In August 2011, less than a week before launching a presidential campaign, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) partnered with a series of religious right groups to host a big prayer rally in Houston. It was called, simply, "The Response."
The event's website said at the time that "The Response" has adopted the American Family Association statement of faith, "including the infallibility of the Bible, the centrality of Jesus Christ, and the eternal damnation that awaits nonbelievers." Organizers said non-Christians were welcome -- in the hopes that they would be convinced to convert to Christianity.
The event, like Perry's presidential campaign, proved to be underwhelming. But more than three years later, "The Response" is ready for yet another massive prayer rally, hosted once again by a far-right governor with national aspirations.
Gov. Bobby Jindal on Wednesday defended his role as headline speaker at a prayer rally on Louisiana State University's campus next month that has drawn the ire of protesters who say the group hosting the event promotes discrimination and an anti-gay agenda.
The Jan. 24 prayer rally is expected to draw thousands of people to LSU's campus for what Jindal, a Roman Catholic, describes in an invitation as "a time of worship, prayer, fasting and repentance."
"Let's be clear about what this is. This is an opportunity for people across denominational lines to come together to pray," Jindal told reporters this week. "It's not a political event, it's a religious event."
Asked if he agrees with the agenda espoused by the American Family Association, an extremist group that's helping organize the event, the governor told reporters, "The left likes to try to divide and attack Christians."
First, that's ridiculously wrong. And second, notice how Jindal didn't answer the question.
Conservative critics of President Obama's new Cuba policy are in a tough spot. The right can't argue in support of the old policy because it obviously didn't work. Republicans can't point to public attitudes because most Americans have supported a change for years. Conservatives can't say this will adversely affect the U.S. relationship with other countries because the exact opposite is true.
And so folks like Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), and others are instead making an argument based on Cuba's horrendous record on human rights. This case is certainly based on reality -- the Castro regime has been brutal and dictatorial -- but as Digby argued yesterday, it's hard not to marvel at the Republicans' timing.
[Y]ou have to wonder if any of these people have the slightest bit of self-awareness. Do they have any idea how hollow their words sound when just a week ago they were condemning our own government for releasing a report that documented America's own human rights abuses?
It's absolutely true that the most notorious prison camp on the planet is in Cuba — but it's run by the U.S. government. Guantánamo Bay is still open for business and its practices are still condemned the world over for its mistreatment of prisoners. And Ted Cruz's lugubrious hand-wringing over the Cuban government holding people without due process would certainly be a lot more convincing if Americans hadn't been holding innocent people for years in Cuba with no hope of ever leaving.
Referencing a Rubio tweet, Digby added, "To think that just last week the man who is preaching today about America's commitment to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness was exhorting us all to thank the people who used torture techniques like 'rectal feeding' on prisoners in American custody."
Those who condemn Castro's human-rights abuses are on firm ground. Those who also celebrate torture as a tool of U.S. national security are not.
It seems like every six months or so, there's a new round of chatter about House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) facing a threat from within his own ranks. The last flurry was in April, when there were widespread reports about conservative Republican lawmakers "showing the early signs of a speakership revolt."
Rep. Tim Huelskamp (R-Kan.), one of the Speaker's fiercest foes, said at the time, "I think pretty well everybody's figured Mr. Boehner's going to be gone."
In reality, he's really not "going to be gone," though Andrew Kaczynski reported yesterday on the latest scuttlebutt from Boehner's intra-party critics.
Republican North Carolina Rep. Walter Jones says he and a group of 16 to 18 Republicans plan to challenge John Boehner during the next election to be Speaker of the House.
"Right now, I've been meeting with a small group, and we -- about 16, 18 -- and we're hoping to have a name of a sitting member of Congress that we can call out their name," Jones said on the North Carolina-based Talk of the Town radio program.
Though Jones wasn't specific, the North Carolina Republican claims he's met with "one individual" who might be willing to challenge Boehner for the Speaker's gavel. "We're gonna have a conference call the week after Christmas with our little group to see where we are," Jones added.
I think we already know where they are: in a position to lose a fight that serves no purpose.
Many of President Obama's critics on the right routinely focus on the global stage as a basis of their rebukes. Obama's foreign policy, they argue, has rattled international confidence in the United States and weakened respect for us abroad. It's hard to lead the free world, the Republican argument goes, if we're not as respected or as admired as we once were.
The argument, in general, is nonsense. America's stature quantifiably slipped during the Bush/Cheney era, but there's ample evidence that Obama has helped repair our standing in recent years.
That said, even if we take the right's rhetoric at face value, conservatives should be absolutely thrilled with the White House this week -- with one big announcement, the president has apparently boosted the United States' reputation throughout an important part of the world. The New York Times had a fascinating report on this:
President Obama has been lambasted for spying in Brazil, accused of being a warmonger by Bolivia, dismissed as a "lost opportunity" by Argentina, and taunted in Nicaragua by calls for Latin America to draw up its own list of state sponsors of terrorism -- with the United States in the No. 1 spot.
But now Latin American leaders have a new kind of vocabulary to describe him: They are calling him "brave," "extraordinary" and "intelligent."
After years of watching his influence in Latin America slip away, Mr. Obama suddenly turned the tables this week by declaring a sweeping détente with Cuba, opening the way for a major repositioning of the United States in the region.
This is no small development. As Latin America has soured on the United States, China has sought to take advantage, expanding Chinese ties and influence in the region, and positioning itself as a long-term partner for countries throughout Central and South America.
With one breakthrough shift, years in the making, the Obama White House has taken an enormous step towards shaking off our imperialist reputation and vastly improving our standing.
A couple of years ago, voters in Colorado and the state of Washington approved landmark drug laws, making recreational marijuana use legal for adults. The state measures were at odds with federal statutes, but the Obama administration gave Colorado and Washington its blessing to proceed.
Two years later, some of Colorado's neighbors are looking to the federal courts to undo what the states' voters did.
Two heartland states filed the first major court challenge to marijuana legalization on Thursday, saying that Colorado's growing array of state-regulated recreational marijuana shops was piping marijuana into neighboring states and should be shut down.
The lawsuit was brought by attorneys general in Nebraska and Oklahoma, and asks the United States Supreme Court to strike down key parts of a 2012 voter-approved measure that legalized marijuana in Colorado for adult use and created a new system of stores, taxes and regulations surrounding retail marijuana.
According to the lawsuit, crafted by Republican state attorneys general in Nebraska and Oklahoma, Colorado created a "scheme" that circumvents federal law and allows pot to flow into neighboring states. This in turn undermines their prohibition laws, "draining their treasuries, and placing stress on their criminal justice systems."
The suit added, "The Constitution and the federal antidrug laws do not permit the development of a patchwork of state and local pro-drug policies and licensed distribution schemes throughout the country."
In other words, far-right GOP state attorneys general want federal courts to order federal law enforcement to enforce federal laws, whether voters in the Centennial State like it or not.
It's always interesting to see where conservative governing principles start and end, isn't it?
Rachel Maddow reports new details of how President Obama negotiated directly with Cuba's President Castro to remake U.S./Cuba relations, the role of Pope Francis, secret meetings, and the American spy returned to the U.S. in the deal. watch
Rachel Maddow reports on how the United States is weighing its options as it pieces together clues that North Korea is behind the hack of Sony Pictures and the threats against movie theaters, mindful that North Korea would like to draw the U.S. into war. watch
Rachel Maddow alerts viewers to an upcoming special presentation of All In with Chris Hayes in which Hayes visits a shooting range to test out the one kind of gun the NRA does not want sold in America. watch
Rachel Maddow reports that the Arizona school board that was considering tearing pages out of honors biology textbooks over objections to the lesson on reproduction have changed their minds, leaving ArizonaHonorsBiology.com available. watch
Michael McFaul, former U.S ambassador to Russia, talks with Rachel Maddow about the dire economic circumstances President Putin has placed Russia in, the danger to the world economy of a Russian crash, and what options remain open for Putin to recover. watch