In Republican circles, James Baker is in a unique position: he's a grown-up. In a radicalized party filled with insurgent voices, Baker is an elder statesman with the kind of credibility and stature most political figures strive for but few achieve.
It's what happens when someone serves as Reagan's White House chief of staff and Treasury secretary, as well as serving as Secretary of State in the Bush/Quayle administration, where he assembled the international coalition that fought the first Gulf War.
With this recent history in mind, it was an important development when Baker publicly criticized Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's recent antics, calling out the Israeli leader for "diplomatic missteps and political gamesmanship." Baker also made clear that he was unimpressed with Netanyahu's commitment to the peace process and his inflexible opposition to nuclear diplomacy with Iran.
This should have been a wake-up call to Republicans -- they can hate the president, but when a foreign ally shows brazen disrespect for the United States, there's nothing wrong with Americans from both parties speaking out.
When former Secretary of State James A. Baker III accused Israel's leader this week of undermining the chances of peace in the region, he said nothing more than the kinds of things he had said at times when he was in office a quarter-century ago.
But the instant backlash from fellow Republicans that prompted Jeb Bush, the son of Mr. Baker's best friend, to distance himself underscored just how much their party has changed on the issue of Israel. Where past Republican leaders had their disagreements with Israel, today's Republicans have made support for the Jewish state an inviolable litmus test for anyone aspiring to national office.
When Bush added Jim Baker to his list of informal policy advisers, it was further proof of the former Florida governor enjoying the backing of the GOP establishment -- effectively borrowing gravitas by surrounding himself with his family's famous aides.
But when Baker took a stand in support of the United States against Netanyahu's insolence, Bush felt like he had no choice but to distance himself from his father's Secretary of State, condemning Baker's comments more than once.
We have, in other words, entered genuinely bizarre new territory. When there's an international disagreement, today's Republican Party is not only comfortable taking the opposite of the American side -- publicly, shamelessly, and repeatedly -- it also expects every Republican to reflexively fall in line, or face the right's wrath.
Politics, like nature, abhors a vacuum, so when Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) announced his retirement on Friday morning, it was easy to imagine a competitive, and perhaps even fierce, race to succeed him. After all, these leadership posts become available very infrequently -- maybe once a decade -- so Reid's departure, among other things, created a rare opportunity for ambitious Senate Dems.
Of course, Reid recognized all of this, and understood that a divisive leadership fight, possibly splitting the caucus at a difficult time, wouldn't do Democrats any favors. It's why Reid made sure the race for the leadership post was over before it started.
Politico had a good piece over the weekend of the "unusually close bond and political alliance" between Reid and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and the conversation the two had on Friday night when the Minority Leader not only told Schumer about his retirement, but also about his endorsement.
The matter was extraordinarily sensitive, especially since Reid made clear he preferred Schumer over Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin, who has served as the Nevadan's No. 2 for the past decade.
When the Senate finally concluded voting at 3:30 a.m., Reid called Durbin to share the news with him, but he couldn't reach the Illinois Democrat. They didn't personally connect until later Friday morning. But Durbin already sensed something was afoot. Before he spoke with Reid, Durbin told Schumer something that caught his rival off guard: He would support him for leader and would not seek to challenge him.
And with that, the race was over. Schumer is moving up -- whether he's Majority Leader or Minority Leader will be clear in about 20 months -- and his election will likely be uncontested.
If my email inbox is any indication, Schumer's promotion has been met with skepticism from many progressive activists. Critics have a legitimate gripe: the New York Democrat has been cozy with Wall Street for much of his career. Like many other Senate Dems, Schumer also supported the Iraq war in the Bush era, and hasn't exactly championed the Obama administration's agenda on stopping Iran's nuclear ambitions through diplomatic means.
But it's worth pausing to appreciate the unique responsibilities of a Senate party leader.
If Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R) was looking for a way to raise his national visibility in advance of a possible presidential candidate, his new right-to-discriminate law, if nothing else, has given him the national spotlight.
Indiana Gov. Mike Pence on Sunday defended his decision to sign a religious freedom bill into law, saying that it was "absolutely not" a mistake.
In an interview on ABC's "This Week" the Republican governor repeatedly dodged questions on whether the law would legally allow people of Indiana to refuse service to gay and lesbians, saying that residents of the state are "nice" and don't discriminate and that "this is about protecting the religious liberty of people of faith and families of faith."
The interview between the Republican governor and ABC's George Stephanopoulos featured an extraordinary exchange that matters quite a bit. The host noted, for example, that one of Pence's own allies said the new state law is intended to "protect those who oppose gay marriage," leading Stephanopoulos to ask whether a "florist in Indiana can now refuse to serve a gay couple without fear of punishment?"
The governor replied, "This is not about discrimination," which wasn't an answer. So, Stephanopoulos asked again, "Yes or no, if a florist in Indiana refuses to serve a gay couple at their wedding, is that legal now in Indiana?" Pence dodged again.
To his credit, the host pressed on, and again the governor wouldn't answer. Which led to Stephanopoulos' fourth effort: "So when you say tolerance is a two way street, does that mean that Christians who want to refuse service ... to gays and lesbians, that it's now legal in the state of Indiana? That's the simple yes-or-no question."
Once more, the GOP governor simply wouldn't, or couldn't answer.
It was a cringe-worthy display. I'm not even sure why Pence agreed to do the interview in the first place -- the Indiana Republican had to know the question was coming, but the governor was visibly stuck, refusing to respond to the most obvious element of the entire debate.
This past week, NASA's Opportunity rover on Mars hit a major milestone: a marathon. Launched in July of 2003, Opportunity has been on the surface of the Red Planet since January 2004, well over a decade, shattering its design mission lifetime of just 90 days.
Okay, so maybe 11 years and two months is a bit of a marathon record in a bad way, but you try working long days over 35 million miles from home, in temperature ranges of 170 degrees Fahrenheit, being blasted by solar radiation and occasional dust storms. I bet your marathon pace would be a bit off too.
First up from the God Machine this week are some striking comments from a reality television star, kicking up an unexpected dust storm.
Back in December 2013, Phil Robertson, one of the stars of a show called "Duck Dynasty," touched off a culture-war fight with controversial comments about minority groups. A&E, which airs the reality show, suspended him, causing an uproar on the far-right.
Robertson has remained a notable figure in conservative circles -- his recent CPAC appearance raised eyebrows, and just this week he received continued support from Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) -- but it was the reality star's remarks at a Vero Beach Prayer Breakfast that put Robertson back in the national spotlight.
...Robertson offered gruesome details about how an atheist father would react to watching intruders behead his wife and rape and kill his two daughters while they also cut off his penis .... which would supposedly somehow prove a point about following God's laws.
"I'll make a bet with you," Robertson said. "Two guys break into an atheist's home. He has a little atheist wife and two little atheist daughters. Two guys break into his home and tie him up in a chair and gag him. And then they take his two daughters in front of him and rape both of them and then shoot them and they take his wife and then decapitate her head off in front of him. And then they can look at him and say, 'Isn't it great that I don't have to worry about being judged? Isn't it great that there's nothing wrong with this? There's no right or wrong, now is it dude?'"
Robertson kept going: "Then you take a sharp knife and take his manhood and hold it in front of him and say, 'Wouldn't it be something if this [sic] was something wrong with this? But you're the one who says there is no God, there's no right, there's no wrong, so we're just having fun. We're sick in the head, have a nice day.'"
At the same event, Robertson went on to say that American liberals follow Satan and are worse than Stalin and the Nazis.
Remember, all of this was at a prayer breakfast.
Ed Kilgore added, "[T]his guy is just an actor, right? Maybe so, but he was also a featured speaker at this year's CPAC event, and has been hailed as a great and wise American by more Republican pols than you can count. Hell, Mike Huckabee and Bobby Jindal may ultimately come to blows over their competing claims to be the dude's best friend."
And now Phil Robertson is apparently sharing the details of a twisted theological wisdom -- and offering a peek into a specific religious perspective -- which by any fair measure is pretty disgusting.
Rachel Maddow relays stories of Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid that demonstrate his steadfast, combative nature. Reid announced today that he will retire and not run for reelection next year, leaving a vacancy Democrats will be challenged to fill. watch
Dr. Gerald Surya, senior aviation medical examiner, talks with Rachel Maddow about how pilots are evaluated for fitness -including mental fitness- to fly planes, and what stopgaps exist to catch problems when pilots do not honestly self-report issues. watch
Rachel Maddow reports on some stumbles by Republican 2016 contenders, but none more than Indiana governor Mike Pence, who signed a law legalizing discrimination against gay people, incurring the wrath of state businesses that now face likely boycotts. watch
* The latest out of Germany: "Andreas Lubitz, the Germanwings co-pilot believed to have crashed his jet into the French Alps on purpose, apparently hid an illness from his employer, investigators said on Friday."
* Yemen: "Forces aligned with the Iranian-backed Houthi movement continued their advance into areas of southern Yemen on Friday as Saudi Arabia conducted a second day of airstrikes intended to stop them."
* Seriously, no rush: "Janet L. Yellen, the Federal Reserve chairwoman, said on Friday that the Fed planned to raise interest rates more slowly than during past recoveries because of the unusually fragile condition of the American economy."
* It looks like a done deal: "But by mid-afternoon, [Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid] had endorsed New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, no. 3 in the current hierarchy, as his chosen successor -- and Minority Whip Richard J. Durbin's office made it clear that the Illinois senator would also back his colleague and former Capitol Hill roommate."
* Reid was doing a live interview with Nevada Public Radio this morning when President Obama called in to extend his best wishes. It was a sweet moment.
* This ought to be interesting: "France's foreign minister said Friday his country will propose a U.N. Security Council resolution in the coming weeks that could present a framework for negotiations toward resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
* New ethics controversy: "The House Ethics Committee announced Friday that it has opened an investigation into Rep. Ed Whitfield (R-Ky.) regarding allegations that he improperly used his office to help his wife lobby Congress on behalf of the Humane Society."
Just a month ago, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) was asked how he'd confront terrorist threats as president. The Republican governor quickly turned to his political fights against union members in his home state. "If I can take on 100,000 protesters, I can do the same across the world," Walker said.
The governor took some heat for seemingly comparing union members to ISIS, which missed the point, and wasn't even true. What mattered about the response is that, in Walker's mind, union-busting in Wisconsin was preparation for combating ISIS and global terrorism.
The ridiculousness of the governor's answer raised concerns among powerful Republican players -- if this is his response to an obvious question in the midst of crises abroad, Walker may not have a mature understanding of what international leadership requires.
His answer to a similar question this week won't help matters. The Capital Times in Madison reports today:
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who achieved the rank of Eagle Scout as a teen, has taken that motto seriously. His Eagle Scout status has him so prepared, he indicated this week, he's ready to serve as commander in chief of the U.S. military.
The issue came up at a Chamber of Commerce event in Arizona this week, where Hugh Hewitt asked the governor, "Does the prospect of being commander in chief daunt you? Because the world that you describe when you're talking about safety is going to require a commitment to American men and women abroad, obviously at some point. How do you think about that?"
Walker replied, "That's an appropriate question." And things went downhill from there.
As recently as last fall, Sen. Rand Paul's (R-Ky.) opposition to marriage equality was less than definite. "I believe in old-fashioned traditional marriage," he told CNN in an interview, "but I don't really think the government needs to be too involved in this and I think the Republican Party can have people on both sides of the issue."
Asked if he might shift from his position against equal-marriage rights, Paul, quite literally, shrugged his shoulders, as if to say, "Who knows?"
That was October 2014, and the Kentucky Republican has moved sharply to the right ever since. He told Fox News earlier this month that marriages between same-sex couples "offend" him "and a lot of other people." This week, as Right Wing Watch reports, the GOP senator went even further.
In a video posted yesterday by the Christian Broadcasting Network, Rand Paul addressed "a group of pastors and religious leaders at a private prayer breakfast" in Washington D.C. on Thursday about the need for "revival" in America complete with "tent revivals" full of people demanding reform.
He suggested during the event that the debate about legalizing same-sex marriage is the result of a "moral crisis" in the country.
That's not an exaggeration. Paul talked to CBN and the video shows him telling social conservatives, "[T]here's a moral crisis that allows people to think that there would be some sort of other marriage."
It's a striking argument -- not only is Rand Paul opposed to marriage equality, he believes the debate itself shouldn't exist and is the result of a "moral crisis" in the United States.
He added, "We need a revival in the country. We need another Great Awakening with tent revivals of thousands of people saying, 'Reform or see what's going to happen if we don't reform.'"
I can't help but wonder if the senator realizes the degree to which he's abandoned what made him "interesting" to the political world.
Launched in 2008, “The Rachel Maddow Show” follows the machinations of policy making in America, from local political activism to international diplomacy. Rachel Maddow looks past the distractions of political theater and stunts and focuses on the legislative proposals and policies that shape American life - as well as the people making and influencing those policies and their ultimate outcome, intended or otherwise.
Rachel Maddow LIVE
Speak out! Make your voice heard by tagging your posts #maddow