Show StoriesRSS

select from

E.g., 9/20/2014
E.g., 9/20/2014

Ahead on the 9/19/14 Maddow show

09/19/14 07:10PM

Tonight's guests:

  • Anne Gearan, Washington Post diplomatic correspondent
  • William Rhoden, New York Times sports columnist

Here's executive producer Cory Gnazzo with a preview of what we've got coming...

read more

Friday's Mini-Report, 9.19.14

09/19/14 05:30PM

Today's edition of quick hits:
* ISIS: "French warplanes conducted their first airstrikes against targets in northern Iraq just hours after the U.S. Senate approved arming and training Syrian rebels to enter the fight against Islamic State militants. Rafale fighters struck a logistics depot, which French President Francois Hollande declared 'entirely destroyed.'"
* It looks like Kobach has pulled the plug on a prolonged fight: "Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach has directed county election officials to start mailing ballots to voters overseas Saturday without having a Democratic nominee listed for the U.S. Senate."
* Following the Scottish vote against independence from the U.K., First Minister Alex Salmond, the head of the pro-independence Scottish National Party, announced he's stepping down.
* "It's On Us": "A new White House campaign aims to enlist communities -- and men in particular -- to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden both spoke Friday at the launch of 'It's On Us,' a campaign aimed to encourage bystander intervention and to give young men and women tools to help survivors of sexual assault."
* Will Europe take the CIA at its word? "The CIA has curbed spying on friendly governments in Western Europe in response to the furor over a German caught selling secrets to the United States.... Under the stand-down order, case officers in Europe largely have been forbidden from undertaking 'unilateral operations' such as meeting with sources they have recruited within allied governments."
* The search for Eric Frein continues: "On the seventh day of a manhunt for a survivalist suspected of killing a state police trooper, scores of police were trying to flush him out of the dense, swampy northeastern Pennsylvania woodland."
* In case you missed last night's 72-22 Senate vote: "After some last-minute drama on immigration, the Senate took care of Congress' last must-pass piece of business before the November elections -- keeping the government funded and providing authority for arming and training Syrian rebels in the fight against the terror group known as ISIS."
* More tragic gun violence: "A grandfather shot and killed his daughter and her six young children before killing himself at his home in north-central Florida on Thursday, the authorities said."
* Sanctions matter: "ExxonMobil has halted drilling on its platform in the Kara Sea and begun shutting down its $700-million joint venture with Russia's Rosneft energy giant to comply with U.S. sanctions that take effect next week, energy industry sources reported Friday."
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie attends a news conference in New York, N.Y. on Sept. 15, 2014. (Photo by Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)

Good news, bad news for Christie

09/19/14 04:42PM

Given all of our previous discussions about New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie's (R) bridge scandal, it's only fair to note, as Rachel did last night, new reporting that prosecutors have not yet tied the governor directly to the infamous misdeeds.
The U.S. Justice Department investigation into Gov. Chris Christie's role in the George Washington Bridge lane closure scandal has thus far uncovered no evidence indicating that he either knew in advance or directed the closure of traffic lanes on the span, federal officials tell NBC 4 New York.
The September 2013 closures -- where several entrance lanes to the George Washington Bridge in Fort Lee were shut down, causing a traffic nightmare for commuters -- has been the subject of several federal and state investigations.
Federal officials caution that the investigation that began nine months ago is ongoing and that no final determination has been made, but say that authorities haven't uncovered anything that indicates that Christie knew in advance or ordered the closure of traffic lanes.
We don't yet know the source of this leak or its veracity, but it may very well be entire true that prosecutors haven't directly tied Christie personally to the bridge closings. Indeed, as of late yesterday, the governor seemed to be feeling pretty good about his standing, as if this WNBC report exonerates him.
But even if we assume the report is accurate, and we also assume that federal prosecutors never close in on Christie personally in the investigation into this scandal, the governor and his allies may still not fully appreciate the broader circumstances.
The Arizona-Mexico border fence near Naco, Ariz., March 29, 2013.

GOP congressional candidate eyes 'laser' attacks at border

09/19/14 03:48PM

The race in North Carolina's congressional district isn't likely to be competitive. It's one of the reddest districts in a red state, and a conservative candidate named Mark Walker (R) is well on his way to becoming a freshman congressman next year.
And so it's of interest that Mr. Walker held an event in the district earlier this summer, where he fielded a question from a voter who asked about the possible use of military force "to secure our southern border." The congressional candidate replied:
"Well, my first answer for that is we need to utilize the National Guard as much as we can. But I will tell you, if you have foreigners who are sneaking in with drug cartels, to me that is a national threat.
"And if we've got to go laser or blitz somebody with a couple of fighter jets for a little while to make our point, I don't have a problem with that, either."
This actually drew considerable applause from attendees.
In fact, when the applause died down, someone in the audience added, "I hope you wouldn't have any qualms about starting up a little war with Mexico." Walker responded, "Well, we did it before, if we need to do it again, I don't have a qualm about it."
I realize that an anti-immigrant posture has become the norm in Republican politics, with many candidates fighting for position to be more extreme than the next, but North Carolina's Mark Walker, a Baptist minister by trade, may be the only GOP candidate in the nation who's open to literally starting a war with Mexico -- complete with lasers.
Michele Bachmann will be out of Congress at the end of the year, but the radical torch will be passed to a new generation of extremists soon enough.
Gov. Nathan Deal speaks at a news conference in the Capitol on Tuesday, July 5, 2011 in Atlanta.

An old conspiracy theory makes a comeback

09/19/14 01:05PM

We've probably all heard the saying, "A good craftsman never blames his tools." But with that in mind, I have a new maxim to remember: "A good political figure never blames the Bureau of Labor Statistics."
Back in 2012, when the U.S. unemployment rate dropped quickly, President Obama's critics came up with an explanation: administration officials had orchestrated an elaborate conspiracy. The right took this nonsense seriously for a while, though one AEI scholar eventually told conservatives such talk "should be confined to crazytown."
Two years later, some similar suggestions have entered the political bloodstream once again.
Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal, a Republican, says something fishy is going on with his state's unemployment numbers -- and he thinks federal bureaucrats may have something to do with it.
The state saw its unemployment rate tick upward in August despite what his administration describes as robust job growth that month.
At a public event Thursday, Deal described an inexplicable "influence" on the unemployment rate in Republican-led states.
The Republican governor, who's in the midst of a tough re-election fight, told reporters yesterday, "It's ironic that in a year in which Republican governors are leading some of the states that are making the most progress, that they almost, without exception, are classified as having a bump in their unemployment rates, whereas states that are under Democrat governors' control, they are all showing that their unemployment rate has dropped. And I don't know how you account for that. Maybe there is some influence here that we don't know about."
The Democratic Governors Association and Deal's rivals in Jason Carter's (D) campaign were eager to distribute a clip of the governor's comments.
Let's unpack this a bit because this is an important issue and the public should understand that Georgia's Republican chief executive is, at a minimum, being wildly irresponsible in trying to defend his record.

Friday's Campaign Round-Up, 9.19.14

09/19/14 12:00PM

Today's installment of campaign-related news items that won't necessarily generate a post of their own, but may be of interest to political observers:
* Another plagiarism controversy trips up a candidate: this time it's Wisconsin gubernatorial hopeful Mary Burke (D), whose economic plan includes text lifted from other candidates. Burke's office blamed a consultant who has since been fired.
* Rep. Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.), one of Congress' most vulnerable Democratic incumbents, picked up a welcome endorsement yesterday from the National Rifle Association. Democrats rarely get NRA endorsements.
* In Alaska's closely watched U.S. Senate race, the latest statewide poll shows incumbent Sen. Mark Begich (D) up by five over Dan Sullivan (R), 39% to 34%.
* On a related note, Republicans have now begun criticizing Begich in Alaska for only "pretending" to ride snowmobiles.
* Casino mogul Sheldon Adelson is apparently taking a renewed interest in the 2014 elections, donating $10 million to Karl Rove's attack operation, Crossroads GPS. Adelson also reportedly "promised a similar amount" to a conservative group called the American Action Network.
* There aren't too many vulnerable House Republicans this cycle, but Michigan Rep. Dan Benishek is one of them, and the National Republican Congressional Committee invested $1 million in air time to help bolster the incumbent.
Barack Obama, Edna Pemberton

Another GOP talking point on 'Obamacare' bites the dust

09/19/14 11:32AM

In April, President Obama stunned much of the political world with a striking announcement: 8 million Americans had enrolled through an exchange marketplace for health care coverage, well ahead of earlier projections. After a couple of months in which the Affordable Care Act didn't work, the enrollment figures were powerful evidence of a remarkable success story.
Republicans, slightly stunned, scrambled to come up with a new complaint. The White House, they argued, "cooked the books." The 8 million may sound impressive, GOP officials argued, but no one should take it seriously because we don't know how many consumers will pay their premiums. Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus said as many as a third of these Americans don't really count towards the overall tally.
In May, congressional Republicans were so invested in this talking point, they even released a painfully ridiculous "report" that was thoroughly discredited soon after its publication -- the GOP lawmakers were exposed as having publishing fraudulent claims.
The conservative talking points look even worse now.
The Obama administration said Thursday that 7.3 million people who bought private health insurance under the Affordable Care Act had paid their premiums and were still enrolled.
Marilyn B. Tavenner, the administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, disclosed the latest count at a hearing of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
In other words, a little over 91% of the 8 million consumers who enrolled through an ACA exchange marketplace ended up getting insurance and paying for it. Everything Republicans claimed and predicted about this figure turned out to be wrong -- which is a sentence I feel like I've typed quite a few times when it comes to Republicans and "Obamacare."
Of course, 7.3 million isn't exactly 8 million, and 91% isn't 100%. Is this cause for concern for those hoping to see the American system succeed?
Militant Islamist fighters parade on military vehicles along the streets of northern Raqqa province

At the intersection of a political campaign and a counter-terrorism campaign

09/19/14 10:56AM

On the one hand, the United States is in the midst of a political campaign season. On the other hand, the United States is also in the midst of an aggressive military campaign against Islamic State terrorists. There's apparently an ugly point at which the two intersect.
Evan McMorris-Santoro reported this week that the White House has made a conscious decision: "President Obama will not tout his war on ISIS on the campaign trail." Polls generally show support for the president's approach, but there's no appetite to even try to exploit this for partisan gain.
Congressional Republicans apparently feel differently.
[The National Republican Congressional Committee] airing TV ads on the issue, questioning whether Democrats are tough enough on terrorists (see here, here and here). It's 2002-2004 all over again! Here we are, six weeks from Election Day and the GOP is potentially going to close with a message on national security -- not on health care or the economy. Who would have thunk it 6 months ago?
To say this is getting ugly in a hurry is to understate matters. It arguably started in late August when Sen. Tom Udall's (D) Republican challenger in New Mexico featured footage of an ISIS beheading video in a campaign ad, but Republicans have only grown more aggressive since.
Image: Barack Obama

The difference between military commanders and the Commander in Chief

09/19/14 10:16AM

The Washington Post reported overnight that when it comes to U.S. efforts to combat Islamic State terrorists, President Obama and military leaders aren't necessarily on the same page.
Flashes of disagreement over how to fight the Islamic State are mounting between President Obama and U.S. military leaders, the latest sign of strain in what often has been an awkward and uneasy relationship.
Even as the administration has received congressional backing for its strategy, with the Senate voting Thursday to approve a plan to arm and train Syrian rebels, a series of military leaders have criticized the president's approach against the Islamic State militant group.
It's hard to say with confidence just how widespread the disagreements really are. For that matter, even among those military leaders voicing disagreement, there's a variety of opinions.
For his part, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel told the House Armed Services Committee yesterday that Pentagon leaders are in "full alignment" and in "complete agreement with every component of the president's strategy."
And that's fine, but let's not forget that it's not really their call. Pentagon leaders don't actually have to be in "complete agreement with every component of the president's strategy."
NBC's First Read noted yesterday, "Remember the battle cry of some Democrats during some of the darkest days of the Iraq war -- that Bush and Cheney were not listening to the commanders? Well, given where all the military leadership is on this strategy, it is now Obama, the Democrat, who is open to criticism that he is not listening to his commanders."
But there's no reason to necessarily see that as "criticism."

Regional differences on children, corporal punishment

09/19/14 09:32AM

Among the many recent controversies surrounding the National Football League is the case of Adrian Peterson, who was recently indicted for beating his 4-year-old son with a tree branch, which the player characterized as a form of discipline. A new NBC/Marist poll gauged public attitudes on this and related issues, and some of the results were unexpected.
For example, the poll asked respondents, "Do you think it is right or wrong for parents to discipline their children by striking them -- either with a paddle, switch, or belt?" Overall, 60% consider it wrong, while only 34% believe it's right. But like Judd Legum, I found the demographic differences amazing.
Every group of Americans, regardless of age, race, gender, education, marital status, or income felt largely the same way: striking children, respondents said, is wrong. But note what happens when the results are broken up by region:
It turns out, Southerners were literally the only group in the entire poll in which a majority of respondents said striking children is appropriate.
Senator John McCain speaks during a hearing in Washington

McCain vs. McCain on ground troops

09/19/14 08:48AM

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) seemed disgusted, and perhaps a little hysterical, this week when condemning President Obama for targeting Islamic State terrorists without U.S. ground troops. "It's going to take an army to beat an army," Graham told Fox News, adding, "I will not let this president suggest to the American people we can outsource our security and this is not about our safety.... This president needs to rise to the occasion before we all get killed back here at home."
It was of interest, then, when Amanda Terkel reported that the South Carolina Republican, as recently as a few months ago, had effectively argued the opposite. "I don't think we need boots on the ground," Graham told Fox News on June 10. "I don't think that is an option worth consideration."
Now that President Obama agrees with Lindsey Graham I, Lindsey Graham II is outraged.
But as it turns out, the South Carolinian isn't alone. This week, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) has been in high dudgeon, demanding a more expansive U.S. military operation against ISIS in Syria, though a Democratic source alerted me overnight to comments McCain made to msnbc's Andrea Mitchell on June 13.
"I think you have to explain to the American people what kind of a threat that an ISIS takeover of Iraq would pose to the United States of America. Can you imagine a caliphate or a center of violent Muslim extremism dedicated to attacking the United States, the consequences of that? That has to be explained to the American people.
"I would also explain to the American people that I do not envision a scenario where ground combat troops are on the ground."
A few moments later, McCain added, "I would not commit to putting Americans boots on the ground."
This sounds awfully similar to what the president is saying now, to McCain's great consternation.