In the wake of this week's shooting in Virginia of two journalists, President Obama mentioned in an interview, "What we know is that the number of people who die from gun-related incidents around this country dwarfs any deaths that happen through terrorism." As a simple matter of arithmetic, Obama's assessment is plainly true.
But Republican presidential hopeful Chris Christie wasn't impressed with the factual observation. "I don't know that anybody in America believes that they feel more threatened by this than they feel a threat by ISIS or by other terrorist groups around the world," the New Jersey governor said on Fox News.
It's a curious approach to the debate. For Christie, the president may be right, but the facts don't "feel" true. The governor doesn't know anyone who actually believes the truth -- statistically speaking, reality tells us Americans really are more threatened by gun violence than international terrorism -- and as such, the facts are somehow less important than the perception.
But this was the line that really stood out for me.
Gov. Chris Christie (R-N.J.) said Thursday that enforcing existing gun laws should take precedence over new legislation, a day after the deadly shooting of two journalists during a live broadcast.
"I'll tell you what I am more scared of, I'm more scared of criminals than I am of guns," the 2016 presidential contender said during an interview on CNBC's "Squawk Box."
That seems like a line that would score well with focus groups, but it doesn't mean much,
Call it a public display of political affection: Sen. Ted Cruz has invited Donald Trump to Washington next month for a rally against the Iran nuclear deal.
The two Republican rivals are set to appear at an event organized by the Tea Party Patriots, the Center for Security Politics, and the Zionist Organization of America, according to the Cruz campaign.
The event is tentatively set for September 9th, which should be shortly before Congress votes on legislation that would, if successful, derail the international nuclear agreement with Iran.
By any modern standard, it's quite unusual for rival candidates, running for the same party nomination at the same time, to team up like this, but in this case, neither Ted Cruz nor Donald Trump has much to lose. The far-right senator, who made the initial invitation to his ostensible foe, obviously wants to woo Trump supporters in the event the GOP frontrunner stumbles, and an event like this will help solidify Cruz's broader goals.
It's also largely the opposite of the strategy Lindsey Graham and Rick Perry tried for a while -- instead of making headlines by getting on Trump's bad side, drawing his ire, Cruz will stay in the spotlight by effectively partnering with the New York developer.
Trump, meanwhile, will get to be in front of the cameras for a big D.C. spectacle. Trump likes being in front of the cameras for big spectacles.
The big winners, however, may be Democratic supporters of the Iran deal.
Rachel Maddow explains that, crazy as it may seem, Russia is bulldozing and incinerating large quantities of imported food in retaliation for sanctions imposed by Western countries for Russia's invasion of Ukraine. watch
Steve Schale, a political strategist and adviser to the Draft Biden 2016 Committee, talks with Rachel Maddow about the considerations being made ahead of a possible 2016 run by Vice President Joe Biden and how the decision affects the Democratic field. watch
Rachel Maddow looks back at the mishandling of the Katrina disaster by the Bush administration and talks with Marc Morial, president and CEO of the National Urban League about the pace and obstacles to recovery in New Orleans and what work remains. watch
Biden/Clinton numbers getting more headlines, but Qpiac also has Bernie Sanders beating both Trump and Jeb: http://t.co/4ZeAwRXGyN
* Presumably Monday's rhetoric from the right no longer applies? "United States stock markets on Thursday turned in a second day of strong gains, reversing many of the losses sustained early in the week when global markets tumbled."
* A decade later: "Years after then-presidential hopeful Barack Obama declared 'America failed the people of New Orleans and the Gulf Coast', he returns to the city to hail Hurricane Katrina recovery efforts and highlight the region's resilience in the face of massive devastation."
* In related news, Michael "Heckuva Job" Brown, of FEMA notoriety, is still trying to avoid history's blame.
* What a dreadful story: "An abandoned truck 'full of bodies' was found on the side of a highway in eastern Austria on Thursday. Police said the dead were thought to be refugees."
* Guns: "Walmart said on Wednesday that it would no longer sell high-powered rifles in its stores in the United States. The decision followed years of public pressure on the retailer to stop selling some of the most lethal weapons associated with many of the nation’s mass shootings."
* Pakistan's fear of India carries dangerous consequences: "A new report by two American think tanks asserts that Pakistan may be building 20 nuclear warheads annually and could have the world’s third-largest nuclear stockpile within a decade."
When looking at a presidential primary field of 17 candidates, there's no point in applying the usual standards for who's doing well and who's doing poorly. As a practical matter, the criteria comes down to this: if a candidate's support in the polls reaches double digits, he or she is arguably faring pretty well. Those with single-digit support have some work to do.
Donald Trump leads the crowded Republican pack with 28 percent, up from 20 percent in a July 30 national survey by the independent Quinnipiac University.... Ben Carson has 12 percent, with 7 percent each for former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida. [...]
"Donald Trump soars; Ben Carson rises; Jeb Bush slips and some GOP hopefuls seem to disappear. Trump proves you don't have to be loved by everyone, just by enough Republicans to lead the GOP pack," said Tim Malloy, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
Sure, in a crowded field, when one candidate is cruising well ahead of his rivals, he's inevitably going to get most of the attention. It's the blessing of frontrunner status -- you get the spotlight.
But the number that jumped out at me was 7%. That's where Jeb Bush stands as August nears its end. It's comparable to the 9% showing for the Florida Republican in the most recent Fox News poll.
Given recent history, this is arguably getting far less attention than it probably should be.
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) didn't just complain this week about the international nuclear agreement with Iran; he also targeted the nature of the Democratic support for the policy. Apparently, Senate Dems expect the Republican majority to get 60 votes for their plan -- and Cotton thinks that's outrageous.
"Harry Reid wants to deny the American people a voice entirely by blocking an up-or-down vote on this terrible deal," the right-wing freshman complained.
Ah yes, the ol' "up-or-down" vote -- the one thing the majority party loves, until it falls into the minority, at which point it rediscovers the "cooling saucer" metaphor, right up until it reclaims the majority and the cycle begins anew.
Cotton isn't alone, of course. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), upon learning of the likely Democratic filibuster, responded, "Are you kidding me?" Politicoreported today:
"Is that where they really want to be? Do they really want to vote to block consideration of ... probably the biggest foreign policy endeavor?" Corker said in an interview. "Do they want to be in a place where they voted to keep from going to the substance [of the Iran debate]?"
Corker may not have fully thought this one through.
Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.
* In a new national Quinnipiac poll, Donald Trump continues to dominate the Republican field with 28% support, followed by Ben Carson's 12%. Jeb Bush, Ted Cruz, and Marco Rubio are tied for third with 7% each, followed by Scott Walker is sixth place with 6%. The news is especially poor for Rand Paul, who's in 11th place in the poll with a woeful 2%.
* The same poll found Hillary Clinton leading Bernie Sanders in the race for the Democratic nomination, 45% to 22%, followed by Vice President Biden with 18%.
* Quinnipiac also found Clinton with modest leads over the top GOP candidates in hypothetical general-election match-ups. Biden enjoyed similar advantages over Republicans.
* Jeb Bush said of Donald Trump yesterday, "This guy is now the front-runner." I don't remember Bush saying this before.
* The Huffington Post reports that Trump has reportedly told "several top Republicans that he will swear off the possibility of an independent bid and commit to running his presidential campaign under the party's banner." It's a story worth keeping a close eye on.
* Priorities USA, a Clinton-aligned super PAC, has a tough new ad out this morning on Republican presidential candidates and their anti-immigrant rhetoric. The 30-second spot is reportedly set to air in Colorado, Florida, and Nevada.
It's been a strikingly ridiculous year for Maine Gov. Paul LePage (R). He tried to block dozens of legislative measures, before losing at the state Supreme Court and watching the bills become law as a result of his own incompetence. The Tea Party Republican is also mired in an abuse-of-power scandal -- LePage doesn't deny the allegations -- which may lead to his impeachment.
The governor's policies are taking their toll on the state; he's broached the subject of resigning; and Politico recently felt comfortable publishing a piece that asked whether LePage is "playing with a full deck."
It's against this backdrop that the Maine governor is thinking about parlaying his two statewide victories into a U.S. Senate campaign. The Bangor Daily Newsreported this week:
During an afternoon appearance Tuesday on a conservative talk radio show, Maine's Republican Gov. Paul LePage said he may run for the U.S. Senate in 2018. [...]
LePage said specifically he was thinking about challenging U.S. Sen. Angus King, an independent and former two-term governor, because King caucuses with Democrats in Washington.
The governor told radio host Howie Carr this week, "I'm thinking about it very strongly."
Keep in mind, it's entirely possible LePage, who won a second term last year in a three-way race, will have been driven from office in disgrace long before the 2018 election cycle. Indeed, the investigation that may lead to the governor's impeachment is ongoing and moving forward.
There may be 17 Republican presidential candidates, but that doesn't mean the party is offering broad ideological diversity. On the contrary, the massive GOP field features a legion of White House hopefuls who all say roughly the same thing on roughly the same issues. This is especially true on taxes -- the one issue on which all Republicans have been united.
Republican front-runner Donald Trump began to flesh out his economic vision for America, and it includes raising taxes on the wealthy.
Trump said during a Wednesday interview on Bloomberg's With All Due Respectthat he would like to change the tax code.
Trump sat down with Bloomberg Politics' Mark Halperin and John Heilemann, and surprisingly enough, he voiced his support for scrapping the carried-interest loophole, which taxes hedge-fund profits at a lower rate than usual income. Eliminating the Wall Street tax break been a priority for many Democrats for quite a while.
Trump went on to complain that multi-millionaires are currently "paying very little tax and I think it's outrageous." After stressing his support for middle-class tax breaks -- the Republican candidate has not yet outlined any specifics -- Trump added, "I know people in hedge funds that pay almost nothing and it's ridiculous, OK?"
So, Trump's prepared to raise his own taxes? "That's right. That's right. I'm OK with it," he replied. "You've seen my statements, I do very well, I don't mind paying some taxes."
In case it's not obvious, no other GOP candidate is proposing anything like this. On the contrary, most of the field is rushing to sign Grover Norquist's anti-tax pledge, vowing never to raise any tax on anyone by any amount at any time.
But Trump is clearly not like other Republicans. The question then becomes whether or not a position like this is going to hurt him.
The U.S. economy grew at a faster 3.7% annual pace in the second quarter, up from the initial estimate of growth at a 2.3% clip, the Commerce Department said Thursday. Economists polled by MarketWatch predicted gross domestic product would be revised up to 3.3%, but business investment was stronger than expected.
Note, this is a preliminary estimate that will be revised again next month.
While nearly all Americans want to see stronger economic growth, this morning's evidence of economic progress may bring unwelcome consequences from the Federal Reserve -- the Fed has long been expected to raise interest rates in the fall, though developments in China have led many to hope Janet Yellen and Co. will delay a rate hike. Today's report, however, may very well reinforce the Fed's original plans.
As for the politics, I'll be eager to hear the same Republicans who argued on Monday that Obama is crushing the economy turn around and argue today that the economic is gaining steam thanks to the GOP-led Congress and anticipation of a Republican White House in 2017. That's how this silly game is played, right? Heads I win, tails you lose?
The obvious problem for Republicans watching Donald Trump with dismay is that the New York developer is dominating in practically every poll. The less obvious problem is his influence over the Republican conversation -- and what happens when Trump's rivals try to keep up.
The GOP frontrunner, for example, took a fairly bold line on birthright citizenship: just because someone is born on American soil, Trump argued, doesn't make them an American citizen, 14th Amendment be damned. A new litmus test was born -- soon, every Republican was pressed on the same issue.
Some struggled more than others. Just ask Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R), who offered three very different answers over the course of six days.
Also note what happened when Fox News' Megyn Kelly asked Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to weigh in this week. Politicoreported:
"What would President Cruz do? Do American citizen children of two illegal immigrants, who are born here, the children, get deported under a President Cruz?" Kelly asked. Donald Trump, she said, "has answered that question explicitly."
"Megyn, I get that that's the question you want to ask," Cruz said. "That's also the question every mainstream media liberal journalist wants to ask."
After some dodges, the host asked, "Why is it so hard? Why don't you just say yes or no?"
Rather than answering, the far-right senator retreated to the usual rhetoric: officials "can have a conversation" about this after "we've secured the border."
This isn't nearly as good an answer as Cruz thinks it is.
Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.
Rachel Maddow LIVE
Speak out! Make your voice heard by tagging your posts #maddow