Aisha Turner, producer of the 'Precious Lives' radio series about gun violence and young people in Milwaukee, talks with Rachel Maddow about the context of the racial protests taking place in Milwaukee. watch
Michael McFaul, former U.S. ambassador to Russia, talks with Rachel Maddow about whether Donald Trump's campaign chairman Paul Manafort should be required to disclose the details of his employment with Ukraine's Russia-backed former president. watch
Rachel Maddow relays new reporting from the New York Times about Ukrainian investigations into Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort's recent employment with Ukraine's Russia-backed former president. watch
Rachel Maddow reports on Vice President Joe Biden offering vehement criticism of Donald Trump's qualifications to be president, particularly on foreign policy and his positions on Russia and NATO. watch
* Louisiana's flooding crisis continues: "Louisiana has been deluged by rainfall since last week, with at least seven people dead and thousands of homes damaged by floods. Gov. John Bel Edwards said officials 'won't know the death toll for sure for several more days.' President Barack Obama signed a disaster declaration for the state Sunday, freeing up federal aid to support recovery efforts."
* A different kind of crisis in Wisconsin: "The mayor of Milwaukee imposed a 10 p.m. Monday curfew for teenagers after the city was rocked by a second straight night of violent street protests over the fatal police shooting of a local man."
* NYC: "Police were questioning a suspect early Monday in the brazen broad-daylight killings over the weekend of a local imam and his assistant in New York City, sources told NBC News. The man, who police say matched a description of the shooter, was detained while returning to a vehicle near the scene of the killings, the sources said."
* Syria: "U.S.-backed fighters have liberated the Syrian town of Manbij from ISIS, observers and Syrian-Kurdish officials said Saturday as dazed residents reportedly described their terror at the hands of militants."
* ISIS: "The leader of the Islamic State branch that operates in Afghanistan and Pakistan was killed in an American airstrike on July 26 in eastern Afghanistan, the Pentagon said Friday. It was the United States military's second killing of an anti-American Islamist militant leader in the region in the past three months."
* Socialism: "U.S. stocks hit record highs on Monday as traders remained buoyant and oil prices ticked upward."
* Regulations can make quite a difference: "While the earth continues to shudder more frequently than seven years ago beneath Oklahomans feet, the rate of earthquakes in the state in 2016 is down from last year.... Increased regulation on wastewater disposal related to oil and gas extraction could be one reason behind the decline, said Robert Williams, a geophysicist at the United States Geological Survey."
In early January 2010, Rudy Giuliani, known for his obsessive focus on the 9/11 attacks, made a bizarre comment on ABC's "Good Morning America." The former mayor argued, "What [President Obama] should be doing is following the right things that [George W. Bush] did -- one of the right things he did was treat this as a war on terror."
Giuliani added, "We had no domestic attacks under Bush. We've had one under Obama."
Of course, we had a very memorable domestic attack under Bush. The "one" under Obama, in this case, apparently referred to "Underwear Bomber" Umar Abdulmutallab, who attempted to detonate a concealed explosive on a flight from Amsterdam to Detroit, but who failed. This "attack," fortunately, led to zero casualties.
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani on Monday said terrorists failed to successfully strike the United States in the eight years before President Obama and former secretary of State Hillary Clinton took office.
"Under those eight years, before Obama came along, we didn't have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack in the United States," Giuliani said Monday ahead of a speech by Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump on foreign policy. "They all started when Clinton and Obama got into office."
Context, of course, is everything. If you watch this clip, note that Giuliani was praising Republican vice presidential hopeful Mike Pence, and appeared to refer to a period after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
I'm not sure, however, how much that helps Giuliani's case.
The connections between Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Vladimir Putin's government in Russia have raised far more questions than have been answered. From Trump's evasive rhetoric about his relationship with the autocratic leader, to the Trump campaign's efforts to change his party's platform to boost Putin's position, to Trump's antipathy towards the NATO alliance, the Republicans' 2016 nominee is the most pro-Russia candidate Americans have seen in generations.
But perhaps most striking of all is the degree to which Trump has surrounded himself with a team of advisers, led by lobbyist Paul Manafort, whose alliances with Putin's regime create the basis for an ongoing controversy. The latest New York Timesreport about Trump's campaign chairman is a doozy.
...Mr. Manafort's presence remains elsewhere here in the [Ukranian] capital, where government investigators examining secret records have found his name, as well as companies he sought business with, as they try to untangle a corrupt network they say was used to loot Ukrainian assets and influence elections during the administration of Mr. Manafort's main client, former President Viktor F. Yanukovych.
Handwritten ledgers show $12.7 million in undisclosed cash payments designated for Mr. Manafort from Mr. Yanukovych's pro-Russian political party from 2007 to 2012, according to Ukraine's newly formed National Anti-Corruption Bureau. Investigators assert that the disbursements were part of an illegal off-the-books system whose recipients also included election officials.
Manafort insistedthis morning that the Times' reporting is inaccurate.
While the questions linger, let's note that these new allegations don't exactly come out of the blue: Manafort's lobbying record is welldocumented, including his pro-Putin work.
Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.
* If you missed Friday night's show, note that the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist polls show Hillary Clinton with sizable leads over Donald Trump in Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, and Colorado.
* At a campaign event in Connecticut over the weekend, Trump said he's not running against Hillary Clinton, but rather, "I’m running against the crooked media."
* Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort told the AP, in reference to Trump, "For the last week or so, he’s been very focused and very much on his game.” Manafort did not appear to be kidding.
* An unflattering New York Timespiece over the weekend reported that Trump's advisers are, with increasing frequency, conceding that the Republican candidate "may be beyond coaching." The piece added, "In private, Mr. Trump’s mood is often sullen and erratic, his associates say. He veers from barking at members of his staff to grumbling about how he was better off following his own instincts during the primaries and suggesting he should not have heeded their calls for change."
* A new USA Today/Rock the Vote Poll found Clinton leading Trump, 56% to 20%, among voters under the age of 35.
* Trump had previously indicated his intention to compete in his home state of New York, but a new Siena Research Institute poll shows Clinton crushing the GOP nominee in the Empire State, 57% to 27%.
BuzzFeed published a pretty striking report over the weekend on Donald Trump's on-the-ground operation, noting in many key states, the Trump campaign hardly exists. In North Carolina, for example, no one seems to know where the campaign headquarters is located. In Florida, the campaign has been operating "a bare-bones operation, with one office in Sarasota and four staff."
The Republican nominee said late last week, "I don't know that we need to get out the vote." Evidently, he wasn't kidding.
But a closer look suggests Trump has some backup: his operation isn't taking issues like campaign infrastructure seriously, but the Republican National Committee is. In states where Team Trump is doing very little actual work, the RNC has a formidable on-the-ground operation, helping pick up the slack. In Florida, for example, BuzzFeed's report added that the RNC "currently has 75 staffers on the ground ... as well as 1,400 volunteers and fellows in charge of local organizing."
So, problem solved? Maybe, although there's an overarching problem: what happens if the Republican National Committee decides to give up on Trump? Politicoreported over the weekend that party leaders, "at the highest levels," have starting talking privately about "cutting off support to Trump in October and redirecting cash to save endangered congressional majorities."
According to sources close to [RNC Chairman Reince] Priebus, the chairman has warned that if Trump does not better heed this persistent advice to avoid dustups driven by his rhetoric, the RNC might not be able to help him as much -- suggesting that money and ground resources might be diverted.
To this point, [Sean Spicer, the RNC's top strategist] has suggested a mid-October deadline for turning around the presidential campaign, suggesting last week to reporters and in separate discussions with GOP operatives that it would cause serious concern inside the RNC if Trump were to remain in a weakened position by then.
Operatives close to the RNC leadership who have heard this argument from party leadership, say the committee might have to make a decision about pulling the plug on Trump before that.
Slateadded, "Word of cutting off Trump comes days after news that more than 70 high-profile Republicans signed an open letter calling on RNC Chairman Reince Priebus to stop funding Trump and use the money for Senate and House races instead."
Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.