The Rachel Maddow Show Weekdays at 9PM


... more Duration: {{video.duration.momentjs}}

Rachel Maddow StoriesRSS

select from:

E.g., 6/30/2017
E.g., 6/30/2017

Thursday's Campaign Round-Up, 6.29.17

06/29/17 12:00PM

Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.

* As Congress prepares for a week-long break, the AFL-CIO is preparing a media campaign in five states -- Alaska, Ohio, West Virginia, Nevada, and Maine -- against the Republicans' health care plan.

* Donald Trump's fundraiser last night at his own D.C. hotel reportedly raised in upwards of $10 million for his re-election campaign and the Republican National Committee.

* Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.), the current chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, reportedly told a group of donors that the current "political climate" is interfering with the party's recruiting efforts for the 2018 cycle.

* Our Revolution, the organization created by Bernie Sanders in the wake of his presidential campaign, will now be led by former state Sen. Nina Turner of Ohio. She's replacing Jeff Weaver, who managed the Vermont senator's 2016 presidential bid.

* The day after Rep. Greg Gianforte (R-Mont.) physically assaulted a journalist and lied about it, the Republican reportedly received a campaign contribution from Frederick G. Smith, the vice president and director of Sinclair Broadcasting Group.

read more

Republican Presidential candidate Donald Trump speaks at the NRA-ILA Leadership Forum on May 20, 2016 in Louisville, Ky. (Photo by Mark Peterson/Redux for MSNBC)

The NRA finds new ways to stoke the fires of the culture war

06/29/17 11:42AM

The National Rifle Association has a challenge: the far-right organization has allies running the federal government. In practical terms, that leaves NRA members with very little to fear, at least in political terms. The chances of a far-right Congress approving gun reforms that will be signed into law by Donald Trump are zero.

To be sure, the NRA still has to contend with public opinion. A new Quinnipiac poll, for example, released yesterday, found that 94% of Americans -- including 93% of Republicans and 92% of voters in gun-owning households -- support requiring background checks for all gun purchases.

But the fact remains that the NRA's Republican allies will simply ignore public attitudes on the subject -- a fact the NRA's members are no doubt aware of.

How, then, will the group keep its supporters engaged? By pointing to a different enemy: Democratic officials may not be in position to approve any national policies, but there are still liberals out there who, the NRA says in a new video, need to be defeated in a culture war:

"They use their media to assassinate real news. They use their schools to teach children that their president is another Hitler. They use their movie stars and singers and comedy shows and award shows to repeat their narrative over and over again. And then they use their ex-president to endorse 'the resistance.'

"All to make them march. Make them protest. Make them scream 'racism' and 'sexism' and 'xenophobia' and 'homophobia.' To smash windows, burn cars, shut down interstates and airports, bully and terrorize the law-abiding -- until the only option left is for the police to do their jobs and stop the madness.

"And when that happens, they'll use it as an excuse for their outrage. The only way we stop this, the only way we save our country and our freedom, is to fight this violence of lies with the clenched fist of truth.

"I'm the National Rifle Association of America. And I'm freedom's safest place."

It's quite a worldview.

read more

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., heads to the Senate subway following a vote in the Capitol on Jan. 8, 2015. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Getty)

Targeting Obama, Republicans play the Russia blame game poorly

06/29/17 10:52AM

Donald Trump and his White House recently settled on a new talking point to respond to Russia's attack on the American election: everyone should blame Barack Obama. As Politico noted, the president's Republican allies on Capitol Hill are reading from the same script.

Several Republicans used a Senate hearing Wednesday to admonish former President Barack Obama for failing to stop Russia's hacking of the 2016 presidential campaign, echoing a narrative that President Donald Trump has promoted in recent days.

A number of lawmakers went after Obama for not being more publicly vocal about the Russian-ordered hacking, which U.S. intelligence agencies said targeted campaigns, Democratic Party organizations and state election databases in the months before Election Day.

Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), targeting the former president, said, "He stood idly by in the 2016 election."

To the extent that reality still matters in this debate, the idea that Obama "stood idly by" is wrong. There's room for a debate about whether the former administration could have, or should have, done more, but the Democratic president took a variety of actions, and likely would've done far more if he didn't feel constrained by circumstances.

But if Republicans are looking for a leading U.S. official who actually "stood idly by" in the face of the most serious attack on the United States since 9/11, they won't have to look far.

read more

Smoke rises after an U.S.-led air strike in the Syrian town of Kobani on Oct. 8, 2014.

Trump's ISIS plan looks awfully similar to Obama's ISIS plan

06/29/17 10:11AM

It was just a couple of years ago that Donald Trump said he had a secret plan to defeat ISIS. "Unfortunately, I'll probably have to tell at some point [what the plan is], but there is a method of defeating them quickly and effectively and having total victory," Trump said. He added at the time, "All I can tell you it is a foolproof way of winning."

Soon after, Trump said he'd like to share his secret plan, but if he did, other presidential candidates would steal his amazing national security solution. He told the Des Moines Register in June 2015, "The problem with politics is if I tell you right now, everyone else is going to say, 'Wow, what a great idea.' You're going to have 10 candidates go and use it, and they're going to forget where it came from, which is me. But no, I have an absolute way of defeating ISIS."

As regular readers know, Trump was lying. The president effectively admitted as much in January, when he signed an executive directive on the matter, asking his national security team to come up with some kind of anti-ISIS plan for him.

There have been hints in recent months that Trump's plan would mirror the Obama administration's plan -- which is to say, the plan Trump said was a failure -- and the New York Times reported in March that, with limited exceptions, Trump administration officials showed little interest in abandoning Obama's strategy.

With the "new" plan nearly complete, the Washington Post reports today that the coming policy looks an awful lot like the old policy.

The Pentagon is putting the final touches on a promised new counter-Islamic State strategy for Syria and Iraq, and it looks very much like the one the Obama administration pursued, according to senior defense officials.

As Retired Admiral James Stavridis, an NBC News analyst, put it a few months ago, "The current plan to defeat the Islamic State is just like that old saying: Plan B is just, 'Try harder at Plan A.'"

read more

Sen. Bob Corker

Some Senate Republicans think twice about health plan's tax cuts

06/29/17 09:21AM

The basic description of the Senate Republicans' health care plan fits nicely into a 30-second campaign ad: the plan intends to cut taxes on the wealthy, and pay for them with cuts to Medicaid, forcing millions into the ranks of the uninsured.

There's a reason this thing is polling at 12%.

It's so tough to defend that Bloomberg Politics reported yesterday that "several" Senate Republicans have begun publicly questioning the value of including big tax breaks in the GOP plan.

[Republican Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee], who faces re-election in 2018, voiced hesitation with tax cuts for the highest earners.... "I want to make sure that we're not in a situation where we're cutting taxes for the wealthy and at the same time, basically, for lower income citizens, passing a larger burden on to them," Corker said.

Told that what he described is what the CBO projects would happen, he responded, "So that needs to be overcome then, doesn't it?"

The same report added that Maine's Susan Collins and South Dakota's Mike Rounds "both criticized the draft bill released by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell for repealing a surtax on net investment income imposed under Obamacare."

In the face of these complains, the Washington Examiner added that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) "is said to be considering a change to the tax cuts."

We'll know soon enough what, if anything, will come of this -- GOP leaders intend to have a revamped bill finished by tomorrow -- but this element of the fight creates a difficult challenge. If the tax breaks are dramatically scaled back, it would free up additional money for benefits and make it easier for Republicans to impose fewer burdens on the public.

On the other hand, Republicans love tax cuts, especially for the wealthy. It is, to a very real extent, the point of this entire endeavor.

read more

Image: President Trump Signs Executive Order In Oval Office

Donald Trump picks a fight over Medicaid he cannot win

06/29/17 08:41AM

At a White House event yesterday, a reporter asked Donald Trump to comment on the Medicaid cuts in the Republican health care bill. "It's going to great," the president replied. "This will be great for everybody."

As a rule, "everybody" is a word Trump should probably avoid. He did, after all, promise Americans, "We're going to have insurance for everybody" -- which is a commitment he abandoned soon after taking office.

Nevertheless, Trump's clumsy comments yesterday about the underlying issue is part of a broader area of concern for Republicans. Their plan intends to gut Medicaid -- a popular program that covers more Americans than any other program -- by hundreds of billions of dollars. The GOP response so far has been to insist that Medicaid cuts aren't actually Medicaid cuts. As USA Today noted, Trump joined the chorus last night.

President Trump accused Democrats of lying about the projected Medicaid cuts in the Republican health care plan, but they didn't. They're just counting different things.

As Senate leadership struggles to find on a way forward for the controversial health care plan after coming up short of the votes it needed to pass before July 4 recess, Trump defended the proposal, tweeting that "Democrats purposely misstated Medicaid under new Senate bill - actually goes up."

Yes, this is the line Republicans have decided to stick to: it only looks like they're cutting Medicaid by hundreds of billions of dollars, but that's a ruse concocted by those rascally Democrats.

In reality, of course, it's not just Dems who've raised concerns about the Medicaid cuts; plenty of prominent Republicans, including Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Dean Heller (R-Nev.), have echoed the point.

But more importantly, a semantics debate about the meaning of the word "cut" is ridiculous, even by 2017 standards.

read more


Republican senators grow weary of Trump's health care illiteracy

06/29/17 08:00AM

After meeting with Donald Trump this week, a Republican senator told the New York Times the president "did not have a grasp of some basic elements" of the GOP's health care plan. This followed a Weekly Standard report, which said "several" Senate Republicans who've spoken to Trump found he had "little apparent understanding of the basic principles of the reforms and virtually no understanding of the details."

The Washington Post reported today that "seasoned senators," after speaking with Trump, "saw a president unable to grasp policy details or the obstacles ahead."

Trump's illiteracy on the substance of governing may not be new, but his ostensible allies appear to be increasingly weary of the amateur president's ignorance -- enough to share concerns with multiple media outlets -- and it's starting to matter more.

Consider this anecdote from a Politico piece published last night.

Rand Paul and Susan Collins are on opposite ends of the Republican Party when it comes to health care, yet somehow the two senators both left this week's Obamacare repeal meetings with President Donald Trump thinking he's on their side.

Paul wants to gut as much of Obamacare as possible and recalled after his one-on-one meeting that the president "realizes that moderates have gotten everything so far" on the health care talks. The centrist Collins, on the other hand, left a larger Tuesday gathering with the president sure that he still wants to make the bill's health care offerings more robust, explaining that "he did leave me with that impression."

There's no reason to believe the senators are giving false accounts of their conversations with the president. On the contrary, it's very easy to believe their versions of events.

What's more, Trump probably wasn't misleading them, either, at least not deliberately. He very likely heard them out, and said their position sounded like the sort of thing he could support.

But therein lies the rub: the president has no idea what he's talking about and doesn't want to make an effort to get up to speed.

read more

EPA sidelining science under Trump, Pruitt

EPA sidelining science under Trump, Pruitt

06/28/17 09:43PM

Rachel Maddow looks at the dubious job Donald Trump's EPA is doing as a steward of the environment and tells the story of Deborah Swackhamer, chair of the E.P.A.’s Board of Scientific Counselors, who was pressured by an EPA official to change her testimony to Congress. watch

Wednesday's Mini-Report, 6.28.17

06/28/17 05:30PM

Today's edition of quick hits:

* It's not over: "Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is aiming to send a revised version of his health-care bill to the Congressional Budget Office as soon as Friday, according to Capitol Hill aides and lobbyists."

* Sen. John McCain was asked today whether a deal on health care is possible by Friday. He replied, "Pigs could fly!" As it turns out, McCain used nearly the exact same words in January when asked about whether he could vote for Rex Tillerson's nomination. The senator voted to confirm him soon after.

* I hope you saw last night's segments on this: "A firm owned by former Trump campaign chair Paul Manafort disclosed more than $17 million in payments for its work in Ukraine in a Foreign Agents Registration Act filing late Tuesday. The payments all occurred well before Manafort joined the Trump campaign."

* Indefensible: "Some Texas children with special needs ... have lost critical services since the state implemented $350 million in Medicaid cuts to speech, occupational and physical therapy in December. In Texas, reimbursement offered to providers fell up to 50 percent for certain therapy procedures, said Rachel Hammon, president of Texas Association of Homecare and Hospice. Clinics closed and therapists quit. The Texas cuts are separate from Republican proposals now before Congress, which academics say could cut federal Medicaid spending as part of a law to replace the Affordable Care Act."

* This is quite a story: "Representative Chris Collins suffered a paper loss of [$16.7 million] after Innate Immunotherapeutics Ltd. said a mid-stage trial of its experimental treatment for multiple sclerosis showed no effect in helping patients. The New York congressman is the biggest shareholder, with 17 percent of the Australian drugmaker. After the data was reported Tuesday, the shares fell 92 percent in Sydney to less than 5 Australian cents."

* Remember when Trump said the Ex-Im Bank shouldn't exist? "Financier Anthony Scaramucci, a prominent surrogate and fundraiser during President Donald Trump's campaign for the White House, has joined the embattled Export-Import Bank in a top position. Scaramucci became a senior vice president and chief strategy officer at the agency on June 19."

read more


About The Rachel Maddow Show

Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.



Latest Book