Judge rules New York’s ‘stop-and-frisk’ violates rights

Updated
By Erin McClam
A woman marches against police stop-and-frisk tactics on February 23, 2013 in New York City.
A woman marches against police stop-and-frisk tactics on February 23, 2013 in New York City.
Andrew Burton/Getty Images

The New York Police Department’s “stop and frisk” tactic, under which millions of mostly black and Hispanic people have been questioned by police over the past decade, has violated constitutional rights, a federal judge ruled Monday.

The judge, Shira Scheindlin of Manhattan federal court, ordered an independent monitor to oversee the program. She pointedly did not order an end to the tactic.

Four men had sued the city, saying that they were unfairly targeted by police. The judge ruled that their Fourth and 14th Amendment rights had been violated. The Fourth protects against unreasonable searches, and the 14th guarantees equal protection under the law.

Scheindlin found that the police had used the tactic 4.4 million times between 2004 and 2012, and that 80 percent of the stops were of blacks and Hispanics.

Read the rest of this story at NBCNews.com.

Judge rules New York's 'stop-and-frisk' violates rights

Updated