The Rachel Maddow Show Weekdays at 9PM


... more Duration: {{video.duration.momentjs}}

Rachel Maddow StoriesRSS

select from:

E.g., 7/23/2019
E.g., 7/23/2019

Trump defends racist tweets, says 'many people agree' with him

07/15/19 02:20PM

If Donald Trump intended to spark a controversy with his racist tweets directed at four Democratic congresswomen, he succeeded.

The president hosted a "Made in America" showcase at the White House this morning, and not surprisingly, there were more than a few questions for the man who said the progressive lawmakers -- each of whom are Americans, three of whom were born in the United States -- should "go back" to the "broken and crime infested places from which they came."

This brief exchange helped summarize the Republican's current posture.

Q: Does it concern you that many people saw that tweet as racist and that white nationalist groups are finding common cause with you on that point?

TRUMP: It doesn't concern me because many people agree with me.

That's not an answer. "Many people" may agree with a racist statement; that doesn't make it less racist. Propriety and decency need not be seen through the lens of a popularity contest.

He added, in apparent reference to elected American congresswomen, "These are people that. in my opinion. hate our country." (As he sees it, to condemn his agenda is to hate the country itself.) Trump soon after argued, over and over again, that his critics are welcome to leave the country.

"If you are not happy here, then you can leave," he said. "As far as I am concerned, if you hate our country, if you're not happy here, you can leave. That is what I say all of the time."

The repetition doesn't make presidential rhetoric like this any less offensive. Trump's line is quite plainly a direct attack on dissent. In the American tradition, those who are dissatisfied with the country's direction are encouraged to become politically engaged and work to produce change.

In this president's vision, those who are dissatisfied with the country's direction are encouraged to leave the United States altogether. Donald Trump apparently sees the country as the proper home for those who appreciate and celebrate Donald Trump.

There was a six-word slogan in the Vietnam era, repeated by war supporters: "America: Love It or Leave It." The idea, evidently, has been re-embraced by the current president.

read more

Image: U.S. ICE officers conduct a targeted enforcement operation in Atlanta

Trump won't say if servicemembers' loved ones could be deported

07/15/19 12:42PM

Many communities across the country have been braced for mass-deportation efforts, which Donald Trump has said are on the way, though for now, the initiative hasn't taken shape in earnest. NBC News reported yesterday afternoon that immigration raids have begun, but the pace has "started slow."

Earlier Sunday afternoon, there was little evidence of massive immigration enforcement operations, as immigrant communities prepared for their arrival.

Two senior Department of Homeland Security officials told NBC News last week that the raids, which had been postponed several weeks ago, were scheduled to take place on Sunday. But the administration altered its plans from a large-scale sweep to a smaller set of arrests over the coming week after news reports informed immigrant communities about the raids, The New York Times reported Sunday, citing several current and former Department of Homeland Security officials familiar with the operation.

Ruthie Epstein, the deputy director for immigration policy at the American Civil Liberties Union, told NBC News that the group had not heard anything from its networks as of Sunday afternoon, but were closely monitoring the situation.

It's tough to speculate about the reasoning behind the latest developments. Maybe the president's mass-deportation chest-thumping was meaningless rhetoric; maybe the DHS efforts will intensify in the coming days and weeks. I don't imagine anyone facing the threat will grow complacent anytime soon.

What struck me as especially notable, however, was a question a reporter asked Trump during a brief Q&A on Friday. At issue were U.S. military families and the prospect of deportations.

This was the exchange after the president was asked if he'd provide any assurances to servicemembers' families:

read more

Monday's Campaign Round-Up, 7.15.19

07/15/19 12:00PM

Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.

* The latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll found each of the top contenders for the Democratic nomination leading Donald Trump in hypothetical match-ups. Former Vice President Joe Biden (D) fared the best, leading the president by nine points, while Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) had the smallest advantage, leading Trump by just one point.

* Biden is unveiling his health care blueprint today, and it's largely based on building on the existing Affordable Care Act. Of particular interest, though, is Biden's support for a public option -- part of the original ACA plan, before it was killed by then-Sen. Joe Lieberman.

* Former Rep. Beto O'Rourke (D-Texas) acknowledged yesterday that his paternal great-great-great grandfather owned slaves, and he incorporated this fact into his support for an agenda that would "change this country so that it works for those who have been locked-out of -- or locked-up in -- this system."

* In a bit of a surprise, Trump officially endorsed Bill Hagerty's Republican Senate campaign in Tennessee, which was odd since Hagerty -- the current ambassador to Japan -- hasn't yet launched a Senate campaign in Tennessee. (This would also seem to raise fresh Hatch Act questions.)

* California's state legislature recently approved a measure that would require presidential candidates to release five years' worth of tax returns before appearing on the ballot. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) hasn't yet said whether he intends to sign the bill into law, though if he does, it'll be the first law of its kind in the country. It would also be in effect for the 2020 cycle.

* Though it's been widely assumed that former Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) would run again for elected office, we apparently shouldn't expect to see his next candidacy anytime soon. Walker has agreed to serve as president of the far-right Young America's Foundation, and he conceded this would preclude running for anything in 2020 or 2022.

read more

U.S.  President Obama meets with President-elect Trump in the White House Oval Office in Washington

After failing to change the census, Team Trump peddles lie about Obama

07/15/19 11:20AM

It's not unusual for Donald Trump to use his social-media accounts to promote his television appearances, but on Friday morning, the president did something a little unusual: he encouraged his followers to watch Rush Limbaugh appear on Fox News. In case that weren't quite odd enough, Trump celebrated the interview a half-hour later, insisting the far-right radio host had done a "great job."

Fact-checkers would disagree. Limbaugh's appearance came on the heels of the president's embarrassing retreat on his efforts to change the 2020 census, and the radio personality did his best to direct conservative disappointment in a new direction.

"The real controversy here is who took the citizenship question off of the census, and why?" Limbaugh said. "Why is it controversy wanting to know who among us happens to be a citizen and who isn't? Why is that controversial? It would seem to me that this kind of attention should have been asked when somebody in the Obama regime decided to get rid of it."

This came the same week Kellyanne Conway, a prominent White House aide and Trump loyalty, also appeared on "Fox & Friends" and said, "Why can't we just ask the question the way it was asked for 50 years before the Obama administration yanked it out of there?"

In case you get an angry email from your weird uncle who watches Fox all day, let's take a look at the latest piece from the Associated Press.

The Obama administration did not pull the citizenship question from the census after 50 years. The Census Bureau hasn't included a citizenship question in its once-a-decade survey sent to all U.S. households since 1950.

From 1970 to 2000, the question was included only in the long-form section of the census survey, which is sent to a portion of U.S. households. After 2000, the question has been asked each year since 2005 on the Census Bureau's American Community Survey, a separate poll also sent to a sample of U.S. households.

The Census Bureau made the switch to that survey in 2005 as a replacement to the long-form supplement, prior to the Obama administration. As a result of that switch, no long form was sent as part of the next-held census in 2010, when Obama was in office. Instead, the citizenship question was asked as part of the 2010 ACS survey.

Last year, then-White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders seemed to get the ball rolling on this, blaming Barack Obama and his team for having removed a citizenship question from the 2010 census.

read more

File photo taken in November 2017 shows U.S. President Donald Trump (and Chinese President Xi Jinping attending a welcome ceremony in Beijing.

Trump tries (and fails) to brag about China's economic troubles

07/15/19 10:43AM

Economic growth in China slowed in the second quarter, and as CNBC reported, it was "the weakest rate in at least 27 years." The report added that Donald Trump's trade war on Beijing has clearly taken a toll.

With that in mind, the American president celebrated a bit on Twitter this morning, boasting that his tariffs are "having a major effect on companies wanting to leave China for non-tariffed countries." Trump added, that the United States is "receiving Billions of Dollars in Tariffs from China, with possibly much more to come. These Tariffs are paid for by China devaluing & pumping, not by the U.S. taxpayer!"

The second part of this boast is outrageously false and evidence that Trump is still hopelessly confused about his own trade policy in any meaningful way. The Republican has been told countless times that American importers and consumers are paying more as a result of his tariffs -- not China -- but the president refuses to learn the basic details of his own agenda.

But the first part of his tweet is far less ridiculous. The Wall Street Journal reported overnight that there are shifts underway in Asia-Pacific manufacturing.

U.S. manufacturers are shifting production to countries outside of China as trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies stretch into a second year. [...]

The biggest beneficiaries of that decline have been other countries in Asia where production costs are low, such as Vietnam, India, Taiwan and Malaysia. [...]

There is little evidence, though, of U.S. manufacturers bringing production from China back to the U.S., a move the Trump administration hoped the tariffs would encourage.

And that's what makes Trump's boasts so odd.

According to the White House, the point of the president's trade agenda -- or one of them, anyway -- is to encourage manufacturers to bring their production work back to American soil. Trump talks about this all the time: companies that want to avoid tariffs can simply make their products in the United States.

Putting aside the complicating factors -- most notably, what that would do to the prices of most consumer goods -- the evidence shows Trump isn't generating the intended results. U.S. manufacturers are shifting production away from China, but they're not bringing their businesses here.

read more

A statue of Nathan Bedford Forrest sits on a concrete pedestal at a park named after the confederate cavalryman in Memphis Tenn. (Photo by Adrian Sainz/AP).

Why Tennessee's gov signed a proclamation honoring early KKK leader

07/15/19 10:02AM

Every January in Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi, state law recognizes two holidays on the same day: one recognizing Dr. Martin Luther King, the other recognizing Confederate General Robert E. Lee.

As the Tennessean reported the other day, their neighbors in the Volunteer State have a related issue of concern.

Gov. Bill Lee has proclaimed Saturday as Nathan Bedford Forrest Day in Tennessee, a day of observation to honor the former Confederate general and early Ku Klux Klan leader whose bust is on display in the state Capitol.

Per state law, the Tennessee governor is tasked with issuing proclamations for six separate days of special observation, three of which, including the July 13 Forrest Day, pertain to the Confederacy.

Lee -- and governors who have come before him -- are also required by state law to proclaim Jan. 19 as Robert E. Lee Day, honoring the commander of the Confederate Army, as well as June 3 Confederate Decoration Day, otherwise known as Confederate Memorial Day and the birthday of Confederate President Jefferson Davis.

The state's first-year Republican governor told reporters on Thursday, "I signed the bill because the law requires that I do that and I haven't looked at changing that law."

At first blush, the first part of that response may seem like a decent response -- it's tough to blame a governor for following state law -- but it's that second part that stands out.

Tennessee could, for example, change state law and end Nathan Bedford Forrest Day. Even Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), hardly a champion of progressive values, has encouraged state officials to do exactly that. Indeed, Tennessee Democrats have already tried.

read more

People looking for work stand in line to apply for a job during a job fair at the Miami Dolphins Sun Life stadium in Miami, Fla. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty)

Trading one controversial Labor secretary for another

07/15/19 09:20AM

Donald Trump's first choice for Labor secretary was an embarrassing fiasco: Andrew Puzder was forced to withdraw less than a month into the Republican's presidency for a variety of reasons, not the least of which were allegations of domestic violence raised by his ex-wife.

Trump's second choice for Labor secretary fared better -- Alex Acosta managed to get confirmed by the Senate -- though he resigned under a cloud of scandal last week, under pressure over a sweetheart deal he approved for a sexual predator accused of trafficking children.

All of which brings us to Patrick Pizzella, the president's new, acting Labor secretary. As CNBC reported, "Democratic senators and civil rights groups have expressed concern about Pizzella's prior work with disgraced Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff in the late 1990s and early 2000s to hamper worker protections in the Northern Mariana Islands."

Mother Jones added in an updated report from two years ago:

There's lobbying, and then there's working with Jack Abramoff to promote the sweatshop economy on remote Pacific islands. If you want to know about that kind of lobbying, you can ask Patrick Pizzella, President Donald Trump's pick to be deputy labor secretary. Or maybe you can't.

At a July [2017] Senate confirmation hearing, Pizzella said he didn't remember much about the work he did in the late 1990s to help the Northern Mariana Islands.... What Pizzella didn't say was that he helped lead a public relations campaign to rebrand the islands as a paragon of free-market principles. Between 1996 and 2000, emails and billing records reviewed by Mother Jones show that Pizzella and colleagues organized all-expenses-paid trips to the islands for more than 100 members of Congress, their staffers, and conservative thought leaders. When they got back, Pizzella helped them convince colleagues that the Northern Mariana Islands were, as his old boss Abramoff liked to put it, a "laboratory of liberty."

Politico added on Friday that Pizzella is "a polarizing figure beloved by conservatives for his pro-business views and disliked by unions and Democrats for a history of opposing worker protections."

read more


The wrong messenger: Trump targets those who 'speak badly' of the US

07/15/19 08:40AM

Several hours after his racist criticisms of four Democratic congresswomen sparked outrage, Donald Trump returned to the subject last night, insisting that the representatives are worthy of his contempt.

"So sad to see the Democrats sticking up for people who speak so badly of our Country.... Their disgusting language and the many terrible things they say about the United States must not be allowed to go unchallenged."

Note the use of the phrase "our country," as opposed to "their country" -- as if Trump can claim allegiance to the United States in ways his domestic critics cannot. It's an extension of the Republican's eagerness to define his opponents as The Other.

But that's hardly the only problem.

Stripped of context or relevant details, Trump's pushback might seem vaguely compelling to those who haven't paid much attention: it's hardly ridiculous to think an American president would defend his or her country against those who say "terrible things" about it.

Two fairly obvious problems quickly emerge, however. The first is the dubious premise: Trump is going after Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) for allegedly speaking "badly" of the United States, but there's no reason to accept the premise at face value.

These Democratic lawmakers have had plenty of criticisms for the Trump administration and its agenda, but that's not the same thing as criticizing the country itself.

The second is the disconnect between the message and the messenger. Indeed, if Trump wants to talk about American politicians who "speak badly" of the U.S., perhaps we should start the conversation with the president's criticisms of his own country.

Because if anyone lacks the patriotic high ground in this debate, it's Donald J. Trump.

read more

Democratic representative from New York Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez during an event with Democratic members of Congress and national organization members to reintroduce the Paycheck Fairness Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., January 30, 2019.

Why it matters that Trump urged reps to 'go back' where they came from

07/15/19 08:00AM

About a month ago, House Democratic leaders brought a border bill to the floor for a vote, with the hopes that their members would rally behind it. For the most part, Dems backed the proposal and it passed with relative ease. There were, however, a handful of exceptions.

Four first-year progressives -- Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) -- balked at their party's bill, signaling a fissure between the left and the Democratic leadership.

Yesterday morning, "Fox & Friends" aired a segment on the four women lawmakers. Just minutes later, Donald Trump thought it'd be a good idea to share some thoughts on the subject.

"So interesting to see 'Progressive' Democrat Congresswomen, who originally came from countries whose governments are a complete and total catastrophe, the worst, most corrupt and inept anywhere in the world (if they even have a functioning government at all), now loudly and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run.

"Why don't they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how it is done. These places need your help badly, you can't leave fast enough.

"I'm sure that Nancy Pelosi would be very happy to quickly work out free travel arrangements!"

For many years, "go back to where you came from" was the kind of ugly rhetoric one might expect to hear from the angry drunk at the end of the bar. Now the overt racism has been embraced by the sitting president of the United States.

Indeed, for Trump, it's performative racism. This president's cringe-worthy record on race is not new, but occasionally, the Republican chooses to flaunt it. Subtext becomes text. Dog whistles become bullhorns. His tolerance for subtleties sometimes disappears and his bigotry becomes plain and unapologetic.

From Trump's perspective, hateful and divisive rhetoric helped elevate him to the nation's office, so he sees value in sticking to the same script, confident in his ability to stoke racial divisions in order to hold onto power.

But as demoralizing as it was to see such a display from a sitting American president, it's important to emphasize that the moral rot of Trump's message runs deep.

read more


About The Rachel Maddow Show

Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.


Latest Book