The Rachel Maddow Show Weekdays at 9PM

Rachel Maddow StoriesRSS

select from:

E.g., 8/27/2015
E.g., 8/27/2015
U.S. Republican presidential candidate Mike Huckabee speaks in San Diego, Calif. (Photo by Mike Blake/Reuters).

Testing the limits of Huckabee's culture-war vision

08/17/15 10:43AM

Late last week, an 11-year-old girl in Paraguay gave birth to a baby under horrific circumstances: she was allegedly raped and impregnated by her stepfather. Under the nation's harsh anti-abortion laws, terminating that pregnancy -- which occurred when the girl was just 10 -- was prohibited.
Perhaps, given these details, the government shouldn't have forced her to take the pregnancy to term? According to Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee, officials in Paraguay made the right call.
Gov. Mike Huckabee on Sunday put his support behind the decision to deny an abortion to a 10-year-old girl in Paraguay who was raped by her step-father, saying the while what happened was a "terrible tragedy," it is best not to "compound the tragedy by taking another life."
The GOP presidential candidate, who has been firmly against abortion no matter the circumstance -- including rape, incest or a woman's life endangerment -- touted his consistency in his defense and used a sort of "two wrongs don't make a right" argument.
The far-right candidate conceded, "There are no easy answers here." But in the next breath, Huckabee suggested the answer is quite easy, indeed: "I just come down on the side that life is precious, every life has worth and value."
If that means the government forcing a 10-year-old to give birth following a suspected rape, so be it. (The unnamed girl had a cesarean last week.)
Of course, we're not just talking about one GOP presidential candidate out of 17 with a controversial position on abortion. Huckabee's position matters in large part because of how common it is.
Ohio Governor John Kasich speaks during the "Road to Majority" conference June 19, 2015 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty)

Kasich would reject 10-to-1 budget deal

08/17/15 10:01AM

It was four years ago last week when the eight Republican presidential candidates participated in a debate and were asked an important question: Fox's Bret Baier asked the Republican field whether the candidates would accept a debt-reduction deal in which they received $10 in spending cuts for every $1 in tax increases.
Not one of the candidates raised their hand -- a reaction that drew raucous applause from the GOP audience in attendance. It was a striking display, highlighting Republican hostility to compromise, even when a proposed deal is stacked ridiculously in their favor.
The whole incident, lasting only about 26 seconds, quickly became emblematic of GOP radicalism and inflexibility. Anyone who's the least bit curious about why constructive, bipartisan policymaking is impossible need only watch the clip.
Four years later, Jeb Bush, who used to support a 10-to-1 deal in Republicans' favor, has since changed his mind and would reject such an offer. On CBS's "Face the Nation," host John Dickerson asked Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R) yesterday whether he'd take the same deal.
DICKERSON: So, you balanced the budget the last time it was balanced in Washington. You say you want to bring folks together. In the last campaign, all the Republican candidates were asked a question. And they were asked, would you accept $1 in tax increases for $10 in spending reductions? And not a single Republican said they would take that deal. Democrats say they want some kind of tax increases. Would you take that deal?
KASICH: John, I wouldn't at this point, because when we were in our fighting with the Clinton administration and actually went through a government shutdown, we cut taxes, which allowed economy to grow.... What we learn is that, no, no, if the government takes more, they will spend it.
It's almost amusing how wrong this is.
Republican presidential candidates take the stage for the first Republican presidential debate at the Quicken Loans Arena, Aug. 6, 2015, in Cleveland. (Photo by John Minchillo/AP)

New national polling points to GOP surprises

08/17/15 09:20AM

It's been 11 days since the first debate for Republican presidential candidates, but we haven't seen much in the way of traditional national polling from major news organizations. Did the widely seen event change the state of the GOP race? And if so, how?
A new Fox News poll was released yesterday, and the results were not altogether expected:
1. Donald Trump: 25% (down one point from two weeks ago)
2. Ben Carson: 12% (up five points)
3. Ted Cruz: 10% (up four points)
4. Jeb Bush: 9% (down six points)
5. Mike Huckabee: 6% (unchanged)
5. Scott Walker: 6% (down three points)
7. Carly Fiorina: 5% (up three points)
8. John Kasich: 4% (up one point)
8. Marco Rubio: 4% (down one point)
10: Chris Christie: 3% (unchanged)
10. Rand Paul: 3% (down two points)
This is, of course, just one poll, so all of the usual caveats apply. But if the Fox poll's results accurately reflect the state of the race for GOP voters, the post-debate environment isn't exactly in line with the conventional wisdom.
Trump, for example, was supposed to have done real damage to himself with his confrontation with Fox's Megyn Kelly -- and yet he still leads the Republican pack, still enjoys more than double the support of his next closest rival, and still has more backing than Bush, Walker, and Rubio combined.
Rubio and Kasich won broad praise from pundits following the debate, but both are still below 5% nationally, and the Florida senator actually seems to have lost ground. On the other hand, Carson and Cruz, who seemed like non-factors in the debate, are suddenly surging.
Rand Paul, meanwhile, is seeing his support collapse quickly. As recently as April, a Fox News poll showed the Kentucky senator in third place, reaching double digits. Now, he's tied for 10th place.
But it's Jeb Bush's difficulties that stand out for me.
Republican presidential candidate Jeb Bush participates in a town hall at Turbocam International in Barrington, N.H., on Aug. 7, 2015. (Photo by Gretchen Ertl/Reuters)

Jeb Bush on foreign policy: his brother's keeper

08/17/15 08:40AM

When Jeb Bush's national campaign was in its earliest stages, the former governor and his team were well aware of the challenges associated with running as the brother of a failed, recent president. The task at hand was simple: come up with a way to carry the burden effectively.
Earlier this year, the preferred solution was a clumsy form of denial. Asked in February about some of former President George W. Bush's catastrophic decisions, Jeb Bush declared, "I won't talk about the past." Two months later, the Florida Republican was asked whether his brother made any mistakes at all in the area of foreign policy. "I'm not going to get into that," he replied.
It seemed like an unsustainable posture, and it was. Team Jeb needed a less-evasive, more-substantive strategy, which apparently meant throwing the "I am my own man" mantra out the window.
Last week, for example, the former governor tried -- and failed -- to blame the Iraq disaster on the Obama administration, as if his brother wasn't responsible for one of the most costly foreign-policy calamities in American history. Since then, as MSNBC's Benjy Sarlin helped document, Jeb's only made matters worse.
Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said that his brother's successful overthrow of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein "turned out to be a pretty good deal" on Thursday while speaking at the APPS National Security Forum in Davenport, Iowa.
Paul Waldman responded in a Washington Post piece, "The idea that removing Hussein 'turned out to be a pretty good deal' is so deranged that it boggles the mind. Imagine if his brother had said to the country in 2003, 'Let me offer you this deal: We'll take out Saddam, and it'll only cost us 4,000 American lives, tens of thousands more Americans gravely wounded in body and spirit, around $2 trillion, a worldwide surge in anti-Americanism, and years of chaos in the Middle East. Whaddya say? Sounds like a pretty good deal, right?'"
For the record, note that for Bush, the international nuclear agreement is a bad deal, but the catastrophic war in Iraq was a "pretty good deal."
Since then, Jeb has bragged about the advice he receives on international affairs from Paul Wolfowitz, and the candidate even went so far as to boast that the "mission was accomplished" when it came to Iraq's security in late 2008.
It's a rather extraordinary evolution. Six months after practically declaring 2001 to 2008 off-limits, Jeb is now practically bragging that he, backed by his Bush/Cheney team of foreign-policy advisers, intends to create a third term for George W. Bush's foreign policy.
The politics of this is bizarre, but it's not the only relevant angle.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks with the media on his way to his car after delivering the keynote address at the Genesee and Saginaw Republican Party Lincoln Day Event, Aug. 11, 2015 in Birch Run, Mich. (Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty)

Trump eyes mass deportations for millions

08/17/15 08:00AM

It was just a couple of weeks ago when Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump first raised the prospect of mass deportations for millions of immigrants already in the United States. The GOP candidate quickly joined what the Washington Post's Greg Sargent calls the "Cattle Car Caucus."
At the time, Trump made no effort to explain how, exactly, he intends to identify, detain, and deport roughly 11 million people, or how he intends to pay for such a massive undertaking. "Politicians aren't going to find them because they have no clue," Trump said. "We will find them, we will get them out."
As MSNBC's Anna Brand noted, Trump is now going into a little more detail on the issue that's helped propel him to the front of the Republican pack.
Donald Trump on Sunday released his detailed immigration reform plan, encompassing the sentiment he expressed in an interview on "Meet the Press" that aired just an hour earlier: Undocumented immigrants "have to go."
Watching the interview yesterday, the exchange pointed to an apparent contradiction. "Meet the Press" host Chuck Todd asked the GOP candidate, "You're going to split up families. You're going to deport children?"
"No, no," Trump responded. "We're going to keep the families together. We have to keep the families together."
Todd followed up, "But you're going to kick them out?" To which Trump replied, simply, "They have to go."
If this seems like a policy mess, there's a good reason for that. There are many undocumented immigrants, for example, whose children are American citizens, born in the United States. Deporting every immigrant who entered the country illegally, in practical terms, would mean separating parents from their own children.
Except under the Trump plan, the Republican doesn't want to do that. That leads to some alarming possibilities.

Ben Carson's debate bounce and other headlines

08/17/15 07:48AM

Did Ben Carson win the GOP debate? (New York Magazine)

GOP hopefuls split on sending ground troops to Middle East. (AP)

White House to unveil new pilot program to shift emphasis to treatment in the fight against heroin. (Washington Post)

Civil rights activist Julian Bond dies at 75, remembered as a hero. (USA Today)

Racial wealth gap persists despite degree, study says. (New York Times)

With high-profile help, Obama plots life after presidency. (New York Times)

Rivers in Utah, New Mexico reopened after Colorado mine spill. (Wall Street Journal)

read more

Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., speaks at the Capitol in Washington on Dec. 11, 2014. (Photo by J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

This Week in God, 8.15.15

08/15/15 09:01AM

First up from the God Machine this week is an unusual theological argument against the international nuclear agreement with Iran.
As anyone who's followed the debate at all knows, Republicans have made a variety of arguments against the diplomatic deal, nearly all of them related to national security. But as Right Wing Watch reported this week, former Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) went in a more unusual direction, arguing that President Obama is ushering in the End Times, and the nuclear agreement is evidence of the arrival of the Last Days.
Bachmann claimed that the unanimous UN Security Council vote to approve the agreement was "the most important national security event of my lifetime" because it fulfilled the prophecy of Zechariah 12:3 that all the nations of the world will unite against Israel, "with the United States leading that charge." She added that God and "heaven's armies" will use groups like AIPAC to defeat the deal in Congress and in doing so "prove to the world His power and His strength." [...]
Bachmann told listeners that they should feel "encouraged" by the fact that they are living in the End Times, explaining that these dark times are actually the best time to be alive since that means the world will soon come to an end.
The right-wing former lawmaker, just four years removed from her presidential campaign, added that she's "extremely excited" because "I think that we are about to see the strong right arm of the Holy God show to the world and prove to the world, His power and His strength. He is the Lord of Heaven's armies."
To date, she's the only Republican that I'm aware of who's publicly framed the debate over the Iran deal in terms of the End of Days. Whether any of Bachmann's former colleagues follow her lead remains to be seen.
Also from the God Machine this week:
Tycoon Trump didn't foresee White House run

Tycoon Trump didn't foresee White House run

08/14/15 09:00PM

Rachel Maddow shares old footage of GOP frontrunner Donald Trump as a rising real estate tycoon, eschewing talk of amassing billions of dollars and running for public office, even as he now touts his billions as a qualification for the presidency. watch

Arizona town decides not to censor books, adds stickers instead

08/14/15 07:37PM

File this under: You Know More Now.

We got news today from Gilbert, Arizona, an extended suburb of Phoenix. Last fall, the Tea Party majority on the Gilbert school board voted to remove mentions of abortion from the high school honors biology textbooks. They planned to do it by blacking out the text with Sharpies, perhaps, or by ripping out the pages entirely:

"The cheapest, least disruptive way to solve the problem is to remove the page," said board member Daryl Colvin.

The board acted at the urging of the same group that backed gay discrimination bills in Indiana, Arkansas and Louisiana, the Alliance Defending Freedom. Based in Arizona, the Alliance insisted that Gilbert's biology books were out of compliance with an Arizona law requiring school districts to present childbirth and adoption as preferable to abortion. But soon after the Tea Party majority decided to censor the biology books, voters in very conservative Gilbert decided to replace them with a new majority. Shortly afterward, the outgoing board reversed course and decided against going ahead with ripping pages out of biology textbooks.

From the beginning, superintendent Christina Kishimoto had warned her bosses on the board that removing information from the books would only send kids to the Internet to find out what they were missing. With the new majority taking over, Kishimoto told us late last year she would have a team of biology teachers go over the books this summer and likely put together two or three pages of information that they would include in an envelope glued to the inside back cover.

Last night, though, a local viewer emailed us Gilbert's solution, and it turns out to be much smaller than expected.

read more


About The Rachel Maddow Show

Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.

Rachel Maddow LIVE

Speak out! Make your voice heard by tagging your posts #maddow

  • Show
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Latest Book