{{show_title_date || "Federal hearing over Obama’s immigration actions begins, 4/17/15, 9:22 AM ET"}}

White House urges appeals court to allow new immigration policy to proceed

Updated

The Obama administration is urging a federal appeals court Friday to lift a court order preventing enforcement of the president’s new rules for allowing millions of undocumented migrants to remain in the country.

The new policy, announced last November, could shield up to five million people from deportation, but it was blocked in February by a federal judge in Houston. 

In response to a lawsuit filed by Texas and 25 other states, the judge said the administration failed to seek public comment before issuing the new immigration rules.  While an appeal of that decision is pending, the government is seeking to have the February injunction lifted.

RELATED: Family faced separation as Obama’s immigration actions hung in the balance

Barring enforcement now, the Justice Department argues, disrupts the Department of Homeland Security’s efforts “to most effectively marshal the agency’s limited resources to protect national security, public safety, and border security.”

The White House says the policy is the result of setting new enforcement priorities, focusing on those who threaten national security or have committed serious crimes.

The judge’s action was so sweeping, the government says, that it even blocks enforcement of the rules in the states that support the new policy. “The nationwide breadth of the injunction is indefensible.”

But the states say the injunction has no effect on federal enforcement priorities. They are challenging provisions in the rules that would allow people  covered by new policy to get work permits and other benefits.

“The injunction neither prohibits nor requires any removal proceedings, and it does not prevent the executive from identifying aliens based on whether they are a removal priority,” the states say in their formal response.

The problem, the states say, is that the rules would confer a lawful legal status on those covered, “which carries significant legal consequences, including eligibility for Social Security, Medicare, the Earned Income Tax Credit, unemployment insurance, and other benefits.”

RELATED: Millions of undocumented immigrants wait in legal limbo

Those new polices, they say, would result in higher costs for them in accommodating people who remain in the US under the proposed rules.          

A three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral argument on the injunction issue Friday in New Orleans.  Two of the judges were appointed by Republican presidents – Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. The third was appointed by President Obama.

A challenge to the the administration’s new rules is likely to wind up in the US Supreme Court. Attorney General Eric Holder in February described the Texas ruling as “an interim step.”

Holder added, “I’ve always expected it will ultimately be decided by a higher court.”

There’s no deadline for the three-judge panel to act, but the case is being heard on an expedited basis. 

Barack Obama, Executive Orders, Immigration Policy and Immigration Reform

White House urges appeals court to allow new immigration policy to proceed

Updated