NBC News' First Read did a nice job summarizing Donald Trump's campaign troubles from just the last five days.
[T]hink about all of the campaign-related errors over the last five days. The botched VP rollout. The awkward "60 Minutes" interview. The fact that Trump and Mike Pence never hit the campaign trail to capitalize on the VP announcement. And then last night. What you are seeing is the culmination of a campaign put together by gum and shoestrings.
Note, "last night" was a reference to Melania Trump plagiarizing Michelle Obama, but that wasn't the only problem that emerged during the first night of the Republican National Convention. The party gathering, intended to help the GOP put its best foot forward, was ostensibly organized by members of Trump's team, who failed to prevent all kinds of opening night mistakes -- which even included the benediction.
Stuart Stevens, a leading strategist for Mitt Romney's presidential campaign in 2012, added this morning on Twitter, "These past few days ... is forecast of what happens when you try to run presidential campaign without a campaign."
For months, there's been speculation about just how far a candidate can go with a campaign based on celebrity, resentment, and racial animus. The line from Trump's allies isn't necessarily wrong: the amateur candidate has exceeded everyone's expectations so far, despite having a skeleton staff, weak fundraising, and no idea what he's doing.
Even now, Trump's candidacy may seem like the punch-line to a bad joke, but as his nominating convention got underway, he only trailed Hillary Clinton by a few points nationally.
But many have wondered whether or not there's a point at which Trump's amateurishness and inability to oversee a functioning operation start to catch up with him. As of this morning, it's not unreasonable to think that point is now.
Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.
* As if the first day of the Republican National Convention weren't messy enough last night, note that many party activists tried to force a roll call on party rules, only to find their efforts crushed by party leaders. They weren't pleased.
* The latest Monmouth University poll, released yesterday, showed Hillary Clinton leading Donald Trump nationally by only two points among likely voters, 45% to 43%, with third-party candidates in the mix.
* Ted Cruz, John Kasich, and Marco Rubio built up sizable voter lists during their respective presidential campaigns, and as of this week, not one of them has turned over his list to the Republican Party to help with the 2016 effort.
* In the spring, Republican consultant Brian Seitchik said Trump's candidacy could prove "disastrous" to the GOP's down-ballot candidates. This week, Brian Seitchik became the Trump campaign's new state director in Arizona.
* The Tampa Bay Times put together an interesting report that found Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) missed "20 of 23 classified Intelligence Committee meetings" between October 2015 and March 2016, despite the senator publicly insisting in the fall, "We do all the intelligence briefings."
* Former President George W. Bush recently spoke to a group of former officials from his administration who gathered for a social event in Dallas. According to Politico, Bush told attendees, "I'm worried that I will be the last Republican president."
At any major party's national convention, partisans aren't going to use kid gloves when going after the other party's nominee. It stands to reason that when Republicans target Hillary Clinton in Cleveland this week, they're going to use every possible line of attack they can think of. It's just how the game is played.
But Vox's Andrew Prokop picked up on GOP messaging from the first night of the Republican National Convention that goes much further than anything Americans are accustomed to.
One of the most striking recurring suggestions of the Republican convention's first day was that Hillary Clinton should be sent to prison.
During retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn's speech, the delegates began to chant, "Lock her up! Lock her up! Lock her up!" Soon, Flynn agreed, saying, "Lock her up, that's right! It's unbelievable!"
After noting some other speakers who called for Clinton's imprisonment, Prokop's piece added, "To me, all this seemed like a new crossing of a line and an ugly degradation of a norm in American politics."
He's not the only who thought so. Independent Journal Review's Justin Green, a conservative journalist, added, "Plagiarism is bad, but it's remarkable that the headline news today isn't that speakers at the RNC called for jailing the opposing nominee."
It's no small detail. In the American tradition, partisans will blast rivals on every front, but voters are not accustomed to hearing calls for the incarceration of the other party's presidential candidate.
This year, in other words, radicalized Republicans are breaking new ground in ways the American mainstream should find alarming.
Obviously, the story of the morning is the controversy surrounding Melania Trump plagiarizing Michelle Obama in her convention speech, which creates an interesting test for Donald Trump's presidential campaign. A professional operation knows how to deal with incidents like these effectively,
Paul Manafort responded to the controversy on CNN on Tuesday morning, saying "there is no cribbing of Michelle Obama's speech."
"These were common words and values, and she cares about her family," Manafort said.
In case this weren't quite bonkers enough, Manafort, Trump's campaign chairman, added, "This is, once again, an example of when a woman threatens Hillary Clinton, how she seeks out to demean her and take her down."
Yes, Melania Trump's speech lifted whole sentences from Michelle Obama without attribution, but in Trump Land, (a) reality has no meaning; and (b) this is all Hillary Clinton's fault. Say hello to the party of personal responsibility.
I especially love the assertion that Melania Trump used "common words." Well, sure, I suppose the individual words are themselves "common," but in spoken languages, the order in which words appear matters -- and in this case, the candidate's wife used whole phrases that had been previously used by someone else.
Unless Paul Manafort is doing his best Baghdad Bob imitation, he may need to come up with some other line of defense.
Rabbi Haskel Lookstein, who leads a congregation that includes Ivanka Trump and her family, had been scheduled to deliver the opening prayer at the Republican National Convention. As the New York Timesreported, however, late last week, he bowed out.
"The whole matter turned from rabbinic to political, something which was never intended," Lookstein said in a statement. "In the interest of bringing our community together, I have asked to be relieved of my commitment to deliver the invocation."
He was replaced with Pastor Mark Burns, who frequently appears with Donald Trump, and who told Bloomberg Politics he would focus on "coming together as a nation." Burns added a few days ago, "I will be talking about unity and love. We must not be focused on our divisions. We are one people."
Sounds great. So, how'd that turn out? The Huffington Postreported:
Mark Burns, a pastor from South Carolina, on Monday delivered perhaps the most politically charged benediction ever heard at a national convention.
Burns warned the prayerful delegates at the Republican National Convention that "our enemy is not other Republicans, but is Hillary Clinton and the Democratic Party."
"Let's pray together," he said, before denouncing again "the liberal Democratic party."
Note, plenty of speeches at the Republican National Convention included rhetoric like this. It is, after all, the Republican National Convention. We should expect biting, partisan attacks.
But this was a pastor delivering the benediction. The guy had just promised not to "focus on our divisions," shortly before describing Americans from the other political party as his "enemy."
Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) is no stranger to racial controversies, but his appearance on MSNBC yesterday afternoon managed to even surprise his critics.
Defending his party's reputation of consisting mainly of "old, white people," Republican Rep. Steve King of Iowa on Monday questioned where "any other subgroup of people" contributed more to society than in Western civilization.
"This 'old, white people' business does get a little tired," King said on MSNBC Monday, hours before the first speaker would take the stage at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. "I'd ask you to go back through history and figure out, where are these contributions that have been made by these other categories of people that you're talking about -- where did any other subgroup of people contribute more to civilization?"
When MSNBC's Chris Hayes, taken aback, asked, "Than white people?" the right-wing congressman kept going, adding that he believes the greatest contributions of civilization have come from "Western Europe, Eastern Europe and the Unites States of America and every place where the footprint of Christianity settled the world."
Just so we're clear, the Republican Party has a demographic problem: in a country of increasing racial and ethnic diversity, the GOP relies overwhelmingly on older, white voters. Asked to reflect on his party's challenge, Steve King told a national television audience that white people are awesome.
In fact, as far as the Republican congressman is concerned, there's nothing wrong with ranking groups of people and then determining which one reigns supreme based on their contributions to civilization.
I've been watching major-party conventions for a long time. This was probably the lowest point a party has reached in my lifetime.
The mother of an American killed in the 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya, said she personally blames Hillary Clinton for her son's death.
"She deserves to be in stripes," [Pat] Smith said of Clinton.... "I personally blame Hillary Clinton for the death of my son," Smith said while fighting back tears.
The convention soon after turned over the stage to two veterans who proceeded to blatantly lie about assorted Benghazi conspiracy theories -- each of which contradicted the findings of the Republicans' own investigations.
It was a spectacle so offensive, it was hard to even comprehend. Obviously, basic human decency requires sympathy for Pat Smith, Benghazi victim Sean Smith's mother, who's had to endure the kind of pain few of us can imagine. That doesn't change the fact, however, that her claims last night simply weren't true. We know her arguments defy reality because Republicans launched multiple probes of the 2012 Benghazi attack -- no event in American history has received more congressional scrutiny -- and have concluded that the conspiracy theories are wrong.
GOP officials searched desperately for many years to uncover any kind of evidence to bolster their beliefs and partisan attacks. They found nothing. So why put a grieving mother on the convention stage to say things that are obviously wrong? Because the party's rabid base needed some red meat to chew on?
NBC News' Richard Engel explained on the air last night that the Republican convention appears to have offered "a manipulation of someone's grief," which meant "going to a very dark place."
And therein lies the larger point. Modern, major political parties, hoping to govern in a global superpower, probably shouldn't choose to deliberately take their televised national convention to "a very dark place."
At first blush, the strangest thing about Melania Trump's speech at the Republican National Convention last night might have been her introduction. Donald Trump, standing in silhouette, with "We Are the Champions" playing in the background, created a spectacle that transformed the RNC stage into a WWE-style appearance. It was ... odd.
But this was soon overshadowed by the fact that the possible future First Lady blatantly plagiarized the current First Lady in her remarks.
A chunk of Melania Trump's Republican National Convention speech appears to have been lifted from Michelle Obama's address at the 2008 Democratic convention. [...]
A two-paragraph section of Trump's speech about family values bears nearly identical phrasing to Obama's 2008 address, which was seen as a breakout moment for the future first lady and a humanizing moment for her husband.
We're not talking about a few words here and there that seemed similar; Melania Trump's speech took whole sentences, at times word for word, from Michelle Obama's speech eight years ago. There's no ambiguity about the theft. (You can even play both simultaneously, and it works surprisingly well.)
And while it seems safe to assume that Trump did not write her own remarks, it doesn't help that she told NBC's Matt Lauer yesterday, in reference to the speech, "I read once over it, and that's all. Because I wrote it ... with as little help as possible."
After journalists began noticing the problem and looking for some kind of explanation, Donald Trump's campaign team issued a statement that was almost as baffling as the plagiarism itself: "In writing her beautiful speech, Melania's team of writers took notes on her life's inspirations, and in some instances included fragments that reflected her own thinking. Melania's immigrant experience and love for America shone through in her speech, which made it such a success."
How this is supposed to address the underlying controversy is a mystery.
An MSNBC panel discusses the likely repercussions and political fallout from the revelation that parts of Melania Trump's speech before the Republican National Convention match passages from Michelle Obama's speech to the Democratic National Convention in 2008. watch
Passages from Melania Trump's prime time speech at the Republican National Convention tonight bear a striking similarity to parts of Michelle Obama's speech at the Democratic National Convention in 2008. watch
Utah delegate Kera Birkeland tells Jacob Soboroff about being confronted at the Republican National Convention by two Trump supporters because the Utah delegation supported a roll call vote on the party rules. watch
Paul Rieckhoff, founder and CEO of Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans for America, talks about the politicization of veterans' issues and what veterans actually need from politicians who claim to support veterans. watch
Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.