even more radical ideas, the White House is all ears.
And to that end, the White House has created an online tool in which -- you guessed it -- Americans can vote on which federal agencies should be scrapped.

Visitors are asked, "What agency would you like to reform?" and are presented with dozens of options. That's followed by the second question, "What agency would you like to eliminate?"
read more

A laptop in use. (Photo by TEK/Science Photo Library/Corbis)

Despite his promises, Trump's cybersecurity plan doesn't exist

04/20/17 10:09AM

Two weeks before his presidential inauguration, Donald Trump met with leaders of the U.S. intelligence community, who briefed him on the Russian hacking scandal. Almost immediately after the private discussion, Trump straight-up lied about what he'd learned, insisting in a statement that intelligence professionals told him Russia's operation had "absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election."

The intelligence community hadn't said that at all. Trump just made it up.

But in the same written statement, the Republican added that the nation's cyber infrastructure is at risk and he announced that his team would produce a new cybersecurity plan "within 90 days " of his inauguration. A week later, he had a related tweet pointing to the same deadline.

Politico published an interesting status-check today.
Thursday, Trump hits his 90-day mark. There is no team, there is no plan, and there is no clear answer from the White House on who would even be working on what.
It's quite a fine-tuned machine, isn't it?

There was some talk of Rudy Giuliani having a cybersecurity role on Team Trump, but Politico reports that the former mayor is not working on the White House's plan. Neither is the National Security Council.
read more

Image: President Trump Meets With The National Association of Manufacturers

Debate over pesticides enters Donald Trump's 'swamp'

04/20/17 09:20AM

At first blush, it may seem like an obscure, technical debate. The Associated Press reports that a four-year review conducted by government scientists of three pesticides -- chlorpyrifos, diazinon and malathion -- found that they "pose a risk to nearly every endangered species they studied." Federal agencies are poised to issue findings on how to limit use of these pesticides.

The story takes on a broader political significance, however, when we consider what one of the pesticide manufacturers is up to. The AP explained:
Dow Chemical is pushing the Trump administration to scrap the findings of federal scientists who point to a family of widely used pesticides as harmful to about 1,800 critically threatened or endangered species.

Lawyers representing Dow, whose CEO also heads a White House manufacturing working group, and two other makers of organophosphates sent letters last week to the heads of three Cabinet agencies. The companies asked them "to set aside" the results of government studies the companies contend are fundamentally flawed.
As one might imagine, Dow is pointing to its own research, which is in conflict with the information compiled by government scientists.

If this sounds familiar, there's a good reason. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, Donald Trump's controversial far-right choice to lead the agency, decided two weeks ago to side with Dow Chemical – against the advice of the EPA's researchers – on the use of chlorpyrifos, one of the insecticides in question.

Now, apparently, Dow Chemical wants Team Trump to side with the company once more.

And while I'm not privy to the administration's deliberations, it seems Dow Chemical has reason to be optimistic about its chances. Not only is the Trump administration ideologically predisposed to agree with corporate interests over environmental interests, but in this case the ties between the company and the president run deep.
read more

Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore speaks to the congregation of Kimberly Church of God, June 28, 2015, in Kimberley, Ala. (Photo by Butch Dill/AP)

Roy Moore becomes the latest Alabama Republican to fall

04/20/17 08:41AM

When it comes to the state's elected leaders, it's been a rough 10 months for Alabama. In June, Mike Hubbard (R), the state's former House Speaker, was forced to resign in disgrace after being convicted of multiple felonies. Last month, Robert Bentley (R), the state's then current governor, was forced to resign as part of a plea agreement in the wake of his sex/corruption scandal.

And then there's state Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore (R). The Alabama Media Group reported yesterday:
The Alabama Supreme Court today upheld the decision that removed Roy Moore from his position as chief justice. [...]

Moore can't appeal the ruling to the federal courts because there are no federal issues. "This is it," he said.
Moore's term on the state bench wasn't up until 2019, but the suspension is effective immediately, and it has the effect of ending his judicial career. Because of his age,'s report added, "he cannot run for the office again."

In case anyone needs a refresher on how we reached this point, let's recap. Last year, Moore, in his official capacity, ordered Alabama’s probate judges to ignore the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling on marriage equality. The federal courts, not surprisingly, were not amused by Moore’s “creative” approach to American jurisprudence.

And neither was Alabama’s Judicial Inquiry Commission, which accused Moore of having “flagrantly disregarded and abused his authority” – a charge that appears to coincide nicely with reality. Moore responded to the accusations by continuing to argue that Alabama’s ban on same-sex marriages is still state law, because as far as he’s concerned, the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling doesn’t count.

If all of this sounds familiar, it’s because Moore, a cause celebre for many on the far-right fringe, has been kicked off the bench once before for official misconduct.
read more

Image: US President Donald J. Trump and Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel joint press conference

Following aircraft carrier fiasco, Trump alienates another ally

04/20/17 08:00AM

Vice President Mike Pence has visited several Asia-Pacific countries in recent days, hoping to solidify U.S. relationships in the region, and his trip included some time at the demilitarized zone between South Korea and North Korea. The Washington Post reported that the vice president wasn't scheduled to go outside a South Korean building at the DMZ, but he said he wanted to make a point.

"I thought it was important that we went outside," Pence told the Post. "I thought it was important that people on the other side of the DMZ see our resolve in my face."

I'm not at all sure what that's supposed to mean. Does the vice president seriously believe that North Koreans, looking through binoculars and telescopes, would see his steely gaze and adopt a new posture, intimidated by Pence's face?

As a rule, that's not how foreign policy works. On the contrary, foreign countries recognize "resolve" when they see the United States following through on its commitments -- which is why it's a bit of a problem that Donald Trump and top members of his team told the world an aircraft carrier and its support ships -- the USS Carl Vinson carrier strike group -- were headed towards the Korean peninsula, when in reality, they were not.

The New York Times reports that U.S. allies in South Korea, who assumed the White House was telling the truth, are not pleased.
When news broke less than two weeks ago that the Trump administration was sending the aircraft carrier Carl Vinson to the Korean Peninsula, many South Koreans feared a war with North Korea. Others cheered for Washington, calling the deployment a powerful symbol of its commitment to deterring the North.

On Wednesday, after it was revealed that the carrier strike group was actually thousands of miles away and had been heading in the opposite direction, toward the Indian Ocean, South Koreans felt bewildered, cheated and manipulated by the United States, their country's most important ally. [...]

Compounding their anger over the Carl Vinson episode, many South Koreans were also riled at Mr. Trump for his assertion in a Wall Street Journal interview last week that the Korean Peninsula "used to be a part of China." Although Korea was often invaded by China and forced to pay tributes to its giant neighbor, many Koreans say the notion that they were once Chinese subjects is egregiously insulting.
An Associated Press report added this morning, "Unpredictable. Unhinged. Dangerous. Many South Koreans are using those words to describe the president of their most important ally, rather than the leader of their archrival to the North."
read more


About The Rachel Maddow Show

Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.



Latest Book