White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer listens to National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster during the daily news conference in the Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House May 12, 2017 in Washington, DC. 
Win McNamee

Trump’s ‘tapes’ have suddenly become even more important

Not surprisingly, congressional Democrats weren’t pleased to learn that Donald Trump reportedly shared highly sensitive secrets with Russian officials for no good reason. For an American president to casually undermine national security and cause an international incident tends to make the president’s detractors uncomfortable.

The Rachel Maddow Show, 5/12/17, 9:53 PM ET

Trump behavior toward Comey likely making his lawyers unhappy

Bob Bauer, White House Counsel to President Obama, talks with Rachel Maddow about the legal issues at play in Donald Trump’s firing of James Comey and his stated reasons for doing so with regard to the Trump-Russia investigation.
But one statement jumped out at me as especially interesting.
House Democrats Elijah Cummings, the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, and John Conyers, the ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, released a joint statement arguing that “Republicans and Democrats in the House of Representatives need a briefing from the national security adviser and the directors of our nation’s intelligence agencies to get to the bottom of these allegations.”

The congressmen added that if audio recordings exist of the meeting, “Congress needs to obtain them immediately.”
Ah yes, the “tapes.” The president himself raised the prospect last week of secret recordings he’s made of White House conversations, and Press Secretary Sean Spicer didn’t contradict him, refusing to confirm or deny the existence of such recordings. By late Friday, Trump said he “can’t talk about” the subject, but by then, it was too late – because he’d already raised the question we didn’t know to ask.

Those recordings, if they exist, were already a key part of the controversies surrounding Trump, and they may help prove whether the president obstructed justice as part of the Russia scandal. But last night, the possibility of these recordings took on an added significance: they may also shed light on the president providing a foreign adversary with highly classified intelligence.

The stonewalling continued yesterday. Consider this striking exchange from yesterday’s White House press briefing between Spicer and NBC News’ Hallie Jackson:
JACKSON: Why won’t you just explain whether or not there are recordings of the ]resident’s conversation?

SPICER: The president has made it clear what his position is.

JACKSON: That’s not my question, so why won’t you explain it?

SPICER: I understand that.  Because that’s what the president’s position is.

JACKSON: So given that you refuse to confirm or deny any of this, how is any senior official supposed to feel comfortable having a conversation privately with the president?

SPICER: As I’ve said, Hallie, the president has made it clear what his position is.
In reality, the president hasn’t made it clear what his position is. Trump raised the possibility that these audio recordings exist, and then he and his White House refused comment. That’s not making a position clear; it’s the opposite.

And now that Trump appears to have shared highly sensitive secrets with Russia in a conversation that may have been recorded, we’re going to need quite a bit more clarity.

Donald Trump, Russia and White House

Trump's 'tapes' have suddenly become even more important