Before Hillary Clinton's remarks late yesterday in Nevada on immigration policy, reform proponents weren't entirely sure what to expect. As Rachel noted on the show last night, Clinton adopted a decidedly moderate posture on immigration during her first campaign eight years ago, and there was uncertainty about how far she'd be willing to go this year.
But as Alex Seitz-Wald reported, the Democratic frontrunner answered those questions emphatically in the Silver State.
In perhaps the strongest remarks on immigration of her entire career, Hillary Clinton vowed Tuesday evening to "do everything I possibly can" to help immigrants – including going beyond President Obama's executive actions to extend deportation relief to undocumented immigrants. [...]
The Democratic presidential candidate hit almost every issue on the immigration reform activist's wish-list. She called for more humane detention practices, making it easier for families to plead their case for leniency, and took on the private prison industry. And crucially, she said she supported President Obama's actions to shield millions of immigrants from deportation – and promised to go do even more. "If Congress continues to refuse to act, as president, I would do everything possible under the law to go even further," she said.
According to the transcript made available from the Democrat's campaign, Clinton said during the roundtable meeting, "The American people support comprehensive immigration reform not just because it's the right thing to do -- and it is -- but because it will strengthen families, strengthen our economy, and strengthen our country. That's why we can't wait any longer, we can't wait any longer for a path to full and equal citizenship. Now, this is where I differ with everybody on the Republican side.
"Make no mistake: Today not a single Republican candidate, announced or potential, is clearly and consistently supporting a path to citizenship. Not one. When they talk about "legal status," that's code for 'second-class status.'"
Dara Lind noted that Clinton's speech told progressive activists "exactly what they hoped they'd hear," and turned out to be "much better than they expected to hear." BuzzFeed's report added that the former Secretary of State "just won over much of the skeptical immigrant activist movement."
If this seems like a familiar political dynamic, it's not your imagination.
Rachel Maddow reviews the list of arguably-credible Republican contenders for the 2016 presidential nomination (at least 22 of them) and reports on the genuinely daunting challenge for the party to organize a fair system for them to debate each other. watch
U.S. Secretary of Transportation, Anthony Foxx, talks with Rachel Maddow about new safety rules for oil trains and the challenge of balancing public transparency about the volatile shipments with the need for security. watch
Rachel Maddow reviews new rules from the Department of Transportation meant to make the transportation of crude oil by rail safer, but critics want changes to take effect faster and decry new provisions reducing transparency of shipment schedules. watch
* An important first: "Secretary of State John Kerry made a brief but symbolically significant stopover in Somalia on Tuesday, becoming the highest-ranking American official to visit the war-ravaged country since a disastrous foray by American forces more than 20 years ago."
* Baltimore: "In her first visit to Baltimore since riots roiled the city, Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Tuesday met with community members and law enforcement officials in an effort to help ease tensions."
* The last of the National Guard troops who were deployed to Baltimore are expected to be gone today.
* Joint Chiefs: "President Barack Obama will name the commandant of the Marines, Gen. Joseph Dunford Jr., as the 19th chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, senior defense officials told NBC News on Monday.... If he's confirmed by the Senate, Dunford, the Marines' 36th commandant, or commanding general, would replace Army Gen. Martin Dempsey as the nation's top military officer in October when his tour is completed."
* Mac Thornberry on Jade Helm 15: "The chairman of the House Armed Services committee called concerns about a special forces training exercise in Texas 'silly' on Monday, dismissing conspiracy theories of impending martial law."
* Louie Gohmert on Jade Helm 15: "Tea party darling Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) on Tuesday demanded that the U.S. military alter a planned training exercise that some conspiracy theorists believe is cover for a possible takeover of the Lone Star state."
* Saving lives sounds like a good idea: "The Obama Administration's hotly debated plan to reduce heat-trapping carbon dioxide from the nation's power plants will save about 3,500 lives a year by cutting back on other types of pollution as well, a new independent study concludes."
* Evidence-based conclusions rarely affect political debates: "The State Department said Monday it has no evidence that any actions taken by Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton when she was secretary of state were influenced by donations to the Clinton Foundation or former President Bill Clinton's speaking fees."
Do you ever see a news headline and find yourself saying, out loud, "Uh oh"? This is not an uncommon occurrence at my desk, and just such an occasion happened this afternoon.
The Haaretz headline read, "Senator Lindsey Graham: Everything that starts with 'Al' in the Mideast is bad news." Like I said, uh oh.
"Everything that starts with 'Al' in the Middle East is bad news," said U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina at an AIPAC dinner in Boston on Monday. "Al-Qaida, Al-Nusra, Al-Qaida in the Arab Peninsula," said the senator, who may be running for president. [...]
The problem -- linguistically -- with Graham's comment is that "Al" is the definite article in Arabic (i.e. equivalent to English's "the"), and usually appears before most Arabic proper nouns, especially place and personal names.
Lindsey Graham is not without his folksy charms, and on Capitol Hill, the South Carolina Republican has developed a well-deserved reputation for being good humored.
But I'm going to hope that this is one joke Graham wishes he could take back.
Earlier this year, the Republican National Committee unveiled a schedule of party-approved primary debates for the 2016 presidential race. Between August and February, GOP candidates will meet for nine debates, a third of which will be hosted by a Fox network. (The Democratic National Committee unveiled its smaller debate schedule today.)
Almost immediately, however, a problem emerged: how exactly are Republicans going to hold debates for the largest field of candidates in American presidential history? Zeke Miller reported yesterday on the challenge, which relevant players are still working on.
Largely out of view, executives and journalists from Fox and CNN, with input from the national party, are weighing the entrance criteria for the first two debates. Among the options being considered is using polling as a rough inclusionary test, followed by a fundraising metric -- dollars raised or the number of individual donors activated. All of these things are in flux as the networks and the national party struggle with the largest plausible debate field in history.
"This is truly historic in that normally you are trying to get people into the debates and now you are trying to whittle people out of the debates," said one Republican operative familiar with the debate process. "You've never had more than 10 candidates in either party on a debate stage. You could get to at least 16 to 17 candidates and make a legitimate case for them being there -- easy."
That's actually a fairly conservative number. I'd say there are probably 14 candidates likely to compete for the Republican nomination: Jeb Bush, Scott Walker, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Mike Huckabee, Marco Rubio, Ben Carson, Chris Christie, Rick Perry, John Kasich, Rick Santorum, Lindsey Graham, Bobby Jindal, and Carly Fiorina.
We can probably add two former governors -- James Gilmore and George Pataki -- to the mix, along with John Bolton and Donald Trump. That's 18.
Two current governors -- Mike Pence and Rick Snyder -- certainly seem interested, as does former Gov. Bob Ehrlich. Peter King has publicly talked up the possibility, too, bringing us to a total of 22, enough to hold an 11-on-11 football scrimmage.
All of this, of course, leads to some practical questions, including who gets to participate in debates, but there's also an overarching question: why in the world is the Republican field so big?
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) may seem like yesterday's news in the world of Republican politics, not having won an election in 12 years and not having served in any public office in nearly nine years. But the preacher-turned-politician-turned-pundit-turned-politician-again still has a base of support and sees a national opportunity.
Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee from his hometown Tuesday announced his second run for president, declaring to an auditorium of cheers that he is ready to help take America "from hope to higher ground."
"I am a candidate for president of the United States," he said.
Huckabee put together a respectable showing in his 2008 race, but struggled to raise money, and failed to rally support outside the party's evangelical base. The Arkansan -- who now calls Florida home -- has held onto many of those supporters and enters the race as a credible, second-tier contender, leading much of the large GOP field.
But by most measures, Huckabee remains a factional candidate who will struggle to compete for his party's nomination.
Broadly speaking, Republican politics at the national level is comprised of three contingents: social conservatives (anti-gay, anti-abortion), economic conservatives (tax breaks for the rich, deregulation), and military hawks (more wars). The more a GOP presidential candidate can appeal to voters across the factions, the greater his or her chances of success.
Huckabee clearly excels with the religious right, which applauds his radical worldview on cultural and social issues, but the problem he can't shake is simple: the other two contingents aren't just backing other candidates; they actively despise Huckabee.
Today's installment of campaign-related news items that won't necessarily generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:
* Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R) will reportedly kick off his presidential campaign this afternoon. More on this story a little later this afternoon.
* In the new NBC/Wall Street Journalpoll, Jeb Bush leads his party's 2016 field at the national level with 23% support, followed by Marco Rubio with 18%, and Scott Walker at 14%.
* The NBC poll also found Hillary Clinton with the best favorability numbers of any national presidential candidate. The Democratic frontrunner also leads each of her Republican rivals in hypothetical general-election match-ups, by margins ranging from 4 points (vs. Rand Paul) to 10 points (vs. Scott Walker).
* Finally, note that President Obama's approval rating in the NBC poll ticked up to 48%, his strongest support in nearly two years. That's 13 points better than George W. Bush's standing at this point eight years ago, and it has the potential to make a big difference in the next election.
* A week after a few dozen House Republicans voted to delay protections for veterans against predatory lenders, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is launching "digital and direct mail ads" targeting some of the GOP lawmakers who sided with the banking industry.
* In Florida's open U.S. Senate race, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has already thrown its support behind Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-Fla.), despite the fact that the field is not yet settled. The endorsement was unwelcome news for Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.), who's expressed an interest in the statewide campaign.
The Associated Press recently ran a headline Gov. Bobby Jindal's (R) campaign team probably didn't want to see: "Jindal to leave Louisiana's next governor with budget mess."
The headline understated the case. The Republican governor's tax breaks failed to deliver the economic growth Jindal expected, and the resulting fiasco is just ugly -- the far-right policymaker inherited a healthy, $900 million budget surplus from his Democratic predecessor, but Jindal is wrapping up his second term struggling to fill a $1.6 billion budget hole.
But Bloomberg Politics reported yesterday that, despite these conditions, the likely Republican presidential candidate is prepared to protect certain expenses Jindal considers important. That includes, for example, protecting benefits for his favorite reality-TV show.
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, a potential Republican presidential candidate, is trying to close a $1.6 billion budget hole without touching as much as $415,000 per episode in tax breaks that may be due to "Duck Dynasty."
The A&E television reality show takes part in the nation's most generous entertainment-tax credit program. Jindal is proposing no changes, arguing that reducing such breaks is tantamount to raising taxes. The state approves enough incentives each year to make up at least $200 million in proposed cuts that led Louisiana State University to say that it may plan for insolvency.
Louisiana's fiscal outlook continues to deteriorate and state economic growth is among the worst of any state in the nation.
Ed Kilgore added that the closer one looks at Jindal's policy, the more egregious it appears.
Organizations like Planned Parenthood wouldn't be able to contract with the state of Michigan under a $37.86 billion budget passed by the House of Representatives Tuesday. [...]
Amendment WW adopted Tuesday would amend state law to keep the state from contracting "with an organization which provides elective abortions, abortion counseling or abortion referrals." The amendment also bans organizations under contract with the state from contracting with the same types of organizations.
The report from MLive Media quoted one GOP leader who said "multiple members of the House Republican caucus expressed concern about state dollars going to support Planned Parenthood."
OK, and exactly how much state money is currently going to support Planned Parenthood? Well, in the most recent Michigan budget, the grand total was $0. In the budget before that, it was $0.
Michigan Republicans, however, are unsatisfied with this, pushing a measure to prevent Planned Parenthood from ever receiving public funds -- even for health services that have nothing to do with abortion.
Regardless, the GOP's campaign against Planned Parenthood became a national issue in advance of the 2012 campaign -- when the so-called "Republican war on women" was taking shape -- and it's clear that the party's focus hasn't changed in advance of the 2016 campaign.
Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.
Rachel Maddow LIVE
Speak out! Make your voice heard by tagging your posts #maddow