The Rachel Maddow Show Weekdays at 9PM

Help

... more Duration: {{video.duration.momentjs}}

Rachel Maddow StoriesRSS

select from:

E.g., 2/21/2017
E.g., 2/21/2017
Image: The dome of the U.S. Capitol building is seen past a microphone during a rehearsal for the inaugural ceremonies in Washington

Selling access, Trump's inaugural committee collects record haul

01/17/17 10:09AM

It's pretty much the opposite of "draining the swamp." A couple of weeks after Donald Trump's improbable election victory, his inaugural committee started selling "exclusive access" to the president-elect and his team "in exchange for donations of $1 million and more."

As a New York Times report makes clear, there were plenty of contributors ready to take up the offer.
All told, the group planning the inaugural festivities says it has raised more than $100 million, which would be nearly double the record for an inauguration, with much of it coming in six- and seven-figure checks from America's corporate suites.

In exchange, Mr. Trump's most prolific donors will gain access to what amounts to a parallel inauguration week, carefully planned and largely out of public sight, during which they can mingle with members of the incoming administration over intimate meals and witness Mr. Trump's ascension from the front rows.
Trump's allies generally respond to reports like these by arguing that every modern president, from both parties, has raised millions through his inaugural committee. There's quite a bit of truth to that.

But Trump did run on a platform of ending special-interest influence in Washington -- selling access to corporate donors for $1 million a pop is quite a departure from the Republican's campaign rhetoric -- and as the Times' report added, Trump's donors "are being given greater access and facing fewer limits on donations than those in other recent inaugurations."

George W. Bush and Barack Obama, for example, put caps on individual contributions. Team Trump eliminated those caps. As a result, the previous record for the most money raised by an inaugural committee was $53 million, raised by Obama in 2008 -- which Trump has roughly doubled.
read more

President-elect Donald Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence wave as they visit to Carrier factory, Dec. 1, 2016, in Indianapolis, Ind. (Photo by Evan Vucci/AP)

Trump gets by with a little help from his friends

01/17/17 09:20AM

Donald Trump has spoken quite a bit, before and after Election Day, about his interest in infrastructure investments, and so it hardly came as a surprise when the president-elect looked for personnel to help oversee his plans. What was surprising, however, were the specific picks Trump announced.
President-elect Donald Trump is planning to name real-estate developers Richard LeFrak and Steven Roth to head up a new council he is creating to monitor spending on his proposed $1 trillion plan to improve the nation's roads, bridges and other public works.

Mr. Trump said in an interview Friday with Wall Street Journal reporters and editors that he has asked the two New York-based developers ... to oversee the council of 15 to 20 builders and engineers. "They're pros," he said. "That's what they do. All their lives, they build. They build under-budget, ahead of schedule."
Trump, the Wall Street Journal article added, has known LeFrak and Roth "for decades."

And by all appearances, that's an important part -- if not the most important part -- of their background. The president-elect clearly likes to hire people he knows personally.

David Friedman, for example, is Trump's bankruptcy lawyer. He's also Trump's nominee to become the next U.S. Ambassador to Israel.

Jason Greenblatt is the Chief Legal Officer for Trump Organization. He's also the man the president-elect recently tapped to oversee international negotiations in the incoming administration.

Jared Kushner is Trump's son-in-law. He'll also soon become a senior adviser to the president in the Trump White House.
read more

House Budget Committee Chairman Tom Price, R-Ga., presides over a markup session on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., March 16, 2016. (Photo by J. Scott Applewhite/AP)

Investment controversies raise doubts about Trump's pick for HHS

01/17/17 08:40AM

Just on the surface, Rep. Tom Price's (R-Ga.) nomination to become the Secretary of Health and Human Services appears problematic. The far-right congressman has a radical approach to health policy; he's associated with fringe elements; and he's been a staunch critic of evidence-based policymaking.

Making matters even more unusual, by some accounts, Donald Trump's transition team has kept Price out of the loop while officials work on the incoming administration's health-care reform package, so that he'll be "inoculated" during his confirmation hearings. In other words, Trump World doesn't want Price to have to answer questions about the policies he'd implement at HHS, so Trump aides have kept him deliberately in the dark.

But below the surface, controversies like this one, as reported by CNN, keep popping up.
Price bought between $1,001 to $15,000 worth of shares last March in Zimmer Biomet, according to House records reviewed by CNN. Less than a week after the transaction, the Georgia Republican congressman introduced the HIP Act, legislation that would have delayed until 2018 a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regulation that industry analysts warned would significantly hurt Zimmer Biomet financially once fully implemented.

Zimmer Biomet, one of the world's leading manufacturers of knee and hip implants, was one of two companies that would have been hit the hardest by the new CMS regulation that directly impacts the payments for such procedures, according to press reports and congressional sources.
And while that doesn't look good for Price, it looks even worse when one notes that the company's political action committee donated to the congressman's campaign after he worked on the bill that would benefit the company's finances.

The timeline paints an unflattering picture: (1) Price buys Zimmer Biomet stock; (2) Price quickly introduces legislation that would benefit Zimmer Biomet; (3) Price receives a campaign contribution from Zimmer Biomet.
read more

Then, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump holds a campaign rally in Cleveland, Ohio, on Oct. 22, 2016. (Photo by Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

New polls show Trump's honeymoon is over before it starts

01/17/17 08:00AM

There's a core group of Donald Trump followers who continue to hold him in high regard, but the latest national polling suggests the Republican president-elect's support does not extend much beyond this base.
Donald Trump enters office as the most unpopular of at least the last seven newly elected presidents, a new ABC News/Washington Post poll finds, with ratings for handling the transition that are also vastly below those of his predecessors.

Forty percent of Americans in the national survey approve of the way Trump has handled the transition, half as many as the 80 percent who approved of Barack Obama's preparations to take office. Trump also far trails George W. Bush (72 percent transition approval), Bill Clinton (81 percent) and George H.W. Bush (82 percent) on this measure.
The Washington Post/ABC News poll offers very little in the way of good news for the incoming president. Trump's favorability rating is just 40%, "by far the lowest popularity for an incoming president in polling since 1977." His unfavorability rating is an astonishing 54%.

The same poll found 61% of the country lacks confidence in Trump to make the right decisions, while 52% still believe the president-elect is unqualified for the office he's poised to take.

These results coincide with a new CNN poll, which found Trump with a 40% approval rating, "the lowest of any recent president." Most Americans say the president-elect's post-election conduct has "made them less confident in his ability to handle the presidency."

Worse, by most metrics, Americans' impressions of Trump "have worsened since November."

This morning's new polling comes on the heels of a Gallup poll that found Trump broadly unpopular in the country he's poised to lead, which itself came on the heels of a Quinnipiac poll, which showed Trump with a favorability rating of just 37%.

There is no modern precedent for a dynamic like this.
read more

Monday's Mini-Report, 1.16.17

01/16/17 05:30PM

Today's edition of quick hits:

* Noor Salman: "The wife of Orlando nightclub gunman Omar Mateen was arrested by the FBI on Monday in connection with the mass shooting and charged with obstruction and giving support to a terrorist organization, officials said."

* Commutations: "Justice Department officials have completed their review of more than 16,000 clemency petitions filed by federal prisoners over the past two years and sent their last recommendations to President Obama, who is set to grant hundreds more commutations to nonviolent drug offenders during his final days in office."

* Exiting stage right: "Conservative author Monica Crowley said Monday she would not be taking a senior communications role in President-elect Donald Trump's administration amid allegations of plagiarism. Crowley, who had been chosen for senior director of strategic communications for Trump's National Security Council, announced she was bowing out to 'pursue other opportunities.'"

* One of the key stories to watch: "In excerpts from an hourlong interview published by the Journal on Friday, Trump said: 'If you get along and if Russia is really helping us, why would anybody have sanctions if somebody's doing some really great things?'"

* China's foreign ministry "issued a thinly veiled rebuke of Donald Trump, following a statement by the U.S. president-elect that the 'One China' policy -- which has underpinned bilateral ties for almost four decades -- was negotiable.... Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Lu Kang said the policy was the foundation of U.S.-China ties and was nonnegotiable."

* Secretary of State John Kerry was back in Vietnam over the weekend, and he met a man who once tried to kill him.
read more

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is seen through the audience before participating in a roundtable event, Sept. 27, 2016, in Miami. (Photo by John Locher/AP)

Questions of illegitimacy dog Team Trump on Inauguration Week

01/16/17 12:51PM

The more Donald Trump faces questions about the legitimacy of his election, the more his allies and supporters are pushing a very specific talking point: If President Obama didn't face these questions, Trump shouldn't either.

Here, for example, was Reince Priebus, the incoming White House chief of staff, on ABC yesterday:
"You didn't have Republicans questioning whether or not Obama legitimately beat John McCain in 2008."
Two days earlier, Fox News' Dana Perino, the Bush/Cheney White House press secretary, said "no one" argued that Barack Obama "was not a legitimate president." Over the weekend, CNN's Ben Ferguson, a conservative pundit, added he "can't imagine the fallout ... if a Republican ever implied" that Obama was an illegitimate president. Ferguson added that such talk is "unprecedented."

Do you ever get the feeling some of Donald Trump's allies occasionally forget about Donald Trump's existence? Or at a minimum, they've forgotten that his most notable contribution to the political discourse in recent years was his role championing a racist conspiracy theory about the current president?

"No one" argued that Obama "was not a legitimate president"? Well, one guy certainly did. Not only did Trump question Obama's legitimacy in the president's first term, Trump referred to Obama's re-election as "a total sham." Around the same time, Trump declared, "We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!"

In context, Trump made this argument because he thought Obama had lost the popular vote. Obama actually won the popular vote with ease -- which is itself a detail that creates a wrinkle for Republicans since Trump did not.

The result is a disconnect Republicans haven't even tried to resolve: Democrats are being asked to respect the process in order to honor an incoming president who's never respected the process. I'm honestly not sure what the GOP response would be if Democrats responded, "We promise to respect the system and the office every bit as much as Donald J. Trump did."
read more

Monday's Campaign Round-Up, 1.16.17

01/16/17 12:00PM

Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.

* The number of congressional Democrats who have publicly announced they will not attend Donald Trump's inauguration continues to grow. As of yesterday, it looks like the total is up to 27 -- a number that grew sharply following the president-elect's tweets about Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.).

* Though there were reports that Trump had planned a visit to the National African American Museum yesterday, those plans were scrapped due to "scheduling issues."

* Reince Priebus, the incoming White House chief of staff, boasted yesterday that Trump "won in an electoral landslide." In case he's forgotten, let's note that repeating a lie doesn't make it true.

* Republican lawmakers in North Carolina are challenging Gov. Roy Cooper's (D) Medicaid expansion in federal courts, even though it's a state law that appears to block the policy. Why go this route? Because Republicans fear a Democratic majority on the state Supreme Court.

* Just when it seemed no other candidates would run for chair of the Democratic National Committee, Jehmu Greene joined the crowded field late last week. Greene, who has been a paid Fox News analyst, resigned from the network last week in order to seek the DNC leadership post.

* Jennifer Holliday and Andrea Bocelli both canceled their scheduled appearances at Trump's inauguration over the weekend.
read more

President-elect Donald Trump speaks during a rally at the Orlando Amphitheater at the Central Florida Fairgrounds, Dec. 16, 2016, in Orlando, Fla. (Photo by Evan Vucci/AP)

If Trump isn't Putin's puppet, why does he act like he is?

01/16/17 11:20AM

Writing in Slate the other day, William Saletan expressed skepticism about some of the more provocative questions about Donald Trump and his relationship with Moscow. Saletan doesn't believe the Republican "colluded" with Russia, for example, and is unmoved by the unverified dossier released last week.

But this incredulity left Saletan with a dilemma: if we reject the worst of the possible explanations for Trump's behavior, what are we left with?
How do we explain the overtly pro-Russian behavior of Trump and his surrogates? If they're not Russian puppets, why do they work so hard to defend Putin and Russia against American investigators and reporters? Why do they divert blame to other countries and victims of the hack? Why, instead of targeting the Russian intelligence agencies that infiltrated us, do they attack the American intelligence agencies that exposed the Russians?
Slate published this on Friday, and the questions have only grown more serious since.

Yesterday, for example, Trump sat down with two European newspapers for an interview in which he dismissed NATO as "obsolete"; criticized German Chancellor Angela Merkel for assisting Syrian refugees (whom Trump referred to as "illegals"); said the United States "should be ready to trust" Russian President Vladimir Putin; and endorsed the further unraveling of the European Union.

Not to put too fine a point on this, but if the Kremlin had literally written a script and handed it to Trump to read during the interview, it would've sounded exactly like this.

For eight years, Republicans have accused President Obama of encouraging U.S. enemies and discouraging U.S. allies. America's longtime friends, GOP politicians have said, are no longer sure they can count on support from the United States as a result of Obama's foreign policy. The bizarre argument has always been wrong, but ironically, it's poised to become true in the Republican administration that takes power on Friday.
read more

Image: *** BESTPIX *** President-Elect Donald Trump Holds Press Conference In New York

Trump makes health care promises he'll never be able to keep

01/16/17 10:41AM

A couple of weeks ago, Politico noted that "fear" was starting to overcome congressional Republicans when it came to health care, and the conversation within the GOP "has definitely shifted" as governing realities took hold.

Whereas the party had adopted a "let's-burn-the-joint-down" posture, Republicans are now realizing "how hard it will be to replace the law, and many of them have plainly settled on the fact that they will never be able to craft a plan to insure as many people as Obamacare does."

That last part was of particular significance: if Republicans are slowly recognizing the fact that their ACA alternative "will never" cover as many Americans as the Affordable Care Act does, the party isn't just facing a policy challenge; it's also facing a political crisis. Caught up in an irrational crusade against an effective law, GOP policymakers are preparing to sell the public on a plan that will leave millions of Americans behind.

But not Donald Trump. No, the president-elect told the Washington Post yesterday that he will overhaul the health care system in a way that won't require sacrifices at all.
As he has developed a replacement package, Trump said he has paid attention to critics who say that repealing Obamacare would put coverage at risk for more than 20 million Americans covered under the law's insurance exchanges and Medicaid expansion.

"We're going to have insurance for everybody," Trump said. "There was a philosophy in some circles that if you can't pay for it, you don't get it. That's not going to happen with us." People covered under the law "can expect to have great health care. It will be in a much simplified form. Much less expensive and much better."
Trump is establishing some fairly specific benchmarks: universal coverage, "much lower deductibles," and a simpler and less expensive system in which all Americans are "beautifully covered."

If it sounds a bit like the president-elect is describing a single-payer system -- which he used to support until he condemned his own ideas -- you're not the only one who noticed. That said, Trump specifically told the Post, "I don't want single-payer."

So how exactly does he intend to keep these promises, which are wildly at odds with his own party's approach to the issue? Trump didn't say, though he insisted the details of his reform plan are nearly complete.

It's as if he's never heard of the problem of politicians who over-promise.
read more

Pages

About The Rachel Maddow Show

Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.

MaddowBlog_Appendix_logo

#Maddow

Latest Book