It's become something of a fad among conservative policymakers: what the country really needs is drug testing for low-income Americans who rely on the social safety net. This week, as the NBC affiliate in Huntington reported, the policy reached West Virginia.
Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin has approved a drug-testing proposal for some West Virginia welfare applicants.
The Democratic governor signed off Wednesday on the three-year statewide drug-testing pilot program for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program applicants. The Republican-led Legislature passed it.
The way the policy is structured, caseworkers will be responsible for determining which welfare applicants trigger a "reasonable suspicion" of drug use. Failing a test once will require substance-abuse treatment; failing a test more than once will cost applicants' benefits.
One proponent of the measure, Republican Delegate Scott Cadle, argued during the legislative debate, “I expect people who live off my tax money to be drug tested."
Except, strictly speaking, that's not quite true. West Virginia has plenty of government contractors who receive public funding, and they won't be drug testing. More to the point, state employees -- including elected members of the state legislature -- also "live off" their taxpayer-financed salaries, but they won't be subjected to drug testing, either.
After this week's deadly terrorist attack in Brussels, Republicans are certain President Obama should go somewhere. They just aren't sure where.
Ted Cruz, for example, declared at a press conference, "President Obama should be back in America keeping this country safe, or President Obama should be planning to travel to Brussels." The Texas senator didn't have any specific rationale for such a challenge, probably because his rhetoric didn't make a lot of sense. Whether or not the president cut short his overseas trip would have no bearing on Americans' security, and the last thing Brussels needs right now is the added burden of preparing security precautions for an Obama visit.
But as TPM noted yesterday, Gov. Rick Scott (R) has an entirely different itinerary in mind for the president: what Obama really ought to do in the wake of terrorism in Brussels is go to ... Florida.
Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) thinks the best way for President Barack Obama to address the concerns of Americans troubled by Tuesday's deadly terrorist attacks in Brussels is to head to the Sunshine State.
"Not only do I believe that President Obama should immediately return to America, I am inviting him today to come to Florida and address the concerns of American tourists considering travel to Europe," Scott said in a statement released Thursday.
I've read the governor's press release a few times, trying to make sense of it, but I have no idea what Scott's talking about. Apparently, the Florida Republican is worried about European tourism suffering in the aftermath of an attack, so Scott wants the president to visit Florida to reassure Americans who are considering trips across the Atlantic.
Perhaps the governor was searching for a new way to complain about Obama, and this was the best he could come up with?
The arithmetic on the Senate Republicans' Supreme Court blockade certainly leans in the party's favor. The GOP conference has a 54-member majority. If there's a filibuster against Judge Merrick Garland, as seems likely, he would need 60 votes to have a chance at confirmation.
Are there 14 Republican senators who might break ranks and join with 46 Democrats to advance Garland's nomination? Objectively, it's difficult to imagine such circumstances -- so long as the far-right GOP conference sticks together, linking arms on a gambit never before tried in American history, odds are Republicans will succeed in blocking the same Supreme Court nominee some GOP senators urged President Obama to choose.
But as the process continues to unfold, there's at least some evidence that Republicans are not yet united. The Washington Postreported yesterday:
A third Republican senator broke with party leadership this week to say that Supreme Court nominee Merrick B. Garland ought to be granted hearings, according to a news report.
The Garden City Telegram reported that Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) told a small group gathered in a Cimarron, Kan., courthouse on Monday that GOP senators "should interview Garland and have a hearing on his nomination," in the paper's words.
According to the local report, Moran said he expects to oppose Garland's nomination, but the senator nevertheless believes "the process ought to go forward." In a separate local report, the Kansas Republican was also quoted saying, "I think we have the responsibility to have a hearing, to have the conversation and to make a determination on the merit."
Before yesterday, only Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) had endorsed confirmation hearings for Garland. Moran, a former chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee who also happens to be up for re-election this year, has joined a very small club.
Senator Amy Klobuchar talks with Steve Kornacki about the partisan past that led to the current rancor over President Obama's Supreme Court nomination and the unprecedented level of obstruction Republicans have reached. watch
Matea Gold, national political reporter for The Washington Post, talks with Steve Kornacki about Republican donors rallying to protect Republicans in Congress from any political damage that may come from Donald Trump's new role as the party's standard bearer. watch
Steve Kornacki reports on the continued outrage over long wait times to vote in Arizona's primary, particularly in Maricopa County, with new calls for a federal investigation and new legislation filed to ensure it doesn't happen again. watch
Robert Costa, national political reporter for The Washington Post, talks with Steve Kornacki about Donald Trump's path to the Republican nomination and the strategies of his opponents to beat him. watch
Mary Spicuzza, politics reporter for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, talks with Steve Kornacki about Wisconsin's role as the next major primary prize, the anti-Trump effort to stop the GOP front runner's steady advance, and the Sanders campaign's need for watch
* News from the FBI: "Seven Iranian computer experts linked to the government in Tehran were charged Thursday with cyber attacks against American banks and a dam in New York."
* Brussels bombing: "Belgium's justice and interior ministers acknowledged Thursday that the authorities had erred by not acting on Turkey's request last year that they take custody of a Belgian citizen arrested for suspected terrorist activity. The man was one of the Islamic State suicide bombers in the devastating Brussels attacks."
* Related news: "The two brothers named as the suicide bombers at the center of the Brussels airport and metro attacks this week were listed as a potential terror threat in U.S. databases, NBC News has learned. According to two U.S. officials, Khalid and Ibrahim El Bakraoui were known to U.S. counter terrorism authorities prior to Tuesday morning."
* ISIS losing ground: "As European governments scramble to contain the expanding terrorist threat posed by the Islamic State, on the battlefield in Iraq and Syria the group is a rapidly diminishing force."
* This may not be a sustainable posture: "Striking a defiant tone as scandals engulf her government, President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil insisted in an interview on Thursday that she would not resign, even as momentum builds in Congress for her ouster."
* Radovan Karadzic: "A former Bosnian Serb leader was found guilty of genocide and other charges on Thursday for his role in deadly campaigns during the Bosnian war in the 1990s, including the massacres of thousands in Srebrenica, as an international tribunal announced a long-awaited reckoning in Europe's bloodiest chapter since World War II."
Ordinarily, the most interesting thing about an election day is the results showing who won and who lost. But this week, with many watching the Arizona primary closely, the big surprise had nothing to do with the vote tallies and everything to do with the voting lines.
MSNBC's Zach Roth reported that some Arizonans were forced to wait as long as five hours to cast a primary ballot.
Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, called the long lines in Maricopa County "unacceptable," adding: "Our election officials must evaluate what went wrong and how they make sure it doesn't happen again." An editorial in the Arizona Republic called the lines "shameful."
Some voters in downtown Phoenix reportedly waited until after midnight to cast a ballot, after standing in line since before 7 p.m. A bipartisan presidential panel said in a 2014 report that voters shouldn't have to wait more than half an hour.
In theory, someone might generously suggest this is the result of stronger-than-expected voter interest. Maybe, the argument goes, Arizonans were so engaged in both parties' competitive contests that they showed up in droves and completely overwhelmed the system.
Except, that's not what actually happened. Turnout was strong, but it wasn't that strong.
So what created this fiasco? As it turns out, Arizona can blame, at least in part, the five conservatives on the U.S. Supreme Court.
A year ago at this time, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R) and his state's Republican-led legislature sparked a national controversy when it approved a right-to-discriminate measure, intended to empower workers to cite religious objections to deny services to the public. Initially, GOP officials weren't especially concerned about criticisms from the left.
But Indiana's state government changed direction when prominent businesses and private-sector leaders said they would start avoiding the state unless Indiana changed course. Pence did exactly that soon after.
A year later, Georgia's Republican-led state government is moving forward with a related "religious liberty" measure. The Washington Postreported this week reported that the Human Rights Campaign urged the entertainment industry to threaten to withhold business from Georgia if the bill becomes law. Varietyreported yesterday that one Hollywood giant agreed (via Ron Chusid):
The Walt Disney Co. and Marvel Studios indicated opposition to a Georgia religious liberty bill pending before Gov. Nathan Deal, saying that they will take their business elsewhere "should any legislation allowing discriminatory practices be signed into state law."
With generous tax incentives, Georgia has become a production hub, with Marvel currently shooting "Guardians of the Galaxy 2" at Pinewood Studios outside Atlanta. "Captain America: Civil War" shot there last summer.
A company spokesperson said yesterday, "Disney and Marvel are inclusive companies, and although we have had great experiences filming in Georgia, we will plan to take our business elsewhere should any legislation allowing discriminatory practices be signed into state law."
They join other major corporations headquartered in the state -- Coca-Cola, Home Depot, UPS, and Cox Enterprises -- in opposing the bill. AMC Networks, which films "The Walking Dead" in Georgia, also called for the state to reject the proposal. High-profile corporations from outside the state, including Apple, have joined the call.
Complicating matters further, the National Football League suggested "that such a law in Georgia could affect Atlanta's attempts" to host an upcoming Super Bowl.
Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.
* The next primary on the Republican calendar is Wisconsin, which hosts its contest on April 5. An Emerson College poll released yesterday found a very competitive GOP race, with Ted Cruz narrowly leading Donald Trump, 36% to 35%. John Kasich is further back with 19%.
* That same poll found Hillary Clinton with a modest lead over Bernie Sanders among Wisconsin Democrats, 50% to 44%.
* Speaking of Wisconsin, Gov. Scott Walker (R) hasn't formally endorsed any of his former presidential rivals yet, but he made his intentions clear yesterday. "Ted Cruz is the only one who's got a chance other than Donald Trump to win the nomination," Walker said.
* Clinton delivered a speech yesterday at Stanford University on her national security strategy as it relates to ISIS. It represented quite a contrast from what the public heard from the leading Republican candidates the day before.
* Pennsylvania will host a critically important primary in late April, and a new Franklin & Marshall poll shows a tight GOP race. Trump leads Kasich in the survey, 33% to 30%, with Cruz third with 20%.
* The same poll showed Clinton with a big advantage, at least for now, over Sanders among Pennsylvania Democrats, 53% to 28%.
Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.