The Rachel Maddow Show Weekdays at 9PM


... more Duration: {{video.duration.momentjs}}

Rachel Maddow StoriesRSS

select from:

E.g., 6/25/2018
E.g., 6/25/2018
Image: U.S. President Donald Trump delivers remarks at the National Republican Congressional Committee's annual March dinner at the National Building Museum in Washington

Republican donors are financing a whole lot of Trump World lawyers

04/16/18 10:41AM

When rank-and-file partisans make a political contribution, they probably expect the money to go toward normal political activities: advertising, the creation of campaign materials, opening offices, etc.

But when Donald Trump's backers offer their financial support, they're also picking up a non-traditional tab. USA Today  reported overnight that the president's re-election campaign has raised $10.1 million so far in 2018, which is itself interesting given how far away the 2020 race is. But in this case, what's arguably more interesting than the money going into Trump's campaign coffers is the money that's going out.

[M]ore than 20% of the nearly $3.9 million Trump spent this year went to pay legal bills, according to the reports his campaign filed Sunday with the Federal Election Commission. Those bills topped $834,000 during the first three months of this year, as Trump donors picked up the tab at several law firms, including one handling some of the headline-grabbing controversies surrounding the president in recent months.

A Washington Post  report added, "The latest figures bring the Trump campaign's total spending on legal fees to nearly $4 million since the president took office, records show. In the last quarter of 2017, Trump's campaign committee spent $1.1 million in legal fees."

Some of the costs are specific to the Trump campaign -- which has legal burdens related to the investigation into the Russia scandal, for example --while some of the money is going to cover the president's legal costs dealing with scandals such as the Stormy Daniels matter.

read more

Donald Trump introduces Trump University at a press conference in Trump Tower, New York, May 2005. (Photo by Dan Herrick/KPA/ZUMA)

Judge finalizes $25 million settlement in Trump's fraud case

04/16/18 10:00AM

It took a while, but the Trump University fraud case officially reached its end last week. The political fallout, however, hasn't quite run its course.

USA Today  reported the other day on the end of the settlement agreement.

A federal judge finalized the $25 million settlement between President Trump and students of his now shuttered Trump University on Monday, with New York's attorney general claiming "victims of Donald Trump's fraudulent university will finally receive the relief they deserve."

The order from U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel -- the same Indiana-born judge Trump called biased because of his "Mexican heritage" -- comes a year after he first approved the settlement. It marks the end of two class-action lawsuits and a civil lawsuit from New York accusing Trump of "swindling thousands of Americans out of millions of dollars through Trump University," in the words of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.

The circumstances are nothing short of bizarre: a sitting president of the United States has written a check for $25 million to a group of Americans who credibly claimed that he ripped them off by perpetrating a fraud.

You know things are bad for a president when a story like this goes almost entirely unnoticed by the public, eclipsed by a dozen or so more pressing scandals.

Regardless, after keeping a close eye on this case for a long while, I think it’s a shame to see the case end -- because I’ve long believed this is one of the underappreciated controversies of Trump’s recent career.

Indeed, as regular readers may recall, the finalized settlement agreement wasn’t supposed to happen at all -- according to the president.

read more

Image: US President Donald J. Trump departs the White House

Pence finds, hires, and loses his national security adviser

04/16/18 09:20AM

It started as a story that didn't make any sense. We learned on Friday that Vice President Mike Pence had hired Jon Lerner to serve as his national security adviser, despite the fact that Lerner is a Republican pollster with no national security experience, and despite the fact that Lerner already has a job he intended to keep as a deputy to U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley.

In other words, after "months of searching," Pence found an unqualified national security adviser who'd split his time, working for the vice president while also working in an entirely different office, in an entirely different building.

Over the weekend, the convoluted story got a little worse with an Axios report that said Donald Trump had voiced his dissatisfaction with Pence's choice.

Trump was furious when he learned Pence was bringing on Nikki Haley's deputy Jon Lerner, according to three sources familiar with the events. The President believed Lerner was a card-carrying member of the "Never Trump" movement because Lerner crafted brutal attack ads for Club for Growth's multimillion-dollar anti-Trump blitz during the Republican primaries.

"Why would Mike do that?" Trump wondered aloud about Pence's decision, according to two sources briefed on the President's private conversations.

The piece added that Trump told White House Chief of Staff John Kelly "to get rid of Lerner."

This morning, the New York Times reported that Lerner has now quit the job he hadn't yet begun, informing the vice president that he's "withdrawing from coming on board." He'll remain a member of Haley's team at the United Nations, however.

read more

Image: Damascus Sky, Syria Attack

The words Trump didn't learn not to say: 'Mission Accomplished'

04/16/18 08:40AM

Before turning his attention to former FBI Director James Comey, Donald Trump reflected briefly on Saturday on the military strikes in Syria he'd ordered the night before:

"A perfectly executed strike last night. Thank you to France and the United Kingdom for their wisdom and the power of their fine Military. Could not have had a better result. Mission Accomplished!"

There really aren't many phrases modern presidents need to avoid in situations like these, but perhaps Trump wasn't paying attention to current events in 2003 -- or any of the years that followed.

Even Ari Fleischer, hardly a neutral political observer, wrote on Saturday, "Um ... I would have recommended ending this tweet with not those two words."

Whether Trump understands this or not, "Mission Accomplished" was the text on the banner above George W. Bush's head in 2003 when the then-president declared the end of "major combat operations" in Iraq. Bush never literally spoke the words "mission accomplished" in his remarks, but they appeared over his head during the speech and his presidency was haunted by the phrase.

As conditions in Iraq deteriorated, the death toll mounted, and the arguments in support of the invasion evaporated, that two-word banner came to represent premature celebration of a conflict that was at its beginning, not its end.

Even Bush later conceded the message was a "mistake."

For reasons that don't appear to make any sense, Trump seems eager to repeat the mistake. Indeed, in some ways, it's even more difficult to understand this president's use of the phrase, since Trump has never even tried to explain what the U.S. mission in Syria is.

read more


Following military strikes in Syria, Trump confronts awkward questions

04/16/18 08:00AM

It's difficult to separate a leader's decisions from their context. After Donald Trump announced the launch of new military strikes in Syria on Friday night, for example, much of the world was forced to consider the possibility that the American president may have been motivated, at least in part, by the scandals and criminal intrigue consuming his presidency.

As Rachel put it on the show after Trump's White House remarks:

"The perception that the president may have ordered these strikes in part because of scandal will affect the impact and the effectiveness of these military strikes. Unavoidably. Even if the tail is not wagging the dog, even if you give the president every benefit of the doubt, even if his calculations about whether to launch this action against Syria tonight was taken with absolutely no regard for what else is going on in the president's life right now, what else is going on in the president's life right now unavoidably creates a real perception around the globe that that may have been part of the motivation both for what he did and particularly for when he did it.

"And it is a sad thing and it is an upsetting thing in terms of American influence in the world and the risks that we take when we use American military power anywhere. But that perception, that this president under this much siege may have made this decision that was in any way inflected by the scandals surrounding him, that by necessity has shaped America's national security options for who we are in the world tonight and it will unavoidably shape the impact of this military action."

It's against this backdrop that the president should be going out of his way to reassure the public and the world that his principal focus is on the national security interests of the United States and its allies, and the broader goal of peace and stability in the region. Trump has a powerful incentive to at least pretend to be a responsible leader right now, signaling to the world that no matter the concerns about his presidency, he's approaching U.S. intervention in Syria with sober maturity, with seriousness of purpose, and with a clear and stable mind.

But he's not. Trump has spent the last few days doing the opposite.

read more

Trump juggles personal chaos with international issues

Trump juggles personal chaos with international issues

04/13/18 09:24PM

Hallie Jackson, NBC News White House correspondent reports that Donald Trump's peronal attorney Michael Cohen is denying a McClatchy report that Robert Mueller has evidence of Cohen visiting Prague in 2016, just one of several significant issues Trump is dealing with as military operations take place in Syria. watch


About The Rachel Maddow Show

Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.


Latest Book