The Rachel Maddow Show Weekdays at 9PM

Rachel Maddow StoriesRSS

select from:

E.g., 8/4/2015
E.g., 8/4/2015
U.S. Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump listens to a question at the Family Leadership Summit in Ames, Ia., July 18, 2015. (Photo by Jim Young/Reuters)

'Repeal and replace with something terrific'

07/30/15 08:00AM

Despite fresh evidence that the Affordable Care Act is working very well, the Republican repeal crusade hasn't quit. GOP lawmakers continue to explore new ways to gut the American health care system, and Republican presidential candidates, just as a matter of course, talk openly about their plans to kill the successful and effective law.
The GOP's principal problem, however, hasn't changed: Republicans know they hate "Obamacare" for reasons they can't fully explain, but as has been the case for over five years, the party simply has no idea what to offer as an alternative.
Never fear, Donald Trump has it figured out. The leading Republican presidential hopeful sat down yesterday with CNN's Dana Bash, and according to the Nexis transcript, this was their exchange about health care:
BASH: So, you're in the Oval Office, you're saying Obamacare...
TRUMP: It's got to go.
BASH: It's got to go.
TRUMP: Repeal and replace with something terrific.
Oh, something terrific. Why didn't Republicans just say so? I was concerned they might try to replace the ACA with something wholly inadequate, but if the plan will be "something terrific" -- no doubt, it'll be classy, too -- then American families obviously have no reason to worry about Republicans taking their health care benefits away.
All joking aside, when Bash asked Trump to elaborate a bit on what "terrific" plan he has in mind, the GOP candidate added that the system will depend on "private companies" that will do great with "competition."
It's easy to laugh at this, but let's not lose sight of the larger context: Trump's six-word health care plan -- "repeal and replace with something terrific" -- is every bit as specific as the health care plan outlined by GOP leaders on Capitol Hill.
Indeed, what makes Trump's comment especially amusing is its broad applicability in describing Republicans' approach to policymaking.

Accused cop's lawyer speaks and other headlines

07/30/15 07:55AM

Indicted cop's attorney: murder charge 'absolutely unwarranted.' (Cincinnati Enquirer)

New Hampshire voters explain the appeal of Donald Trump. (Bloomberg Politics)

And then there were 17: Jim Gilmore files his presidential-run paperwork. (AP)

'Dark money': ALEC wants image makeover. (Politico)

Jailed Alabama woman drops abortion lawsuit, says she wants to be a mother. (

Meet the 3 GOP women leading the charge to defund Planned Parenthood. (Washington Post)

Charles Koch calls on fellow conservative donors 'to raise our efforts to a new level.' (Washington Post)

read more

Democratic primary increasingly interesting

Democratic primary more interesting by the day

07/29/15 09:28PM

Rachel Maddow reports on Hillary Clinton's expected call for an end to the embargo on Cuba, and Bernie Sanders rallying 100,000 grassroots supporters, and both candidates perform well in head-to-head polling against potential Republican opponents. watch

Wednesday's Mini-Report, 7.29.15

07/29/15 05:30PM

Today's edition of quick hits:
* A murder charge in Ohio: "A University of Cincinnati officer was indicted for murder Wednesday for fatally shooting an unarmed black man in the head following a routine traffic stop earlier this month.  A Cincinnati grand jury has decided to indict University of Cincinnati police officer Ray Tensing in the July 19 death of 43-year-old Samuel DuBose, who was pulled over for not having a front license plate on his car."
* There's skepticism because we've seen reports like these before: "The Taliban's longtime leader Mullah Omar was dead, the Afghan government announced Wednesday after a day of feverish speculation. 'I can confirm that Mullah Omar is dead,' the spokesman for Afghanistan's National Directorate of Security Abdul Hassib Sediqi told NBC News."
* Economy: "The Federal Reserve offered a slightly more upbeat assessment of the economy Wednesday but provided little insight into when it will raise its benchmark interest rate for the first time in nearly a decade."
* EPA: "The Obama administration has decided to give states more time to comply with proposed regulations that will require dramatic cuts in greenhouse-gas pollution from power plants, people familiar with the plans said Tuesday."
* GOP in disarray: "House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) brushed off a challenge to his leadership from Rep. Mark Meadows (R., N.C.) on Wednesday, but not without showing some irritation."
* He doesn't have much of a choice: "President Obama would sign a three-month highway funding bill, the White House said Wednesday, though it ripped Republicans in Congress for failing to agree on a long-term solution."
Republican presidential hopeful U.S. Sen.Ted Cruz, R-Texas, speaks at the Republican Leadership Summit on April 18, 2015, in Nashua, N.H.

The Senate EMP Caucus takes shape

07/29/15 04:36PM

Last week, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee tried to hold a hearing on the international nuclear agreement with Iran, but the discussion wasn't especially fruitful. It was clear the hearing, such as it was, was pretty far off track when Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) asked Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, "Do you know what EMP is?"
Today, evidently, it was Sen. Ted Cruz's turn.
CRUZ: Secretary Moniz, I want to turn to a different question. The single greatest threat to the United States if Iran acquires a nuclear weapon is an Electromagnetic Pulse. A nuclear weapon detonated in the atmosphere over the Eastern seaboard could kill tens of millions of Americans. On July 23rd in testimony before Congress, you told the United States Senate you hadn't read the Congressionally mandated Commission on EMPs and that you didn't know what an EMP was.
MONIZ: That is incorrect. I said I did not know this 2008 report recommendations. I said I was quite familiar with the issue. And we all know about EMPs from airburst nuclear weapons.
The right-wing Texan, apparently competing in some imaginary competition to become America's Most Obnoxious Politician, said it was "stunning" to him that Moniz doesn't know what an EMP is.
The Energy Secretary, who also happens to be a nuclear physicist and longtime MIT professor, tried to explain to Cruz, "Of course I know about the issue. I happen to know something about nuclear weapons; I know about EMPs; I know about various...."
Cruz, growing impatient, insisted that an EMP "could kill tens of millions of Americans" and demanded to know whether Moniz considered that possible. The cabinet secretary -- who earned a PhD in theoretical physics from Stanford and is considered one of the top nuclear physicists in the country -- responded by noting the importance of specifics.
The GOP senator quickly grew agitated and whined about Moniz "refusing to answer the question."
Lindsey Graham (Photo by Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty)

'Who wins the war between us and Iran?'

07/29/15 02:39PM

The Senate Armed Services Committee held its own hearing today on the international nuclear agreement with Iran, which regrettably went about as well as the other congressional hearings on the issue. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a Republican presidential candidate and one of his party's most unyielding hawks, got especially animated during an exchange with Defense Secretary Ashton Carter:
GRAHAM: Could we win a war with Iran? Who wins the war between us and Iran? Who wins? Do you have any doubt who wins?
CARTER: No, the United States...
GRAHAM: We win!
The senator seemed pleased with himself, though this doesn't exactly help the Republican cause. For proponents of the agreement, the concern has long been that GOP lawmakers want to kill the diplomatic deal because they want a military confrontation with Iran. Republicans usually make a point to deny this, instead saying they prefer a "better" diplomatic solution.
Graham, however, is less subtle -- his line of questioning suggested the United States would win a war, which makes war an appealing alternative.
The administration's cabinet secretaries seemed visibly irritated with Graham's grandstanding, and they didn't make much of an effort to debate the South Carolina senator, but I would have enjoyed some additional debate on this. It's true, of course, that in a conventional conflict that pits the U.S. military against the Iranian military, the latter wouldn't stand much of a chance.
And while that may be the end of the conversation for Graham, responsible policymakers have to wonder: "win" at what cost? What are the security implications of the U.S. launching yet another Middle Eastern war? How long would the war last and with how many casualties? What happens after our "victory"?
"Do you have any doubt who wins?" No. Does Graham have any doubt that such a war would be incredibly costly?
Rep. Chaka Fattah, speaks as House Democrats hold a news conference to call for presidential action on immigration on Nov. 13, 2014. (Photo by Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Getty).

Dem congressman faces 29-count indictment

07/29/15 12:42PM

For criminal-defense attorneys who specialize in Congress, 2015 has turned into quite a year.
First, Rep. Michael Grimm (R-N.Y.) was indicted and convicted. Two months later, Rep. Aaron Schock (R-Ill.), facing an investigation, was forced to resign. A month after that, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) was indicted. A month after that, former House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) was indicted.
Today, the NBC affiliate in Philadelphia reports on the latest addition to the growing list.
A longtime Philadelphia congressman was indicted Wednesday in a racketeering case stemming from the alleged misappropriation of hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal, charitable and campaign funds after his failed 2007 run for mayor.
Democratic U.S. Rep. Chaka Fattah, 58, and four associates were charged with bribery; conspiracy to commit wire, honest services, bank and mail fraud; money laundering and other charges.
Fattah, who has been the subject of a federal investigation for quite a while, told reporters this morning, "We have not received the indictment. I just talked to my attorney in Philadelphia and we have not had the chance to review it, but I did hear a little bit about it and all I want to say is that I’ve spent my time helping people." The Pennsylvania Democrat added that he's "going to let my attorney -- a small one-man shop in Philadelphia -- handle this matter."
A Roll Call report added some additional context to the allegations:

Wednesday's Campaign Round-Up, 7.29.15

07/29/15 12:00PM

Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.
* Fox News has tweaked its debate rules a bit, and now the bottom six Republican presidential candidates will be guaranteed a spot at the "kids' table" event next week. Under the previous rules, candidates below 1% risked exclusion.
* What's Hillary Clinton's position on the Keystone XL oil pipeline? For now, the Democratic frontrunner really doesn't want to talk about it.
* In the new CNN poll, President Obama's approval rating is up to 49%, which is of great interest to campaign insiders in both parties -- the more popular the president is, the less appetite there may be next year for sweeping national changes.
* In Illinois, new results from Public Policy Polling shows Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D) leading incumbent Sen. Mark Kirk (R) by six, 42% to 36%. 
* On a related note, one of the Illinois GOP's premier fundraisers is calling on Kirk to drop out of the race so the party can nominate a more competitive statewide candidate.
* And speaking of Illinois, PPP also found Scott Walker leading Donald Trump among GOP voters in the state, 23% to 18%. At 11%, Jeb Bush is the only other candidate to reach double digits.
* After a Monmouth poll found Chris Christie running eighth in New Hampshire with just 4% support, the New Jersey governor said the poll is biased against him. (Other recent polling in the Granite State also shows Christie struggling.)
* Marco Rubio's absenteeism in the Senate is becoming a more notable problem. He's not just missing more votes than any other senator, including the other senators running for president, but he's also skipping private hearings and briefings on major issues.


About The Rachel Maddow Show

Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.

Rachel Maddow LIVE

Speak out! Make your voice heard by tagging your posts #maddow

  • Show
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Latest Book