IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

After sabotage letter, Cotton wants US to 'speak with one voice'

Of all people, Tom Cotton should avoid lectures about the importance of Congress and the White House speaking "with one voice."
Rep. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., attends the 40th annual Conservative Political Action Conference in National Harbor, Md., Thursday, March 14, 2013.  (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
Rep. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., attends the 40th annual Conservative Political Action Conference in National Harbor, Md., Thursday, March 14, 2013.
Congressional Republicans are unanimous in their opposition to the international nuclear agreement with Iran, but even among GOP lawmakers, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) stands out as unique. Arguably no American lawmaker has done more to undermine U.S. foreign policy than the right-wing freshman.
 
This week, as support for the diplomatic deal grows on Capitol Hill, opponents confronted the very real possibility that a Republican bill to derail the agreement may not even get the 60 votes it needs in the Senate to overcome a Democratic filibuster. This in turn led Cotton to issue a fascinating press statement (via Salon's Simon Maloy).

"First, the president did an end-run around the Constitution by refusing to submit the Iran deal as a treaty requiring a two-thirds vote of the Senate for approval. Now Harry Reid wants to deny the American people a voice entirely by blocking an up-or-down vote on this terrible deal. [...] "The Congress and the president should speak with one voice when it comes to dealing with the Iranians, but it seems that Harry Reid believes that only his and the president's voices matter."

Tom Cotton, in case anyone has forgotten, wrote a letter to Iranian officials in March, telling them not to trust U.S. officials, all in the hopes of sabotaging American foreign policy and derailing the international diplomatic talks. The Republican senator corralled 46 of his GOP Senate colleagues to join him in this dangerous stunt, which according to our allies, had the effect of helping Iran during delicate negotiations and embarrassing the United States.
 
Here's a radical idea: maybe Tom Cotton should avoid lectures about the importance of Congress and the White House speaking "with one voice when it comes to dealing with the Iranians." Unless the right-wing senator is deliberately trying to become a laughingstock, he should take a moment to acknowledge his lack of credibility on the subject.
 
As for Cotton's affection for up-or-down votes, I'm tempted to ask the senator, "Are you new here?" The answer, as it turns out, is, "Yes" -- the Arkansas Republican was only in the U.S. House for a year when he announced his Senate bid, and he's only been in the upper chamber for seven months.
 
In other words, Cotton may not realize that his own GOP colleagues effectively created a new standard in the Senate, mandating that practically every bill of any consequence needs a minimum of 60 votes to advance. If Cotton disapproves, he can blame Mitch McConnell.
 
Of course, the Arkansan's press release yesterday serves as a reminder of just how poorly the debate is going for the far-right. The Republican target in the Senate has always been 67 votes -- in part because they saw 60 votes as a foregone conclusion. As of this week, however, even that goal is in doubt. 
 
Cotton added yesterday, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) "is obstructing because he is scared." Someone's scared, but I don't think it's Harry Reid.