Jeb Bush's mother is helping him raise money for his super PAC. Jeb Bush's brother is helping him raise money for his super PAC. And now Jeb Bush's father is getting in on the game.
Ahead of a fundraiser he's attending Thursday evening in Houston, former President George H.W. Bush has penned a letter to potential donors asking them to give "even $25" to a super-PAC supporting his son, former Florida Governor Jeb Bush.
In the two-page letter obtained by Bloomberg Politics, the former president says his son, who is considering his own presidential campaign, "stands out for his refreshing and complete lack of interest in negative attacks."
Putting aside the fact that the former governor launches negative attacks against President Obama on a daily basis, it seems Jeb Bush is running out of famous relatives -- though I suppose there's nothing stopping Texas Land Commissioner George P. Bush, Jeb's son, from joining the fun.
"I love the fact that we have a united family," Jeb Bush told Fox News Radio yesterday.
To be sure, there's nothing illegal or untoward about candidates relying on their immediate family members for campaign help -- though few have families this powerful -- and the Florida Republican has focused most of his energies of late on filling his campaign coffers.
But as we discussed the other day, there's another angle to all of this that's more politically problematic.
On practically all the major issues, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R), an unannounced presidential candidate, has adopted a doctrinaire, far-right posture. No one would look at the Republican governor's agenda and call him a "moderate."
But Walker has evolved on some issues in ways that may make some GOP voters nervous. Over the course of a long career -- Walker became a political candidate at age 22 and has spent half his life in public office -- the Wisconsinite has shifted his stances on issues like energy policy, education, and even gun safety.
But immigration remains the most problematic of them all. This Wall Street Journalreport yesterday caused quite a stir.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker told a private dinner of New Hampshire Republicans this month that he backed the idea of allowing undocumented immigrants to stay in the country and to eventually become eligible for citizenship, a position at odds with his previous public statements on the matter.
Mr. Walker's remarks, which were confirmed by three people present, vary from the call he has made for "no amnesty" -- a phrase widely employed by people who believe immigrants who broke the law by entering the country without permission shouldn't be awarded legal status or citizenship.
The governor's aides vehemently deny the accuracy of the WSJ piece and insist his position has not changed. As best as I can tell, there's no tangible evidence to clear this up. Some Republican attendees said Walker endorsed a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants; the governor denies it. Who's right? It's hard to say.
It's easy to say, however, that Walker, even before yesterday's report, has struggled to bring clarity to his position on immigration.
My favorite Harry Reid story comes from an incident that unfolded fairly early in his career, not long after he was appointed to chair the Nevada Gaming Commission, which meant confronting systemic organized crime. In July 1978, a man named Jack Gordon offered Reid $12,000 to approve some new gaming devices for casino use.
Reid, of course, quickly contacted the FBI, which set up a sting operation. The trap was set: Reid would host a meeting with Gordon, with FBI agents waiting in the next room, watching on secret video cameras recording the exchange for use in trial. Reid would say, "Is this the money?" at which point, the agents would rush in and arrest Gordon.
But when it came time for the sting, Reid, a former boxer, found it hard to control his temper. As the New Yorkerreported several years ago, "the videotape shows [Reid] getting up from his chair and saying, 'You son of a bitch, you tried to bribe me!' and attempting to choke Gordon." The FBI agents rushed in to arrest Gordon -- and to pry Reid away from the man trying to bribe him.
I've always thought American politics should have more lawmakers who try to strangle those who offer bribes and fewer lawmakers who accept bribes.
I thought of this story this morning after learning that the Senate Minority Leader has decided to retire.
Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid will not run for reelection next year, he announced Friday morning through a YouTube video. The Nevada lawmaker has been recovering from injuries he endured from an exercise accident on New Year's Day.
"The decision that I have made has absolutely nothing to do with my injury, has nothing to do with my being minority leader, and it certainly has nothing to do with my ability to be reelected," he said.
Reid, who'll wrap up his 30-year career at the end of 2016, leaves behind an amazing legacy of legislative accomplishments. After leading Senate Democrats for a decade, his departure also shakes up the Capitol Hill landscape quite a bit.
A little after 3 a.m. eastern this morning, the Republican-led Senate approved a far-right budget plan, slashing public investments and dismantling social-insurance programs like Medicare. The final vote, 52 to 46, did not come as a surprise -- the question was when, not if, GOP senators would approve their budget blueprint.
What did come as a surprise, however, was a vote late yesterday on a top progressive priority.
The reason it takes so long for the upper chamber to vote on a budget is that members introduce hundreds of proposed amendments -- 739, to be exact -- several dozen of which reach the floor as part of a process affectionately called the "vote-a-rama." The measures, like the budget itself, is non-binding, but members see value in getting senators on the record, voting up or down, on a wide range of priorities.
One of those measures was championed by Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), who pushed a proposal for paid sick leave. Oddly enough, it passed -- and the way in which it passed tells an interesting story.
Just a few weeks ago, the Healthy Families Act -- which would allow employees to earn up to seven days of paid sick leave -- seemed like just another White House proposal doomed to die in the newly Republican Senate. But this afternoon, it gained a surprise vote of confidence: 61 senators voted for an amendment to the budget that would do essentially the same thing.
That doesn't mean it will become law. Budget resolutions are not binding, so it's a largely symbolic move. But it's important: If family-friendly policies gain enough bipartisan support, they could end up substantially improving conditions for millions of workers who've long gone without any paid time off at all.
As the Washington Post piece makes clear, the finally tally wasn't particularly close: it passed with 61 votes, including 12 Republicans. In fact, every GOP incumbent who's worried about re-election next year -- Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), and Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) -- threw their support behind paid sick leave.
Yes, it was non-binding, but the broader salience of the vote was hard to miss: vulnerable Republicans sometimes see value in embracing progressive ideas. Paid sick leave may be a top priority for President Obama and congressional Democrats, but much of the GOP also realizes it's a very popular idea with the American mainstream.
Rachel Maddow reviews the circumstances of past cases pilots or co-pilots trying to crash a plane, with the lessons of some instances contradicting the lessons of others, and the only common thread being the human fallibility of the pilots. watch
Rachel Maddow explains the backstory on a running joke at the press conferences of members of the University of Wisconsin basketball team who flirt with the press stenographer and try to keep her on her toes by saying big, complicated words. watch
Richard Engel, NBC News chief foreign correspondent, talks with Rachel Maddow about the convoluted relationship between Iran and the United States as reflected in the mix of their cooperation and opposition roles in conflicts across the Middle East. watch
* Germany: "The co-pilot of the crashed Germanwings plane appears to have 'intentionally' brought the plane down while his captain was locked out of the cockpit and banging to be let back in, prosecutors said Thursday."
* Yemen: "Egypt said Thursday that it was prepared to send troops into Yemen as part of a Saudi-led campaign to drive back the Iranian-backed Houthi advance, signaling the growing likelihood of a protracted ground war on the tip of the Arabian Peninsula."
* That's a lot of troops: "Saudi Arabia has mobilized 150,000 troops and some 100 fighter jets to rout Iran-linked fighters that have taken over swathes of neighboring Yemen, a security adviser to the kingdom told NBC News on Thursday."
* On to the Senate: "The House gave sweeping approval Thursday to a bipartisan plan to alter payment systems for Medicare providers and extend a popular children's health program, fueling momentum for legislation that could soon reach President Obama's desk. The vote, 392 to 37, came as Senate Democrats' resistance to the more than $200 billion health package faded and Obama signaled he would sign the plan."
* Oklahoma: "Gov. Mary Fallin has declared a state of emergency for Tulsa County and 24 other counties after severe storms that included tornadoes swept through the state Wednesday. "
* Detroit: "Officials in suburban Detroit appealed for patience and calm Thursday while investigators review why police repeatedly punched, kicked and Tasered an unarmed black driver who ran a stop sign."
* What? "According to a shocking report released Thursday by the Department of Justice, agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration engaged in 'sex parties' with prostitutes hired by drug cartels in Colombia"?
* CFPF: "The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau on Thursday unveiled a new plan that it said would help rein in the $50 billion payday lending industry and prevent low-income borrowers from facing spiraling levels of debt."
In Arizona last year, then-Gov. Jan Brewer (R) vetoed a controversial right-to-discriminate measure, ending a fight that generated national attention. The dispute was pretty straightforward -- would the state empower business owners to discriminate against LGBT customers? Facing boycott threats, Arizona backed off.
Bucking intense criticism from citizens, celebrities, tech leaders, and convention customers, Indiana's Republican Gov. Mike Pence quietly signed a controversial religious freedom bill into law on Thursday. Opponents warn the measure will sanction discrimination against LGBT people, and cost the Hoosier State millions in tourism revenue. [...]
The new law will prohibit a governmental entity from substantially burdening a person's religious beliefs, unless that entity can prove it's relying on the least restrictive means possible to further a compelling governmental interest.
The governor did not allow the media to witness the bill signing -- Pence completed the process behind closed doors -- though he did publish a photo from the event on Twitter. It appears the governor was surrounded by a group of religious leaders.
Time will tell how the law is implemented, and the degree to which Indiana has cleared the way for state-sanctioned discrimination, though the prospect of economic consequences are already real -- tech giant Salesforce has suggested it will avoid Indiana in the future, while organizers of Gen Con are also considering new venues.
But I was also struck by what happened when Pence was asked whether there were any real-world developments in Indiana that justified this new state law.
House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) has never shown a deep interest in foreign policy, but his comments this morning at his weekly news briefing were more unsettling than most.
Speaker John A. Boehner dismissed Barack Obama Thursday as an "anti-war president" unwilling to lead an international coalition against the Islamic State terror group, also known as ISIS or ISIL; al-Qaida and other terrorist organizations.
"The world is starving for American leadership, but America has an anti-war president.... If America leads, our allies would be tickled to death and be happy to join our coalition."
Look, this clearly isn't the Speaker's best subject, and some superficiality is to be expected when he tries to address the issue. But Boehner's message this morning wasn't just disjointed; it was emblematic of a policymaker who doesn't understand national-security policy nearly as well as he should.
Boehner Error #1: In the Speaker's mind, people are around the world are "starving for American leadership," but they're not getting it because, from Boehner's perspective, President Obama is "anti-war." In other words, according to the nation's top Republican lawmaker, to lead is to wage war, and to wage war is to show leadership. One is necessarily tied to the other -- except in reality, where this idea is ridiculous.
Boehner Error #2: Boehner is also under the impression that our allies would work in coalition with the United States if only Obama would lead. But as those who follow current events probably know, this is already happening -- Obama assembled a coalition to target ISIS targets in the Middle East; Obama assembled a coalition to negotiate an agreement to curtail Iran's nuclear ambitions; Obama is working with U.S. allies to combat the climate crisis; and on and on.
Boehner Error #3: The Speaker is convinced "America has an anti-war president." I'd love to know more about how Boehner defines "anti-war," because in our version of reality, Obama has launched military offensives in Iraq; waged war in Afghanistan; used force in Libya; launched another offensive in Syria; used drones to target suspected terrorists in Pakistan (in addition to ordering the strike on Osama bin Laden); and deployed forces in Somalia and Yemen.
The controversy surrounding the Senate Republicans' letter to Iran has started to die down, but some congressional Democrats still aren't happy about the fact that 47 GOP lawmakers tried to sabotage American foreign policy.
In fact, one Senate Democrat in particular came up with a creative response intended to stop stunts like these in the future. Zach Carter reports today:
Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) delivered a pitch-perfect trolling lesson to the Senate on Wednesday, filing an amendment calling to defund "the purchase of stationary or electronic devices for the purpose of members of Congress or congressional staff communicating with foreign governments and undermining the role of the President as Head of State in international nuclear negotiations on behalf of the United States."
In other words, Stabenow wants to defund Tom Cotton letters.
The full text of the Michigan Democrat's amendment is online here (pdf).
Is there any chance Stabenow measure will actually pass? Well, no, and by all appearances, that's not really the point. Instead, this is the senator's not-so-subtle way of reminding Cotton and his cohorts that they made a very serious mistake and Democrats aren't prepared to just forget all about it.
The religious right, as a political movement, may not have quite as much influence over the Republican Party as it once did, but there's no denying that social conservative activists still make up a big chunk of the GOP base. Collectively, these so-called "values voters" can play a key role in choosing the party's next presidential nominee.
And at this early stage in the process, the religious right is repeating a familiar message: if social conservatives stick together, rally behind a trusted standard bearer, and prevent the movement from dividing its support in a crowded field, they can play the role of kingmaker.
Fearing that Republicans will ultimately nominate an establishment presidential candidate like Jeb Bush, leaders of the nation's Christian right have mounted an ambitious effort to coalesce their support behind a single social-conservative contender months before the first primary votes are cast. [...]
The efforts to coalesce behind an alternative candidate -- in frequent calls, teleconferences and meetings involving a range of organizations, many of them with overlapping memberships -- are premised on two articles of conservative faith: Republicans did not win the White House in the past two elections because their nominees were too moderate and failed to excite the party's base. And a conservative alternative failed to win the nomination each time because voters did not unite behind a single champion in the primary fight.
Tony Perkins, the president of the Family Research Council, told the New York Times, "There's a shared desire to come behind a candidate." Social conservatives aren't ready to make a choice, but Perkins added that it's "not too early for the conversations to begin."
We don't yet know who the religious right will embrace, but we can say with some confidence who the movement has ruled out. Jeb Bush has maintained an aggressiveoutreach campaign to leading social conservatives, and the former governor has even hired a prominent religious right attorney as a campaign adviser, but it's clear the Christian Right doesn't see Bush as a trusted and reliable ally.
Which leaves a half-dozen other conservatives for the religious right to choose from. The leading contenders appear to be Ted Cruz, Bobby Jindal, Rick Perry, and Mike Huckabee.
But there's a larger question hanging over head: doesn't this seem a little familiar?
Today's installment of campaign-related news items that won't necessarily generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:
* Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) said this morning that if he were elected president, he'd "disown" any international nuclear agreement with Iran on his first day in office. Walker, it's worth noting, does not yet know whether there will be a deal and he has no idea what policies may be included in an agreement.
* New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R), who used to support immigration reform, has "quietly signed onto an amicus brief opposing President Obama's executive action on immigration." The legal brief was filed earlier this week.
* Vice President Biden has not yet announced his future plans, but msnbc's Alex Seitz-Wald has an interesting take on where Biden stands and the possibility of a presidential campaign.
* Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) may have succeeded former Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas), winning her seat in 2010, but Hutchison has no plans to support her fellow Texan. The former senator told msnbc yesterday she intends to support former Gov. Jeb Bush's (R) campaign.
* Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) claimed this week that President Obama's "entire political machine" went to Israel in the hopes of derailing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's re-election campaign. As is too often the case, Rubio's claims appear to be at odds with reality.
* Hillary Clinton continues to hire members of her unannounced campaign operation, this week hiring Teddy Goff, the digital director of President Obama's 2012 campaign, as part of her new team of online strategists.
Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.
Rachel Maddow LIVE
Speak out! Make your voice heard by tagging your posts #maddow