Latest StoriesRSS

select from:

E.g., 8/21/2017
E.g., 8/21/2017
Paul Manafort of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump's staff listens during a round table discussion on security at Trump Tower in the Manhattan borough of New York, Aug. 17, 2016. (Photo by Carlo Allegri/Reuters)

Trump says Manafort was on his team 'for a very short period'

08/11/17 04:14PM

Donald Trump was asked yesterday about his opinion on the FBI raiding the home of Paul Manafort, the president's former campaign chairman. Trump replied:

"I thought it was a very, very strong signal, or whatever. I know Mr. Manafort -- I haven't spoken to him in a long time, but I know him. He was with the campaign, as you know, for a very short period of time, relatively short period of time."

This is clearly the line Trump World has embraced with both arms. Then-White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer described Manafort in March as someone "who played a very limited role for a very limited amount of time." Soon after, Spicer told reporters that Manafort was only part of the campaign operation "for five months."

The point is hardly subtle: as the seriousness of the Trump-Russia scandal intensifies, and Manafort's potential legal jeopardy comes into focus, it stands to reason the president and his team are going to respond to questions with answers like, "Paul who?"

But there's no reason to take the defense, such as it is, seriously. Manafort effectively ran the campaign when Trump secured and accepted the Republican Party's presidential nomination. By their own admission, members of Team Trump touted Manafort for being "in charge" of Trump's political operation, "leading" the campaign team.

Without the benefit of a time machine, it's a little late to put distance between the president and his former campaign chairman.

read more

Image: Donald Trump, Andrzej Duda

Trump offers a timely reminder: he's not going to get better

08/11/17 01:07PM

For reasons that still aren't entirely clear, Donald Trump interrupted his vacation this week to announce that he'd respond to North Korean threats with "fire and fury like the world has never seen." Soon after, White House aides quietly tried to walk back the president's saber-rattling, throwing water on the simmering fire.

Which apparently led Trump to reach for the lighter fluid. Speaking yesterday from one his golf resorts, the president said -- three times -- that his "fire and fury" comments perhaps "wasn't tough enough." Asked what would be tougher than "fire and fury," he responded, "Well, you'll see. You'll see."

Determined to escalate matters a little more, Trump turned to Twitter this morning.

"Military solutions are now fully in place, locked and loaded, should North Korea act unwisely," Trump tweeted Friday morning. "Hopefully Kim Jong Un will find another path!"

Moments later, he retweeted a message from the U.S. Pacific Command's official Twitter account, stating that "#USAF B-1B Lancer #bombers on Guam stand ready to fulfill USFK's #FightTonight mission if called upon to do so."

Obviously, there's nothing helpful about provocative posturing like this, but it's not altogether clear what the president is saying. Trump wants everyone to believe "military solutions" are "fully in place, locked and loaded," but what exactly does that mean? Which "solution" to which problem? Because if the president is suggesting the United States military is "fully in place" in preparation for a conflict with a nuclear-armed enemy, that's not entirely true.

We certainly have extensive military resources in the region, but it'd take time and resources to get "fully in place" for a war, and that hasn't happened -- at least not yet -- and this is an inopportune moment for another round of hapless Trump bluffing.

But putting this in the larger context, the president's dangerous morning messages served as a reminder that Trump really isn't getting any better at doing this job.

read more

Friday's Campaign Round-Up, 8.11.17

08/11/17 12:00PM

Today's installment of campaign-related news items from across the country.

* Democratic leaders hoped to convince Rep. Kyrsten Sinema (D) to take on Sen. Jeff Flake (R) in Arizona next year, and the NBC affiliate in Phoenix reports today that she is now planning to do exactly that.

* On a related note, the same report said Phoenix Mayor Greg Stanton (D), who's been rumored as a possible Senate candidate, has signaled an interest in running for Sinema's U.S. House seat.

* In the latest national CNN poll, Democrats now lead Republicans on the generic congressional ballot, 51% to 40%. The midterms are over a year away, but that's a pretty significant advantage.

* Former San Antonio Mayor Julian Castro, who also served as Obama's secretary of Housing and Urban Development, has reportedly formed a new PAC "as he steps up his political activity and considers a possible run for president in 2020."

* Former Vice President Joe Biden continues to show an interest in electoral matters, throwing his support behind former U.S. attorney Doug Jones in his Senate primary in Alabama.

* RNC Chair Ronna Romney McDaniel had an interesting quote this week about her party's messaging: "It is hard to go and make the case, 'give us the majority again,' when we haven't accomplished the things that we ran on."

read more

United Nations Headquarters' General Assembly Building and Secretariat Building in New York City, USA, Sept. 24, 2015. (Photo by Matt Campbell/EPA)

Why Trump sees routine accomplishments as unique triumphs

08/11/17 11:26AM

In response to the latest North Korean missile tests, the U.N. Security Council unanimously approved new sanctions against the dictatorship last weekend. Yesterday, Donald Trump said all the credit for the developments at the United Nations should go to him personally.

"I will say getting the 15–0 vote at the United Nations from the Security Council the other day, that's something that very few presidents would have been able to get."

Look, I was glad to see Saturday's vote at the U.N. It would have been possible for Trump's team to have messed this up in some way, but fortunately that didn't happen. Everything went smoothly, just as it should have.

This was not, however, an especially heavy lift. North Korea has been isolated for many years, and its latest antics have no defenders on the international stage. The appeal for sanctions passed unanimously, not because Trump is a master of diplomacy, persuading foreign nations to go along with a plan they were skeptical of, but because members of the U.N. Security Council were already inclined to support such a resolution.

Also note Trump's self-aggrandizing boast that "very few presidents" would have been able to shepherd such a resolution through the Security Council. That's not even close to being true.

read more

Image: Trump speaks to reporters after a security briefing at his golf estate in Bedminster, New Jersey

Does the US military actually want Donald Trump's 'great favor'?

08/11/17 10:55AM

It's been a couple of weeks since Donald Trump, without warning, announced via Twitter that transgender Americans would no longer be welcome in the United States military. As is often the case with this president, the policy decision stood at the intersection of discrimination and incompetence: Trump hadn't told any of the relevant agencies he was poised to do this, and the White House struggled to defend the change.

Worse, no one in the military knew how to implement Trump's odd tweets, leaving the Pentagon and the service chiefs unsure how to proceed. In fact, since the president's announcement, the military has largely ignored Trump's announcement, pending some kind of policy review.

It's against this backdrop that a reporter asked Trump yesterday why he banned transgender Americans from serving, and why he betrayed a community he pledged to support.

"Look, I have great respect for the community. I think I have great support, or have had great support from that community. I got a lot of votes. But the transgender -- the military is working on it now. They're doing the work. It's been a very difficult situation. And I think I'm doing a lot of people a favor by coming out and just saying it.

"As you know, it's been a very complicated issue for the military. It's been a very confusing issue for the military. And I think I'm doing the military a great favor."

I'm aware of the fact that saying, "Trump's comments don't make sense" is a phrase that gets a lot of use, but the truth is, the president's defense yesterday was bizarre.

read more

Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore speaks to the congregation of Kimberly Church of God, June 28, 2015, in Kimberley, Ala. (Photo by Butch Dill/AP)

Alabama's Moore suggests US may be 'the focus of evil' in the world

08/11/17 10:12AM

Republican voters in Alabama will head to the polls on Tuesday to vote in a U.S. Senate primary, and it's proving to be a tough race to predict. Sen. Luther Strange (R) has the baggage that comes with having been appointed by a disgraced former governor who had to resign, but Strange has the benefit of support from Donald Trump, the NRA, and the Republican establishment.

Rep. Mo Brooks, meanwhile, is in contention, running on an anti-establishment, pro-border-wall platform, but recent polling suggests it's former state Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, twice removed from the bench for ethics violations, who may be the candidate to watch next week.

It's against this backdrop that Moore sat down with The Guardian, where the Alabama Republican suggested he isn't impressed with America's moral standing.

In an interview with the Guardian's Anywhere But Washington series, Moore also said that Ronald Reagan's famous declaration about the Soviet Union being "the focus of evil in the modern world" might today be applied to the US.

"You could say that very well about America, couldn't you?" he said. "We promote a lot of bad things."

Asked for an example of the United States promoting "bad things," Moore said, "Same-sex marriage."

The Guardian reminded Moore that Russian President Vladimir Putin has said effectively the same thing. "Well, maybe Putin is right," Moore replied. "Maybe he's more akin to me than I know."

It's a fascinating perspective. For years, Republicans claimed ownership of American patriotism as if it were their birthright. The idea that a popular GOP candidate in a ruby-red state would suggest that the United States may be "the focus of evil in the modern world" would've been unthinkable in the not-too-distant past.

If a Republican were to say such a thing, he or she could expect to face immediate public rebukes. In theory, it would end his or her career instantly.

read more

Rep. Mike Pompeo listens during the House Select Committee on the Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi hearing, Sep. 17, 2014. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Getty)

Trump believes his CIA director, but only to a point

08/11/17 09:20AM

Even before he became president, Donald Trump went out of his way to dismiss U.S. intelligence assessments he found politically inconvenient. That's continued throughout 2017: the more intelligence professionals tell him Russia attacked the American election to help put him in office, the more Trump tells the public he's more inclined to believe Vladimir Putin.

All of which led to a good question for the president yesterday: if Trump has so many doubts about the findings of the U.S. intelligence agencies, how reliable is the intelligence now as it relates to North Korea? The president responded:

"Well, you know, it's different intelligence. I have Mike Pompeo. I have great confidence in him. That doesn't mean I had confidence in his predecessor. OK? Which I didn't, actually, although -- although he did say good things about me. He did say he had no information or know anything on collusion. So I shouldn't maybe say that, but I will say it.

"But I have tremendous confidence in Mike Pompeo, Dan Coats -- fantastic. I mean, we have -- we have people."

If we cut through the strange nonsense, what Trump was apparently trying to say was that things are different now. He didn't believe intelligence assessments before, but now that Mike Pompeo is the director of the CIA, Trump can finally have confidence in the information presented to him.

In other words, if Mike Pompeo gives the president information about the North Korean threat, Trump is going to believe it.

And that's fine, although it raises a related question: if Pompeo gives the president information about Russia, Trump is going to believe that, too?

read more

Campaign signs are seen before a rally for Republican Presidential hopeful Donald Trump in Charleston, W. Va., on May 5, 2016. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski/AFP/Getty)

West Virginia's governor pitches Trump on a coal bailout

08/11/17 08:40AM

West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice was a Republican, then became a Democrat, only to reverse course again last week to become a Republican again -- though the timing of his decision seemed odd. At face value, he didn't appear to have a reason to switch to the GOP so soon after winning statewide office as a Dem.

This week, however, the motivation seems a little clearer. The Washington Post reported:

Jim Justice, the born-again Republican governor of West Virginia, is floating a federal proposal to bail out the struggling Appalachian coal industry at a cost to taxpayers of up to $4.5 billion a year.

As Justice described it to the Wall Street Journal, under the proposal, the federal government would pay out $15 to eastern power companies for each ton of Appalachian coal they purchase.

The coal industry has been struggling for quite a while, but it's been especially difficult for companies and their employees in Appalachia: companies in recent years have found it easier and cheaper to produce coal in Western states, which has left coal mining in Appalachia with a shrinking percentage of the market.

Faced with these circumstances, which aren't likely to improve, West Virginia's governor -- who stood alongside Donald Trump last week, at an event in which Justice became a Republican again, who also happens to have made his fortunes as a coal magnate -- believes the White House should give coal companies in Eastern states several billion dollars.

This is not a good idea.

read more

Image: TOPSHOT-GERMANY-G20-SUMMIT

As Russia expels U.S. diplomats, Trump publicly thanks Putin

08/11/17 08:00AM

There's an expression in Trump World that the president and his allies are fond of: if you attack Donald Trump, he will punch back 10 times harder. It's a maxim that helps explain why the president tends to get a little hysterical in response to so many perceived slights.

But for Trump, the principle applies only to him personally: the president can't tolerate rebukes that target him, but affronts to the United States, in Trump's mind, are surprisingly acceptable.

Two weeks ago, in response to new economic sanctions approved by Congress, Vladimir Putin's Russian government announced it was expelling 755 people from the American embassy and consulate staff. It was a striking diplomatic move, and an escalation of tensions between the two countries, which seemed to warrant a stern White House response.

Trump, however, remained silent -- until yesterday.

QUESTION: Mr. President, do you have any response to the Russian president expelling 755 workers from our embassy in Russia?

TRUMP: No, I want to thank [Putin], because we're trying to cut down on payroll. And as far as I'm concerned, I'm very thankful that he let go of a large number of people because now we have a smaller payroll. There's no real reason for them to go back. So, I greatly appreciate the fact that they've been able to cut our payroll for the United States. We'll save a lot of money.

To the extent that reality has any meaning, Trump is badly confused about the relevant details. Putin did not "let go" of hundreds of American diplomatic workers -- these U.S. officials have been stationed in Russia, but they were not employees of the Russian government.

The substance of the president's comments are, by fair measure, total nonsense.

But that's really not what's important here. Rather, this is a dynamic in which the Putin government used harsh diplomatic measures to slap the United States in the face, and after two weeks of thought, the American president expressed his gratitude to the Russian government.

Even the most mindless Republican partisans should find this impossible to defend.

read more

Pages